TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vertr Archive

View 0 posts and 357 comments by vertr on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

From my perspective? Nothing. [...] Okay, sounds like we've changed your view then. I love it when the OP is a paper tiger!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:09 PM
8

I've probably researched more political distinctions/ideologies than the days you've lived! i'Ve BeEn ReSeArChInG tHiS lIkE fOrEvEr! Cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 09:00 PM
2

Self proclaimed leftist isn't actually leftist. More at 11.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 08:59 PM
5

You're literally admitting they are making up a narrative. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/22 08:58 PM
1

I'm not. I'm a guy. But cute personal attack kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 07:02 AM
12

-You can't keep a man -Your selection process sucks -You ask too much and bring to little -You are looking for a man that doesn't not exist You can't see how these are attacks? Have an ounce of self awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 12:37 AM
6

When they are judging human beings like cuts of meat from safeway. 🫠
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/22 07:04 PM
7

This guy is beyond the pale. Or possibly blind.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 04:53 AM
3

People in college are still kids. Their lives aren't stable, they are still maturing, they are still figuring life out. Anything OP concludes about life or dating from some random girl in college should be ignored just as if they referenced an experience from kindergarten.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 05:47 PM
6

Exactly... OP is just another dude who can't take responsibility for his own situation and feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 05:43 PM
2

These are mostly just strawmans with little nuance. Oh jesus, you still think a strawman can exist in a vacuum.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:01 AM
4

I'm a 6'4", semi muscular, electrician and still not good enough for a second date. I refuse to have dinner on the first date, have reasonable standards (don't date women under 5'6 or the obese) but yet I "have an ego." Right. I'm sorry but you saying you have "reasonable standards" and in literally the same sentence saying you refuse to have dinner on the first date contradicts your point all in one go. Shooting from the hip here, but I'm guessing it's because you're a tradesman or you don't ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:54 AM
6

It seems like you think cold-calling has more social importance than it does. People say a few words to each other and walk away without a good bye in public literally all the time. You're trying to change the context into something more significant than it is, and frankly sounds like a reaction from someone who might have issues interpreting social cues and norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 07:08 AM
1

Not sure what the point of that would be, but okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 05:31 AM
-1

Neither of you being able to muster anything to demonstrate this whatsoever begs to differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 05:30 AM
-2

You're just making a generalization, so no I'm not "absolutely wrong." You could paste some actual quotes for starters instead of hand waving.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 02:41 AM
5

Some guy stating a preference in a PPD thread, vs a guy in a situation who is angry his date treats him differently than others are totally different contexts. Obviously taboos exist and nobody is doubting that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 12:01 AM
3

Promiscuity - One of the core tenets of modern day feminism is preaching a lack of accountability. Women try to normalize promiscuity by using textbook shaming tactics: A woman's past is none of your business. You're just insecure. She's a changed woman. You're just a misogynistic incel. This has gotten so extreme to the point that even men who have very conservative values in regards of intimacy are still shamed for wanting a woman who also shares those values. I think how this normally comes u…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 11:53 PM
1

Those things aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 10:34 PM
4

The guy losing his shit over ghosting is clearly demonstrating he wasn't fit to date anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 08:22 PM
7

hold her "accountable" Right, this accountability is just a nicer way to say the guy is harassing her for rejecting him. Ghosting cuts that down.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 08:21 PM
1

asshole behavior? Calling ignoring someone "asshole behavior" seems a bit childish. If a homeless person starts trying to get cash from me in person, do I owe them an explanation or anything other than being brushed off? No. If a woman isn't interested they don't owe an explanation either. This is how society works at large, and men whining about not getting a response they want comes off as sour grapes for being rejected, not some higher dedication to decorum.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 08:17 PM
1

Post. Well shit I guess I better get reporting!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 06:56 AM
4

This sub should have a rule that people can only post one thread per day. This way they will put more thought into them instead of just doing drivebys every few hours like a certain individual tonight. Thoughts?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 06:50 AM
-1

Perfect example of this guy's lack of intellectual honesty. The post clearly generalizes women as a group. Proof: Women will almost never admit that they can be attracted to toxic men and often regularly are. This obviously and very clearly comes from a lack of ability to take responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 04:02 AM
1

I've had countless convos with women about the "guy who's perfect in every way except one" Because attraction isn't determined by reviewing an excel sheet of attributes and calculating if he's a winner. For both sexes it's complex and it changes over time. If they like one guy with one attribute and find it not attractive in another later on, they aren't lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:55 AM
0

In every post OP finds imaginary problems with the character of all women which he uses to justify his misogyny. Nothing to see here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:54 AM
7

Hold on, I never said women shouldn't snub who threaten them. I was generalizing the OP, which essentially states 'women are mean to men for no reason.' I think they are going for something like 'women should be better to unattractive men.' If that's the case, I guess I find this pretty boring, like they aren't going to date that guy so who cares? If the guy can't handle inane rejections, that's probably part of what she interpreted as unattractiveness in his personality in the first place. I'm …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 01:11 AM
7

Holy fuck you don't even understand how to quote someone. The more I interact with these guys the more I think they're just confused and think everyone else is wrong because they're just misunderstanding everything they read. Edit: reading the thread they write fake quotes all over the place. Puts these strawmen accusations in a much richer light. LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:52 AM
6

I clearly stated I was re-characterizing your argument. A strawman requires me to suggest you said something you didn't and then attack it. I did neither. You don't understand basic fallacies or rational reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:19 AM
5

Your OP is full of them, have an ounce of self awareness. I suppose this demonstrates that you are in fact trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:15 AM
4

It's an anecdote. If you don't agree with it explain instead of mischaracterizing their argument (your mischaracterization was also based on an anecdote so you can't bitch about this that much, plus your OP is full of them).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:13 AM
10

OP's actual argument: women should accept more emotional and physical risk in dating interactions because failed propositions hurt men's feelings too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:11 AM
7

I can guarantee that there's tons more women who start a conversation using "hey" than men. Sort of amazing how you completely miss the point and act like they are whining about low effort openers. You're responding to nothing. Why don't you respond to their actual argument: Around 80% of those men turned abusive, And this: That’s why women are abrupt with men we don’t know. We can’t tell by looking at you which of you are abusive or dangerous, and most in that environment are. Otherwise it appe…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:08 AM
1

I wasn't responding to an argument. I was responding to your fallacious attack.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:02 AM
12

You're just making up skewed numbers to suggest it's unlikely, but this ignores how human behaviors function. Fight or flight responses aren't based on reciting statistics, they are based on the situation one is in the moment and how they feel about it. The point is that if a man displays actions that make a woman feel unsafe, it's not surprising that she would snub him. Women don't deserve to be hated or looked down upon for their natural inclination to avoid danger even though it angers men. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 11:57 PM
8

Big strawman energy. You have no clue what a strawman is so maybe stop looking uninformed by waving it around. The amount of times these guys confuse sarcasm for a strawman blows my mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 11:35 PM
16

Your experience on this sub is super unique since North Africa and Middle East is probably the most hostile place towards women. So I'd say based on where you live your attitude is completely justified. Don't you think this being a thing anywhere shows the origins and justifications of this being the way women respond elsewhere? No doubt that some women get stalked in Canada as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 11:33 PM
1

way to many women don't have good communication skills them selfs.... Holy shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 08:01 PM
0

If you make a generalization, and immediately contradict it, it's not a very strong generalization. A generalization isn't free range for you to say whatever you want, but it appears you think it is. Holy shit you're calling out a strawman in another post and you don't even know what one is. Why do these geniuses always resemble their accusations? LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 05:35 PM
0

You make an assertion. Then minutes later you contradict that assertion. How does that look guy? LOL. 'I was on a date' 'Oh my date wasn't actually how I characterized it' Yeah FFS
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 08:09 AM
1

ts terrible advice because ADHD medication and antidepressants work It works because you become a speedhead. It fucks with your normal dopamine levels and eventually you pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 07:59 AM
1

Don't moderate your own thread. I'll message the actual mods kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 07:27 AM
3

Then why is every one of your threads is 'why do women do things that are not attractive to me???' Fuck dude it's transparent as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 07:24 AM
1

Humans have 10 toes. I met a person with 11 toes. Is that a contradiction? What is this dumb shit? If you make a generalization and immediately contradict yourself it's bunk as hell. I don't care if 'other people' whatever, you're not being honest with us and yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 07:22 AM
3

The girl I went out with put effort So you're contradicting your generalization in the title just like that? Close it up, we're done here!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:40 AM
6

Telling a woman "let's go out" and picking your favorite burger joint? How difficult is this exactly? It comes off like OP may not be good at taking social cues if you get my drift.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:15 AM
-2

Maybe they haven't figured it out yet. Seriously, your angle is that women know exactly what they want?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:14 AM
4

I mean if you want someone to take you out and take responsibility for taking you to bed, perhaps you should try dating guys? Hilarious how this keeps coming up in OP's threads and similar ones. OP is essentially baffled by female behaviors and norms and would be much more comfortable with a male personality in a female body.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:11 AM
3

The left absolutely hates men. A huge, fragile generalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 09:44 PM
2

Dem politicians are the Rings of Power showrunners? Who knew? Or you're just indiscriminately lumping discrete groups together because it supports your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 09:38 PM
3

I don't want a "more level social playing field." No shit, I said you were whining that one now exists. You're arguing for a zero sum game, and frankly that doesn't reflect the social reality or life in any way. It appears you are claiming the system doesn't currently work because it doesn't privilege you personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 09:28 PM
6

I feel like this is just whining that a more level social playing field means you are having trouble competing. Yearning for the days of a social caste system is fucking bizarre though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 08:17 PM
0

Its big business, politicians, and the rich These categories have demographics and the clearly lean towards men. E.g the US senate has 100 members. 24 of them are women. House of reps 123 women out of 435 members.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:39 AM
1

Are you just googling random shit? It's literally the the definition of patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:37 AM
1

Either because you fail at basic logic And yet all you have is a personal attack, and you didn't address what I wrote in the least. You invoke red herring while making one yourself. Typical, but fucking hilarious at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:19 AM
2

Not even remotely a strawman. Strawman requires one to suggest their opponent made an argument that they didn't and then attack it. There is no such suggestion in that post. They were simply responding.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 11:46 PM
-1

We pass laws advantaging women, not men. It's about who has control, not who is advantaged. Look at how many men are in positions of power in politics, society, business. A patriarchy can choose to advantage women, and if the men are still in control is remains a patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 11:41 PM
-1

Patriarchies use their power to benefit men, not women. It is about who has the control not who it benefits. But sure make up definitions on the fly. Patriarchies can choose to benefit women, that doesn't make them a matriarchy if men still control the social order.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 11:30 PM
2

Toxic masculinity doesn't exist. [...] just weakn and pathetic males and the opposite of what being a real man is . Literally proves it exists by attempting to gatekeep what a man is by using toxic terms. Do these guys possess any self awareness?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 11:23 PM
2

Right, this sub is a haven for guys to express overt misogyny that wouldn't fly anywhere else on reddit. I've seen the new mod in question do it as well. Fortunately reddit hunted down some of the worst offenders recently and their accounts were perma-banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 02:07 AM
3

Hi OP. I honestly think most people don't know that they know autistic people. What you're talking about is the problem of problems for autism in society. Typicals don't have empathy for autists and vice versa. I think it's akin to not knowing what it's like being in the body of the opposite gender, in the sense that you can imagine it, but you just won't ever get it no matter what you do. I'm not sure I'd call awareness initiatives 'virtue signaling' but an ineffective (but appreciated) attempt…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 01:58 AM
0

Thoughtful? You mean the reply where they gave up after the 2nd source when I linked like 7? I really don't give a shit about your petty drama. You didn't respond and you should have. If your excuse is that it wasn't good enough, whatever. I'm not saying she's always wrong, just that [..] I've seen you state something as fact based on your feelings that had 0 basis in reality No offence but I'm taking this opinion with a grain of salt. If you take a random unrelated opinion and dismiss it, yes y…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 11:54 PM
1

If someone is wrong once saying they are wrong about everything else is straight up stupid and fallacious. They wrote a thoughtful reply with points you should have responded to which you ignored. That's not the killshot you seem to think it is, and the way you are calling it out as a petty grudge is embarrassing yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 11:22 PM
1

I've seen you state something as fact based on your feelings that had 0 basis in reality Your opinion, and they aren't a moderator candidate anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 10:09 PM
3

I don’t care if you’re absolutely trolling all day as a regular poster if you can switch it off with the mod hat on. You don't care if mods don't follow the rules? It's like american policing I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 10:04 PM
0

Anybody notice how OP posts these rants about the things they dislike about women several times a week? Of course all of the problems are women's fault. Typical. Does that seem healthy to everyone? I thought RP was about getting your shit together, not behaving constantly triggered in public. Yet another example of a man who doesn't like how women communicate and that they essentially want to date men in women's bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 06:05 PM
13

Exactly, most of the triggered PPD boys are terminally online, and think everything they see on IG is representative of the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 08:04 PM
1

strawman Learn your fallacies son. It's just a generalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:10 AM
2

What an absurd generalization. Men don't want to be loved by women? I guess this is a solid litmus test for filtering out the robotic misogynists focused on possession rather than interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:08 AM
1

It doesn't appear that you even know what agency means 🤷‍♂️. Your 'women should just do what men want because it is better for society' schtick is long played out. It's just poorly masked conservative patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 03:49 AM
0

OP just hates that culture isn't perfectly fair to each sex and can't stand that it often enables the agency of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 09:43 PM
2

That guy doesn't even know what ad hominem is. He just likes to whine about school yard level name calling, not the actual fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 09:29 PM
6

One needs an opponent to have a strawman by definition. You appear to confuse generalizations with strawmen, but since every post in this sub opens with generalizations it's a worthless observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 01:13 AM
2

The exception is not the rule. Basic shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 09:22 PM
2

Those who operate only with generalizations tend to be a bit fuzzy with meanings to service their own biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 11:23 PM
4

A European relying on stereotypes and making generalizations? Not possible! /S
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 03:26 AM
0

Because she was in Harry Potter. Right, because attractiveness is 100% relative which is why we have threads like this where nobody can agree and goes round in circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 09:51 PM
4

It's extremely hard for men to learn. Stop generalizing all men when what you really mean is socially-disabled autists.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 07:52 PM
1

https://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/what-you-need-to-know-about-stimming-and-autism
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 06:52 AM
1

have gone out on a date with a man they had no intentions to ever have sex with It's like you think social interactions are set in stone before they even happen. Baffling.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 11:12 PM
0

That's how dating works. For you. Stop putting your own assumptions on everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 03:34 AM
2

Saying she’s “masquerading” because her preferences have changed? The fuck? You're encountering the extremely strange way that RP guys view women... not as humans, like an RPG character or some shit. Just characteristics and stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 03:33 AM
2

sometimes it makes me hate women… No misogynists here!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 03:31 AM
-1

She seems like a total catch. So you're judging her based on her interactions with one guy. That's absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 12:02 AM
2

But I’d that’s the case that’s a terrible way to go about things. It suggests a bias for Blue Pill narrative. All threads work like this regardless of orientation, if you agree with the premise of the thread respond to automod. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 07:40 PM
-4

But remember, boys, women are the empathetic and gentle sex. So you're just comparing her against a stereotype you hold, and blaming her for it? Maybe it's a shitty experience for him, but is it ethically wrong? Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 07:28 PM
1

lol, in your experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 01:50 AM
4

Both sexes are promiscuous. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 01:47 AM
3

Only if you were using it as an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 01:44 AM
6

Only guys new to TRP and lost tradcucks hate sluts, Alright... with time they accept and even appreciate them. Ah... because the they are sluts too! Like recognizing like and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 01:42 AM
7

It's about objective truth. Well that's hilariously naïve.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 11:58 PM
1

Edgy boy 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 02:46 PM
1

Yeah but you're supposed to be their advocate and helping them, and you're here publicly mocking them. Gross stuff. Consider what their response would be if they found out you wrote online about them, I'd guess negative. It calls into question your ability to serve them as a client.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 01:41 AM
2

TIL there are male prudes
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 01:04 AM
1

Agreed, in fact this sub is full of men saying it's easier for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 12:55 AM
0

Note: That's from the police report -- not a privileged conversation. Sure, whatever, but I'd say it's unprofessional as fuck for you to be discussing your own clients on a public forum.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 12:53 AM
3

More like attempts to emasculate men who try to appear hyper-masculine. Your attempt to connect 'bad people" with small penises is incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 12:48 AM
1

Take the conspiracy garbage elsewhere. Just another way for you to skirt personal responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 03:36 PM
2

Honestly trying to get inside the heads of the people you're attracted to is pretty big brained. Hey if autist game is your thing, do you. You're just not going to directly impress many with it So you immediately dismiss your own idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 02:03 AM
0

Your example isn't nuanced at all. You didn't respond to anything I said, so okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 01:59 AM
2

No you didn't. Flirting being a "sexual behavior" doesn't mean that all flirting must contain sexual content or have sexual intentions. I flirt with old ladies at the grocery store checkstand, it doesn't mean I'm trying to fuck them. Either you are being intentionally obtuse or you lack the ability to understand this simple nuance.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:55 PM
0

It does not appear that you understood what they said.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:33 PM
2

More like learn to read the social cues when it's appropriate or not. "Creepy" doesn't normally mean they are ugly, it literally points at behavior and most times it's not reading the room. E.g. I go to a party at a friend's house. We are sitting around listening to music drinking wine, very chill. Some guy shows up with vodka and starts getting shitfaced, is loud, tries to have arguments with people, etc. He hits on a girl there, and obviously she wasn't interested, and afterwards she said he w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:14 PM
4

The feminist movement has taken so many intelligent nice boys and scared the shit out of them so bad that they quake in terror at coming across as sexual. Some mental gymnastics to get from 'guy isn't flirting' to blaming the entire feminist movement for guy not having the balls to escalate. More of the same, generalized excuses for specific and solvable problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:12 PM
2

Reading female centered literature for the sole purpose of attracting women Nooo that's a perfectly normal thing for a guy to do that definitely would not tip off or weird out any women whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:11 PM
3

is choosing to blame women instead of his neurodivergence for his issues Perfect summary of 90% of the angsty guy posts on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:09 PM
1

Gesticulating in the direction of the Kinsey report isn't "doing research" you dolt. There being less virgins doesn't mean "women are sleeping around a lot now." You need an actual correlation to data instead of flinging around vaguely related facts and hoping they stick together. Your indication that you don't have a degree aligns perfectly to your inability to analyze and present factual information.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 11:21 PM
0

Because seeing your excessive replies in every active thread thread is stalking you, again to my point. But yes, I know I'm disrupting your MO of harassing women on here. Poor you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:19 PM
4

It’s a useless time sink Maybe it's time to reevaluate your amount of participation here then. You've spent quite an unhealthy amount of time just responding to this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:46 AM
1

I figured you would be that fast and loose.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 04:57 AM
2

Still no statistics!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 02:55 AM
8

Its called gossip. So you're admitting it's just rumors.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 01:36 AM
2

Radio silence
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 01:32 AM
5

Why would we bother collecting evidence? Most women do it these days. Kinda hilarious how these guys basically admit to generalizing this stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 01:32 AM
2

who’s says Chad has to be single? The assumption is always Chad gets to choose between casual or LTR. I’m sure many times, Chads juggle both and gets the best of both worlds: a loving wife, fun kids, and hot women on the side to keep life exciting. Right because chad is an idea, like uncle sam. They want to be able to invoke him in a certain way that suits their arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 12:17 AM
22

Chad. "Chad" is just a scapegoat for their frustration with their own status anxiety.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 12:12 AM
1

Right, settling doesn't have a negative connotation. If you settle, it means you simply found a correct status-match. The problem is these guys think they are high status but are actually low status. Thus the obsession with and jealousy of "chads."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 08:14 PM
2

The stuff about “n-counts” always makes me cringe. They just want to sex shame women who sleep with men who are above their status.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 08:11 PM
1

You are exactly one of those vile women Sure as hell looks like you are doing the bullying here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 08:08 PM
3

The entire point of this thread is that women do not empathize with men’s dating / romantic difficulties, which ironically you have proven perfectly. You don't understand what empathize means. It doesn't mean 'date lower status men.' I love how this guy's solution is always for women to date down. Uh why would they do that? The same reason I don't go to the store and buy shit for random people. What do I owe them? Jack shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 06:53 PM
15

What’s wrong with any of this if she’s happy? Seems like a women just enjoying life and casual sex when she wants it. As long as everything is consensual this literally hurts no one. [...] The point is what women call “happy being single” is not remotely what “being single” means for men because none of those things I listed are available to all but Chad tier men. Here's the literal quiet part loud: according to this guy women aren't allowed to be happy because it only matters if men are happy. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:14 PM
1

don't tell me what to do. Hilarious. If I knew I was talking to a small child I wouldn't have bothered.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:05 PM
6

I meant go out by yourself, check your excuses kid and grow up. This "check your privilege" shit is annoying as hell, I'm not bragging or anything like that, simply trying to help.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 05:56 AM
4

lol alright boss. Join a church, a grange, play softball, figure out something to do with people that isn't whatever you do in the country currently. Hell even go to the next town over, find the most popular bar and get a bit drunk and make random friends. If it doesn't work, go another town over the next time. Meeting women in person is fucking easy mode. P.s... I grew up in a small town. I brought myself here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 03:23 AM
2

Def not a socialite. I put effort into putting myself out there when I was dating, participate in an amateur sport, sort of spectrumy, etc. Not a chad by any means.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 03:17 AM
5

I'd buy that there are less happening, but an absolute desert of dating opportunities that some guys talk about on this sub? Absolutely not. Anecdotally 95% of the guys I know have coupled up by 35, and some of them are strange dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 03:11 AM
-2

Because Chad's an idiot really, and it shouldn't be the life goal of men to become that. I think we can narrow down that redpillers are angry because neurotypical women aren't generally attracted to autists.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 02:58 AM
17

I think I'm starting to understand why these redpill boys think nobody out there is ever coupling up...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 02:53 AM
-5

Do these guys just rattle these off without even reading context?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 12:22 AM
2

In the only pics I've seen, he looked pasty and bloated. Exactly, the poster above you seems to think attraction can be literally determined by taking a few random statistics about someone and if they are above certain thresholds they are then considered attractive. Completely ignoring the forest for the trees. And yet, Musk has strange mannerisms, isn't an eloquent speaker whatsoever, and often looks like total shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:52 AM
1

Really, your response is the projection card? Calling someone else's argument a "conspiracy theory" is literally ignoring nuance and a dog whistle. We don't need this kind of childish dismissal and gaslighting. I understand now why the OP gave up on you, they detected this as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:53 AM
2

I understand women just fine. [Proceeds to explain them as if they are extraterrestrials or animals]. Sure buddy, I don't think I need to add anything here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:49 AM
2

"Men only want one thing and it's fucking disgusting" Christ you don't even understand the concept of humor. Oh, so basically be like women. Wild interpretation. Women in our gynocentric society have been brainwashed to think they are the defacto "good" and men are "bad", and if we could just get men to act more like women, the world would be so much better! Can't wait to see you on Dating on the Spectrum. Seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:47 AM
1

Yet another one suggesting that existence of nuance in communication completely baffles them. There's a poster on here who brings up every chance they get how fat they think most women are, calls them grotesque names, and mocks their bodies. They don't do this for men. Am I to believe this person isn't a misogynist? That would be absurd. Context matters. That's not a conspiracy or a dog whistle, it's a clear message.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:27 AM
1

My favorite is when they are like "oh I don't hate women, I would just prefer if they had the personality of a man." Uh er, wait a second.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:54 AM
3

SMH. Basically "I don't hate women, they are comparable to a dangerous animal." Proceeds to spend entire days explaining to others how much they hate women. Okay then.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:48 AM
1

You just described every feminist ever. [...] I have yet to see a trending hashtag of #womenaretrash or #killallwomen Reaffirming my belief these guys have zero understanding of culture, or basic human concepts like irony, tongue in cheek, sarcasm, rhetorical effect, etc. No concept of nuance, just everything taken 100% literally. Hilarious, but fucking sad they live in such a constant state of confusion, and nobody understands them. No wonder you hate women, they are completely outside of your …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:41 AM
1

That guy gets banned consistently and alternates between accounts so they can continue explaining how much they hate women. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 02:56 AM
0

I'm convinced this account is not interested in debate whatsoever and is only interested in explaining the myriad of ways they detest women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 02:54 AM
2

Yeah yeah I know try to convince yourself that you're really such a nice guy in person but it's an obvious lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:19 AM
1

Hey you made a reply without misogyny, there's hope for you! It's pretty simple really, you act like shit around women, they no like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 10:19 PM
1

buttergolems [..] Being fit is difficult and requires self discipline and awareness. Something in very very short supply with American women in particular. [..] For the love of god, this coddling and deification of fat women (hi Lizzo) is a fucking cancer. Nice to see the putrid stench of your toxic misogyny back in the sub. /s Again it's no wonder why women aren't flocking to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 09:48 PM
3

This just in: only the flaired comments count! I'll stick with the old fashioned way of reading what people say to judge their position thanks. Your suggestion here is absurd as most people use custom flairs that don't indicate alignment. You aren't even flaired son.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 10:31 PM
4

They don't have trouble finding women. As far as I can tell, most of the men who chime in to ppd threads with their own personal experiences and insights about (successfully) dating are redpill men. Are we even reading the same sub? Rose-colored glasses and all that. This sub is undeniably full of red-pill men who struggle with dating and are not shy about expressing it. From OP: As if it isn’t obvious men struggle infinitely more to find partners. Yeah they aren't struggling at all LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 08:45 PM
2

Yeah they seemed to miss this from their own link: Although androgens have been extensively studied, their role in sexual functioning is poorly understood.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 02:11 AM
2

address the post instead of the poster. Re-read your reply, then take your own advice. What a hilarious lack of self-awareness on display.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 04:30 AM
1

This should help you with your problem: https://www.ivpress.com/there-s-a-teenager-in-my-house
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 02:18 AM
1

Interesting self-diagnosis. You should get that checked out. You appear to use terms completely independently of their meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 02:09 AM
1

You are using a cheap dictionary definition of ad hominem, which is not complete. Fallacious ad hominem reasoning occurs where the validity of an argument is not based on deduction or syllogism, but on an attribute of the person putting it forward. You are missing the nuance here. In your example they were not suggesting the validity of their argument was wrong because of the personal attacks. They weren't even responding to the person in question, they responded to someone who asked for a summa…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 01:23 AM
2

The issue is that there is no empirical proof that women’s attraction follows the Pareto principle Good response, had a good laugh at the other poster referring to the pareto principle wikipedia as if that could be universally applied as a counter point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 12:51 AM
1

insanely poorly baked lie [..] Sex assault stats hysteria [..] posting something here is adorably naive. Yeah this sub isn't toxic at all 🤣. No wonder you can't see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 12:44 AM
2

ad hominem attacks Namecalling !== ad hominem. If I were to say: "Joe is wrong and an idiot" = not ad hominem. "Joe is wrong because he's an idiot" = ad hominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 11:19 PM
4

IMO logic is a tool, neither good nor bad. Premises IMO can be good or bad, but logic is just a tool to reach conclusions from premises. I'd also argue tools are good. Both aid human civilization in numerous positive ways. Saying either are good doesn't mean that you support all possible uses of them. There can exist 100% logical arguments for Nazism, In a conversation about logic you can do better than this. My premise of logic being good is that I'd prefer people use correct logical skills bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 05:06 PM
5

Exactly, most of the guys who use 'logic' against women in real life situations are using it as a method of control. "Why didn't she do X be cause it was the logical thing to do" in a situation where there are thousands of options is a recipe for building unnecessary contempt. The hidden premise that logical = good. Based on what? I'd say that logic is good, but applying it in inappropriate situations is not good. Most of the time I see it brought up by RPers they don't understand the first thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 04:28 PM
2

You're confusing two distinct claims and I've never encountered that one. If you want to argue with me find a more interesting topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 06:07 AM
6

The whole point is people can’t filter shit. Fixed it for you. Honestly though I think the situation you're responding to is mostly due to a lack of experience, not a built in failure of one gender or another. All the backlash you say is a feature not a bug. I take it you're not RP, but I agree, the whiney boys on this sub actively hostile to women are getting filtered out and that is by design.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 04:33 AM
19

All of y’all’s issues could honestly be saved with a 100 question survey at the end of the first date. Can't wait to read the threads of the guys who get grilled like this and then blame women for dating being hard for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 03:34 AM
0

After reading you wreck several of these dolts just wanted to note I appreciate your infinite patience!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 02:15 AM
2

Pretty absurd to suggest women don't and can't do those things. You just have a sexist bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 02:05 AM
0

Direct hit!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 01:56 AM
5

Then why are you pretending to care?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 01:27 AM
7

Why don't you do an actual poll instead of just generalizing some random comments you read one time?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 01:26 AM
4

What if I told you that things don't have to be the fault of an entire gender, either one really.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 01:23 AM
4

That's a cute generalization you made there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 09:43 PM
1

Not true whatsoever. I can tell just reading this you haven't spent 5 mins reading anything trp related. Just by virtue of doing one of the things they advise, lifting, you have a much better chance at getting sex. I think you would have significant trouble finding any human to contest the idea that working on physical fitness would make someone more attractive to the opposite sex. It's a layup, and doesn't really contest the statement you quoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 09:39 PM
1

You don't think men constantly referring to women with negative terms all over this sub isn't toxic? It's not only toxic if people have their minds changed or something. A guy wrote to one of my comments earlier that women are "vapid creatures." I'm a guy, it's not going to change my mind, but it's definitely toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 09:31 PM
1

Why are you making assumptions about what would surprise me? I'm not very interested in FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:35 PM
-5

Alright, I'll give you a point for that one, thanks for conceding the rest though.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:25 PM
1

It's almost like extremist groups that say extremist things are wrong!? Thanks for showing the standard redpill lack of self awareness though.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:24 PM
-2

Nothing will stop women from playing games. But don't sit and complain that men have to counter women's game playing with their own games. All human social interactions are games. So again, this as usual falls down to lack of social understanding and awareness. I don't care about some situation you made up about women complaining. Have some self awareness, you are complaining. When you're used to privilege, equality feels like oppression. Women have so much privilege in the SMP/RMP that any atte…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 06:51 PM
1

OP, this sub is not representative of men out there. Bingo, this sub manages to capture the bitter dejected men (with some exceptions) who are incapable of taking personal responsibility for their situation and choose to blame an entire sex on their problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 04:27 PM
0

Because dating would just be so easy if women would quickly submit to these beta males! Take note women! /s that women weren't such vapid creatures that need such a high level of "gaming" to be interested in a man. This is exactly the kind of misogyny that turns women off. I can't help but think this kind of guy thinks the ideal dating environment is one where he captures a woman in a cave and claims her by force. His real problem is the social aspect of dating is too baffling for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 04:22 PM
-6

You just couldn't help yourself. Also... whoosh.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 12:49 AM
-1

Because it's not controversial You're sooo close. So if they are not controversial, one would say those are not meaningful points of contention, throwaways if you will? Not the "biggest issues" if you didn't bother to take the time to support them being so.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 12:17 AM
2

Notice how much effort you expended writing about women's problems in your view versus the throwaways about men. You threw the stuff in about men in order to pretend to be fair, but it's transparent where you think the actual problem is. Your view is not actually that men just need to work on themselves, you believe the primary problem for men in dating is women's behavior. Your third point literally boils down to "women are fat!"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 12:05 AM
10

Next OP will blame women for not being on the app enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 12:04 AM
2

Now to address the inevitable "why do you care?" posts: for the same reason I am pro-choice despite abortion having essentially no impact on me. I think there is inherent value in recognizing challenges that people outside of the groups you identify with face, and recognizing truth. Hey maybe they're not a misogynist. They're trying to pretend for a moment at least. In my opinion the three biggest issues plaguing modern day dating are: Oh dear. Entitlement and unrealistic standards of modern day…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 11:59 PM
3

Wow fucking direct hit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 11:52 PM
4

Exactly, this can't be stated enough. OP's entire post is inferring correlation where there is none. If a woman only finds a small percentage of men attractive, it's not automatically the same type of guy you see as popular on social media. It's disturbing that their view of the dating world is that it literally maps 1:1 with the tinder model.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 11:50 PM
2

Put effort into learning the social cues of neurotypicals. Failed a lot, but eventually learned how to deal with people, get past failures, etc. A few just dated other autists. If you are genuinely looking for ideas dm me your situation and I can give you insight from my own experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 03:58 AM
1

Sure you are. You're just as "pro choice" as the republicans from walkaway are ex-progressive. From you, today: Murdering your kids also doesn't affect me, but I'm still going to fight against your right to do that. If all of your arguments take the form of a pro-lifer, I'm going to believe the preponderance of evidence over the words of a known troll. I've noticed your schtick across several accounts, don't you have any other way to spend your time?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:14 AM
1

The thing is, I'm actually pro choice. Obvious bullshit. Don't concern troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 09:03 PM
13

Source: redpill imagination
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 04:46 AM
-2

You're just generalizing redditors having conflicting opinions, this is irrelevant to 'leftists' unless you are trying to make a new, untrue definition for the purposes of pushing a fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 10:11 PM
5

But it's not backed by "Science". Just because someone does a study doesn't make that study truth. I can't count how many times I've seen RPers on here cite a study, but come up with a conclusion the study itself doesn't mention in any way, and then conclude these studies agree with the redpill philosophy. These studies are thrown around like myths in the sub and function like them as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 04:31 PM
3

You're confusing the meaning of what statistics mean what.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 03:28 PM
0

Don't strawman. It's rude and fallacious.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 04:59 AM
2

Of course literally everyone won't end up with someone if they want to, but most? Of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 04:54 AM
-2

That's a myth of the redpill to justify their lack of success. Most everyone else finds it is in fact roughly evenly distributed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 04:25 AM
2

Women always see the worst possible explanation for men's actions. Have you read this sub? It goes both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 12:03 AM
–

Source of quote?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:46 PM
6

Most of the things men say about "Chads" and "tingles" are projection Not sure I'd say the chad stuff is projection per say, it seems like an out-group set of myths they use to justify their positions in their perception of the social order. Even the OP is more of the same, an absurd justification of their status, e.g. 'its better to be less attractive!' Yeah, sure buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 03:15 AM
0

Look at usernames when you reply, I didn't make any points...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 06:45 PM
3

They keep posting the same old numbers because it's the only one that agrees with their narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 06:39 PM
5

You keep pointing at a two+ year old study. Current stat: Pro-choice identification increased by nine percentage points to 61% among women https://www.npr.org/2022/06/03/1102872199/gallup-poll-pro-choice-roe-v-wade-supreme-court
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 06:14 PM
1

RemindMe! June 26, 2027 Considering this is a one day old ban evasion account, you're never gonna get this boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 05:18 PM
1

Funny how the only move you have is to attempt to cajole people. Boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 01:46 AM
–

The results of a policy are irrelevant to a demographic's opinion on it. Get smarter.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 12:24 AM
0

Oh sure forcing people to pay support for kids they don't want is a-ok right lmfao Hard pivot to whataboutism. Shocking
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 11:23 PM
1

Several of the justices who ruled to overturn Wade said in their confirmation hearings that 'Wade was safe' or 'settled law' so not sure how you could rely on this sort of argument going forward in earnest.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 07:29 PM
–

The majority of men are not going to complain about women keeping their legs closed Maybe not the majority, but see the content of this sub for men who can't stop whining about women not fucking them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 07:27 PM
7

We don't need that logic here!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 07:18 PM
0

Sure, throw more random feelings in there. Who cares what they mean!?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:55 PM
0

The gall on this kid to call me delusional when they don't understand basic statistics 🤣. The point is to punish and avoid people who are in favor of taking women's rights away. Normal non-sociopathic people should avoid dating republicans anyway, but especially now.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:01 PM
8

Jesus christ, shame and gratefulness are not opposites.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:20 PM
8

The redpill boy syndrome.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:13 PM
1

Men do not have the right to opt out of fatherhood, therefore it is only fair and just that women should be denied that right as well. Uh ya, ya can. Gay men everywhere do it every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:13 PM
1

Learn what "majority" literally means. For the slow boys: Definition of majority 1a: a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:11 PM
7

Women are gonna be even more selective in who they have sex with now. Exactly, women don't have sex with republicans ever again.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:09 PM
1

All humans lie about everything. So what? They also tell the truth about stuff too. Women don't universally lie about what they are attracted to, you just don't understand what they are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:37 PM
2

Whoosh.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:36 AM
2

That or they have social problems they haven't figured out how to overcome. I used to have a friend who was successful with women, but he was autistic and abusive as fuck and a lot of women just straight up told him to fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 03:28 AM
1

There have been a few women that have come forward as you. It's almost like you can't make generalizations about this kind of thing...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 03:09 AM
2

Lol actually read the thread kid. Plenty of women saying they like gentle only which invalidates the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:25 AM
2

So there's three options. A woman liking both, rough, or gentle. OP concludes that if a woman likes both then they are right because they think men should be rough in order to be good lovers. Where as both could mean "either or" and that's what most of the comments actually say, essentially 'no preference.' OP concluding 'no preference' means "rough is best" is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 12:01 AM
2

My CMV is "not being dominant will make a man a bad lover" If women like both that doesn't mean they require both. The comments are full of women saying they don't like dominant men as well, you just ignore those. So again, you just look at any answers, no matter what they say, and conclude you're right. The actual true answer is that people like different things and a generalization is usually wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 09:58 PM
5

Edit: The comments so far are some variation of "women like both", which reaffirms my view that a man that isn't dominant won't be a good lover. Well this is some big brain thinking here. In other words, no matter what they say you would have your view remain the same. Dishonest CMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 09:24 PM
1

Then be more tactical
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 03:43 PM
1

Being more confident isn't going to make them become more skillful at communication. Because it's the inverse of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 05:58 AM
3

Maybe they are, but we don't know. Lots of people think they are ugly and aren't, they ruin their shit with bad confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 05:18 AM
1

Most guys try shooting at their level. The guys on this sub who are struggling are obviously not "most guys." Because most guys don't struggle with women this much.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 04:52 AM
13

How the fuck would a study about sexlessness be done if not self-reported? Lol. It's such a pointless thing to point out. Exactly, because those guys want studies that confirm their own biases only. The OKC studies contained self reported data too, but that's fucking gospel for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 02:48 AM
-1

Long term I think a lot of women will realize that the thing they called "misogyny" was actually just slightly less privilege than they were used to. Nah plenty examples of men on this sub who are hateful of women. This is overly reductive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 02:44 AM
-1

Come on dude, you're "chicken or the egging" yourself into crippling social situations. I had so many times when I awkwardly asked people out as a clueless autist, but you know what? Sometimes they said yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:54 AM
3

Yeah it's wild how the incel crowd generalizes their experiences to all men. Shit, most guys I know are successful with women, the autists too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:52 AM
1

People like having stuff in common, women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:50 AM
2

Yeah exactly, women don't look at guys like a baseball player with stats. They look at them based on how you make them feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:48 AM
1

Neither. More like learning a skill with a lot of rules that you don't have a manual for. Here's a post I just wrote with some ideas: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/vdt2g2/one_of_the_biggest_reasons_men_will_continue_to/icnmts6/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:46 AM
1

Unless you are dating an autistic virgin!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:45 AM
1

Gotcha, here's the thing, don't worry about meeting women for now. Worry about developing your social skillset even further (which it sounds like you are doing). If you are autistic it can be hard to notice the social cues, so your goal needs to be to learn new ones. If someone makes a joke or says something you don't get, just laugh and be honest that you didn't understand and ask what they meant. Then you learned a new little trick, and probably a joke or something to say to smooth that cue ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:42 AM
1

I know you're half joking but if you are a clever autist you can have better charisma than the normies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:38 AM
1

Uh what? If there is an excess number of men that means there are gonna be some that don't pair up. The dating pool is dynamic. As in people enter and leave it all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:35 AM
2

Do you have playful conversations with people at work? Honestly the nuances of dating are just exaggerated social nuances.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:17 AM
3

You don't need to be your own worst enemy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:15 AM
2

I also love how it hasn’t occurred to you that this bitterness is actually an effect of the constant rejection rather than the cause. Pretty pathetic mental gymnastics to blame your lack of success on women instead of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 06:27 AM
5

Their definition is actually pretty fucked up, the woman can't get value or have fun, or have a child, in other words she can have no agency whatsoever in the act for it to count. That's some rapist level shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 02:02 AM
14

No wonder those guys never get laid, they are playing on hard mode! Guy takes condom out, pulls a paper form out and goes: "am I transferring any value to you? No? Could you sign here quick, I need this to count as actual sex." Woman: "uh err I'm going to put my pants on."
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 01:26 AM
0

Your account is literally you bitching about women every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 06:30 AM
-1

So you're saying all the guys who come on here and whine daily about women are actually really successful daters? Lol okay kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 06:17 AM
-3

Talking about their dating woes makes them misogynists? Nope. Saying misogynistic things makes them misogynists. E.g. making inaccurate generalizations about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 04:23 AM
3

Glad you didn't address this Because you literally played the childish game of "I know what you are but what am I?" Why would I address something that stupid? The point remains, you seem isolated and unaware of what's going on out there in the real world, and this is causing you to make statements that don't represent the social reality. The point was, grandma DID NOT have 1000+ guys boosting her ego weekly because her social circle was limited. Because this isn't common, and you say you don't g…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 03:43 AM
0

Yeah, let's ignore studies You didn't provide any studies, and the study I mentioned does not share or support your conclusion. and use ad hominem attacks You don't understand what ad hominem is. I didn't argue you were incorrect because of a flaw in your character. You literally cited "common sense" as a source, so you deserved to get ribbed. People were more socially isolated before social media. Hence the "social" in social media. What are you even saying. Social media doesn't make people aut…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 03:25 AM
-5

Common sense, various polls and data studies I'm sorry but this is stupid. Don't pretend like you have citations when you literally just have that old ass OKC study and your biases. You seem terminally online because you seem to operate under the assumption that most people are socially isolated. Also attention does not equal ego inflation nor does it equal a woman getting dates with the type of person they want, you seem to conflate terms easily. My argument is the market value hasn't changed, …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 02:57 AM
0

I'd say you going on social media and seeing a few examples is making you think this is much more common than it actually is. I've done a ton of dating and know a lot of people, insecurity is still all over the place.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 02:29 AM
-1

Red herring fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 11:30 PM
12

Dating women is hard due to the abundance of simps artificially inflating women’s market value. Because dating was super easy before that! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 10:56 PM
-2

Because the the majority those posts come from bitter guys who are unsuccessful at dating and they make that very clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 10:55 PM
2

Whether or not you want to acknowledge it, every guy who has success with women outside of celebrities and politicians are Red Pilled whether consciously or unconsciously. It’s simply fact, it’s all based on well documented psychology. This is some wildly fallacious nonsense. First it's just a huge generalization that you throw some confusing exceptions into, then you say it's "well documented psychology." If it's so well documented you should have no trouble citing some sources that state exact…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 12:35 AM
-2

Right, it seems like OP is mostly just offended that their values are associated with a pejorative term.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 12:28 AM
0

You have women out here having empty hook ups, cheating, racking up their body counts just as much as men if not more. Who gives a shit who is sleeping with who and how much? This is pure misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 04:41 AM
0

It's possible to be a misogynistic woman, and it appears from your views that may be one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 08:42 PM
-1

Women’s movement is to blame. So Women wanting equal rights is why men are misogynistic? This is literally misogyny, and frankly absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 07:11 PM
0

I follow RP but I was never willing to put in the massive amount of effort it take to get women Wild stuff, pry yourself out of your mancave and get a social life.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 05:50 PM
3

This rigid, self centred and condescending way of communicating is off putting when trying to build social connections. This is why a lot of autistic people struggle with building relationships. I've noticed a lot of RPers think their failures are always down to their statistics: height, social standing, salary, whatever. They completely ignore that women like guys for their personality, how they think about things, how they handle situations, how they spend their time, and so on to the point wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 05:47 PM
2

What will RP do once they can no longer blame Hollywood for misguided ideas about how to pursue women? They will blame women of course!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 05:32 PM
1

it's not so different from feminism. Sure, if you don't grok feminism at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:11 AM
2

Let's organize a marathon, but we will tell some contestant that it's a 100 meter sprint, and we will hide the finish line and people will shout random direction to contestants. And now we have random junkies passing the finish line before Olympic marathon runners. It's not a competition, roll another random analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:10 AM
2

Woosh.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 06:09 PM
5

Literally the title of this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 07:52 AM
-1

Its funny how when ever you blame women for anything its misogyny, but again women are above all criticisms and accountability. As its really men who are at fault for well everything. It's like you are only capable of speaking in weak generalizations. Guess what? A group is not responsible for your own situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 07:35 AM
6

Then what's with the constant complaining about women and not taking responsibility for their own failures? Baffling.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 05:38 AM
8

There's an interesting history of men's movements, for example when I was a kid my dad went to "Promise Keepers" which was a culty christian group, but at least they preached a couple good values like taking responsibility for your own shit so you can take care of your family. Today we just have guys like OP whining about women which nothing more than thinly veiled misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 04:06 AM
16

But that doesn’t mean you should condemn all women. Exactly, it goes from them feeling sorry for themselves, to blaming their problems on women. Why isn't RP more about men taking responsibility for their own problems?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 03:58 AM
6

I think how this can help people on the spectrum is by learning the 'script' of human behaviors and conversations. When I was young I did it by watching a lot of MSNBC and while not being humorous (unless you are on the other side of the aisle I suppose) it taught me a lot about how conversations are transactional, and a lot of ways to smooth over interactions that would otherwise be awkward. Eventually I got good enough with women to get a lot of dates, and my job became me being on and running…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 12:15 AM
3

^ RP defeatism. When the only solution they will accept is to blame women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 12:09 AM
1

You either can't charitably interpret their argument [...] I understand that his argument is bullshit. Are you actually this dense? You can't even repeat back what they said without changing it and coloring it. Wanting to be physically and emotionally intimate with someone is not one of them. Every human behavior is influenced by culture. Every single one.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:58 PM
7

Exactly, OP is just a generalization people make about dating culture, but it's not a rule whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:57 PM
1

No you did not. You seem confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:40 PM
2

If I've learned anything from this thread it's that RPers have extremely poor reading comprehension and somehow think OP is saying wanting a relationship is like a desiring a Ferrari.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 03:34 AM
2

I still don't believe an inate human need can be on par with wanting nice things. You either can't charitably interpret their argument or are aren't capable of understanding it. Whether you agree with it or not they were suggesting some human behaviors are driven by social cues from others. Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 03:30 AM
3

You obviously have some Psychological issues if you equate having a girlfriend to a Ferrari, which is a luxury item which most will never be able to afford. Here's what they said: this is still the equivalent of wanting to buy a ferrari because everyone else is rocking one It does not appear that you are able to actually interpret the intent of what they wrote, they could have said any make, or object or anything whatsoever that people desire instead. The point still stands. Don't get hung up on…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 03:23 AM
1

"Just learn platitudes and be a worker drone, bro." Don't make fake quotes, they didn't say that, or intend it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 03:21 AM
1

This just in ladies, according to this genius you can just choose not to get raped!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 01:40 AM
4

Is there anything a woman can do with her vagina that doesn't enrage PPD? It's almost like everything they have to say about women is sexist!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 05:47 AM
1

Women don't dig whiney unconfident guys. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 09:20 PM
2

Perfect example of OP's hypocritical views on empathy. They have none, but expect it from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 03:27 PM
2

You’re pointlessly talking in circles here. None of this speaks to any of the points in OP. Now here is your actual MO. They respond point by point to your post, then you completely dismiss it and say those things don't apply to the OP? Uh, ya because they were replying to your sub comment. You are dismissing them in bad faith, which you do multiple times in this thread when people get to the heart of the matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 03:22 PM
2

You being triggered easily by terms and then ignoring their point doesn't make them wrong. More dishonesty on your part. Their point: you are unhealthily obsessed with sex and base too much of your emotional well-being on it. You portend that's the same for all men, but it's actually your own dysfunction.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 06:39 AM
1

However show me a man without any boundaries I will show you a man that is weak. This is not the same as suggesting that a man 'should rule.' Your ideas are inconsistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 04:37 AM
4

Male suicide is the example you’re looking for, not “casual sex.” You're just making a wild guess that they don't empathize, and it doesn't pass the gut test imo. Another lazy ass “can’t get your dick wet!” post added to the pay no mind list. I didn't suggest this whatsoever, you are being intentionally dishonest. If that's not what you mean by empathy then explain, but the force of your post seems to be that you think women don't empathize enough with sexless men and they should do something ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 04:29 AM
2

The inability for of women to feel empathy for anything men (and only men) experience remains shocking to me but no longer surprising. I don't even understand the context in which this empathy is supposed to happen in your mind. Given your other comments, it seems like you think empathy means they should have sex with you, which frankly demonstrates that you don't understand what empathy is. To have empathy does not require action. Also that's literally the worst game imaginable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 03:46 AM
1

You are being intentionally dishonest by deflecting from the religious basis of your views. Why lie?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 03:40 AM
2

I have a feeling you’re the only one who feels peace in a household like that. Exactly, that poster is clearly stating that they are an abuser in their relationship. 'Just let me make all the decisions and everything will be great' is the type of thing dictators say. Disgusting really.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 03:36 AM
2

In not one word in the whole paragraph did I ever mention anything about religion. Don't be absurd, only christians say dumb misogynist shit like this: Woman was made for man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 03:02 AM
1

You ignored the entire point. If you mean they ignored your absurd generalizations, sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 02:50 AM
3

Also OP: everyone should be as unhappy as I am or it's not fair!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 01:14 AM
6

he doesn't want to hear women's reasons he just wants to whine about how we have it so much easier because we could have sex at any time so our opinions don't actually count waaaaah He sure whines about women lacking empathy for men while at the same time lacking it entirely for women. A self reflection if anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 01:09 AM
11

Yeah OP is terminally unsatisfied, check post history.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 01:04 AM
2

Sorry, not being accusatory, was meant more playfully. I'm probably similar to you but I see a lot of RPers saying cringey shit on here that is embarrassing as a guy so I tend to side with the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 07:17 AM
1

Funny the whole RP thing is about the chase and gender roles, but you want to get asked out? This is one area I'd side with them, when I've been asked out it muted my interest in them. Probably because I was young, but oh well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 07:08 AM
1

There's a great monologue in the Amazon show Outer Range about a character who buys a lot of pornographic art because of how it gave him a buzz or whatever. He bought a lot more and then realized the effect was gone, concluding that it's better to not see everything and then the effect returned after buying more tasteful examples. The mysteriousness is the same shit in attraction. You think you want that, but when push comes to shove I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 06:48 AM
1

Ouch
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 06:41 AM
3

Why can't they be just like boys but with female bodies?! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 12:26 AM
5

Average women wanting to lock down tall handsome millionaires/celebrities/athletes is not a struggle. It's delusion. What an active imagination you have. Must be terminally online.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 12:22 AM
1

I'm a guy you numbskull.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:07 AM
2

I'm not surprised that people who speak almost entirely in generalizations aren't able to muster up any self-awareness whatsoever. Then again these are people who sex-shame women while at the same time trying to seduce them and then post about it online like it's an actual confusing situation that they aren't successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:14 AM
1

Typical, you can't handle your emotions and you think it means you can behave however you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 01:27 AM
13

Especially when half those men are fucking women but they feel the right to judge women who fuck men. Direct hit! It's strange how this behavior is so ubiquitous in the sub yet I rarely see it called out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 12:26 AM
1

I would wast my time with an essay explaining obvious points. Okay, next time just don't comment instead of jumping up their ass to harass them about what they are going to do in your imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 12:21 AM
1

The generalizations give it away.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:41 AM
3

I absolutely hate it on here when women are asked questions and then accused of being liars when our answers don't line up with the preconceived notions of the asker. That's because most if not all questions from RP guys are asked in bad faith in order to justify their lack of success in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 11:18 PM
1

These RP geniuses don't realize anecdotes aren't useful for anything other than confirming their own biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 04:41 AM
1

an aesthetic body is of great power therefore entails great responsibilities This is the most cringey hilarious thing I've read all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 01:08 AM
1

That's because the RP mindset requires one to suspend ordinary rationality and believe in a set of generalizations about how people are. Your example demonstrates how fragile the generalizations are, and how they don't actually reflect reality, they just are designed to cater to their existing biases. You can see the RPers all over this sub repeating the same generalizations in order to reinforce their belief in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 03:42 AM
3

Shooting in the dark is always a losing tactical proposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 06:13 AM
2

I don't believe the point of the thread was to regurgitate Russian propaganda verbatim...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 05:59 AM
4

What do you expect from guys who believe in objectification of women as their total life philosophy?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:57 PM
5

Yeah, they shot themselves in the foot completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:56 PM
3

Oh wait- relationships are something that happens in real time and in real life, not textbooks or articles. Says the person who was trying to compare it to literal factual information in math. Selfawarewolves level shit here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:56 PM
3

You can't be forced to pay for someone else's kid. Watch out, you're bouncing off a RP myth that they will endlessly defend with fallacy because their ideology depends on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:55 PM
2

Being “repulsed” is sad It's because they are expressing their frustration with being unable to control women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:53 PM
2

Men are romantics pretending to be realists. Women are the realists pretending to be romantics. Why do these guys rely on so many fragile generalizations?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:50 PM
4

Why is "resisting temptation" categorically a good thing, though? Because RP values are puritan and about controlling women's sexuality. So naturally the fragile RP man values women who are easier to manipulate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:49 PM
5

What is new is women’s ability to globalize their Chad chasing. The bumfuck iowa farm girl was not getting DM’d by Chad in the 50’s. The fantasies/nightmares these guys come up with about the dating market are fucking hilarious. If there's an easy way to spot an RP guy it's gross generalizations completely detached from reality that confirm their insecurities.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 01:55 AM
13

What could a woman offer a man beside her youth and beauty? And these guys wonder why they struggle to find women who want to date them...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 11:01 PM
8

Yeah exactly this. Beauty standards are socially constructed. People have differing opinions. Seems like a lot of RPers believe in one true standard of attraction, and base all their behavior on it. That's why they appear to be so inflexible.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 06:37 PM
2

First you suggested via analogy that women lacked the awareness to help a guy improve himself, literally comparing them to an animal. Then in lieu of saying something intelligent you made references to reproduction and female genitals as if you thought that supported the previous post. Looks like garden-variety misogyny to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 03:02 AM
2

It appears all you were able to offer in response was misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 02:54 AM
2

This red pill fantasy that women can't possibly know what they are attracted to and also have no idea about how men work blows my mind. Seems like projection at best. I'd say asking women is more rational than asking unsuccessful men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 02:34 AM
11

It is literally not. You are just mangling a purported quote by Einstein.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 01:21 AM
2

In comparison, I have no debt, tall, not horrendous (she said I looked good), live by myself, have a great career (well into the 6 figures), lots of investments, and more. When will these guys understand that attraction and interest for a woman are not only based on attributes and demographics. She has no current career, lives with her folks, clearly aging poorly (in the face), and more. But I liked her personality and we had a lot in common. I'd wager based on what you are willing to say here, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 10:21 PM
0

You don't have very good reading comprehension. Run along little boy...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:20 PM
1

feminist teachings It's not the bible dude. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:56 PM
-1

Because it's an anecdote and his read on the situation isn't omniscient... You aren't very good at this are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:43 PM
2

Dumping an S/O within the exact same week as a death in their family is poor moral judgement, especially since in this case she asked him to open up about it. And at least according to his word, her specific reasoning for dumping him was the emotional response he gave in an attempt to “open up”. So it’s not like she was already planning to break up anyway. We don't really know the exact context because he was pretty vague, so I'd reserve judgement if I were you. Even if you are red pill you shou…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:38 PM
0

Dude you suck, she dumped him because because he opened up about a family death even though she said talking about his emotions wouldn't change anything and you're blaming him?! What an asshole. Oh are you reading that girl's mind? You don't know shit, you are just making assumptions. You red pill little boys are so fragile. I'm not an asshole for suggesting his read could be wrong, he's under 18 for ffs. You don't seem to have the intellect to handle even an inkling of nuance or complexity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:36 PM
3

(Keep in mind that was my second relationship lol) Well honestly you should be proud of yourself because early relationships can be rough and it sounds like you are keeping your head above water. Dating is better in college anyway lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 09:48 AM
0

I didn't really feel as if it was grounds for what she did, but hey, it's her choice. My point was to suggest there was certainly more than this driving her decision. She didn't need "grounds." And I wouldn't exactly want her sticking around if she wasn't attracted to me. There you go. I promise, you can be become very socially adept if you learn how to not blame people for pointless stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 09:37 AM
3

Eh, we only have his perspective, so any conclusion based off the anecdote is flawed anyway. That I can agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 09:22 AM
1

a good and honest man For starters they are high-schoolers, and second he mislead her about who he was or he wouldn't refer to her as "a full-on feminist-crazed girl." He said he had misgivings about it and held them back. He later told her the truth and she wasn't interested anymore. They clearly weren't a good match, and it wasn't because she wasn't supporting him. What, were you expecting her to stick with him a while after she found out she doesn't like him or his beliefs? Come on...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 09:15 AM
-2

The guy said they had mismatched values to begin with, he's hurt or mad at her for finding out. It wasn't that she couldn't handle it, she just didn't like who he actually was. Your comments talk about your parents and driver's ed, so I'm going to guess you don't have much life experience. Not everything is a zero sum game. The guy didn't need to shoot himself in the foot. Giving people the benefit of the doubt and time to get to know you is an effective way to build relationships. It's not dish…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:24 AM
-3

Emotional intelligence is a thing, and so is reading a situation. The answer to 'tell me how you feel' is never "sure I'll tell you my deepest darkest thoughts and secrets." If you fall for that trap, then you are the bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:25 AM
1

Seems like this kind of statement only holds up if you really really believe in stereotypes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:38 AM
2

It turns out humans can hold conflicting roles and views at one time!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:37 AM
1

Yeah exactly, all the guys making generalizations about who sleeps with who don't seem to get out much.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:37 AM
-1

seem to think Focus on that part.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:33 AM
-12

We dated for a few months, then I opened up at her insistence about a family death. She dumped me within the week because 'she didn't feel the same way'. Maybe? There's your story about why she broke up with you, and there are her reasons. Assuming they are the same thing is a mistake. Additionally, if you've been holding back your feelings and they interpret it as you lying the whole time, can you blame them for giving you blowback? I've seen this shit a million times, girl wants more, guy give…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:27 AM
202

Calls self "wordsmith" ... can barely type.
/r/seduction16/09/15 03:44 PM
0

That's because this is an empty bs self help article. Even if you are happy, they want you to be unhappy so they can get involved with you monetarily.
/r/seduction29/10/13 03:34 AM
-1

How much more do I have to spell out that your analogy doesn't match the situation or anything that I wrote? A. I was talking about how 'PaulRivers10' was calling out people for 'blue pill behavior' and each instance of this was pretty subtle. Thus this situation you described in your bad analogy never happened. Nobody popped into the sub, posted something wildly out of line, and expected to be embraced. Not only that, but I never expressed or implied that. B. I suggested that this calling out b…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/13 03:20 AM
-1

Bad analogy son.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 11:45 PM
-2

You thought I was a chick. You were being an asshole and trying to get pictures. Now you are weirded out because I turned the tables on you? Priceless. I still hold that you are a few neurons dying away from mental retardation though.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 10:52 PM
0

Trends as observed in 'life' tend to be vary narrow in scope. People who think they are getting the short end of the stick in life tend to be there because they continually choose to be in that position. I've been reading this sub for a few weeks, and I must say there is a substantial amount of blame thrown around. There is some 'pick yourself up' attitudes, but it's the minority in my view. RP ideas are born from noticing trends and sharing those thoughts. Racism has been justified under these …
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 10:26 PM
-1

how things really work versus how they appear to. Unfortunately I'm a cartesian skeptic, but thank you for the thought-out response to my pretty inflammatory reply. The thing with the humanities (where most feminist theory originates) is that it is not about an objective reality. It is about subjective, flowing perspectives. So taking an objective lens to feminism is an exercise in futility which tends to lead to confusion misunderstood as disagreement. I'm not sure I agree that there is a reali…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 10:12 PM
1

I said your argument was uninteresting. How does that translate into the popularity of the thread? You really are unintelligent. Because you are a little slow, by 'uninteresting,' I meant your thoughts lack depth.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 09:44 PM
2

Your comment is a lot of words Go be dismissive elsewhere, you don't own the thread child. Your argument was uninteresting because of your inability to grok basic terminology of the fields which you cite. For example, the feminist critique of gender roles does not mean this: "there are no differences between the sexes." That's because nobody fucking says that.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 09:33 PM
-3

Your understanding of the social reality is stillborn.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 09:07 PM
-4

So you are whining about what you think is whining? So beta.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 08:52 PM
0

Exclusion is not an expected property of groups. Some groups do it, but they tend to be the kind that rely on it for their existence. For example /r/velo is a group for competitive cyclists. Nobody in that sub excludes or actively rallies against those who are not competitive cyclists. This is a negative property in my experience.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 07:48 PM
2

Sorry, I got that.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 07:41 PM
-2

Your statement is exactly the kind of thinking that TRP is against. It's ok to exclude people. Not just ok, but a necessity. I guess that answers my question. And no, not all groups do that. It's highly amusing that you believe your own bullshit though.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 07:38 PM
2

My point was that this doesn't make a dent in feminist theory whatsoever and that should be obvious because this guy doesn't have an inkling of the theories of his opponents.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 07:10 PM
5

Because everything is about evolutionary biology. If you're doing a takedown of Feminism, you're going to have to do better than pointing a stick at biology and yelling "got you!"
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 05:32 PM
0

But maybe weirded in a good way.
/r/seduction28/09/13 05:48 AM
2

Perhaps try dating slightly older women and see if that changes your perspective on them?
/r/seduction24/09/13 10:11 PM
1

I've done it 3 or 4 times. In Seattle the attractiveness of the women has been hit and miss. Take it very lightly and you'll have fun.
/r/seduction24/09/13 09:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter