TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

virtual_rice Archive

View 0 posts and 152 comments by virtual_rice on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Disagree. Women often want someone who provides at the level they do or more. If I’m looking for someone who has accomplished at least what I have and that puts him in position of provider, then I’m by definition a provider as well. I don’t look at my own salary accomplishment as a metric that reduces my existence down to just that, nor do I view men that way. Now, if I had no money and planned on being a housewife or something, this argument would make more sense. Reducing someone to a specific…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 10:56 PM
–

You are reducing men to the role of provider. If one of your primary filters is income then you are delegating him to the responsibility of primary provider and protector. You can go on and on about how there are other elements at play when it comes to attraction and play the "not all women card", but as you clearly demonstrated, traditional male gender norms are the defining characteristic most women look for. Providing your children with the best life possible by putting that on the man is you…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 10:28 PM
–

Classic feminist absolving herself of any personal responsibility. Reducing men to the role of provider, a traditional male gender norm, all the while lamenting the role she should be expected to play in domestic work and child raising.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 10:21 PM
–

To the feminists saying that the solution to the misandry that OP is seeing is to simply get off the internet and talk to real women, how do you then feel about the supposed internet misogyny that you lament about? Is it also just pushed by an algorithm and isn't representative of men's actual views nor does it have an effect on real life interactions? Or is it the usual, "it's only sexist when men do it" rhetoric?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 10:17 PM
3

It doesn't matter how often I'm actually called to protect the home. Women are high in neuroticism and feminist rhetoric about the dangers women supposedly face only exacerbates it. So the expectation women have is that men have to at least present the image of a protector so that they can feel "safe" with him. And if something actually does happen, it only needs to happen once. When it does, who is it that's going to be thrown in harms way? You? No. It's going to be the man. So at the very leas…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 09:20 PM
3

Not only are you wrong, but you're also disregarding all of the unpaid male gender roles women expect of men. If he's the protector and emotional rock, then women should perform even more of the domestic labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 08:58 PM
3

Nah, the primary bread winner does a smaller proportion of housework. "Dating up" is a term used by men as a recognition of women's hypergamy. We don't believe male teacher's are worth less; women categorize men as "high-value" and "low-value" and men are simply arming themselves with that knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 08:12 PM
3

Good for you. But my views remain consistent: if he earns less, then he should be doing the house work. But of course, what women say often doesn't align with what they actually do. The stats are clear; most women do not date men who earn less than them because they consider a man's worth to be tied to his income. Even in your other replies you say that dating a teacher means that you're "dating down".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 07:23 PM
3

No one is talking about value. I'm talking about proportionate reciprocity. You're inserting your own projections about a man's worth being tied to his income. Don't like it? Go marry a burger flipper and turn him into a house hubby.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 07:15 PM
5

You sound like a feminist. No, you split housework based on income. If you don't like that, date poor men. they should make their wives a homemaker If they earn more and live up to this traditional male gender norm, then the expectation should be that women do most of the domestic work. You're conveniently ignoring the part where I say it should be a proportionate contribution. marry a higher income earning woman Men typically don't have much of a choice in the matter since women are the one's t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 07:11 PM
3

Who said full time? It's a matter of proportionate contribution. If he's making 70% of the household income, then he sure as hell shouldn't be doing 50% of the domestic work. Again, if women don't like that, then they should date poor men. Oh wait, men earning less is one of the major predictors of separation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 06:50 PM
2

Because bringing in more money is a traditional male gender norm, so if the man is the primary breadwinner, then at the very least women can perform most of the domestic work. If women don't like that, then they can freely choose men that earn less. But they won't, since the house-hubby is a myth pushed by virtue-signaling feminists. Moreover, women's expectations of men in relationships is rarely limited to just that of provider - most women still expect men to be the protectors and emotional r…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 06:40 PM
1

The minimization of misandry or the outright denial of its existence is an example of women lacking empathy for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 06:20 PM
6

Despite "progress" made by feminists, you'll find that they've done very little to challenge women's traditional expectations of men. They may have modernized those expectations a little, but only so far as to solely benefit the woman. For example, a common feminist critique of modern relationships is that men don't contribute equally to things like housework. Aside from the obvious solution being that women should stop choosing those men, what they conveniently leave out is that the man is stil…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 05:57 PM
3

You. Most men would not Also you. are quite common Classic feminist double speak. You're just disguising your hatred of men with more palatable phrasing.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 05:14 PM
10

Found the simp.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 01:23 PM
8

There's nothing wrong with slut shaming. Go cry some more.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 01:22 PM
0

It's not obvious since we are talking about dating. Again, by your reasoning the man always pays.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 08:11 PM
1

So dense you sink the bathtub. Check out r/FemaleDatingStrategy and ask them how they feel when a man asks to split the bill.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 08:10 PM
1

Then you've obviously never dated a woman. Men feel MOST pressured by women. It's a minority of women that offer to split or pay. The dude isn't attention whoring. He's not looking for validation on social media like she is. At this point I'm just assuming your willfully dense.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 06:14 PM
1

It's more than likely that she's the kind of woman that couldn't give less of a shit about paying given how much she likes attention on social media.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 06:01 PM
1

People here are from different cultures and backgrounds but if you are not satisfied go out and ask people. Where are you pulling the "society is pressuring men" thing coming from then. You must be living on another planet then. You are the one that needs to go outside. Okay dude, you are straight up circling around my point. What if she made it verbally clear that she wanted to pay yet he paid for her. Then he wouldn't be asking for his money back AND she wouldn't be attention whoring on social…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 05:54 PM
1

It's not because he got no coochie. It's because she knew she wouldn't be seeing him again and still didn't pay for her meal. And the least she can do is not ghost.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 05:51 PM
1

You whine about the word "thot", but like name-calling in bed. You may not call yourself a feminist, but you're a feminist.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 05:08 PM
2

omg you're talking about me aren't you?? yeah...
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 04:49 PM
2

A feminist hoe with a rape fetish in her post history. Hahaha. You can't make this shit up.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 04:46 PM
2

Crazy how all the hoes are revealing themselves in this thread.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 04:34 PM
1

Which is why the guy in OP's post seeks compensation.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 04:15 PM
1

He sent her a bill because she knew she wouldn't see him again and still didn't pay for her portion of the meal. Show me where he said he's owed sex? If you interpret this any other way, you're definitely a particularly dumb kinda' bitch.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 03:23 PM
1

The fact that your response just amounts to a wall of text screeching about "being owed sex" is laughable. I'll say to you what I said to the other guy that uses a similar fallacy. No one is saying that the guys thinks he's owed sex. It's hyperbole. This is just a shaming technique that feminists use to shut down men with legitimate grievances. You're making gross generalizations about men and applying it to this situation. But if this girl expected to not see this guy again, then she is obligat…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 03:20 PM
1

Women aren't owed free meals.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 03:10 PM
1

By the sheer amount of both men and women here that suggest going halves it seems that men aren't as pressured as much as you think. Kind of moronic to think this thread is a representative sample of the real world. she is bringing to light someone who thinks is owed sex just because he paid for a dinner. Contradicts By OP I meant the parent comment, which is by a girl you said was a hoe that is also using men as ATMs. You're assuming the guy was expecting sex. Again, hyperbole. No one is saying…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 02:51 PM
1

No idea where you got your idea that OPs is using anyone as human ATM, either. Because she went on a date with him, got a free meal, and ghosted. It's not difficult to grasp. And how is that victim blaming? You can always suggest going halves, but why are you not doing it? Because men are socially pressured to offer. And if a woman doesn't expect to see a guy again, then she needs to pay for her portion. It's on her. Neither I, nor you know how the date went. What if the girl suggested to pay, y…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 02:35 PM
1

How would he know that he's going to get ghosted? Only she would know, and accordingly should woman up, grow a pair of ovaries, and pay for her meal. Dumb. Ass.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 02:28 PM
-1

As if women want to be treated like humans not some sex vending machines. No idea where you got that from from all of this since we're talking about texting. Way to be hyperbolic. If you have the slightest doubt someone is using you for a free meal, don't pay for it. Victim blaming. If you have the slightest expectation that you won't be seeing someone again after the first date, then pay for your half of the meal, dumbass.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 02:20 PM
-1

The only scheme here is hos like you that go on dates for free food without any intention of getting to know a guy. It's almost as if men want to be treated like humans and not walking ATMs.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 02:14 PM
1

The guy is nearly ALWAYS the one that invites out. By your reasoning, he'd be paying all the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 01:38 PM
2

You sound angrier than anyone here.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 01:37 PM
2

Then she should cover he half of the bill, dumb ass.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 01:33 PM
-1

Found the ho that uses men for money.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 01:31 PM
2

This is you all day, but ok. No you. Again, you're just mad about women earning more than you from selling sex. That's is pathetic. How much do I earn, moron? No I just like putting in their places incels like you. I like to educate people like you who seems to have some socials disorder. You didn't put anyone in their "place". The only person getting put in their place is you, and if you can't see that then you are more lost than I thought. Again, stop using non-sense words like "incel". You're…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 02:35 PM
6

You're so delusional. You know nothing about me and make assumptions based strictly off Reddit posts. Take your armchair psychology elsewhere. You talk more out of your ass than anyone else in this thread. It's not successful to have money from whoring. That's what you don't get. You've been so brainwashed that you think this is something to normalize. For a man with a "wife and career" you sure get passionate about defending e-thots. I wouldn't be surprised if you were into cuckoldry. Don't wor…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 02:21 PM
5

Keep white knighting, cucky. She'll let you lick her boots eventually. But really, nothing more pathetic than men like you that reflexively jump at defending sex "workers".
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 02:10 PM
3

God, you sound like such a whiny little bitch.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 01:48 PM
1

Ohhh, a pussy.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 01:46 PM
0

You sound mad. Like your partner's boyfriend didn't let you play on your computer today.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 01:33 PM
-3

It's called an analogy, dumb cuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 01:19 PM
9

Buddy, it's not just "incels" (or whatever other Reddit buzzword you want to use) that are saying this. Any sensible man that isn't brainwashed says this.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 01:15 PM
16

There is no fucking difference.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/21 02:11 PM
4

Look up the definition of rape and you'll find that it only refers to penetrative sex. But we all know that women can rape men. Therefore the definition is flawed and reasonable people can choose to ignore it and include "being made to penetrate" as part of the true definition of rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/21 04:26 PM
1

When people talk about toxic masculinity, they're talking about the men that women are attracted to for short term flings. Everything you say is so canned that it borders on memes. Later, bitch.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/21 03:19 PM
3

Hahaha. Keep drinking the kool-aid, buddy. The future is going to be a lot of woke men that don't put up with third wave feminism anymore. You're hurting more than you're helping with that ignorance. It's interesting that you claim that I'm the one whining about sexism, when feminism is rooted in a sense of victimhood. Maybe those women should work on themselves too. Enjoy your divorce rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/21 03:02 PM
3

You're an ignorant person that thinks they're doing good, but instead just perpetuates more misandry and hate. You should feel like a failure of a human being.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/21 02:21 PM
5

You're such a fucking dumbass, my god. How fragile are women's egos for not having their own science class? See what I did there? I used the same bullshit shaming tactics as you. Go fuck yourself. I'm glad more men are wisening up to the toxicity of third wave feminism. Go choke on your wife's boyfriend's dick.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/21 01:33 PM
13

Fuck off, misandrist.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 02:09 PM
12

Fuck off with your anti-male propaganda. Diversity and any other preferential hiring practices are bigoted. Period. Dumb, cucked male feminist.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 02:07 PM
2

You're in a relationship and have baby on the way and you're still simping for egirls? Sad.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 07:20 PM
1

It's not. It requires no effort or skill. And they most certainly do not all get taxed. Later, ho.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 06:20 PM
2

Dude, just stop. She's not going to sleep with you.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 05:36 PM
14

Equal rights, equal lefts.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 05:22 PM
1

All the false equivalency in these types of threads is hilarious. Don't compare jobs that require actual skill, time, effort, and talent to being an ewhore. One moron compared being in the military to thotting. Hahaha. Try again, simp.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 05:15 PM
6

Sex work is not real work.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 05:04 PM
1

No, I said for YOU to look at the thread. There's plenty of information elsewhere. You're just to dense to see it. Hm. Maybe you should make an Only fans. I doubt you'll go far elsewhere with such poor reading comprehension.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 04:48 PM
18

People that believe in true gender equality are on here.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 04:42 PM
1

Holy fuck you're dense. Read through this thread and take note as to why these men aren't just finding free porn online. It's because the thots engage with these guys and emotionally string them along. It's an industry that preys on weak, porn addicted men.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 04:41 PM
1

Honestly, if you don't get it now, you never will. You don't have to harass someone to manipulate them... Like what the fuck are you even thinking? Those women are profiting off sexually disenfranchised men. That's their target. They know it and play it up with their interactions. Sure, those men "choose" to throw money at them, but don't act like these e-hookers don't know what they're doing. You want those emotionally vulnerable people to get help? Then stop normalizing the thing that keeps th…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 04:29 PM
1

I never said men in general. I said particularly the emotionally and socially vulnerable ones. At least try to feel some empathy toward men and not just the OnlyThots that profit off them. Nice attempt at strawmaning I guess?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 04:15 PM
2

Actually I don't watch porn. But no, you're wrong. The whole ewhore game is about taking money from lonely men under the guise of emotional connection. It's manipulation. You can deny it all you want, but that's just you're lack of empathy showing.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 04:04 PM
0

Oh, boohoo. Thots can't make as much money by manipulating emotionally vulnerable men. You're the only unempathetic one here.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 03:54 PM
27

I know you think you're being clever and that this is a "gotcha" moment for you, but you're just cringey as fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 03:34 PM
1

Nah, I'm not one of your simps. Sex work is most definately not work. Not even comparable to being in the military, being a waitress, or what have you. It's best described as female privilege really. You've been drinking way too much feminist kool-aid.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 03:33 PM
1

Sex work is not real work.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 03:06 PM
1

Sex work is not real work. Get over yourself, thot.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 02:45 PM
45

Does it physically hurt being such a simp like you?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 02:39 PM
8

Right. President Cheeto Dust is obviously the authority on medicine.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/20 03:01 PM
12

Hahahahahaha. Brainwashed. Bro, your mind has obviously been through the heavy duty cycle. Don't forget to wash your hands and wear the mask above your nose, buddy.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/20 03:00 PM
28

Shut the fuck up. Masks and their relevance to culling the spread of disease is scientific fact. There's nothing controversial about it if you're not a moron.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/20 02:25 PM
7

Looks like someone's been drinking their stupid juice.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/20 02:18 PM
4

If driving a couple of hours or spending money for sex is your idea of humiliating, then welcome to being a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 12:56 AM
2

Those women made their decisions and if they can't learn from it, then it's their fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 12:41 AM
1

I mean... To even have a sexual history you need to be able to write things down or keep a record. There's no Manebook (hue hue hue) for lions to post about their wild 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 09:16 PM
1

So, meh?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 06:38 PM
1

How's the tiddies?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 06:28 PM
3

The mods are armchair psychologists now?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 06:22 PM
3

His anaconda don't want none Unless you've got buns, hun
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 06:21 PM
0

They make those "mistakes" over and over again because they like the abuse. It's not socialization. It's a female submission fantasy rooted in biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:59 PM
9

You're really trying to flex that oppression card, huh? What's wrong? Did someone manspread in your presence today?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:48 PM
4

That's moronic. Non-human animals don't have value systems.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:43 PM
6

Why do people keep perpetuating this bullshit? It's common knowledge now that Instagram and casual hook ups with Chads that are looking for quickies distorts her perception of her SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:36 PM
0

What a leap in logic! Maybe you just shouldn't be so sensitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:23 PM
0

I don't give a shit whether you asked or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:20 PM
1

I repeat, again, and again, and again... It's the casual aspect of these hookups that leaks into her preferences for long term relationships. The whole discussion started by asking the question, "Who is more shallow?". I say women because of unrealistic standard created by hookup culture. And of course, hookup culture is a product of the sexual revolution of the 70's. Primarily driven by feminism. As far as how to address this problem? By and larger a shift away from hookup culture would. There …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:16 PM
1

they are told to stop being bitter and don’t punish the next guy for the previous man’s actions I was mugged by a black guy, therefor I avoid all black men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:11 PM
0

You're still moving your mouth too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:09 PM
2

Because it's endemic and fucks the market. Duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:07 PM
0

You're cuter when you don't talk so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:07 PM
12

You're cuter when you don't talk so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:03 PM
2

You're saying it again... The best a woman can get is a pump and dump. And this doesn't distort the market. LOL. And sweety, your anger is palpable. Barely any men here wish horrid things on these women. That's you projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:03 PM
3

"Bother" is a strong word that you use to paint me as some sort of incel Reddit boogeyman. I'm simply pointing out how this kind of set up completely fucks the dating market. You insist that it's Chad's fault. You're wrong. And how do you still not get it? It's the distorted preferences that develop from being pumped and dumped by men way out of her league that eventually creep into her long term commitments.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:59 PM
6

What is it with mods being such raging cunts?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:55 PM
-1

You're actually not even worth fantasizing over. Case in point: a women over evaluating her own self worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:55 PM
2

You're on this debate sub arguing just as much as me. You seem to have your own frustrations despite being "happily" married.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:53 PM
4

Whole lot of assumptions your making. None of what you claim about me is accurate. What I'm talking about doesn't just affect me, it affects all men and is practically endemic. And I just love how in your mind, a sweetened prize is getting pumped and dumped. Tells a lot about you. And the distortion happens when their preferences for NSA creep into long term relationships. It's really as simple as that and you can't seem to get it through your dense, cum-filled skull.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:50 PM
6

Exactly. This. On top of that, it's Pavlovian. Women reward those men for that behavior, therefor those men continue that behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:47 PM
2

Or she's a cum dumpster.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:44 PM
1

Give it time.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:43 PM
5

What they're attracted to is unrealistic in the long term and caused by a distorted view of themselves from getting pumped and dumped so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:42 PM
1

Enjoy single motherhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:38 PM
0

How what?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:37 PM
2

No, it would expand her dating field to more men. More men means more likely finding commitment. That's where unrealistic standard disrupt the market. Work on your reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:36 PM
3

Haha. Already resorting to personal insults I see. Try harder, sweetie. By your logic, "best they can get" is a pump and dump. And we're not even talking about ugly guys, we're talking about average men that are passed over. Women are to blame because they reward the men that pump and dump them. It's Pavlovian.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:35 PM
9

Pathetic feminist revenge fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:28 PM
6

Your body, your rules, your responsibility, Given that women are the gatekeepers of sex, they're the ones that allow themselves to be pumped and dumped by these men. Stop shifting blame.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:20 PM
2

The preferences are unrealistic because they get those people for NSA then lament when they won't commit. And by that point they're already to far gone to normalize their preferences to men that are more likely to commit. And yes, the usual feminist tactic. Shift blame away from women and put it on men. Your body, your rules, your responsibility, babe.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:18 PM
2

I never said that... But if you're not even going to read my post and fill it with your own bullshit, then go ahead. We're talking about unrealistic preferences of women and how its caused by an overinflated self-evaluation egged on by modern hookup culture. Not the general view that pretty people are pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:10 PM
2

You're just repeating yourself at this point, so I am forced to as well. Your preferences are most definitely influenced by how you view yourself. And how you view yourself is influenced by who you have casual sex with. Period. Saying otherwise is delusion. And of course the blame shifts from women to men... Women are the ones making the choices to sleep with Chads and becoming "alpha windowed". Your body, your rules, you responsibility. Additionally, you're the one assuming the average man is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:03 PM
2

Bullshit. The last line contradicts your entire argument. Most women in today's dating market have an overinflated view of themselves because the market is matching them with "Chads" for casual. And being overweight is a choice. It's not shallow to reject someone for making poor life choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 03:23 PM
2

Again, you're dealing in absolutes. Outliers exist, but by and large women's preferences (requirements) lean that way. Not to mention all of the below average height men that check off every other box that you're discounting. And yes, preferences most definitely reflect your self evaluation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 03:06 PM
2

So you're obviously getting emotional, so this won't be a productive conversation. But the preference (read requirement) for something outside the norm, especially a requirement as ubiquitous as height, is evidence of that. It's reflective of those women's overinflated rating of themselves. I have never met a man that listed an exact number for a woman's hip to waist ratio.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:59 PM
2

I never said that. Of course outliers exist. That's a given. But this thread is discussing who's more shallow and no one mentioned this yet. The average woman's height preferences are far outside the average height of men. I mean, it's no coincidence that 6'+ is around the 80th percentile.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:49 PM
5

Your making an assumption that those men are average just in their facial aesthetics. Height plays a huge role with women and by and large women prefer a height that is way beyond the average.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:36 PM
2

Well, one is actually likely to happen. (Bad date for the man.) The other is a Madmen dystopian fantasy the odds of which are unlikely to occur. And equality is black and white. You're either my equal, or you're not. So let's do away with this "women are oppressed" narrative, yeah?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 02:17 PM
2

The differing impact is feminist propaganda. The fact that you're even trying to dismiss male victims by painting female abuse as less impactful makes you part of the problem. Not to mention, most studies investigating male victims of abuse collect their data by interviewing the women in the relationship, indicating significant underreporting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 02:13 PM
2

All of that is complete bullshit and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 12:00 PM
2

You're entire rant was an emotional knee jerk reaction with no substance. Even resorting to condescension from the get go. Try harder, sweetie.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 01:55 AM
3

You're so transparently mad. Kind of pathetic for mid-30s woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 01:27 AM
3

Then she should have made better choices when it came to her sexual partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/20 10:26 PM
0

It is most certainly a privilege if you don't dive into hyperbole like you do. I've said it before, but if the majority of men that give you attention aren't good enough, then you're the problem, not all those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 11:18 PM
1

You're speaking far to generally and falling into the trap of basing your assessment on the men that you actually notice. Most men are not "big dudes" and do know what it's like to be overpowered by other men. Especially considering men are more likely than women to be victims of violence at all stages of their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 10:54 PM
11

That's probably because you're a woman and not severely limited in choices for sexual partners like the majority of men are. You're speaking from a place of privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 10:45 PM
1

I don't know why you keep insisting needle in the haystack is irrelevant here. That's exactly the kind of scenario this applies to. Because it's wrong. Dating doesn't involve sifting through a mess to find "the one". That doesn't exist. There is "good enough". Taking a gamble. And if/when they're wrong regularly, that's when you get the exasperation tweets about men being terrible. So you agree with me, that women poorly evaluate the men that approach them. Ok I have to spell things out plainly …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 11:30 PM
1

It's not an inaccurate assumption. It's a matter of numbers. Think of it this way: If it smells like shit everywhere you go, check your shoe. Neither, because no woman has the attention, time, or energy to do this. Then how has dating ever existed? We make evaluations of prospective partners and it's far more likely that a woman is picky as opposed to all those men being undesirable. The more I read what you write, I'm realizing that you probably suffer from the woman are wonderful effect
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 11:11 PM
1

No, neither of those apply. You're assuming that the woman's evaluation of them is remotely accurate. Maybe the endless supply of men goes to her head and she experiences FOMO, but definitely not overchoice. Which is more likely? That the one woman fairly assessed these men and that they are all undesirable, or she's just a picky princess. Women being overpursued by mostly undesirable men is a trope that's existed LONG before online apps made the scene. Not to the same degree as today, by orders…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 10:57 PM
1

Neither of those seem to really apply... Men aren't a product put on display for a woman's amusement. They're human beings that are being devalued because of modern swiping culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 10:32 PM
2

You're reading way too much into it. They're just a reiteration of the same sentiment. The position that if finding a relationship is just as hard for women as it is for men is usually defended by saying that women are approached by so many undesirable men. So it's doesn't make it easier for them. That's wrong. The issue is with the one and not the many. In this case, that one woman and these many men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 10:18 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 10:06 PM
1

I reiterate. If not one of those men is good enough for this hypothetical woman, the problem is with the one and not the many.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 09:43 PM
0

That's NiceGuy entitlement. It's not. My argument is that if a woman seems to sift through endless amounts of men and still can't find someone, then the problem is with her standards and not the men. Haha you're so frothy my dude. Just stick to the debate. Right, says the guy that immediately launched into "NiceGuy" shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 09:19 PM
1

Just because some reasons are valid, challenging and pointing out that many are trivial isn't "NiceGuy speak". Do yourself a favor and get off Reddit for a while, you take it way too seriously, buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 09:09 PM
2

As opposed to your shallow attempt at discrediting my argument with an overused Reddit buzzword.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 08:49 PM
6

Cool buzzword, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 06:11 PM
8

That's not at all about what we're discussing... The point of that subreddit is to highlight the pitfalls of hookup culture and dual mating strategies by sharing examples found in the wild. And maybe niceguys/girls should take your advice. Ignore and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 04:38 PM
13

"Standards" is an understatement for what those women are looking for. Overweight, single mothers of 3+ children from two fathers seek well established earners that is no less than 6'.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 04:33 PM
2

I am not incorrect. Getting into a relationship is easier for women as a consequence of how easy it is to find casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 03:37 PM
20

Probably because there are a handful of men that do and you're just conflating that with *all* men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 03:36 PM
14

If those men won't give them what they want, then by definition those men shouldn't be "good enough" to them. But your narrowing your vision too much. The vast majority of women deal with a constant bombardment of male attention. You're telling me that not *one* of those men didn't want just casual sex? I can guarantee there are, but they were rejected for any other number of other trivial reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 03:34 PM
24

Men don't approach for an innumerable amount of reasons, least of all a crippling fear of (cold and humiliating) rejection which is unfortunately very common among young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 03:19 PM
7

No one said men were approaching ugly women, I know a lot of girls who have never been approached. I've never been approached Then maybe you and those women should start approaching. No one said these men weren't "good enough" some random drunkard
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 03:11 PM
7

We both know that's not often how it works in the real world Then why bring it up in the first place? Even if that's not how it works in the real world, it doesn't take away from the bombardment of interest the vast majority of women receive. Moreover, if women aren't approaching and still can't find suitable partners, then once again, the problem is with those women and not the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 03:00 PM
6

> I choose my words very carefully. I said "can", not "do". Do you disagree that men aren't so thirsty that a woman cannot easily get sex if she approaches? I agree, she can. But I think that only reinforces my point. A woman can approach any man she wants. We don't even have to make it about sex. She can probably just as likely get a 'yes' asking him out for coffee.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 02:44 PM
14

> At face value that's true. Most women can walk up to men, offer sex, and likely get it within a handful of tries. Finding someone suitable for a relationship is probably the same level of difficulty that men experience. Completely disagree. If you have regular sexual partners then you have more opportunities for them to evolve into an actual relationship. Moreover, your comment is the exact strawman I'm talking about. Women aren't approaching men; men are approaching women and the women are do…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 02:30 PM
64

Whenever this topic comes up, I always see the usual strawman argument. Women claiming that getting sex is easy, but getting into a relationship is difficult. They claim that there are dozens, even hundreds of men clamoring for their attention and "just sex". I can only imagine the lack of self-awareness needed to maintain this view. If men are still approaching you, yet none of them are good enough, then the problem is with you and not the men. Edit: Okay, I misused the term "strawman".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 02:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter