TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vincentclarke Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by vincentclarke on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You don't have a case. That's why we're done, actually.
/r/ExRedPill02/07/26 06:29 PM
1

You are narrowing the concept of leadership to suit your agenda. I clearly framed my discourse around dominance (or hegemony) and the spontaneous seeking of the role. I did not in fact say that women are inherently worse leaders or even talk about the many qualities a "good" (there's a difference between being good and being effective) leader should have. There is simply one characteristic that any leader should have and is the WILL to be a leader, and as we observe there are far more dominant i…
/r/ExRedPill02/07/26 01:41 AM
1

I'm glad listening to his content helped you but I'm 100% sure you misunderstood his idea - at least from reading the last bit. What I agree with and it's extremely good to known: there's no natural synergy and relationships require lots of effort to work long term. What I disagree with: (healthy) relationships are actually a source of fulfillment and wellbeing. It's well known that men in relationships live longer and are healthier than singles and that married women are on average the happiest…
/r/ExRedPill29/06/26 10:24 PM
1

Where do you get that it's a zero sum game? You know what's a zero sum game? The one feminists are playing by hating men. Contrary, Dr Taraban seems to encourage men to seek women and that a relationship is a win win situation so long as it is mutual and balanced. What you're trying to say is that according to him relationships are transactional and sure enough even in very loving relationships love isn't unconditional. Love is contingent on people acting a certain way and putting in a certain e…
/r/ExRedPill29/06/26 10:10 PM
1

No he doesn't. I think he openly says other relationship elements are equally important and he talks about them.
/r/ExRedPill29/06/26 10:05 PM
1

Sounds like lots of women just hate men nowadays and hate the idea sexes need eachother. Just because a truth is inconvenient if politically incorrect it doesn't mean it's a falsehood. Why would it be bad to say that sexes need eachother? Would it be sexist or some -ist to say that gay men need other men? Or that hero men need male friends? Same applies for women? It's very much not controversial that people need different elements in their lives that come from other people based on roles and id…
/r/ExRedPill29/06/26 10:04 PM
1

And how would that be wrong? Unless he's saying that no woman can ever be a leader or no man can ever be soft and nurturing, he's factually correct. The disparity in rate not only of people who are leaders, but who also seek to be leaders and express this wish, support the point that men are more likely to have some leadership trait. Mechanically this is explained by testosterone which predicts dominance-seeking. Men with higher testosterone will either take power through violence or seek to be …
/r/ExRedPill29/06/26 09:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter