| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | At least half the comments here are rageface worthy. Yahoo! Shine - "What would you do if it were illegal to circumcise your son?"I'm from Vietnam. Circumcision is about as common as some one born with 6 fingers on one hand. I live in America now, and I thought it was a strange practice but never really thought about it much before I started reading last night. It seems like a mean thing to do to people for no reason. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/11 05:48 PM |
| 2 | At least half the comments here are rageface worthy. Yahoo! Shine - "What would you do if it were illegal to circumcise your son?"I did read about some issues where circumcision can be a corrective option, like phimosis. But even the medical sites explain you will not be able to know if a boy has phimosis until at least age 5. I guess the parts that confuse me the most is the small amount of opposition to the practice against the very small need for it. I mean, I guess you do not "need" a foreskin, but you also do not "need" it removed. We do not "need" our appendix either, but we do not go around removing them from people… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/11 05:45 PM |
| 2 | At least half the comments here are rageface worthy. Yahoo! Shine - "What would you do if it were illegal to circumcise your son?"I read two articles about him today. I'm not sure how to describe him. Crazy wouldn't be right, but maybe extremist is the right word? It sounds like he was influenced by other doctors and religion to promote it and that he had more influence on culture than even he understood. It is a strange practice that should stop (unless of course an adult man wants to have it done.) | /r/MensRights | 17/06/11 05:34 PM |
| 4 | At least half the comments here are rageface worthy. Yahoo! Shine - "What would you do if it were illegal to circumcise your son?"I've tried to find some articles about it tonight. The only religious reasons I found were related to Judaism and Islam. The medical sites only told me that the benefits/risks were basically a push. I don't remember seeing anything about Victorian influence, but that would make sense from what I read about where it's a common practice. What I didn't find was anything that said why it's common (other than your reply.) It just doesn't make much sense to me. If the benefit/risk is just a push, why … | /r/MensRights | 17/06/11 07:40 AM |
| 4 | At least half the comments here are rageface worthy. Yahoo! Shine - "What would you do if it were illegal to circumcise your son?"I'm a woman. I don't know enough about circumcision to be pro or against, but I prefer the caution of against just because it doesn't sound like a good idea to cut off parts of a body that are supposed to be there. Where I'm from, it isn't common. Where I live, it is. Is there some significant event in America, or the west, that made this popular? | /r/MensRights | 17/06/11 05:25 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter