vmos Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Men are more likely to get in a violent confrontation, but whatever I guess. Not buying what? That dealing with the problem or even talking about the causes of the problem is better than whining about who's getting hurt most? Call me a crazy liberal leftie sjw cuck if you like, but I don't care who's getting assaulted, I just want to figure out if anything productive can be done to deal with the causes.	/r/MensRights	10/09/20 06:02 PM
-4	Men are more likely to get in a violent confrontation, but whatever I guess. Here's me suggesting that we deal with the problem and you're arguing against that? If that isn't the very definition of privileged whataboutery, I don't know what is.	/r/MensRights	10/09/20 03:05 PM
-5	Men are more likely to get in a violent confrontation, but whatever I guess. Then maybe we should address that issue to the benefit of men and women instead of engaging it unhelpful whataboutery	/r/MensRights	10/09/20 12:20 PM
-22	Men are more likely to get in a violent confrontation, but whatever I guess. Who's doing the assaulting?	/r/MensRights	10/09/20 09:16 AM
1	Truth hurts and the first Charlies Angels movie. I went to the cinema to see that	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/11/19 08:40 AM
1	The double standard of having a choice on whether or not you want to be a parent. well now that's even more misleading. The "failure rate" should be the likelihood of something not working in any one given use. For some folks a whole years worth of fucking might consist of a quick fumble round the back of the bins followed by vomiting on your shoes	/r/MensRights	30/09/12 09:33 AM
1	The double standard of having a choice on whether or not you want to be a parent. Well, that entirely depends on how well you know the person, but if your default position is that the pill isn't being taken it properly, then that's probably playing it safe	/r/MensRights	29/09/12 09:44 PM
1	The double standard of having a choice on whether or not you want to be a parent. Right, so the failure rate is lower if they're taking it properly? Well, if someone tells you they're on the pill, there's an implication that they mean they're taking it properly, but then you have to ask yourself, "How much do I trust that this person isn't lying and/or mistaken?" that's the point where either or both parties could be at fault	/r/MensRights	29/09/12 08:56 PM
1	The double standard of having a choice on whether or not you want to be a parent. an understanding of 5% risk of pregnancy (due to failure rates of the pill) how many people know that? I didn't know that. Sure contraception isn't perfect, but 5%?	/r/MensRights	29/09/12 02:11 PM
2	I've finally found the true meaning of 'feminism.' not exactly, to pick an example COMPLETELY at random, look at christianity. In particular the bits about preaching and converting people to christianity, that's all well and good for christians but if you try to convert someone who's already happy with their religion then there's going to be an argument, particularly if they're trying to convert you to their religion. If you're just trying to make things good then that's good for everyone, except arseholes	/r/MensRights	12/06/10 08:27 AM
-1	My Friend Frank. Why I'm never getting married. this isn't a reason to not get married, it's just a reason to not get married to an asshat	/r/MensRights	08/06/10 06:10 PM