TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

w1g2 Archive

View 28 posts and 905 comments by w1g2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
431

Legal Rightsw1g2/r/MensRights28/06/19 04:52 PM
139

False Accusationw1g2/r/MensRights03/10/18 03:02 AM
123

Generalw1g2/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:08 PM
91

Social Issuesw1g2/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:57 PM
85

Intactivismw1g2/r/MensRights29/07/19 06:47 PM
76

Discriminationw1g2/r/MensRights16/09/19 03:08 AM
61

Social Issuesw1g2/r/MensRights24/12/17 06:23 AM
55

Social Issuesw1g2/r/MensRights10/09/17 05:15 AM
40

Feminismw1g2/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:29 AM
40

Humourw1g2/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:35 PM
39

Feminismw1g2/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:55 PM
34

Marriage/Childrenw1g2/r/MensRights02/01/18 05:58 AM
30

Legal Rightsw1g2/r/MensRights14/11/18 05:34 PM
30

Feminismw1g2/r/MensRights23/06/19 04:45 AM
26

Discriminationw1g2/r/MensRights18/11/17 06:02 AM
24

Social Issuesw1g2/r/MensRights28/07/19 07:06 PM
22

Feminismw1g2/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:54 AM
22

Social Issuesw1g2/r/MensRights06/01/18 04:37 AM
17

Progressw1g2/r/MensRights16/12/18 01:50 AM
14

Feminismw1g2/r/MensRights24/06/19 06:27 PM
12

Legal Rightsw1g2/r/MensRights30/03/19 05:33 AM
11

Edu./Occu.w1g2/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:19 PM
10

Edu./Occu.w1g2/r/MensRights16/09/21 07:58 PM
7

Social Issuesw1g2/r/MensRights11/03/20 03:11 AM
7

discussionw1g2/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/21 02:16 AM
6

Social Issuesw1g2/r/MensRights08/02/18 08:35 PM
6

Marriage/Childrenw1g2/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:37 AM
1

Social Issuesw1g2/r/MensRights10/07/20 03:50 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Female villain not portrayed as a victim and a male protagonist portrayed sympathetically despite being imperfect: The Crucible Pro-male movies: Sing Street Captain Fantastic
/r/MensRights20/07/22 03:16 AM
13

It was feminist Mary P. Koss who influenced our current laws on rape and she has explicitly stated that she crafted them in such a way as to exclude men from rape by women in the expected way: "“Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders. It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman. p. 206”…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:41 AM
7

I wish she could talk to more managers.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:39 AM
8

I like listening to country music for nostalgia's sake because I grew up in the country, but it's hard listening to all of the gynocentric crap in it. Any Man of Mine by Shania Twain is particularly annoying. "I can be late for a date, that's fine, but he better be on time." People like to believe these are some of the last bastions of traditional values and respecting men, but they've been influenced by feminism just as long.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:28 PM
1

"There are also like endless stories of women falling for imperfect men. Funny how most of the women's fantasy seems to focus on who the guy is as a person, how he acts and how he treats others, how he makes a woman feel, and men's materials are focused on body types. Christ, you put it right there, the "variety" has only to do with body type. Like, I personally like to give men more credit than you're giving them right now because I feel like a good number of them deserve it... It's almost like…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:22 AM
1

I'm a woman, thought it would be clear from my avatar. How many women consider it a gift to men to allow them to have sex with them? Sex is way better when both people care about the other's pleasure, but you aren't always going to find that in casual sex partners. You may want to, but that doesn't mean you will. It's like expecting that every stranger you talk to will be as interested in asking questions about you as they are about talking about themselves. The more people you try this with, th…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:40 PM
3

There's a romance genre for women now called Big Beautiful Women, which involves a heavier female protagonist. Interestingly enough, she always gets involved with physically perfect men, and there are no categories for Big Beautiful Men because I guess women don't want to fantasize about that (also no categories for short men, medium sized men, thin men, bald men, etc.). Popular categories are things like: billionaire, criminals, doctor, fire fighter, vampires, and otherworldly creatures. In com…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:15 PM
2

They're getting what they want out of the transaction. It's not their obligation to make sure that every sexual encounter is fulfilling everything that the other partner wants, especially when their partner is a stranger they met in the club or merely an ongoing no-strings attached situation. Just like you as a woman probably don't think to yourself "gee, I hope I made that as pleasurable as possible for him"; you're mostly concerned with your own pleasure and how satisfied you were. Turns out h…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:47 PM
10

Ah yes, it's only recently that women have preferred and made known their preference for tall, rich, muscled, powerful men with wide shoulders and slim hips. For some reason, men can be either "breast, butt, or legs" men yet you don't find women grouping themselves by "chest, hips, or biceps" women. Not because they don't care about it, judging by the covers and pages of every romance novel ever written, but because women all tend to agree the ideal guy should have it all: perfectly muscled tall…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:51 AM
8

Perhaps the onus of sexual satisfaction should not be placed solely on men and their ability to "know how to use their equipment".
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:20 AM
1

You know what hypocrisy I hate the most? If a man says or does something a woman doesn't like, she has the social right to hit, slap, kick him, whatever she wants. The idea behind this is that she needs to scare him, show him that she's strong enough to hurt him so that he knows to back off. Yet we also believe that men are not allowed to hurt women in any way, not even to retaliate violence done to them, because women are so much weaker than men so men cannot risk hurting them without the possi…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:22 PM
1

A pregnancy is not comparable to one person causing a car accident, it is comparable to two persons causing an accident. Their insurance companies will most definitely investigate if one person is more at fault than the other, particularly if one person received physical damage to their person. If the physically damaged person was more at fault for the accident, they will have to pay for the damage to themselves, their car, and the other person's car. If a person sets things up to have someone c…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:57 PM
2

Men also are unlikely to have consented to a woman becoming pregnant. Both parties engage in the sexual act knowing that pregnancy is a possible outcome. There is no logical reasoning that suggests a man having sex with a woman makes him responsible for the outcome of pregnancy and that she bears no responsibility. You said sperm causes pregnancy, but sperm alone does not cause pregnancy, it can only happen when sperm meets egg. So therefore the woman shares half responsibility for making her eg…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 03:10 AM
11

With women, it is also about who it's coming from. If the man is considered attractive by the woman, she will not only accept behavior that would otherwise be considered harassment/assault, she will like it. She will like that the guy was confident enough to do it, that this places him in the light of a bad boy for crossing societal platitudes, and that she'd like to think he would do it because he wants her that badly. Meanwhile, a guy she doesn't find attractive merely staring at her for too l…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:00 AM
18

I would question this because even those richest and most powerful of men still get taken to the cleaners in divorce court (Jeff Bezos for example). You would think with all of the power they have, they could use it to get a better deal when getting divorced.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 10:21 PM
8

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/ojzy29/never_a_fight_of_woman_against_man_what_textbooks/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:28 PM
6

Don't forget that women's suffrage in America began in the territories in 1869 and by the time 1920 rolled around, the only states that didn't allow female suffrage were in the south and east coast.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:05 PM
3

Women were treated as weak childlike, and less than men. The idea of being seen as weak and dependent is treated as an oppressive concept. But being seen as needing help, as being incapable of doing things all on your own is what often gets you sympathy and protection. They were also particularly seen as holy, angelic, morally superior to men (which certainly is still egged on by feminism today despite a complete lack of classy behavior from women). Yes of course you can find some criticisms of …
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:19 AM
2

I'll be perfectly candid and say that I've generally seen a lot more appreciation from men directed towards women than from women directed towards men This is just another anecdote, but on every Facebook group that I am a part of, whether it's about hair care or homeschooling, every time a woman mentions her male partner disagreeing in the slightest a choice she made or an opinion she has, everyone chimes in to tell her that he is abusive and she needs to divorce him immediately. This is sometim…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 01:56 AM
2

Everybody and their mother freaks out over the passage in the Bible which tells women to obey their husbands as an example of the "disrespect" of women, but nobody mentions the passage which goes "Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her" which is a very blatant call for men to sacrifice for their wives. There is an increasingly common event taking place in a christian wedding ceremonies where the bride sits in a chair and the husband kneels down to wash …
/r/MensRights01/10/21 01:48 AM
2

I lived during a time when men were NOT called out for sexual harassment (mild) to any meaningful degree. the modern feminists movement is going WAY overboard with the "all men" agenda. I'm just guessing this was during the sexual revolution or slightly afterward. Before then, men certainly had extremely strict rules about how they conducted themselves around women. Seriously, there was an expectation that you would get punched by another man just for swearing in front of a woman. But the sexual…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 01:34 AM
2

"Women are expected to give up their hard-earned money to these lazy men It's funny because this is another point that illustrates the aforementioned attitude most women have about men- that if a man isn't living up to a woman's expectations it's because he's lazy. When women are behind, that can only mean oppression (so society must help them!) and when men are behind it can only be because men are selfish and lazy (so they need to help themselves). That's really expecting men to be superheroes…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 09:39 PM
2

It's honestly sad how much women can control the narrative about themselves in different scenarios. We constantly see depictions in movies of female fighters, usually a mere 100 pounds, beating up truckloads of men with a single kick of their leg, and in that moment we're wholly on board with the idea that women are oh so strong and powerful. And this then informs our belief about women in the army or as firefighters- of course she can be just as strong as any man. But then the second a woman sa…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 01:32 AM
2

It's a very good demonstration of how women wield power in a "patriarchy", or how women desire to wield power in any society. "I'm just so weak, but of course I shouldn't be, you're the one making me weak, therefore you have to do everything to make me strong."
/r/MensRights18/09/21 12:50 PM
1

Multiple paternity has a lot less benefits than assumed monogamy. Maybe Fred is willing to give Suzy some extra berries because he thinks some of her kids might be his, but he's not going to do as much as he would if he felt quite certain that her kids are his. If we consider how covert ovulation originally would have occurred, I think it's easy to see it as the basis for monogamous pair bonding. Long ago a female happens to be born with covert ovulation instead of overt. This makes her complete…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/21 11:06 PM
1

I certainly agree, it's easy to see in modern culture, particularly in the way that it is steadily increasing. When I was growing up, no girl ever wore fake eyelashes during the day, maybe a few would wear it to a night club. Now it's something that most girls/women wear everyday. Many would like to claim that it comes solely from pressure from men, that if men didn't like that kind of thing, women wouldn't do it. However, many of those things men do dislike- wearing too much make up, dressing t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/21 10:20 PM
5

Something interesting I've noticed about the differences between men and women and their views of romance is that men are able to separate sexuality from romance and women are not, and also that men have realistic, equality-minded expectations for their relationships and women do not. My reason for thinking this is that men's preferred porn solely focuses on sex and contains no romantic elements. Men do enjoy portrayals of romantic relationships in their own books and movies, and certainly they …
/r/MalePsychology22/06/21 09:18 PM
3

In regards to the "feminism is just about equality" argument, I certainly can't say this will work, but it's a counter argument that I've been working on: Imagine I go up to a group of feminists and say, "I'm a feminist and I believe in equality!" What would they do? Cheer and clap me on the back and say, "That's all it's about!" But if I go on to say, "And I believe that equality has been achieved and women are equal to men." [As an MRA, I of course do not believe equality has been achieved, so…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/21 02:34 AM
4

Feminists have a really schizophrenic relationship with female power and agency: on the one hand it is celebrated, on the other it is denied... Feminists love to oscillate between the two depending on which perception of women is most convenient. They oscillate between the two depending on which gets them the most power: agentic power and hypoagentic power. Presenting oneself as oh so strong and powerful is great when you want to take power for yourself, and presenting oneself as oh so downtrodd…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/20 04:14 AM
7

even that makes people uncomfortable because it feels like a negative judgment against women who had children outside of committed relationships, We're at a point in society where you can't say anything that portrays women in a less than positive light, the only exception being if you explain a negative behavior of women as merely the result of their being a victim of the patriarchy. So you can talk about single motherhood being bad if the intent of the conversation is to portray the situation a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 03:45 PM
2

Feminism's cling to patriarchy theory is in itself an exertion of power which is why they will never abandon it no matter how much evidence you provide against it. Being able to cast yourself as a victim in any situation and someone else as solely responsible for his actions, your actions, and the things you did together, and to have everyone agree with you, is an immense power to wield especially when applied to an entire society. And, worst of all, most feminists aren't acting out of a deliber…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/20 12:50 PM
5

Some points to contradict from the article: 1. The article describes incels as being perpetrators of violence, rather than victims of it. This is not true as men on the whole receive far more violence. Anyone who has been through school knows that lower-rung males are the ones to receive the most violence as well as social ostracism. Girls are bullied usually through gossip, heckling, and other verbal manipulation, but boys receive this as well as physical violence (due to our viewing men as vio…
/r/MensRights10/07/20 04:36 PM
4

Women also have a strong ability to create or endorse accepted norms because of our greater sensitivity to female safety and our bioligical disgust for lower-status males. Women have a very large influence over what's the socially aceptable way to "treat a lady", how to "treat a woman with respect", be sensitive to "women's issues", etc. Basically, society conforms a lot to what women want, not the other way around. The changes we see in social norms stem from women collectively changing their m…
/r/MensRights04/06/20 08:43 PM
1

I debated that for a long time too, and have ultimately decided to just use my voice with images of whatever I'm referencing. Anything more would just be too personal for me, at least for the time being. I'm pretty slow at it, but I'll be sure to link them here when I've got some finished.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 02:53 AM
3

I feel the same way, which is why I'm focusing on creating videos to lay out my arguments and hopefully reach a larger audience. Because I just can't keep debating the same stuff over and over with people who aren't actually interested in listening to another point of view.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 03:22 AM
3

"Good luck finding a feminist who really thinks we should believe all women..." Good luck finding a feminist who disagrees with the oft-stated platitude that only 2% of rape accusations are false therefore 98% of rape accusations are true... ergo believe 98% of women.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 10:57 PM
3

This would select for males who did these things. This is an excellent way to put it. You made a great point about neoteny too. There's an interesting trend I notice with neotenous males in that in a non-sexual context, they are able to tap into the power of their neoteny like women are. So, for the movie franchises of Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter, neotenous male actors were selected to play the innocent main characters because it would contribute to our belief that they are inherently goo…
/r/MensRights26/04/20 02:24 PM
5

I grew up in the LDS church (Mormon) which is seen by outsiders as inherently misogynistic. Women in the church cannot hold the priesthood which prevents them from inhabiting roles of authority such as prophet, apostle, patriarch, or bishop. The church also promotes the idea that men should be the head of the household and women should stay at home and take care of the children. So there are a lot of parallels between Muslim culture and Mormon culture. The majority of women in the church do not …
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:20 AM
2

Yes, I meant to leave a comment on that about my experience with modern traditionally-minded cultures and the misrepresentation of them as misogynistic. I'll get to it tonight.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 02:55 PM
5

I enjoyed her ability to assess the hypocrisy in her initial disgust at male sexual fantasies and her sympathy towards men. She is, however, still too much of a believer in the idea that men and women act differently solely because of social constructs placed on them. For example, she talks about women being passive in sex, expecting men to be able to give them orgasms because they are taught to depend on men, men must be the one to unlock their sexuality, etc. This was written in the 1980s and …
/r/MensRights21/04/20 02:19 AM
2

Yes this is what I particularly don't understand about patriarchy theory- the idea that gender roles were socially constructed and are therefore completely unnatural... yet they were somehow perpetuated across the globe in just about every civilization for thousands of years. Feminists are also fond of the idea of a completely egalitarian society before agriculture came about... so why did men suddenly become misogynistic and oppressive with the invention of agriculture? Why were they oh so egal…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 02:20 AM
5

What do feminists mean by equality, though? For many people, equality just means women having the same legal rights as men (men having the same legal rights as women is another story). But feminism is focused on the idea that men and women must be exactly the same. When they say they advocate for the political equality of men and women, they increasingly mean that 50% of politicians must be female. When they say they advocate for economic equality, they mean 50% of CEOs and other top jobs must b…
/r/MensRights17/04/20 04:46 PM
3

Here is a timeline of women's higher education. The first woman to graduate from a university was in the 1200s in Italy. Here is a timeline of women's education in the U.S. "In Colonial America elementary education was widespread in New England, but limited elsewhere. New England Puritans believed it was necessary to study the Bible, so boys and girls were taught to read at an early age. By 1750, nearly 90% of New England's women and almost all of its men could read and write. Tax-supported scho…
/r/MensRights13/04/20 03:06 AM
6

Our ideas of what oppression is, especially in reference to women, concerns things like being seen as weak and dependent, not owning land, not having access to education, not having the ability to work outside the home, etc. It is also based on the idea that when restrictions are placed on women, they could only come about from oppressive, misogynistic men and do not represent what women want. Many of these are coming from a modern perspective. Formal education has only been more easily accessib…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 05:40 PM
3

Here's a talk given by Amy Schumer In it, she describes an encounter between herself and a guy who she admits didnt really want to have sex with her and was so drunk that he kept falling asleep during their sexual acts. If this was a man talking about doing the same things to a drunk woman, it would be considered rape and his career would be ruined. I mean, Louis C. K. asked women for their consent and got it before he masturbated in front of them, yet because they might have felt the slightest …
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:44 PM
2

We talk about how women are expected to put on makeup and get boob jobs to make themselves into barbies, but most men really don't care about makeup and think it's stupid or just appreciate makeup when it IS worn because it shows their partner put some effort into their appearance for them and most men would rather have the real deal rather than silicone anyways Women can't accept that there are positives and negatives to every choice. Women get to wear make up to enhance their appearance, somet…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:25 PM
3

When I was at my most attractive, I received far less "harassment" or advances from men because they didn't think they had a chance, I suppose. I did get attention from the more attractive guys, so I didnt mind. When I was more average attractiveness, I got more attention and advances from more men, but these men were, at least I considered at the time, less attractive than me so I didn't like the attention. Women have very high standards when it comes to what they consider to be physically attr…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:05 PM
2

From a biological point of view, women provide humanity things men absolutely cannot: pregnancy, birthing, breastfeeding. Men provide humanity things women largely cannot: their own disposability, protection, strength, etc. It can still be useful for a woman to be strong, brave, wanting to protect others. We only approve of this if she doesn't die or get seriously hurt, so female representation as super heroes or ass-kicking strong independent women in movies is acceptable, as well as letting wo…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 01:57 PM
1

I'm going to guess that if all men around the world said the women around them were terrible people, the reaction would not be, "Hmm, they must be right."
/r/MensRights29/03/20 07:19 PM
2

Although I would agree that patriarchal tendencies are not solely the result of gynocentric instincts, I believe they are a result of natural differences in the nature of men and women, as well as the difference in requirements made by the sexes for mate pairing. I do not believe that patriarchy is the result of men wanting to subordinate women or social attitudes that keep women from achieving positions of authority. Women are less likely to desire a top leadership position in any field because…
/r/MensRights28/03/20 03:55 AM
6

Great sources and wonderful research.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 02:42 AM
16

I'm not saying this is proof that his claim is true, it's just not proof that it is false. Yes I know.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 07:51 PM
18

It's common for domestic violence victims to claim their injuries came from an accident, like "I fell down some stairs, I'm so clumsy." A man in a domestic violence situation isn't likely to text his doctor, "my wife cut off the tip of my middle finger." I'm not saying this is proof that his claim is true, it's just not proof that it is false. A recorded confession between the two with him stating he cut his finger would be far more likely proof.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 07:43 PM
1

Ah thank you for the detailed reply, those are very useful links and it gives a far broader picture of trends than a handful of cases.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 03:11 AM
3

I'll preface this by saying I doubt any of the examples I share will matter to the person you argued with, but I'll share anyway. You already gave her the example of Matheolus, who chronicled being forced to have sex with his wife despite his unwillingness to do so, and how when he finally refused, he was physically punished for it by the law. Can anyone possibly imagine a wife, past or present, in the same situation and not regard that as rape? But it sounds like she wants an example of a woman…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 03:45 AM
3

That's what's funniest about her assertion that her love life would be less criticized if she were a a man. As a man, she would be seen as a misogynistic womanizer for constantly dating so many high-profile women and she would certainly not be able to write songs about said relationships from the perspective of "you were an egotistical jerk and never deserved me".
/r/MensRights29/02/20 03:23 PM
3

I suspect. Perhaps part of the reason the female protagonists look so terribly bad is that we are not used to such blatant aggression/violence from women - we have little cultural conditioning to understand it. In the vast majority of movies and television created today, you'll see innumerable examples of women being violent to men. We tend to automatically view it as deserved for the smallest of reasons, he said something she didn't like or he looked at her the wrong way. If it's not seen as de…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 09:32 PM
1

Fascinating, and astounding job on your research. It's so refreshing to see the truth of history rather than the lies we've been told and which we have to argue against ad nauseam.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 01:07 AM
1

Yeah I'm pretty sure American feminists of the first and second waves insisted that all they wanted was equality, no special privileges or treatment... then asking for special treatment and insisting it was equality.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:52 AM
1

Oh I meant this picture not the one about Judge Thumb. Most pictures from the time period depict men hitting their wives in a negative light, such as this and this. But it's shown with their hand, not a stick. The one with the stick seems to be neutral, but that could be my interpretation. Your analysis indicates that, at the very least, what Guilielino did to his wife was considered unlawful. He personally may have thought that his behavior was normal, but that doesn't necessarily imply that it…
/r/MensRights12/02/20 10:38 PM
2

No problem and thanks for the new information and for reading my blogpost since it is quite lengthy. I haven't checked the direct sources from the 14th century court case I mention in it (As Men Do With Their Wives) but it does seem to imply that men had the right to physically chastise wives with belts or switch, in the same way as with servants and children (as Blackstone states). There is also included in the blog a picture from the medieval period of a man smacking his wife's bottom with a s…
/r/MensRights12/02/20 05:00 AM
14

My research has yielded similar results, which I wrote about here.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 08:49 PM
1

I'd like to see people choosing whatever works best for them. I think it's possible to find balance with any arrangement, but considerations of differences do need to be taken into account. Even if both partners work a job, does one of the jobs come with more pressure or is physically more arduous? If one partner earns more money which greatly benefits the family, shouldn't that factor into expectations of chorework, childcare, etc? For example, if I was a high-earning lawyer and my husband work…
/r/MensRights11/02/20 05:54 PM
11

Being the partner who works can be seen as being the servant to the person who doesn't.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 01:16 PM
5

Women do not need formal power to have their needs taken into consideration by society. Children do not hold positions of formal power, but that does not mean society oppresses them and doesn't care about their wellbeing or needs. (84% of working women in a 2012 study from Forbes said they aspire to be a stay-at-home mother)[https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/09/12/is-opting-out-the-new-american-dream-for-working-women/amp/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:25 PM
2

The idea that fathers need to start out with less custody in a divorce because they weren't the ones packing lunches or giving baths most of the time is ridiculous. These things are easily learned. I could easily write out a schedule and things to remember for a babysitter who's never watched my kids before and reasonably expect them to perform them. Having men more involved in parenting would in general be a win for everyone. Not everyone wants roles exactly the same, and for most people it's n…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 08:34 PM
1

The premise seems to come to an incorrect conclusion. There are very few countries where there are more men than women in total according to this graph, and althoughmost of those countries hold traditional values, they are not the only places where traditional values are widely held. And if we assume that the prevalence of the male gender subordinates women, we would have to assume that this comes from older adult males. If you look at countries with more adult males (aged 25-54), you don't alwa…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 04:01 AM
3

I would not say that countries with higher female populations are more flexible, they are centered around what females want. In Western socities, casual sex is okay if the woman wanted it to be casual. If the guy wanted it to be casual but the woman wanted something more, he's supposed to be a heartless womanizer who treated her like a sexual object. If a woman deliberately chooses to be a single mother either by a sperm donor or impregnating herself with an unknowing man, she's supposed to be a…
/r/MensRights09/02/20 09:25 PM
2

Believe Women Standard: it was rape if a woman felt it was, regardless of any actions the man did or did not do.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 10:28 PM
8

I always noted amongst female groups when growing up that they would try to one up each other about bad experiences and victim status. Men try to one up each other with accomplishments, obviously sometimes made up, but with women it's about victimization. Ask a group of mothers about their birthing experiences and they'll start competing with each other over whose was the most horrific. Same with rape, sexual assault. That's not to say that the stories would be completely made up, but most embel…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:47 AM
1

Mandatory and preferred arrest policies and predominant aggressor policies are insanely biased in favor of women. "Dual arrest was more common in intimate partner cases if the primary offender was female and/or 21 or older" and "dual arrest rates decreased when: The primary offender was male (60 percent less likely)." So when the perceived primary offender was male, only he would go to jail, but when the perceived primary offender was female, both she and her male partner would go to jail. " In …
/r/MensRights03/02/20 04:33 PM
3

I witness a lot of the conversations my husband has talking with his friends as he plays computer games. Granted, when I am around that might make it so that he doesnt get to open up about his problems, but he often continues to play after I go to bed so he gets his chance then. I find that they often open up about their problems to each other, all while also engaging in all of the smack talk and crude joking that goes on between men (and usually acts as a prelude to more serious talk). I dont t…
/r/MensRights01/02/20 03:44 PM
2

>Indeed if the situation were reversed and she were a male instead of female, her selfsame actions would be exalted and put on a pedestal. Yes because society totally applauds men who go from relationship to relationship quickly or having no-strings attached sex with countless women. Those men totally aren't considered jerks, cads, and womanizers who objectify women and are heartless for having only wanted sex from a woman when she might have wanted more. This is another example of solipsism. Wo…
/r/MensRights01/02/20 03:23 PM
6

Wouldn't men having their own spaces where they can tell their dirty jokes and engage in roughhousing and crude behavior with other men allow them to have emotional openness with each other? Because they can't behave in those ways amongst women who are offended by such behaviors, and must otherwise act in ways that conform to women's ideals of men, therefore they never have a chance to let down their guard? Isn't that what Norah Vincent discovered about traditional male bowling groups when she w…
/r/MensRights01/02/20 01:35 PM
1

Although I certainly didn't see evidence that men practically never go to jail for spousal abuse, a reason why men are arrested but may not get convicted is because of mandatory and preferred arrest policies. "Arrest rates in intimate partner cases were 97 percent higher in states with mandatory arrest laws, compared to states with discretionary arrest laws. Arrest rates in intimate partner cases were 177 percent higher in states with preferred arrest laws, compared to states with discretionary …
/r/MensRights30/01/20 08:51 PM
3

You could get it in under the guise of using it to discriminate against non-feminists, but in reality use it for the opposite purpose.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 01:49 PM
21

Many of the oscar nominated movies this year are movies that portrayed masculinity, even the so-called "toxic" traits, in a positive or sympathetic light, like Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, Joker, 1917, and Ford vs Ferrari. Much to the furor of feminists and the mainstream media. Considering how woke Hollywood has been in the past, I see this as a real sign of progress.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 01:19 AM
1

This article is based on over 1500 instances of marital conflict collected from three main sources: litigation concerning marriage that came before Durham, York and Oxford ecclesiastical courts; cases of wife-beating, desertion and separation dealt with by the courts of quarter sessions in Northumberland, Newcastle, Durham, North Yorkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire; and advertisements placed by husbands in Newcastle, York and Oxford newspapers, in which they refused to pay their wives’ de…
/r/MensRights26/01/20 11:06 PM
2

You mentioned that sometimes baby girls are left to die because they are unwanted by families and this represents misogyny in cultures. Is every civilization since the dawn of time not deeply misandric because it expects men and only men to die in war? Older men were placed with young girls because such men could financially support a family. Young girls were sometimes married as soon as they became capable of pregnancy so as to avoid getting pregnant while unmarried and therefore unsure of who …
/r/MensRights26/01/20 08:41 PM
2

The fact that so many claims had to be made by wives in courts of law suggests that many men took this law rather lightly. The study covered court complaints over a period of a 140 years (1660-1800) and 78 complaints (21%) during that time were made from wives about their husbands not maintaining them properly. That's slightly more than 1 complaint every two years. The study also mentions that "10 per cent of the secondary complaints in the records of marital difficulties were made by husbands a…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 06:01 PM
6

"What man would consent to such work?" I couldn't believe when stentorian46 made that comment, as if it was the refusal of men that forced women, who were just so much hardier, to take on the work of pushing coal carts. Men take on the majority of dangerous hard labor in the world because women refuse to do it. In natural disasters or crises, it's a majority of men risking their lives without pay to rescue others, frequently women. Even in households, it's men who will go downstairs to check to …
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:54 AM
1

Being unreceptive to those looks will count as causing emotional damage to the woman and you will be fined and jailed.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:19 PM
2

A similar conversation occurred between girlwriteswhat and another commenter here about whether married women's position under coverture was to limit them: I guess I really question the extent that these were really "privileges" and "compensation" rather than simply practical and necessary measures when you limit someone's rights to own property or make financial decisions. "Or we could look at the timeline (I'll keep things to English speaking countries with a shared history of British Common L…
/r/MensRights16/01/20 09:37 PM
4

"A miner was paid according to how much coal he produced, not how many hours he worked. Some miners would take their whole families underground to try to get as much coal as possible, so they could earn more money. Each member of the family would be given a different job to do which would help the miner to get as much coal as possible." Working Conditions In 19th Century Mines What man would consent to do such work? No one got much choice of what work they were willing to do, they did work that …
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:36 PM
4

They worked the same hours for less pay, a cheap unskilled labour pool. They were not excused heavy labour because of "feminine delicacy". If you look under the Marine Corp's website for combat fitness test standards, you can only expect the fittest of women (aged 17-26) to be able to lift less than half as many ammo cans as even a man aged 46-50 in the same amount of time. I imagine this difference in men and women's strength contributed to the difference in their pay in coal mines because wome…
/r/MensRights15/01/20 01:51 PM
1

This is a good website about literacy rates. "It was only until the Middle Ages that book production started growing and literacy among the general population slowly started becoming important in the Western World.2 In fact, while the ambition of universal literacy in Europe was a fundamental reform born from the Enlightenment, it took centuries for it to happen. It was only in the 19th and 20th centuries that rates of literacy approached universality in early-industrialized countries." "The fir…
/r/MensRights15/01/20 01:39 PM
3

During World War I, some women banded together to shame men they saw walking around in what appeared to be civilian clothing because they assumed that meant they were not fighting in the war. They would give the man a white feather- a symbol for cowardice. This article brings up that propaganda was used to encourage women to support the war: "The representation of the war itself was carefully designed to appeal to women. The brutal German invasion of Belgium in August 1914 was immediately charac…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 04:31 AM
2

Sigh, I'm afraid this is purely theoretical right now, but I have previously used the "you're wrong" tactic in the past with lots of information, links, etc. all for them to just dismiss everything with a "you're wrong, I don't need facts to show you because that's just how wrong you are." So, I think I've attempted it a few times without receiving a response, which may be a good sign? Who knows. I certainly agree that feminism is a religion to its adherents, so most of the time I go with the id…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 03:32 AM
2

I agree with everything you said, but feminists believe in men and women being exactly the same so any difference in achievement is the result of discrimination (towards women). There is no female Jeff Bezos, and feminists believe that there must be a female Jeff Bezos so the fact that there isn't can only be because of patriarchal teaching about women. Of course I don't agree with this, the reason why there are no female Bezos is because his wife got 1/4 of his money in the divorce. Women could…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 05:30 PM
1

Note, feminism is for the advancement of women. The assumption that women's advancement is always a move towards equality Women make up a smaller portion, sometimes a very smaller portion of high-earning positions than men. An equal world for them is one where 50% of those positions are held by women therefore female advancement is necessary to achieve "equality". Ability to achieve top positions can be seen as an indicator of how well a group is doing in a society, how equal that society is. Wh…
/r/MensRights03/01/20 03:42 PM
2

It comes from their belief about women as an oppressed class of people who should be taking part of society in equal amounts as men (commensurate with their population percentage). People typically understand and agree with this when about races: African Americans are 12% of the population but if they don't make up 12% of high-earning powerful positions, that must mean something is wrong with our society that prevents them from doing so. Although I disagree that such a thing must mean an unequal…
/r/MensRights03/01/20 02:27 PM
3

How can anyone be considered a true representive of a group? What is required for someone to call themselves a Christian, Muslim, Republican, or Democrat and truly merit that description? I would say that it is when their actions and beliefs fall in line with what is predominantly believed by the majority of a group. If there are foundational texts which were influential to the group's formation or popularity, and continue to be promoted and used by the group, that's a good source for beliefs. S…
/r/MensRights03/01/20 03:36 AM
3

It contradicts their commitment to equality of outcome. When they hear about the non-sexist reasons for the wage gap, differences in career choices, etc. it doesnt matter to them because the outcome should be the same. So they then blame social constructs of gender for why women don't want to work like men, which goes back to their belief that there are no inherent differences between men and women. Although I think these beliefs largely act as a reliable way for such women to absolve themselves…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 03:30 PM
1

Thanks, I agree with all of your suggestions.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 03:01 PM
12

Fellow woman here. Long ago, humans had a mating system that followed a tournament-species, harem-style pattern. In such a system, all of the females are "worthy" of being impregnated, but only by the top males. Eggs are expensive and sperm is cheap, or put another way, a female can only be impregnated by one male, but a male can impregnate innumerable females. So as a species, we have an inherent instinct to want all females to be impregnated- if they want to and only by the top quality males t…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 04:12 AM
2

As we all know, a girl is a complete child, literally walking around in diapers and with the shapeless body of a potato up until the night of her 21st birthday, then, suddenly BOOBS, BUTT, & HIPS spring out of nowehere, the body elongates and the face matures. But before then she's been the exact same as a baby so: a) no female should be having sex before 21 b) they really shouldn't be driving, voting, or making decisions without a parent's consent either I have to say, it is strange how many wo…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 12:13 AM
7

I find that feminists are quite supportive of masculine norms, even "toxic" ones, when applied to women, or in approved feminist ways. So they approve any time a woman is shown being violent to a man whether in a movie or in real life. They approve of men being violent so long as it is about "breaking a man's jaw because he sexually assaulted a woman" (whatever sexual assault means nowadays). I doubt they want the same to be applied when a woman sexually assaults a man. Basically, feminists want…
/r/MensRights29/12/19 08:35 PM
13

I remember taking a feminist course in college a few years back and there were 3 men in the class. The female teacher brought up possibilities for male birth control and snidely said that, "It will never come about because no man will take it." All 3 guys slowly lifted up their hands and emphatically said, "I would." Oh, those feminist teachers aren't biased and sexist at all...
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:15 AM
3

"12And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence. 13For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression .15Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control." The last part implies fault on Eve; she transgressed and thus needs saving. The verses are making the point that Eve ate the fruit, despite knowing it was forbidden, …
/r/MensRights27/12/19 09:39 PM
3

Researching claims of historical female oppression and finding them false is what brought me to this sub, and is now just a regular hobby of mine. Oh and thank you for my first gold.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:05 PM
1

Yes you can use it with my name.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 05:14 PM
12

Some more examples and sources for these topics: Amelia Earheart is another example of a woman easily succeeding in a male-dominated field, indeed, receiving too much praise for her abilities from the start. After Charles Lindbergh's famous solo trans-atlantic flight, a rich woman wanted to prove that a woman could do the "same" thing. "After Charles Lindbergh's solo flight across the Atlantic in 1927, Amy Guest (1873–1959) expressed interest in being the first woman to fly (or be flown) across …
/r/MensRights23/12/19 03:53 AM
2

Yes and no, when women want to dress for men, they could go purely for sexiness, wearing less clothes, but without any regard to the expensiveness of the clothes because men won't notice. When women dress for women, they'll care about whether it's in fashion currently, brand names, etc. And most often women dress in a manner that's a combination of the two: sexy but fashionable.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:09 PM
3

Yes, just like clothes protect your body. But women seek out and demand the ones with the least utility. Men will buy sturdy shoes so comfortable they could walk a marathon in them, or run if needed, and will last for years. Women will buy stiletto high heels that attach to the foot with silk ribbons and could easily snap if one simply places their foot on the floor wrong. And they want a whole closet full of them in every color imaginable.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:22 PM
11

It's about demonstrating status, you can only buy so many shoes if you have access to a lot of money. Women used to do the same thing by having morning dresses, afternoon dresses, evening dresses, etc. The more superfluous a thing is, the more women will use it to demonstrate status (because having superfluous things means you have enough money to afford superfluous things). Men can engage in this to an extent but only things that have some kind of utility: a watch, sports car, yacht, mansion, b…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:51 PM
3

Meh, being able to compel someone to do things for you is certainly an act of power. Having someone provide and take care of you are the fruits of that power being exerted, but the demonstration of her power over him ("He's so into me that he'll open a door for me, he'll spend lots of money on me, he'll do whatever I ask because he just wants me so much") is what makes these acts attractive to women. It's why even feminism has a hard time convincing women that they shouldn't want these things. N…
/r/MensRights16/12/19 05:45 AM
3

it is not common to hear someone say that a woman should abuse her male partner to 'keep them in line' I seem to recall in that Jezebel article 'Have You Ever Beat Up A Boyfriend? Cause, Uh, We Have' that many women commented that her boyfriend "deserved it" and he needed to be "taught a lesson". Or how how about the social injunction that a woman can slap, punch, kick in the balls any man, especially one's boyfriend or spouse, if he offends her somehow, even if just by saying something she does…
/r/MensRights15/12/19 04:23 AM
1

Just going off of the dictionary definition, you can see that it does not mean believing that men and women are equal, it means a specific view of gender equality, one focused on equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity. Feminism: the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes. What do they mean by political equality? Women should represent 50% of politicians because you can't trust men to look out for women's interests. What do they mean by economic equality? Me…
/r/MensRights15/12/19 03:55 AM
17

Okay guys, now we know that all we need is a handsome Chad to act as a figurehead for the MRM and we'll finally get all those feminists to see reason.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 08:41 PM
9

What's the solution then? Toxic masculinity obviously. Really it's just their convoluted way of tasking men with solving environmental problems through the typical mean of shaming. "Men, you scumbags, you haven't figured out yet how to produce all of the things we want to maintain in our world but in a completely clean and environmentally safe way yet? Ugh you are the absolute worst."
/r/MensRights12/12/19 03:18 AM
2

They're not even trying to be subtle about it anymore. This is a quote from John Green's The Fault In Our Stars: “I glanced again. He was still watching me. Look, let me just say it: He was hot. A nonhot boy stares at you relentlessly and it is, at best, awkward and, at worst, a form of assault. But a hot boy... well.”
/r/MensRights11/12/19 02:08 PM
5

Given the example of Amy Schumer, I'd guess most women are able to psychologically turn their perpetration of sexual assaults and rapes into victimization for themselves- that time when a man let her know she wasn't good enough or pretty enough for him because he didn't automatically want to have sex with her. It's just another bad thing men do to them.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:53 PM
2

Oh they just have no choice in the matter! No woman wants to take revealing pictures of herself, or nudes, or videos of herself masturbating or having sex with her boyfriend, especially not to make money off of it! Oh they only do so because these are the only options available to women to make money but they hate every minute of it. /s
/r/MensRights10/12/19 03:39 PM
5

And you're wearing a pretty, frilly dress with roses and people kissing on it. Teehee, you're just so strong!
/r/MensRights09/12/19 08:42 PM
2

It's a male archetype that appeals to men far more than women. For the same reason, men like Luke Skywalker and women prefer Han Solo.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 09:28 PM
1

Are you talking about Zelda?
/r/MensRights07/12/19 08:23 PM
1

I'm merely pointing out trends which, because they are so massively popular with female audiences, represent their desires.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 08:22 PM
2

They can find them attractive, but it's not a requirement that their ideal woman is a bad girl. With women, a man's moral ambiguity or outright moral inferiority is an essential aspect of what makes him attractive to her. Given the choice between two men who both look like male models, are rich, same high social status, and have a charismatic personality, but one is a good noble guy who always does the right thing and the other a bad boy with a devious past- women prefer the bad one. I don't thi…
/r/MensRights07/12/19 07:49 PM
2

I'm not, I'm talking about the romance genre as a whole and how women write men in a romantic light in general. I'm a woman who has been reading romance novels since i was 12 years old, been a part of the fanfiction community since a teenager, and an aspiring writer myself. I've read a lot of books and stories written by women and I know what goes into the process of creating the "ideal" male for women. Part of what brought me to the MRM was realizing the strict limitations placed on male charac…
/r/MensRights07/12/19 07:42 PM
31

Yeah I meant women write their ideal romantic males displaying the most "toxic" masculinity traits, not male characters in general. But what's funny about Harry Potter is that female fans seem to like Draco Malfoy far more than they liked the main character, so much that J. K. Rowling has had to address it and tell them that they shouldn't fancy him. A lot of fans had a thing for Snape before the last book came out which revealed that he was sort of a good guy who was in love with Lily (which ac…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 11:23 PM
69

In movies and books you'll find the same things. Men typically write male characters who are far more emotional, vulnerable, and less sexual than women who write male characters. Women write male characters, especially in romance novels which represent their ideal males, as constantly on the verge of punching some guy, wanting to crack his skull, if he thinks the guy is a rival for the woman's affection. If some guy hurts her or tries to hurt her, his response should always be lethal violence. M…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 09:01 PM
13

Because some of our most basic instincts are: -Women should be safe and happy and men should do everything to ensure their happiness and safety. -Men are agents who are solely responsible for the things they do and cannot blame anyone else for influencing their actions. Women lack agency therefore can be easily influenced by the mere existence of a concept, so cannot be held responsible for their actions- when those actions are questionable in morality. Women frequently portray themselves as vic…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 07:47 PM
3

There's an interesting clarification for the appearance of parity back in the 70s. Black women killed their husbands/ex-husbands nearly 50% more than black men killed their wives/ex-wives.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:23 AM
10

So many of them bring up acts of men putting their safety or lives at risk for others and I'm perfectly fine with that being an exclusively male associated trait because statistically men are far more willing to put themselves at risk for others and it should be recognized more. But it is quite the double standard considering that feminists so often try to tear down any expectation of sacrifice, whether emotional or physical, for women. And I find it highly likely that feminists would agree with…
/r/MensRights05/12/19 01:08 AM
3

The argument implies that women have no influence over and take no part in society. At the very least, if a majority of women had been against men fighting a war they would have banded together more to voice their opinion on the matter as they did with the temperance movement, charity work, workers unions, etc. Rather than protest it, women banded together to administer white feathers to men they assumed too cowardly to go to war, and war propaganda posters were able to portray women encouraging…
/r/MensRights04/12/19 02:09 PM
7

The best part of this is that feminists can react to this in two ways: Believing women get extra angry because of their female hormones during their period is a misogynistic construct of the patriarchy and is used to dismiss women and keep them down. Dismissing the pain and intense emotions that having a period creates for women is misogynistic and keeps women down in a patriarchal world where men not having periods is the standard. And I'm betting both of these thoughts will occur to feminists …
/r/MensRights04/12/19 01:25 PM
5

You can’t give consent if you’re unconscious or in an altered mental state such as being drunk or high. Awesome, I'm sure you intend this to apply to both partners, right? Oh, because this is specifically for UNwomen, you're trying to portray this as only important if a woman is drunk or high? Gotcha. You can only consent to something if you have all the facts. For example, if a partner says they will use protection during sex, but they do not, that is not consensual sex. Ah I'm so glad you incl…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:41 PM
18

More like your wife has raped you for the last 14 years because I'm betting she's never asked for your consent before.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 07:01 PM
0

The thing with The Honeymooners that makes it funny is that we know it's an empty threat, especially if going off of the wife's reaction. She sarcastically responds to him in a bored manner, not cowering in the corner. In comparison, a TV wife today can threaten to cut her husband's balls off, he reacts by cowering in the corner, taking her seriously, and we laugh.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 02:51 PM
3

Feminism is about equality, yes... but only if you agree on its specific view of what equality is. Feminism doesn't just mean believing in equality, egalitarianism means that, particularly because there are no associations between egalitarianism and a defined approach to equality. Put more simply, egalitarianism has no answers to the questions: What does gender equality look like? What causes gender inequality? What needs to happen for gender equality to be achieved? Equality could have very bro…
/r/MensRights27/11/19 05:08 AM
7

Paid labor occurs when someone directly pays you for the work you perform for them, usually work you are paying them to do so you don't have to. This is not the case with a husband and wife who agree to have the wife stay home to raise the kids. She is doing work she must do instead of paying someone else to do it and she shares the money he earns. Most women control the money in a relationship because they are the ones making the financial decisions. Going to the store, ordering things on Amazo…
/r/MensRights26/11/19 09:04 PM
5

I don't think there is anything preventing women from engaging in these jobs. There is a huge push to get women into these jobs and the only problem is finding women who are willing AND capable. Dangerous jobs require people who can fulfill their responsibilities, yet what we see is requirements being lowered solely for the purpose of getting women into these jobs so that they can say they have women on their teams. Women "proving" they're just as strong and brave as men (with the added help of …
/r/MensRights26/11/19 05:46 AM
4

So they believe that women want to oppress men in the dating dynamic, but don't think men are oppressed? That doesn't make much sense to me Maybe I didn't use the term 'redpill' right, I didn't mean it in the way that maybe some PUAs or MGTOWs use it, I just meant that they are critical of feminism and feminist culture, don't support chivalry or gynocentrism, believe in evolutionary psychology, that kind of thing. I think they simply don't want to consider themselves MRA because they aren't goin…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 02:23 AM
13

Women have greater instincts to preserve themselves particularly by avoiding danger. Men have instincts to preserve women and children, even if it means taking on danger for themselves. It's biological, therefore societal norms grew from that biological pressure. For example, Gibbon monkeys have extremely low sexual dimorphism, there is little difference in the size and strength of males and females. Yet, males are still the only ones to engage in physical warfare between tribes and receive phys…
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:34 PM
9

Catching ability also must be, I see only men in the group.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:26 PM
7

I was a non-feminist who still believed a lot of the claims of feminism especially about historical oppression. I was going to write a fictional novel about said oppression and I wanted it to be based on actual history so I began to research. But I didn't find the misogyny that I expected to, so I began to question this view. That led me to Christina Hoff Sommers and Karen Straughan videos. From there on, I increasingly saw how the world is so opposite of how its typically talked about, in so ma…
/r/MensRights23/11/19 03:33 PM
10

one of my favorites to look to on the topic Thanks. The power of hypoagency is a fascinating subject, but also incredibly hard to convince others of... which just goes to show how strong a power it is. I posted once about a study of rural peasant societies and how the author came to the conclusion that women in such societies, including ones in the past, held more power than the ones in her current modern society. Not only does the study highlight many of the ways women have exerted power over s…
/r/MensRights18/11/19 09:49 PM
5

Unfortunately it is a part of our species' reproductive model to want all females to only mate with the best of men and for males to do everything possible to try to live up to women's expectations. In western countries, this has simply been unleashed without restrictions because of feminism, increased safety and wealth, etc. It's going to be very hard to get rid of.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 02:00 PM
3

I like how women have no problem bringing up all of the supposedly million things they do to try to protect themselves from kidnapping or murder in their daily lives, but the second anyone tries to give them advice about preventing rape: "OMG there is nothing a woman can ever do to prevent rape, you victim blaming scum! It's men's responsibility to prevent rape, not women's."
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:38 PM
2

It really demonstrates how these rules can originate from women rather than "patriarchal concepts" placed on women by men, as feminists like to insist.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 08:58 PM
6

The problem I think is that society will never find these messages, even in this moderate degree, acceptable to be given to men. It will never tell men that they don't always need women, or that they should be able to enjoy a career (especially one that doesn't earn a significant amount of money) or stay home to take care of children. It's sad that society can accept these messages in their extreme forms when about women, but will not tolerate them in the least for men.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 11:28 PM
20

Oh but you could have raped someone because they didn't tell you that they didn't want to have sex and you didn't formally ask them. Or, even if that criteria was met, they could have changed their mind, without telling you of course, but hey it's really your fault for not continuously asking them. Even if you have, they could be moaning like a porn star riding on top of you, shouting yes so loud your neighbors can hear every time you ask for consent but it turned out she was just putting on a g…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 05:39 PM
2

A lot of feminists insist in regards to men in positions of authority that "power always corrupts" but never seem to believe that that principle will apply just as equally to women.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 11:29 PM
1

Or just hanging out with other stay at home moms. If pretty much every other mom in your neighborhood or social group stays home, you can have play dates all of the time, giving you a chance to interact with adults and kids a chance to play with their peers. I live in a community with a lot of stay at home moms and it's very easy to meet up.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 09:08 PM
1

What shows are you thinking of? When I was single, I most often said yes to a guy that asked so long as he was in the range of attractiveness I deemed acceptable to myself. I unfortunately can't say I thought much about the feelings of the guy, I would say yes if it was an acceptably attractive guy who was offering free, for me, food or entertainment. I imagine this is the reason why most women say yes to a guy that they're not that really that interested in, because there is really no downside …
/r/MensRights05/11/19 08:35 PM
60

And then in the next breath, the feminist went on to educate us all on the evilness of stare rape.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 09:22 PM
2

This should be changed to continuously through out the sexual act. At the end of sexual intercourse both partners should have an essay length paper filled with nothing but scrawled yeses! (And yes, the exclamation points are necessary to demonstrate enthusiastic consent).
/r/MensRights31/10/19 01:20 AM
2

"There are good black people out there! I used to think all black people were evil, but now I know that's not true. You just need to find a darkie that's not dark, you know? I've only ever met one, but I'm sure there are more out there!" Hey, black people, if you're offended by this, you're a whiny little baby who needs to get over it. Just be glad she learned the lesson she did. /s
/r/MensRights27/10/19 09:27 PM
22

If you're not a witch, you'll sink to the bottom of the lake and drown. If you float, you're a witch and we'll burn you alive.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:30 PM
3

We obviously need to add this feature to vibrators.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 05:42 PM
3

This is the Andrea Dworkin sex robot and it also has a feature to spit in your face every 3 minutes and will try to kill you in 10 different ways. Well, only if it detects that you're a male.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 05:34 PM
2

This is it. Because if they just wanted to get technical, they should start calling male on female rape as 'penetrated'. Both penetrated and made to penetrate would be considered as different forms of rape. They should disambiguate penetration from fingers or penis too as I think most women would consider penetration by a sexual organ to be more traumatic than fingers. But keeping the term rape inflates numbers and allows it to capitalize on the word's social impact and power.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 04:51 PM
6

If anything, feminism is a perfect display of how women can insist on being perceived as weak and in need of special protection and entitlement, and how these views of women need not have originated from men in the first place. That is one of the most enjoyable aspects of living under the current regime of feminism because it is now feminists, not just conservative women who would be accused of "internalized misogyny", who are insisting that men take on more responsibility for women because wome…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 05:49 PM
25

Comparing feminist theory to factual science and math. And, from the same feminist, although they all pretty much do the same thing, continually viewing the actions of men as solely derived from their contempt of women. Example: Me: "Men fought and died in wars so that women wouldn't have to because they loved and honored them. In order to voluntarily die for a person, you have to view them as having more worth than yourself." Them: "OMG, men fought in wars because they thought women were dumb a…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:34 AM
13

3- being a single woman between 25-44 in the United States is-- & I'm speaking from experience-- fun as hell Hmm, and after 44? Let me guess, before 44 it's just so much fun because oh my gosh you can get sex with the hottest guys at the drop of a hat, and you have all of these nice guys willing to take you out on paid dates and shower you with compliments. You feel wanted and all the while you're rejecting those guys that do want you just to feel that you're oh so strong and independent. Gee, I…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:09 AM
17

"We hereby reject presumption of innocence and the necessity of clear evidence in favor of what the accused might have done in the imagination of the accuser. We shall call this from henceforth 'slippery slope presumption' or 'fabricated justice'."
/r/MensRights15/10/19 06:28 PM
7

Where were her smelling salts in case she fainted? I mean, I hate to victim blame, but that one's on her...
/r/MensRights15/10/19 06:00 PM
5

If the story had been about a black man, we would have automatically seen him as a victim. Although I certainly agree that men of color do not get to capitalize as much on victimhood as much as women do in real life (especially from the justice system), it is acceptable to think of them as victims even when they commit crimes as far as the mainstream dominant narrative goes. The same is not true for white men.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 02:44 PM
2

I'm a woman and in 2015 I had an idea for a book. It was originally very feminist, strong kick ass girl as the main character, until I realized that that kind of character was one I was seeing too often and I was just writing it like that to play into expectations. So I began writing from a more moderate perspective but still with a lot of feminist beliefs. Because my story was set in a fantasy world that reflected history, I figured I should brush up on actual historical laws and social convent…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 07:03 PM
11

I don't expect feminists to ever change, but what gives me hope is that the cultural acceptance of feminist claims is changing. Right now when we argue with feminists, they state their beliefs and make their arguments as if they were stating that the sky is blue and 2+2=4, things that are fact and accepted by everyone. But anti-feminist sentiment is growing and eventually we'll live in a world where feminists can't make their claims with total impunity. We're not here to change the minds of femi…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 05:09 PM
29

"Concern for female well-being is unconditional. Women are supported without having to do anything, they just have to exist." It goes even further than that. Our support for females is so unconditional that they can commit atrocities, such as killing their own children, and our immediate response is to lay blame for that act anywhere but at their feet. It must be society, it must be an abusive or unfair husband, it must be that she was mentally unwell. It can't be her fault. We are committed to …
/r/MensRights13/10/19 04:23 PM
2

I actually think the class angle was an allegory for the war between SJWs and anti-SJWs in our culture. When we saw the interview of Thomas Wayne talking about it, not only did he mention running for election but he also dismissed these people as "a bunch of clowns." I thought that was very reminiscent of Hillary Clinton referring to the "basket of deplorables" whilst running for president. The director of the movie has spoken out against wokeness and how it has killed comedy, thus he wanted to …
/r/MensRights12/10/19 05:31 AM
2

Maybe the first preventative measures against domestic abuse protected women against men because a domestic abuse case in which a woman was abusing a man was quite rare in those times. Please read The Wife of Bath by Geoffrey Chaucer, circa 1386. "Well, when I realized that he was never going to stop saying such things, I got so angry that I ripped three pages out of the book, right there as he was reading it. I also punched him in the face with my fist so hard that he fell backward into the fir…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:17 AM
3

In the past, one crime that a wife could not be considered blameless for and her husband solely responsible for under coverture was the running of a brothel. The only other two were murder and treason. Sounds like they understood something we don't.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 02:01 PM
2

I disagree that feminist women are more willing to date a broad range of men, well certainly not marry them anyway. We know that statistics show that female doctors and lawyers, basically any woman that makes a lot of money, will not marry down. Same with education, the women with p.H.ds and masters are the ones most likely to demand men with equal or higher education. These kind of women are far more likely to identify as feminist or liberal than conservative. The mantra of feminism, rather tha…
/r/MensRights09/10/19 05:34 PM
3

The possibility of a miscarriage isn't a factor in why a person gets an abortion. No one says, "Well, I might miscarry anyway, so I guess I'll just 'pull the plug'." People get abortions because they want to ensure the plug is pulled, no matter what. If a person did choose to let someone off of life support, knowing that it was highly likely that they would go on to live a perfectly healthy life in just a few months time, knowing that that person would much rather live than die, I kind of think …
/r/MensRights08/10/19 05:08 AM
5

We need to ensure that murderers can enact their murders in a safe, legal manner...
/r/MensRights08/10/19 12:04 AM
3

There is a difference. Usually the choice to unplug a person without brain activity is because we are unsure of whether the person's brain activity will return. With a fetus/embryo, there is something like a 99% chance that brain waves will begin given enough time. As for the 'it merely has potential for life which is the same as any period a woman has argument', no woman seeks an abortion for having released an egg, only when that egg has been fertilized. Therein lies the difference.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:55 PM
6

Intuition: "Here is the right answer." "Okay, how do you know?" "The magic vagina has spoken!!!"
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:04 PM
26

Suicide rates post divorce are far higher for men than women. They ignored that little fact obviously.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 11:45 PM
5

Women: We want men over 6 feet with an 8 inch dick, makes over 100,000 a year and has never played a video game in his life! World: We support you wholeheartedly!
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:41 PM
3

Why should a man never ever hit a woman if she's capable of putting him in the ICU?
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:27 PM
26

Well, according to my husband, I am the most hardcore anti-feminist in existence and deep down I know that the patriarchy doesn't exist and has never existed in the way feminists believe. So these feminists obviously didn't consult me...
/r/MensRights01/10/19 10:48 PM
3

, They clearly ignore the contradiction in saying that there can be rapes of women where they appear to go along with it without offering resistance and maybe making a slight vocal objection but ultimately allowing it to happen (so the man does not actually apply any force), which could happen exactly the same with a man. My thoughts exactly. Feminists are constantly trying to broaden the definition of rape so that force or threat of force doesn't have to be included in order for the experience …
/r/MensRights29/09/19 06:59 PM
1

As well as feminist reform of marriage laws in the 1800s which gave sole custody of children to divorced women while maintaining the obligation that only the ex-husband must pay for them. Ernest Belfort Bax wrote extensively about men's rights in the early 1900s. This website is also a good resource for learning about the history of misandry.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 02:26 PM
3

"I'm comfortable." That's the key right there. Because for her comfortable means living in a nice apartment, able to eat out at fancy restaurants occasionally, go on a foreign vacation every now and then. Most of the guys she's talking about do make a living wage, a wage that they can live on in their preferred frugal lifestyle. They have a small room in an apartment with roommates, they eat ramen or cereal most of the time because they just want something to eat, and they spend most of their ex…
/r/MensRights28/09/19 03:10 AM
3

Feminism claims to have come about in response to the patriarchy. The existence of a patriarchy, when assuming the feminist version of it (deliberate oppression of women by men), is debatable therefore the need for feminism (with its specific ideas about what equality means and what causes inequality) is also debatable. The men's rights movement came about in response to feminism starting way back in the early 1900s when feminist reform of laws began giving more freedoms and privileges to women …
/r/MensRights27/09/19 09:26 PM
24

I've provided a translation for those who don't understand womenspeak: Money Muscles, stoicism, money Money The behavior of his kids are a reflection of him, the behavior of my kids is a reflection of anyone but me Did I mention money?
/r/MensRights24/09/19 01:02 AM
12

Some differences I've noticed about the male heroes in male and female stories: Men prefer a male hero that is usually poor or working class, but women prefer a male hero (in their romance novels) who is the richest man in the story. The latter has gotten to a point where billionaire romances is a trending genre amongst romance books and now they're trying to make trillionaires a thing. The typical romantic arc for a romance written for a male audience is that the male hero starts out without we…
/r/MensRights23/09/19 02:16 AM
2

Another thing she's not mentioning is how women take great offense by having a less than desirable guy seek to have sex with them. All they need to do is make it clear in a polite way that they do not want sex with that guy. But apparently that's too much work.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 12:50 PM
1

And the majority of rich men didn't gain success because of nepotism?
/r/MensRights19/09/19 03:46 PM
1

I have no idea why you think I contradicted myself, I made the assertion that women often seek to marry a man less physically attractive than her but only if he makes more money than her. Quite a lot of men work more and choose higher paying jobs than women, so many men make more than women. When I say they choose a guy of less physical attractiveness, what that typically looks like is a woman who's a 7 marrying a guy who's a 6 (but an 8 or above as far as earning potential). The more he makes, …
/r/MensRights19/09/19 03:44 PM
1

I'm only implying that they gained success despite a lack of good looks, even for marrying into money and status.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 08:01 PM
1

Women will only date down (looks wise) if you make up for it in wealth or social status (actor or artist). That's exactly what I said in the last sentence of my post. Did you not read it?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 07:55 PM
1

I don't think Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Margaret Thatcher, Hillary Clinton, or Sheryll Sandberg became successful because of their looks...
/r/MensRights18/09/19 06:41 PM
3

The only difference is that women typically seek to get into relationships with men who are less attractive than they are, sometimes significantly less. BUT they often do this to set up a dynamic where the man should always feel ultra grateful that she is with him and he should always work hard to keep her happy and satisfied, basically placing herself on a pedestal and him in the worshiping servant role. They also will not choose a less attractive guy if he doesn't make more money than her.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 06:37 PM
44

You can't take rape seriously unless you take false rape accusations seriously and punish them accordingly. You can't think that rape should be treated as one of the worst crimes a person can do, and also believe that falsely alleging that someone committed one of the worst crimes would have no serious effects on their reputation, social life, ability to get jobs, and mental health.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:54 PM
3

I'm a woman. I did not mansplain to you, but you sure womansplained to me. The external clitoris is just as important for female sexual response as the external penis is to male sexual response. This study disagrees with you. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17970975/
/r/MensRights17/09/19 06:45 PM
2

I don't think the exterior clitoris is being indirectly stimulated when say when both partners are lying on their sides and the woman is facing away from the man, so only penetration is occurring. I kind of think the pleasure women feel when men do deep hard strokes has everything to do with the interior clitoris being stimulated. If we're talking about keeping the vagina with its clitoral extensions, I'll keep my vagina thanks. The exterior clitoris gets way too easily oversensitive imo.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 06:38 PM
6

"After his seminal work in developing theories of natural selection, Charles Darwin devoted much of his final years to the study of animal emotions and psychology. He wrote two books;The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex in 1871 and The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals in 1872 that dealt with topics related to evolutionary psychology." He is considered the father of evolutionary psychology. But realistically, Evolutionary Psychology tries to constantly make these gran…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 05:57 PM
3

Maybe they think the chair is stupid but I bet they also think it's harmless. Not worthy of making a fuss about or calling out others for supporting it. I doubt they'd think the same if it happened to their own gender.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 10:26 PM
15

That is very true and in response I think it is important to bring up that there is no feminist I know of who disagrees with patriarchy theory, what is taught in feminist theory classes, what famous feminists have said and enacted in the name of feminism as well as a lack of negative response to such actions by other proclaimed feminists. They also are quick to point out that such and such actions from a feminist makes them not a feminist so maybe we should point that out to them more- that cert…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:24 PM
9

In their minds it does and the biggest problem we face is a difference in belief of what equality is (equality of opportunity vs outcome) and how the feminist version is presented as the only approach.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 05:02 PM
35

Feminism is about gender equality in the same way that Marxism is about social and class equality- that is, it's understandable and right for their believers to claim their movement is about equality, it's only wrong for them to portray those movements as the only approach to equality and to not tolerate any discussion of other approaches to equality. Belief in Marxism as a movement for equality is predicated on the belief that the bourgeoisie is privileged and intentionally oppresses the prolet…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 04:09 PM
5

I've seen numerous female friends post about it on facebook singing its praises, and as I mentioned, there is a lot of broader discussion in society right now that manspreading is a problem and there should be legal repercussions for it (isn't there already in Spain and the New York subway?). Misandrists only have the power to give out awards or talk about this because the wider culture approves of it. Misogynists don't have the same ability because when they do get loud, the wider culture stron…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 03:35 PM
2

Yes like I said in the case with the article (and there were a lot others like it) they always referred to these women as single moms no matter what their situation was. It mentioned that families with children all from the same father was becoming rare, so although couples sometimes remain together for several years while remaining unmarried, we aren't looking at families who have been in tact for decades and the parents just happen to be unmarried.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 03:17 PM
5

It won an award and a lot of women thought it was a great idea and it made a huge splash in the public media. So if one man made a chair specifically designed to make women sit like proper ladies ("keep those legs closed!") and it was awarded and showcased in many articles particularly written by men in men's magazines and men kept showing their support for it by posting it on Facebook and if there was a lot of talk about making it a social law, but preferably a legal one, to force women to sit …
/r/MensRights16/09/19 02:55 PM
9

"We women ride in cars, we use public transport, we do all kinds of things," she said. "If they are only being designed and engineered by one gender, then the requirements and needs of the other gender can get missed a bit." Said by the gender who designed a chair specifically to force men to sit in a way that violates their bodies' natural requirements and needs...
/r/MensRights16/09/19 03:49 AM
6

Also... I was a boy, and I was taught to cover my drinks and not leave them unattended, and to walk with my car keys between my fingers, and to avoid walking alone too. And a bunch of other shit. And if you don't do those things and you get assaulted as a man, you will definitely be told to do those things as well as be viewed slightly distastefully because you weren't naturally able to protect yourself and needed to learn how.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 03:02 AM
4

It's completely about their gender. When grown women in their 30s can claim that the 11 year old boy they raped was really the one in control and had manipulated them, then age apparently doesn't matter at all and all women are just unthinking objects that can be overpowered by 1 year old patriarchal masters.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 08:02 PM
3

Other things about Iceland: "The world leader in single moms? Iceland. 67% of children are born to unmarried parents." As we see time and again, feminist paradise is always filled with single moms. P.S. What I particularly love about the above linked article is how the tone volleys back and forth between "There's no social stigma about being a single mom in Iceland and it creates such wonderful outcomes!" and "But it's oh so hard for these single moms because, didn't you know, it's hard to raise…
/r/MensRights15/09/19 06:18 PM
5

The belief that women were not as strong emotionally as men resulted in her acquittal on 28 July 1914. And as long as you portray this as solely stemming from patriarchy, that people raise their daughters to be less emotionally strong than their sons, then it is feminist approved and a-okay. If you simply omit the phrase 'female emotions' and instead bring up the strength differential between men and women or societal power dynamics or patriarchal dictates that still somehow affect marriage dyna…
/r/MensRights15/09/19 02:54 AM
4

The only time I've ever slapped a guy was my boyfriend when I was 16. I was in a bad mood about something and he made me laugh and for some strange reason I reacted by lightly slapping him. I was at my most feminist at the time, had only male friends, and deeply believed and enacted the idea that I was the cool strong girl who was able to rough house with the boys by kicking and punching them as much as they did with each other (never considering how they never punched or kicked me and how I wou…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 05:38 PM
5

I don't think the girlfriend in the beginning of the social network was presented as a gold-digging whore, she was presented as in the moral right. The female lawyer talking with Jesse Eisenberg wasn't a gold digging whore. The girlfriend of Eduardo wasn't a gold digging whore so much as crazy, which is nice considering it portrayed a girlfriend's actions as abusive to a boyfriend. Maybe you mean the offhand comment of the twin brothers that they wanted to create a website with a collection of H…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 05:14 PM
3

Witnesses saw Tilby holding the baby while dancing and CCTV footage showed her holding him above her head and throwing him in the air before catching him. Here's another point in her bad parenting skills: babies can't even hold up their own head for the first few months because they lack the neck strength to do so. You have to support their neck with your arm or hand, and should certainly not be throwing them in the air and then catching them.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 04:11 PM
2

2/2 The mere question for sex? Nope. I meant the mere question of rape disables a woman entirely, according to feminists. Contrary to popular antifeminist propaganda, the majority of feminists are not against heterosexual sex. They are against sexual harassment, which if you still don't understand the difference between that and a pleasant, consensual sexual interaction between interested individuals what that is. It sounds like you're aware of some of the more instrumental second-wave feminists…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:54 AM
2

1/2 No, but it's been demonstrated in decades worth of polls that women tend to be more supportive of abortion rights, particularly abortion rights that extend throughout longer lengths of the pregnancy period. Not according to this recent gallup poll: Pro-choice men: 48%, pro-choice women: 43% Pro-life men: 46%, pro-life women: 51% They are also more vehement in their anti-abortion stance. Who created and populates most of the March for Life? I hope you're also aware that a lot of these issues …
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:54 AM
2

I wanted to research portrayals of violence against women in historical fiction because I wanted to compare it with what we see in our media today where, as you said, there isn't a movie or t.v. show that doesn't have at least one instance of violence against men portrayed as comical or morally righteous, especially by a woman. What I found was that it was difficult to find any story where physical violence from a man to a woman was portrayed in a positive light, far more common was to portray b…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 06:19 PM
10

not every single time, but a lot of the times, this has been true. can you really say that a government that is 100% male wouldn't ignore some women's issues? Likewise, a 100% female government wouldn't ignore some male issues? This supposes that male issues are largely agreed upon by all males, and female issues are largely agreed upon by all females as well that the only people who would truly be aware of these issues are of that gender themselves. Abortion rights, for example, though frequent…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 04:46 AM
3

I think male disposability also plays a role. We have such a strong association with men as the appropriate group to receive violence that it makes us dismissive of- and sometimes even desirous to see- any violence a man might receive, whether perpetrated by a man or a woman. Many cultures deliberately create coming of age rites for young men centered around him enduring pain (one tribe creates gloves filled with bullet ants- so called because the pain is comparable to getting shot- and the boys…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:42 AM
2

Also, I know if there is a female James Bond, and she treats men the same way James Bond treats women, I know there is going to be a lot of outrage over that. What makes you think that? Have you ever watched Chicago, where a group of women who admittedly murdered their husbands/lovers do a song and dance about how "He Had It Coming", even for things like popping his gum too loudly? And that this is all done in a morally righteous/comedic way? I assume you mean James Bond goes through a lot of wo…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:28 AM
5

What is supposed to be the sexual objectification of women in our culture? That a woman can become famous and make millions of dollars just by wearing skimpy outfits and posting pictures of herself on Instagram? That it's now socially allowed for a woman to wear skimpy outfits out in public? Do they want to go back to the time when this wasn't allowed? According to feminists, women should be able to wear however little they want and there should be no public censure for those who want to make mo…
/r/MensRights07/09/19 03:43 AM
2

Yeah that and many other shows did not do anything helpful for women's realistic expectations. Not to mention, for being so "feminist" all of the female characters got married or had babies by the end, so...
/r/MensRights06/09/19 07:34 PM
1

It's a true tragedy when women aren't worshipped for absolutely everything they do... /s
/r/MensRights06/09/19 04:04 AM
73

It's both. Women want marriage but only after they're in their late 20s or early 30s. That's the feminist-approved time to marry, after you've sown your wild oats and then you magically find the perfect guy who's just as attractive, intelligent, and financially successful as you are (well, maybe just a bit more to make him a true catch) and of course, he'll be ready to marry and impregnate you at the drop of a hat! Isn't there a statistic that says men are most interested in marriage in their ea…
/r/MensRights06/09/19 03:54 AM
3

My family had chickens for awhile, I too thought the males forced themselves on the females just from how it looked, so I decided to research. Similarly, ducks get a reputation for being rapey, but it turns out female ducks deliberately incite the male ducks to fight over her. Not that rape doesn't happen in the animal kingdom, it's just that there are no species where it is common aspect of the natural mating between males and females.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:06 PM
8

The vegans add: 'The hens do not want to be mounted and always try to escape. They are sometimes seriously injured by the cocks' claws as well.' "The completed mating in chickens is the culmination of a sequence of behaviours. The rooster will initiate mating by exhibiting courtship behaviour: dropping one wing and dancing in a circle (the lowered wing will be on the inside of the circle dance). The hen will crouch (dip her head and body) to indicate receptiveness to the male. The rooster will t…
/r/MensRights05/09/19 03:34 AM
3

I disagree. The point of the question was "when will there be enough women on the supreme court [to satisfy gender equality]?" And I think her point is "until it is all women because it used to be all men." It's about an eye for an eye, tit for tat, revenge.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 12:12 AM
2

He has made her morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit many crimes with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her husband. My favorite part of this is that they present married women's ability to commit crimes as merely making them "irresponsible". Never truly immoral or degenerate, mind you, merely irresponsible, like a naughty child. They are reinforcing the idea that women are naturally moral because even an allowance in crime doesn't make them bad, just immature. I'm…
/r/MensRights02/09/19 04:33 AM
4

I was just thinking as I read about her experience, how great would it be to start off with a typical scene with a woman yelling, insulting, and slapping her husband, but played for laughs as it typically is shown. The audience has a great time laughing at it. Then show the same exact scene but with the genders reversed, with the husband yelling, insulting, and slapping his wife for the same exact reasons. Bet the audience won't laugh then.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 04:48 AM
3

Ms. Reichelt, a Chilliwack B.C., school trustee, described the day a teacher asked a Grade 5 girl if she’d worn her T-shirt to “attract boys,” before calling her parents to pick her up from school. Another student in her teens was chastised for wearing a boat-neck sweater that exposed a bra strap. These issues are always presented as if it were impossible, or at least highly unlikely, that a teenage girl would ever choose to wear an outfit to make herself look sexually attractive. Never! These g…
/r/MensRights01/09/19 04:15 AM
3

Funnily enough, the original plot line was supposed to involve far more abuse by the Joker, and a point where Harley defies him and chooses to be with the Suicide Squad over him. But this did not do well with test audiences, so they edited the movie to make Harley and the Joker have a more likable romance. Given that their story and characters follow exactly in line with the typical female romance novel- dangerous bad boy with a lone soft spot for that one girl who makes him better- I have a big…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 04:34 AM
5

For sure, men usually become the experts and geniuses of every field for a reason.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:32 PM
2

It's not completely without logic, but leaves out the superiority of social power. Women have far more social power than men, and can get men in positions of power and authority to do whatever they as a majority agree on, thus they are far more capable of enacting sexism against men than the reverse.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:28 PM
15

They already think that about math and science. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3482752?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:18 PM
1

And whether a man ejaculates or a woman ovulates only matters if it is happening inside a woman's body, which conceivably, (pun intended) a woman does have control over either way. She can insist on sex that doesn't involve a man's penis ever entering her vagina or keep track of when she ovulates. Oh but apparently denial of any responsibility on the part of women is what's truly empowering for them...
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:12 PM
20

Oh but you see we need girl-designed buildings, They would be ever so different than boy designs, boys just can't even comprehend what stylistic building choices girls would make if a patriarchy wasn't holding them down...
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:00 PM
1

She is not the only one talking about this, it originated from some other woman on Twitter and was then made into several articles. It's the new cool way to talk about sex.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:51 PM
1

1839 "If previously in the majority of the cases the child custody was awarded to the father, the Custody of Infants Act of 1839 permitted a mother to petition the courts for custody of her children up to the age of seven, and for access in respect of older children. This was the starting point of a new doctrine in the area of child custody, called Tender years doctrine. " 1873 "Section 1 allowed the Court of Chancery to order that a mother would have access to, or custody of, any infants under …
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:39 PM
1

Well see it's all about how the "patriarchy" has disabled them. Normally they'd be ever so clever and innovative and strong and powerful if that darn patriarchy didn't keep them down. And in this day and age, people get social brownie points for having disadvantages. It's the ultimate way to assert social dominance over someone. Victimhood is a power.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:31 PM
2

I don’t need to hear some long rambling speech about how incredible you think I am when, in reality, you’re just trying to bust a nut. Modern women seem so outraged by the idea that a large number of men might give them compliments, might act interested in them, just to get sex from them, and then demand that these men should be upfront about it beforehand. These same women see nothing wrong with agreeing to go on a date with a guy just to have him pay for a very expensive dinner when they had a…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 03:33 AM
8

"There is nothing oppressing us." She's making a common fallacy that feminism frequently makes wherein it tries to present all "women's issues" as something all women are for and all men are against, hence when certain things are denied to women, this can only be because men are denying it to women, rather than something that a significant portion of society opposes. When opposition to abortion arises, this is always presented as coming about from men and that all women are pro-choice, which cer…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:25 PM
24

Gender-switched quote: "Sometimes, men find women fun on dates—interesting and charismatic, but not marriage material. I know it sounds like a cliché, but if you want a nice girl—a dependable girl who is wife and mother material—you shouldn’t be dating the photojournalist going to Africa for a safari shoot, the flight attendant who only lands in town every few weeks or the aspiring actress who will be out rehearsing every night. These kind of women aren’t conducive to domesticity. OK, I know tha…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:30 AM
3

I wonder why you are so attached to the feminist label? I think you noted in your post that even the first wave feminists believed and said horrible things about men so weren't about true equality either. For me, it's easy to show why feminism can be considered a movement for equality, but not the movement for equality, as in the only one or interested in multiple approaches to achieving equality. The vast majority of feminists from the very beginning have held certain beliefs, particularly patr…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 02:33 PM
3

They really should have gone with the ad slogan: "Men, use our razors to kill yourself, you worthless pieces of scum." I'm sure that would have worked. /s
/r/MensRights23/08/19 10:58 PM
2

You should look into the histories of the first women who became doctors, lawyers, etc. because they faced hardly any resistence in trying to obtain those jobs. Just about any book from the past heavily implies that everyone tried to avoid needing to work if they could. In Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, the main character is looked down upon because she has some uncles who work as attorneys and such. I really wouldn't characterize wives' sole jobs back then as needing to satisfy her husband.…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 12:33 AM
1

The environment previous to the last century or so made it so that women were naturally dependent on men, needed their help in order to survive, thus a natural respect was incurred. It was apparent and undeniable in a way that isn't nearly so nowadays, from fighting frequent wars to performing necessary manual labor. Still, there were plenty of proto-feminists and white knights who took issue with any praise given to men instead of women (Lucrezia Marinella from the 1600s, Christine de Pizan fro…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 08:29 PM
1

I don't doubt that most women would be interested in seeing the penises of their favorite actors, if anything just to compare. But I imagine men would enjoy seeing more and more pictures of Margot Robbie fully naked, basically the demand would be endless. You don't see that with women even w3ith their favorite male stars who've gone nude. When females go nude, whether they have small breasts or large, whether they are thin or big (think of the models of the fat acceptance movement) it will large…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 05:40 PM
4

Women would say, "we only do this because men want it" and they'd be right. But similarly men go after things that will get them success, money, fame, and status because that is what women want in men.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:42 PM
1

But that's how it was for the majority of history andd was only abandoned for a few decades after the sexual revolution. It used to be a societal rule that people did not introduce themselves to one another without someone they knew of doing the introduction for them, and this was particularly the case for men introducing themselves to women. If you look up social ettiquette books for men written in the 1800s, they state specifically that even if you see a woman who needs assistance on the stree…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:13 PM
3

Oh I agree, my comment came from the topics brought up by the actors themselves, Chris Pine wondered why female nudity was pushed for earlier than male nudity and Sally Field made some vague statement about these issues really being female-centric, probably implying that women are "shamed" for expressing their sexuality (which is contradicted by the double standard brought up in the video itself). I wanted to provide another answer to that question, which also concerns male body image issues.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:05 PM
9

Men have certainly gone shirtless in films for a long time, and for the specific purpose of pandering to female audiences. This is the typical image of males on female romance novel covers and in celebrity sexy photos, the guys don't typically go beyond a shirtless photo or a strategically placed object in front of their package. Women are far less interested in seeing as penises than men are in seeing female genitalia. Hence the furor over unsolicited dick pics, and crickets about unsolicited v…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:40 PM
12

women were valued only for their sexuality and nothing else. I find that's a far more apt way to describe our current society. By allowing total freedom for female sexuality, women focus on it and solely it far too much, walking around in as much revealing clothing as they can get away with, insisting they be able to wear such clothing at any place. In the past, women couldn't use their sexuality until after marriage, so before then women had to develop talents, household management skills, inte…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 02:09 AM
5

Because the human female mating strategy isn't just about getting the best genes to get pregnant with, it's about getting further resources, attention, and protection from a male. In most other species, females don't have to rely on the male as much because their offspring isn't as dependent and weak as ours are initially. They don't look for qualities in males beyond having the best genes. Human females look for that too, but also have instincts to want males who will invest in them beyond just…
/r/MensRights21/08/19 01:57 AM
2

Much like how the upperclass of the Mosuo practice traditional monogamy while maintaining "walking marriages" for the lower classes, with the specific purpose of destabilizing those communities.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 01:45 AM
2

The Declaration of Sentiments, usually considered the foundational document for feminism, is also filled with hateful manblaming, imputing solely negative intentions on men, exaggeration, obfuscation of facts, and outright contradictions. So you can just as well say that that is the feminism of Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, and other first wave feminists.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 09:27 PM
1

It started that way but soon became associated with men helping women, as it is largely known for today. Chivalry became tied to courtly love, a concept popularized by Eleanor of Acquitaine in the 1100s. Under the courtly love model, every man should find a lady love to worship from afar, to protect her whenever needed, and do her bidding even if it puts his life at risk to get the smallest trinket for her. She can reward him with affection or even sex, but he should be willing to do all of thes…
/r/MensRights19/08/19 04:26 PM
2

Yes, I'm a mean asshole for not being her unpaid valet Everyone please remember this as a counter argument for the "unpaid domestic work of women" one. Men are socially expected to be bodyguards of all women 24/7, yet, GASP, they aren't paid for this work!
/r/MensRights19/08/19 04:12 PM
0

He is implying that the entire society is hostile and abusive to men, which certainly wouldn't apply to women.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 11:03 PM
9

Feminist ideas about sex and consent are inconsistent. They push the idea that so long as sex between two people is consensual, then sex is of little importance and should be viewed as two people shaking hands or healthily engaging in exercise together. Yet they also believe that the second any kind of sexual act turns less than 100% enthusiastically consensual, it becomes the worst most traumatizing event ever, worse than murder. The first position is comparable to giving someone a dollar. Beca…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 10:55 PM
6

"They want to be free to do things that men aren't allowed to do." This is applied in so many areas: Woman who wants to sleep around no strings attached? What a brave, sexually independent woman! Man who wants to sleep around, no strings attached? What a mysoginistic cad, who treats women like objects! Woman never wants to get married, never wants children? She's just so strong and independent, she doesnt need anyone to complete her. Man never wants to get married, never wants children? What an …
/r/MensRights16/08/19 09:57 PM
3

Yes she seems to be perpetuating the idea that all male on female rape is inherently violent and that causes the trauma, the trauma of being violently penetrated against their will. But this then means that a man who rapes a woman without violence, without inflicting pain, shouldn't be considered a rapist or only rape that is painful is true rape. That's obviously wrong as anyone understands that the inherent act of being forced into a sexual act with or without pain, whether fingering or a hand…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 06:02 PM
57

Oh that will just be potrayed as those scummy fathers abandoning the woman. She wanted to marry him, but he wasn't interested! She didn't want to divorce him, but he was just such a terrible husband and father! She wanted to find a guy worth marrying/dating/more than just hooking up with one night, but there were none to be found! See it's all men's fault. /s
/r/MensRights16/08/19 05:27 PM
5

The information would suggest an increase in mass shootings since the 1960s, a time when feminist theory, and with that discussions of masculinity and males as problematic, became mainstream. If the problem was traditional concepts of masculinity or patriarchy, wouldn't we see more mass shootings in the past, or at least mass killing atrocities by men, and less now?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 05:16 PM
3

I love how their automatic interpretation of "transmen experience more abuse" can only be about male partners abusing pre-transition females. As if transmen experiencing abuse from their new female partners wouldn't happen.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:52 AM
1

Considering that men throughout most of history wore clothing to accentuate their sexual attractiveness in the "objectifying" way feminists complain about with women today: tight, form fitting, accentuating pants, tights, etc. Shouldn't that mean they have more right to complain about 5 millenia of sexual objectification than women do?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:19 AM
6

The reality is that, whilst 95% of all victims of violence (women or men) experience that violence from a male perpetrator. Staristics on domestic violence (the kind not influenced by the Duluth Model) alone debunk this. Females perpetrate violence on females and especially males, but it is often interpreted by everyone else, especially feminists, as either harmless or laudable.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:58 PM
44

It's ironically representative since the feminist character doesn't give any valid argument or defense, just ends it with a "sassy" comeback that is intellectually equal to a poof of air. That cheers me up.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 01:58 AM
1

Women do in-group identify as "women". Because of this it does not suprise me that there are male feminists because males identify with a cause "outside of themselves" as their principal source of Meaning Which is why although women sometimes take issue with feminism and may not want to call themselves feminist, many feel positive associations with the idea, generalizing its meaning to be "women supporting women." It's why you can get women to listen and pay attention to almost any issue so long…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 08:35 PM
9

When prison sentencing differences are brought up: "That's viewing women as weak, and feminism is very much against that." When domestic violence disparities are brought up: "Women are weak in comparison to men, there is nothing a woman can do to really harm a man and he needs to just walk away from her child-like punches!"
/r/MensRights14/08/19 04:42 PM
2

Society may have been patriarchal in the dictionary sense of the term, males holding positions of authority, but that does not necessarily mean what the feminist version of it means: men oppressed women with those positions of authority. Because: a) Just because men filled positions of authority that does not inherently make for an unbalanced, male-centric world. It does not mean men will solely make a society that promotes male interests and demotes or ignores female interests. You probably und…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 05:02 AM
5

And I've so often heard that women want men to prioritize them for their intelligence, ambition, and financial success. Guess they were wrong...
/r/MensRights12/08/19 07:57 PM
1

I think it will come down to what evolution always comes down to: who has children and whose children survive to pass on their own genes. So going back to our previous example of obesity, I think our new environment will produce a change in our biology. Obese people typically pass their obesity-inclined genes to their children who in turn incur health problems from that and may not live to pass on their genes. Thus evolution will select for people with either fast metabolisms or who are capable …
/r/MensRights12/08/19 07:43 PM
8

Majority of comments: Buttons! Oh if only men could understand the burden of buttons on big bosoms! There is simply no way a large-busted woman can wear a button-up shirt without a gap appearing between the buttons where her cleavage is AND also wear it in a way that is flattering and sexy and shows her body to its best advantage. And I think we all know that the latter is most important here!
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:32 AM
3

It's precisely why I didn't vote for her. I honestly shudder to think what life would be like if she had been elected.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:00 AM
1

I think if we get enough women on board, we have a chance. This is how feminism happened, this is how true equality can happen. There is enough dissonance in women with regards to feminism that could create some wiggle room for other ideas, at the very least a rejection of feminism.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 03:58 AM
1

Men who stepped in front of danger to save a woman over themselves never bred Unless the woman he saved was also the woman he impregnated, which would contribute to the survival of his genes far more so than if he lets her die. As well there is the grander scale of men choosing to fight in wars so women wouldn't, thus ensuring less future decrease to the population.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 03:35 AM
5

Are they not basically attacking someone who is defenseless?" Such a great point. "Why would you provoke / attack someone who could really cause you harm if they decide to engage?" "As a man I sure as hell am not going to provoke another man who is 5 inches taller, and weighs 80lbs more than I do, keep hitting him and not expect him not to lay a finger on me. The thing that really clinches it is that women understand this in regards to other women. They will be careful about what they say to a w…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 08:09 PM
127

It's even closer to when Hillary Clinton said women shouldn't go to jail because only male influence makes them commit crimes.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 07:58 PM
4

A lot of shorter women insist that they need a really tall guy to balance out their future children's height. Sounds like short guys want to do the same with you.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 07:50 PM
1

If a country has a 50/50 split in terms of economic or job position, it will rank higher If it is skewed, it ranks lower (Latvia) Only if the skew is negative for women, so less women receiving education than men, less female engineers, etc. If there is an overabundance of women in an area, it will not be contribute to the negative score. "The report's Gender Gap Index ranks countries according to calculated gender gap between women and men in four key areas: health, education, economy and polit…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 05:41 PM
2

I suppose single women in their 30s who are hell bent on getting married and having babies will pass over a bad boy for a stable guy. But pretty much every other demographic of women I've seen wants to be the "cure" to the bad boy's problems, especially if he's physically attractive. I've seen plenty of divorced women in their 30s, 40s, and 50s going after drug addicts, alcoholics, and near sociopaths. It's not because there aren't other men available. This has definitely been the case with most…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:04 PM
2

They tend to avoid those men who are raging alcoholics and drug abusers...especially as the women get older and are looking for stability, Women want to marry those guys, it's just that those men won't marry them, especially when they're older and getting close to the wall. Although women certainly will opt for financially stable guys to marry (often, that may be the only incentive for her to marry the guy whom she otherwise feels no attraction), they would prefer far more the status that would …
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:38 AM
1

Are Latvia and Estonia places with the least gender roles? I think they're still pretty traditional in comparison to say Sweden or Norway. On a gender equity index, Latvia ranked 41 and Estonia 30, whereas the US got 13. Latvia is one of the poorest countries in the EU, as is Estonia. According to this Latvian women outnumber men there by 8% of the population, and in Estonia there are only 87 men for every 100 women. A similar effect occurs in African countries and really any country torn by war…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:52 PM
1

I wonder if certain masculinity points are fulfilled, then a man can do a lot of things considered less masculine. Circumstance can mean a lot. When women worked in factories in WWII, that was an example of circumstances necessitating that response. But I would say after the war ended and women left those jobs and never returned in any significant numbers to that kind of work, that would indicate a lack of interest due to biology. Likewise, countries like Thailand, Trinidad, Azerbaijan, Tunisia,…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:48 PM
3

I think women have access to powers that are unavailable to men which is why men easily dismiss them. It's very hard to convince men that women can capitalize on being seen as vulnerable, powerless, helpless- that that can be a power for them to wield in society. In discussions of the past, I always come up against this stalemate with men I argue with- the idea that women would never want to be seen as lacking agency or weak or in need of men to do things for them. But, women are doing the exact…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 04:31 AM
4

I think they view those as naturally occurring, anything less than that is considered "misogynistic" or "potentially detrimental to women" so it's an outrage. They don't view it as a privilege, they see it as the way it's supposed to be. But also most women for the past several decades have grown up with the idea that if they want something, they should have it. There are no restrictions and even feminism is often afraid of telling women no. Hence, they can write about how they really want to en…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 04:04 AM
1

This was my realization, too. In an article posted in another thread, a woman wrote about how there are troubled teen girls in high schools, "There was one who'd set fire to her own locker, another who quietly cut her arms and legs, another who regularly ran herself to exhaustion around the track and then made retching sounds in the bathroom. These, it seemed, were the girlish responses to pain. Inward, self-harming responses, enacted on their own bodies. Sad. Tragic. Material for an after-schoo…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:43 AM
1

I've really enjoyed discussing this with you, by the way. It's nice to finally debate things on reddit with an open-minded person. But then again, I'm trying to be less antagonistic in my arguments now. I don't know if we have a culture that promotes men being emotionally available though. What I mean is that this is being discussed in the mainstream media. There are campaigns that discuss how it's a problem that boys and men are shamed for crying, feeling afraid, etc. I agree that this is large…
/r/MensRights08/08/19 02:18 PM
5

Not to mention fat women being able to secure no strings-attached sex with conventionally attractive guys, and then telling themselves that these guys are actually attracted to them and wanted to be with them, it's just seen as a shameful taboo by society... Men Who Want Sex With Fat Women But Won't Date Them Things No One Tells Fat Girls, So I Will
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:04 PM
1

I think it would influence men to a certain degree, in the same way that our cultural promotion of women being strong and powerful has affected women to a degree. The vast majority of women do believe they can do anything a man can do and that the definition of a woman is far more than traditional notions of femininity. But much of this has resulted in more competition between women as well as pressure to be a certain way. The idea of what makes a "strong, independent woman" places expectations …
/r/MensRights07/08/19 08:49 PM
1

I think given the extreme popularity amongst women (Amazon UK sold more copies of 50 Shades of Grey than the entire Harry Potter series combined) that demonstrates how much those kind of fictional men and stories satisfy the fantasies of most women. But I think environment can play a role, too. As I said before, female primates default to wanting natural alpha genes, but can be persuaded to choose lesser males for their ability to share resources and attention. What they would prefer most is the…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 04:36 AM
1

Butting my head in here to say that the theory which makes most sense to me is that we went from a tournament species to a pair bonding species, but with lots of overlap remaining. You can even see it currently amongst female primates who may be convinced to mate with a lower order male if he demonstrates his willingness to share his food with her, look after her kids, etc., things an alpha male isn't willing to do for her because meh, he can get sex from females without needing to offer those t…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:06 PM
6

"Katie set fire to her locker! There must be something wrong in her life, we need to talk to her, get her to a counselor." "Jon set fire to his locker! This boy is a danger to all students and can no longer attend here. We recommend he be placed in juvie with all the other soon-to-be psychopaths." Majority of suicide victims are males. If that's not inward self inflicting harm, I don't know what is. Women sometimes engage in self harm to get attention, sympathy and affection. When men engage in …
/r/MensRights06/08/19 03:30 PM
5

There is a reason why women love soap operas where couples are always getting together then breaking up again and again.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 02:54 PM
4

Several years ago an acquaintence who was at least in her mid 20s told me that she enjoyed sleeping with high school boys because "they will worship your body." I think this represents well the mindset of women who rape/assault young men and boys- the idea that they'll be fulfilling the young boy's fantasies and will rock their world. It's a massive ego and power trip, and very much based on the idea that what they're doing isn't really wrong. If men have a god complex, women have a goddess comp…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 07:56 PM
2

Will there be a video on this or a post on your blog? This sounds highly interesting.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:22 PM
1

And so often they are teachers, or mothers as well. You'd think that would give them a history of and capability of saying no to children, particularly boys... You know those little boys who make fart jokes, and try to run around the classroom while she's teaching, and hit some classmate, oh that she can handle and tell him to stop, send him to detention, no problem. B-but if he were to flirt with her, make a move on her, ask her to have sex with him, oh! She would be like a deer in headlights! …
/r/MensRights04/08/19 10:26 PM
1

I wrote this post in a sarcastic manner and I meant it in a way that would click with most people's understanding of male circumcision. Take the foreskin off of a penis to get it more air, decrease the hot wet environment "so prone to infection." Take the labia majora off to get the vulva more air, decrease the hot wet environment "so prone to infection". The foreskin covers the penis like a sheath; lips cover the vulva like a sheath. I know that the clitoral hood is often compared to the foresk…
/r/MensRights04/08/19 10:02 PM
1

It really is true. I'm so tired of always hearing about "that one place or group there, that's where men really do oppress women!" And then if you actually experience the culture or really investigate into it at all, it becomes apparent that women have entitlements to make them equal, protected, and able to control their partner or their society in their own way. Coming from a group that is often thought of as misogynistic, but is really steeped in gynocentrism, chivalry, and feminism when it's …
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:43 PM
1

I agree, but this is an argument frequently made for male circumcision so I was applying it to vaginas so that people could see how wrong it is. Cutting off the foreskin doesnt make a penis cleaner either.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:20 PM
1

My friends were Chinese too when I lived there, both men and women. They worked with both me and my husband and we often talked about relationships, dating, etc. We would go out with them and their boyfriends/girlfriends, sometimes to their homes to meet their families. I never saw a woman suddenly turn into a "prisoner", but I saw a lot of men who would fit that description.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:16 PM
1

Definitely not what I saw. Why would women be able to dominate men in public yet in private somehow turn into their slaves? How exactly did you see what happens in private?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:55 AM
2

You have to want to eat the burrito, but you must not eat the burrito. You should hunger your whole life for sweet, sweet ethnic foods, but never let them touch your lips. Only then will you understand what life is like for minorities... /s
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:53 AM
0

I'm an American living in China. Women here are 3rd class citizens for the most part. Total bullshit. Every married couple I ever saw, the husband was controlled by the wife, especially in financial matters. They would call the wife to ask if they could purchase even just a soda.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:27 AM
3

I believe that too but it's hard to convince people who staunchly believe it is beneficial and have a lot of seemingly credible studies to back up their opinion. I find it better helps them question things when you argue, "okay, if it does provide those benefits, let's find something similar for women." That makes them pause.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 01:07 AM
11

But those arguments in favor of female circumcision never reach the ears of countries who don't practice it and even when you tell people about it, they dismiss it because they already associate FGM so strongly with something horrific and circumcision with something beneficial which makes them shut down any further discussion. Presenting it this way, where it is a hypothetical surgery, allows people to question whether it is moral or not, even if the benefits are true. Sadly they can only begin …
/r/MensRights29/07/19 09:42 PM
16

And that if something bad happens to even one woman, then everyone is deeply misogynistic for not preventing it.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 06:51 PM
21

Men cause 100% of unwanted pregnancies by ejaculating into a woman. Women cause 100% of unwanted pregnancies by allowing men to ejaculate into them.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 04:21 PM
2

It would reduce an area or conduit for pleasure but not take away sexual pleasure completely. Women experience sexual pleasure and orgasms during intercourse without their clitoris being touched at all, because the penis is stimulating the clitoral extensions in the vagina. Cutting off the penis is comparable to a woman having her clitoris and vagina removed. Taking away all ability to have sexual pleasure as well as the ability to procreate without doctors and have intercourse at all.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 02:53 PM
6

Agreed, I just wanted to correct her analogy of saying FGM was comparable to a man getting his penis cut off.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 02:26 AM
22

She is the one who doesnt understand about female anatomy. The clitoris extends into the vaginal area so pleasure can still be felt even if the exterior nub has been excised. Hence even women with the most extreme forms of FGM can still orgasm and enjoy sex.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 12:26 AM
5

Everyone is appalled that Quentin Tarantino treats his female characters as disposable as his male ones. "The buildup of that scene relies on Melanie to be woefully cruel to Louis, to the point that viewers might say, "She's asking for it." When the shots ring out, there is a relief because the agitating factor has been eliminated. A woman's life has ended." Hollywood Reporter (article above) "A pretense of equality exists in the text. "I see you don't have any mixed emotions about bringing a wo…
/r/MensRights28/07/19 07:45 PM
1

"It's okay for me to criticize these trends, because I am doing so in an oh so enlightened way. But those men who criticize it are just such obvious misogynists incels who live in their mom's basement. They just hate women people! By the way, all men suck amirite?"
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:53 PM
2

They'll take the viewpoint that women are so trusting and good, they just can't conceive that a man would pay her false compliments to get her into, egads, his BED! And men are just so evil and conniving, they aren't smarter than women, just immoral. They're taking a lot of Victorian viewpoints lately, like a man wanting to only have sex with a woman is an egregious thing. It really demonstrates how the Victorian conventions were not patriarchal concepts placed on unwilling women by men, because…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 02:26 PM
3

That's what caught my eye too. "Ooh those terrible women who reinforce patriarchal notions of what a woman should look like! Those aren't real feminists, I am! Now let's talk about how all white men are evil and need to be replaced with women and the importance of political lesbianism..."
/r/MensRights27/07/19 01:51 PM
2

Try doing the same thing with women. Shockingly, they'll give you the same warnings about women.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 01:42 PM
9

Women on the internet: men owe us power and money and relationships and romance and attraction and chivalry. A man who rejects any woman for any reason deserves to be punished. Also women on the internet: Men who only want to have sex with women are misogynistic objectifying assholes who deserve to die. Men who want relationships and sex from women but the woman isn't attracted to him, otherwise known as "nice guys", also deserve to die. Actually, all men deserve to die, #killallmen Also women o…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 01:34 PM
2

What i find funny is that the same people who love the anecdote are the ones who also believe that previous to the 1960s, rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment weren't taken seriously at all, certainly not by the judicial system. Yet, they don't blink at hearing a judge rule in favor of a woman biting the nose off of a man who tried to kiss her....
/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:15 PM
8

I'm on that planet too. I can't wait to see people cheer a man giving a good punch to a woman who tried to kiss him without his consent. I mean, it's less than biting off her nose, right? That makes it acceptable.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:09 PM
3

since times when girls were prevented from learning at all. That time has never existed. Education has meant a lot of complex things throughout history, and it is only recently that it has existed in the form it currently does, where we believe everyone must study largely abstract concepts from the time that they are 5-21 years old. Education throughout history largely meant learning skills, and using those skills for financial benefit. Women learned skills that they would be able to use for wor…
/r/MensRights24/07/19 05:17 AM
9

Well, don't you know? Women are warrior goddesses who are the force of all good in the world. So when someone causes them the slightest dishonor, it needs to be shouted from the rooftops. And men are scum so they deserve anything bad that happens to them. /s
/r/MensRights24/07/19 04:43 AM
1

"Even if one hadn’t read the novels (in which Ramsay’s sexual and emotional abuse is more explicit), it was pretty clear what was coming. Still, the show handled the controversy badly. HBO executives made tone-deaf remarks about how male characters on the show were regularly killed off, as if this was a moral equivalent." Ramsay never married or raped Sansa in the books, wasn't that what the controversy was supposedly about? That they had it happen when there was no source for it? I assume they …
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:18 AM
3

Women are equal to dogs in society!
/r/MensRights22/07/19 11:59 PM
5

“Any industry dominated by men at the top inevitably produces output that is objectifying, objectionable and offensive to women” Really? What is so objectionable about some pizza dude screwing the MILF who answered the door? Oh no, it's because he didn't "make love" to her! He screwed her- like, well, a screw! That makes it objectifying! How offensive! Women only want to be "made love to". They want a man to lay her lightly on a bed of rose petals, and gently, ever so carefully, with the utmost …
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:54 AM
1

Maybe I'm conflating non-feminists with anti-feminists, as I haven't met too many 100% anti-feminists in real life, but I'm pretty sure that's the group that this video addresses. They reject the label and are anti-feminist about some things, but believe feminist theory about men currently having it easier than women and historical oppression of women. They pick and choose what they like from each table: thinking of oneself as a strong, independent woman who has an exciting career and don't need…
/r/MensRights21/07/19 03:36 AM
4

Anti-feminism does largely come about from women's recognition of feminism placing its own pressures and expectations on them that they don't want and therefore reject the label, as well as a particular association with angry, unattractive women. I would definitely agree that that rejection still comes from an entirely women-focused viewpoint and therefore is similar to feminism because it isn't really about equality, it's about "not even feminism gets to tell me what to do as a woman." I have f…
/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:49 PM
1

Oh, thank you! I greatly enjoy your posts too. The only thing that holds me back from making a youtube channel is the potential for doxxing and threats since I've got small kids, but it sounds like a lot of it is empty.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:09 PM
2

What's funny is that women have always been the ones to push for less social strictures on their dress, enabling them to display their sexuality more. They were the ones to demand shorter skirts, shorts, cleavage-bearing tops, and they still want to push it even further by "freeing the nipple". They obviously do this so that they can use their sexual attractiveness to their advantage as much as possible. Yet, like with everything, there are downsides to this decision. By increasing the social ac…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 04:20 PM
1

If you're 6'8, I assume your sister must be somewhere around 6' herself? I've never known women more obsessed with height requirements than really tall and really short women. Tall women want a man taller than she and will not consider men who are shorter. Short women insist they can't date short men because then their children will be doomed to be short.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 03:24 PM
3

Then tell anyone that it was men's fault for being too intimidated by her amazingness.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 03:06 PM
1

Women have every ability and need to take more responsibility in this area, not just men. They can insist on men never ejaculating inside of their vaginas and instead use other forms of sex like oral or anal. If they're okay with a slightly increased chance of getting pregnant, they can apply those rules just for the week leading up to ovulation. It's fine to say men should do more to ensure unwanted pregnancies but women can too.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:25 PM
1

I realize this was from more than a week ago. Sometimes after I've been debating with someone, I get a bit tired of the stress it puts on me, and I just avoid checking my messages for a bit. It's cool if you don't want to re-open this discussion, but I just wanted to reply to some of the things you said. Why must we assume that if women arent participating as much in a certain industry that there must be something preventing them from doing? Because for thousands of years it was discouraged and …
/r/MensRights15/07/19 04:24 AM
26

A particularly good example of this is when feminists bring up emotional labor and the dissatisfaction women feel being in charge in the household and needing to tell their husbands what to do all of the time. Then the position of superior authority suddenly becomes a tool of victimization from their husbands! He's just the loaf who sits around all day, expecting her to give out orders, do things because he's incompetantt at it, making her his slave! When Ricky Ricardo needs to tell Lucy what to…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 06:18 PM
3

This is why I always read your comments. You're always good for a chuckle, fengpi.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:24 AM
16

It sounds like it was a bad situation for both. If the IUD was causing the problem with sex, why not take it out and use another form of birth control? She might not have liked his reaction to the problem, but it's legitimate for him to be unhappy with her, what sounds like, never wanting sex. That's a problem for both of them and needed to be resolved as soon as it began. She says he never talked to her about not wanting to have sex, did she try to tell him why? Did she talk to him about a more…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:48 AM
1

"Chards of glass were everywhere. In her fury and panic at the prospect of being abandoned she'd take huge pieces of sharp jagged mirror glass and come at me threateningly. For the first time I seriously believed she could actually kill me." Aaannddd the typical feminist response to this is, "but are those men really physically afraid?" Source: top comment on the Jezebel article about Have You Ever Beaten Up A Boyfriend? Cause, Uh, We Have.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 07:19 PM
2

The thing is I'd watch those matches. Considering they lost, they should be up against 13 year olds. Again, something I would eagerly watch. That would get their revenue up.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 11:30 PM
3

I agree, a lot of women pick and choose what they like about feminism and what they don't. Although they may not call themselves feminists, they hold a lot of its beliefs, like men being more privileged than women. But feminism often places pressures and new ideals to live up to which a lot of women don't like and hence many don't identify as feminists. I'm considering making a youtube channel for anti-feminists starting from the angle of, "here are all of the messed up things feminism does to w…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:54 PM
6

I think it may be impossible to advocate solely for men. Much of men's unhappiness is caused by feminism and so if we can take away feminism, we can solve a lot of problems. The way to do this may be through anti-feminism which is already pretty popular with women.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 05:16 PM
3

When feminists insist that any advice to women about trying to prevent rape is "victim blaming", we've got a problem. There are things people can do to prevent rape, and those things do include not being out late alone, not getting so drunk that someone could victimize you, and not wearing clothes that can easily be removed. If you neglect to lock your car, your home, if you leave your purse or wallet out of reach at a party, is it your fault when they get stolen? No, but you left yourself a lot…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 02:42 PM
6

All 28 members of the team filed a federal gender discrimination lawsuit against the United States Soccer Federation in March, citing the fact that they are paid less than their male counterparts despite having the same job responsibilities Job responsibilities? Kick a ball in a fashion that makes for an entertaining watch. According to crowds and the money they're willing to pay to watch such a thing, the women are NOT fulfilling the same job responsibilities as the men. OMG you guys! I just fo…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:32 AM
2

Compare The Office's Michael Scott with Leslie Knope from Parks and Recreation. These are very similar shows with I think the same producer or writer. I believe Parks and Rec came about as a version of The Office but with a female lead. It was supposed to be feminist you know because the world needed a female version of a Michael Scott. Watch the first episode: Leslie Knope is often boorish, says racist remarks, disliked by her underlings, basically comparable to Michael Scott. But I imagine thi…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 07:01 PM
3

"Bizarrely, Foote notes, the females actually elicit this behaviour by intentionally flying over the territory of other males. Evolutionary biologists believe that female mallards encourage these forced copulations to raise the odds of successful fertilization." https://www.stalberttoday.ca/local-news/the-extraordinary-sex-life-of-the-common-mallard-1285259 Same with female primates who elicit males fighting over who gets to have sex with her. Everything is a shit test.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 06:19 PM
2

Feminists believe sexual meaning in clothing should only be perceived when permission is granted by the person wearing (or not wearing) them. If she has not given permission yet, any man who looks on her should not address or think of her in a sexual manner, even if she is naked. The woman will tell him if she wants him to think of her that way. Likewise, a woman choosing to display herself in a nude or sexual way can be acceptable so long as she is doing it "for herself." A woman who is doing s…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 05:42 PM
3

"Shut it down after the first "come over" text, don't fucking sit there and admittingly purposefully manipulate (yes, saying "I wanted to see how far she would go" is manipulation, he purposely wanted to see how far he could imply interest.) someone to get off on some sick power trip." Pure conjecture, imputing machinations on the OP that he never said. "I wanted to see how far it would go" could just mean I wanted to see how far this pervert would go, so I could have proof. It's very easy to se…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 07:50 PM
1

And there are women's sports venues that do better than men's, such as ice skating and gymnastics. These showcase more delicate, ballet-like features that appeal to, largely, female audiences. Neither men nor women are interested in seeing men display delicate maneuvers, and they are also far less interested in seeing women trying to display brute strength. Neither fulfills that ideal as much as the other sex can.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:17 PM
29

You know what I'd pay money to see? A bunch of 15 year old boys soccer team beat a national woman's team in a game. You know what I wouldn't pay money to see? A national women's soccer team playing against other countries' women soccer teams. It's not because it would be uninteresting. It's just that they've made such a big deal about it- "women are just as good as men in soccer!" If a fifteen year old boys team made a big fuss about themselves and said they were just as good as any national tea…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:49 AM
65

This makes it clear that all sports teams, actors and actresses, musicians, basically all people in the entertainment business should just pool their money together and divvy out completely equal salaries to each person. A newcomer actress in a movie that hardly anyone ever went to should make exactly as much as Meryl Streep or Tom Cruise in any of their blockbuster films. 'Cause they all do the exact same job. It just makes so much sense. /s
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:39 AM
7

The Global Gender Gap Index which gives "gender equality" scores to all countries in the world is solely calibrated on factors where women are disadvantaged to men, but never the reverse. When women are advantaged over men, the score does not account for this. So when women gain more education than men, such as in America, this does not give America a negative score in educational gender equality but rather a positive score. The same with life expectancy where some countries are given a negative…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 10:15 PM
5

Feminist instructions to men: Referring to women you've slept with as "notches on your bed post" is demeaning, objectifying, and treating women as if they aren't human beings. You should not be trying to have sex with someone just to have sex, you should only have sex with someone that you have some kind of connection with, some kind of interest in them as a person. Anything less is using the person as a masturbatory tool and should be considered rape. Feminist instructions to women: Woohoo get …
/r/MensRights07/07/19 08:32 PM
11

There have been constant depictions in art and the like of couples enthusiastically engaging in sex, women masturbating, all of that. Everyone in the world has known that women enjoy sex and seek it out. The vibrator was invented in the 1800s and used by doctors to bring women to orgasm for their health. Until the 1960s there was a heavy social restraint on having sex before marriage , so that children would not be born outside of marriage. But the advent of the birth control pill, theoretically…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 02:39 PM
10

Feminism: Women are so strong and tough, way more than men! Also feminism: I literally can't handle someone looking at me in a way I don't like.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:31 AM
19

That's exactly what a rapist would say... /s
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:26 AM
8

Pandering to the paranoia of women> every other issue in the world
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:23 AM
3

I think it's a bit of both. The relationship between the sexes is like a contract negotiation between two people: both wanting to get the best deal they can from each other, but also needing to compromise in order to be able to work together and come to an agreement.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 11:49 PM
29

Yeah if this was a guy rubbing/kicking his foot between a girl's legs, most people would see it as sexual assault. And they'd have no problem with a girl beating him up for it, either.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 03:54 AM
30

As well as "safe spaces" in colleges for certain groups but men are not allowed to have these. There can be women only colleges but no male only colleges. Quotas for jobs and majors in college that actively discriminate against men. 'Women only' bathrooms and 'All sexes' bathrooms.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 10:09 PM
3

Getting the ingredients to cook, including hunting and therefore putting one's life at risk? Not oppression. Cooking ingredients? Total and complete oppression. The majority of men I know, when left to their own cooking needs, keep it simple and are content to eat the same meal every night. Women like to make it fancy, different meals and requiring lots of time and preparation. They mainly do it for their own tastes and desires.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 02:49 AM
1

How do you not blame men when you also believe that women were treated like property, one would assume, by men? Despite being no lesser in maths, they’re unrepresented in many industries They are overrepresented in many other industries, ones that previously they did not engage in such as biology and medicine. Why must we assume that if women arent participating as much in a certain industry that there must be something preventing them from doing? Why do we care that all positions, well nice saf…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 03:43 AM
5

Why did she drive a car? It had been invented by a man! Why did she drive down the road? It had been built by men! If this were truly a manless trip, she needed to come up with an entirely new form of locomotion bevause planes, trains, ships, and cars were all invented, built, and maintained by men. Her road trip should have provided her with all of the evidence she needed for her query. Yes, by god, woman, you need men.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:31 PM
4

Then, in a couple years, they’ll come out and they’ll stop starting wars. They’ll put the toilet seat down. They won’t cheat. They’ll stop lying. It’ll be a much happier world. Let the women run things for a while. Because as we all know women never cheat, they dont lie to their partners, and they never want men to go off to kill their enemies. Never! I would really love to see an all female society, i would love to see it slowly break down and go crazy. I'd love to see all of the women who stea…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:21 PM
7

What makes you think that women had absolutely no power whatsoever in 1985?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:08 AM
2

Yes I'm pretty busy too and working on an other book, but i like the idea of a google doc.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:39 AM
3

I'm a writer, I'm down to collaborate.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 05:37 PM
4

There are stories of “harassment” where they never even ask guys to go away. What the actual fuck? There are stories of “rape” where they never tell men “no.” So im like “how can he know he’s a rapist?” Yeah the reaction is always, "I shouldn't have to! He should know by my incredibly subtle signals!" I get it because as a woman I 've felt the same things before myself. But then I've also been on the other side where I didnt pick up on a guy's subtle cues that he wasn't interested in me. It's a …
/r/MensRights01/07/19 11:10 PM
1

Obviously fake as we all know up until 60 years ago, women couldnt read or write or voice an opinion at all without their husbands beating them while their neighbors goaded him on. /s
/r/MensRights01/07/19 07:46 PM
4

Fans see this as Keanu being respectful of women." Respecting women apparently means to never, ever touch them unless you're married or dating. No such rules for women touching men though, teehee! She can grab whatever she wants!
/r/MensRights01/07/19 07:39 PM
2

Woman: I dont feel like I'm pretty enough. World: No!!!!! No woman should ever feel that way! Every one of you is absolute perfection just the way you are! Never doubt it! Man: Am I ugly? World: Ugh, yes. Yes, you are. You should probably work on that.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 07:30 PM
4

Thanks for writing that out, that is very interesting. It mirrors a lot of what I see in the feminist movement when there is a lot of infighting about issues. It often seems like feminists as a group can really come together on what they dont like and what they dont feel falls under the definition of a feminist. I think one of the worst messages conveyed from feminism/grrlpower to women, whether intentional or not, is the mantra of "I should be able to get whatever I want and whatever I want is …
/r/MensRights01/07/19 07:00 PM
19

Why are you certain that women wanted acknowledged full legal autonomy back then? Actually, single women did and it was only through marriage that a woman forfeited some of her rights to her husband in order to gain privileges and protections from the law. Back in the early 1800s, women wanted custody of their kids after a divorce, and for a time, laws were changed so that both mother and father could appeal for the right to be the sole custodian. But then, laws were changed to default sole moth…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 04:43 AM
1

And also, women's access to power and authority in a society is not solely tied to their economic contribution. Women will be considered important to a society, and therefore have the power to manipulate it toward their will, through their reproductive importance- particularly that this makes us view them as highly valuable, essential to keep safe from harm, and the most important group to survive in a dangerous situation. Women's issues are largely centered around their intrinsic tie to their r…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 03:33 AM
1

And women took part in the work that their husbands did in agricultural societies. Everyone in the family worked because jobs mainly took place in the home. "Blacksmith Schwarz says it is important to consider the woman's role in a family business: "It is just that—a family working to produce an income. In periods of sharp increase in demand, any able-bodied member of the family may be involved in making the business successful. Including women." "Male or female, a prospective guild member had t…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 03:13 AM
1

If women hunted the same as men, why are men significantly taller, stronger (especially in arm strength), and faster? For example, male and female Gibbons engage in pretty much all of the same activities including fighting and they have extremely low sexual dimorphism. The sexual dimorphism of humans suggests that they did not engage in similar activities, particularly ones that would select for an increase in muscle mass, height, and physical agility in males.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 06:21 PM
3

If they're gynocentric woman pedestalizers, yes. If they look at history solely through the lens of "women would never choose this or want this" when it is entirely possible that they can want something if the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. For example, look at how feminists frequently want to place blame and responsibility on men. Even in our current society today where there are no legal or social mandates for women to be under the control of their husbands, husbands will frequently be b…
/r/MensRights30/06/19 06:07 PM
1

Women want bad boys who are sane, empathetic, and rational towards them. They don't care if they express those attributes to others, in fact they'd probably prefer the man didnt until after the woman comes along.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 11:51 PM
3

From the dawn of time, men have prioritized and rewarded certain traits in women and women have prioritized and rewarded certain traits in men. Groups also were affected by what worked best for survival for the whole. The things that worked best resulted in many of the generalities we see throughout societies worldwide today. So basically I blame evolution.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 11:36 PM
3

Thanks, it's a pretty obvious theme when looking at women's fictional stories.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 04:09 AM
19

Maybe she needs some bad act on his part to give her some claim of moral superiority? Bingo. Examining Women's Fantasies: Why Do They Love Bad Men? "One of the most interesting reasons women find bad boys attractive is because of the psychological manipulation it allows her over him, at least, theoretically. In the typical plot of a female romance novel, the bad man meets the good woman, is instantly attracted to her, seduces her into a relationship, then does a Big Bad Thing which makes her end…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 07:36 PM
5

Before the baby is 1-month-old, a man who wants to opt-out of fatherhood would sign a document that states that he "has no desire to be a part of the child's life in any way, will not ever be able to seek any type of access, and will not pay money." Presumably she thinks he would be cut out completely, even financially.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 07:03 PM
19

"It's a choice for her between two difficult, life-changing options. She can't just choose to opt out. If she chooses not to continue, she has to go through a medical procedure which can have on going health or emotional consequences," wrote BanginChoons. And him having no choice in the matter at all has no resulting emotional or physical consequences on him. Nope, the thought does not even occur to this commenter! Women get to terminate pregnancies because it’s wrong to force anyone to bear chi…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 05:29 PM
11

fuckability mandates Hahaha! Ah yes, because men never have to spend money to get sex or appear attractive. As we all know women often just open their legs to let any man they see have a go. Things like BMWs and Mercedes, Marcus and Neiman suits, Rolexes, mansions, or the ability to take her to a 5 star restaurant for dinner- oh these cost nothing to mascara, tampons, and razors. Men sure have no idea what it's like to have to spend money to attract a woman to them... Goldiggers don't exist beca…
/r/MensRights26/06/19 06:26 PM
7

Oh no, everyone knows that if a certain number of people accuse someone else of something, it definitely means they did it. I'm sure women will understand if we bring back witch hunts and above 10 people accuse a woman, that certainly means she's a witch and should be hanged, no further evidence needed.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:18 PM
2

Not sure if the video brought this up but I notice the women in these photos are touching Keanu and I imagine they did not ask for his consent. Double standards, much?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:43 AM
3

Thus providing strong evidence that victorian era dictates about how women should be treated did not come from patriarchal men but women insisting on such practices themselves.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:37 AM
1

You thought you were being hyperbolic. 66 reviews giving it a 4.5 star rating overall, #116 in Fantasy Romance. Seems like a lot of chicks dig orcs... "There are some truly hilarious moments in this book AND some great, big, hot sexy times!" Yikes.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:24 AM
56

When he worked more, she had to "put aside her career goals" in order to raise the kids, cook, and clean. Now that she works more and he stays at home, he gets to "do all of the things that she wanted to do as a mother." My god, it's almost as if there are downsides to every choice, people!
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:06 AM
3

Men certainly enjoy it when they can lay back and let the woman do the work. That's all complaining about "laying there like a starfish" is about. The woman is probably moaning and gasping her delight, and men would just like it if she would also include some more movement.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:42 AM
1

She wants a vampire or a werewolf or a werebear or weredragon. He still puts his life on the line for her, is uber strong, and has that sexy bad boy danger she craves. Knights in shining armor are a little too much like white knight beta soyboi cucks...
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:18 AM
8

Women are beaten, raped, and murdered DAILY because of misogyny. Anything bad happening to a woman apparently can only be because of misogyny, according to feminists. Man kills a woman to get her money? It's really because he was a misogynist! Man hits a woman because she hit him first? It's really because he was a misogynist! Man rapes a woman because he wanted to have sex with her? It's really because he was a misogynist! (In case someone thinks I'm excusing or minimizing rape, let's all think…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:07 AM
2

I’ve always been turned off by macho, overprotective men and have no interest in dating one who doesn’t appreciate my strength. That being said, I like the comfort of knowing my guy is standing by my side in situations where I’m out of my depth and that does NOT make me weak. You must think of me as a strong person, and you must never imply that I am weak, but you must also save me when situations occur that I am not capable of handling. I’m happy to have a guy stick up for me in times of need, …
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:15 PM
1

That's good advice, I should start asking people more what they think and why. I do find that a lot of feminists aren't interested in discussion, but maybe that would change if I used a different approach.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 01:58 PM
1

I read your debate with them too. The "it all leads back to the patriarchy" argument is so common and so annoying. Especially because they don't try to substantiate it with facts or reasoning, to them it is as apparent and true as 2+2=4.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 01:54 PM
2

Oh I don't think they will either, I just wanted to put it up because their argument is what every feminist thinks: that feminist theory should be thought of as logical and unquestionable as basic math and science.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 05:02 AM
2

Scorning women for having sex is a real problem and it is imperative that feminism work to dismantle society's sexual double standards. Pointing out objectification is not the same as shaming women for being sexual, which is why feminism distinguishes between the objectifier and the objectified. I love seeing that rationalization hamster spin. "If a woman wants to present herself sexually, that is a wonderful and amazing thing that needs to be celebrated to the ends of the earth. But the second …
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:14 PM
5

That estimate is too low, or doesn't account for the times women will go on a date with a guy knowing that she's not really attracted to him but wants to feel desirable, show status of being able to go on dates, and get free food. There may now be a larger portion of women who consciously go out with a guy solely for the food, but plenty of others have been doing a similar thing for a long time.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:55 PM
3

A lot of people here are former feminists or at least believed much of the feminist mantra. Being as it is a part of their identity, it's unlikely that they'll accept an opposite view of things all at once. Most likely, some of their beliefs may be chipped away by valid arguments, until they can accept that the entire ideology was bogus. Wouldn't be a bad idea to have a specifically titled place for them to go, though.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:17 PM
4

It's not that you're necessarily dying, it's that someone placed you in a position where your life is at risk and dependant on the person who put you in that position. In the vast majority of cases they did this with full knowledge of this possibility and did it anyway. You were the one who had no choice in the matter, it is far more the case that the other person hooked you up to them for your life support then wants the ability to unplug though it will mean your death.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:31 PM
1

'Twould that all feminists realize such ironies.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:09 PM
3

Their own ageism is showing since they apparently think marrying a 45 year old man is a terrible thing. Also, 40 year old men can largely only marry (attractive) younger women if they have substantial wealth, which essentially means she will marry him for his money. Women absolutely have access to this kind of relationship, something any woman with money considering a relationship with a less wealthy man is fully aware of- what if he's just dating her for her money? Shockingly, they don't seem t…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:04 PM
3

Yes I am highly interested in their idea of what respecting women means. I particularly would like to compare it to how women typically treat men, especially ones they aren't attracted to.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 06:54 PM
1

Patriarchy means that males statically hold more authority. That's it. I think the ideas of "authority" and "power" as defined by feminists are limiting and inaccurate. It may be true that men are statistically in more positions of power and authority, but it matters far more what they do with that power. If the vast majority of society is far more concerned with female welfare, safety, health, and just basic happiness, then that's going to be a large source of power for women to hold over socie…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 08:49 PM
8

Yes I think patriarchy theory- the theory that our entire civilization and culture has been created by men and largely for their own interests- is extremely unrealistic. It relies on the idea that at some point in history some powerful man decided to implement gender roles that were unnatural and less productive, yet they were copied over and over again until nearly the entire world adopted the same system. Somehow this continued for thousands of years until the last 200 years or so when women f…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 03:58 AM
6

Yeah she didn't say it in the way of "hey fellow feminists, people are starting to associate us with hating men. That's a really bad thing, we have to stop doing or saying anything that might be misandrist!" She meant, "OMG, you guys, stop calling us manhaters just because we think the male population should be reduced to 10%." She largely talked about female issues in that speech and the only times she brought up men was to imply that they only receive hardship for acting feminine. She demonstr…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 08:14 PM
10

I think most feminists believe that toxic masculinity can be perpetuated by both genders, however they believe it was conceived by the patriarchal notions of men so therefore it is largely men's responsibility to fix.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:56 PM
67

According to feminists: Toxic masculinity: harmful stereotypes about men originating and reinforced by men. Women have nothing to do with it! Misogyny: harmful stereotypes about women originating and reinforced by men. Women have nothing to do with it!
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:50 PM
28

We gave women the ability to lessen the impacts of unplanned pregnancies and then are shocked when they employ it carelessly.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:35 PM
3

Because unlike how feminists like to frame themselves, they don't actually represent all women's interests.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 12:43 AM
2

You're right, my bad.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 06:26 PM
6

From the song Him and I: "Ever catch me cheating she would try to cut my dick off" There's a girlish giggle that plays after that part. I don't recall a song with a woman singing about how if her man found out she'd cheated, he'd cut up her vagina and then he laughs teehee about it. Funny how they've never made that one before.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 06:00 PM
1

How many women are there who have brought these things up with their husbands, pleaded with them, and he refused to participate? Was there any possible reason for why he might want to place those concerns on her shoulders, such as him having a more stressful, time consuming job and her having a lighter workload despite both working full-time? You said in your first comment that there were a lot of husbands like that, then you accuse me of making a blanket statement?
/r/MensRights17/06/19 05:51 PM
18

You say "expected", I say they're reinforcing it because they want it to be done their way. I wonder how those women are trying to divvy up those responsibilities, if they are. Are they actually talking with their husbands and saying, "I need you to be responsible for this and that, and I'll take on these" or do they just complain about how it all falls on them without actually doing anything to try to fix the situation? This reminds me a lot of Jessica Valenti complaining about how it's so burd…
/r/MensRights17/06/19 03:21 AM
2

You guys, it's really simple: in order for a movie to not be sexist you need all of the female characters (which should be most of the important characters) to be kick ass strong independant women who just go around saying sassy things to the male characters, who will all be dumb perverted jerks, and frequently beat them up just to show how strong women are. Female characters will never do anything for the male characters and the male characters must be willing to do everything for the female ch…
/r/MensRights16/06/19 07:19 PM
1

Most women seek that, at least subconsciously. Examining Women's Fantasies: Why Do They Want Emotionally-Distant Men? Examining Women's Fantasies: Why Do They Love Bad Men?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:23 PM
1

A lot of women get power and attention from portraying themselves or seeking the position of a victim. It gets them sympathy and adulation, it makes people want to do things for them or give them things. Look at the Me Too movement and feminist theory in general. It is all about women gaining power through claims of victimhood. So some women seek out abusive men because they use his abuse as a way to solidify their martyr status. Another thing is that some people will seek out a controlling part…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 05:18 PM
3

No it's that whatever a woman wants must be a moral thing whatever the action is because women are inherently noble and just creatures. Men are naturally immoral and so if the thing he wants isn't approved of by the woman, it must be an immoral thing.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 04:52 PM
1

And there was indeed a time when it was more awful for women. But it wasn't. There was never a time when women were forced to give most of their money towards the upkeep of their children and ex-husband while rarely or never seeing their children.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 03:41 AM
1

The right sees women as angels, the left sees them as sex goddesses.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 10:44 PM
13

I agree, every person has the right to have an opinion, just like I believe men can have an opinion on abortion. I said the phrase to make fun of those who insist, "no uterus, no opinion."
/r/MensRights03/06/19 01:43 AM
7

It doesn't get any clearer than this. Unfortunately, I bet any feminist would never tolerate the idea that this trend could stem from increasing disparities in the legal rights of men and a constant societal mantra that tells them they're the worst creature to walk the planet. Instead, they will insist that this is an aspect of toxic masculinity where men just can't handle strong, independant women and their lack of patriarchal control over them.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 05:29 PM
71

No penis? No opinion.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 05:21 PM
7

True, although many steps are in place to ensure baby is matched with the right mom. They put a wrist bracelet on the baby with mom's name pretty quickly after birth so that there aren't mix ups. But still, they do happen rarely. Theoretically, it would be a great way to get paternity testing in under the guise of dna testing for both parents. But we already know society is aware of this problem, it just doesn't care.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:07 PM
16

Ah, what a horrible policy to married men since there are so much worse repercussions for them.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 04:08 PM
4

Was this in the U.S.? This definitely didn't happen with my husband the two times I gave birth, the 2nd just last year.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 03:44 PM
58

Test at the hospital at birth. Mother is sure the baby is hers, father needs the same assurance.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:24 PM
2

Roosh V’s freewheeling forums had encouraged would-be pickup artists to trade tips about psychologically manipulating women into casual sex. PUAs give men tips on how to act in order to make themselves more attractive to women. The only thing women hate about it is that it goes against the typical advice of "just be yourself, be sweet, flatter her, take her on paid dates, put her on a pedestal, treat her like a princess." Roosh V's advice is "stop grovelling, be confident, ask her about topics s…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 03:18 AM
3

I agree with you and I think it's one of the reasons why society was the way it was in the past. Although women have stricter standards for what they consider physically attractive in men, in terms of dating women are willing to trade down a little in a guys looks if he has higher levels of wealth, status, and masculine traits. A society that promotes these traits in men will essentially ensure that women are capable of finding more men attractive. It's really a knife in the heart for the idea o…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:34 AM
3

Well, civilization didn't demand women to go fight against an attacking army since the dawn of time, now did it? It didn't demand that women be the ones to sacrifice themselves anytime some dangerous threat occurred so that men and children could go on to live. But it did for men. Society also never demanded that women be the ones to engage in work, most often hard labor, to singularly support their husbands and children. But it did for men. How many women would like the deal where they go work …
/r/MensRights31/05/19 06:34 PM
5

she quit her job. "In 1992, MacKenzie worked for Jeff Bezos at D. E. Shaw, a New York City hedge fund.They married in 1993, and moved to Seattlein 1994." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacKenzie_Bezos She quit the job where she worked for him in order to move across the country to, wait for it, continue working for him?! Gosh, what a sacrifice!
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:46 PM
12

"Married people are happier than other population subgroups, but only when their spouse is in the room when they’re asked how happy they are. When the spouse is not present: fucking miserable." The data was misinterpreted to mean 'when spouse is present in the room' when the category really meant 'spouse living in house' as opposed to being married but spouses not living together as in the case of military deployment, etc. What's hilarious is that the data shows higher levels of happiness in the…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:24 PM
1

1) when women display themselves in a sexual way that appeals to men, it drives down the price of female sexuality and gives men less incentive to earn sex from women. 2) women don't want men to have any standards for what is considered sexy and beautiful for a woman. When women's looks are in line with men's preferences: slender with an hourglass figure, they will rail against it.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:07 PM
39

Women have higher risk-aversion and paranoia. Just because they are afraid of something doesn't mean it's an actual risk. Think of hypochondriacs and other people with higher levels of paranoia. It may be hard to live a life like that, but the whole reason they are experiencing a psychological disability is because their fears are unreasonable. They could experience a normal life if they accepted the unliklihood of those fears. Not only that, but women are far more likely to engage in the kind o…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 04:35 PM
5

every unwanted pregnancy is caused by men ...And women who agreed to have penis in vagina sex, understanding that this might cause an unwanted pregnancy. Perhaps this should be the male sex strike: don't give her the D in her V, no matter how much she wants it. Insist that you don't want to chance an unwanted pregnancy and so other forms of sex must be engaged in. Call them on their bluff.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 04:01 AM
1

Seriously! That was my biggest question. Is she the granddaughter of Michael's Italian wife in The Godfather? 'Cause that woman had no nipples, either.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:01 PM
2

But you see women will be rude and destructive in good ways, and boys can't be good so that's why they can only sit still and be quiet.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:54 PM
1

Never doubt what patriarchal males will do to cover up their actions condoned and upheld by the patriarchy...
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:51 PM
12

I've seen the one for girls. It was like "feminist baby can be loud... Feminist baby can be gross... Feminist baby takes what she wants." People criticized it for promoting rude behavior.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 06:53 PM
19

The woman had no choice in the matter, I'm sure. He clearly forced her to pose nude, the fact that she's smiling in it means nothing at all. The caption of "I wish you were my big toe so I could bang you on every piece of furniture I own" could have only been written against her wishes because no woman would ever want that said to her, men simply insist on saying it that's why it's a popular saying. He's probably a rapist and she's a sex traffic victim, that's the only way this situation could e…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 06:44 PM
3

I get tired of the "dress codes sexualize innocent female students!" hysteria, too. When I was a teenager in high school, I was most definitely wearing short shorts and spaghetti strap tanks to attract boys. Girls like to insist that it's only because it's hot outside, but I notice no matter how hot it is the boys are still wearing knee length shorts and shirts with sleeves.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:59 AM
8

I particularly see this in regards to domestic violence. Women are given understanding and sympathy when they hit their partners, even when they hit their children. Men have a zero tolerance policy.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:49 AM
1

The worst thing feminism teaches women is to eschew responsibility and instead complain so that someone else does it for you. I noticed this tendency in myself whenever I had a problem, I spent time grouching about it, how horrible it was that it happened at all, and thinking that it was really the responsibility of someone else. Now I just immediately ask myself, "what can I do to resolve this?" Made my life a lot easier and happier.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 07:56 PM
7

Bart and Lisa Simpson Modern Family has 3 main kids: boy is dumb, older girl is dumb but popular and pretty, younger sister is genius nerd. Harry Potter, though not about siblings, also follows this trope, the boys are far less intelligent than Hermione who is a genius nerd. I think there's definitely this implicit rule that there must be at least one supersmart girl.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 07:48 PM
2

Many reviews for 50 Shades of Grey call Christian Grey the perfect man. Many women also liked The Joker in Suicide Squad. And their romance fiction is filled with love interests that are criminals and dark crestures like vampires, werewolves and the like. Apparently it's okay for women to idolize evil male characters, but men are not allowed to.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:38 PM
2

It's really annoying how so many women refuse to take any agency for all of the knowledge we now have on how reproduction occurs especially for their bodies. Don't allow a man to cum inside you and you won't get pregnant. There are many ways to have sex that don't involve him ejaculating inside of you. Take your pick of them. Voila! You're free to have sex without resulting unwanted pregnancies and you don't have to pay a single cent for birth control! Win win!
/r/MensRights10/05/19 04:41 AM
1

In theory, the rulers of western society are the voters. Far more than this are the ideals people uphold, the instincts we have, and that the majority want to implement these in society. In comparison, voting rights or the gender of the rulers matter far less. If the majority of a group of people care greatly about children and have dominant instincts to protect and provide for them, then the fact that children don't vote and also have no children representing their group in politics doesn't mea…
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:26 AM
1

The differences arise from differences in biology and evolutionary survival strategies. "One theory about why male seahorses carry the babies is that this gives the species the ability to create morebabies quickly. The female deposits all her available eggs into his pouch when they mate, so she needs time to make more eggs. ... The male can deliverbabies in the morning and get pregnant again the same day." Humans did not develop this same reproduction style, therefore we do not have millions of …
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:33 PM
2

It's criticizing whenever a small amount of men can access female privilege, like pointing at uber rich or famous men who got light treatment from the courts. Just because they exist doesnt negate the fact that the vast majority of men are marginalized by the justice system, and particularly doesnt negate that a woman of equal status would get far lighter treatment. Criticizing "Himpathy" is criticizing that we might ever empathize with a man over a woman. According to feminists, we shouldn't ju…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 04:16 PM
1

My son and daughter fight a lot – not just bickering but full on noisy fights that often get physical. Name calling, hitting, kicking and lots of time out and punishment. I love my kids so much, but they can be a handful and they weren’t like that when I was with my husband. Wait, so children handle emotions better when they are intact families and their biological father is present? Who knew! He left me for a woman he met through work and left me and the kids feeling so upset and traumatised. A…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 03:18 PM
2

Breastfeeding has a complicated history, after formula was created it was pushed as the best thing for babies and breastfeeding rates declined. It was only after a push for going back to more natural methods in the 60s and 70s that breastfeeding rates rose again. Much of the push now is getting people to understand that there are significant benefits to breastfeeding and isn't just about a choice between equal methods of nutrition. To me it's comparable to promoting natural childbirth vs medical…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 05:35 PM
2

"Men are stronger than women." "Misogyny!" "Let's allow transwomen to compete in women's sports!" "Misogyny! Men are stronger than women!" "Men are less valuable than women." "Huzzah!"
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:54 PM
1

Video recordings seem to be the only way to go, but i kind of think not a lot of women will be down.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:43 PM
2

The act of breastfeeding stimulates the release of oxytocin in mothers' brains, improving happiness levels and strengthening their bond with the baby. I would have been tired a lot more often if I had formula fed my babies because I would have had to do so much more work: cleaning the bottles, making sure I always had fresh formula wherever I went, staying awake during a feeding to keep from choking the baby with the bottle, not to mention the cost. With breastfeeding, I got to sleep whenever th…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:37 PM
1

Don't forget about these beautiful boobies
/r/MensRights29/04/19 04:27 PM
1

AFAIK with recent rape trials (the Ghomeshi cases come to mind), messaging has largely been scrutinized for post-coital reactions. It would be perfectly reasonable for there to be enthusiastic messaging beforehand even if a rape did occur, but you wouldnt expect a person who was just raped to continue to reply enthusiastically or eagerly to their assailant. "I loved the way you fucked me last night and I can't wait to do it again" would be a pretty solid indicator that the accuser wasn't raped.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 04:09 PM
3

How do you provide proof that informed, enthusiastic consent was maintained through out the entire sexual encounter?
/r/MensRights28/04/19 06:14 PM
2

Feminists: women are so peaceful and know how to resolve conflicts without the use of violence, unlike men. Also feminists: men should be castrated against their will.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 05:39 PM
15

Your generation also is still every bit enthusiastic about having some $60,000 destination wedding and promising to love and cherish forever so long as that can be as flexible as really only meaning 3 or 5 years, and as long as she always gets the kids, house, and a good chunk of his retirement.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 10:06 PM
3

Even in an arranged marriage between nobles, the parents would have had to consider the potential spouses' ability to get along together. A bad match isn't going to help sustain good connections between countries, families, etc.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 10:02 PM
3

"Being an arsehole baboon was not fucking tolerated." It's too bad so many human females tolerate and reward arsehole males by sleeping with them and seeking relationships and marriage with them, and despise and decline the advances of "nice guys".
/r/MensRights25/04/19 04:54 PM
2

Women receive benefits when they frame themselves as a victim. They receive attention, support, sympathy, affection, protection. So they have developed a knee-jerk reaction to call themselves victims. Men receive benefits when they frame themselves as an agent. They receive respect, admiration, attention, and attraction. So they have developed a knee-jerk reaction to deny ever being a victim. This is why if you ask a woman if she's afraid to walk down the street at night, she'll always tell you …
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:25 PM
2

The interpretation of the female characters in GoT seems to be that even though they sometimes do bad things, they're only doing so because of patriarchy. A lot of women like Cersei and frame her as a victim, rather than a selfish murdering bitch. I think George R. R. Martin did write the books with the intention of portraying female characters as every bit as morally ambiguous as the male characters, but the HBO show has diverged from the books and is absolutely intent on turning all of its fem…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 01:53 PM
2

It's really true. I can't believe how many times my nieces performed in an elementary school play that had some feminist reworking crap in it. They did Peter Pan one year and changed things so that one of the girl characters saved Tiger Lily but one of the Lost Boys tried to take credit for it. Just stupid attempts at indoctrination, but unfortunately it is very effective.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 04:24 PM
8

I'd probably be a mod if I wasn't a busy mom of 2 under 3 who only has time to make an occasional comment. But I don't think the genitals of the people moderating matter so much as their belief in men's rights.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 02:37 PM
2

Here's the link for the 14th century separation case, for anyone who wants to read in detail.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 07:46 AM
30

"It portrays men as helpless against their violent sexual urges." No, our culture admits that rape can happen due to a small amount of depraved individuals, and there are a few steps you can take to try to prevent rape, just like you can with theft, murder, etc.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 08:55 PM
2

Here are some tropes about men in women's stories: He only exists for her: the entire theme of most female written stories intended for a female audience is that of the male whose life and personality are completely overturned by falling in love with a woman. This is particularly made apparent by the male character's initial "badness"; he is rude and a snob (Mr. Darcy), a scalawag and a rogue (Rhett Butler), a blood thirsty vampire who desperately wants to drink hers (Edward Cullen), or a domina…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 08:45 PM
8

Theon was brutally tortured for a season or more. And had his genitals cut off, which was then played off for laughs with the sausage bit.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 04:25 PM
4

He implied that women find his power and status so attractive that they like it when he grabs them by the pussy. Imagine a famous, beautiful woman saying, "[when you're as attractive as I am], men will let you do anything to them, grab them by the dick, anything." Hell, a woman could even replace the dick part with "slap him in the face" or kick him in the nuts". You get it under that context, right?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 10:00 PM
5

Hillary Clinton wrote an article in the year she ran for president about how there should be no women in prison because women only commit crimes from victimization by men. There was no backlash by feminists or women in general, unlike when she claimed white women voted for Trump because their husbands told them to. That one she was made to apologize for. But no more women in prison? Why it seems all women are shockingly in support of that.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:59 PM
11

I love every time I see that response from feminists and women over completely inane things, and yet they so often claim that women know how to resolve things without violence or aggression...
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:52 PM
7

Stereotypes about women “include the notion that women are nurturing, submissive helpmates to men,” they write. “The idea that women can be sexually manipulative, dominant, and even violent runs counter to these stereotypes….” The result is that “perpetration is downplayed among professionals in mental health, social work, public health, and law, with harmful results for male and female victims.” The feminist interpretation of this is that women may sometimes be "sexually manipulative, dominant,…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:42 PM
1

Looksmax seems to be reaching your highest potential in your appearance. I think the idea is that some people at their very best can look like a 10 and others only up to a 5.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 10:10 PM
3

"She wears black turtlenecks! See, they're totally the saaaaaaaaammmmeee!"
/r/MensRights19/04/19 05:06 PM
4

The stupidity of her arguments are can be boiled down to: -men should never orgasm inside the woman so she never chances getting pregnant If this is really what she wants, the solution is very easy. Women should only offer blow jobs or anal to men.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 04:35 PM
1

Dear fellow women: ANY👏BODY👏FLUID👏THAT👏ISN'T👏SEXUAL👏IS👏GROSS👏
/r/MensRights17/04/19 07:29 PM
4

"Feel lonely in the relationship"= "he wasn't taking me out on dates, buying me jewelry, telling me over and over again how he would die for me, and otherwise treating me like the princess I am!"
/r/MensRights17/04/19 05:27 AM
2

"Men who purchase sex from people who offer it for sale totally deserve to be robbed!"
/r/MensRights16/04/19 06:49 PM
1

I'd like to believe that if more people were aware of these biases, we could confront them in the same way that society currently confronts feminist claims. If the movement can keep growing to a wider audience, if more men can start standing up to unequal treatment, maybe it could happen.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 05:40 PM
8

Hopefully they are universally derided as being pathetic, entitled creeps who expect the world to hand them relationships just for putting sex or niceness quarters into a man. Oh wait, that's not how the world is going to view them? They're going to receive sympathy and pity and discussed as a major problem facing women today? Well, alright then.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 07:59 PM
16

. A lot of boys decide early on that they are just too cool for school which means they’re more likely to be rowdy in class. Teachers mark them down for this. In anonymous tests, boys perform better. In fact, the gender gap in reading drops by a third when teachers don’t know the gender of the pupil they are marking. Wow what a great way to deflect blame for teachers who automatically mark down boys. It's because of those rowdy boys! Basically the message is: boys, be more like girls. How about …
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:46 PM
2

This is also a good source. Today, in America and many other Western countries, we focus primarily on how to elevate, promote, celebrate, and protect women. In other countries, there is just a different sense of how to do those things.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:02 PM
2

The original Sleeping Beauty was hard core. She only woke up after giving birth to a neighboring king's twins. The king met her while she was already unconscious on a trip and made regular trips to "spend time" with her. Then he visits, see she's awake and that they have kids, and bring her to his kingdom. His wife is not amused, but then is somehow cast as a villain and gets killed, leading to the "happy ending". Somehow gets cast as the villain? There's a reason why fairy tales have always bee…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 05:18 PM
8

It is feminist Hillary Clinton who says, "Women should never go to jail They never truly commit crimes. Men make them do it." It's feminist Katherine Spiller, executive director ofthe Feminist Majority Foundation and Ms. Magazine who says, "The whole issue of domestic violence, that's just a clean up word for wife beating. It's not girls that are beating up on boys, it's boys that are beating up on girls." It was a couple of feminists who thought upand brought about the Duluth Model which influe…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 04:53 PM
2

This kind of thinking has an intuitive appeal: It can be empowering to trust yourself and your instincts, especially when you’ve been told over and over that they’re wrong. Jessica Valenti, please remember these words you've written the next time you come across empirical studies debunking the wage gap. Or any other feminist myth...
/r/MensRights13/04/19 03:22 AM
0

"I cant be expected to say yes or no, I need a box to say it for me." -modern women
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:41 PM
1

But you see men who are fat are medically speaking unhealthy slobs who totally need 6 pack washboard abs before they can be acceptable to women. Women- real women, not those skinny bitches- are goddesses who only get better the bigger they are. /s
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:36 PM
3

They will spin it as "patriarchy is so strong that 13 year old boys can manipulate 33 year old women. It's not the fault of women, it always comes down to patriarchy."
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:30 PM
61

They believe corporations need at least 50% women on the board, but ideally 100%. Likewise they believe having a mother but no father can be even better than with a father. Afterall that's what January Jones says.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 04:17 PM
3

There is a corresponding holiday for men to give women chocolates called White Day. So if they're only wanting to do away with the tradition where females give men presents, they arent being pro-female, they're being selfish jerks.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 05:16 PM
3

Women: stop sexualizing breasts! Also women: if a man grabs my breasts, he deserves to die! Also women: sees nothing wrong with touching a man's chest without permission
/r/MensRights08/04/19 05:04 PM
6

"As the story goes, Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos met in 1992 when they were both employees at the New York City hedge fund D.E. Shaw. Jeff Bezos worked his way up to senior vice president at the firm, while MacKenzie Bezos, then MacKenzie Tuttle, worked there as a research associate. The two married in 1993, and a year later, Jeff Bezos told his wife about his revolutionary plan for an online bookstore that he would later name Amazon. "I'm not a businessperson. So to me, what I'm hearing when he tel…
/r/MensRights06/04/19 06:46 PM
3

but thats only happened once in the history of TV with I Love Lucy I used to think that too until i actually watched I Love Lucy and i think it's far more comparable to what you said about Married With Children, neither partner is showed as superior to the other. Lucy isn't dumb, she schemes to get what she wants and ends up with unintended comedic results. I Love Lucy was so popular with borh men and women because it portrayed a dynamic between husband and wives that would appeal to both demogr…
/r/MensRights05/04/19 04:30 PM
2

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/vio.2017.0016 This latter chart goes in to more details, for example that black husbands/ex-husbands in the 1970s were killed 40% more than black wives or girlfriends. https://images.app.goo.gl/qQ3FZvV93zbwP4Sa8
/r/MensRights04/04/19 08:39 PM
5

He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice. Those are facts. Women couldn't vote Women brought about prohibition without the vote, yet we are supposed to believe that otherwise women have had no say in the formation of laws throughout all of history. I'm sure things like alimony and lifelong marriage, the legal law that ensured men kept their wives equal to their social status in terms of lifestyle, laws that compelled men to pay for any necessities their …
/r/MensRights04/04/19 08:13 PM
3

It's not just housewives... Every person does these things. So every person deserves compensation for washing their own clothes... according to you. A job is a job because someone else is willing to pay you for a service you perform which is usually for their benefit. I can offer up a job of paying someone else to wash my dishes, do gardening, clean my pool, cut my grass, etc. I may get people to pay me money for doing something they think is worth paying money for, as in the case of patreon, in…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 09:59 PM
1

Re. how men view their own sex, or how society does, in one global experiment called the “Goldberg paradigm,” researchers asked men and women in one group to evaluate a particular article or speech supposedly written by a man. Then they asked a similar group to judge the same material, this time supposedly authored by a woman. In countries all over the world, participants rated the very same words higher coming from a man than from a woman. It's pretty common. This did not address my actual ques…
/r/MensRights31/03/19 09:56 PM
1

My point about women choosing to fight in war even if they had to dress up as a man to do it and face the danger of legal and social repercussions and especially in contrast to the typical Victorian woman archetype demonstrates that women are capable of going against social norms when they want to. Your viewpoint is that women (and men) are so influenced by the patriarchy that their decisions are never fully their own (except of course by those bastard men who initially perpetrated patriarchy- w…
/r/MensRights31/03/19 09:14 PM
1

Alright here are some larger data sets that display women's agency: Possibly 400 or more women dressed as men to fight in the Civil War. Prohibition The suffragist and anti-suffragist movements Now the top one is the most interesting to me because it goes decidedly against the feminine archetype which you keep insisting will inform all or most of female behavior. Youve said things like the reason why women didnt do certain things is because they just couldnt imagine a woman possibly doing so. I …
/r/MensRights30/03/19 09:05 PM
7

Feminism does not have a monopoly on gender equality or support of women's rights. It has specific beliefs about what gender equality is, what causes inequality, and how equality should be achieved. If you disagree with any of these beliefs, you should not consider yourself a feminist.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 04:41 PM
1

Where in the letter did they say that voting was too great of a burden for their delicate minds? Yes they do seem to think that men and women are suited to different things. You literally have to think of women as being less capable to deny them this right. And many women were raised to think that way. Hell, I have friends who are former Pentecostals who felt that way about their own sex. I wonder how many male friends you have who think their own sex is less capable, less whole than the female …
/r/MensRights27/03/19 07:10 PM
1

Haha what a rebuttal. What's funny is that I used to be a feminist until I read up on actual historical accounts. It changed my feminist fantasy of the past. You know who my favorite example is of a historical woman who demonstrated that women have always had agency? Murasaki Shikibu from Japan around the year 1000. She listened at the door while her brother received lessons in Chinese writing and through that learned it herself. Was she reviled for being a woman who knew Chinese or did she have…
/r/MensRights27/03/19 06:49 PM
1

it would be hard to overstate the power of a narrative that teaches one gender that they are genuinely inferior to the other and that this should preclude them from positions of responsibility How many women do we see now insisting that we must have a female president, we must have female CEOs, female scientists, etc. because an overabundance of men in those positions cannot be trusted? Also, there is nothing to suggest that women believed themselves inferior to men as the reason for not pursuin…
/r/MensRights27/03/19 12:35 AM
1

Writers, architects, poets, philosophers, painters, musicians and scientists , mayors, politicians, theologians, accountants, etc etc. do not involve hard labor or danger....so if women weren't oppressed...why were they excluded so thoroughly from these professions? Because there were less women in these areas, less great artists and musicians, etc. you are interpreting it as that it can only be from women being excluded. But people, most especially feminists, make the same argument about women …
/r/MensRights26/03/19 11:58 PM
2

One of OP's links up there (the one about women working as blacksmiths) also details that women could inherit their husband's master status within a guild after he died, so the social assumption appears to be that wives would learn enough about their husband's business and trade to be able to at least continue to oversee it after he died. Husbands would have looked to their wives as a partner and associate of their business and treated them as such.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 06:42 PM
1

OP wrote the first comment sarcastically.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:17 AM
2

You're welcome and thank you for being so open to new ideas. If you haven't heard of her before Karen Straughan, aka GirlWritesWhat, does a lot of videos about evolutionary psychology in application to men, women, and history. She was really the one to open my eyes to it. Her earliest videos like Feminism and The Disposable Male, Fempocalypse, and The Tyranny of Female Hypoagency are all really good.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 09:30 PM
2

I'm a big believer in evolutionary psychology, which posits that most of the traits we possess as humans are the result of the successful passing down of genes. For example, male tear ducts are larger than women's meaning it takes more for them to cry/women tears fall down more easily. This change occurs during puberty, so before then boys and girls had similar tear duct size. This results in the social norm that men cry less and are less emotional than women. People who really want to believe t…
/r/MensRights23/03/19 12:39 AM
7

I agree that there is no way to tell if the story is real or not. But that just makes the theme of it even more interesting. Women can craft a tale of raping a man to sell a story of a woman "realizing her worth".
/r/MensRights22/03/19 08:04 PM
10

Ah but you see, this woman is an incel because of the patriarchy- she was cheated on and now is seen as less attractive because of ageing, all things that only happen because of patriarchal male constructs of beauty. Male incels exist because, like, they live in their moms basement, and have neckbeards, and are overweight, all things that are just generally unattractive and totally unrelated to patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights22/03/19 07:58 PM
1

There were schools for women dating back to the 1700s in America, there were schools for women in Europe. If you were rich enough, you just hired a tutor or a governess for your children. I don't agree with her philosophy that men and women would be nearly the same if just given the same opportunities and I think modern society is all the evidence needed to display that.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 07:38 PM
36

It wasn't told for comedic effect, it was a female "empowerment" story. He didn't want to have sex with her and that made her feel sad because why wouldn't this jerk know what an amazing goddess she is? The tale ends with her realizing she'll never again sleep with guys who don't really want to sleep with her, because it's rape just too damaging to her self-worth!
/r/MensRights22/03/19 07:20 PM
4

"Or how Ray Rice knocking his wife unconscious morphs into, "Yes, but women do it too." Indeed they do—but neither with the consistency, nor urgency, nor lethality of men." Actually they are the majority of non-reciprocal perpetrators of intimate violence. You don't hear about it because men don't speak about it.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:24 AM
7

Not all females identify themselves by their usernames or begin all comments with "speaking as a woman, I feel...".
/r/MensRights19/03/19 03:14 AM
1

According to this chart from 2016 in China and Pakistan the female suicide rates are very barely over that of males, but the overall numbers are far lower than that of countries in Europe and the U.S. The numbers they list for Indonesia have far greater male suicide numbers and that is the case for the vast majority of countries. This states that men commit suicide more often in Iraq, with young people killing themselves at almost equal rates.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:38 PM
2

It's more akin to shoehorning any sort of women into any other sort of topic, just for the sake of one-upping, or trying to grasp at straws to prove that women were always equal to, or better than men somehow.. This is exactly the story behind Amelia Earhart... The woman who was flown "like a sack of potatoes" in a plane manned by two other men! But she got a ticker tape parade for this, met the president, wrote a book, and became a national sensation! How did that dastardly patriarchy not keep …
/r/MensRights17/03/19 07:36 PM
1

Oh I agree, she seems to be totally ignorant. She dares men to ask women who their fictional crushes are, pretty sure they would say Christian Grey or Edward Cullen who are both described as having perfect model-like physiques, not to mention being a billionaire or vampire...
/r/MensRights16/03/19 02:40 AM
2

She probably meant super bulky, like the Hulk, Vin Diesel, Arnold Swarzenegger, super huge body building type. Most women like lean but muscled, like you see with most other Hollywood actors. But hey, men also far prefer slender curves rather than anorexic pixie which many women idolize.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:57 PM
13

Talks about how women come in all different shapes and sizes and abilities... Specifically states fit dude's body was "amazing", and sees no contradiction there. Also, I'll be waiting for them to feature an article titled 'To All The Women Who Want Me To Buy Them Dinner But Won't Have Sex With Me' and the perspective is that these women do want to have sex with these nice men, it's just that society has shamed them into only having sex with bad boys who won't spend a dime on them.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:49 PM
1

Its popularity demonstrates how much women agree with it. One woman: "Men are solely responsible for unwanted pregnancies!" A large amount of other women: "OMG, she's so right! I love this perspective!" Maybe they won't put it into practice in real life ("you better learn to pull out perfectly or we won't have sex") but it's now a rationalization in their head to further condemn men, one that they believe is true.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:51 PM
3

I've concluded the same thing just by looking at literature from the past. Mr. Darcy looks down on Elizabeth Bennet's family because some of her uncles work- as attorneys! Not even as bakers or blacksmiths and such, but clearly upper middle class positions. When he brings this up with her, her response is, "you are a gentleman and I am a gentleman's daughter, so far we are the same." Jane Austen did not write her books with any female characters who wanted to work. ". In North and South by Eliza…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:38 PM
4

Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not but the emphasis was more that both married partners had conjugal rights to the other, that is, a legal right to expect sex with their partner. It did not give them the right to force sex, but they could take legal redress from lack of sex from their partner.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:16 PM
5

I've believed for some time now that classism mainly stems from female influence on culture. They are the ones to set rules about what is proper and improper manners, fashion, house decoration, all of which is supposed to demonstrate one's social class (and this applied even more in the past when it was breaking the law to dress better than one's station). Lifestyle also goes into that with, as you said, expectations of how a certain woman conducts her life in a certain social class: a woman of …
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:10 PM
3

Women did have a choice, there was always the option of working, but working-for either men or women- was looked down upon as a sign of being lower class. Everyone for most of history wanted to get to the point where they didn't have to work for a living, it's why the upper class put so much emphasis on marrying other families of money, because then you could get a new influx of money that you didn't have to work for. It's only today that we look down on people for having so much money that they…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 07:27 PM
9

Oh yes, I hate that one. Then the carnival episode where Mr. Fox tells her the mom she shouldn't try at some archery game because "women are useless at it" so she does it and is of course amazing. Ugh... Sometimes it seems like they take an anti-feminist stance, like when Daddy Pig's rugby shirt gets turned pink in the wash and it's okay for him to not want to wear a pink shirt. But mainly what I find annoying is all of the times they make fun of the dad's "big tummy" when that would never fly f…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:59 PM
1

If women really want to avoid pregnancy, they can just offer oral or anal to men they have sex with. If women don't like those options, they are 100% responsible for unwanted pregnancies.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:50 AM
2

This would be the case if this was some seen by no one article, but it's not. It's been shared by multiple news outlets and I've seen it come up on my facebook again and again. She was one woman who wrote it but a lot of women like her message.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:48 AM
5

I've shared this same information with a lot of my female friends, particularly the bits about women being able to work far more easily than feminism made it sound, and the reaction is usually like a disappointed anger. They really enjoy being able to use the "we were so oppressed!" card and to have someone explain that it really wasn't like that, essentially, takes away a power source for them. It's incredibly annoying because I just care about what's true and what's false, and their reaction t…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 05:15 PM
1

Well, I am a woman... It's kind of our thing.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 08:01 PM
2

Yeah newborns practically do nothing but sleep. When I came home from the hospital after giving birth, I just sat on the couch watching tv for several hours while the baby slept on my chest. Husband frequently played computer games during the first few months because he just kept the baby on his lap, sleeping.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 08:42 PM
22

Seriously can't understand why women don't get this. To believe patriarchy theory is to believe women were so unintelligent, so totally unable to negotiate or manipulate that they could be deeply oppressed for thousands of years until the last two centuries when things started turning around. And what was the great mechanism that allowed women to finally fight back against those evil male tyrants? Well they, um... talked about things, and they wrote books, and they gave speeches and had rallies.…
/r/MensRights03/03/19 03:42 AM
2

You did not read the description fully because it is not the boy who finds them, but she gives them to him deliberately as a gift at the end.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 03:26 AM
3

Sounds like Crazy Stupid Love where a 17 year old babysitter gives nude photos to the 13 year old boy she watches, and it's presented as totally okay. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crazy,_Stupid,_Love
/r/MensRights02/03/19 10:32 PM
6

This is what I see from female friends when they talk about feminism. They always say things like, "this is what feminism means for me" then give whatever definition or example they like. It's a very effective tool to get people on board so long as you keep the meaning broad and shifting.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 06:06 PM
16

You don't even need to look at female leaders, just look at normal women. How often are they in some kind of emotional fight with someone, most often another female? It would be like The Housewives of Orange County or Mean Girls but on a global level.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 06:01 PM
1

As I said, I believe most men I come across are good. But let's not forget that a lot of men treat women very poorly from the get go... I'm fortunate enough to say I was never assaulted as a child nor a teen but that isnt true for a lot of women I know. You seriously believe a lot of women were assaulted by men as children or teens... Yet you also believe that most men are good. Makes total sense. Rates of victimization are equal for boys and girls and female pedophiles are significantly overloo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/03/19 05:58 AM
1

It depends on how strongly the church or denomination is against sex before marriage. But the same churches who don't care about it also don't care about girls or guys sleeping around therefore aren't going to slut shame the girls. They still take the stance of "she only had sex because of your perverted desires, son." Getting pregnant will still work to put pressure on the guy.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 01:30 PM
3

Because the words cad, manwhore, fuckboi aren't used to shame men for their sexual behavior...
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:43 AM
2

It happens in a similar way in Christian or religious circles in the U.S. too. If the church strongly advocates against sex before marriage and the unmarried couple has sex, the church leaders will take the viewpoint of "you need to break up or get married." Suffice it to say, girls who want to get married, especially to a certain guy, can use this as a way to place pressure on the guy to marry them. Most people, if a girl wants to get married and insists she loves the guy, view the man as in th…
/r/MensRights28/02/19 10:15 PM
4

At least now when feminists try to portray women as always the victim, we can call them out for "objectifying" women.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:42 PM
1

I meant especially positions of power where formal laws can be made, such as judges, politicians, congress, senate, presidents, etc. These positions are mainly filled by men, but they will frequently cater laws to suit what the majority of women are demanding at the time.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:39 PM
1

As far as demonstrating facts that show systemic male oppression... You can show them irrefutable data, but the response will go "They only give advantage to women because it's about women taking care of children, which is a patriarchal construct" and "men are the ones in power so if it really bothered them they would change it." What it really comes down to is that although men are in more formal positions of power, they are still beholden to the expectations and beliefs of society. Women hold …
/r/MensRights27/02/19 08:48 PM
10

Yet 'stare rape' is a thing.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 04:38 AM
1

It is considered rape because he was "sloppily drunk" according to her description of his actions in the story. At least, most people feel that a woman being significantly drunk cannot truly consent to sex.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 07:42 PM
9

As the cab driver, he was the one in a position of power... /s
/r/MensRights06/02/19 07:37 PM
4

It's only by achieving top positions that men can shed some of their perceived disposability as well as gain basic respect. Women are born entitled to protection and respect for their reproductive ability, so they don't have the same biological impetus for reaching the top as men do.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 07:30 PM
8

Toxic femininity: -woman does something unequivocally bad. -other women (and men) insist that she not be judged or blamed and the thing she did, whilst performed by a woman, isn't truly a bad thing merely a choice different from yours. If same act is performed by a man, then it is always comparable to murder and the man should be punished as such.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 07:20 PM
1

I know, it's Slate, but that just makes me think it would be even more likely to be an inflated number. So the number they give is probably an upper bound estimate, rather than lowerbound. I just think people make too much of this idea of 'women used to die like flies from childbirth'. It's the same boogeyman people like to use as 'women were treated like chattel'. I mean how many female animals die from birth? It's a natural body process and if so many females died from it, no species would las…
/r/MensRights02/02/19 01:44 AM
2

Instead of sending them to jail for years for killing their children, let's just send them to a spa for a month! These women need pampering, not punishment!
/r/MensRights02/02/19 01:32 AM
1

So we can definitively state that you must be pro-choice if you want to call yourself a feminist. Gee, I wonder why they don't bring that up more...
/r/MensRights02/02/19 01:24 AM
6

"In the United States today, about 15 women die in pregnancy or childbirth per 100,000 live births. That’s way too many, but a century ago it was more than 600 women per 100,000 births. In the 1600s and 1700s, the death rate was twice that: By some estimates, between 1 and 1.5 percent of women giving birth died. Note that the rate is per birth, so the lifetime risk of dying in childbirth was much higher, perhaps 4 percent." Source Still, people tended to die for a lot of reasons back then. Remar…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 05:40 PM
5

If it's true that masculinity and femininity are used by all people then there is no need for it to be a gendered term. Everything could simply be identified as toxic behavior and good behavior. Why should punching your SO for cheating be considered masculine? You really think women don't become violent after they learn their boyfriend or husband cheated on them? The toxic thing about that is that we think it's appropriate as long as a woman does it to a man.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 01:57 AM
1

The point from bufedad's comment is that in order to present themselves as a sexually viable candidate, e.g. in order to be considered sexually attractive to women, men have learned to be stoic. Because when they have been emotionally open, women turn them down and dislike them. This is what pick up artists learn to gain success with women, and it apparently works.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:24 PM
3

you have to WATER your soil At least she knows she's dirt.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 08:04 PM
4

They really do have a way of seeing themselves as a victim no matter what the issue is. For example, women complain about men leaving the toilet seat up, the idea being that women never need to lift or put down a toilet seat for their bathroom needs, therefore they should never have to touch it at all. But lets imagine the genders were reversed and it was now women who needed to lift up the toilet seat in order to pee. Then their complaint would be, "Men, don't you understand how horrible it is …
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:35 PM
2

It's not science to pay attention to the rise in bodily temperature that signals exactly when a woman ovulates, so that she would know when that happens even if it were off from her expected calculation of ovulation? It's not that they don't work it's that humans aren't willing to perform them, or any birth control, with perfect usage. The same is true for the birth control pill, if women take them at exactly the same time everyday this increases its accuracy. But as typical usage rates indicate…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:15 PM
2

Worthless because women find them too hard to do to prevent pregnancy. Women have endless enthusiasm to do them when they want to get pregnant, even when that takes months or years. You'd think with their focus on bodily autonomy that women would prefer a method that involves understanding and patying attention to her body, rather than relying on a MANmade pill that they have to pay for, causes their body to disrupt natural processes, and has many detrimental side affects. These natural methods …
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:31 PM
3

Feminists are quick to point out the sexist trope that is women are "damsels in distress", but don't actually do anything other than pointing it out. They adopt it themselves as soon as it becomes useful to them: "When a woman is alone with a man she's terrified that he might beat or rape her, and there's nothing she could do about it!"
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:14 PM
4

No, no NO! Too much work!!! This seriously has been the reaction of women I've talked to about alternative natural birth control options. "You expect me to take my temperature everyday?" "You expect me to check my cervical mucous?" (This was on a pregnancy board where tons of women, in the attempt to get pregnant, checked their cervical mucous every time they peed and posted the results on the internet) This was my favorite: "You expect me to not have PIV sex for a week? How limiting!" (These sa…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:08 AM
1

Where do men get this desire to be masculine? Where do they get the idea that in order to get respect from society and particularly sexual attention from women, they have to be stoic, strong, powerful, rich, dominant, brilliant, etc? Surely, they can't get those ideas from women, who so frequently seek to have sex with, date, and marry such men. Women even write out their fantasies through romance novels about men who are stoic, strong, powerful, rich, dominant, brilliant, etc. Now I know femini…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 10:02 PM
1

I would add the extreme promotion of women in education and jobs. If every man suddenly had at least a bachelor's degree, this would decrease the whines about the lack of good men by a lot. But if all women also have at least a bachelor's degree or significantly more women getting higher degrees, you get right back to "why aren't there any good men around?" It's an uncomfortable aspect of women that they can't stand the idea of men generally having higher status than them, yet at the same time a…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 06:53 PM
3

I think girlwriteswhat in an interview summarized the situation best including the dysfunctional way we view it today: Karen Straughan: As far as I know, it’s still legal for a woman to rape her husband in Britain and the US. Here is what’s fundamentally changed in the West that hasn’t changed in places like Iran. If you look into what we would consider backward, patriarchal societies and their family law, both men and women have an expectation of sex within marriage. If the woman is incapable o…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:25 AM
3

Furthermore, the ability to have morally approved sex and avoid fornication or adultery was considered so important that a physical impediment to it, such as marrying an impotent man, was considered one of the few valid reasons for divorce- a true divorce, not just a separation. https://allthatsinteresting.com/impotence-trials-divorce
/r/MensRights06/01/19 11:10 PM
11

I agree but I am pleased that reading this probably placed white women (especially feminists) in the shoes of white men for a second. "Um, excuse me, just because I'm white doesn't mean I have only one perspective!"
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:45 PM
28

"If we women were in charge, there would be no workplace deaths at all because there would be no dirty dangerous jobs to work! If you men would just encourage us women to learn more STEM, we'll show you just how more advanced we are in it, and all of the technological advances we'll discover to replace those jobs, which you dummies couldn't even dream of."
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:34 PM
2

It's one of the foremost reasons I didn't vote for Hillary. Even a male feminist is more balanced than a female feminist because he will feel the need to pander to all women including conservatives. But female feminists will just advocate for what they want because they consider disagreement from other women to originate from internalized misogyny.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:26 PM
1

By the way, calling a woman sweetie is sexist and I am highly offended by your misogyny.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 12:15 AM
1

Ah, how wonderful- you support me because I'm a woman then! Hey can you support me by reading the scientific data from the CDC I just provided above? Or wait, should I just believe you, random commenter on the internet, that men are the sole perpetrators of rape? Hmm, this is a toughie...
/r/MensRights06/01/19 12:11 AM
1

I just gave evidence contrary to your assertion that men are merely raped by other men and you don't respond to it at all? You must not actually care about male rape victims...
/r/MensRights06/01/19 12:00 AM
2

"The CDC’s nationally representative data revealed that over one year, men and women were equally likely to experience nonconsensual sex, and most male victims reported female perpetrators. Over their lifetime, 79 percent of men who were “made to penetrate” someone else (a form of rape, in the view of most researchers) reported female perpetrators. Likewise, most men who experienced sexual coercion and unwanted sexual contact had female perpetrators." https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/s…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 11:51 PM
1

I caught that too.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 06:00 PM
33

Oh no see, men are naturally bad people so they need to smile and act pleasant all of the time just to assure others that they're not going to rape or murder them. But women don't do those things therefore it's an incredible burden to have to prove their niceness. Doesn't everyone know that women are wonderful?!
/r/MensRights05/01/19 05:53 PM
1

The new, feminist approved 'How To Recognize "Rape"' erotica genre.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 02:47 AM
3

Can't wait for these rules to be applied to erotic romance novels: "Christian Grey whisks me off on his bicycle to his 600 square foot apartment in what appears to be the not so safe side of town. Sure, it's not the greatest but what more can you expect from a 45 year old part time worker at 7-11? As we reach the door, he pauses and I think for one wild second that he might push me up against it and kiss me. Or maybe he'll lean towards me slowly with that look that tells me I'm his and his alone…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:11 AM
1

It's interesting she brought up the Prince Charming story which is by far the most popular story with women. I've been thinking lately that women like to think what they want is Anne of Green Gables, where Anne competes against her romantic interest Gilbert Blythe throughout their entire academic career. Of course the story ends with her becoming a teacher and he becoming a doctor so it falls into the guy with higher status trope anyway. It seems to me that women like to use academic and career …
/r/MensRights03/01/19 01:46 AM
3

Or another way to put it, women selected taller height and larger frames in men as well as a desire to use those qualities in protecting them. So they like tall men with muscles who are capable at fighting and particularly to fight for their sake. Those men survived long enough to reproduce and so did their children. Men go to war while women stay home. That's all the evidence one needs to know that males have an innate desire to protect females of their own group. Outsiders of that group, male …
/r/MensRights03/01/19 01:30 AM
10

Right? I wonder what her ideas of "respecting women" are: women should be allowed to display their sexuality in whatever way they want, but also if you look too long, you are objectifying and raping her all at the same time.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 07:08 PM
13

This is what we should suggest to women who claim they are afraid to say no to sex to men that are bigger and stronger than them. I can see the headline now: "Femimists tell women: stop sleeping with men who are tall, muscled, and have a dangerous vibe. Only have sex with men who are short, fat, and wouldn't harm a flea!" Then the next day: "Absolutely no women are feminists anymore!"
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:08 PM
1

I remember reading even just with the revisionist history that it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. She had two male doctors volunteer to prepare her for a whole year to get into medical school. And then they claimed that it took a year of writing letters to schools before being let in, I was expecting several. I like to use her and Arabella Mansfield as examples against the idea that women had to fight hard to get into previously all male professions.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:51 PM
2

The injustice that no woman has the ability to make a lifetime career from the planning, selection, and specialized locational arrangement of throwpillows- and be worshipped and paid as a rockstar for this- is one of the worst aspects of patriarchy that I can think of.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 07:03 PM
3

Yes and then fight him in the rain with your shirts off.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 04:11 AM
2

Yes because the children couldn't be taken care of by other family members such as grandparents, aunts and uncles, or god forbid the father while mommy goes to jail. I love how when people talk about the caregiving mothers do for children (under the threat of imprisonment or sharing custody after a divorce) it's always presented as a job no one else can possibly fulfill in the way she can. Apparently then all mothers become a combo of Mary Poppins and Maria from the Sound of Music, whirling arou…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:25 PM
11

Feminists love to claim that 'feminism isn't a monolith' when challenged about certain opinions in feminism, so what can be a feminist opinion?
/r/MensRights23/12/18 08:33 PM
22

You're forgetting about the emotional labor of remembering that the spice cabinet is out of turmeric- and that takes 4.5 hours to accomplish! Don't even get me started on how much goes into choosing new drapes when they go out of season- women should get a whole year off with pay equivalent to a neurosurgeon for that!
/r/MensRights23/12/18 06:01 PM
6

When women's life expectancy is closer to men's (still above but less higher than in other countries) the country is penalized on a "gender equality" scale by the WHO.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:58 PM
7

Well, I'll be the first to say it... Idris Elba raped me. Now who else on this forum did he rape?
/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:43 AM
3

You're right Hillary. The American presidency has overwhelmingly been sought by men, not women hence we have not had any female presidents. Wouldn't you know, the same reason applies for lack of female involvement in STEM jobs, dangerous jobs, etc.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:13 PM
1

I don't know about necessarily anti-feminist books, but it is well worth it just to examine actual historical documents that were pertinent to gendered laws and such. Blackstone's commentary on the law will give you insight into the laws that applied to husbands and wives. This is usually what feminists refer to when they claim that "women were the property of men" but that is a gross misunderstanding of the law. The reality is it tried to balance powers between husband and wife, particularly wh…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:52 PM
3

And don't forget Dennis the sociopath, yet to be serial killer.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:47 PM
7

You may be able to counteract their assumption firsthand by saying: "I hate feminism because it views women in a misogynistic way." This will, hopefully, surprise them and get them interested in why you think so, while at the same time letting them know you don't think less of women.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 09:55 PM
394

There's a strange dichotomy happening from our evolutionary roles. On the one hand, we feel endless sympathy for women having the reproductive role (pregnancy, childbirth, nursing) to the point of celebrating when they disavow it completely. But men voluntarily taking on the disposable role gets less sympathy and less recognition as being praiseworthy in the first place. I understand that it was precisely because the reproductive role wasn't voluntarily taken on by women that it deserved more sy…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 09:36 PM
1

Yes at first I was going to go with up to age 18 for children, but saw this link which placed children at 14 and below and thought that was more applicable.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 09:18 PM
3

There are more adults than children in every country in the world because adult groups cover a wider range of ages than children do. In Syria, children make up around 30% of the total population. The remaining number being equally divided between the sexes, that leaves 35% adult women.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 05:26 PM
3

if these women are that fed up with their men they should just fucking dump them instead of bitch on social media about their problems You don't appear to be well-acquainted with how women go about solving their "problems". Women round up the social bandwagon to shame men into doing what they like. Incidentally, another good example of this is the entire history of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 11:22 PM
16

You can see this reflected in the Titanic casualties and Syrian civilian war casualties More children died than women and no one really finds that problematic.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 11:00 PM
1

But it is in downtown New York so it still sets back Oscar about $1000 a month.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 10:37 PM
2

Women's power is to claim they have none and thereby portray themselves as vulnerable and in need of help. And it's very effective.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 06:36 PM
11

It's hard to know how much crime is perpetrated by females because they receive such light treatment from the justice system at all levels. If it is true, as one study found, that 85% of male prisoners would be free if they were treated as females are by the courts, then that also means that there would be far more female prisoners if they were treated by the system as men are treated. Particularly in the case of murder, women are more likely to hire out the job to a man. Just look at the women …
/r/MensRights12/12/18 06:28 AM
7

And when men do stop pursuing after the first no, the female reaction goes like this, quoting Henry Cavill: "Now? Now you really can’t pursue someone further than, ‘No’. It’s like, ‘OK, cool’. But then there’s the, ‘Oh why’d you give up?’ And it’s like, ‘Well, because I didn’t want to go to jail?’”
/r/MensRights12/12/18 01:55 AM
6

Seems like they tend to get screwed in divorce courts with alimony and child support payments. You'd think the 1% would do more to privilege themselves!
/r/MensRights11/12/18 10:28 PM
1

Have you read the book? It follows everything about the BDSM consent rules. He wants her to sign a written contract which outlines everything that she consents to before they have sex. Oh yes, he does ignore her pleas to not buy her an expensive car or clothes or things like that, but as far as sex he's always about consent. The only thing feminists can criticize about it is that it follows the typical female romance novel shtick of virginal woman paired with a super sexually experienced man who…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 10:24 PM
2

Or newcomers fresh off the feminist boat.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:44 PM
2

Anne Shirley (of Anne of Green Gables) lived on her own (with a bunch of female roommates) when she went off to college and then university. Jane Eyre lived on her own when she worked as a teacher. Tess Durbeyfield lived on her own when she worked at the D'Urbervilles and lived with a bunch of female roommates when she worked as a dairymaid. Why, it's almost as if everything you've heard about feminist history isn't true! Oh but these must all be books written about made up fantasy lands because…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:40 PM
2

It pretty much would already play out in the articles given suggestion. Women marry nice beta men who have significantly less ability to get women to sleep with them than their wives have to get a sex partner. So even if each partner has a hall pass, the woman will have far more ability to sleep around than the man does. She gets the benefit of marriage with its financial perks and a caring, stable father for her children but still she gets to sleep with sexy bad boys. The only final steps are t…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:23 PM
2

It's strange but looking into actual history says you're wrong. From a legal standpoint neither men nor women were allowed to cheat without it giving their spouse to separate from them (and yes for wives that still meant getting all of the money they required from their husbands). Check out Blackstone commentaries on the law for marriage. Strange how a society with far more sexual mores than we have today would somehow look the other way for all men to cheat on their wives. But there is a huge d…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 06:59 AM
12

Of course we know if the genders were reversed, men getting bored with the same old partner over and over would make them disgusting immature sex crazed perverts. When it's women that means it's completely moral and should be celebrated. How dare those old stuffy husbands hold back their wives' earthy sensuality and insatiable libido.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 01:36 AM
5

Most MRAs are willing to discuss women's issues but beyond the feminist ideas of patriarchy always being the origin of them. Many MRAs believe in the validity of evolutionary psychology and that this explains much of the differences between men and women, rather than social constructivism. Not that this would mean that we cannot change our instincts, but that it is where the instinct comes from. So when we see that women are generally risk averse and this transfers to them taking less risky jobs…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 03:37 AM
1

The expectation of men to pay for dates or foot the bill largely for the entire relationship does not stem from expectations of chivalry but a desire for women to see how much interest a man has in her (how much money are you willing to spend to be with me?) and assessing his financial ability (how much money can you afford to spend on me?). Hence many feminists find it difficult to not want to use this in their dating. It stems from a mating strategy, not patriarchy. (https://www.bustle.com/art…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 05:52 PM
2

I also found nauseating the part about "look at that girl begging on the streets! She has to because her father died and as we all know no woman is able to work under this oppressive patriarchy." Nevermind all of the female servants in the castle...
/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:41 PM
8

The show is usually considered fun and tongue in cheek. It's not serious or dramatic, like OP said the biggest problem of the main character is that she has to create more drama in order to hold onto the fame she wants. The only way the story can focus on that theme with the events is because it's a female character. We don't feel sorry for the man she killed, and we largely forget that she should be considered a murderer. If this were a tale of a man who shot his female lover do you think the s…
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:21 PM
2

There is a subreddit called FEMRAdebates where feminists and MRAs debate issues. I don't know how peacefully things are discussed there, but it kind of has what you're going for. You're kind of preaching to the choir round here, MRAs would love to openly discuss issues with feminists but are not given a chance by said feminists. We've heard their side of the story but they won't listen to ours. They dismiss any attempt to interpret the world through any other lens than patriarchy theory, thus th…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:31 AM
11

Women are told to view a man asking them out or complimenting them on a physical attribute as sexual harassment. Men would likely only view a woman legitimately stalking them as harassment. Even if they were working from the same definition, men would be less likely to report.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 09:46 PM
2

Whoever does the majority of childcare during the marriage should not matter because once the parents divorce the expectation should be that these duties must be divided from then on. Likewise, we would not expect that just because the husband was the breadwinner during the marriage, he must continue to be the main worker after the divorce (though courts frequently treat men as such). NOW has consistently shut down legislation for automatic 50/50 custody policies in divorces because of fear mong…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 07:32 PM
3

In their ridiculous mindset only men truly commit crimes. Women only ever commit a tiny amount of petty crimes because-drum roll please- men influence or victimize them. So if men don't commit crimes, that means crime doesn't exist anymore, and cakes are made out of rainbows and unicorns can fly us to the moon, etc.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 05:28 PM
18

Hurray! Female violence against males is so funny and appropriate!
/r/MensRights23/11/18 05:22 PM
1

What's their definition of creepy or sleazy and would they apply those same words and disgust at female characters who acted similarly?
/r/MensRights22/11/18 04:05 AM
2

You're right we should fight the patriarchy by seeing vaginas in everything. Trump Tower, bananas, the appearance of Sweden and Norway on a map... all are actually representations of giant swollen feminist AF clitorises.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 02:13 AM
2

A 'Q' looks like a flaccid penis emerging from a large scrotum, you need to de-patriarchify yourself further.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 08:20 PM
3

It's often portrayed as an acceptable event on t.v. shows for women to enjoy male strippers but men are cads for enjoying female strippers, even in application to bachelor and bachelorette parties. Example: Parks and Recreation (Leslie Knope's bachelorette party vs Ben Wyatt's, as well as in comparison to when character Tom Haverford visits a strip club).
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:20 PM
3

Um, you think there was a time when men could force women to have abortions? When did that happen?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:03 PM
2

I never knew 5th Law of Robotics was secretly January Jones...
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:57 PM
18

How could you consent? You were drunk!
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:47 PM
6

"But if your goal is to protect women at all costs from feeling bad about their choices—because you don’t think they can handle it, and they probably don’t know what they want anyway—then we already have a word for that," she wrote. "It’s not feminism. It’s paternalism. And it denies women a fundamental if unglamorous freedom: to not just make decisions, but to live with and learn from the consequences of their less-than-great ones." The word paternalism is from the Latin pater "father" via the …
/r/MensRights11/11/18 10:20 PM
3

We women don't constantly fear a man kidnapping us and ass-raping us until we die, and there is no "good reason" to do so. That sounds the same as when feminists claim that every time a woman engages in sex she's also incredibly afraid that if she said no the man would rape her. It's a scare tactic used to shame and silence men and it has no basis in reality. By your logic, every man is deeply afraid every night he goes to bed that his wife or girlfriend will cut off his penis while he's sleepin…
/r/MensRights09/11/18 06:43 PM
4

Or women's shorts that might as well be underwear.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 05:58 PM
66

Wait, the largely heterosexual female readership of People like square-jawed, macho, STRAIGHT men to fantasize about? Why gee golly, next you'll tell me water is wet!
/r/MensRights09/11/18 05:54 PM
5

It really demonstrates how far removed from reality women are because they've been told 'women can do anything men can do and they do it better' and believe it. They believe men oppressed women by a constant threat of force and because of that women were compelled to do anything men wanted, so how exactly are women going to turn about and do the same to men? Even if you were to look at it from the perspective of women holding all government positions and therefore voting to eliminate male rights…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 08:02 PM
1

Many here do believe that all waves of feminism were problematic, steeped in unfair treatment and attitudes toward men, and shirking responsibility. Suffragists saw no problem giving women the rights of a full citizen without the accompanying responsibilities placed on men (conscription, bucket brigades,etc). Some suffragettes were involved in white feather campaigns which shamed men for not appearing to have enlisted. First wave feminism also fought for automatic mother custody in divorces (cus…
/r/MensRights05/11/18 07:00 PM
3

Preferably written on stone tablets so the person has several days to change their mind.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 05:51 PM
30

This just highlights the problem that men are not responsible yet for preventing female drunk driving.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 05:47 PM
6

It's a "rape waiting to happen note", that's what it is.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:41 PM
8

Eating human flesh? Totally cool. But patriarchy? That's truly immoral...
/r/MensRights29/10/18 08:45 PM
3

But you see a woman can later say "Outwardly, I was like, 'hell yes, that's hot!' But in my mind I was thinking,'this can't be serious, can it? Tell me it's not serious!'" It no longer matters what the woman says at the time, it only matters how she later said she felt.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:30 PM
4

I wonder how many roles Keira Knightley has taken on that follow this rule. I seem to recall that in Love Actually, after her friend tells her he loves her, she kisses him without having asked for his consent. And you know what, just because someone tells you they love you, that doesn't mean you have permission to kiss them. Fairytales largely originated as female stories, as evidenced by the fact that they are still largely preferred by females today compared to males. If they were written by m…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 05:07 PM
2

Unfortunately what this may demonstrate is that feminism will only be defeated when it is shown as harming women.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 11:21 PM
4

There would be far more female criminals visible to us if they weren't able to use men to do their dirty work for them. Men do not have women willing to take the risk of performing a crime for them so they can only do it themselves. Women have options.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 11:40 PM
1

The clearest example I can think of to puncture their idea of patriarchy, particularly that it's men's idea that men are always down for sex, is how kings were treated in the past. If you were a king, no one touched, spoke, or even looked at you without your permission. I kind of doubt the only exception to that was in sexuality and the king was always down to have sex with whatever woman who prostrated herself onto his bed. On the other hand, which gender considers it to be a grievous offence i…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:07 PM
1

The clearest example I can think of to puncture their idea of patriarchy, particularly that it's men's idea that men are always down for sex, is how kings were treated in the past. If you were a king, no one touched, spoke, or even looked at you without your permission. I kind of doubt the only exception to that was in sexuality and the king was always down to have sex with whatever woman who prostrated herself onto his bed. On the other hand, which gender considers it to be a grievous offence i…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:07 PM
2

Victimhood porn, great term. It features frequently in female and whiteknight writing. We're very capable of seeing women and women alone as complete victims, no agency or responsibility at all.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 09:18 PM
1

This was another protection provided by the law of coverture where a woman could not be punished by the court, only by her husband and only by spanking or light whipping (acceptable methods we used to punish children until recently but even these became illegal to use on a married woman by the reign of Charles the II). Yeah I kind of think most people would prefer being spanked with a belt than having your ear nailed to a post.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 09:06 PM
7

"I was going to rob and rape her but then she made assertive eye contact at me and so I ran away screaming."
/r/MensRights03/10/18 09:35 PM
4

Only 32% of male first class passengers survived which is still significantly lower than the 49% of 3rd class female passengers who survived (not to mention the 97% rate for first class females). That is the lowest surviving percentage for females and it is 2nd class passengers for the lowest male percentage which is 8%. In 2 out of the 3 classes more women survived than children. http://www.icyousee.org/titanic.html
/r/MensRights03/10/18 01:52 AM
3

Men are bad for finding physical looks to be the most initially attractive trait for a woman to possess, you see. They should be like women, who are more moral, and find men most attractive for their inner depth qualities like fame, status, and wealth... /s.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 12:01 AM
1

I think the point may be that as the most vulnerable, the policy should have been children first, so that the lowest class children would have been saved before any first class adult woman was.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 10:35 PM
1

Imagine Henry Cavill holds open an elevator door for a woman. I'm inclined to think most women would take that as a possible sign of interest on his part. How would they let him know they're interested back? Smiling and saying thank you. Now of course this can happen as a basic social interaction between two people who have no interest in each other, but it's understandable that it can be construed as possibly meaning romantic interest. I'm pretty sure many women would be miffed if they held ope…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:23 PM
2

Incels are men who want to at the very least have the ability to sex with women, but because of things like less attractive physical looks and less sophistication in social skills are unable to do so. Hence the name Involuntarily Celibate. Women for the most part do not experience this because they always have access to at least a casual, no strings attached sexual encounter. Looks and social skills do not matter for a woman to get a man to agree to have sex with her. Tinder would not exist if t…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:04 PM
8

Interesting thought I had about this: superhero stories are highly valued by men, not because they are about a man who has super powers but rather because he is a man with super powers and uses them selflessly instead of selfish reasons. Most narratives about superheroes are about exactly this: the man is either born with or receives through some accident superhuman powers. While this is fantastic at first, he eventually sees the drawbacks that take place to his life, how it restricts his abilit…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 09:43 PM
7

The obese women of the fat acceptance movement sure seem to feel entitled to relationships and adoration for their "beauty" by society. But they get a whole lot more sympathy than incels do.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 09:13 PM
6

No need to even make an analogy. How many women would accept being called a rapist simply for flirting with a man? How many would accept that a man could feel "emotionally raped" because she asked him if he wanted to go out, have sex, etc? Women seem to have no concept that this could go the other way around.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:54 PM
11

As a mom, I can't tell you the amount of times I bring my kids to a playground and watch mothers yell and just become immediately irate and abrupt with their sons. It's always to boys and it's always from mothers. Granted, sure, boys do misbehave a bit more: they knock over blocks or run away from their parents or try dangerous stunts, but it's still no excuse to have this explosion of anger from the mother. And even with that, most often I see the mothers get irrational over behavior that isn't…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:46 PM
4

an analysis of the movie that says men are insecure and thus need to control women’s sexuality It's so indicative of the hypocrisy of feminism to me that this is the go-to criticism of men by feminists- implying that "masculinity so fragile" and essentially shaming men for experiencing insecurity at all. Because by doing so, they are demanding a traditional concept of masculinity: men cannot be vulnerable or insecure. Then they go on to wonder why men aren't allowed by society to express emotion…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 03:44 PM
6

We automatically assign agency to men and we assign lack of agency to women. A particularly demonstrative example of this is the pussy pass given to women when they commit even heinous crimes. Woman slowly drowns all five of her children? She just wasn't helped enough by society and this happened because of the immense burden we place on mothers. Man doesn't pay child support to his ex-wife because he can't even afford to pay for an apartment and food? Put him in jail, what a deadbeat.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 10:06 PM
1

It's pretty well summed up in the song No Scrubs by TLC. By the way, men, you too should not give the time of day to women who: a) catch rides with friends because they don't have cars b) are broke c) look like trash when you look like class d) is a deadbeat ass e) also walk at times because, again, they don't have a car f) lives at home with parents g) wants to get with you despite having no money h) can't spatially expand your horizons i) doesn't have the G's to please you and bounce you here …
/r/MensRights12/07/18 06:09 AM
1

A TV wife nowadays could easily make the remark of "one of these days, Mike, I'm going to cut off your balls." And the husband would laugh, then see her serious look, then look kind of worried. And the audience would laugh. That definitely wasn't the acceptable reaction from the wife in the Honeymooners.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 07:57 PM
1

I still remember "one of these days.... POW! STRAIGHT TO THE MOON!" -- but yeah, we don't get to see that any more. The interesting thing about this is that even though The Honeymooners played in the 1950s- the heyday of socially acceptable wifebeating according to feminists- it still only ever showed a man joking, and the audience understanding that it is a completely unserious threat, that he would punch her. Just saying that as a joke may be completely inappropriate today, but it's a far cry …
/r/MensRights06/07/18 10:04 PM
2

What matters is whether women wanted those things and therefore sought them out, rather than men ignorantly or hostilely placing those restrictions on them. You've been told that what women want is true equality, to be seen as exactly the same as a man, no worse no better. But then why do so many feminists, including Hillary Clinton, want to eliminate female prisons because in her words "women only commit crimes because they were influenced or earlier victimized by a man." She wrote an article f…
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:52 PM
9

When people say 'men dominated the past' they usually say it to imply that 'men dominated society, therefore society reflected only what men wanted and not what women wanted.' This should be obviously untrue because if men were able to do exactly what they wanted, why would they create things like alimony, lifelong marriage, the legal expectation to financially support your wife with no similar expectation from her, and the like. Not only is that important to consider, but far, far more illustra…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:38 AM
2

It's really not expected at all that a woman might stick her finger up someone's ass while she gives them a blowjob. It is an unconventional act, therefore more people are likely to ask before they engage in it in the same way that they might ask before engaging in BDSM or anal. It's pretty conventional and expected that people generally go from kissing, to making out, to removing their clothes, to touching body parts, to having intercourse. If either party wants to stop this expectation of proc…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 09:08 PM
2

What are women, anyway, except interchangeable machines for sex, work, baby-production, childcare and eldercare? What does this person expect people are valued for in society anyway? They mentioned work, is it wrong to value women for their ability to work now? Oh, right, we're supposed to raise them on a pedestal and bow down before their greatness but for no other reason than that they have vaginas. Of course, no one should expect that vagina to be used for having babies or sex. The mystic vag…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 12:55 AM
7

(the psychology behind what motivates men/women in sex offenses is very different) Let me guess... men do it because they were bored or evil, and even if they were molested earlier in life that's no excuse. Women do it because they were feeling unloved or emotionally unfulfilled and didn't you know they were molested earlier in life? That excuses everything!
/r/MensRights31/05/18 04:16 AM
1

Similar to the way that everyone desires to have sex and the reason they want to have sex is because it feels good. But the ulterior motivation behind wanting to have sex is the instinct to reproduce. It doesn't matter if you actively take measures to not reproduce, the desire for sex is the result of an instinct to reproduce.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 08:06 PM
2

I mean... the sentecing gaps in the justice system.... who is handing out those sentences? Men mostly. The combat draft? Legislated by men. Here's an example of how that works in the real world: Recently there has been a lot of discussion about verbal enthusiastic and consistent consent in sexual interactions, specifically that women have a hard time saying no even when they want to because they are so frightened of what men might do to them if they refuse. It is becoming more and more a social …
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:02 PM
10

Yup which is why high status men such as actors, politicians, sports stars, etc. can have essentially a harem of women in the form of mistresses and one night stands in addition to a single wife. There are just that many women who want to sleep with them. On the other hand, there are a significant amount of men now who cannot get a woman to agree to sleep with them except for paying a prostitute. Hardly any woman has this problem. Many women have a hard time getting a guy to enter into a relatio…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 04:23 AM
12

Imagine you have 10 women and 10 men and, instead of pairing off 1:1, all the women fuck the same guy. Or essentially, imagine Ryan Gosling amongst 9 other regular guys, and the ten women can choose whoever they want to sleep with. Most women will choose Ryan Gosling and only him. On the other hand, even if you have Megan Fox amongst 9 other regular women and 10 men can choose whoever they want to sleep with, most would choose Megan Fox first, but then still want to sleep with the rest. Women do…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 05:37 PM
1

I'm not saying it didn't increase, but that the amount of females working had been increasing steadily decades before that, as any chart and numbers show. You said previously that women jumped at the chance to work in WWII and they "entered" the work force en masse because they were finally given the opportunity to. This is obviously untrue because women had previously been working (30% of single white women in 1880 and much higher for women of color). Women have always had the ability to work w…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 09:26 PM
1

Then how could politicians have been representative of women if they couldn’t vote? They couldn’t have chosen them, right? That may be considered one form of lack of representation. Another form is that the politicians chosen do not represent the views or interests of women. To most people, that is probably the more important one. Women directly influenced laws without having the right to vote.Like the Custody of Infants Act and the Tender Years Doctrine. Also, if having women in power or with t…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:31 AM
2

Didn’t they jump on top of work opportunities during WWII and then lose those jobs to men returning to war? World War II did not significantly increase female participation in the workforce.. The increases between married women and single women follow different trajectories, with married women's participation not increasing until 1920. It shows no particular spike in participation during World War II and no decrease in participation from either group after World War II.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:15 AM
5

When your readership is predominantly female all that is required is that you please them.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:12 PM
16

I’d say not being considered their own person or not being able to vote/work/learn What is your evidence for these claims? Because as far as "not being considered your own person", you're probably referring to the law of coverture, which only applied to married women and incorporated her legal existence into that of her husband's, following the idea of two becoming one. The meaning behind coverture is that the wife is covered/protected by the husband, he stands as her representative in all matte…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 04:52 AM
2

Yes this is the new "reality" all fiction should portray. Men follow this rule in their stories, women follow it in their stories, and if anyone goes against it, they are clearly misogynistic.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 02:07 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7ltqia/media_representations_prove_our_blindspot_when_it/
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:57 PM
2

The writings of women who outright hate men= all feminist books.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 12:31 AM
5

I'm so happy to see someone else who has noticed. This is one of the hardest things I have realized about stories- that it is nearly impossible to have a female character truly be considered a villain. Because most of the time, we automatically sympathize with her no matter what she did. I wrote a post a long time ago talking about this, particularly how Nicole Kidman in The Others can play a mother who kills her own children, yet the movie still portrays her as a good mother and we do not view …
/r/MensRights22/04/18 12:19 AM
1

Men don't like to see women in pain or suffering. Exactly, whereas men and women do not care if a man is sad, hence people don't tell men to smile.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:04 AM
1

Evolution theory says that only the ones that can excel in the environment survive Well no, it says that only the ones that can survive in the environment long enough to pass on their genes and have their offspring also be successful in passing on their genes will win out. They don't have to excel, but the ones who excel do best. You don’t want to fuck a disabled ugly fat bitch because of evolution. Of course, women with bad health and genes are at the bottom of the desirability totem pole for w…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 04:58 AM
11

Pretty women get this the most from men, but women largely perceive other women as having inherent worth regardless of the quality of their character. That's what feminism is all about, supporting women in any choice they make because they're women and therefore every one of their decisions is moral. And when it comes to things like life and death situations or the criminal justice system, prettiness is not necessary for any woman to benefit from the pussy pass.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 04:06 AM
0

It's also a biological instinct on our part as a species to want to utilize every potentially viable womb. So we don't want any man refusing a woman who could carry a child. One man can impregnate 50 viable wombs and 50 children will be born, but if he refuses to have sex with 10 of those women, only 40 are born. Less children, back in the day, meant your population was at risk of possible annihilation. On the other hand, we have another biological instinct, or at least women do, that males must…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:01 PM
33

I doubt most women avoid having sex with their husbands because they lack physical desire in general; we are simply more complex sexual animals. Which is why men can get an erection from a pill but there’s no way to medically induce arousal and desire in women. Romance novels, with their model-like bad boy billionaire heroes, seems to have the key to inducing women's libidos. I had to wonder if what these men couldn’t face was something else altogether: hearing why their wives no longer wanted t…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:50 AM
1

Panel two: Entertain her. Be sexy like Channing Tatum in Magic Mike FTFY.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 07:48 PM
2

Rock candy?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 07:35 PM
9

It's not as if "nice guys" don't already provide women with much of the emotional attention and free help and service they want. And what's the female reaction to the male's hope that by being kind and doing nice things for a woman, it might make them like them romantically? "You don't automatically deserve sex from me just for doing nice things! It's called being a decent person! You're a creep worse than those guys who just send me their dick pics!" So essentially, I imagine a lot of these mal…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:12 AM
9

Yup women care about other women's fingernails and how much effort they put in to making them nice. Men don't give a shit at all. It's a demonstration of status and wealth, something women are particularly concerned with. For men, they want to demonstrate status and wealth with things they can buy (yachts, cars, etc.) which is something women do as well, but women also want to demonstrate their freedom of time and care for themselves. A female who has lots of time and money (no job to work at, n…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 04:57 AM
29

Yes because a woman would never complain about this situation in reverse. She would never call out a man for wanting to show off, especially if it made her feel left out./s What's so hypocritical is that this idea "men can't handle smarter women" and so much of the language used in the article is part of the traditional male shaming tactic where men are supposed to be emotionally strong and handle everything that life throws at them. They can't experience emotions like fear or feeling small. And…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 09:16 PM
3

It's an interesting quandary because on the one hand, you can read the writings of the feminists today and you can read the writings of anti-feminists. You can read the writings of the suffragettes and on the other, you can read the writings of the anti-suffragists. There are the writings of the women of the salons of the 1700s, and there are writings of other women of that time. There is Christine de Pizan of the 1300s, and there are other women of her time. There have been proto-feminists in p…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 09:02 PM
2

That's a really good idea. I think it's true that most people are prone to imagine whatever they like about the past, and very likely to demonize it, and it's only by studying real documents that you can begin to understand what was really happening and how people felt about it. But, as a warning, you might want to overlook ones with a feminist bias, or at least also try to find archives without a feminist bias to them. For example, if a historian finds the writings of a feminist blog of today, …
/r/MensRights07/04/18 03:04 AM
12

It started with reading etiquette books and books on marriage advice from the past (where I thought I would find all advice about women serving men but it turned out to be the opposite), then things like Chaucer's Wife of Bath (written in the 1400s about how evil rape is and why women should be trusted with all power), reading up on people like Lucrezia Marinella, realizing that original fairytales were told for largely female audiences and therefore reflected the stories that they wanted to hea…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 02:55 PM
14

Probably the only time I identified as a feminist was when I was a teen, but even still I held onto a lot of feminist beliefs until a few years ago. All it took was investigating history, as in actual historical documents rather than their interpretations. I investigated them from the perspective of wanting to find examples of misogyny and placing male interests and needs above females' or that female stories, values, and perspectives were never considered. What I found was the opposite.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 03:44 AM
2

If you want a strong and productive German nation, then you are in fact a Nazi, the Nazi party concluded.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 03:28 AM
3

You'll find this scenario in many, if not most, films or t.v. shows. Feminists would say something about how it's a male viewpoint that female on male sexual assault is harmless, or that it's different because women have to fear men raping them, or any other excuse they can think of. But even if those were true (which they aren't), it should still be expected of feminists as "gender equalists" to call shows out on that behavior, like they eagerly do whenever they find something misogynistic. Rem…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 03:24 AM
6

Just to clarify, I'm criticizing the article, not your comment, goodbeertimes. Once upon a time, Feminism had honorable goals - empowering women to choose their own path in life, Yes because women were not allowed to do so before. As we all know, women were legally required to marry whoever their parents deemed, then chained barefoot to the kitchen stove until they popped out a baby. Maybe women in the past followed a typical pattern in life like hoping to get married, take care of children, and…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 12:32 AM
9

The feminist version of "helping men" is to get men to accept that they create all of the problems in the world, including their own. So of course they attack anything that doesn't follow their narrative.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 11:10 PM
2

If you acknowledge patriarchy to be real in any capacity, which both feminists of all persuasions and the transgender community do Good to know that if you don't believe in patriarchy theory, you cannot call yourself a feminist.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 11:12 PM
2

women are FAR more likely to be killed in domestic violence situations. The rates were nearly equal in 1975, it's possible that they were equal before then but we don't have the data to prove this. BoJ has the statistics on this. Some charts you'll see are really interesting and certainly demonstrate against the idea that 'men kill more women because they are naturally more violent'. For example, in the 1970s, black women killed their husbands or ex husbands at a significantly higher rate than b…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:17 PM
8

This so perfectly aligns with toxic masculinity wherein men aren't allowed to express emotions. /s
/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:06 PM
5

"I don't. I'd rather be married to someone like that. Have all the money, but not in the spotlight." It's unfortunate that it doesn't go over well because it's such a good explanation of the situation, particularly one that should go over well with women since it's presented as an extremely understandable choice. Maybe you can pander to them and say "women are making the smart choice by simply marrying someone like that..."
/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:12 PM
1

Not to mention, more men at the top are either married or in relationships with women, meaning that they share their money (as well as status, power, and influence) with those women. Haven't we seen all of the cases where a multi-millionaire or even billionaire man has to pay a shocking amount of alimony to his ex-wife? Despite being such powerful men who apparently control everything, they sure don't get a lot of sympathy from the court system in such cases where women are involved.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:05 PM
3

It's also particularly pertinent because if this was a heterosexual couple, the man would typically be seen as having coerced or abused the mother into this kind of behavior. This story demonstrates that two women, no man involved, are fully capable of committing long-term abuse against their children.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:56 AM
3

Another hole in a typical argument made is that although a 13 year old boy may fantasize about sex, that doesn't mean he is ready for it to happen in real life. In a similar way, 13 year old girls may fantasize about having a relationship (as well as sex, too, obviously) but that doesn't mean she is ready for it. Engaging in these behaviors before being mentally mature enough tends to set bad precedents for future relationships and sexual interactions, as well as taking away the innocence of chi…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 06:58 PM
9

The reason most women don’t work on cars is because there parents don’t teach them too not because they are biologically predispositioned not too. My dad tried to teach me several times to take care of my car (even just basic checking the oil kind of thing), my husband continues to try to. It always goes in one ear and out the other because as a woman I know if my car breaks down, a man will always be there to help me. As an MRA and an egalitarian, I realize I really should learn it, but at the …
/r/MensRights24/03/18 02:50 AM
2

Or place her in front of the sink/toilet/engine/flat tire and say, "fix it". Or even just in front of a full garbage and say "take it out". Women are really oblivious to the typical tasks they deal out to men.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 07:24 PM
3

is because men like these are running the governments of these countries and that this kind of chivalric ritual was even MORE prevalent when women were politically disenfranchised. Yup, it's certainly nothing to do with government policy-makers or anything. Women have always been able to control or set terms for the behavior they expect from men, and it's up to men whether they accept those terms or not. But most seem to go along with whatever she wants. Personally, I believe the old adage of ha…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 04:45 AM
7

While it is a good and interesting article that describes the scientific data on why heterosexual males rape young fertile women most often, it certainly does not answer the whole question of 'why do people rape'? Women, typically while still young and attractive, seem to really enjoy raping, whether statutory or not, young boys anywhere between 17 years old and 4 years old. You've seen it all around here before. Teachers and babysitters usually. I don't think this is about power however, if it …
/r/MensRights23/03/18 04:32 AM
2

I find that this is true even to a broader extent. One man does something bad and in our minds, it directly connects with an association that men are bad and they all do bad things. Even though men do a lot of good things, we don't have this automatic association made when we see them do good things; it does not contribute to our thinking that men are good overall. The opposite is true for women. We see a woman do a good thing, it connects us to our belief that women are good. We see a woman do …
/r/MensRights22/03/18 07:30 PM
58

And it's all under the guise of "but we're showing women being real! We don't want them to be portrayed as perfect and wonderful!" Which sounds great until you realize that it is always with the caveat of "but of course, they still are wonderful, or if anything, they're still not nearly as bad as men..." They don't want to have to live up to any expectations of being good or moral, while at the same time always expecting that people will still think of them as good and moral.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 06:52 PM
3

Women never seem to understand that men aren't given a pass for these same behaviors. They receive the same amount of guilt, shame, and belief that they are horrible for not being around their children. It's just that that behavior isn't unexpected because of our idea that men are bad, and when women do the same thing it conflicts with our inherent belief that women are good.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:26 AM
9

a man mounting on a woman to thrust a large member of himself into her most intimate parts, often forcing her to be entirely naked, banging himself against her with the whole weight of his body and hips, shaking her like he would stuff a corpse, Wow, she makes sex sound so violent. Meanwhile, the vast majority of other women demand this become a new romance novel.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 02:59 AM
2

I deeply apologize. How could I forget the mere mention of such a traumatic event is as terror-inducing as the event itself. I apologize to all mantapping sufferers, real and imagined.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 02:44 AM
12

How dare you disrespect the victims of shouldertapping, hereby known as mantapping. Don't you know the psychological trauma a woman experiences by receiving an unwanted tap on the shoulder from a man? She would have no idea what he might do to her! /s
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:00 PM
3

the definition of sexual assault has been made so fuzzy that women don't even know if they have been assaulted anymore. More like if they consider it assault, or if a feminist tells them it was assault, then it was assault. Like that random guy who simply mentioned she was pretty in passing? That was assault, apparently.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 07:53 PM
1

If few people believe that men are capable of being a domestic violence victim of a woman at all, then it is unlikely that they will determine a death of a man as stemming from domestic violence on the part of his partner. That is just fundamentally untrue, if your killer is your spouse then it is legally by definition a domestic/intimate homicide. Again, it would depend on the police determining that the man was a)murdered and b)by his spouse in the first place. If they are less likely to do so…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 06:03 AM
1

If few people believe that men are capable of being a domestic violence victim of a woman at all, then it is unlikely that they will determine a death of a man as stemming from domestic violence on the part of his partner. In 1975, the number of men and women killed by their intimate partner was nearly equal and has since widened. One theory for why this is the case is that domestic violence shelters began opening up for women in the 1970s, giving them a place to go to so that they did not end u…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 04:50 AM
2

I'm just looking for one that could be a wham, bam, mic drop. To be fair, none of girlwriteswhat's videos are exactly wham, bam, mic drop in the sense of none of them are short. Most take 30 minutes or so. You might do better by looking through her comments here on reddit because she usually rehashes this same stuff with facts and links but in a more condensed form. I think these might be her best 'anti-patriarchy' videos: Hi, Danielle, nice to meet your acquaintance Response to an LDS man Invis…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 04:10 AM
3

Women have the ability to importune people to do things for them, so they use it. And that also works best for them because they don't want positions of overt power. A person in a position of overt power may receive accolades if they do things right, but it also turns them into a target and they will be held responsible if things go awry. Women want positions of covert power so that at any time they need to, they can deny power and responsibility.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 10:14 PM
24

When a woman is beating up a man, it's less likely she will do any major damage to him, or kill him, unless she has a weapon. A man can generally run away from the situation/escape, or push her away etc, while women simply can't. A woman usually has access to a weapon in some form, even if that is simply a lamp to throw at his head or of course a knife from the kitchen. It is domestic violence, therefore taking place in a home and giving access to a lot of tools that can be used to cause harm. E…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:58 PM
6

Yes, in another thread on here (about Rachel Johnson) a man named William Freeman was brought to court over kissing his female friend's shoulder and head. The judge ruled that he must register on a sex offender list and that he "learned his lesson that you don't make an advance on a woman who doesn't want you to." So hence Katy Perry here should be forced to sign as a sex offender because she made an advance without knowing whether the man wanted her to.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:28 PM
2

No ladies allowed, gentleman only please. This is supposed to convey the societal idea that women no longer need to adhere to any kind of expectations or restrictions on their behavior, yet men are still expected to act chivalrous and like gentlemen. But I can't think of a way to make it more clear in the sentence... maybe someone else can.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:21 PM
2

I think only in terms of "lacking power" are they comparing themselves to children. I don't doubt for a second that feminists do believe that when it comes to things like domestic violence and the like, women can be compared to children. However as far as the analogy she's making goes, she simply believes that men are in control of women on the whole in the way that adults are in control of children. Of course that is in no way true and women have so much social power and societal sympathy that …
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:09 PM
2

What the Ansari incident is bringing up for women is that some women gave up their power and silently endured humiliating sex. What the Ansari incident brings up is that it's socially acceptable for women to enjoy oral sex with no thought of reciprocation, but you are an obvious misogynist if you expect a woman to give you head without returning the favor.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:26 PM
6

"Because women do" This is their new mantra. Suddenly every woman constantly lives in fear of "what a man might do to her" at any given time and for anything she does. Notice how women always feel the need to tip their male waiters more or pay for their male partner's dinner on a date? It's because they're so afraid of what a men might do to them if they don't. /s Notice how women initiate the majority of divorces? It's only because they're afraid of what their husbands might do to them if they …
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:03 PM
1

It's all about making guys adhere to girl rules. Women don't fact check in front of each other, they do it after and then backtalk the shit out of the woman.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:26 PM
4

The woman (who cannot be named, as is the way of these things) was pointing out a wasps’ nest when Mr Freeman made his clumsy pass. The guy did not point out the wasp's nest as a way to distract her, he made his move while she was pointing it out. We don't know any other context than that. Maybe it was a clumsy attempt, but would you really feel it was "creepy" if it was a woman who did it to a man? Would you think she should be charged with sexual assault? Should it be made an actual crime to m…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:22 PM
7

You won't engage in a conversation because someone used the phrase 'fuck off' once in the middle of other well-articulated points? It's rather elitist, not to mention puritan, of you.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:49 AM
1

The notion that society prevented women working really only describes middle class and up women in the West in the nineteen fifties. What makes you think so? Middle and upperclass women had been working as doctors, lawyers, scholars, teachers, etc. since the 1800s, why would they suddenly "prevent" women from working in those social classes in the 1950s? For example, at the height of World War II, 19 million women were working and made 36.1% of the total labor force. In 1950, 18 million women we…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 09:17 PM
1

"We only do this because we have to!" No, you have enough ability as a person that if you really wanted to encourage women to no longer wear sexual clothing, you could by setting an example yourself. Just like any other trend in fashion. "These clothes shouldn't be considered 'sexual', they're just a fashion choice! It's men who are sexualizing these clothes for no reason at all!" If your bare back isn't sexual, why did women make such a big deal about this? I mean, would it have been just as si…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 10:46 PM
9

They tell me they are under pressure to be superhuman: ambitious, smart and hardworking, athletic, [attractive] and sexy, socially active, nice and popular -- both online and off. Wait, so girls now feel the same pressures that have always been applied to boys? And they're having a hard time with it? And we find it appalling that these pressures be applied to women? Don't worry, just because these girls feel greatly under pressure, teen boys are the ones committing suicide at nearly 3X as often …
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:16 AM
1

"Termination of Parental Rights: 30 states allow for the termination of parental rights of perpetrators of sexual assault who conceive a child as a result. Restriction of Parental Rights: 20 states allow for some form of restriction on the parental rights of perpetrators of sexual assault." People just usually want this to apply to men, not women.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:30 PM
1

The only exception is China where women commit suicide more often men. Even then, it is 8 men for every 10 females. Quite smaller than say Poland's where it is 6.7 men for every 1 female suicide.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 10:56 PM
7

I think the point is that western society (whatever its flaws) tends to treat women better than most other societies do generally, though some specifics may differ This implies that in non-western countries a)women are generally treated badly and b)women are treated worse than the men. It's more accurate, in my opinion, to say that in traditional cultures, both men and women follow strict gender roles. In western countries, women have been freed from this, but men haven't.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 05:03 AM
3

It's got to be one of the reasons for the high rates of male suicide, particularly middle-aged men who've recently divorced, have lost their house, money, and most likely have had their children turned against them by their mother. You somehow don't have higher rates of female suicide even with men dominating businesses and politics.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 04:13 AM
5

Considering the woman raped a child to get pregnant in the first place, she should have been ineligible to keep the child and it should have been adopted out.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 04:00 AM
19

The law should not except Nathaniel J. from this responsibility because he is not an innocent victim of Jones's criminal acts. After discussing the matter, he and Jones decided to have sexual relations. They had sexual intercourse approximately five times over a two-week period. In an action to impose vicarious liability upon a minor's parents, Cynthia M. v. Rodney E. (1991) 228 Cal. App. 3d 1040, 1045 [279 Cal. Rptr. 94], held a minor's consent to unlawful sexual intercourse was "a permissible …
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:32 PM
3

White feather girls. Women are certainly capable of taking part in a war and specifically ushering men to do take part in them. It doesn't matter at all if they are not the ones who do the killing themselves. Haven't men been encouraged to go off and fight wars specifically to protect their women and children? And don't you think, like we see with the white feather girls, much of that would come from expectations of women themselves? Women are certainly not above using violence and certainly not…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:39 AM
3

It's just so ridiculous to think that an adult woman can throw herself time and time again at her boss, and yet if he doesn't say no, it will be considered rape for him to have sex with her. That's what this belief comes to. People want to use it for situations where the boss is making a move on an employee and the employee is made to feel that they must agree to it. But the former situation also happens and it is just beyond comprehension that we think a woman "can't consent" to this in a viabl…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:17 AM
4

Ever notice that most women want you to listen to their emotions, but the only emotions they want to hear about from you are the ones you feel about them? The 'perfect' men in those books all have a week side. They simply overcome it to be with the girl. This is exactly what he's talking about. The male leads in these romantic books and movies only express fear or sadness, particularly crying, if it is about the possibility of losing the woman. Everything about him needs to be about her. He beco…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:38 PM
10

Feminism, since it began by concentrating only on women's issues, basically started this automatic assumption of a need to divide male issues and female issues. Or really, to insist that there were only female issues. From what you can see around here and in the Men's Rights Movement, there aren't that many issues that one gender faces alone. So it's far better to have a movement that is about the equality of humans. Since feminism exists and is so powerful and accepted, I call myself an MRA bec…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:52 PM
1

Yeah I find it just as appalling. But that's how our instincts go as far as maintaining the population is concerned. Women are top priority because they have the ability to reproduce any children lost. If it can be brought to our attention though, hopefully things could change.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:44 AM
3

Again, what's your evidence? If women had to do what men told them to, what happened two centuries ago to change this? Did the women stage a military coup? Did they all agree that on a certain day at a certain time, every wife and daughter would hold a knife up to her husband or father’s neck until he promised to do whatever she asked? Did they set about poisoning every man they saw until just infant boys were left and they instilled in them the idea that women were equal to men, but it still to…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:49 PM
8

My belief is that women have always had agency, same as any other person. How were they property? As single and widowed women they could own property solely in their own names. As married women they jointly owned property with their husbands, in all senses but in name since he could not sell any property without her agreement. This was so that he got stuck with the bill and she didn't. Now it is interesting to live in these modern times since I think you can actually see women choosing, or shoul…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:43 AM
5

It does not sound like she is against feminism. It sounds like she believes 'denying women their agency' is a part of the patriarchy rather than the theme of feminism's beliefs. I'm pointing out that she is in fact perpetuating a feminist lie and deserves to be called out for it.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:14 AM
10

And telling women that there is no dark side to them, that they are pure as cream, is detrimental to their mental health. We are not better. To suggest so, you not only remove our agency and erase us from history, you cauterize our ability to make choices. Why are you directing this at a man? You should direct this at any feminist because that is precisely what they have done since the beginning of their movement. Thought: Women did not typically work or educate themselves in a similar way that …
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:45 PM
1

Much of femininity is related to aspects that men find appealing about women: softness, kindness, delicacy, having a certain kind of appearance, domestic skills, childrearing skills, etc. This sets up certain expectations for which kind of women are most desirable to have relationships with. Therefore, purely as a mating strategy, feminists are opposed to any expectations placed on women which might limit their ability to gain a partner, but particularly to gain a partner which meets or exceeds …
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:24 PM
8

Teach her that men — good men — will be there to protect her. If you teach her this, she will not bother with anything else in the way of self-protection. In the same way that the majority of women don't care about learning to change a tire or car maintenance because they know if their car breaks, some man will always stop to help them on the side of the road.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:15 PM
3

Why go out with the nice-seeming guy who makes you laugh when he’s certainly not as nice as he seems How many times do they have to play this card? 'He's just pretending to be nice, what he really wants is sex, the horrible cad!" The vast majority of times, this is about an average-looking dude who is indeed nice and wants sex and wants a relationship with the girl. But somehow him not being okay with just acting the role of the boyfriend without sex makes him the jerk who only wanted sex...
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:11 PM
9

What we consider power is subjective, especially from what feminism has taught us. They point to people in places of authority and say they have all of the power. Meanwhile, women have the ability to make an accusation through Twitter and ruin a man's career. Or, in ye olden times, string a man up a tree.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:00 PM
2

Edit2: In other words, if all men stopped being manly -- just as an example here -- it's not like all women would lose all interest in men. (And vice versa.) Many men have become 'unmanly' by women's standards and there seems to be a lot of talk about how horrible that is, especially for women. Women who decide to be artificially inseminated because "they can't find a man". Of course it isn't true that they can't find a man, they just can't find one that fits their "requirements". Women's attitu…
/r/MensRights24/02/18 09:55 PM
1

They are trapped, and they don’t even have the language to talk about how they feel about being trapped, because the language that exists to discuss the full range of human emotion is still viewed as sensitive and feminine. If you asked men which movies are the greatest ever made, they say things like Rudy, Saving Private Ryan, Star Wars (ahem, original series), etc. If you asked about books, they would say things like The Wheel of Time series, The Lord of the Rings, etc. Most male-centric stori…
/r/MensRights24/02/18 09:39 PM
3

I'm guessing that although the poor class might not have gotten jewelry and the like to wear, there was a similar principle where poor wives dressed and appeared better than their husbands. And likewise the same with the rich class.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 03:43 AM
22

Lucrezia Marinella from the year 1600: "It is a marvelous sight in our city to behold the wife of a shoemaker, a butcher, or even a porter, all dressed up with gold chains round her neck, with pearls and valuable rings on her fingers, accompanied by a pair of women on either side to assist her and give her a hand, and by contrast, to see her husband cutting up meat all soiled with ox's blood and down at heel, or loaded up like a beast of burden dressed in rough cloth, as porters are. At first it…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 07:51 PM
2

Having seen enough cultures that are supposed to be "patriarchal" and where "women are nothing" and finding just the opposite, I agree. I have a neighbor whose son married a Chinese woman, and then quickly divorced her because she was so domineering. He had to call her to get her approval to buy lunch. I'll always remember his parents' shock because they expected from how we talk about their culture that the woman would be a submissive little mouse (and this wasn't something they wanted, they di…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:56 AM
1

And the next step is that the rules and set up of the game is patriarchal and that from now on football is simply two groups of people coming together to sing kumbaiya. Looking forward to that Super Bowl.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:38 AM
3

Feminists always have a nebulous answer for what feminism is. It's always supposed to be inclusive of a vast array of viewpoints that are all valid... until a feminist tells another woman what she shouldn't do, and then suddenly there always seems to be an answer to what feminism isn't. And judging from this I now understand that feminism is simply women agreeing to never tell each other what they can or cannot do. But of course this only applies to women, women get to tell men what they should …
/r/MensRights22/02/18 03:41 AM
6

Big noses are characteristic of white people, so she's clearly identifying as a white sympathizer. How dare she.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:26 AM
3

You probably don't wear shirts opened so low that they show off your bare pecs or short shorts to show off your legs. There's also a difference between well-fitted and formfitting or essentially skin tight. Suits are attractive on men, but they aren't 'sexy' in the same way that a man without a shirt is. A woman has every ability to wear a well-fitted dress or skirt or pants that is modest, and therefore appropriate for work, and still be considered attractive. Instead, they tend to go for looki…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 06:51 PM
1

It's also important to note that the majority of these shootings take place in high school and by boys who have been at the lower end of the social hierarchy there. The boys at the bottom get the most bullied, physical and mental, by other boys and girls. Everyone knows high school is where people feel the most pressure from their peers, to fit in, be cool, be liked. Once you go onto college or real life, you realize how stupid it was to care so much about it. But before then it feels like the e…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:25 AM
5

It is the theme of every favorite female story. She conquers the man who just happens to be extremely powerful and rich. She doesn't need to put in the effort to do those things herself, she can get a man who has already done it for her. She lords over him by presenting herself as having moral superiority and bewitching beauty. He is a bad man, a pompous and prideful snob (Mr. Darcy), a scalawag with no morals (Rhett Butler), or a perverted BDSM sadist (Christian Grey). Another form that this ta…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 09:02 PM
4

This post never says overweight women are not attracted to overweight men AND deserve or expect men to be attracted to them. "As a plus-sized woman, there's this expectation that you should only date overweight men. But what if you aren't attracted to plus-sized men? These women open up about dealing with the stigma of being plus-sized and refusing to settle and date overweight men. From dealing with harsh criticism to feelings of guilt for their preferences, find out what they had to say in the…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 08:22 PM
2

That's what I was implying.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 07:56 PM
1

You're right, I thought about including mouth, but I'm sure they used the example of anal to most closely compare with a vagina.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 07:55 PM
12

Even worse are the things that a torturer can and will do to a woman, such as inserting a heated iron into her vagina or stubbing out cigarettes on her breasts. Because you know, a torturer would never stick a hot iron up a man's asshole. And stubbing out cigarettes on a woman's breasts is somehow far worse than stubbing them out on a man's nipples. Women's breasts have greater emotional sensitivity you see. Oh and a torturer would never, ever cut off a man's penis. And if he did, we would obvio…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 05:23 AM
4

but the lady he chose for the leading role was white. Yes, feminists (particularly hmm white ones) never seem to care that when males are eschewed for lead roles, they always go to white women. At least there seems to be a growing backlash against it in POC circles, I've seen a few articles.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 05:14 AM
1

Or that women can be on top and even in other positions be the one generating motion rather than just receiving it.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 05:07 AM
14

And he's really saying that taking it in the ass is "what it means to be a woman"? Where does that leave men who do enjoy it, and women who don't? I think it's supposed to be about the act of being penetrated by someone else, not about anal, but that is the only option for men to be penetrated by someone else. But it's all once again a scare tactic. Women have to be penetrated in order to have sex, don't you know how vulnerable that makes them? Well men have their genitalia outside of their body…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:51 AM
3

Here's another chart to make it more clear: http://dchrs.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ChartPieofPieEn-670x300.jpg 3)If they were considered property, what would be the point of having their owner killed in war? What was the point of having the majority of women saved over men, even men who owned huge companies, if they were the mere possessions of these men? If people don't consider women to be property in the western world, why are they so opposed to a female draft or 50/50 representation in …
/r/MensRights18/02/18 02:44 AM
11

What's your reasoning? If anything, he's talking about the principle of women having inherent value to society because of their reproductive capability. Whether it's a disaster like a building fire or a war, we value saving women, even old women about to die, over the lives of men, and even to an extent children. 75% of the total women were saved on the Titanic, but only 50% of the children and 19% of the men. http://www.icyousee.org/titanic.html The same is true for civilian deaths in Syria. ht…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:51 PM
16

It's essentially the ideal outcome of the female mating strategy: all women are venerated and worshiped and sought after no matter what they look like or act like (i.e. no need to be pretty or nice). They have absolutely no restrictions placed on them, yet all men must strive to be worthy of their standards for men.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:22 PM
44

This is what I am beginning to accept. Society can accept women having a more versatile role, but it can't accept men doing so. Oh wait, I mean men can accept women being whatever they want, but women can't accept the same about men.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:18 PM
35

rather than shoehorning themsleves into bad universities to study STEM degrees to stick it to the man Except that they don't do this. They complain that society does not make them more interested in STEM and then they go get a gender studies degree.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:16 PM
3

It brings up an allowance that we make for women, wherein we believe that it is their right to wear however little clothes they like and still be found just as respectable and modest as a nun. We do not give men this same allowance, as we can see in their business clothing as well as casual clothing where shorts never rise above the knee and necklines rarely go past their collarbones. People would find it hard to take seriously a man wearing short shorts and a shirt that shows his man cleavage, …
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:31 PM
14

As women we have been oppressed by men's physical advantage over us since the beginning of humankind. I'm so sick of hearing this argument. It is tantamount to saying that all people who are taller and stronger are inherently oppressive to those shorter than them- don't you know what they could do?! Children, despite having the greatest power disparity of all in terms of strength and intelligence, still are somehow not oppressed by adults in the vast majority of cases. We are biologically progra…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:28 PM
3

In countries where there is extreme hostility to homophobia, such as killing men for it, it is culturally appropriate for men to touch each other such as holding hands and dance together, and I imagine call each other attractive. This is likely because of also culturally keeping the sexes separate, as in men can't dance with women so of course they can dance with men. In our culture where it's perfectly acceptable for men to dance with women and most people do so in a sexualized manner, it's no …
/r/MensRights16/02/18 06:54 PM
8

Do men find rooms full of women intimidating? Are we allowed to? Imagine someone said like yeah it's so intimidating to look into a room full of women as a guy What's funny is that men are jeered at for finding women intimidating. We hear about this all of the time with men finding "strong, smart" women intimidating or the other phrase they use is "men feel threatened by such women". So women feeling intimidated by a room full of men, not from a physically threatening standpoint, but just an int…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 06:05 PM
9

Regular guys, just impulsive, sexually frustrated, and not very empathetic....I think our culture surrounding the differences between men and women is what's messing us up. You've highlighted a big natural difference between men and women, in that women pretty much always have the option of having sex with someone, whereas men usually have to put in a lot of effort to get a woman to agree to have sex with them. Hence, women believe it shouldn't be a big deal at all for a sexual encounter to stop…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 05:56 PM
5

I declare this to be the first time in recorded history that a man was taught that rape is bad. /s
/r/MensRights15/02/18 05:44 PM
2

Feminists would be down I bet so long as their were no specific standards of beauty and if men viewed their giving of their sexuality to them with a kind of religious veneration. I think I read a feminist article before about how sex work could be truly feminist if people viewed a prostitute as a kind of "sexual healing doctor". Also they would insist that men have nothing against dating or marrying a sex worker, because otherwise they view it as men solely using women as sex objects.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 10:23 PM
10

Men are competitive, men like to be competitive. They like to talk about competition. For some reason this article made me finally understand how feminists can claim that everything is set up under a patriarchal view or male-centered view. Males do prefer overt competition, self-reliance, striving to do one's best performance, and taking on high-risk enterprise. Hence, they automatically prefer some activities where one could naturally find these things, such as hiking an extreme trail over the …
/r/MensRights13/02/18 10:04 PM
6

I was watching the show Mom where it's about a recovering alcoholic mother with two kids who lives with her also recovering alcoholic mother. At first I thought this was a step in the right direction because they were portraying women as having problems, problems that often hurt their children, etc. But when you watch it, the men in the show will often be portrayed as being far worse than the women. So even though the recovering alcoholic mom had been a drug abuser who frequently wasn't responsi…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:58 PM
1

Feminists, especially the first wave, fought hard to get men to evaluate women on their intellectual abilities instead of their bodies. Do you mean as far as the workplace or gaining esteem from colleagues? I don't think any man cared about Marie Curie's looks over her ability for science. A lot of women can use their looks and sexuality to get further ahead in a job, but the same is probably true for an attractive man under a female boss or female-dominated workplace or a gay male boss as well.…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 09:03 PM
7

The same is typical for just about all women (typically teens or women under 25) who try to kill their children just after birth. Because they deny or hide their pregnancy from the beginning, their murderous behavior certainly can't be attributed to post-partum depression since we would then see it in women who up until birth ackowledged their pregnancy. Yet everyone gives that excuse, "Oh, but you just don't know what it's like to go through birth." Even pregnancy allows you 9 whole months to c…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:41 PM
5

Yes, so? In which wicked world would that be called equality. It's a bit different than your earlier blanket statement that "women couldn't hold property". It means that married women not holding property in their names wasn't about believing women shouldn't hold property on the basis of their sex, but this was an exception given to married women. And why? Because then it was their husband's sole responsibility to pay for it. What equality means is different for everyone. Feminists are now insis…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:29 PM
7

when women could not own property, or when only sons would inherit from parents. Single and widowed women could own property in their own names, married women owned property through their husbands. Although it was typical for sons to inherit from their parents, the only time it was required by law was if the property was entailed. Emmy Noether had quite an uphill battle to fight to be accepted as mathematician. I didn't see any objection to Arabella Mansfield becoming the first American female l…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:34 PM
16

Especially if we lower our standards of credibility, false accusations will only increase because of the idea that you should always believe a person when they make a claim.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:18 PM
3

The assumption isn't a reality, but a WISH. Unfortunately, I think it is a reflection of people noticing and perceiving male on female violence as horrific, always unjustifiable. People notice female on male violence but it is perceived as always justified. That is the biggest problem. We know it exists, we just don't care or we think it is deserved. A great example of this is the many times we see female on male violence portrayed in movies and television, whether it's just a slap across the fa…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:37 AM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHkGZvC0z4I&t=31s The Invisible Man Riding The Donkey Backwards.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:34 AM
4

I'm not talking about how formal the clothes are, but rather the modesty standards. As a female, I have worn shorts that went just past my thighs with tights underneath to work before. I have worn tops that were skin tight and showed cleavage when I bent over. I probably wore yoga pants a time or two. It never occurred to me before that this was inappropriate to wear as a professional because it exposes a lot of skin, and no one called me out for it. It also never occurred to me that there was a…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:28 AM
5

How many men do you work with, if at all, wear shirts with necklines that actually go below the neck? Essentially, lower than a crewneck? How many men wear shirts without sleeves? How many men wear shorts rather than full length pants? How many men wear shorts above their knees? Now how many times have you seen a woman wear a neckline longer than a crewneck? A sleeveless blouse? Shorts or a skirt that goes to her knee? Shorts or a skirt that go above her knee?
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:46 AM
5

We were talking about the workplace. I don't think you've ever seen a man dress in anything but a suit and tie because the vast majority of men can't by their own workplace expectations. Meanwhile, women are able to wear mini skirts and tops that display cleavage and everyone is supposed to find this completely professional. Where did groping come from? Absolutely no one said that because someone wears less clothing that means it's okay to grope them. We were simply talking about sexual attracti…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:21 AM
13

Can you really tell me that you would find a man wearing short shorts and a shirt that displayed his man cleavage to work to be every bit as professional looking as a man wearing the standard suit and tie? You wouldn't find it a bit distracting and you wouldn't assume that he dressed that way because he really wanted to show off his assets, most likely to attract someone in the office or a client?
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:11 AM
2

I believe since she first called him a misogynist and then added that feminism is about equality, then her main argument is that if you're not a feminist, you're a misogynist. That's why he calls her a misandrist for not being an MRA. Let's put it this way, if her main point was that feminism is about equality, the conversation would have gone: "Are you a feminist?" "No." "Then you must not believe in equality because that's all feminism is."
/r/MensRights03/02/18 10:08 PM
3

She was the first one to say he is a misogynist for not being a feminist. She jumped to the conclusion that if he is not a feminist, then he is not for women's rights, hence making him a misogynist. And he used that argument against her.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 09:05 PM
5

I love how Wonder Woman does not need to prove her intelligence with her actions, she simply needs to have a "brainy and winsome" smile. It reminds me of a quote from Pride and Prejudice where Mr. Darcy starts taking notice of Elizabeth Bennet because "her face... was rendered uncommonly intelligent by the beautiful expression of her dark eyes." You see, Elizabeth doesn't have to be intelligent, Mr. Darcy did not need to overhear some astute comment of hers, she simply needed to show her intelli…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:29 PM
7

Women are grown ups and there is no reason to believe that they have more reason to fear from engaging in a sexual encounter with a man than a man does with a woman. It is theoretically an inherently dangerous situation especially if you're engaging in it with a stranger, but that likely isn't a thought for the majority of partners. If for any reason you think a man or woman might be dangerous if refused a sexual act, do not engage in sexual acts with them. Or, carry around protective devices su…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 11:48 PM
1

If pretty young women would stop showing off their bodies and reinforcing the patriarchal notion that that type of woman is most physically attractive, then the feminist type of woman will have more ability to be seen as attractive. Hence they don't care when a woman who is not seen as conventionally attractive shows skin because she is furthering their cause.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 11:18 PM
7

Don't you know there's nothing an adult woman could do against the superior strength and power of a 5 year old boy? She was helpless!
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:49 PM
3

What's great is that so many of these you don't automatically see as misandric, until you think about what the public reaction would be if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 11:24 PM
9

50% of women say they give consent by verbal cues? Ha!
/r/MensRights30/01/18 04:05 PM
164

They probably specifically chose to show the woman in the video being a kickboxer, martial artist, whatever to show that he loves the shape of her body that comes from wanting to be "strong", rather than working out to look good. Therefore it becomes PC.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 03:44 PM
2

Agreed. Most women specifically prefer positions of covert power precisely so that they can later, if anything goes awry, point their finger at someone else to say "I had nothing to do with this, it was all their fault!" A great example is their ability to convince everyone of patriarchy theory. Women have the ability to be seen as vulnerable and therefore worthy of protection and special consideration. Hence the phrase "think of the women and children" has such potency. It's similar to the way …
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:00 PM
4

Yeah I remember watching Leon and feeling really grossed out by it. Shame on her parents for letting their child do that.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 09:01 PM
16

because female customers don't usually fantasize about submissive men. Hence 50 Shades of Grey, that features a BDSM dominant male and submissive female, written by a woman and for a female audience, became a huge bestseller despite being written in 2009. Look at the popularity amongst females for written erotica featuring dominant males and submissive females vs dominant females and submissive males
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:32 PM
20

Fairytales from the 1600s ( a great collection is the Pentamerone by Giambattista Basile) and onwards used to be far more equal in this. There was usually a wicked stepmother, evil wife of the King the princess wanted to marry, evil female servant who tries to marry the prince in place of the princess, or witch who acted as the villain. But as we all know today, these portrayals of female characters are "misogynistic" and "stereotypes". In fact, because most fairytales are told with a female pro…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:12 AM
3

Most women seem to think it is a right they deserve to demonstrate to men that women can physically hurt them so they better back off. Of course, if that were actually true, then there would be nothing wrong with the man then engaging in a fight with the woman because hey, she's supposed to be able to beat his ass. So then what her violence really comes down to is a signal to everyone around her that this guy is doing something she doesn't like, therefore she may need their help. But there is no…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:32 AM
8

Is it okay for a man to slap a woman just because she told him she wants to gobble his cock? Is it okay for a man to slap a woman just because she touched him at all? Is it okay for a man to beat up a woman because she made comments like that to or about his son?
/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:26 AM
1

all these Hollywood actresses and feminist types are taught to be so scared of men in universities by feminists and so on that they've become incapable of standing up for themselves and knowing how to establish boundaries. This has been my realization lately too. Everything about their rhetoric is about damseling, "I was too scared" and "I didn't know how to say no". The feminist version of making women strong and independent seems to be reliant on the idea that we must eradicate all of the mons…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:53 PM
84

This needs to be the male response to any form of what is now considered sexual harassment or assault, that is, responding in a way that a woman would. Without it, women will never know what kind of stringent restrictions they're insisting men take on.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:35 PM
220

Straight women just happen to be the group who wants sex the least From a less than desirable person. Straight women like aggression from men they find attractive. But as a man you're supposed to intuitively know how attractive a woman finds you from her extremely subtle signals.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:32 PM
11

"I think the lack of female villains reflects a wider cultural discomfort with women who are not well-behaved and good.” Seriously? You have to turn not being seen as capable of evil as a source of victimhood? Believe me, a lot of people right now are talking about a "wider cultural discomfort with men who are not well-behaved and good." And no one is trying to present it as men who are the victims of it. It is because we believe that boys and men are generally ill-behaved and bad that we accept…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:08 AM
4

There's a great explanation from Warren Farrell on one of the cuts from The Red Pill documentary about how even if you were to compare the category of doctors, more men work in the divisions that earn more, such as surgery rather than being a general practitioner. And then even within surgeons, they go for specialty training that pays more. They've also worked longer years because women will take off work for childbirth and maternity leave. I remember looking it up with male nurses as well, that…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:29 AM
2

Yup. I think it's real application is supposed to solve the "women feel like they can't say no" situation where it is apparently easier to press a button that says no? Still, the same exact problem exists where even if she does agree on the form, she can say she felt like she had to... so totally solves nothing.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:56 PM
0

If feminists don't have any particular unifying beliefs or theories that the vast majority agree upon, then why have a movement or name at all?
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:52 AM
1

"Believe that women can rape men!" sign.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:59 PM
16

Plus if it had been a woman, someone could then go on to say she'd better wear a thick sweater or jacket every time she goes on a plane. If she gets cold and her nipples show through her shirt, that is sexual assault to everyone around her, especially the children.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 05:28 AM
1

I'm disappointed that this felt like a haiku, but wasn't.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 03:10 AM
9

Feminism is commonly defined as the "advocacy for women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes" So you admit that feminism is about solely focusing on women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes? I'm fine with that, but this seems demonstrably obvious as to why it would only be half of the equation of equality. Where are men supposed to go to focus on their rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. Even still, the majority of feminists do have specific beliefs ab…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 05:24 PM
8

Feminism never did anything to get rid of the "rule of thumb" because that phrase never actually applied to "wife beating". A husband had the right to 'moderately correct' his wife with spanking or a belt, much in the same way that it was acceptable for children to have been corrected for misbehavior up until very recently. Except that this was no longer considered legally acceptable for husbands to do to their wives at least as far back as the mid 1600s and a woman could legally separate from h…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:04 PM
11

Feminism is a specific ideology that is a subset under the belief of gender equality. If it really was solely about believing in gender equality, it would very simply be named gender equalism or one could call themselves a gender equalist. Feminism comes with specific beliefs about what gender equality is, how to achieve it, and how inequality comes about. If you disagree with those theories, despite believing in gender equality, then it doesn't really make sense to call yourself a feminist. Ask…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:11 PM
31

Or are we to assume that women are always afraid to be killed when they're alone with a man It's so unfortunate that women can always use this trump card, especially because it's based on complete theoretical assumptions. If one were really to take this assumption at face value and at the same time believe in women's agency, there would then be more emphasis on women always carrying weapons such as pepper spray and having it nearby even in sexual situations should she fear for her safety. Or per…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 07:41 PM
1

Also if it really was based mainly on the biological issues that go through a woman's body after they go through labor, we would see more even distribution of neonaticide occurring across all ages, but instead it is mainly concentrated on women in their teens and early 20s. This suggests to me that it is tied more to immaturity than possible mental imbalances caused by the effects of birth.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 12:02 AM
0

"What we know about maternal filicide is specific to the population studied. Few factors are consistent across populations; thus overall, we know very little about which children are at risk for death at the hands of their mothers. " "The Act reduced the charge from murder to manslaughter for a woman who killed her infant under age 1 year if “the balance of her mind was disturbed by reason of her not having fully recovered from the effect of giving birth to a child or by reason of the effect of …
/r/MensRights14/01/18 11:34 PM
3

Conservatives worship women as pure angels. Feminists worship women as all-knowing sex goddesses. The pedestal is the same. The latter just allows women to engage in all sexual behaviors, and to be seen as doing so righteously.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 10:45 PM
6

The way we deal with neonatacide, and the punishments typically given, proves a hole in your argument.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:20 PM
1

I'm wondering if you misread the title of the video? It's not 'don't do anything that makes your kid hate you', it's 'don't let your kids do anything that makes you hate your kid'. So don't let them act like a brat because eventually you'll end up hating your kid as much as everyone else does. Kids operate by wanting to learn how things work and what their limits are. They look to their parents to teach them that. Eventually they accept what things their parents will tolerate and what they won't…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 02:53 AM
2

No in the video he says you absolutely have to address and correct bad behavior from your kids so that you don't end up hating them. So if your kid has a meltdown in the middle of the grocery store, you take them outside until they regain control over themselves, reinforcing the idea that it's not okay to react that way in public places. Sometimes parents will instead just try to ride out the tantrum, keeping the wailing child in the grocery store and trying to deal with the embarrassment or giv…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:14 PM
2

Jordan Peterson- Don't Let Your Kids Do Anything That Makes You Dislike Them https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZU3ugplw8E
/r/MensRights11/01/18 09:57 PM
12

You've just identified the possible underlying reason for all of this. The men who listen and not approach will demonstrate that they are too beta for women, so they don't want them approaching them anyway. The alphas will announce themselves by not listening to what women say.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 09:47 PM
1

More like mansplained... and he should go to jail for it.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 09:37 PM
7

You can't blame women for really believing in their own lack of agency when we have a culture that is not only built on a past that denies their agency but actively tells them they have ZERO agency, which is why they fuck producers, build a career, then come back after they got theirs and make rape claims. I think what #MeToo is really demonstrating is that women will always insist they have no agency. What the recent changes in attitudes particularly surrounding sex show me is that women never …
/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:39 PM
1

Who is an authority on feminism? Maybe you'll tell me that it is the majority of people who call themselves feminists. But why would they be the only true authority? Afterall, you probably would agree that it is not only people who call themselves Christians who should consider themselves authorities on what Christianity is or isn't. You would probably consider the insights of people who are ex-Christians or simply non-Christians as pretty important to the whole conversation. Or maybe it would b…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:20 PM
6

Hear ye, hear ye! The one true feminist, Kore624, speaking for all of feminism as its sole spokesperson, declares this post to be false! Therefore, it is completely debunked.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:47 AM
3

Quotes specifically about his thoughts on masculinity from the article: Philip’s alleged infidelity is a focal point of The Crown Season 2. What is the motivation for him, do you think? Is he trying to claw back some masculinity and independence that he’s given up as the royal consort? What I was always really drawn to in Philip was his maleness, as it were—the alpha side of him. It’s difficult when you’re married to the Queen because that alpha side of you has to be clipped. The Queen is the Qu…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 04:38 AM
7

It reminds me of the story by a feminist (don't know the original source) about how she met her husband. She admits they engaged in sex when she was too drunk to consent and when she woke up she had no memory of the night before. But when she looked over at her sleeping partner, she liked what she saw and therefore didn't have a problem with what happened. Female romance stories pretty much always feature the romantic male as obsessive in his desire for her, hence they tend to act like stalkers.…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 07:29 PM
1

Now it's a mix of the two: he should be intelligent and well-educated, but also have the body of a superhero and capable of the same level of violence (hence all of the adulation for vampires and werewolves). Actually, that brings up an interesting point that it's men who admire superheroes (guys who always use their strength and power for good) whereas women are more interested in supernatural creatures associated with being bad or evil, like vampires and werewolves.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 05:43 AM
2

It's hilarious that feminists decry the horros of the uber-masculine man at the same time when most women are otherwise begging in every way for him. The truth is in the past, refined scholarly aristocratic men were the ideal. It is also the case that when women are expected to act more feminine, men are afforded greater ability to act less masculine. Since we now live in a culture where women are encouraged to be as masculine as possible, men must be even more masculine, uber-masculine, in orde…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:58 AM
6

When I've re-watched Parks and Recreation, I've noticed some huge double standards between male and female characters: -All male characters have a flaw and can be used to show their stupidity at any time. None of the female characters have flaws (beyond things like 'she tries too hard at work' or 'she changes herself for men') and they are never shown as being stupid. -Leslie Knope's mother once felt up Ben Wyatt's knee upon meeting him to demonstrate that she was interested in him. While they s…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:42 AM
3

It's hilarious that they can present this as a slight to women. The behavior of rich women, and their avoidance of lower income men, reveals how they recognize that being attractive mainly based on the amount of money you have certainly isn't better than someone liking your physical looks.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 07:57 PM
7

But my mother started her nursing career wearing a dress, heeled shoes and a ridiculous little hat To be fair, in the past everyone was expected to dress nicely when not at home. Everyone wore hats, everyone wore heeled shoes, women wore skirts or dresses and men wore suits.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 02:42 PM
1

Lol, I knew that 'u' looked wrong. I meant coverture.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 10:53 PM
1

Good point, I remember those songs.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 10:33 PM
2

Feminists really seem to be advocating for a return to the laws of couverture.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 08:12 PM
7

There was a line in there where it was said about the serial killers: "It always comes down to the mother doesn't it?" Immediately followed by: "Or an absent father." I think it tried to take a balanced look, but personally there were far too many instances of feminist thought for me to watch it to the end. Things like, "but yes, all serial killers are male" and "So what if she sexually manipulated him? That's what some women will do just to have an ounce of power in this world."
/r/MensRights24/12/17 06:33 PM
6

Fan clubs also popped up for Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction and Rosamund Pike in Gone Girl, even though the female characters in both films were supposed to be villains, not heroines. That's interesting, I hadn't realized that about them being outright villains, yet women are able to side with them anyway. They've done the same thing with Maleficent from Sleeping Beauty. You're right that the empathy gap is the biggest hurdle we have. I'm an aspiring writer and I'm always trying to think of way…
/r/MensRights24/12/17 06:27 PM
1

...and what will grown women say in a world where men are all feminized in this manner? "I need a REAL man!" Unfortunately, I thought the same thing. You just don't find males exhibiting this kind of behavior in female fantasy books, such as Twilight and Fifty Shades of Grey. And if they do exhibit some of it, it's only because they are super buff, super rich, super handsome guys.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 03:48 AM
1

Tell boys that no one wants to see their genitals unless someone has explicitly asked to see them (and of course, it has to be consensual) I'm sure she'd phrase it this way if she were talking to women. "No one wants to see your genitals, girls, unless they explicitly ask for it." And unsurprisingly, I don't think girls do get that message. Pretty sure they feel really confident about sending guys nudes whenever they feel like it.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 03:43 AM
3

that if a woman is raped [it] is much worse than if woman has a penis exposed to her that she didn’t want or ask for Ask her which experience she'd rather go through, rape or being exposed to the sight of a penis? I'm gonna guess 100% will go with the latter. One could conclude that most assume rape would be far more traumatic.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 04:30 AM
2

I actually wonder if it was normalized with the sexual revolution of the 60s. Before then it would have been considered completely outrageous for a man to grab a woman's butt in public, and so I could see that social policy being rejected as part of the sexual revolution's emphasis that sexuality needn't be kept private. The same with catcalling and a woman being able to wear skimpy clothes, it was all supposed to be about embracing sexuality as something that can be done in public without shame…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 04:26 AM
2

Most women do appreciate male beauty, or they certainly have high standards for what male beauty is. But they do prefer to be considered the beautiful ones in the relationship and in the world. Men do delight in female success and would find it an attractive feature if they didn't have a lot of evidence to suggest that when a woman becomes more successful than him, she inevitably becomes unsatisfied with him. I do think it would be helpful to frankly acknowledge these preferences and the harm th…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 11:32 PM
1

"Tell me more about your #MeToo stories. It turns me on..." or "Tell me more about how you're oppressed by men at every turn. It turns me on..." You'd think feminists would want the opposite.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 11:24 PM
13

In every chart I can find, the children are always significantly more than the women. And I would guess that is because of male children. https://antiwar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Syria-Stats.png
/r/MensRights14/12/17 11:16 PM
2

I laughed when I heard that that was the age difference between the two. It seemed like it should have illustrated the vast differences in strength and agility between men and women, not proved otherwise.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 04:33 AM
5

Chaucer was writing about it way back in the 1400s: “Well, when I realized that he was never going to stop saying such things, I got so angry that I ripped three pages out of the book, right there as he was reading it. I also punched him in the face with my fist so hard that he fell backward into the fire in the fireplace. He sprang up like a pouncing lion and punched me right back on the side of my head so hard that I fell down and didn’t move, just as if I were dead. And when he saw what he ha…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 12:20 AM
2

Being frank about it, as she is, would help educate the naive people about potential risks and dangers. She is helping them to be less naive.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 11:10 PM
5

It's hard to know if he really was "in control" of their career and if there was only the option of sleeping with him to further their career. It could just have been that, yes, their career might be greatly enhanced by giving a sexual favor to such a highly influential man, but that certainly doesn't mean it was their only option, even just to get his favor. When Pamela Anderson talks about having offers to do private auditions and the like, it sounds as if this is simply an option to further h…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:04 AM
1

Public transport gets women to their jobs, so if men make them uncomfortable there, it's all to keep them at home, barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen! I'm sure you could publish this theory at Jezebel or Buzzfeed.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:35 AM
1

As we see from the way women talk about men today, when men hold anything less than the top earning positions, they suddenly become man babies who need to grow up. So men need to work hard and earn money in appropriately lucrative jobs, but then again if they succeed, it's because they're patriarchal shitlords who only got there because of male privilege. I suppose the ideal world for women is one where men do all the hard work but get none of the credit.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:33 AM
1

In order for covert power to be utilized, it must stay covert.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:24 AM
5

The only reason why some battles weren't won as swiftly (eg. abortion in the US, Equal Rights Amendment, suffrage) is because OTHER WOMEN were opposed to the feminists on those issues. This is the true explanation for all of female "oppression" and strictures, expectations, etc. for all of history. It doesn't come from men, it comes from women disagreeing amongst themselves about what they want.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:28 AM
4

In fact it's a song about a woman finding a way to exercise sexual agency in a patriarchal society designed to stop her from doing so. Or maybe for most of history if an unmarried woman had sex she was extremely likely to become pregnant at some point, and before the recent invention of paternity tests there would be no way to tell who the father was except believing it was whoever she pointed her finger at, and so she would likely end up alone to raise a child. People thought that was a bad dea…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:15 PM
4

It's the ultimate shit test. Ask her out and if she says yes, you have the grand opportunity to pay for her dinner. If she says no, you risk being jailed for several years for sexual harrassment. Believe me, it's oh so romantic for the womenfolk. Who cares what teh menz feelz.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:47 AM
1

Eh I never hear Elizabeth Cady Stanton, one of the writers of the document, mentioned in anything but worshipful tones, and I'm pretty sure she is considered one of the founders of feminist thought.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:17 AM
5

at least from the post-war period "second wave" and onward - is simply a litany of complaints rather than analysis or proposal You mean like the Declaration of Sentiments? https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/senecafalls.asp It all started out with a list of complaints without analysis or proposals.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 08:01 AM
1

There seem to be frequent enough posts about them in this sub, at least one every few days. And those are just the ones that are discovered. EDIT: Then again, I'm probably conflating them with the posts about infanticides, but apparently men are only a slight majority of the perpetrators of those, so nearly half are committed by women as well.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 07:49 AM
5

I was referring to killing a baby within 24 hours after it's born (usually full-term), but yes, if you count abortion, it would be at least 1.2 million each year.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:45 AM
5

Good for you. This needs to be the response of men in all aspects of traditional expectations placed on men by women. If you don't accept it, women will have to change.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:13 AM
6

The feminism of Gay and Filipovic is not mainstream Haha! Good one! Yes, all of the #metoo hashtags on facebook clearly proved that this view is not going mainstream. /s
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:55 AM
9

I'd be interested to know how many neonaticides are committed every year, which are overwhelmingly committed by women. I can never find the numbers, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:46 AM
4

When women do speak up, they often seem to try to play mind games - they don't give their idea in its entirety, or they phrase it as a question. For example "What if we bought Teldar paper and anacott steel?" It's risk-aversive behavior vs risk-taking behavior. Women phrase answers in the form of questions so that it can be seen as them not being totally sure that that is the answer. If the idea doesn't go over well, it will then appear as though they too weren't sure that it was a good idea. Th…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:53 PM
2

Do we tell women this? Do we tell them they can't think of a man purely in terms of "he's just a guy I want to fuck, that's all." I kind of think not.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:46 AM
2

The reviewer apparently missed the part where most of the serial killers were viciously abused by their (single) mothers. This is discussed at length. At one point one of the FBI agents even says "It's always the mother." Unfortunately this is taken more evidence of their mysogyny. Blame women for being negligent mothers? How mysogynistic. Blame fathers for not being around? How correct. Of course, most female serial killers blame their fathers and boyfriends, etc, but no one thinks they're misa…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:54 PM
1

Not necessarily, we have different views on things now than we did back then, for example the rights and responsibilities of citizens. Our notion of who a citizen can be was based on the idea that a citizen must provide protections for the government (military service). Now our idea is that (for women) citizenship is solely an expectation that the government protects you, no reciprocal responsibilities necessary (the same is not true for men). You could say the same thing about the rights of men…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:16 PM
1

Looking beyond feminist interpretation for one. When a person says things like 'women had no rights in the 1950s', they clearly demonstrate they have no clue about actual historical events, and are simply parroting what they've been told by feminists. When you look into something that you have always trusted is true, it can be really beneficial to look at all of the evidence and come to your own conclusion.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 11:36 PM
1

it's equality, without sameness. He did his thing, she respected and valued that. She did her thing, he respected and valued that. Alex de'Tocqueville described America in a similar way in the early 1800s: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~hyper/detoc/ch3_12.htm
/r/MensRights16/11/17 11:30 PM
13

Read up on actual history. Women have always had rights, they have often been different than a man's. Both men and women have been oppressed, and one can make the argument that they have oppressed each other simply through sexual preferences and expectations, throughout history.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 05:10 AM
1

No, he did not assert this. If you're going to insist he did, then quote it. Pardon me, I thought you would have seen it in my original post: Telling a man he is too poor is obviously fine. If I need to make it more explicit: (If a man is out of a woman's league it is likely because she is ugly, and, of course, you aren't allowed to tell someone that. [If a woman is out of a man's league, it is likely because he is poor, and, of course,] telling a man he is too poor is obviously fine.) Comprende…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 07:39 PM
1

He said if a man is out of a woman's league, but you're talking about an example of a woman out of a man's league. His whole point is that they're different. He asserted that when people believe a woman is out of a man's league, it is because he is too poor. I contested his assertion by pointing out examples that show we often view a difference in physical attractiveness levels as the main reason for either sex to be 'out of someone's league.' You're in no position to declare this and it just se…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 07:00 AM
4

Yeah it occurs to me a lot when watching t.v. For example, on the Big Bang Theory, most would agree that Penny and Bernadette are way too attractive for their husbands, but you probably won't hear that about Sheldon for Amy (even though she is significantly less attractive than he is). And you can see how Penny and Bernadette use it in their marriages to have their husbands at their beck and call, "you don't want to lose me because I'm so attractive and I put up with all of your nerdy shit".
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:48 PM
5

(If a man is out of a woman's league it is likely because she is ugly, and, of course, you aren't allowed to tell someone that. Telling a man he is too poor is obviously fine.) Not really, when people say a woman is out of a man's league, they usually mean according to his looks. Think of that movie, literally titled 'She's Out of My League', and the guy says "you're a 10 and I'm a 5." He mainly meant that about the difference in their looks. Sure, when an ugly guy is a famous actor, a person pr…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:42 PM
10

make us realise we all have different types Proves the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:30 PM
17

These sniveling white knights are the real problem. They believe,and its highly reinforced by society but not by reality, that sticking up for the womenfolk is the best and only way for them to get women. They don't want to do things like play sports, get into crime, or treat women like a jerk, so therefore this is their only path and it fits so well with what they want to believe.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 08:22 PM
21

But you guys, it's only considered okay because she's "weak." Can't you see that by the way she's massively schlocking him in the jaw? /s
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:31 AM
1

Don't you know? Those women just have so much internalized misogyny and are merely acting within expected patriarchal norms. /s
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:43 AM
2

I can easily see hijab as being brought about by women, and for even more reasons than hiding away from the "evil male gaze": The Middle East is hot and women still prize pale skin there. Burqas = very good sun protection. If you go to cultures where pale skin is sought after, whether they are under Sharia law or not, women will cover themselves to the point that they might as well be wearing burqas. Increase demand to appreciate female beauty as well as limit a man's ability to be exposed to ot…
/r/MensRights30/10/17 03:33 AM
3

just to get either money or labor from me You must be a man and the 'nice guy' must have been a woman. http://nypost.com/2016/07/07/women-are-using-tinder-to-con-men-into-doing-chores/
/r/MensRights27/10/17 02:58 AM
1

I bet most women don't view it that way and see it as validation for a fantasy of theirs. And it couldn't be written about a man doing that to a woman.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:58 AM
3

I couldn't believe they used that with the 19 year old girl who 'had sex' with a 14 year old boy. Because we would totally view it that way with a 19 year old boy and a 14 year old girl....
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:55 AM
5

Kyle, also in his 30s, was convicted of raping an 11 year old girl. But he has a problem of women interpreting this as a reason for why he should want to engage in kinky sex with them, and Kyle feels like he can't say no to them. This is why we should not have men on sex offender registries. This is the lunacy of their argument. 'Pedophiles sometimes receive expectations for deviant sex and because of their guilt at what they've done, they don't feel like they can say no! Oh no!'
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:52 AM
2

Makes you understand why laws in the past didn't assign a lot of accountability to women, especially married women. They can always use the excuse of 'a man made me do it/I'm not really responsible for this.'
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:56 AM
3

How could a married woman owning property through her husband, as in her having access to all owned property through him and him being unable to sell it without her agreeing to it, make her "property"? Also, how could it be considered "equality" after the 1882 married women's property laws came about if they allowed only wives to hold property that their husbands could not access (but still had to pay the taxes for) if men could not hold property that their wives could not access?
/r/MensRights22/10/17 02:46 AM
3

Girlwriteswhat, you might find this interesting: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/08p9b8gz#page-8 It's a paper detailing a marital separation back in the 1300s, and the paper claims that cruelty had only just emerged as grounds for separation in canon law. Now, the wife accuses the husband of many grievous things, but what I found interesting about her accusation was that she included "that he treated his wife evilly and disgracefully...by beating and striking her sharply and often with punches, …
/r/MensRights18/10/17 04:18 AM
2

But this post is dealing with the specific issue of sexual assault and harassment against women - who statistically have to deal with this shit a lot more often. It's hard to know how prevalent sexual assault and harrassment is against men since they are far less likely to admit it to anyone, or perceive it as bad in the first place. So it could be completely equal since everyone, the victims and perpetrators, have a hard time recognizing assault and harassment when done to men. Just watch tv an…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:32 AM
4

I just saw on my own feed a woman talking about how men should fess up and say something like "I did and I apologize". The replies said "most will not admit because they don't realize they have even done it before". I imagine a man saying he hasn't would be bombarded with similar replies. "You probably have, you just don't even recognize it."
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:15 AM
4

Batman won't be shown beating on women because it would be oppressive and dangerous to promote violence against women You have to remember, according to feminists, male violence against women is systemic and so much more prevalent than the opposite, so therefore female on male violence just isn't that much of a problem. A good countertpoint to that is that feminists would never say that about female suicide rates compared to male suicide rates, even though the latter is far more prevalent than t…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:55 PM
14

When a woman slaps, punches, or kicks a man in a movie or t.v. show and he falls down immediately groaning in pain, this obviously does not imply that she is weak. Just the opposite, the real message that is being portrayed is "women will kick your ass, men, so don't you dare mess with them." And because the action is always portrayed as either benign or even positive, there is also an underlying message of "women are morally right to use physical violence against men". You know, to "teach 'em a…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 02:08 AM
2

Because of feminist influence, we now live in a society where many women have less choice in how they deal with work and motherhood than they did in the past. When society was built around an ideal that men should be the main breadwinners, women at most might have to engage in work for supplementary income, i.e. part-time work or work that they could engage in while at home. Now, with the influx of female workers, we do not have an economy that allows many women to either stay-at-home with their…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:28 AM
2

Right now men still have safe spaces such as video games to let that aggression and rage out That's a good example, I didn't think of that as being a venue for taking out pent up aggression.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:07 PM
3

"Muslim countries can't find a non-violent avenue for horny angry young men", i.e. this is the same sort of behavior you seen in the West historically until we decided on the "one man one women" policy and basically invented sports. Hmm, what do you think is the difference between this and what we see in the post sexual revolution West where 80% of women go for 20% of men? Even without marriage, it is similar to a polygamy type arrangement, and yet the response of the men who aren't getting sex …
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:47 AM
2

holding men accountable for women's weaknesses and then making men responsible for empowering women out of these weaknesses best definition of feminism i've ever heard.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 08:58 PM
1

You don't seem to read a lot of what I write. Like this: Yeah, except women got it a lot later. Did you not read how I said 'beginning in 1865, women began getting the right to vote'. By the time 1920 rolls around, women had full voting rights in 16 states, and the right to vote for president in 12 other states. The only remaining states were on the east coast and in the south. https://constitutioncenter.org/timeline/html/cw08_12159.html With the exception of Judaism, where a man owes his wife s…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:16 AM
1

Because it disenfranchised them for six milennia Men were not all given the right to vote in America until 1865 (for British men it wasn't until 1918). Starting in 1869, women in certain territories and states in America began voting. So that's about a difference of 4 years. The vast majority of people were disenfranchised for all of history. treated like a commodity, Why do feminists always say this? What's this supposed to mean? married off to a man by father chooses This was not legal. "FIRST…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 10:22 PM
1

Yes indeed, what causes you to believe this isn't an evolutionary strategy that women have capitalized on and perpetuated for themselves?
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:04 PM
2

But I thought feminism was only ever about equality? And why don't feminists of today oppose the draft. There's pretty much only the example of Vietnam which was pretty much just an unpopular war that everyone was against.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 08:19 PM
1

The women are wonderful effect is due to the belief that, because of their ineptitude at committing crime, they're more moral. You're getting that the wrong way around, it could only mean 'because women are more moral, they are inept at committing crime'. It doesn't make sense to say 'because women are inept at crime, they must be more moral'. This idea of whether someone is adept or inept at committing a crime doesn't really have any bearing on how we feel about their morality, it's more about …
/r/MensRights16/09/17 08:16 PM
1

False rape accusations are not a feminist issue given you lot blow this out of proportion. 2-8% at most. It is impossible to determine how many rape allegations are true and how many are false. A small percentage are demonstrably true and demonstrably false. The rest are in the category of 'we don't know'. The solution to this is not #believeallwomen. The ''Women are Wonderful'' effect is caused by beliefs that women can't commit crime as well as men. Hahahaha! I'll believe this when I see a new…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:52 PM
1

"Most of the second-wave feminists opposed the war in Vietnam and the draft" But not the draft in WWII or WWI (you know, the one that Scotus declared was an automatic expectation of being a citizen, yet feminists didn't complain when they got to be full citizens a few years after that but didn't have to take part in a draft).
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:28 PM
3

Seriously why do feminists not get that you can't claim 'feminism isn't a monolith' and then claim in the same breath 'but feminism is totally and singularly responsible for all of this great stuff'.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:20 PM
2

The two examples she used was: a woman who claims she was just an accessory to her boyfriend (it was really that evil man who did it! I was innocent!) a woman who claimed she was abused in her past (it was really that evil man who did it to me! I was just a victim!) Her conclusion was that the only reason why women are in jail or commit crimes at all is because of men. And she is the great feminist hero. Heil Hillary!
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:10 PM
1

The same would be true for women. What I really mean is that both heterosexual women and gay men date men and therefore get frustrated by men when it doesn't work out with them. The same is true for heterosexual men with women but they're not supposed to complain because that's seen as mysogyny.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 02:26 PM
1

He's just a guy that hates guys, which is weird because he's also gay. The same phenomenon going on there is the same reason heterosexual women will want to rag on guys. Because of dating and one night stands that don't work out the way the women and gay guys wanted it to. But then white knights also get in on this action by playing the 'one good man card' ("all men are trash... except me of course, I'm the one good one, so please please please date me").
/r/MensRights14/09/17 03:34 AM
5

The point is that as long as men hold the majority of power, their ideas about gender will prevail and come through in our socio-cultural biases. This should really be irrespective of sex. There are plenty of male feminists and particularly ones in politics. Shouldn't it matter more a politician's beliefs rather than their genitals? I wouldn't trust a female politician to hold my beliefs about gender simply because I am a woman.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 03:27 AM
10

I think it's pretty clear that poor women have never been very powerful unless they had stunning beauty, so in that sense the author is correct. It's not as though the women who were burned alive in the triangle shirt factory disaster were powerful. The same would be true for poor class men, they would be helpless against a factory fire or farming accident also. A beautiful woman could become the king's favorite mistress and have his son. A poor man is mostly only useful for hard labor. But main…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 02:04 PM
1

Also a focus on status and stratification of society through classes. Think of the fashion industry. It is all about demonstrating status and class (I have enough money to look this way and I have enough time to care about something so superfluous). It changes every season so that one must buy new clothes in order to be considered stylish. Mostly run by women and gay men and oftentimes styles don't even appeal to heterosexual men. I generally view the emphasis on etiquette and how lower classes …
/r/MensRights06/09/17 05:17 PM
1

An argument against patriarchy theory could be 'if women are at least equal if not superior to men, how could they let men take over in the first place?' Especially since most femnists believe in a grand pre-historic matriarchy or at least completely egalitarian nomadic tribe.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:31 PM
2

Your choice of name is very apt.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:34 PM
2

"Actually, Mom..." from a little girl? Oh, how cute! She's just developing her strong and independent personality. We need more girls like that in the world! "Actually, Mom..." from a little boy? Damn it, he's already turning into a patriarchal shitlord, better start telling him to shut up because his opinion does not need to be heard.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:34 PM
1

James Joyce is probably who you're thinking of. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/504662-my-sweet-little-whorish-nora-i-did-as-you-told
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:45 PM
1

I honestly think most feminists believe a perfect world is where men do the hard labor work (because that's what they're suited for) and women get the jobs of "higher thinking" (because in feminist's minds, this is what women are suited for).
/r/MensRights13/07/17 09:21 PM
1

Dude, when a woman has sex, she's going to know what a clitoris is whether or not someone stimulates it. Same as men getting boners.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 09:17 PM
5

Patriarchy literally means “rule of the father” and on the most basic level, refers to literal fathers having the right to direct the family Looking at most families today, I guess this means we live in a matriarchy When sons marry, they become the head of their own family and when daughters do, they come under the rule of their husbands. 'Rule' is the feminist interpretation, 'protection' is the word actually used in the law. And again, how many people find the idea of 'husbands being under the…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter