TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

villevillakulla Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by villevillakulla on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Thank you for your rationality! This subreddit would be far less poisonous if there were more people like you commenting.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 11:19 PM
1

Oh please. Pulling out the "oh because I'm a man I can't complain?!" card makes you as annoying as the women you apparently hate. It would be just as annoying of a post if it was a woman who made up some man-hating bullshit, so please know that the above commenter calling you out has nothing to do with your gender and everything to do with your childish, petulant attitude.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 11:17 PM
-1

Again... how is this a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 06:34 PM
0

Are you implying that Kate Upton had anything to do with the design of this poster?
/r/MensRights24/12/13 07:09 PM
1

There's no point in trying to argue with an extremist.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:31 PM
0

You don't understand what you're talking about. Slut walks have nothing to do with hatred for men; you're reading into things that you don't understand and projecting your own bullshit issues all over the place.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 06:48 PM
1

The 100k wasn't just for the logo, it was also for the entire visual branding system that they set up, how it could be used, what formats, etc. etc. Those are all really important (and standard) things in design.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:12 PM
-1

"bringing over their usual drama and social politics and trying to basically make it exactly like the culture that the geeks fled" Lol, what?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:04 PM
0

Slut Walks are not about hating men. Fucking Christ.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:55 PM
2

People like you give MRAs a bad name. Stay classy.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:52 PM
3

a : unjust or cruel exercise of authority or power b : something that oppresses especially in being an unjust or excessive exercise of power 2 : a sense of being weighed down in body or mind : depression http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/oppression Who the fuck are you to redefine oppression and say that since there's a "reciprocity of rights and obligations for both parties" that it doesn't count? If you want to get technical with that ridiculous argument, you can go ahead and say that …
/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:52 PM
2

Oh please. So you're just going to willfully ignore the first and last parts? Grow up.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 08:27 PM
1

I'm not disagreeing with you at all, just trying to play devil's advocate a little bit.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:28 PM
0

No one's going to ever take you seriously if anybody with an opposing viewpoint is automatically a feminist whose opinion holds no weight.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:27 PM
1

You're not understanding. It'd be like telling a father than he can't complain about getting called a "good dad", the stereotyped definition of that being a strong man who doesn't show emotions, takes his son fishing and hunting and doesn't let him play with toys besides trucks, etc. etc. It's not about complimenting someone's parenting skills. It's about trying to get away from the normative definition of what being a "good" mom is.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:55 AM
1

How? It's really simple. She doesn't want to be pigeon-holed into the stereotypical "good mother", which has far-reaching implications whether you have to deal with them or not. The article is just about her not wanting to be thought of as a stereotypical, "perfect" mother, because being a "good" mother can mean lots of different things - just as it does for good fathers.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:49 AM
1

Try reversing this and imagining that it's written from a father's point of view, about how being a good dad means only doing masculine things and not having or displaying emotions, and making sure your kids can man up like you, and basically anything that a stereotypical "good dad" is, and then see if you feel okay making a crack about "oh it's a wonder he has any actual time to be a dad."
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:47 AM
1

Pretty douchey to equate rape to mere cat-calling.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:34 AM
-1

This is a dumb and childish view. Of course there are extremes, as with anything else, but most feminists I know ARE looking for equality. This would be similar to going back to the 60s and saying "Well, civil rights activists are only looking to deal with issues that empower black people, they're not out for equality." Obviously they're trying to empower themselves, because there's a disparity in power to begin with. Duh? But it's rarely about pushing any agenda, outside of the extremists.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:12 AM
0

I wish this comment was higher in the thread. Not only does this post make literally NO sense, it's implying that feminists should not be able to try to improve things that they have a vested interest in so long as there are similar problems for different groups. I feel like it'd be similar to telling a charity organization who is feeding a village of people in one country "well, what about this OTHER country? and also, fuck you!" It's stupid and childish and just a way to complain.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:08 AM
-2

I guess it depends on how you define oppressed or deprived, but it kind of sounds like you're full of shit, and "different roles" can be a blanket statement to mean anything you want it to mean.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:02 AM
1

Though it may have originated as a term of respect, it's totally contextual and it doesn't mean the same thing or hold the same weight anymore. As a girl growing up when I heard someone say "act like a lady" it meant "don't do all those things that boys are doing." I think the feeling of disempowerment she's alluding to stems from the fact that it creates an unfair sense of inequality - and even if you see it as giving women more respect, most women I know don't enjoy feeling like they deserve m…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:10 AM
0

Yeah because one article by one woman speaks for an entire group of people. Generalizations don't help your cause, buddy.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:03 AM
2

I would argue that it's not fair to say no one would care at all if the comment was made about a man, because the context is not the same. By and large women have been conditioned to think that they should achieve self-worth through their looks, by the media, advertisements, family, etc. etc. This is probably why women will get more defensive over their looks being referenced in a work setting, where they want to be seen for what they do, not how hot they are. Perhaps no one would care if it was…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:02 AM
1

I do understand what you're saying. However, coming from the standpoint of a woman (who does not consider herself any sort of radical feminist) I think I can provide more context. I did read the article, thank you, and I think the whole situation itself is kind of silly, but it does bring to light an issue that exists. I don't think anyone is insulted by being told they're good-looking, but it is obnoxious and unrprofessional when it's mentioned in a work setting. Commenting on the beauty of wom…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 11:56 PM
2

No problem! I'd like to hear your thoughts.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:12 PM
0

That's not what this is about at all. The issue is not that women want to be men, it's that they want to be judged based off of their merits, not what they look like. Imagine going through life being complimented only on what you look like, vs. all of the things you do, goals you've accomplished, etc. I'm not saying that this is what it's like for all women, and I'm not saying it's the same for every situation - but that's what the issue is here, and it's not that women are just looking for reas…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 05:18 AM
2

Sexism is definitely not just being told what you can and can't do. It's being treated differently, often unfairly, based on your gender. It's not appalling for a woman to not want to be judged based on her looks, and rather on her merits - it's not a matter of being offended at being known as a woman, but being treated as if the only thing worth striving for is being beautiful.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 05:15 AM
1

One young woman, not "these young women".
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:52 PM
0

You shouldn't be getting a "rape report" from reading between the lines. OP was grossly exaggerating in order to get people to look at his dumb link.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:51 PM
0

This should be at the top.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:51 AM
0

Lol, okay tough guy.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:40 AM
0

Excuse me?
/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:17 AM
1

I'll bet.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:46 PM
1

Oh you're so clever. So the whole point of your sarcastic comment was NOT to equate dressing up in slutty clothes and then complaining about being raped with showing off your money and watches and fur coats then complaining about being robbed?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:26 PM
1

That's not what Slutwalks are about at all. They're doing the exact opposite of what you just said, actually. Assuming you're a man, think of it like this way: if you got raped and then your friends or family or the court system said you were asking for it because you were wearing really short shorts, you would probably say that was ridiculous, right? You wouldn't say "Well maybe I should wear longer shorts in the future..." That's what this is about. People don't rape people because of what the…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:20 PM
2

This is fucking awful of you to say. Most people who get raped aren't scantily clad or "showing off the goods". People don't look at someone and decide they're going to rape them because of what they're wearing. You're disgusting.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:13 PM
8

I don't think it's that they don't want people commenting, just that you need to take the context of the scene, movie, etc. into consideration. I also don't think it has anything to do with them wanting their lives to be private. These are very talented, famous women, and he easily reduced them down to only being notable because of their tits. At least, that's what I got from the article. I didn't hear the song though or watch the Oscars, and apparently their reactions were pre-recorded, so who …
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:08 AM
0

This should be closer to the top.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:00 AM
1

Oh fuck me, I thought that you were replying to a comment I made to JabCross, which was part of my response to Ksight. That's the guy I think is actually just a troll, and responding to him has gotten me a little angry because sometimes it's like arguing with a wall who calls you a cunt afterward. I've let that annoyance sway some of my comments, which I shouldn't do. I'm definitely not saying that it's worse to be a widow or to be the partner of someone who was raped, not by any means. I do thi…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:21 AM
1

Sorry, I wasn't trying to be inconsiderate. If you go through the person's comment history who I replied to you'll see that most of his comments are vitriolic and incredibly disgusting, and I let that get the best of me. Yes, I agree that is primarily an issue that affects men. However, your comparison isn't exactly the same thing. A man being taken away from a family has potential to have more concrete effects, such as a loss of income, a loss of support, and more stress on the parent staying b…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 11:20 PM
1

Don't listen to people like JabCross. He's largely full of shit. He may very well be an intelligent person, but he's so angry that he has absolutely no idea how to effectively communicate his ideas, so he deteriorates into childlike name-calling. He's exactly like the radical feminists that he spews hatred for. That being said, there are a lot of intelligent people in this sub, male and female alike, you just need to have time to wade through the trolls and do your own research.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:32 AM
3

First of all, I never identified as a feminist. I said that it's unfair to use examples of radical feminism and say that every feminist acts that way. It would be similar to saying "Since there are some Muslim extremists who practice terrorism, that must mean all of them are crazy." Being able to understand a situation does not mean you're a supporter or sympathizer, it means that you have a rational mind capable of intelligent thought. You're obviously very angry, and that's fine. But you're in…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:59 PM
1

You're quite clearly being ridiculous here. Primary victims, yes. Only victims? No. It's incredibly short-sighted to say that only men are affected by their deaths. A woman and a man are happily married, they have children together, he gets drafted and dies, and he's the only one affected? Bullshit. And no one said that women were the only ones who are victims - obviously this encompasses children as well. You sound literally EXACTLY the same as radical feminists, but with the genders reversed. …
/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:57 PM
-1

And it's exactly people like you who will do nothing to help further your cause, because all you do is spout hateful rhetoric instead of anything insightful or helpful. You give Men's Rights a bad name.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 02:21 PM
1

It's completely asinine to insinuate that selective service is only an issue that affects men. Yes, lives are lost. No, that doesn't only affect the men. These men are presumably oftentimes part of families. Are you completely obtuse?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:30 AM
1

No, no, no! How can you possible use such a sweeping generalization as truth? This does nothing to help further the cause of men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:29 AM
1

Thank you! It's completely unfair to take certain examples of radical feminism and say that every feminist believes or acts that way.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:28 AM
1

Another thought: the reason that it's important for women to affirm that no matter what they wear, no means no, etc. is not because scandalous clothes cause rape. It's because the IDEA that scandalous clothes cause rape is so prevalent that it even makes it into the court system, which is awful. "Oh, well, she was wearing a really short skirt. She must be a slut who was asking for it." It's a method of combating that completely asinine and bullshit lie.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 08:42 PM
1

I'm not taking what you said out of context at all. Men are not going to rape a woman because she's scantily dressed. If you researched more into the subject you'd find that rape is NOT caused by what women (or men) wear, but rather a person thinking they can take control over another person's body because they are an easy target. This rarely has anything to do with clothing. I understand, though I still think it's very ignorant, your point of maybe being able to "avoid a situation of rape." But…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 08:40 PM
1

If you don't see the problems that he does, then you are completely blind. Almost every single post is dominated in the comments section by blind hatred for women and for feminists, the two of which also aren't mutually exclusive by any means. It breeds contempt and it sends the wrong message, and would be exactly like going to a "WomensRights" board and finding that the majority of the comments were something like "this is just like men, they're so evil, blah blah blah." It does a huge disservi…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:38 AM
1

It has nothing to do with handicapping men or trying to give women an unfair advantage, and is certainly not because males have a superior intellect. Like a commenter mentioned above, they were trying to capture a new audience and probably just drum up some fun publicity.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:28 AM
1

You're absolutely disgusting, and it's people like you who give a bad name to this subreddit. Do you know anything about rape at all, or do you just like getting angry? This entire comment is full of victim blaming. You don't like it if women dress provocatively, and though you say it doesn't make rape okay, it puts sex on the mind - which is, effectively, taking the blame away from a rapist. Your opinions regarding how women dress are your own opinions, and you can prefer whatever you like in r…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:07 AM
2

Are you fucking kidding me? "It's obvious that she hasn't been the center of romantic attraction"? How would you ever know that? HOW? You are making a sweeping generalization based on YOUR preference regarding attractiveness. Attractiveness doesn't always correlate into rape, either, and it's fucking stupid to imply that it does. It's also really short-sighted and incredibly obtuse to insinuate that she can't align herself with a cause if she hasn't been a victim of it. Would you impose the same…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:02 AM
2

I've noticed a trend on this subreddit where "feminism" basically means "anything or anyone that doesn't jive with what we believe." The term they want is "misandrist" but that makes it a lot harder to focus hatred on a particular group. There's a lot of hypocrisy in this place.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:57 AM
2

Broad generalizations don't help anybody's case, and they just make you seem like kind of a dick. That works both ways, for both genders.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter