TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

virtua Archive

View 1 post and 32 comments by virtua on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Questionvirtua/r/MensRights06/05/14 03:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well, yes. Brock testified that - not the victim or anyone else. You cut off right before the news article said: This was in sharp contrast to the testimony of numerous witnesses who described her as unresponsive and unconscious from the point she was first discovered around 1 a.m., throughout a 30-minute ambulance ride to Santa Clara Valley Medical Center in San Jose and for several hours at the hospital until she regained consciousness at 4:15 a.m.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:09 PM
1

lifted up her shirt, lifted up her skirt, pulled down her panties and penetrated her with his fingers With her consent according to him, a statement that was not disproven by anyone, including the "victim". I'm not sure where you're getting the fact that she consented to any of that. The only thing I can think of is that you misinterpreted what the victim said in her speech when she was recounting Brock's version of the story here (link to cache here): So one year later, as predicted, a new dial…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:00 AM
1

I found this to be a pretty helpful and comprehensive list of the fundraising websites that are out there right now.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 08:20 PM
1

Though I suppose it depends upon where you live, yes it is. If someone calls the anonymous tip line and provides at the very least an address or even a last name of the abuser and a (legitimate) reason for why they believe someone is in an abusive/dangerous situation, the police can enter into someone's house. Another case is if someone you may or may not know calls emergency (such as 911 or the suicide hotline) and gives them your address or phone number. The police in your area can then track …
/r/MensRights09/05/15 05:06 AM
0

Do you know what the law where you live says about what's considered sexual assault or rape? Regardless of whether it's considered rape or not by the law or other people, how do you feel about what happened to you and do you plan on doing anything about it?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:41 PM
1

Do you mean Locusta?
/r/MensRights27/10/14 05:37 AM
0

All I said was there are more than two biological sexes in humans and in other animals. This can occur where a person is born with sex chromosomes that are not XX or XY but instead XXY, XO, XYY, XYYY, XXX, among others; or when someone has gonads that are different, such as having a vagina and one ovary or testes or having a penis and one testicle. It can also occur when someone has ambiguous genitalia which cannot be discretely categorized as male or female. One example would be if someone had …
/r/MensRights20/10/14 04:14 PM
-2

Except, there are more than two sexes biologically speaking.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 02:43 AM
1

So if I know a 14-year-old boy who does know what he wants and other people who once were 14-year-old boys who knew what they wanted when they were 14, does that make your statement false? Because I do know people who fit both categories. Anyway, I never claimed anything about 14-year-old boys knowing what they want in my first post, only that the OP's friend might believe that there are 14-year-olds who "have the ability to understand what sex is, the implications of engaging in it, and give co…
/r/MensRights06/09/14 06:05 PM
13

This doesn't necessarily have to be a case of having double standards. She might think that the age of consent law is too high and that 14-year-olds in general have the ability to understand what sex is, the implications of engaging in it, and give consent to it. Then again, I'm not sure how likely that would be based on the fact she said, "You mean to tell me that a 14 yr old boy didn't want to have sex? That's bs"
/r/MensRights05/09/14 11:04 PM
0

Well, every group and individual has an idea of what they think reality is because everyone perceives it in their own way. But to claim that what one thinks is reality as actual, objective reality is misinformed because it assumes that one has no biases, that one is essentially omniscient, and that one's own views are grounded in actual reality while everyone else is deluded, despite not knowing what everyone else thinks. Thus, the Red Pill is concerned with what they think is reality - how they…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 06:29 PM
0

TRP is concerned with reality TRP is concerned with what they think is reality.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 03:59 PM
2

That's interesting you brought up the day-care sex-abuse panic since Kern County (where the most prominent one took place) is one of the most conservative places in California. The prosecutor in that case, Ed Jagels, was very popular in Kern County during that time and as far as I'm aware, he still is by the way some people talk about him. Him being very conservative and having the "tough on crime" stance certainly helped enable him to carry out these prosecutions without very much reliable evid…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:03 PM
3

It could be a real thing and it might be helpful to people who do have two Y chromosomes.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:05 AM
5

That's not exactly true in regards to pedophilia. Based on my experience with them, female pedophiles (and I mean females who are sexually attracted to children and not adult females who have sex with a minor) aren't seen as heroes with a struggle and they are still very much at risk of being reported if they should come forward about their attractions. When it comes to people who are known to be pedophiles, gender becomes irrelevant. In cases of general suspicion of a person being a pedophile, …
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:52 AM
2

Here's a link to a webcache of the Huffington Post article, since I couldn't access the actual article link.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:34 PM
5

The liberties that adult women (and teen babysitters) take with male toddlers would be considered sex crimes if the sexes were reversed. That is why pedophilia is seen as rare in females. Pedophilia is not the same as child molestation; the former is an attraction (usually sexual and romantic) to prepubescent children while the latter is the illegal act of engaging in sexual activity with a child. There are a couple of reasons as to why pedophilia is seen as rare in females: From the clinical an…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 07:28 PM
2

There are also chromosomal combinations of XO, XXX, XXY, XXYY, XXXY, XXXXY, and XYY. Typically, these people are considered intersex because their chromosomes and/or their biology don't align with either the male or female sex. Intersex people can also identify with a gender that doesn't match their biological sex as well (for example, if an intersex person felt more comfortable with masculinity and identified as a man.)
/r/MensRights17/07/14 11:22 PM
1

It seems, from what you're describing, that for a trans person even those things that others take for granted are, essentially, breakdowns in the system and you have little to no recourse. Yes, I'd say that's fairly accurate to what I've seen. Admittedly, I am not the most well-informed on domestic violence within those communities but from what I know, gender-segregated domestic violence shelters don't usually accept those who are transgender (both binary and non-binary) and/or intersex because…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:13 PM
1

I think the overlap is essentially the freedom to express one's gender (and the freedom not to) in whatever ways they wish instead of having to adhere to specific gender roles in social, legal, personal, and public settings. One thing in which I think there is overlap between the two groups is the lack of visibility for the issues they face. With people who are non-binary, whether in terms of gender or sex, there is very little legal or social recognition. The obvious examples are government for…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:04 AM
1

You make many good points as to why those who are non-binary aren't brought up that much. I've definitely seen binary transgender people (Male-to-female and Female-to-Male) welcomed in the community even though the specific issues that transgender people face aren't very much discussed as their own topic within the Men's Rights Movement (probably because of the reasons you gave). Speaking as someone who is non-binary myself, I would say that there is an overlap in the social and legal issues tha…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 05:46 AM
2

I still think there is zero evidence that Oberst is asexual. I agree with you in that. I personally don't ever think to assume anything about one's sexuality unless they they come out and say what their sexuality is or what the definition of their sexuality is (e.g. "I'm attracted to men and I want to have sex with them" if one was male and gay.)
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:41 AM
1

or some other better inclusive term that incorporates female and non-binary MRAs I find it interesting that you brought up non-binary MRAs because I have never seen any mention of non-binary genders in any type of Men's Rights discussion aside from a few very brief mentions by one or two commenters such as yourself. Thus, I would be curious to see if there are any people who are of non-binary gender and/or sex who self-identify as MRAs since there is almost no acknowledgement of their existence,…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:30 AM
2

Also as a sidenote which doesn't have to do with the rape charges: dating, getting married, and having sex don't really determine what one's sexuality is. For one, the act of dating and getting married have more to do with desire to adhere to traditional roles about romance than it does with whether or not one desires to have sex with others. Especially for those who are asexual, romance (if they desire it; not all do) is experienced separate from sex and sexuality. Then, there are people who da…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:06 AM
6

You do not need to be American to sign a whitehouse.gov petition. You just need to make an account to sign it.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 06:08 PM
8

There are transgender people who are men and thus, they face similar issues that men who were born biologically male face in society. There are also transgender people who are not necessarily men (they may be women or they may not fit the gender binary) who support the Men's Rights Movement. Regardless, sex and gender roles affect everyone and since the Men's Rights Movement is one that's heavily focused on gender issues, there is a natural intersection between them and those who are transgender…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 02:50 AM
1

Doesn't that mean, then, that people who believe that a movement called Men's Rights is actually about egalitarianism instead of being about favoring men and men's rights are delusional?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:42 PM
1

"When men molest little girls society wants them to be tortured and executed in the most gruesome way. When women molest little boys society laughs and says 'lucky boy'." That is an example of child molestation - an action that is considered to be a crime in many places even though (as you said) male victims and female abusers aren't taken seriously by the general public. Pedophilia, on the other hand, is an attraction to prepubescent children; there's no action of abuse involved.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:45 AM
2

I don't know what AMR is, but I just wanted to say that this isn't a bait question. Someone asked me the question I posed in my original post and so I thought I should get other people's opinions (from people who wouldn't be as likely to be offended by the question) besides my own.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 10:12 PM
1

I'm not sure I understand your response. First of all, I am not the person who asked the question, as I stated in my post. Secondly, the person who asked the question would agree with you. That was the point they were making - someone should be able to get drunk at parties and black out at parties without anything happening to them but we don't live in a world without rapists.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 09:53 PM
2

Thanks for the suggestion. I wasn't aware of that subreddit before. I'm actually only looking for a discussion on this topic (so guesses and theories) and I posted here because I wanted to gain more varied responses on this topic.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:48 PM
3

Yes. Rape, by definition, is performing a non-consensual sexual act in which the term "sexual act" varies depending on the location you live in. One who is drunk to the point of being blacked out is recognized as legally unable to give any form of consent to sexual activity. (I would also think that one who is blacked out would be unable to give consent to any type of activity whatsoever as well.) Thus, having sex with someone who is blacked out as a result of being drunk is rape.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter