| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Last week my 22 floor office building had a fire alarm. We have fire drills every year so no one was concerned and everyone started down the stairs in an orderly way. Then we smelled smoke and heard sirens. The stairs were very packed and slow moving and many of the women started to panic...Fuck, you kidding? Earthquake? Ha, it takes a lot less than that to make females to run around like their heads were cut off. I remember one time at the office some female was brewing a coffee and I pulled the pot off a split second before it was done brewing and I immediately heard a cackle squeal that made the hair on the back of my neck stand up. Everyone looked thinking someone had committed murder. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/10 05:44 PM |
| 0 | Who else is disgusted by thisWell forget alimony. The real kick in this dialogue is the child support. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:24 AM |
| 1 | Who else is disgusted by thisDoesn't matter what legal contract you have, everything is trumped by child support. The law protects the child's financial obligation before it honors anything else. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:24 AM |
| 0 | Who else is disgusted by thisAbsolutely. At least in California. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:23 AM |
| -1 | Who else is disgusted by thisAnd a few other demographics that I can think of but will not mention. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:22 AM |
| 5 | Who else is disgusted by thisTo be frank, the law applies both ways. If you're a male and the female makes a significant amount of $$ more than you (which isn't all that uncommon these days), you are just as capable of reversing the table. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:19 AM |
| 4 | Who else is disgusted by thisA prenup has absolutely no bearing when it comes to child support. The law protects the child before any other contractual agreement. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:18 AM |
| 2 | Who else is disgusted by thisAnullments usually have very specific requirements to be applicable. Such as proof of being intoxicated , impaired judgement, forced without consent, or some sort of legal error during process. It's not as easy as you'd think. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:16 AM |
| 0 | Who else is disgusted by thisThink hard before you marry ANY cunt. You'll be surprised how little you know of someone and how much a person can change when it comes down to stuff like this. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:15 AM |
| 0 | Who else is disgusted by thisWelcome to the real world. Let's hope you never have to go through it. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:14 AM |
| -3 | Who else is disgusted by thisIt doesn't really matter because everything in the dialogue is factual by case law, and I guarantee you almost every woman going into a divorce would be provided these options by her legal counsel. Most of the time, in a divorce, women feel they've been victimized and seek hateful revenge. All these options will jog through her mind probably in the exact sequence specified. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:13 AM |
| 0 | Who else is disgusted by thisThe scariest thing about the entire dialogue is all of those facts are accurate. - someone who's been there. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:11 AM |
| 2 | Who else is disgusted by thisIn 1956 women were ignorant to their "rights" in a divorce. Today's sue-happy litigious society is the only one that fits the paradigm philosophy reflected in that discussion. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 12:09 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter