TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vegasthief Archive

View 4 posts and 54 comments by vegasthief on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

That's irrelevant because he's famous and rich. As a guy, you simply don't know who is physically attractive guy to woman because you don't have estrogen which is the primary reproductive and sexual hormone in women. Therefore as a guy, you can't tell which guy is really attractive versus which guy is not. There is something I call the "Pretty man" paradox which is that guys tend to rate femininity in others men as attractive particularly because A) Men find feminine traits over masculine traits…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/16 06:45 PM
0

First of, men cannot tell if another man is good looking. Men consider feminine attractive and therefore will find femininity in other men attractive -it's a flawed process. Second, good looks in men is based on body size and facial masculinity. Height is simply a feature of body size and men with bigger body size (height + width + depth + thickness) have bigger testicles as well as bigger sweat glands which elicits more pheremones. Look at the type of men hot women marry, big dudes with a mascu…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/16 05:07 AM
3

It's not if you're brown, white or black. It's if you are attractive. It's if you are tall, big in body size, masculine and charming. And obviously white and black men tend to outdominate asian and indian men in those areas. Skin color is hardly relevant if you're unattractive. Men really need to get a reality check and question if they are even attractive to begin with.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/16 03:59 AM
-1

Men's rights subreddit is full of red pillers dude. Fuck men's rights. It's just a chauvenist cult.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:29 AM
-2

What's wrong with race? There are racial differences that women wouldn't want to deal with.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:29 AM
-1

Nonsense. The only women that are suffering are narcissistic women just like the ones that are suffering are narcissistic men. And they are all mostly conservatives since Republicans have the highest divorce rate out any any group.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:28 AM
-6

Found the basement dwelling "nice guy". Yeah men are much worse bud. Yeah women are stupid, but men haven no soul. They are like autistic machines designed to fuck and watch sports.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 01:14 AM
-1

Actually I'm the best thing in her life because I give her advice and skills to know what men really are. Something most women don't understand: Most men are assholes until proven otherwise. And when you do find the nice guy in your life whose preferbly tall, marry him.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 01:05 AM
0

Ugh no. Evolutionary wise human females got pregnant early and therefore were physically constrained to move around and explore dangerous environments for food. Therefore they relied on men. And if you had noticed, those circumstances are no longer real in modern society. Women get pregnant at 27 on average and they are not constrained by anything except their primitive urges (most westerners are).
/r/MensRights23/07/16 12:54 AM
0

I'm 55 years old, divorced and have a daughter on weekends. Don't project.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 12:31 AM
-4

Good luck having a healthy offspring then especially a intelligent son lol. Given that 70 percent of a male's intelligence comes from is mother. It just goes to show how mentally retarded men are. So glad more men are suffering in society now more than ever. Karma bitch.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 12:21 AM
-10

Nope. You're just not attracted to women more intelligent than you because you're an insecure little dipshit who thinks she will cuck you with her IQ points XD. It's all about the ego bro. Women don't like smothering with flowers? You're an idiot loool.....how silly and stupid.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 11:46 PM
-5

OH yeah wrong study. I changed it.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 11:26 PM
1

Sexual conflict is inevitable. Women are essentially the losers of sexual conflict in the human species whereas in other species such as Hyenas, Lemurs and Bonobos females are the winners. It all depends on the environmental pressure and selection on evolution.
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 07:44 PM
0

Your explanation is poor attempt in trying to create your own bias narrative. Patriarchy is a fact. Patriarchy is more than just male domination but it's a form of hierarchy where men are ranked from best to worst in status, and women as a group are ranked below and made to be dependent on men. Patriarchy is essentially a byproduct of natural male hierarchy which is universal and even exists in modern day western society. Men have more to benefit from controlling female reproductive functions wh…
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 07:42 PM
0

Are you idiotic? In tribal societies there are just as much monogomy as civil cities. Lol, go read about the Hazda in Africa. There is no difference, women have more lose from promiscuity and therefore rarely initiated in the past. In modern days we have condoms and contraception so norms have changed.
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 07:34 PM
0

Monogomy has existed for more than 500,000 years. As for the rest of your comments I don't know what your blabbing about. We are a biological species and are wired to pursue the other sex regardless of what a minority of mgtow rage about online because of their bitterness and neuroticism.
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 07:31 PM
0

Who gives a shit about Warren Farell? I just look at the issues that MRAs highlight and do not invest my time reading propaganda pieces from said propaganda artists like Farell. MRAs don't have a reason to exist because their issues are futile and are not even gender exclusive.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 06:23 PM
0

Honestly I didn't read a single thing you wrote. It had nothing to do with my post on the historical reasons why men were motivated to marry and why they are still motivated to marry in third world countries. The simple answer is SEX. That's it. Men are highly driven by sex and historically with no venues to release that sexual urge, men married as young as possible to have sex and which would result in many offsprings for the woman to take care of. The option of men not marrying is only a moder…
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 06:11 PM
0

Omg. You don't realize that I have already read everything about MRA issues right? The arguments based on homeless, suicide, circumcision, yady yada all that I have gone over and read. I'm very aware of how both the feminist and the Men's rights movement started and why it exists. Third Wave feminism began in an era of hedonism when college rapes were statistically high as was the use of drugs, alcohol and a lack of education of what consent meant. Sexism was very open and political correctness …
/r/MensRights21/07/16 07:34 AM
0

My opinions are of my own buddy. I actually read history and philosophy as well as evolutionary psychology among other things. Of course women would have done better lol, do you see the egalitarian and peaceful state of scandnavian countries which have the highest rate of female politicians in the world? And then can you compare it to the US congress which is male dominated and the most violent nation in the world? Is it a coincidence that socially liberal feminist countries are the most peacefu…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 07:20 AM
0

And also, men by far dominate every corner of civilization and control every aspect of culture. Women by far don't. Saying men have problems akin to the freaking dominating status that they have over every sector, institution, company and industry in society is just retarded because it simply doesn't compare. Even our language is a male construct as we called humans "Mankind"and the origin of the word woman is "Man's wife" in ancient german, and even media created by men expresses male dominance…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 07:10 AM
0

It's pretty black and white. That's like saying oh there were some white people who've had it bad therefore both whites and blacks can have advantages/ disadvantages. It's just a bullshit argument. I'm not denying that men may have time to time suffered some issues like conscription or w.e. (hardly ever since most soldiers historically volunteered) or even other issues I may not be aware of. But oppression of women was on a systematic scale and affected every single woman under the patriarch lea…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 07:00 AM
0

Honestly I don't really care. Those idiots sound like conservatives from outside the city barging in to feed propaganda to a bunch of socially isolated white suburban males. Male victimhood propaganda shouldn't spread so I don't really empathize with any of those incidents.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 06:45 AM
0

That's stupid. Just because both men and women can have advantages and disadvantages does not in any way imply their proportion are equal. Women have had inferior legal rights to men by a mountain slide and Warren Farell the moron tries to sugarcoat this piece of history by eliciting male victimhood. Most men never fought any war or were in any position of legal inferiority in comparison to women. Women experienced many painful childbirths while at the same time have had zero to less personal au…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 06:35 AM
0

Yeah men oppressed women and viewed them like shit, it's written in every religion, philosophical teachings of Aristotle, and even in literature by men. And men can't be entirely to blame because women too themselves were complient and submissive to what men told them as a result of evolutionary flaws mixed with male competitiveness + male dominated hierarchy. I literally think it's the worst thing to be a woman and would never want to reincarnate as one because you are literally born as baby ma…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:25 AM
0

No they are not. There are way too many quotes by people Warren Farell and Erin Prizzey that's just disturbing and no context would justify it. The myth of male power? Dude the title in itself verifies what I just told you. And LOL shocking when it's taken out of context? It's shocking both in and without context. He's making provocative statements to further his chauvenist agenda. "From a male perspective" From a male perspective, men always had it fucking good. Yeah they worked in physical lab…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:15 AM
0

You're talking about one incident at University of Toronto. Listen, there are many MRA groups here (although no one likes them) and Ryerson University I believe has the biggest mra organization out of all the universities in Ontario. They are not harassed but occasionaly do get exposed for sharing beliefs with extreme groups like AVM in which case feminists do get triggered. But other than that, there has never been any problem. Yeah Toronto is a multicultural city man. Obviously there's going t…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:01 AM
-1

And this is good because crime has significantly decreased because women were no longer constrained into marrying with ugly antisocial males. You had like a whole portion of lower class antisocial men since the 1970s who didn't create any offsprings and therefore it reduced the crime levels now. Crimes have significantly decreased because of women's greater choice in who they want to marry.
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 02:39 AM
0

Yeah buddy. Women marry for money when they have less money, and when they have equal money they start going for looks. Ugly men out of the ball game brah.
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 02:37 AM
0

Soft spoken MRA? Warren Farell published a book that depicted men as victims and women never having been oppressed during history. It's an actual insult to both historians and all the women who have suffered for no reason except for men's own actions.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 02:33 AM
-1

Oh please, so you're argument now is that men were gold diggers? HAHA. This is just utter pathetic. Men married simply because they were eager to have sex during a time when pre-marital sex was taboo and contraception was non-existent. Do you know how horny men in those days were when pornography didn't exist and hookers were ugly/sinful? It's simple sociobiology so stop being an ignorant cunt.
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 12:37 AM
0

XD You know what's hilarious? Men's rights activists reject the dictionary definition of feminism but accept the dictionary definition of equality. Equality has ALWAYS been in most movements about Social Equality. It's the equality to be treated with fairness and equal balance without having one social group unjustly dominating over another. What you are talking about is not equality. You want male issues which have little impact on the male population to be funded as much as female issues which…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:06 PM
1

Absolute equality or communism equality has nothing to do with fairness. Fairness has to do with balancing the prioritization of issues based on their importance. No I'm insulting you because you are stubborn and irrational.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:54 PM
0

It's relative equality jackass. It's equality in the general sense of being equally obligated to help all demographics when the issues are of equal importance. Otherwise, it's not reasonable. God, I can tell you're one of those bitter angry guys.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 06:11 PM
0

"Equal amount of money spent on male health related issues" Holy shit, why does it have to be equal amounts of money idiot? Should we spent equal amount of money on white issues as much as immigrant issues? We spend money based on how important the issues is relative the group we are spending it for.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:20 PM
0

Homeless shelters for men, free mental health services for everybody etc etc. Like it's stupid to argue for men's rights activism here.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:24 AM
-1

Men hated marriage in the past? That's nonsense. I'm originally from Bangladesh where traditional norms are similar to that of the West during the late 19th century, men are more eager for marriage than anybody else. It's mostly to do with status and sex drive. Women are also interested in marriage. Most women comply with patriarchy as they see it as the natural order of things, until of course they get an education, a career and a sense of independence when they actually start questioning this …
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 06:35 AM
-1

No idiot. I wasn't talking about marriage when I said patriarchal privilege, I was talking about men being the sole breadwinner while women being restricted to domestic duties. Such power imbalance allowed men to easily get married as women naturally were attracted to the first potential breadwinner they can attract. Nowdays both men and women are breadwinners or work in some sort of career, and therefore that privilege men once had is gone. And that's mostly because of industrialization and tec…
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 06:25 AM
1

I think the male circumcision as an issue is at the bottom of the list because banning it conflicts with the religious freedom of billions of muslims/jews and also the practise itself has very little impact on male sexual and psychological functioning. The only moral issue here is the body integrity part, so I think it's a issue that will require engaging with religious leaders as well as the religious community.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 04:35 AM
-2

No I'm serious. Most women against feminism seem to be like loner types that's probably catering to men by advertising traditional gender roles etc. They are also more likely to be conservatives. I used to think feminists are ugly too, until I found out there are actually a lot of pretty attractive feminists but they are not as active as the common trigglypuff.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 02:07 AM
1

You can't throw away peer reviewed secondary sources buddy. They are as good as facts. I don't think you know how science works. These research material had to go through a whole editorial board before it got published in such journals.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:45 AM
-7

Ugh these are cherrypicked primary sources. Let me give you a sum up of the actual secondary reviews & meta-analysis on what scientists think of circumcision: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881635/ And no, lol that's a myth. You are talking about someone WHO IS CIRCUMCISED dummy. Yes, there is less sensitivity after circumcision only if you don't moisturize it. The sensitivity comes from the penis glans being exposed to air which causes the skin to roughen up with a new layer that …
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:34 AM
-3

You're an MRA in toronto? I live Toronto and there is no need for the MRAs here. Everything is already gender equal.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:12 AM
-9

Who carees dude. And no, I was 6 years old and know the before-after affects of circumcision. No difference except you might have to regularly moisturize penis head to keep it more sensitive.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 12:59 AM
-10

I'm a male who is circumcised. I seriously don't know why the FK men's rights activists are crying out for my behalf. I haven no problem being circumcised.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 12:22 AM
-5

These girls look very introverted.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 11:53 PM
1

I don't know what that is. Facts require good quality credible publications in a peer reviewed scientific journal. Not everything that comes out out college papers are good quality material lol.
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 06:24 AM
2

False. Patiarchy was not there to serve the interests of women but rather *to control women's reproductive capacity in a male hierarchical system. Patriarchy is a fact in history and men's oppression of women is probably the most saddest notable fact of human history (aside from the World war 1-2) Ancient China Women throughout historical and ancient China were considered inferior and had subordinate legal status based on the Confucian law.] In Imperial China, the "Three Obediences"promoted daug…
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 10:14 PM
1

You are just hilarious. Artificial uterus? Yeah men are going to start lining up to use artifical uterus's and sexbots. Like sex dolls that look real already exist from 300-2000 dollars a piece. How many men are buying those? Like less than 0.00001 %. "Impossible for women to be worth of something" They don't care how much your think worthy of them, many women simply become single mothers by choice or enter partnerships with other women. I talked to many. It's men that are going to be suffering …
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 10:04 PM
1

Yes, I generally know most things you would question about women. I'm also deeply interested about evolutionary psychology and formulated my own theory that men/women evolved separately due to different social roles. The male and female brain is also vastly different in the way they process and understand the world, which is what leads to conflicts between men and women in relationships.
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 04:09 AM
1

Ugh I don't think I have heard about that one. Most research indicates that women with lower waist to hip ratio (sexy women) have orgasm from a man with perceived masculinity especially facial masculinity.
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 04:06 AM
0

I'm a man dipshit. Y the fuck do u think a female would be explore this shitty sub-reddit?
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 04:04 AM
1

It's various reviews and meta-nalysis from different fields such as neuroscience brain research, evolutionary psychology, social psychology, research on the evolution of hormonal functions. I also did research on sexual dimorphism of different mammals especially our close primate cousins such as chimpanzees and bonobos.
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 04:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter