TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vmerc Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by vmerc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I find it hard to believe that people are so stupid to actually believe this shit.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:50 PM
2

It's massively unfair to men, and insulting to women to boot. It's also unfair to anyone who would be receiving the product of those engineers who were allowed to pursue careers with less capability and/or skills. Then consider that these women with inferior skills (I'm referring to the segment who qualified only due to the reduced requirements) will have to constantly compete with men and other women who are naturally better than them at their career. This will result in a lifetime of additiona…
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:47 PM
2

That's fine. What I'm saying doesn't disagree with that.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:32 PM
1

Whoa. No need to trigger. I know it's bad to be silenced by companies. I know it's bad to be manipulated by social malice and the tyranny of the few. You misunderstood the intent of my comment. I just think it's important to keep our attention on what the government is doing while it enjoys the cover of these other "freedom of speech" issues washing out the severity of what their objectives are.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 06:42 PM
4

Don't ever let the expanded definition of free speech distract you from the original and most critical meaning of free speech. The ability to speak AGAINST your GOVERNMENT without fear of retaliation. This means no police action, no getting added to lists, no being targeted for unfair treatment by any government acency.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 06:08 PM
1

Those are the years they can still barter proximity to their good looks for financial gain.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 02:02 AM
1

Overall, people are too hung up on "private parts". It's the context that matters. If you have a guy flashing women in the street at night it's a threatening act, sure. But pretty much any unexpected action when a person is in a vulnerable state can be threatening. I don't think that we should by extension be prosecuting people if they have some other reason for being naked in public. Why can't people swim naked? Or get changed in the open? But clearly this feminist display is meant to be shocki…
/r/MensRights28/07/19 02:31 PM
1

It's not a bad idea to introspect. It's good to be better for the next one.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:30 AM
3

Interesting. A good explanation, but I don't think many share that interpretation with you. So, short of the absolute impossibility of true communism, what would you say is the closest viable form of government you support? Edit: and what country has gotten closest to what you would define as true communism?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:35 PM
6

OK, so how can you be communist/socialist and not consider yourself leftist? Also, I'm about to start reading "A Gulag Archipelago". I would say I'm excited to read it, but I think it's more of a necessary read for enlightenment than it is a pleasure to read.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 05:28 PM
4

Interesting. So you definitely support abortion, and are conservative? A rare breed indeed.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 05:10 PM
6

Clearly the only solution is to make sex illegal until both parties sign a binding contract and get licensed to procreate.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:46 PM
0

Now we understand the viewpoint of the liberal. "Babies are parasites". WTF?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:43 PM
1

Subway always has single occupant bathrooms. At least in every subway I've been to, which is many.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:37 AM
15

Using a script written by a man. Just saying.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:29 AM
1

The father is not in the picture to begin with. Let's find out if he even cares. If the mother loses custody, then this school age child goes through the trauma of not being raised by either parent. I'm sure you don't understand what that means. Edit: but to one of your points, I agree that a father would probably not get such a lenient sentence. Which is unfortunate and unjust.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 06:24 PM
1

Why do so many insist on such extremes all the time? It's like we've all forgotten that the experience of life is a constant balance of countless factors. Based on your logic, the woman should be drawn and quartered, then burn at the steak all the people who didn't throw their body in front of her vehicle. Then she the automaker out of existence while we're at it. Hell, auto's are dangerous, let's destroy all passenger vehicles so this can't happen again. And let's create a test for reproduction…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:49 PM
1

Do you have those statistics? I couldn't find anything at the moment.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 07:22 PM
0

You would classify his home as abusive based on the limited information you have?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 07:21 PM
-2

It's very easy to read about it and judge from a neutral emotional state. But I can tell you this, children who grow up in foster homes or as orphans fare significantly worse than children who live in homes with imperfect parents. Only 6% of aged out foster children graduate from college 40% of aged out foster children end up homeless 25% of aged out foster children do not even have a high school diploma or GED 30% less foster children compared to non foster children held jobs by age 24 The aver…
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:54 PM
1

Can anyone find the video?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 04:33 PM
-5

If you're considering what's good for the child, destroying the mother and putting her in prison for his entire childhood is not it. She made a terrible decision, but this is the kind of thing that isn't likely to happen again.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 04:33 PM
13

Yes, but how to give it teeth when they are considered minors?
/r/MensRights12/04/19 04:41 PM
1

Is the picture related?
/r/MensRights04/04/19 12:53 PM
3

Correct. It's almost impossible to get to an indoctrinated individual. They have to come to the realization as though they have done it on their own. It can happen, but you'll never figure out what that trigger is. Those who are unaware are the ones who still have an open mind. It's important to make that your target audience and avoid insulting their intelligence. Not saying OP was condescending here, but it happens and it's not helpful.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 12:19 PM
2

Exactly. The reasonable masses are all too often complicit in allowing the radical fringes to define them. In all cases, not just feminism. It's very hard to counter. How do you effectively negate the assertions of someone who doesn't represent you, but will still be generalized into your group? In almost every case people don't have an opportunity to speak for themselves and opinions are formed without their involvement. This is a big reason why "toxic masculinity" has been able to gain so much…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:49 PM
28

Amazon, thanks for helping these poor women who aren't able to run their business successfully without your help. (Liberal's secret though process)
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:23 AM
3

What I don't understand is why the sensitivities change on the remaining parts according to the infographic.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:29 PM
1

Ok, but still too large of a difference for the math to work, even with generous estimates.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 04:54 PM
1

What region are you referring to, because your numbers about college attendance rates are inaccurate for the US.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:32 PM
16

I question the math.. Unless there's more men having sex with men than there are men having sex with women, that statement can't be true. Assuming heterosexual events, on average for every man having sex there's exactly as many women having sex. If it's one man having sex with 6 partners, but 6 women having sex one partner, it averages the same.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:35 PM
8

You make a great point by asking these questions. Men's identity is under attack by feminism because without an identity, you are oppressed and isolated. The objective of feminism is to oppress men. Your questions show that their efforts are working. A movement that works in good faith raises up the group it speaks for without damaging others, but as we've seen in so many cases, the primary activity of the feminist movement is to attack men. Luckily, there are many women out there who see femini…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter