TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

visarga Archive

View 2 posts and 94 comments by visarga on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

It's not hard to gain 20Kg, deliver babies, suckle babies and care for them until they can move about on their own? Also, to put your career on hold for a year or two.
/r/MGTOW13/09/17 07:13 AM
2

It's true men build almost all infrastructure, but women built men. It's hard to make people.
/r/MGTOW25/08/17 02:45 PM
1

To be honest, most wars are also created by men.
/r/MGTOW25/08/17 02:33 PM
1

Hey, that sounds almost like men are irrational and women rational, when it comes to couple relations. Rational - so to maximize long term benefits instead of short term gratification.
/r/MGTOW25/08/17 02:30 PM
5

She's living with her two kids in a single room in her parents' house, and has no job and no money. If she wanted equality, she would have insisted to have a job, to have autonomy. Talk about privileged women mindset. Not only that, but she's using the children to hurt him emotionally, in revenge for his cheating. As if being a father is less than being a mother and so the children go with her, by default. This is how the MRM feeling of distrust and disappointment originates. Be a man and find y…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:43 PM
0

This is a simple case of a marriage falling apart... the reasons are the husband's fault I doubt this "blame just one side" theory.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:41 PM
4

It's opinion, it doesn't represent the magazine's view.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:23 PM
6

If she gets half his compensation money, he should at least get half of her hand?
/r/MensRights07/02/11 04:28 PM
2

Me too. I have been in charge of washing, bathing, teeth brushing and story reading to my girls ever since. I resent any woman telling me I can't handle taking care of my girls just as well (hint: mother in law).
/r/MensRights19/02/10 06:28 AM
1

The children we are talking about are the result of sexual and emotional urges which present in our bodies because there is a "survival of the species" benefit in them. Society (or our species) has made its decision when it selected these characteristics into our bodies by natural and/or sexual selection.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 07:40 AM
1

as long as reproductive fraud and male disenfranchisement is allowed to continue, there will be a continued increase in this thinking and movements to force a more equatable change in the status quo The fact is - today, with the internet, the cycle of change is much faster. It won't take half a century.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 07:30 AM
1

An interesting idea with nominations. Yet, this could be used as a way of selling children to other people.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 07:02 AM
3

If you want her to keep it, maybe you should have talked about it prior to sticking your penis in her. From another point of view it could be said that she engulfed his penis with her vagina. Sex is not a one person activity from my experience. Shared responsibility. Either way, everyone has the right to do whatever the hell they want with their body and no one else should be allowed to tell them what they can or can't do with it. The imbalance is in controlling reproduction - nature has deemed …
/r/MensRights11/02/10 06:51 AM
5

IMO this will cause more men to avoid having children or getting married. The social damage will be indirect but profound. This fear of the feminist injustice will cost a lot to fix (think hundreds of hours in therapy or wasted years of life for couples who would have been otherwise happy).
/r/MensRights06/02/10 04:37 PM
7

Piece of shit article. Who is this "Creator of Women"? In my book, women were evolved as they are today by men employing the mechanism of sexual selection. Women who had nicer breasts had a better chance to mate and have babies, thus, gradually, their genes propagated more than the others. There's no "creator". The reverse is also true - the male body has been designed by women, also by sexual selection.
/r/MensRights28/01/10 11:17 AM
3

Read up. The Philippines society is actually very traditional. The prostitutes hide their trade from their families in shame. They come to the cities from remote villages telling their parents they got decent jobs as waitresses or something.
/r/MensRights23/12/09 07:19 AM
-1

it's a trap. biological urges vs. obscure law, what will happen.... hmm
/r/MensRights01/12/09 03:32 AM
5

The image is missing.
/r/MensRights28/11/09 07:51 AM
1

I too think the article could have been better. More sources, less emotional posturing. We need it bulletproof and printed in a book. We have to engage women in dialogue to test the weak points and fix them. I think the MR revolution will happen at 10x the speed of feminism. Just wait until the male thinking rigor and creativity will start to focus on this and you bet we'll have a full university course in 2-3 years.
/r/MensRights26/11/09 08:50 AM
1

If we lose the top spot it's all for the better. Let the women build skyscrapers and railroads for a decade or two. We could cook and rear babies just as well. Maybe that way men will be described by more epithets than "pig". We might be heading into an unknown direction, I don't immediately think that women will be better as leaders. With men we know the weaknesses, with women as leaders... who knows what will happen.
/r/MensRights25/11/09 06:43 AM
1

LOL :-)
/r/MensRights25/11/09 06:16 AM
1

It's a little off-topic, but do you know where is the epicenter of MR movement? I haven't researched this but my guess is that it is on /r/mensrights right here on reddit. Is it so?
/r/MensRights24/11/09 05:26 AM
1

This is sure to call out the feminatzies.
/r/MensRights17/11/09 05:17 AM
4

I am sure the MRA redditors won't stand for a less than perfect Wikipedia entry on our topic. We should also include the feminist critiques and our replies otherwise the feminists are going to feel invited to bitch about how slanted and biased the article is.
/r/MensRights16/11/09 12:58 PM
10

We don't hate females or consider them somewhat less than men. We just want our side of the equality in rights upheld. We've all been born from women, it's not like women are alien creatures to us.
/r/MensRights15/11/09 08:01 PM
24

I read the article and found it is very unprofessional. We need to pitch in, especially those of us who have published before on Wikipedia, to provide links to scientific studies and newspaper articles and remove all the subjective sounding expressions like "It is considered that..." or "Contrary to many...". We need this article bullet proof and it is not.
/r/MensRights15/11/09 07:59 PM
1

It's evidence of a bias in the English language itself.
/r/MensRights31/10/09 06:22 AM
1

They I must have been a big baby because I was in love with my wife (and loved her too, which is a different thing) all the way.
/r/MensRights24/10/09 06:56 PM
-4

Probably has had some emotional trauma caused from men.
/r/MensRights24/10/09 06:39 PM
4

I hope she will carry the stigma of rape liar all her life wherever she goes to work or marry. Maybe the state should refuse to emit a marriage license to her if she ever finds a man stupid enough to want her. Of course there are degrees in rape lie. For example it is one thing to lie about rape out of the blue and quite another to declare a previous sexual encounter rape post facto. The second is subject to interpretation.
/r/MensRights24/10/09 05:49 AM
4

No, not as much, more. False rape accusations are intentional crimes, lying in cold blood in front of the police, judge and everyone else. The rapist at least hides in shame, doesn't do his crime in plain view in the court room. Probably some rapes are as a result of temporarily losing self control, especially if they are dating. But going in front of medical examiners, police interrogators, judge at the bench and lying to destroy a person is shuddering. What kind of person can she be if she is …
/r/MensRights24/10/09 05:44 AM
4

Still, 9 months is waaaay less than what he would have gotten had her false allegation stuck.
/r/MensRights24/10/09 05:42 AM
2

I know what you mean. I have two girls. For you, expecting a boy, it will be totally different but just as meaningful and satisfying.
/r/MensRights22/10/09 07:36 AM
3

Exactly. The logic "one man can impregnate N women" doesn't consider women's need for love and sex. It's not all about procreation. As women themselves owe their fathers 50% of their genetic material and later in life they need a man to procreate, dehumanizing males is also a self dehumanization. You can't separate men from women. Even in the most weird societies there are always women together with men on all levels, from the lowest to the top. We need to support more cultural appreciation for …
/r/MensRights22/10/09 07:32 AM
2

It was usually the case that mothers are closer to their boys and fathers closers to their daughters. What happened?
/r/MensRights22/10/09 07:30 AM
1

Probably because women can't understand men, not really. Just use men.
/r/MensRights22/10/09 07:29 AM
0

Why not let her pay him compensation? Shouldn't we be equal after all?
/r/MensRights20/10/09 08:54 AM
-2

A good general write on the subject. Yet we are organizing resentment here too.
/r/MensRights17/10/09 05:11 AM
-1

I'm wondering why don't we have more women in hard sciences. Look at the VideoLectures.net top page. Out of 40 speakers, 5 are women. Why would it be so...?
/r/MensRights17/10/09 05:00 AM
4

I have two little girls and it is absolutely amazing :-) They are loving and full of joy every hour of every day. If you think this is a personal sacrifice I would say I never thought of it like that. I bought them an iMac but they are not favoring it over other types of play. I kind of admire that.
/r/MensRights15/10/09 12:58 PM
1

Haha. Old style health insurance and retirement plan. That used to be THE system.
/r/MensRights15/10/09 12:49 PM
1

I don't want it confused with the philosophy that all people should be equal. Just that we are of equal potential when all that is to be considered is one's gender. Otherwise all are valuable in different ways, but there should be no rule imposing criteria for value based on sex. I have heard from my ex mother in law that I can't properly raise kids, being a man. This is how I want to be equal to women - remove gender stereotypes put on men.
/r/MensRights10/10/09 04:57 PM
3

I agree. For utilitarian reasons it is better to focus on mens issues until they have been recognized by society, and have save the Equalist label (or another equivalent one) for later. I am sure it won't take another 100 years to accomplish this revolution. We live in the age of information, after all.
/r/MensRights10/10/09 04:55 PM
2

Ideally.
/r/MensRights10/10/09 04:48 PM
7

Why fall for this mistake of taking a side. Masculism is ok but Equalism is better. It's centered and allows for the discourse to move away from both extremes towards the middle ground.
/r/MensRights10/10/09 06:37 AM
6

In Romania I see a lot of men with their small children in the park, at the playgrounds, taking their children to school and kindergarden and coming at school plays. Sometimes 50%. I was thinking it feels like a new time is coming. This new generation that grew up under communism (which mandated feministic ideals of equality) has taken the message to heart and thinks equality goes both ways -> Fathers can be EQUAL to moms in child rearing. Ironical backfired feminist ploy. Now women have to give…
/r/MensRights10/10/09 06:15 AM
1

In a legalese society as US is now how come men don't have a legal recourse against this kind of injustice?
/r/MensRights02/10/09 11:37 AM
1

In other words women are human too.
/r/MensRights02/10/09 11:36 AM
0

It's ok only if the mother takes the children and goes under the radar. Divorce in Japan = mother takes the children, father is left alone, no child support. An ex prime minster (Koizumi) divorced his wife. Atypically he got the kids. The wife never saw them again. She declares in press she'd like to but it never happened. Now they are adults too. On the other hand she had been pregnant at the time of divorce. Koizumi never saw his third child. The two older brothers also never met their younger…
/r/MensRights30/09/09 07:35 AM
2

What about false rape reports. How are they going to compensate wrongful body mutilations?
/r/MensRights26/09/09 03:09 PM
5

I wonder why? Could it have anything to do with the equality in divorce and custody law?
/r/MensRights26/09/09 02:54 PM
3

Yeah, but it doesn't ad-hominem enough.
/r/MensRights20/09/09 07:06 PM
0

At least the mens rights movement identified a subset of feminists as the real enemy instead of blasting feminism of all kinds in a sweep.
/r/MensRights20/09/09 07:04 PM
2

Why the femi prefix? Do they have an extra hole? We don't call extremist feminists "manatzies".
/r/MensRights20/09/09 07:00 PM
1

feminazi is much more to the point
/r/MensRights20/09/09 06:53 PM
1

As a man I can't call myself a FEMInist. Sorry. Can't wear a skirt either. I might sympathize privately but only with equalist feminists.
/r/MensRights20/09/09 06:51 PM
2

When you say "I'm not a feminist because..." and then go on to espouse real gender equality ideas, you're only further hindering the attempt to usher in a real golden age of feminism They need a name change before the male population are going to adopt it. Would women be open to calling themselves masculist when they in fact support equality? Would you have voted for a liberal if he called himself natzi? It's just a name, after all. He might be a good candidate when judged by his actions, but wh…
/r/MensRights20/09/09 06:46 PM
2

You live in US. Come to Eastern Europe and see the devastation the atheists have done here. Generations of traumatized people, with no moral code except the communist one. Churches razed to the ground. People put in jail for having a religion. All this was before 1989 of course. Now it's much freer, but the "damaged" generations are still here.
/r/MensRights20/09/09 06:41 PM
1

A lot of women are going to find it difficult to marry or live with a man if shit like this keeps on. The mistrust is already very high. Many prefer to marry with a foreigner.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 01:16 AM
1

They'd have to emancipate the women first, then worry about false rape claims.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 08:21 PM
1

On society's top rungs, boys and girls don't show major differences. These develop, in complex directions, as one goes down the socio-economic ladder. In the end it depends on attention. If the parents dutifully observe the education of their kids and encourage them to improve they will improve. No kid wants to make a homework that neither the parents nor the teachers spend any time verifying. Probably the less materially fortunate parents don't spend as much time with their kids even though spe…
/r/MensRights07/09/09 07:56 PM
-3

Poor old tycoon. But after 20 years it doesn't matter any more who was the father, except to establish inherited medical risks. Even a single year spent together with a baby is enough to establish the father-child bonds. If he feels like a father, then he is one. If he feels betrayed, imagine what the girl must be feeling - being made into a bastard at age 20, out of the blue. It is especially cruel towards her. If she loves her father, imagine how she must be feeling now, guilty of a fault not …
/r/MensRights01/09/09 07:38 AM
-8

Let's not forget that while the wife is doing the cheating another man in doing the fucking. We are backstabbing ourselves.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 07:38 AM
3

It's about establishing the medical history of the real parents. This might affect the kid's life eventually.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 07:36 AM
3

What if the biological father has a strong history of heart disease, or cancer? Exactly what I was saying. The mother should be sued for criminal medical negligence.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 07:35 AM
0

You mean with regard to child conception, couple separation and medical research?
/r/MensRights31/08/09 09:19 AM
-18

If infant genital mutilation is your thing, then, go ahead. When you are the parent you decide. EDIT: I said it in spite. I think the exact opposite, of course. Observe I didn't say "circumcision", but rather "genital mutilation". I am sure jews don't call it that way.
/r/MensRights31/08/09 08:21 AM
2

Or she could get a job and pay HIM $1000/month alimony. Why not. Women can pay too, as with being equal with men and all...
/r/MensRights28/08/09 05:24 PM
1

They can use a little bit of seduction instead of asking him out point blank. The man can get the idea without explicitly saying it.
/r/MensRights25/08/09 12:19 PM
1

FTA: Ever wonder why women tend to all think the same way and why they desire big, Socialist government over individualism and freedom? And I thought that the opposite of socialist government is a capitalist one. Aren't the conservatives against individualism and freedoms?
/r/MensRights21/08/09 05:25 AM
2

Society taught them to freak out... In other words our public nudity phobia is just a meme. We're not ashamed to expose our faces and hands, men can walk in public without a shirt. In other places like Africa, there are tribal women who live topless. The Nagas in India (a Shaivite sect of men) live fully naked for religious reasons. Kids under 5 regularly are naked at public beaches in many countries. Women spread their legs with very little mental trauma at the gynecologist. Try an experiment: …
/r/MensRights21/08/09 05:04 AM
3

So what if I see a naked body? I appreciate the beauty of the human body of all ages and sexes. They are all interesting in a way or another. If nakedness was a problem, we wouldn't see such suggestive commercials plastered everywhere. I think old men are safe if they managed to survive thus far, with all the nudity in media and all.
/r/MensRights21/08/09 04:54 AM
0

Some guys ruined whole countries & got away with it. (Dubya)
/r/MensRights19/08/09 10:38 AM
4

She expects to have her ex pay for her lifestyle after divorce? And women pretend they want equality. All they want is the privilege to be a grown up child. She wants to be treaten like a child yet be the parent with custody.
/r/MensRights24/07/09 05:57 AM
1

If you have that kind of money, you're much better off having a baby with a surrogate and an egg donor and hire a maid to help you.. wow
/r/MensRights24/07/09 05:56 AM
4

Maybe if the couple makes a joint statement that the man will assume the child and all costs, then OK. Also if the man declares he renounces the position of parent, he shouldn't be liable for child support. The woman has the choice of abortion or single parenting.
/r/MensRights22/07/09 07:14 AM
3

It's the inevitable truth: Women are nothing without men. Yet, originally, we gotta come out of a woman hole. Every one of us.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 01:04 PM
6

6 years old is not toddler. And yes, if he is so retarded, punishment is not at all useful his case.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 10:37 PM
11

I always say, you gotta have a little bit of balance. On the one side we have a fondled, obviously titless 6 years old girl, and o the other side a retarded teenager who got 100 years in prison. Yeah, just about right. I am sure the trauma will haunt the girl for 100 years too.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 10:36 PM
1

The chuildreen! Won't somebody think of the chuildreen! Poor woman, all on her won, two hands, two feet, and no 3 million a month support from her ex.
/r/MensRights01/06/09 10:38 AM
1

Hopefully they will have this stuck on their name for the rest of their lives, and many future false rape "victims" will be discouraged from opening their mouths.
/r/MensRights22/05/09 04:37 PM
6

I like this quote "The legal and social changes occurring through the efforts of feminism only serve those of the group and further disrupt the balance of equality." (Carol Wohlfeil) Basically they can be charged with partisanship - and we cannot base any social policy of the society as a whole on a partisan philosophy.
/r/MensRights11/05/09 07:16 AM
7

The distinction between equality in opportunity and equality in outcome is central, imho. The problem of feminist activists these days is that, after decades of demanding "equality", men see equality going both ways. Men can raise children too, manage a household, be sensitive parents. Women can't monopolize these qualities and shouldn't have preferential treatment in separations.
/r/MensRights11/05/09 06:22 AM
0

it happens
/r/MensRights16/04/09 01:06 PM
8

In related news, a newborn is suing her mother for eating carrots. The newborn is not fond of the new taste of her mother's breast milk. Mother ordered to eat something else.
/r/MensRights09/04/09 12:47 PM
2

She seems capable enough to fend for herself. Wait until she sues her mother too, then she's on her own.
/r/MensRights09/04/09 12:44 PM
1

That's because girls are beautiful and boys are ugly.
/r/MensRights24/03/09 06:18 AM
12

"and yet I know in my heart that I would be mightily hard-pressed to remove this father from his son's house" Oh, Miss God, We bow in front of your teminative powers Which emanate from your feminist heaven, Compared to you we men are mere moderately stinky armpit-scratching shoe-killers. Please Forgive This Poor Man, Amen
/r/MensRights14/01/09 09:30 AM
11

If your partner is not your best friend, why are you married to them. Because the husband is "essentially a checkbook and a sperm bank" (from TFA).
/r/MensRights14/01/09 09:26 AM
4

I know it is old, but this piece is flaming!
/r/MensRights06/12/08 07:27 AM
0

I read an article written by this republican philosopher who declared that "locking women" into monogamous marriage was the key that led the human species into fast evolution in the last 10000 years. Apparently, before, women would take temporary mates for sex, who would later leave them, not caring for their offspring, in search of new "combinations". Men were rootless and didn't do anything worthwhile because "you could never know if the kid was your kid" - so, why work for someone else's? So,…
/r/MensRights24/11/08 06:57 AM
11

US has a perverse pleasure in punishment. You punish more people for more crimes (and "crimes") than any country. Death penalty does not deter killers. It only reinforces the worst of them - they got nothing else to loose after the first kill (well, maybe if you got "death by slow dipping in hot oil" for repeated murderers, maybe). Also, it might be easier for them to get out quick than to serve life in prison. But no, it is a fetish of the masses to kill criminals, we must oblige an give them t…
/r/MensRights10/09/08 05:45 AM
6

Transitionality, you're such an intellectual. Where did they teach you literature?
/r/MensRights28/07/08 06:51 AM
2

Both mother and father should be legally required to pay for the children's expenses. As such, after divorce, even if the mother keeps the child, she should be required to earn money. She should pay too, at least proportional to her income. She should be able to stay at home up to 3years old, then send the kid to kindergarten and school and go to work. And if she doesn't want to work, she should go to prison just like the dad.
/r/MensRights25/07/08 11:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter