TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vipt84 Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by vipt84 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Okay, I'm glad it was sarcasm, but you have to admit it's a little obscure as a reference.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:33 PM
5

You've been spouting racist bullshit in every thread you've posted in. Go away.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:31 PM
2

What evidence do you have that these students are "militants"?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:28 PM
1

Women are FIVE TIMES MORE LIKELY THAN MEN to die from murder in the workplace. That's not even true in itself. Men are about twice as likely as women to be murdered at the work place overall. A higher percentage of women killed at the workplace die from murder than the percentage of the same with men, for whom the proportion that die from workplace hazards is significantly greater.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 11:13 PM
3

"Anything less than four years and she has got off lightly," he said. Yeah, good luck with that. I'll be surprised if her jail time isn't suspended entirely.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 11:01 PM
7

New Jersey is one of the states in most dire need of alimony reform. Their alimony laws are absolutely ludicrous.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:50 PM
3

She was 17 when she made the accusation that their sexual relationship started when she was only 13.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 08:33 AM
2

Print out a paper that says "31% of female college students also admit to sexual harassment", with a citation to page 18 of the same source their figure comes from, and tape it underneath. You could also include information about the things they list as types of sexual harassment, since they've obviously used a very broad definition.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:04 PM
1

Here's a more statistically rigorous accounting of the fatalities by gender and class, as opposed to a slew of disorganized and ill-suited tables accompanied by cherry-picked factoids whose sole purpose seems to be to distract from the massive gender difference in survival rates.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 05:56 AM
5

What's worse is that they've been informed of the error numerous times and still haven't corrected it. In comparison, Amnesty International, to their credit, when informed of the error did change the figure to represent the actual findings of the report and cited it as the source of the claim.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:20 AM
7

The data include everyone living below the poverty line, which is a measure of income in proportion to expected necessary household expenses (according to number of dependents), not just the homeless and absolutely destitute who live on the fringes of society. There are lots of single mothers in particular who live below the poverty line, which skews the number towards women far more than the much smaller number of homeless would skew it towards men (assuming the homeless are even measured by it…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:08 AM
20

The UN also parrots this false statistic about the effects of domestic violence on women: "Among women aged between 15 and 44, acts of violence cause more death and disability than cancer, malaria, traffic accidents and war combined." This, as well as the slightly more believable variant of the statistic that concerns only morbidity, has been convincingly disproved in a BBC radio program that you can listen to here. This webpage tracks the original source of the claim to a 1994 World Bank report…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:31 AM
1

We're talking subtle human biases here, not (in most cases) overt, conscious discrimination. Do you dispute the racial sentencing gap as well?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 11:29 PM
19

When you look at the stats of women who initiate divorce, abuse and cheating are pretty far down on the list of reasons for divorce. Nowhere near a third.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 09:11 PM
2

There isn't a single woman alive in the United States who has not had the franchise for her entire adult life.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 11:37 PM
2

The great majority were men, but not all of them. Black women were sometimes lynched for trying to protect their men, or because they were accused of abetting them somehow. I don't think many white women were lynched, though. Particularly notorious white criminals were sometimes lynched as well, but a number of whites were lynched for trying to stop the mobs from administering vigilante justice, including sometimes even officers at jails where the accused victim was being held.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 10:50 AM
6

Does that not back up exactly what fuckingdanzig said?
/r/MensRights25/12/13 01:23 AM
1

That's a rather opaque metaphor.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 07:52 AM
2

She'll be paroled in 5 years if she has good behavior.
/r/PussyPass19/12/13 12:10 AM
1

The problem with your argument is that it completely fails to understand the economics of developed vs developing nations. The developing nations, which have but a piddling amount of the world's GDP, are the only countries where such stark differences between men and women's wealth exist. US women alone own 5.4% of the world's income. Considering that the EU has a larger GDP than the US and equivalent levels of economic equality between the sexes, (and that doesn't even include other large econo…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:58 AM
1

If the accusations happened independently I would agree, but from the way he tells it, it seems like it's the same person or group of people doing it every time. Sometimes people get ideas into their heads and confirmation bias takes over. Sounds like someone at the school is convinced there's something untoward about him, and he or she may have convinced others of the same.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:31 AM
1

The ice cream story struck me as the least weird of all of it. I could imagine lots of kids doing something like that. What about it sounds off to you?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:23 AM
3

It made it to Reddit's front page. That's why.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 09:14 PM
2

Your post is so off-point it's ridiculous. The only time you're upset by "dick" is when you're using it in a fallacious argument about your right to call women names. No one called any woman any names. You see, in much (most?) of the English-speaking world the word 'cunt' is used indiscriminately for both men and women, which is exactly how ifistbadgers used it here. Not everything is about women. Just because men are immune to being called "dicks" doesn't mean women want to be called "cunts" or…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:13 PM
3

Sounds like someone's been bullshitting you.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 08:40 PM
7

It didn't contain all men before. Did you even look at it?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 09:51 AM
2

So you're saying they have a different definition of "consensual" that is essentially meaningless?
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:35 PM
3

It was Texas that locked him up, not Canada. One stupid Canadian woman as compared with the entire Texas justice system.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 02:55 PM
3

The word 'incapacited' suggests no sort of conscious decision whatsoever.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 11:21 PM
9

Because the justice system is shit. They'd rather put away some innocent schmuck than seem ineffective by not convicting someone for the crime. This has been known to happen in high-profile murder cases as well.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 05:26 AM
1

You are an extremist, as can be easily gleaned from your multiple misrepresentations and lies in this very thread. Sorry, dude, but it's abundantly clear to objective observers that you're hopelessly biased against NPO and Robert Franklin. I don't know why this is (he banned you from his comments section or some other triviality, I presume), but it's hardly helpful to the MRM.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 10:23 PM
2

Robert Franklin believes the core value of men is to be wallets or ATM machines. That does not mesh with promoting shared parenting. It makes no sense at all, actually. In case you're wondering why Fathers and Families has always been ineffectual, herein lies the problem. Not according to the opinions he puts forth in his own blog and the kind of legislation his organization promotes. Seriously, does this sound like someone who only wants fathers to be "wallets or ATM machines"? What is the purp…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 09:46 PM
1

Having now looked at the organization's blog, the opinions expressed in them don't seem to match your representation of him or his organization at all. But others shouldn't have to take my word for it: here's their blog. Furthermore, your quotation is taken out of context and seems to have been designed to misrepresent his opinion. That quote is from a short analysis of Breaking bad. Here's some context: Less important, but, in the context of present-day pop culture, still significant is the fac…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 09:29 PM
5

I don't understand your complaint. More physical custody for the father means more time directly raising the kids and hence less money paid to the mother for child support, as it's the non-custodial parent who always pays child support. With joint physical custody the child support arrangement is determined based on how much time the child spends with each parent. If it's completely equal time, there would be no child support payments from one party to the other at all. Also, the problem with th…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 05:20 AM
5

Not to mention remarry.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 03:56 AM
0

huh?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:01 PM
1

Misleading titles like this should warrant a ban, IMO.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:31 PM
2

Inner city gang violence accounts for a lot of it, I imagine.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 10:01 PM
5

Except the twelve month figures are pretty consistently gender-symmetrical across the board, with a large gap between genders only appearing in the lifetime statistics: Unwanted sexual contact in the last 12 months for men: 2,565,000 Unwanted sexual contact in the last 12 months for women: 2,600,000 What do you think explains this huge discrepancy between lifetime reports and reports from the last twelve months for men? Why do you assume that the lifetime reports are more accurate?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:34 PM
1

Much of the societal narrative about women would have us believe that women are incapable of such brutality, especially towards their own progeny.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:42 PM
6

Where did you get that silly idea?
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:03 PM
1

A bit ironic coming from someone who doesn't know when and when not to use "whom".
/r/MensRights04/10/13 02:20 AM
4

People who do interrogations for a living generally don't know what the fuck they're doing. They're the reason why we have so many innocents rotting in prison over false accusations.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:59 PM
6

Please cite the studied. I mean the actual studies. You'll find that the actual studies are disingenuously cited and don't support the oft-cited "fact" that women attempt suicide more often than men. The only reason you think you "know" this is because of the woozle effect.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:49 PM
1

Some people love their kids, believe it or not. And it's called "winning" because they sought custody themselves.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:44 PM
10

Infants and small children shouldn't even be allowed at plays, to be honest. They're a major distraction.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:21 PM
-3

Looking through your posting history, you seem to be a pretty nasty homophobe and a racist. Go away.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:14 PM
1

Here's the thing: the gender feminist view of rape is so pervasive that heterosexual rape of males just isn't studied. The CDC study was one of the first of its kind to actually consider asking men about sexual abuse within heterosexual relationships. I don't know why you'd expect random sampling to exaggerate one side but not the other. Though there are flaws, particularly in not explaining the discrepancy between the difference in lifetime vs 12 month figures for men and women, their sampling …
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:05 PM
5

Let me guess, the Gender Bias Study of the Court System in Massachusetts from 1989? Not only is it outdated, it's patently false.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:11 PM
4

Read the reddit wiki. Upvotes and downvotes on OPs are 'fuzzed'. It's possible that none of the downvotes are real, and certain that at least some of them aren't.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:00 AM
10

Yes, let's pretend that r/twoxchromosomes doesn't have a far larger user-base.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:00 AM
15

If she has moral qualms about abortion, and doesn't want to be responsible for the financial support of her own choice, there's always adoption.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:44 PM
1

But this is benevolent sexism, which actually hurts women more than men. Men don't have feelings.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:39 AM
2

A modern-day Medea.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:19 AM
19

It's pretty clear that she is a false accuser, though the girl herself isn't really at fault, seeing as she was a minor at the time when her mother convinced her that she had been sexually abused. She's obviously very confused. False-memory syndrome induced by a psychotic mother is hardly an unknown phenomenon. Keep in mind that most the girl's testimony was based on a "flashback" that only occurred after the CPS told her (and her mother) that they didn't have any evidence with which to accuse L…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:04 PM
6

You forgot to mention that the quirt gun has kerosene in it.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:59 AM
2

Is this sarcasm?
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:21 AM
-2

You're quite dumb, aren't you?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:36 AM
1

How about taking some responsibility for your actions like most ppl on MR advocate for women. We'd be against abortion if that were the case. A woman who makes a unilateral choice to have child and keep it should of course take sole responsibility for her choice.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:50 AM
3

No clue what you mean by "maybe she made him a deal", but false confessions are one of the leading causes of miscarriages of justice.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:39 PM
-1

How often does the Telegraph lament the impact of a prison sentence on the families of males who murder? Sorry, but you're way off base here. This wasn't even murder, and by conflating it with murder you're just diluting the discussion about areas where women do receive disproportionate sympathy for no good reason. Far more interesting, for example, is the automatic sympathy wives who murder their husbands receive, regardless of actual circumstances, because certain gender-feminists have monopol…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:11 PM
2

You both suck.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 07:42 PM
11

Take a statistics course.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:30 PM
2

What a shitty article.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:46 PM
1

That's just another bullshit statistic. Never take statistics that lack citations to proper studies at face value, especially when they come from a feminist or other ideologically-driven source.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:19 PM
2

So what's the issue, exactly? Other than that twitter is utter shit for making informed arguments.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:16 AM
2

Changing it to "will receive any abuse (including verbal) from any intimate partner in their lifetime" would make it comport with the 1 in 4 statistic. It has nothing to do with husbands specifically.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 04:52 AM
3

The info would still be wrong in that case, seeing as numerous studies have found that there's greater incidence of domestic violence amongst lesbian couples than amongst heterosexual couples.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 04:40 AM
3

If that's really the case, they clearly aren't right for each other. They should separate. I would have recommended domestic abuse counselling to try to salvage the relationship, but that could actually do more harm than good if it's based on the Duluth model, which doesn't even recognize reciprocal violence and will probably end up just encouraging and reinforcing her own violent behavior. The '1 in 4 women will be beaten by their husbands' statistic is bullshit, by the way.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 04:31 AM
4

Do you advocate for men's rights? Do you have proof that the vandalization in question was perpetrated by an MRA? If the answer to one or both of these questions is 'no', why are you posting it here?
/r/MensRights05/09/13 04:22 AM
4

There aren't really any therapeutic methods that have been shown to work, though. I'm sure if there were a pill or effective treatment program available that could suddenly make a sufferer of gender dysphoria completely comfortable with their birth sex, most trans folk would do that (or have done that) instead. I don't think sex reassignment surgery is something many of them take lightly.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 04:01 AM
4

Thanks for sharing, concern troll.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:48 AM
4

“There’s no such thing as consensual sex when you are supervising someone, regardless of their age, but the reality of it is that some of the girls in prison are very persuasive and some of the men are very persuasive,” Wilkinson said. Can you imagine the feminist ire if this is what had been said about male corrections officers and female juvenile inmates? “I think in many cases female staff are better suited than males,” Wilkinson said. “A good mix of staff is what we always want. That so-call…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:44 AM
38

Was your 'little man' up at any point? Because if so, you're lying. And probably raped her.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:00 PM
4

Her serial crimes show that she has serious psychological issues. Her kids should be taken away from her, to be honest, not as a punitive measure but for their own well-being. Who knows, she might even use them as the objects of her next false accusation against an innocent man, which would do them almost as much harm as the accused.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:42 PM
2

Except that the difference largely disappears between unmarried childless men and women, whereas those women who are married and have children share assets with their higher income-earning spouses.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 06:15 PM
51

I hardly think it was unilaterally "set by men". It's enforced by society, which is made up of both men and women.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:02 PM
1

They weren't fully naked in the original video.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 12:26 AM
-1

You're seriously overestimating them.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 08:14 AM
3

Sure, but that doesn't serve as a mitigating factor in terms of the guilt of the perpetrator. A rapist is as much a rapist regardless of the ease with which they committed the crime.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 10:17 PM
2

There's also the real possibility that male soldiers underreport their sexual abuse, as is true for men in society as a whole. I can hardly see why it would be different in the military.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 12:46 PM
2

The Roe v Wade decision was not in any way predicated upon the credibility of McCorvey (aka 'Roe') as a testifier. It was a constitutional issue, nothing more.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 12:35 PM
12

There's a culture of ignoring and minimizing the victimization of men. I have no idea what kind of point you think you're making.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:09 PM
2

Troll account. Ignore.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 02:48 AM
0

would be signing contracts, and the law is sympathetic to people that signed contracts while under the influence, particularly when the party getting them to sign knew they were under the influence. Sex has never been considered anything similar to a contract. The point of those contract laws is to invalidate the binding consequences of a contract that was signed by someone under the influence, not to prevent people from signing contracts while drunk as if such an act were inherently harmful. Th…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 11:55 PM
0

First and foremost the age of sexual consent in Ireland is 17, this also stands for the distribution of pornography. The girl is 17, so by definition of Irish law this is NOT child porn. You sure about that?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:52 PM
2

I don't know why either. I gave you an upvote. You're absolutely right that PUAs are looking to seduce a particular subset of women.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:30 AM
1

You're profoundly ignorant if you believe this is unique to American jurisprudence. Courts throughout the Western world have taken the exact same position. See Paternity Fraud on Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:22 AM
1

I'm sure they appreciate anyone who brings attention to the issue rather than ignoring it or papering over it with a far less legitimate complaint. Did you know the gender wage gap almost entirely disappears when you compare single and childless men and women aged 35-43? Wonder why that might be.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:19 AM
2

Remove the dagger and that's often how it goes, yes. It's about whether or not she's attracted to him, which has absolutely nothing to do with niceness, real of feigned. It may be uncomfortable to have a unattractive friend want something more from you than friendship, but it doesn't make him a perverted misogynist. It just doesn't. And he's entirely within his rights to not want to continue the friendship if any unrequited feelings makes the friendship too difficult to bear. Same would be true …
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:53 AM
2

Feminists don't shun the opposite sex, that's a trend utterly of your own invention. There is no WGTOW movement, and no interest in one... Lots of feminists have and do shun the opposite sex. Look up Political Lesbianism sometime. That's just the most extreme example. MGTOW is more about not marrying or having children with women because the current legal climate is heavily stacked against men in such a situation. A forced/restrictive culture of domesticity still evident today in common/accepted…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:02 PM
2

Let's dial it the fuck back a bit. It's a fictional comic scenario, and the woman being discussed doesn't even make an appearance to address any of the issues raised about her opinions on the matter. She appears in an earlier strip. She's clearly disturbed. Also, the character making fun of the "Nice Guy" isn't even a feminist, he's just a random bro who apparently has a reputation of being sort of a misogynist. Again, the girl doesn't even show up, and she certainly doesn't say any of the ridic…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 10:44 PM
2

You are really fucking confused. We're talking about NiceGuysTM here, nothing else. See, this guy actually cares about whether his potential sex partner is enthusiastically consenting or not. She specifically says in a previous strip "Shut up before I change my mind", while, I might add, she practically sexually assaults him. In addition to being psychotic, that's not exactly enthusiastic consent. And yet he still gets shamed by the presumably feminist commenters for not wanting to have sex with…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 10:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter