TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

verdis Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by verdis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Who believes this is really how reasonable people think?
/r/MGTOW15/09/18 04:48 PM
-3

Read the rest of the thread you sad, angry little man. All will be made clear...
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 09:09 PM
2

I appreciate your well-articulated opinion, and agree with much of it. My concern is that meeting absolutes with absolutes only forces both view points farther away from any meaningful discussion. Men are always aggressors, only women make false rape claims. Is your goal less of this kind of harmful dialogue or an environment where neither dichotomy is allowed. Because I don’t think you can get there with an “us versus them” mentality. Probably dumb of me to make this point in this subreddit tho…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 06:32 PM
4

Thanks for your response, that link was particularly interesting. I think there is a risk in accepting that men can’t make false accusations too. It vilifies all women, and exonerates all men. Which is a dangerous thing to do. Less for false rape accusations, which seem so heavily skewed to women, but for any dangerous, disgusting behavior towards the opposite sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 06:15 PM
-18

I don’t think you understood my point. All of the things you said may be true but men can also make false rape accusations.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 05:15 PM
13

I’m sorry that happened to you, it must be terrible to deal with.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 04:54 PM
-124

Quite a generalization.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 03:52 PM
-109

Isn’t this equally true for men?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 03:19 PM
1

It's been my experience that when someone resorts to childish personal criticisms of the person they are talking with they have either run out of valuable arguments to make or a critique their case received has hit home. I wonder which one it is? Minimizing the personal importance of reproductive rights for women by equating it to public transportation access is exactly the kind of oppression this article claims doesn't exist. Don't bother responding. I'm not going to waste any more time debatin…
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:09 PM
0

The things you are saying are true from an entitlement standpoint but they don't equate with the impact of having an abortion/not having an abortion for a woman. Owning something and walking instead of taking the bus isn't the same as carrying a pregnancy to term or not, or having a child if you don't have access to an abortion. That right to make those decisions about your body is the most fundamental and critical right a person can have. Like being able to legally defend yourself with a gun if…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:32 AM
0

If guns were reasonably price due to government subsidies and that allowed you to have a gun, and the subsidies were suddenly pulled and you could no longer have a gun even though you needed one, then yes. Obviously, it's a bad comparison because needed to use a gun to protect yourself is situational like the need for an abortion, but gun ownership is a lasting state.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 04:03 AM
1

If something is a human right, like the ability to control your own body, but exercising that right is inaccessible to you, due to cost, location, etc., that right isn't really there for you is it?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:34 AM
1

I have been responding to your main point throughout. I've clearly, repeatedly said that oppression happens at the individual level, and the need to avoid this supersedes your societal-level concerns.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:42 PM
2

First of all, the majority of American agree that abortion should be legal. Secondly, fortunately, we don't live in a country where the moral beliefs of the few trump the health and welfare of others. Usually. At least for now. Write to me in four years and we will see how different this conversation is.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:39 PM
1

You've stopped responding to my arguments and keep falling back on a dictionary definition that you like, a la high school debate, so there is no point in continuing this discussion. Suffice it to say I think you are missing the point to ignoring the impact not being able to get an abortion has on a woman, and if the government pulls funding for something they are exercising their authority and power by doing so.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 10:49 PM
0

It is to that woman, and all the other women in her shoes. Oppression isn't a social construct, it happens to people.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 10:41 PM
1

It's the same for a woman who needs an abortion. Your societal argument means nothing to that person.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 10:24 PM
0

Legal but inaccessible is the same as illegal for the woman who needs an abortion, no?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 10:03 PM
0

If funding to PP is suddenly taken away it restricts many women's access to abortion. That's oppression, but I believe we have covered this ground already.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:58 PM
-1

I think you are confusing human rights and legal rights.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:28 PM
7

It's been mentioned numerous times that restricting access to abortion limits a woman's control over her own body, which is a fundamental aspect of oppression.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:42 PM
0

You said you shouldn't have to pay for other people's choices. There are other comments that mention the important relationship between rights and laws. If something is legal, but difficult to get, you are still impinging on people's rights. Imagine if the only place you could legally buy guns in the US was in northern Alaska.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:40 PM
-2

And yet you would take away the choice of the rape victim? For financial reasons?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:29 PM
14

Because it's a fetus, not an unborn baby. I believe the rights of a woman to control her body trump the rights of any potential future baby. We may disagree about this. But abortions will take place regardless of our personal beliefs, so making sure they are legal, available, done safely and professionally, and rare is the compassionate choice.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:26 PM
1

I'm not aware of any women that chose to be raped.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:51 PM
17

Making this conversation about who is paying for abortion seems to be focusing on the wrong thing. The decision to have an abortion or not is a deeply complex, often painful, and personal one. A very important decision that cannot be taken back. In my view any discussion of abortion should start with that clearly in mind. Compassion and concern for the woman who is in this undesirable position, whether thru her choices or not, is much, much more important than where the money comes from, or one …
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:32 PM
33

Wouldn't it be nice if this were a competition with winners and losers. Life would be a lot easier that way. You are clearly deeply committed to your beliefs. It's been my experience that my deeply held beliefs are tempered when I talk openly with people who hold opposite beliefs. Maybe you would have the same experience if you met with people who work in the world of abortion services.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:59 PM
36

I truly hope you can understand the relationship between human rights and the laws that support them. Your arguments suggest you don't, which is unfortunate. I would encourage you to meet with people who support abortion rights, and who provide abortion services. I think you'll find the factors involved more nuanced than you seem willing to admit.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:53 PM
10

Being able to have an abortion isn't a benefit, it's a right. Taking away the largest provider of that benefit, without there being a replacement, is oppressive because it does stop people from having abortions they would have otherwise. That's pretty elementary.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:45 PM
18

But since they currently are then taking away PP funding reduces access to abortion, which oppressed women. You want to change the funding mix for PP, go nuts. But don't suggest suddenly cutting funding to a major abortion access point isn't harmful to women. Or that it's unreasonable for women to be upset about this.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:31 PM
48

Taking away access to abortion takes away a woman's right to control her own body. Not having the right to control your own body is the very definition of oppression. And Planned Parenthood is a critical point of access.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:17 PM
-14

So is this a woman-hating or Trump-loving post? Or both.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/16 07:38 PM
-17

r/thathappened
/r/MensRights18/12/15 06:26 PM
-6

Interesting piece, but not scientific. Stating your opinions are backed by research, and then only using anecdotes to support your opinion is not research.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/15 12:27 AM
-5

I'd be curious to see the research that supports "As a man, it is your job to take the risk of getting rejected."
/r/TheRedPill10/11/15 12:02 AM
-2

Differences between the sexes doesn't mean all men will have the same opinion about what it means to be a man.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/15 10:35 PM
-7

I'm not convinced that everyone here needs to have the same opinion about what being a man is.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/15 09:58 PM
-8

You mean TRP isn't real tolerant of dissenting opinions? Shocker.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/15 08:35 PM
2

I think this post embodies The Red Pill really well.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 03:13 PM
1

Made him?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter