TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

veggiter Archive

View 0 posts and 109 comments by veggiter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

For me it does explain it, but most people don't actually understand intersectionality or take it to its logical conclusion. The whole point is that there are different facets of oppression that interact in novel ways and oppress people in a way that can be more than the sum of its parts. It's not actually about box checking or tallying oppression. It's a complicated mess that isn't always predictable. Tbh, intersectionality came from feminism, but it seems to me like it was doomed to challenge …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 05:08 AM
1

No. Not everything that is unethical should have legal consequences. And just because something isn't illegal doesn't mean it should be done.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/22 04:08 PM
1

Obviously you don't slap people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/22 03:54 PM
1

I didn't say it's wrong by default. It is wrong here though. A slap is embarrassing, but it doesn't justify legal action.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/22 02:34 AM
-4

Involving police in matters like this is not the move.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/22 07:07 AM
18

I wrote a long ass comment for the one they did allow, but they locked it after 3 hrs when discussion had "run its course".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/22 07:37 PM
3

/r/CuckoldPsychology
/r/MensRights31/10/19 04:41 AM
1

Why would you need a safe space for a service that can only be done one-on-one?
/r/MensRights05/07/19 04:36 PM
3

Noun exection Obsolete form of exsection. Noun exsection (plural exsections) A cutting out or away. Poor guy.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 06:36 PM
3

Unless I just nutted or drank way too much, my dick is getting hard if it's in a woman's hand.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 06:34 PM
2

I check out /r/MensLib pretty often. I think the rule about not being critical of feminism is more about not rejecting it as a whole. I've seen plenty of comments and made plenty of my own that criticize feminist views or assumptions, and those comments are left alone by mods. They are often upvoted as well. Personally I have issues with both this sub and ML, but for good or bad, it's actually refreshing over there to not see so many comments harping on feminism and/or women causing men's proble…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 07:56 PM
1

I agree with your first part but not the second. Seems like "alpha males" are usually more comfortable with physicality.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 08:42 AM
1

I don't watch GoT, and I'm not really aware of the meltdown. I did watch an episode with family the other day, and saw Emilia Clark's character fuck some shit up, but I am completely unaware of the context. You might have a point about men embracing the apparent darkness in antiheroes. I think Breaking Bad is a good example of that. I was having trouble thinking of any female antiheroes (within the context of their morality) depicted in film or whatever until I googled it. Kill Bill was one I re…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:29 PM
2

I believe you meant "evolutionary psychology", which is pretty widely criticized because many of its assumptions aren't testable or supported by a ton of evidence.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 10:50 PM
2

What was I born in January?
/r/MensRights15/05/19 10:40 PM
1

In that case, I still like egalitarian more because it highlights that there are issues other than gender that generally have a bigger impact on someone's level of oppression.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 10:36 PM
7

and yet we still won't acknowledge and act to correct institutional racism, institutional and blatant trans and homophobia, and the world is still pretty sexist and hostile place for women. I think the implication is that those problems are getting increasingly addressed and openly discussed. Most rational people are against those things and won't bat an eye when people rail against them. They're obviously bad. On the other hand, society doesn't even acknowledge let alone address things like mal…
/r/MensRights15/05/19 10:29 PM
3

Not to mention, if women have a more difficult time getting CEO positions, it's likely that the ones that do are more skilled. The compared mean averages in this context mean very little if there are so many more male CEOs than female ones.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 10:50 PM
1

I cuckled
/r/MensRights01/09/16 09:19 PM
13

Did you hear that California is a No Fault + DV Reparations State, meaning you split the assets 50/50, unless the judge believes there was domestic violence, in which case the judge can adjust this to 100/0? Amber Heard...
/r/MensRights30/05/16 05:36 PM
10

Yeah, who pays for air? I just abscond with it in my lungs.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:17 AM
12

I mean, dragons are male and female, right? No, because dragons don't gender doesn't exist. It's a social construct.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:14 AM
1

Ah, the old collapsing building switcharoo.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:57 PM
0

I think I might have initially interpreted that as sarcasm, but the point is, the comic, in tone and layout, depict the two sides as equivalent. It's worth talking about, sure, but the conversation is flawed from the beginning if you start with the premise implied by the comic. That's why I don't really see anything wrong with your friend's initial reaction. The persistence and disregard for your clarifications was kind of irritating. They didn't address the actual issue. That being said, if you…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:55 PM
0

That's not how the human species works.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:52 PM
1

They aren't equivalent scenarios, and the comic is misleading in representing them as such (in terms of content and layout). You could make an effort to make things more fair, but acting like complete fairness is an attainable goal is ridiculous. It's biologically impossible. As far as your edit goes, the problem with that is bodily autonomy. Someone has the right to their own body and has veto power over whether or not they want to be pregnant.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 08:26 PM
-1

Your friend is right. They aren't equivalent scenarios. You could take steps to make the situation more fair in terms of social obligations, but the fact remains that childbearing will never be fair to either party. Biologically there is a far greater investment for the woman, but women also have much more control over the outcome, regardless of what rights a particular society upholds. Whether or not you agree with the intent of the comic strip, it's still a false equivalence.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 08:20 PM
1

What is the purpose of this video? Is the subject really deserving of attention?
/r/MensRights19/10/15 01:07 AM
1

Source? Or any clarification by what you mean by "many"?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 05:26 PM
0

Do you honestly think there are rampant falsified claims of child abuse?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:23 AM
1

Yeah, see, I'm not really into placing adultery in the same boat as rape or child molestation. Violent criminals who prey on those weaker than them don't get my sympathy in the way nonviolent criminals do. To be clear, I'm not talking about public urination or even milder cases of statutory rape. I'm talking about people who harm others in irreparable ways. I don't give a fuck about their privacy or shame. I would prefer they had the support for rehabilitation (like they receive in certain count…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:18 AM
-1

So many women would love going through the rest of their life saying how they rescued her child, forever rubbing it in, not only, the fathers face but the childs face for the rest of their lives, and also the neighbor's face and the church community's face. What are you even talking about? Who are these "so many women" who are going to frame their husbands for child abuse? While I think domestic violence cases favor women, I highly doubt there are large numbers of women who would be interested i…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:10 AM
1

They do show the crime in registries, but I don't think public pissers should be on there at all.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:59 AM
1

The problem with registries is it treat all offenders the same. As I understand, all sex offenders must register. The people who urinated in the wrong place at the wrong time, the people who had sex a month too early, and the people who legitimately harmed another person. While I don't think public urination should land someone on a registry (let alone be a crime at all), I've never seen a registry that didn't show what crime the person was convicted of.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:58 AM
2

That's weird. I get maybe a few a year. Hardly a priority for me to avoid them.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:53 AM
-12

Do you have a source that better reflects your alternative interpretation?
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:28 AM
-16

Morris and Mock had met online and quickly become friends; they hung out on several occasions and decided to attend a house party together. Morris had too much to drink—someone might have slipped her something, though no evidence established this—and went to the bathroom to be sick. Mock found her, took her to a bedroom, and they had sex. Sure, there isn't enough evidence to convict this guy (and he shouldn't be convicted as a result), but does he really sound like a good guy? Sounds like he fou…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:01 AM
3

Prison is not about rehabilitation unfortunately. The penitentiary system, though originally intended for that purpose, was found to be a horrible failure in the regard. We still hung on to it anyway for some reason.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 06:48 AM
1

I would hope it would be different (as I wish this situation was). No person deserves to be disrespected this way, prisoner or not.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 06:46 AM
3

This isn't just gender discrimination. IIRC, long hair is an important part of (at least some) Native American culture and having short hair is a sign of shame. It's religious/cultural discrimination as well. Do they force Muslims, Orthodox Jews, Sikhs, etc. to groom themselves in similar ways? Serious question.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 06:42 AM
1

Fake.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:58 PM
1

I'm pretty sure that's how it works. I'm on the list for a comment in /r/subredditcancer where I borderline defend the bans of FPH clones. It was like 23 karma, which I guess was over their threshold.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:00 AM
1

*are *issues
/r/MensRights30/06/15 05:49 AM
2

If he bought that popcorn from the theater, by my estimate it cost him about $35,000.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:49 PM
1

How do they deal with such rampant sexism and oppression?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:39 PM
1

This is completely conjecture. The fact is, the source of traditional gender roles is not really that important (personally I think it's part biological, part functional, and part cultural). What's relevant here is that they persist for one reason or another. As trad gender roles held sway for most of history, however, we can't expect them to disappear overnight. It's seems now that you've admitted that my point is accurate. I don't really see what you are trying to argue at this point.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 07:58 PM
1

So what you're saying is that gender inequality is caused by the fact that men are disposable. Do you instead mean to imply that men are seen as disposable? That would be the result of gender roles.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:21 PM
1

These definitions from Wikipedia are close enough for me: Oppression is the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner.[ Social oppression is the socially supported mistreatment and exploitation of a group, category, or team of people or individual.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 11:55 AM
2

From wiki: There is evidence that Marianne wrote musical compositions, as there are letters from Wolfgang praising her work, but the voluminous correspondence of her father never mentions any of her compositions, and none have survived.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:52 AM
-1

I presented an example that shows that women have faced oppression (in the arts) in the past based on gender roles. I also illustrated with another example that historical gender roles persist in some form today. I made no claim of proving anything, but I don't really see how you can dismiss the persistence of traditional gender roles in society today. What, in your opinion, is the cause of the oppression documented daily in this sub? Or do you think gender oppression began with the birth of sec…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 02:06 AM
-1

If it was unconscious, and it wasn't a conspiracy, then how did men cohere as a group to overpower women? Traditions, cultural expectations, gender roles, etc. I thought I was pretty clear about that. Now it sounds like you are arguing that men are natural sociopaths who have so little empathy for their own kin (wives, daughters, sisters, mothers) that they would dominate them for pure material advantage. I have no clue where you're getting any of this from. Care to point out where I made a clai…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:57 AM
0

It's actually precisely my study of gender relations outside of modern first world countries that convinced me that "patriarchy" was an oversimplified narrative. I agree whole-heartedly that it's an oversimplification, but I think the way it's often understood (inaccurately) is a far greater oversimplification. As you can see in my wiki quote above, it addresses the impact of gender roles on both genders. I do not agree with the obvious implications of the term (which I think lead to its misinte…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:40 AM
-3

That isn't what you were arguing: its a conspiracy to keep talented women down perpetrated by men at the expense of women. That's a ridiculous view and a straw man. I've never heard anyone describe gender inequality in this way. Now, not only do I think many people hold the view that women as a group have been subjugated by men as a group throughout history, I also happen to think its an accurate view. That is, outside of modern, first-world countries, I think women are the more oppressed group,…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:46 PM
2

Relevant
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:58 PM
1

Established gender roles aren't some conspiracy perpetrated by men or women. I don't know of anyone who holds that position. They are perpetrated by all of society and they have implications for how all of us behave. Those gender roles are 99% of the reason why we need gender/sexuality rights movements (feminism, men's rights, and lgbt rights). You can criticize the patriarchy if you'd like, but that isn't what that is either. Anyway, here's a pretty obvious example. Mozart's sister was also a m…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:53 PM
1

woosh
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:40 PM
4

Is it still battery if you aren't charged?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:39 AM
11

This was every single teacher I had at my Catholic grade school.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 08:14 PM
4

*ruff
/r/MensRights14/03/15 09:11 AM
2

It's Algernon. Some mouse that liked flowers.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 09:01 AM
5

Home school doesn't count.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 08:59 AM
1

/r/fiveheads
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/15 09:41 AM
1

I don't have homework, but do you have sources for the claims about DV, false rape accusations, and paternity fraud? Not challenging you, just looking for some reading about them. If it's a pain in the ass, don't worry about it.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:49 PM
2

To be fair, only one of those situations was ongoing.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:39 PM
1

Has he sat on a subway with his legs more than 2.3 inches apart?
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:35 PM
-1

This is a ridiculous statement. I'd bet anyone who has ever drank had a little too much at one point or another. Doesn't mean they can't be raped or should lose the right to justice. Not to mention how you intend to define "responsibly". It's comments like this getting upvoted that make people criticize this sub.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 07:57 PM
1

People that spell it wodka.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 07:52 PM
0

It's typical of this sub. Very true
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:01 PM
-1

Why the downvotes? Is this incorrect?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:20 AM
10

No. Pick...now.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:18 AM
-1

I don't see anything wrong with getting divorced. Someone's lifestyle and decisions aren't my business. Also, though I hate how often it's thrown around: correlation does not equal causation. In fact it sounds to me like you are saying that women who have many different partners...like having different partners. Also...source for any of that?
/r/MensRights18/01/15 12:47 AM
4

Any source for this, or are you just pulling it out of your ass?
/r/MensRights18/01/15 12:45 AM
1

Most of the time I see the word "slut shaming" it's talking about people criticizing women for what they wear or for sleeping with too many people regardless of context. I don't really think many people would defend infidelity.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 12:34 AM
32

From my experience people aren't that specific in their use of "slut", but I do agree with your opinion otherwise. Bodily autonomy doesn't excuse being an asshole.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 07:04 PM
22

That's a matter of opinion. That's actually the basis of my position. It's up to an individual to decide what they do with their body. You can disagree, but you are claiming that your opinion of what someone should do with their life is better than theirs. I don't think you have enough information to make that judgement about anyone, especially about people overall.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:57 PM
100

There's nothing wrong with being a "slut". There is something wrong with deceiving people and especially something wrong with denying them the right to find out the truth.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:00 PM
4

Bippity boppity boopity
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:06 PM
3

No. The news outlet that started the controversy made the typo.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:41 AM
0

As I've said elsewhere in this thread, it's most definitely weird. It's not, however, molestation.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:31 AM
-6

I'm not exactly sure what your point is. That she's a child molester? Where is the evidence of molestation? A child kissing another isn't molestation. A 7-year-old innocently touching another child's genitals isn't molestation. A teen masturbating (or watching TV or reading) while her sister sleeps next to her in bed isn't molestation. You can hate her all you want and criticize her book and the impact it's has on an innocent man's life, but you're nuts if you think anything in her book constitu…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:25 PM
-6

As far as I know, she wasn't doing all of these things as a teenager. Her sister was asking to sleep in her bed until she was 17, and she let her. That's it. There is no indication that she was masturbating to her sister or that her sister was laying on top of her. You just made that up. She was masturbating because she was a teenager, and her sister was in her bed because she asked to be. We both know that this would be ringing major alarm bells in most of the public if the genders were reverse…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 09:16 PM
-5

Her sticky, muscly little body thrashed beside me every night as I read Anne Sexton, watched reruns of SNL, sometimes even as I slipped my hand into my underwear to figure some stuff out” If the bold part wasn't there, I would agree with you, but the fact that the tame reference to masturbation doesn't come until after the more mundane parts tell me that she wasn't sexualizing her sister. I'm not saying she isn't a shitty writer. She makes awful word choices that got her into this mess, but take…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:13 PM
-14

Jesus fucking christ. No. She found rocks in her sister's vagina. Her 1-year-old sister put them there. Has anyone here actually read any of the articles that talk about this? She'd bribe her sister for platonic kisses and attention and described her methods of bribery as like those of a predator. A poor word choice she has since apologized for. Her sister asked her to sleep in bed with her every night. She let her, and masturbated occasionally because she was a teenager. Inappropriate, but not …
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:09 PM
-14

Not to me.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:04 PM
-9

How it's being reported: A relationship that she wrote included Dunham’s offering the then-toddler sister "three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds ... basically anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl" and how she would "carefully spread open her" sister's legs out of curiosity. The excerpt you are talking about: As she grew, I took to bribing her time and affection: one dollar in quarters if I could do her makeup like a “motorcycle chick.”…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:03 PM
-1

Here is the actual excerpt: I shared a bed with my sister, Grace, until I was seventeen years old. She was afraid to sleep alone and would begin asking me around 5:00 P.M. every day whether she could sleep with me. I put on a big show of saying no, taking pleasure in watching her beg and sulk, but eventually I always relented. Her sticky, muscly little body thrashed beside me every night as I read Anne Sexton, watched reruns of SNL, sometimes even as I slipped my hand into my underwear to figure…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:59 PM
2

Really? based on what?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:55 PM
-7

Here's the excerpt: I shared a bed with my sister, Grace, until I was seventeen years old. She was afraid to sleep alone and would begin asking me around 5:00 P.M. every day whether she could sleep with me. I put on a big show of saying no, taking pleasure in watching her beg and sulk, but eventually I always relented. Her sticky, muscly little body thrashed beside me every night as I read Anne Sexton, watched reruns of SNL, sometimes even as I slipped my hand into my underwear to figure some st…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:54 PM
0

Then why did she come out and pseudo-apologize for what she wrote? Because an innocent man is getting attacked and may face legal problems as a result. This doesn't excuse a half-assed apology (that may be for legal reasons, since he may sue her), but it does explain it. Why did she try and cover it up by claiming it was right wing conspiracy against her? Because right wing news outlets are taking an innocent story and using it to paint her as a child molester. Then they are using that to discre…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:16 PM
-4

7 not 17. 17 was a typo. The Truth Revolt article was updated with a correction: “This article has been modified to correct a typo in the book excerpt incorrectly listing Dunham's age as seventeen.” http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/lena-dunham-slams-claims-sexually-abused-sister-article-1.1996669
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:57 PM
-17

The quotes are taken out of context compiled to seem like she was molesting her sister. She looked at her sister's vagina in a nonsexual way at 7. She also describes bribing her sister for kisses and attention in a platonic way. She compares her bribes as similar to the tactics used by predators (promising candy for kisses). It was a poor word choice, not a confession.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:57 PM
-1

Not true: The Truth Revolt article was updated with a correction: “This article has been modified to correct a typo in the book excerpt incorrectly listing Dunham's age as seventeen.” http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/lena-dunham-slams-claims-sexually-abused-sister-article-1.1996669
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:50 PM
-3

Not true: The Truth Revolt article was updated with a correction: “This article has been modified to correct a typo in the book excerpt incorrectly listing Dunham's age as seventeen.” http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/lena-dunham-slams-claims-sexually-abused-sister-article-1.1996669
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:49 PM
-5

The real backstory or the /r/MensRights circlejerk? Here is an article that goes into what she wrote. It sounds to me like there was a guy who was being incredibly sexual aggressive toward her and she didn't make it clear that she didn't want to have sex with him. He also fingered her without consent and did all of this when she was severely intoxicated. Also, it appears that he took off or never put on a condom that she assumed he had on. Though she didn't see it as rape at first, a friend seem…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:48 PM
3

Where in the book did she describe molesting her sister as a teenager? The only excerpt I've seen said she was 7, and it wasn't molestation. The Truth Revolt article was updated with a correction: “This article has been modified to correct a typo in the book excerpt incorrectly listing Dunham's age as seventeen.” http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/lena-dunham-slams-claims-sexually-abused-sister-article-1.1996669
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:35 PM
-2

She didn't say that. It was a typo printed by one news site that was carried to others. She looked at and briefly touched her sister's vagina in a nonsexual way. That isn't, by any stretch of the imagination, molestation, and any opinions I've read from psychologists interpret it that way. She also kissed her sister platonically. Again, not molestation.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:20 PM
-23

She didn't molest her sister. She looked at her sister's vagina when she was 7.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:12 PM
2

If you actually read the opinion of psychologists who interpreted what she did as a 7-year-old, they all agree it wasn't abuse. I've read the excerpt from her book. She was 7, she looked at briefly touched her sister's vagina in a nonsexual manner. On other occasions, she made her sister kiss her and lay on her in a platonic way, because she liked getting attention from her little sister. The comment about being a predator, though a shitty way to put it, was meant to refer to the tactics she use…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:11 PM
2

Busting tables sounds fun. Where do you get a job doing that?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:45 AM
1

Say "it was my privilege." Be careful. This may actually qualify as rape on some college campuses.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:36 AM
1

I don't see any way or any reason to quantify and try to compare men's and women's issues and claim they are equal. How could you possibly determine this? How do you determine the level of opression of a subjective experience? What about the role of other privileges and disadvantages like race, socioeconomic status, orientation, attractiveness, etc.? Also, if you did somehow find a way to reasonably quantify and compare the two, what end would that serve? It would most likely favor one gender ov…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 02:52 PM
12

I'm guessing because extreme and ridiculous feminist sentiments get mainstream exposure and often acceptance from large portions of society. I don't really know anything about Nymag, but it seems more "credible" than a somewhat obscure, heavily criticized (and rightly so) subreddit. I agree that posts like this are kind of nitpicky, and I'm much more interested in men's issues than I am anti-feminism, but it says something that this is publishable, but being opposed to taking a knife to the geni…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 07:05 AM
3

Meh. The best part of this was the quote in the post. Stereotyping people and equating scientists with "geeks" is a pretty shallow way to view this.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 06:53 AM
1

I suppose you are right, after I watched again. She technically does everything a severely intoxicated person would do. The thing is, her body language and speech patterns don't match and aren't consistent. It's obvious, as a viewer, that she is acting. I think if I saw her in public, I would assume she was pretending to be drunk. Since the men in the video are actors, we don't get to see that side of it. Obviously having sex with someone who is pretending to be drunk isn't rape.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 06:43 PM
2

had one of these guys had sex with this girl I would say it would be rape. I agree, except for the fact that her acting was so inconsistent that it would be hard to say. She only seemed seriously intoxicated part of the time. Half the time she was doing the fake drunk "omgI'msodrunk that's why I'm talking like a child" flirty thing.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 06:18 PM
1

I was still using the lifeboat metaphor. People get in as they come. First come first served or whatever. Either way, doing it based on gender isn't a fair way to do it.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:58 PM
1

How about simply, "Since deciding the value of an individual based on their gender is fucked up, everyone come all at once and help anyone that might need help."
/r/MensRights03/11/14 06:19 PM
1

I believe it's partly male bonding, partly "practice" and desensitization to rejection (under the guise of impressing other males), a very tiny part trolling, as you say, and a very tiny part is actual hopeful attempts to initiate conversation. I think it's fucked up to continue to do it when you know that it makes women uncomfortable, but I wouldn't remotely categorize it as harassment, nor do I think there is a way to ethically end it other than simply asking people to stop.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 07:00 AM
2

I didn't realize this was a reference, because I've heard that people really don't walk in L.A.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 04:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter