volmaaktgebalanceerd Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Do you regret how you lost your v card? No, because I don't remember how and with whom.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/02/19 02:27 PM
1	A man can have standards Yes, everyone always says "Others can do this and no one bats an eye but when I do it everyone is angry" and when you ask the others they say the exact same thing in reverse. I'm not impressed; it seems like people often have this underdog complex where they want to believe the world is systemically against them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/02/19 11:31 AM
3	Do you believe having a high N-count effects men and women differently? No. Human beings, whether humans with twigs and berries or humans with little beans and a front hole both only rack up a high n count one way. Sadness and desperation. Oh yes man Genghis Khan with its 800 spouses or whatever was so sad and desperate at the top of the largest land empire ever.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/02/19 11:16 AM
2	Do you believe having a high N-count effects men and women differently? Everything affects every individual differently and there are correlations in what way it affects with pretty much any group you can draw through individuals.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/02/19 11:13 AM
3	Q4Men what would you do if your wife/ girlfriend demand that you spend equal or more amount of money on her than you have on any other woman before? Why would it be expected you spend money on people beyond the fee for transport to go meet them?	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/02/19 08:43 AM
2	In your opinion what does it mean when someone says, “I need to find myself”? I mean it's far easier to say what you don't want than what you do want. If I order you a menu that contains 9 magnificent meals and one steaming cow dump on a plate it's a lot harder to answer which of the 10 you will pick opposed to which you will definitely not eh.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 10:53 PM
1	Why do women always claim that the man who gets the woman when she is older, more mature and wiser is luckier than the guy who banged her when she was young/hotter. I don't deny that OP isn't really debating in any way in this thread; I'm just saying that this is not a CMV so OP should not be held to the standards of a CMV. This is a discussion so OP should be held to the same standard as everyone else and the thread should stand on its own merit; not on OP's behaviour in that thread.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 09:26 PM
2	Why do women always claim that the man who gets the woman when she is older, more mature and wiser is luckier than the guy who banged her when she was young/hotter. But this is not a CMV post; this is a discussion post. I don't think OP at any point professed or pretended to be interested in a CMV post.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 06:48 PM
1	Discussion - Study shows that women, even feminists, are attracted to men who are benevolent sexists. Obviously not when you say that the only alternative to heterosexuality and homosexuality is asexuality. Especially in a debate about sexism where it started with "homosexuality and heterosexuality are sexist therefore sexism isn't bad" that the point is that bisexuality is not sexist.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 06:16 PM
1	Discussion - Study shows that women, even feminists, are attracted to men who are benevolent sexists. Nope. Both of them are obviously superior to the other option of asexuality. You know that there are more bisexuals than homosexuals right? Apart from that "sexual orientations" are a social invention of the western world in the 1880s; it's a box people choose to put themselves in and worth nothing more than that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 05:30 PM
4	Why do women always claim that the man who gets the woman when she is older, more mature and wiser is luckier than the guy who banged her when she was young/hotter. I agree; I challenged the OP but it should not be removed on a sub that is about specifically debating these issues.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 05:28 PM
7	Give a summarization of your interpretation of the different pill stances Red Pill: Bullshit based on Americacentric media stereotypes Blue Pill: Bullshit based on Americacentric media stereotypes Purple Pil:l Bullshit based on Americacentric media stereotypes:	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 04:44 PM
–	Why do women always claim that the man who gets the woman when she is older, more mature and wiser is luckier than the guy who banged her when she was young/hotter. Yeah except you who said: WOMEN value the love and commitment of one established man as a HUSBAND (not as their demon lover)	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 04:09 PM
–	Why do women always claim that the man who gets the woman when she is older, more mature and wiser is luckier than the guy who banged her when she was young/hotter. Actually research at least indicates that females are less interested in relationships and marriage than males are on average. The difference is just smaller than with sex. https://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/women-are-happier-single-as-being-in-a-relationship-means-more-work-/ This whole idea of "males want sex; females want love" is nonsense. Males are the ones who want both sex and love; the difference is just smaller in the latter case. Now historically females like everyone else wanted …	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 04:03 PM
6	Why do women always claim that the man who gets the woman when she is older, more mature and wiser is luckier than the guy who banged her when she was young/hotter. There is nothing "women" "always" say; in fact for any group there is nothing the group "always" says. This sub really has a fetish to of turning "some people who belong to this group once said this" into "this entire group always and constantly says it"	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 03:59 PM
1	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? Well except if they're Polish I guess.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 01:27 PM
1	(Discussion) Is becoming a top 20% woman as difficult as becoming a top 20% man? You assume that having a good job and career is "made" in reality 80% of that again is just how rich your parents were.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 11:52 AM
3	CMV: Most women don't have 'rape fantasies' For both males and females the number of individuals who has passive rape fantasies (being the victim) is about 50% and active (being the perpetrator) is about 30%. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_fantasy#Fantasy So it depends on your definition of "most" here. The weird thing is more that people always talk about this being a specifically female thing whilst the numbers are very comparable in males on both ends.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/19 09:05 AM
2	How would you feel about a man in his late 20's with an 18 year old wife? I would think pretty much the same as an 18 year old married to an 18 year old. I just think marriage is a bad idea and that 18 years old is certainly too young but hey it's your party. Would you try to distance yourself from this man in the future? I think anyone who marries either a normal fool, a sentimental fool, or strategically malevolent but I'd think people who get married at 18 to be bigger fools than those who get married in their late twenties so I would sooner stay away from the 18 y…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 11:18 PM
1	CMV: There isn't a single significant male privilege Hence I said "based on anything other than their own relative attributes".	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 10:34 PM
6	Slut walks are as stupid as if men had virgin walks If they celibacy walks maybe or "I wait before marriage walks" which a lot of people do take pride in. The big difference between "slut shaming" and "virgin shaming" is obvious. Virgins unless they are celibate or wait for marriage are typically not virgin by conscious choice; sure a lot do not care but a lot are also trying to lose their virginity; often they are trying to do something and don't succeed. The difference is that sluts succeed at what they are attempting to do. I always found this…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 09:45 PM
1	Would you ever marry or ltr a woman who has had a MMF threesome? lol is this the new excuse sluts are using? No, just pointing out that the hymen is largely a myth. Has nothing to do with justifying whatever sexual behaviour. I'm just saying that it's a myth that the hymen persists after puberty. also, why do you think "under 20" is a bad thing? 18-20 year old girls are the most attractive to the vast majority of men of all ages. Because you're going to be hard pressed to find anyone who's willing to marry under that age.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 08:47 PM
1	Would you ever marry or ltr a woman who has had a MMF threesome? Well in fairness I wasn't replying to your point as much as to the awkward phrase "woman enough".	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 07:36 PM
2	Would you ever marry or ltr a woman who has had a MMF threesome? You are aware that the hymen naturally dissolves on its own during puberty right so you're looking at people like under 20 to marry.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 07:23 PM
1	Would you ever marry or ltr a woman who has had a MMF threesome? "to be woman enough" isn't even an idiom though—it sounds kind of forced. Should be noted that the word "man" has a longer history being gender-neutral; this gendered meaning some people came up with is a fairly recent development so it's entirely possible the expression "man enough" dates from long before this gendered meaning to the word and that that is why "woman enough" hardly exists but honestly people also say "man enough" when applied to a female.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 07:20 PM
1	Would you ever marry or ltr a woman who has had a MMF threesome? "Are you secure or man enough" is bullshit weasel language and you know it. Correct Whether or not a man chooses to marry or not marry a doubleteaming slut has nothing to do him being "man enough" Just like this is weasel language.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 07:18 PM
1	Why do childless people constantly feel the need to both attack parents and children and defend their own choices from who? The only reason people call it "divorce rape" is because they first convinced themsleves that rape is a gendered issue which it isn't so they need a "counter gendered issue" to fire back and use the word "rape"; like of all the possible analogies rape makes the least sense. The phrase "divorce theft" makes a lot more sense than "divorce rape" for the concept.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 05:38 PM
1	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? Such things have happened many times before, what just happens is that the language and cultures hybridize a bit which is what is already happening. There's an increasing number of Turkish loanwords into Dutch and there are already "Turkish-Dutch" speciality dishes which you won't find in Turkey. In fact it has happened before in the Netherlands very recently with the indo assimilation. About 40% of the Netherlands has some amount of Indonesian ancestry; it just assimilated and hybridized with a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 04:45 PM
1	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? Well here they do. In fact their parents tend to complain that their Turkish and Berber is highly Dutchified. Like the mayor of Rotterdam is originally Moroccan and if you close your eyes and hear it speak there is no accent descernible as is common with people who came here during their youth.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 03:55 PM
1	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? And again, why do I care? Especially because "Dutch" vs "non Dutch" is just code for "white people" vs "brown people". The largest immigrant group in the Netherlands are apparently Germans but everyone is talking about Turks and Moroccans because they're brown rather than white.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 03:52 PM
2	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? Yeah the US kind of has this weird fear of certain words which can be replaced by words that mean the same thing like with all the bleeps on TV too. It's so arbitrary like "coloured person" is highly offensive apparently but "person of colour" is totally fine... like how does that make sense. Some people try to rationalize it with that it's not offensive because it puts the word "person" first but if you ask me that's a ridiculous back-rationalization.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 01:56 PM
3	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? Personally I don't care if it results in more immigration, what does it matter? It means there are people of different skin colours walking in the street—the horror. And people who say it's about "ethnicity, not skin colour" are talking bull in general because people seem to only mind immigrants if they visibly look "different". It's simple: people have decided at one point that racism is bad so now they search for another proxy for racism without calling it racism and now they call it "ethnicit…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 01:29 PM
2	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? And what does it matter? I honestly can't really care that there are less "Dutch" than "English" people by a large margin. What would it do for me if there were more "Dutch" people? Especially if they all had to live in this already crowded country with a housing market problem. I see let the "Dutch" population go down a bit because housing is waay too expensive here right now.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 01:24 PM
3	Porn and the myth of female sexual availability Ah, you can't see that if you reply from your inbox to someone I guess.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 01:22 PM
3	Porn and the myth of female sexual availability I'm saying it's indeed quite likely that OP is reasoning from that perspective. OP seems to find the idea that some of them enjoy sex to be somewhat challenging at least.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 01:08 PM
3	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? Politicians are trying to keep the economy from becoming too top-heavy, the tax base eroding, social programs becoming unfundable, and so on. Given that people stay young and healthy for longer they could just up the retirement age. Low fertility and longer vitality are both caused by increased prosperity so you basically have your answer to lower fertility. But then you run into the problem that children can't vote and adults can eh and you want to appease the adult voter base by not increasing…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 01:06 PM
13	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? There seems to be a severe correlation between the people who are concerned with the birth rate and the people who are concerned about immigrants. If you actually make fiscal analyses it tends to be the case that they result into that a slow amount of population decline is the most beneficial to the overal economy because surprise surprise this world is overpopulated and there is a problem with certain finite resources but I don't think they want population increase to actually do something tang…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 01:00 PM
2	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? Well that goes even further into my point that the involuntary human body is trying to reproduce against the wishes of the conscious mind which is finding ways to prevent it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 12:57 PM
4	Porn and the myth of female sexual availability I'm going to say it's quite likely that OP is very frightened by the idea that some females actually enjoy sex and want it because that ruins the pretty princess image of them as rainbow beings.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 12:40 PM
4	Why do people pretend they don't know why couples don't want to be raising multiple kids? The human condition has always uniquely been that the body reproduces but the mind tries to find ways to stop this: like what other species practices ways of contraception and has since ancient times? Human beings reproducing is in many ways like their hair growing: they don't actually want to do this but their body just does it and they can't control it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 12:37 PM
1	CMV: There isn't a single significant male privilege That some people are more privileged than others based on anything other than their own relevant attributes is neither good for the collective nor fair for the individual. In the end the collective thrives most if the best man for the job is on the job and if positions are handed out for other reasons than competence at them like good looks, sex, parents with good connections and all that stuff then everyone suffers the downsides.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 11:43 AM
1	CMV: There isn't a single significant male privilege Maybe people should call it "social advantage" rather than "privilege" though but hey people love to use dramatic clickbait words to polarize and thence divide and conquer.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 11:42 AM
1	Discussion - Study shows that women, even feminists, are attracted to men who are benevolent sexists. Ah yes, I should think it's "good" that people put themselves into made-up "sexual orientation" boxes that didn't exist before the 1880s because they want to feel they belong to some group. No, I consider them fools who are far too invested in wanting to be accepted by their peers.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 11:28 AM
1	[Q4ALL] Why is it considered not manly to use skincare? And why don't more straight cis guys do it? Well, you're right about the monkey thing but this seems to phrase it as though it's a negative or "stupid" thing. It's got a "real" purpose in so far as sorting by sex or by masculine/feminine serves a real objective for the individuals concerned and society more generally. Well, let's put it like this: I just don't think this behaviour is remotely productive in reaching whatever goals one wants to reach other than the singular goal of "wanting to be like other people in your group". Whatever o…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 11:21 AM
3	Discussion - Study shows that women, even feminists, are attracted to men who are benevolent sexists. Yes, and if you knew how to logic, you wouldn't be a feminist. Since when am I a feminist? heterosexuality and homosexuality = good Where did I say this? heterosexuality and homosexuality = sexist Indeed I said this. therefore sexism must equal... Need a hint? It starts with a 'g' Even if I made the first assertion which I most assuredly did not as I believe quite the opposite it still doesn't fly and it's like one of the most elementary logical errors you can make. This is logic of the level of…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 11:18 AM
4	Discussion - Study shows that women, even feminists, are attracted to men who are benevolent sexists. Ergo all heterosexuality is a crime, as is homosexuality, No, all heterosexuality and homosexuality is sexist; sexism is not a "crime" in any jurisdiction that I know unless for employment reasons. It's like people say "You have the right to be as racist and sexist as you want in choosing your friends and lovers but that doesn't make it any less racist and sexist." I think you need to go and rework your thoughts on how this stuff works, at a pretty fundamental level you have things backwards. Th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 10:29 AM
3	Discussion - Study shows that women, even feminists, are attracted to men who are benevolent sexists. I don't think it's sexism, it's being nice. The two don't exclude each other. What makes the niceness "sexist" in this regard is that the niceness is conditioned upon someone's sex; they don't display the same niceness towards someone of a different sex. I've never seriously seen any feminist (and I used to be a gender critical radical feminist, I know my shit) say it was sexist for a man to hold the door for her or help her with lifting something heavy. You've at least seen one individual say i…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 09:34 AM
2	Discussion - Study shows that women, even feminists, are attracted to men who are benevolent sexists. Some are; some aren't. Also: Feminists say that benevolent sexism is the cause of the Patriarchy Some do; some don't. What is with this constant "$group says ..." like it's a monolithic whole with an elected spokesman who's authorized to speak on the entire group's behalf. "feminists" do not say anything. A group like "The Canadian government" says something because they have a spokesman authorized to speak on its entire behalf I find all that collectivism to be cringy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 09:32 AM
3	Q4W: Do you think that manflu is a real thing? Is that so? As far as I know females are far more likely to take sick days than males when they are sick from work at least: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/10660612/Women-are-almost-42-per-cent-more-likely-to-take-sick-days-than-men.html She said: "Presenteeism is much higher in men than women. They are much more likely to go into work while they are ill, which can have long term consequences - conditions can go undiagnosed, they not going to get early treatment. I find the idea of the …	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 09:01 AM
2	Under what conditions, if any, would you share a partner? You mean the "artificial insamination tool" that is a hand? I mean seriously, just fap, collect sperm, put it in and see if it bites.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 08:52 AM
1	What are your Valentine’s Day plans I treat it like I treat any holiday: I don't treat it at all. If I want to throw a party or have dinner with someone I can do it at any time it suits me; I have no idea how people can possibly be so daft as to seriously have dinner exactly on valentine's day when one day before or after would be suitable for them just because "You have to—even if there are no negative consequences if you don't.". I cannot comprehend the minds of people who choose to let stuff like that dictate their lives.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 08:51 AM
1	[Q4ALL] Why is it considered not manly to use skincare? And why don't more straight cis guys do it? Because girls do it a lot. So it gets girl cooties. I think it's more the opposite of "not a lot of males do it"; no one is going to stop doing things like that everyone does just because the other sex does it as well. They don't do it because their own sex doesn't often do it and people are monkeys who feel that their sex needs to do something before they can do it or something.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 08:49 AM
2	In what ways do you go out of your way to minimize being hit on, or recieving male attention in general? Nothing, I am not "hit on" or "receive male attention" or at the very least if I am I do not notice it because I'm always in thought with music on when I am outside.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 08:47 AM
1	The UK to adopt no fault divorce American posters here seem to largely hate the no fault divorce though Brits thinking that no-fault divorce is "an American thing" is like Americans thinking that universal healthcare is "a British thing"; both are the standard throughout the first world. My opinion is as always that marriage shouldn't exist as a government institution and that few reasonable parts that marriage has can already be done via contracts. The government should pull out of marriage entirely and let people call themsel…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 08:46 AM
1	The UK to adopt no fault divorce Doesn't taking abuse into consideration allow that? If it's not taken into consideration and assets are always split 50-50 it's far more objective.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 08:43 AM
1	CMV: Polyamory and/or open relationships are time consuming and not worth the effort. Whether it is time consuming has nothing to do really with poly or mono but simply how time consuming you make it and how often you meet people. I'm also rarely talking about feelings because that's just rarely how my interactions with people are. The "exception" is simply how intensive you make it and even more or less invented a term for it called "solo poly" where people don't live together with anyone and cool the intensity down a lot. Especially in the age of the internet and mobiles phones…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/19 07:30 AM
1	Incels and Mgtows are basically polar opposites, right? The ORIGINAL mgtow movement was people saying "LTRs and especially marriage does not make sense" I thought it was avoiding all intimate male-female interaction in its entirely. Not just LTRs and marriage. If it's just that then is this yet another super Americacentric thing where people act like this is some kind of revolutionary new thing because American love life is super formulaic? It's like super common where I live for people to be uninterested in LTRs and marriage and just have fun and se…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 06:27 PM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? As I said in the other reply; it's not just about socialization; it's about any one-on-one time. It's about refusing to have an evaluation with one employee whilst having it with another based on their sex; it won't fly.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 06:06 PM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Well I'm saying that this approach just does so little because accusations are in general of the form of "I want to get this specific person; how can I do that?" they set their eyes on getting you and they will find a way so it just doesn't do much. How many cases of people who have been accused of sexual improprieties had the story be about a business lunch in a restaurant? Not many right? Why? Because if you do that there are so many witnesses to the contrary; in general most of these stories …	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 05:57 PM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Sorry to fight with your hypothetical but our CCTV system would make it pretty hard for someone to claim they were alone behind closed doors with me. Okay, so they can accuse you based on something that happened outside the building. They can claim you did something when meeting them somewhere. If they want to accuse you they can accuse you in a way that it's just their word against yours and refusing dinners with them isn't going to do anything. In fact if they accuse you of such behaviour at s…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 04:43 PM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Who cares? I think the Pence rule is smart advice to avoid liability. It's not going to do much for you; you can be accused of anything no matter whether you were alone in an office with someone. For one they can just make up the claim that you were alone in an officer together and with no contravening evidence it's your word against theirs. Yeah, I think I remember learning a bit of law in school. Care to say what law I might be violating by not inviting my younger female attorneys out for drin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 04:27 PM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Yeah, and you know what humans also are: a species of repressed bisexuals. There's a reason that a lot of those males who avoid females for this reason are found to have committed infidelity with other males. If stopping infidelity is really your onus then stopping contact with anyone else is your only option.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 04:17 PM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? And again if you think the chance isn't small with your spouse you need to re-evaluate your relationship.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 03:58 PM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Or one is saying, "I wish to avoid even the appearance of impropriety". When I was still a baby lawyer, one of my partners told me that he would never meet alone with a female employee. If he needed to discipline one, for example, he would invite someone from HR or another third party to be in the room to avoid the possibility of accusations. He said he learned this when a female employee went batshit and made meritless accusations against a male attorney in the office. If it's about rape accusa…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 03:55 PM
1	Guy gets sent to jail after girl lies about being 19 yrs old. Was justice served? My analogy said: like it contained soy sauce because someone else decided to store poison in an old soy sauce flask	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 02:19 PM
1	Guy gets sent to jail after girl lies about being 19 yrs old. Was justice served? No, you absolutely couldn't if you had no reasonable way of knowing that it was poisoned. see here; criminal negligence is absolutely an element of the crime of involuntary manslaughter. Now if you put the poison there yourself and later forgot instead of a roommate without informing you that could be criminal negligence in fact a roommate putting poison that looks like soy sauce in a soy sauce flask would already be criminal neglicence on the roommate's part alone.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 01:53 PM
1	Guy gets sent to jail after girl lies about being 19 yrs old. Was justice served? Which is why I added: and there was no way you could foresee it You can still be held culpable from negligence but if there was no reasonable way you could foresee it and you were in no way negligent you're not going to get convicted. If you throw a computer out of your window and it lands on someone and it's dead then that would be negligent because you could foresee the dangers of throwing a computer out of the window. If you accidentally kill someone by putting poison in their food which just…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 01:46 PM
1	Discussion: Yes, merely asking a woman out for drinks can frequently get you accused of harassment. Yeah that's asinine; my post contained no gender and to say it contained gender because "society contains it" is basically judging me on the words of others rather than my own.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 01:34 PM
1	Guy gets sent to jail after girl lies about being 19 yrs old. Was justice served? You mean a cutoff age where you're culpable regardless of there being no reasonable way you could have known? I don't see why; if a a court finds there was no reasonable way you could've known you should always be innocent; that is how it works with every serious crime. You accidentally cause the death of 20 people but if a court rules it was unintentional and there was no way you could foresee it you go free. Anything else is just lashing out when something bad happened and trying to find someo…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 01:24 PM
1	Guy gets sent to jail after girl lies about being 19 yrs old. Was justice served? A 12 year old being believed to be 19 though is pushing it. Really depends on what the 12 year old looks like; I've seen some who look 17 and a 19 year old looking like a 17 year old is entirely credulous. Also these are all the same person demonstrating just how much makeup can do in that regard. Edit: according to another commentator ITT it appears mistaken belief is a defense in the UK but not if the victim is under 13. I think that's just absurd. Some 13 year olds definitely look like 17 or …	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 01:18 PM
3	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Because the chance is pretty small and it's no reason to limit another man's freedom and the success of the company it works for. I mean if you have joint finances and all. Any company I worked at would just replace you with someone else if you refused to have one on one meetings with the opposite sex and requested they accomodate that; they would just not have time and money for that not even considering that they would probably enjoy having a reason to fire you if you admit to having such view…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 12:46 PM
1	There is nothing more important than friendship and relationships in our current world I mean the basic answer is always gong to be "it is for some people; it isn't for others" right? Surely you agree that there are some people out there who don't care about that; hermits exist to this day who willfully seclude themselves in their house and don't come out to have any social interaction and are fine with it. So the question more becomes how common the people that value their health over social interaction are.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 12:42 PM
1	Discussion: Yes, merely asking a woman out for drinks can frequently get you accused of harassment. But the issue is gendered because society treats men and women differently, with harsher reactions to men who offend someone (or men whose actions are deemed offensive). The fact that your post isn't gendered doesn't address that. Maybe it is but you said that my post is part of the reason that males don't trust females, not that society is; there is no gender in my post. Enforcement of the law is carried out by humans and not machines. As such, while the Netherlands may have made a gender agnos…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 12:28 PM
1	Discussion: Yes, merely asking a woman out for drinks can frequently get you accused of harassment. "A nuisance at best" implies it can be considered to be worse, depending entirely on your mood. That I suppose depends on how you interpret the word "best" here. My opinion on the futility, unfairness and hazards of approaching women does not depend on you in particular. Apparently it does because you said "this is why ..." reflecting on my post and starting to become gendered. There is no gender in my post. And this issue is quite gendered. Maybe it is but not due to my post. You don't see men …	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 11:47 AM
1	Discussion: Yes, merely asking a woman out for drinks can frequently get you accused of harassment. Harassment, and accusations thereof, is literally the explicitly mentioned point of this thread. It defines the context of all conversations therein. And I was clear in my post that I considered it a "nuisance" and not harassment: I emphasized the word "nuisance" for a good reason. How is a man to know beforehand whether striking up a social conversation with a woman is considered a nuisance by her? Of course PPD doctrine says men should just accept this as an inevitable risk. I call utter and a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 11:15 AM
1	Discussion: Yes, merely asking a woman out for drinks can frequently get you accused of harassment. That's a far cry from saying you'd accuse someone of harassment if they asked you out for a drink. The word I used was "nuisance"; I consider people a nuisance when they approach me out of no-where. "sexual harassment" is a legal term that translates poorly between jurisdictions. Where I live legally speaking making a sexual proposition to a stranger no prior good faith belief that they might be reciprocal (having a prior flirty conversation or whatever already counts) is legally considered "ove…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 10:33 AM
1	Discussion: Yes, merely asking a woman out for drinks can frequently get you accused of harassment. I'm pretty sure you're going to get the same response if you ask the average male from around here and as I said the sex doesn't matter. What do you even mean with "trust" here? They need to trust me to give them permission to invade my time or something? I'm sorry but I don't owe strangers my time. Now of course if I aroused the impression that I'm in a mood to talk by exchanging friendly looks and I don't then the fault is all mine but if I'm just sitting somewhere reading a book or walking ar…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 10:16 AM
1	Discussion: Yes, merely asking a woman out for drinks can frequently get you accused of harassment. It is harassment when it comes from unwanted males I kind of feel that if you ask a female to answer a hypothetical of a male sexually approaching the former in its mind it imagines the male to be less attractive than the average. Conversely if you ask a male the same thing in reverse in its mind it imagines the female to be more attractive than the average.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 10:07 AM
1	Discussion: Yes, merely asking a woman out for drinks can frequently get you accused of harassment. I mean why is that wrong or a bad thing? I consider any stranger who starts a social conversation with me with no prior indication that I am receptive to be a nuisance at best. This topic seems to be written from the perspective that this opinion is bad.I find the French number to be awfully low; if you asked this where I live the number would be up way higher. I don't need strangers—of either sex—come up to me and try to have a social conversation without having some form of business; I'm compl…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 10:06 AM
1	How much money would I have to pay you to switch your gender? Depends on if I get to know what the end result will be beforehand and whether I like it. I'm more concerned with whether I like what I see than the sex. If I don't get to know what it will look like at all except for "a male body" I would probably take the risk for free. As male bodies are statistically stronger and faster than my current body as well as more efficient at urination I guess the expectancy value would be that it's beneficial minus the cost of conversion and having to explain to p…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 09:01 AM
7	Guy gets sent to jail after girl lies about being 19 yrs old. Was justice served? Sadly there are no pictures of her to be found so we might have to go with "justice has been served". You know there is such a thing as just not coming to conclusions when there is insufficient evidence. I reserve my judgement until I know what this individual looks and acts like. I've absolutely seen some pictures and videos of people who are like 12 or 13 but can convincingly pass as 16-17 or something and someone who looks 16 years old and enough people who are 19 look 16-17 so if someone who…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 08:54 AM
21	Guy gets sent to jail after girl lies about being 19 yrs old. Was justice served? I reserve judgement until I see what the 12 year old looks like. Like you sometimes encounter people who look really old or young for their age. Where I live an element of the crime is reasonable suspicion that someone was below certain ages. You have no obligation yourself to ask or check for ID if someone claims they are the right age and from looking at them you have no reason to doubt it. This was recently used to acquit someone who slept with a 12 year old whom it met in a nightclub that wa…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 08:51 AM
3	What are some things you wish men understood about women/the female experience? That there is no "the female experience". And I wished females understood that too because at times it feels like they understand it even less. You know the whole "whatever I experience is 'the female experience' because I happen to be female." You can—of course—freely swap the sexes and my point remains.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 04:37 AM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? And you talk about ignoring. No what I'm saying is that the no-opposite-sex rule is clearly quite useless in that. Apart from that the Mike Pence rules applies to business lunches; like a restaurant with other people? Yeah people are sure going to rape people in a restaurant with people watching. It is not and has never been about "rape"; it's about jealous spouses.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 04:35 AM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Or you can choose a same-sex doctor and lawyer. And that choice is the client's, not the lawyer's or doctor's. You're absolutely going to be looking for another job if you have a hard rule as a lawyer, doctor, therapist, or clergyman to not meet with people of the opposite sex in one-on-one settings because that choice is theirs, not yours, and often it's not theirs at all due to availability. You simply can't perform your job if you have that rule. Clergymen are not socially important in the le…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 04:25 AM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Beats me, never had it either but some people on reddit told me that some companies they work for actually have these rules. Like someone complained about being the leader of a team but someone else on the team had to go to the boss's office to discuss some things who was way less qualified for it because of this rule.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 04:16 AM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? It'll be a nightmare when you get rape-accused into not having a career anymore too. Your loss (though in that case, you can just keep the door open too) Yeah and not a single rape accusation ever occurred at that company. This isn't the US where they fly around everywhere and newspapers are allowed to publish identifiable data of suspects and a giant court of public opinion happens everywhere. Uh, your family can sit in on half of those. If the client allows it which is the choice of the client…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 03:55 AM
2	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? You have someone else in the room. Literally nothing is important enough that you only have a one-on-one meeting. Well that is how world leaders converse on state visists; they have a lot of private talks. That is how a lot of business lunches occur; that is how by design evaluations of performance occur: two people in a room. If you can't do that a significant portion of your staff you're unfit for your job. The media was giving Trump shit recently for having a one-on-one meeting with Putin, wi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 03:46 AM
3	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Obviously because you need to be able to have one on one meetings with other people as part of your job and some of those people will be opposite sex. How well would Angela Merkel be doing its job if it can't have one-on-one conversations with like 95% of world leaders and Trump's job would be done even worse than now if it couldn't have one-on-one conversations with May or Merkel. You act like t here's not a serious cost to "not tempting anything"; you have a job to do and an obligation to whoe…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 03:34 AM
4	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Yeah I can see people in top executive positions of companies already fly the argument of "Sorry, my irrational girlfriend comes before the interests of the company."— I'm sure they can find someone else.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 03:31 AM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? Apparently a lot of companies actually practice rules against this—no two persons of opposite sex can be alone in one room together which leads to a lot of logistic wrangling of course.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 03:23 AM
1	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? What makes more sense is to just I don't know practice restraint and don't cheat on your spouse regardless on how attractive whoever you're having business lunches is to you? But I don't think it's really about an actual threat of infidelity. There's a lot of sex segregation going on that people justify with all sorts of heteronormative reproduction arguments but I think the reality is just that people want sex segregation for its own sake and just have grown up with a lot of sex segregation and…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 03:22 AM
7	Thoughts on the "Mike Pence" rule? I mean by doing so you're basically saying one of two things: "I have no self control so I avoid the temptation altogether" "My spouse—accurately or not—thinks I have no self control and I indulge that." But who knows, maybe you don't have self control and this is the best solution for you; my problem is that you're hurting other people's career opportunities with it and excluding them and making your problem their problem.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/19 03:16 AM