TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vladshockolad Archive

View 1 post and 32 comments by vladshockolad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
43

articlevladshockolad/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 02:59 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
54

Yes, I've also noticed how feminists knowingly or unknowingly tap and feed into gender norms, the ones they are so keen on calling "patriarchal". Like "toxic masculinity" vs "internalised misogyny", where a man is portrayed as a self-responsible hyper-agentic subject, and a woman - as a helpless victimised hypo-agentic object. One example that comes to mind is how some feminists would bemoan that the beauty industry targets and profits off of women's insecurities. Yet in the same breath they wou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/26 04:52 AM
14

Arguments don't seem to be the main issue to me. Many men's advocates try to be rational, tend to base their opinions on data and research. And that rationality is exactly what doesn't sell it for many people. Because people are not built for data analysis, they are wired for meaning. And this is exactly what's lacking in most male advocacy for the public to care about our issues. I remember Noah Harari writing that a cooperation between >150 people requires a belief in common myths. The reason …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 12:21 AM
4

Download the book and look it up 👍
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/25 09:27 PM
7

Martin van Creveld - The Privileged Sex would be one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/25 04:15 PM
16

Apex fallacy is boring. And the fact that most of those in power are men does not mean that they hold this power to the benefit of most men at the expense of women. Quite clearly in many cases it's women who are prioritized even when they are least affected. Not that you would change your mind, it's just surprising why a troll like you would end up here. What do you need from the subreddit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/25 09:50 AM
14

On your point of toxic masculinity, you could also ask what non-toxic masculinity is. And the way feminists usually define it is when a man allows himself to cry, when he talks about his feelings, cares for others and so on, rather than well-channeled competitiveness, assertiveness, risk-taking, etc. They effectively end up describing something closer to femininity than masculinity. This means that to them masculinity is either toxic or non-existent, that is masculinity is inherently toxic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/25 09:38 AM
50

The witch hunts were largely perpetrated by women against other women. The white feather movement largely consisted of women shaming men into enlisting. Your comment that women simply internalize misogyny and men "externalize" "toxic masculinity" ironically feeds into the "patriarchy" by denying women agency and assigning, perhaps too much, agency to men. The fact that feminists do this is bizarre, considering how Simone de Beauvoir bemoaned men's self-definition as subjects and a denigration of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 11:37 PM
-14

I understand where you are coming from, but enlisting women leads to an issue of men being displaced from less dangerous military positions into deadly front lines by giving most of the least dangerous tasks to women, as they are generally weaker. How do you resolve it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/25 11:56 PM
29

Well, that's good news. Thank you They are still quite supportive of the male-only Ukrainian mobilization
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 06:22 PM
9

Do read David Benatar's the Second Sexism - it's one of the best so far. And try to be more open-minded to people even if they have opposite views. Also read his response to critique. There he dissects the "patriarchy hurts men too" argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 11:53 AM
12

Whenever I read such pieces of literature, I can't get myself to treat them seriously. The way they are trying to reason is not reason at all - it is storytelling. This is because they are not backed by empirical data, only a subjective perception. For example, the core assumption of the essay is not backed up: "Manhood is equated with power-over women, over other men. Everywhere we look, we see the institutional expression of that power-in state and national legislatures, on the boards of direc…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 12:16 AM
27

There is little evidence that it is beneficial for men. You can isolate a few anecdotes, but overall it doesn't seem to be the case. Feminist thought has become dominant in Academia, it permeated institutions and policies. Yet men's issues are still stagnating and in some cases became worse. Absent correlation, it is unfounded to claim causation.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 07:11 PM
4

Benatar is the goat
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/25 01:46 PM
1

I don't have to entertain obtuse people
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 06:37 PM
1

You are so ingrained in the orthodoxies of feminism, that no amount of reason will help. The same feminist talking points you spew have been debunked
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 05:52 PM
1

There are so many problems with that pretentious line of reasoning you and many feminists propose that I don't know where to begin. But I'm just gonna say a few things. People who throw the word "patriarchy" around never care to prove it exists, they are satisfied with simply assuming it does. There is no doubt, ideologues, including the ones in Academia, will find that assumption plausible. But any critically thinking person would base his claims on evidence, and only then would he propose a fa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 02:57 PM
7

There is a problem in your argument about men's issues stemming from alleged patriarchy. If it were true, we would expect men's issues decrease with the weakening of the "patriarchy". But it's not what we observe. Most liberal democracies today are way less patriarchal then they once were, but men's struggles persist and in some cases multiplied. In effect, you are looking for causation where no correlation exists to begin with. You also fail draw much distinction between different countries and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/25 03:10 PM
19

And they don't want men to have so-called "privileges" commensurate with their military duties. Feminists want equal rights without equal obligations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 11:27 AM
60

It's like saying black victims of homicide a killed by other black people, not whites, and definitely not the police. Therefore BLM is irrelevant, black people are their own problem, they suffer from self-inflicted damage and "toxic blackness", their victims deserve less sympathy just because they share race with the murderers, and so on. The hypocrisy of the Left is self-evident.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 10:38 AM
1

David Benatar - The Second Sexism It's a must read
/r/MensRights18/04/25 11:15 PM
2

I am myself struggling to find well-researched resources on men's issues. It's as if noone cares about men But I encourage you to spend some time reading thetinmen posts on Instagram or here in Reddit. He provides ample resources https://www.instagram.com/thetinmen?igsh=MXNtdXJzcWNmYXgxbQ== An undervalued book is David Benatar's "the Second Sexism". It was an eye-opener for me. But I do feel like the resources are lacking
/r/MensRights08/04/25 01:32 PM
5

Somehow I didn't find it as useful. Maybe I was using the wrong prompts, I don't know. My issue with ChatGPT is that it was trained on data that is likely skewed in favour of women. That is because there are more texts online about women's issues, men's struggles don't seem to be as represented. This is the same issue as with it being trained on primarily English language data. So it may skew its answers towards "the West", ignoring foreign perspectives. I asked it about the gender pay gap. And …
/r/MensRights08/04/25 01:00 PM
2

Are they required to take a "female psychology course"? Does anybody know?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/25 12:58 AM
6

No, the main reason for the 2022 invasion was NATO expansion. To be fair, you can't openly object the war in Ukraine either. You could be sent to a Ukrainian prison just for having a personal chat in Telegram criticising the war. If there is a chance to save countless men's lives, then we should take it. Please watch Jeffrey Sachs. I attached a video link in my comment. He will explain this position better than me
/r/MensRights24/03/25 12:35 PM
3

I totally agree with you. And I support Trump's decision to cease fire as well. Warmongering from afar living in a safe country is very easy. There would definitely be more supporters of ceasefire if the victims were predominantly women. Anyone who warmongers feels entitled to men's lives. Warmongering is not standing with Ukraine, it's standing with the destruction of Ukraine. Already almost one million Ukrainian men are dead and they don't have enough artillery to win the war. Russia is advanc…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 08:48 PM
25

They aren't choosing to fight if they are actively being made to. You know that men are not allowed to leave the country, are abducted on the streets, sent to warzone without proper training and die within weeks
/r/MensRights23/03/25 08:10 PM
20

It's all socialization, I think. Men can form strong bonds with one another. But they typically don't do so on the basis of being a man. If you think of an army, sports team, or a group of sports fans, they can be very close to each other. But this bonding is based on a common interest, goal, or any "doing". Women on the other hand typically form bonds on the basis of being, on the grounds of their gender. This is probably because women are socialized to think of themselves as inherently worthy.…
/r/MensRights20/03/25 12:59 PM
2

Interesting, I didn't know that. Where did you learn about it?
/r/MensRights12/03/25 01:59 AM
38

Ask them if "Kill all men!" also includes George Floyd But please don't think that their behaviour characterizes most women. Otherwise we become just like those girls
/r/MensRights08/02/25 12:09 AM
4

It's pretty much specific to men, since women are not expected to step in to save a man's life. And it's men who are disproportionately more likely to be the victims of violence. And I'm not worried that my feelings would get hurt, they already are hurt by misandry. I care about men's safety and treating them equally. What's crazy is being entitled to men's lives. They already are the main protectors anyway.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 10:51 AM
6

Where is reciprocity in this? What equivalent thing a woman can do to "be a decent human being" towards a male stranger? Modern women would do nothing to help a man. Even simple empathy to men is called "unpaid emotional labour". I wonder who pays men to be the protectors. Besides, if men are expected to step in in many dangerous confrontations, it feeds into male disposability. They would be more likely to be injured and murdered. Moreover, male heroism is never gendered. The vast majority of s…
/r/MensRights07/02/25 09:50 AM
3

Do you, maybe, know the comparison stats for women in the USSR? Most affected by Stalin's repressions were also men by the way
/r/MensRights06/02/25 11:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter