~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Of the 173.6 million women in the U.S., 171.8 million did NOT go see “Supergirl”.Word. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 12:02 PM |
| 21 | Of the 173.6 million women in the U.S., 171.8 million did NOT go see “Supergirl”.To take this stuff seriously is the equivalent of walking up to a random unhoused schizo stranger as they complain about you in a bigoted way, and then you choose to invest the effort and emotional energy to feel defensive about their completely delusional opinions. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 12:28 AM |
| 2 | 'I wear it on my middle finger': The rise of the defiant divorce ring — according to the Femosphere.Yes, that's why the more contemporary solution is issuing such benefits via EBT debit card, rather than literal stamps that can be physically exchanged. Either way, not a perfect solution, but requires that extra step of humility to “get one over” on the support provider… and the children. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/26 03:01 PM |
| 4 | 'I wear it on my middle finger': The rise of the defiant divorce ring — according to the Femosphere.I think there have been arguments for policy proposals to have child support go directly to food-stamp-esque debit cards with similar limits on what exactly can be purchased with them. Not sure if that's actually done anywhere. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/26 02:10 PM |
| 33 | 'I wear it on my middle finger': The rise of the defiant divorce ring — according to the Femosphere.My ex would take my child support money and then vacation multiple times a year and buy/license multiple purebred dogs (among other pets) with it and then complain about not having enough money, so that was cool. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/26 12:43 PM |
| 43 | 'I wear it on my middle finger': The rise of the defiant divorce ring — according to the Femosphere."I'M TOTALLY OVER HIM, OKAY?!?!?! I EVEN GOT THIS PIECE OF JEWELRY TO WEAR ALL THE TIME TO REMIND MYSELF THAT I'M TOTALLY OVER HIM!!!" | /r/MensRights | 07/07/26 12:16 PM |
| 14 | 'I wear it on my middle finger': The rise of the defiant divorce ring — according to the Femosphere.Just what the world needs... Yet more bitter and completely-overcomable pop-resentments to instead clutch onto and define oneself by. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/26 12:15 PM |
| 16 | This sub illustrates why modern women are insufferableHer being a bigot—taking her singular subjective experience with this one man and then painting the entire innate-trait demographic with the same broad, contemptuous brush—is the problem. Fug dat seksist sheeeeet | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 12:22 PM |
| 7 | Do real life Matriarchal societies pass the smell test?Unfortunately useless, because the recursive response from their apologetics would be that “Queen Victoria was embedded in the patriarchal imperialist colonizing [how many other terms can I fit in here?] culture, and if it weren't for men—not just a culture wrought of the human condition and the arising behavior from the amassing of power, but a culture specifically plotted and constructed by men, for men—she would never have done so.” All rhetorical routes lead to “it b man's fault”. One is eit… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/26 02:09 PM |
| 4 | How to not hate women?If you are going to protest or fight against the unfair and myopic bigotry that you see other groups believe and perform against you, then you should first fight against that very same unair and myopic bigotry-propensity within yourself. Your first step is to comprehend that the innate characteristics of an individual or a demographic does not dictate their moral value or their position on some good-v-evil scale. Spoiler alert: if you are hating on an individual or demographic based on their inn… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/26 04:36 PM |
| 3 | Utah woman who wrote book on grief gets life without parole for killing husband | US crimeUnsurprising as Ⓐ she was guilty, and Ⓑ her attorney was complete garbage to the point of being near-comedic. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/26 04:57 PM |
| 14 | Two feminists aggressively debunk CNN’s 62 million articleIt was amazing and disturbing to read the infinite scroll of bias-confirmed social media commenters lose their absolute minds about this article, completely convinced and evangelizing to others that the equivalent of ⅓ of the American male population really were members of an online rape group. “It really IS all men!” they theatrically screeched at their fellow choir members. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/26 09:49 PM |
| 8 | Two feminists aggressively debunk CNN’s 62 million articleLuckily for CNN, it's currently fashionable to be hatefully propagandistic towards a veeeeeeeery select cluster of intersecting demographics. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/26 09:49 PM |
| 33 | Two feminists aggressively debunk CNN’s 62 million articleIt's official: radfems are so unhinged that they've forced me in a position where I actually agree with Taylor Lorenz about something. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/26 06:43 PM |
| 2 | I've been watching a lot of horror short movies on youtube and the gynocentrism is definitely one of the more common themesA notable portion of present-day filmmaking is certainly going to have that on-the-nose virtue signaling, of course, because so much of contemporary media as a whole is saturated with that propagandistic flavor. It's a cultural zeitgeist that is still riding a high wave, and it is making so much “creative” output feel like the stuffy, churchy/culty, “conservative” productions from back in the day, with all their ideological apologetics having to be stuffed into every written nook, rather than be… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/26 05:41 PM |
| 6 | "It's not all men, but it's always a man"I see. What was the reason you typed “Are we comparing infanticide (which happens about 500 times a year in the US) to sexual assault (which is so common around 1/2 of women and 1/6 of men experience it in their lifetime)?” What was it that were you trying to specifically illuminate there by comparing commonality rates of the respective crimes? My assumption was that you were comparing based on rates-of-crimes-committed in order to find irrelevance in infanticide being mentioned at all. There ar… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 03:45 PM |
| 8 | In 2011 feminist launched hoax that 300,000 girls in the US, average age 13, were enslaved for sex (implying millions of pedophile rapists). What is happening today is not new.Here's the study ↴ https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08862605261432630 | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 02:59 PM |
| 9 | "It's not all men, but it's always a man"No, I was interpreting your comment as a challenge regarding frequency of certain violent crimes being relevant, but frequency was not the point. I do not believe that anyone was arguing that infanticide somehow “cancels out” sexual assault or “competes” with it in terms of priority-to-address. The point is that "it's always a man" is an intentionally-inflammatory categorical claim that rhetorically genders the entire responsibility of the totality of violent crime. Women being the primary perpe… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 06:06 AM |
| 3 | Problems with modern dating, Men not approaching women, female behavioral statistics and more.I got chunks of thesauruses in my stool! | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 12:40 AM |
| 17 | "It's not all men, but it's always a man"One would assume that the more severe, high-level violent crimes—resulting in the finality of death—are less frequent than other violent crimes. A 2024 FBI data cull showed that murder occurred on average every 31.1 minutes, while a [reported] rape—not generalized sexual assault, but rape—occurred every 4.1 minutes. I think the point that was being attempted is that the “…always a…” rhetoric is intentionally inflammatory—thanks, gender wars—and ultimately pedagogically dishonest. The problem of … | /r/MensRights | 19/04/26 11:41 PM |
| 16 | Problems with modern dating, Men not approaching women, female behavioral statistics and more.I think that one huge factor is that the courting instincts of both sexes are being systematically exploited [often for profit] to exponentially worsening levels in the online environment, and it is making people miserable. Below, I'll exaggerate what the individual unconsciously perceives to make my point. From a man's perspective, online courting/dating presents as extreme scarcity in what appears to be an empty void lacking in viable or meaningful romantic opportunities. The male instinctive … | /r/MensRights | 19/04/26 07:14 PM |
| 21 | "It's not all men, but it's always a man"Yes, it is bigoted. They excuse it by way of the intersectionality hierarchy. By way of their rhetoric, this "excuses" those in their ideology to be bigoted towards a very specific several intersecting demographics based on their innate characteristics. The intersectionality hierarchy is why the “not all 𝑥 but always an 𝑥” doesn't work with those with this belief system. What's interesting is that they actually use this same hierarchy to hobble one another and cut one another down if they can. I… | /r/MensRights | 19/04/26 05:03 PM |
| 3 | A man wrote this 🤦♂️Agreed. It's a post from the individual's private Facebook account, apparently. It's like walking up to a random schizoid on Fentanyl Avenue and then voluntarily fretting about his worldview. Ragebait at best. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/26 04:08 PM |
| 15 | A man wrote this 🤦♂️It is activist/influencer pick-me energy, for sure—our broader and more-contemporary “Uncle Tom” designation, I guess. No one but the activistic terminally-online propagandists would suggest such things. The intersectionality hierarchy, which is a foundation of much of this rhetoric—and therefore allows for and encourages bigotry by design—places cis white men at the tippy-top of dominance/power/oppressiveness. Ideologues that employ this then round all individuals of their innate-trait demograp… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/26 11:06 PM |
| 8 | A man wrote this 🤦♂️Cite the source. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/26 10:56 PM |
| 16 | Sperm Donation is Anti-MaleBut then what would you eat? | /r/MensRights | 18/04/26 05:46 PM |
| 3 | Has there ever been a class action lawsuit against Reddit for discrimination against men.Are you getting "striked" by Reddit the platform, or banned by certain subs by the mods of those subs? | /r/MensRights | 17/04/26 01:40 PM |
| 1 | Why is it widely accepted and even encouraged for young women to get cosmetic procedures like breast implants, lip fillers, or nose jobs, yet when men pursue comparable aesthetic enhancements, they often face disproportionate ridicule, backlash, or hostility. What explains this double standard?I would argue that aesthetic standards are reinforced societally by the sum of the sexes. There are checks-and-balances homeostatic centers for each sex's respective aesthetics that the collective tries to pull individuals towards, and both sexes police individuals of both sexes, via praise and criticism, to unconsciously bucket-crab one another back towards that aesthetic homeostasis. I would agree that women have a specific sexually-competitive arms race in cosmetic augmentation that men do no… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/26 06:45 PM |
| 0 | Why is it widely accepted and even encouraged for young women to get cosmetic procedures like breast implants, lip fillers, or nose jobs, yet when men pursue comparable aesthetic enhancements, they often face disproportionate ridicule, backlash, or hostility. What explains this double standard?Good examples, though non-invasive solutions like hairpieces/wigs aren't what I was thinking of via the examples in OP's post, but that makes sense to include them, I think. I can see this as a ridicule gap, for sure. I'll ramble off what I'm seeing, and I'll focus on cultures that appear in the West from here on out. Women seem to be much more broadly expected to augment/modify their appearance cosmetically, and are judged on the execution of it, while men seem to be expected not to substantial… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/26 06:19 PM |
| -3 | Why is it widely accepted and even encouraged for young women to get cosmetic procedures like breast implants, lip fillers, or nose jobs, yet when men pursue comparable aesthetic enhancements, they often face disproportionate ridicule, backlash, or hostility. What explains this double standard?Can you offer examples of analogous procedures that would display this disparity in “hostility”? From what I've seen, the artificialization of one's physical features is going to attract the easy ridicule along with some praise, regardless of sex. Not being snarky. Genuinely curious. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/26 03:14 PM |
| 4 | "It’s not all men but it's always a man"That's the intersectionality grievance hierarchy at play. Since “men” or “white men” are the “most privileged” innate-characteristics demographic(s), then by linguistic legerdemain, they smuggle the implicit suggestion that every individual of said demographic(s) is/are privileged. They will deny that to your face and tell you that “of course we don't think every white man is more privileged than every other person of every other demo” and they will whataboutism-pivot to the specifically-unique … | /r/MensRights | 16/04/26 04:05 AM |
| 1 | "It’s not all men but it's always a man"They want you to virtue signal with them and be a conduit for their rhetoric, or else you are “the enemy”. The rhetorical slogan "It’s not all men but it's always a man" is their litmus test to decide if you are a docile “ally” that will simply guzzle the histrionic kool-aid and echo their talking points without any concern for objectivity or rational comprehension… because if you don't do that, and you even slightly push back on this completely hyperbolic and intentionally-inflammatory rhetoric… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/26 03:32 AM |
| 1 | Wondering if the Patriarchy was made for good reasons and adopted consensuallyRe: the "Not all" caveat, unfortunately in any sub ascribed to the “gender war”, this one included, that does need to be explicitly stated, as a means of being sure one is on semantic agreement on that, if nothing else. This is means to a “handshake”. Glad you agree! If your term “societal response” can include anything that can be distilled to “men laying down rules for women while they held positions of power”—rules which led to a “benefit to women” baby that came along with any “oppressive” b… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 04:59 PM |
| 2 | Wondering if the Patriarchy was made for good reasons and adopted consensuallyAmen. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 04:01 PM |
| 0 | Wondering if the Patriarchy was made for good reasons and adopted consensuallyI believe I am engaging directly, as I argue my suggestion that no early society could have collectively, consciously decided to restrain women for stability. I argue that “disruption” is something that is not gender-specific, and that you choose to scrutinize the female-performed variety of it, alone, to make your case. I argue that, via the confirmation bias resulting from viewing contemporary gender-wars media, to frame the feminist-defined “patriarchy” as benevolent-for-all is to already acc… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 03:32 PM |
| 4 | Wondering if the Patriarchy was made for good reasons and adopted consensuallyYou need to stop looking at sexist rhetoric—the "and she wonders why men won't date her" videos, for example—as a leading question that sets you up to have to defend or deny their claim based on their premises. Your thesis is flawed from out the gate, in doing so. Unhingedness is not partial to a specific sex. The sexes may display it differently, by and large*, but spend a single hour browsing this sub and you'll see plenty of “angry, vindictive, and unhinged” nuthouse takes that have little-to… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 02:56 PM |
| 6 | My questions to men as a 15 year old male who was raised (and have been around) females for my entire lifeNo one should be looking at the victimhood between innate-trait demographics as a competition… as a hierarchy on which to deem one demographic better or worse than the other. What is within each demographic are individuals with diverse lived experiences. Individuals who probably need—if not deserve—understanding, support, compassion, comradery. It doesn't even matter if there are 99% evil, violent, irredeemable members of that demographic on planet Earth—the respectable and benign 1% of that dem… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/26 03:45 AM |
| 4 | "Day of Male Silence" Idea for a silent protest.No thanks. I like having a functional infrastructure. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/26 02:02 AM |
| 2 | "Day of Male Silence" Idea for a silent protest.What if they jumped off a bridge, establishing it as proper and acceptable behavior? | /r/MensRights | 09/04/26 02:01 AM |
| 2 | Women who hate men: Study finds similarities in gendered hate speech on RedditCorrectamundo | /r/MensRights | 07/04/26 10:21 PM |
| 7 | Women who hate men: Study finds similarities in gendered hate speech on RedditRegarding point 2, I believe that they wouldn't admit to it so quickly if their ideology [and that particular extremist rhetoric within it] wasn't considered as trendy and “so hot right now” among the perspectival social majority. They will openly express bigotry against men among their “yas kweeen” acolytes, but when pressed hard enough, they will often retreat to the fortified rational principles of liberal egalitarianism (the “excuse”). In doing so, they will clutch their pearls, pointing aro… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/26 08:42 PM |
| 3 | Feminism is a mask-wearing Cluster B ideologyI suppose my main point is that the analogy is a helpful one, especially if one can use this as a lens through which to see all fundamentalist ideologies that greatly favor warped, exaggerated rhetoric and propagandistic appeals-to-emotion, and will punish efforts to apprehend objective reality by way of empirical research in any way that would wound the ideological goals. By this, a fundamentalist ideology is prejudiced by design. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/26 03:28 AM |
| 4 | Feminism is a mask-wearing Cluster B ideologyThat's a good and interesting framing in a lot of ways. Cluster B disorders are “protective complexes” that the individual's neurology has constructed to keep the individual from suffering a trauma that they may have incurred in early life. This complex warps the individual's apprehension of the world, of other people, and of their own identity in that context… their own unconscious apprehension of reality is skewed into a fiction that suits the individual's “phenomenological survival” in this w… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/26 03:14 AM |
| 4 | Watch how a male victim gets bashed for highlighting how feminism hurts men.My bad! Morning brain. Comment removed. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/26 12:19 PM |
| -1 | Double Standard?Holy moly, maybe this post is April Fools. Are we really having to scrape the bottom of the barrel to resort to a reaching critique of [to be sarcastic for a spell] trendy and zeitgeist-leading 21st-century cultural tastemaker, Dear Abby? From only the context above—and I mean that; try and step outside the uncharitable strawman picture you're constructing and read the literal words and not what your overactive hypervigilance is framing it as—do you really think that if a male virgin were writin… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/26 04:35 PM |
| 9 | False SA allegationI am so sorry. Wishing you the best of luck and great success in this! Some say you haven't truly lived until you've been falsely accused of assault by an ex. To this day, my borderline personality ex will post on her social media about how I physically/psychologically/emotionally/sexualy abused her during our marriage ~18 years ago... she will specifically tell people—including our own children—that I even choked her… those words. I never laid an abusive hand on her. Quite the contrary, when I … | /r/MensRights | 31/03/26 01:15 AM |
| 1 | I need helpThe first mistake—not you that was making it, but them—is to make the grievances of the human population a fucking competition of “who can be the smuggest victim?” and then round everyone of that specific sex or race or etc. into that description. An individual suffers and fights the hard battle. A demographic statistic is not the experience of an individual. The goobers who pull this semantic cup-and-balls trick will apply some broad statistic to each and every individual of that demographic. T… | /r/MensRights | 30/03/26 11:36 PM |
| 17 | How come whenever men mention being s*xually assaulted, people always have to bring up that women are "assaulted more often" and try to downplay mens assaults instead of just being supportive?It's a whataboutism aspect of the radical feminist portion of intersectionality rhetoric. They take broad and generalized statistics about demographics of people based on their innate traits (sex, race, etc.) and they incorrectly and purposefully apply those statistics to each and every individual of that generalized demographic. So, say that a study shows that there are 37 incidents of sexual assault per 1,000 women compared to 5 per 1,000 men. Using the intersectional grievance hierarchy, this… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 01:50 AM |
| 10 | I see an increased amount of "white men" being used as a categorisation on hereIt's easy to address this: don't refer to a demographic that is based on its innate characteristics—race, sex, etc.—in your descriptor when, charitably, what you actually mean to define is a cultural/systemic behavior or attribute. It could not get more easier than that. White privilege does not befall all white people in their specific and individual lives. These “privileges” of a majority demographic of a particular location or cultural expression do exist, but to identify this privilege by a … | /r/MensRights | 23/03/26 08:59 PM |
| 27 | Help me not become a misogynistDon't make a scapegoat out of an entire demographic that is based on its innate characteristics when it is an ideology that you are protesting. Do not be a bigot. If you allow yourself to be a bigot, just as the women are who halfheartedly mask their own bigotry against men behind the legitimate virtues of egalitarian feminism, then you are just in a race to the bottom with them, and offer nothing of positive substance to you or your loved ones or the world at large. Fight the urge to join the s… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/26 02:49 AM |
| 13 | “You are not attractive for posting here” “You are an Incel”."Allow me to scold your broad generalizations of a group, reducing all its individuals to the worst examples therin, by making broad generalizations of your group, reducing all its individuals to the worst examples therein." | /r/MensRights | 21/03/26 12:45 AM |
| 4 | Women aren't entitled to anythingThat's not what the golden rule is, though. The golden rule does not justify mirroring hurtful behavior. If I am taking you by what you wrote here, you're turning what is a principle for your own actions into [entitled] expectation of how others should treat you. Of course one shouldn't prioritize others at one's own expense (boundaries!) but know that it isn't a black-or-white polarization between either “unconditional love” or treating someone like “unworthy trash”; and to expect unconditional… | /r/MensRights | 20/03/26 04:32 PM |
| 5 | Women aren't entitled to anythingThrough that same lens, are you entitled to anything? | /r/MensRights | 20/03/26 03:17 PM |
| 1 | 手牽著手太過於浪漫，被逐出伊甸園是很棒的典故，我看見更多是冷峻和直視，即使希望也是清冷的月光The fact that you're asking reveals you already recognized something. If it were truly meaningless abstraction, you wouldn't need me to name it. This just doesn't make any sense. I could say “diaper rubber donkey miff maff!” to you, and when you rightfully ask “What are you talking about? That's nonsense!” I cannot then rationally turn to you and say “Well the fact that you're asking reveals you already recognized something. If it were truly meaningless abstraction, you wouldn't need me to name … | /r/MensRights | 18/03/26 06:20 PM |
| 3 | 手牽著手太過於浪漫，被逐出伊甸園是很棒的典故，我看見更多是冷峻和直視，即使希望也是清冷的月光I'm being a bit rude here, OP, but this is some GPT 我才14歲，但這很有深度 mumbo jumbo right here. Much of what is identified here as some kind of contemporary erosion of society are just expressions of timeless human behavior and of community, regardless of value judgement. Power coalesces upwards, as the 80/20 rule is “built in” to human sociology. It's not good but it certainly isn't new. Seeing obedience as virtue and questioning as heretical is on an evergreen spectrum of severity and is an aspect of… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/26 02:45 PM |
| 0 | How to live in this misandric world?For sure. Reddit has all kinds of silly topics and serious topics for conversation. It's a conversation platform, after all! So, when I want to take something seriously, I may… you know… go on a bit. I think writing helps someone think and understand what they might be intuiting [or denying] abstractly. They might write about their feelings and beliefs, and if they are honest with themselves and steelmanning ideas they may disagree with, they can even realize, in the writing process, that they w… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/26 07:03 PM |
| 1 | How to live in this misandric world?To briefly return with some clarifications: The reason that the spectrum of feminist or quasi-feminist rhetoric or intent—from bigotedly-malicious to earnestly-positive—is relevant here is due to the overarching belief that “Patriarchy” entails. The root of it, itself, is poisoned semantically, from descriptor down. Though there are many of those well-meaning—who sincerely wish to make the world better for everyone, give or take—who use the term and many of its nested principles and rhetorical p… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/26 06:29 PM |
| 2 | How to live in this misandric world?Here are the main criticisms that I think you are running into here. I mean to direct my attention on the ideas and rhetoric and not at you, personally—meaning that I will be calling out other aspects of “the discourse” that you are not necessarily defending or debating. I'll get deep in the weeds here, and I often piss off both edgy ends of this Feminist←→MRA ideological spectrum doing so, so bear with me, as I might have to daisy-chain a few comments to one another below if Reddit barfs at the… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/26 03:49 PM |
| 4 | How to live in this misandric world?The world is not misandrist. The world is indifferent. And rejoice, for the world has always been indifferent to our struggles. The world has always been trying to eat our kind, bones and all. To merely exist is to fight against entropy until your heart finally gives out, hopefully at a ripe old satisfied age. The world has always been the misuse of the 99% of us by the greedy and sociopathic 1%. Humanity has mutually “objectified” the sexes since before humanity. Hominids “objectified” the sexe… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/26 09:38 PM |
| 15 | Do bad actors make it harder for people to take men’s rights seriously?Yes. This is the era where the extremist activistic types are the empty cans making the most noise. Moderate, rational voices are drowned out by the histrionic and the dogmaticly polarized. No one can hardly get a coherent point across before some unhinged useful bigot or ideological propagandist starts using the point as a means of derailing whatever sincere and charitable conversation or social effort was being engaged in. I'll also add that it is a very easy thing to fall into, to generalize … | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 02:02 AM |
| 1 | Why do women suddenly block me when seriously dating or being good friends with them for literal no reason ?Hopefully, it doesn't need to be said, but you mustn't assume that two-ish bad experiences define the behavioral totality of a specific innate-trait demographic. An immature, cruel, or socially-inept few do not speak on behalf of an entire population. We're all primed to paint our own lived experience over your stories, but there are important and clarifying questions that I have, which I don't expect you to answer (not my business), which muddies how I might perceive your experiences or perceiv… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/26 04:01 PM |
| 3 | Why do some women genuiely believes that "men can't struggle, because women struggle more"?It's the same issue we see in all activistic and/or bigoted social agendas when statistics of a demographic ironically count more towards understanding lived experience than the lived experience of a real-life individual. Humanity is too diverse in experience to have to compete with one another on “struggle”. When one uses these broad and generalized statistics to find where the minority demographics and majority demographics are, then one can misuse that data to apply that statistical compariso… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/26 03:31 PM |
| 16 | They're the same people whom they hateWell put, OP. The comments in that post were something else. They are emboldened by their consensus of bigotry and mask it as virtue. Humans being human. Same as it ever was. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/26 05:40 AM |
| 3 | Show People How Much They Need MenYes, and I admit that I tried above to swing my semantic lasso too wide just to find some consensus there because I felt I "got the gist". I personally draw distinction between “feminist” and “radical feminist”, and even that is sticky, because the “denominations” of an ideology get a bit muddy under even those umbrella terms. The true misandrists—whom I consider the “caricatures” I mentioned—that smugly, barely nest their contempt of men within the virtue of feminism, are hiding in plain sight … | /r/MensRights | 24/02/26 03:19 PM |
| 2 | Show People How Much They Need MenThanks for the motte/bailey correction! I edited it. I do discern between feminist and radical feminist, myself, so we're using different definitions there. I'm saying that the call to an action of protest which intends to slight-by-omission a subset of an innate-trait demographic but only targets that innate-trait demographic is, by definition, prejudiced. I suppose where my whinging is ultimately irrelevant is that, boots on the ground, I don't really understand the context of where men would … | /r/MensRights | 24/02/26 01:25 AM |
| 2 | Show People How Much They Need MenI'll stick to my point and say that “random women” is a broad buckshot blast that misses [what I would claim to be] the intended [and deserving] target of criticism and conflict: contemptuous radfem zealots that consider their prejudice against men a virtue. There is collateral damage when a movement pushes individuals to see their outgroup as “all the same thing”, disparagingly, and there is collateral damage when a subsection of an outgroup is targeted which may only overlap with the intended … | /r/MensRights | 24/02/26 01:00 AM |
| -1 | Show People How Much They Need MenSooooooo an ad hominem courtier's reply instead of addressing my question. Nothing of value was lost, I suppose, and I accept your opt-out. Be well. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 08:19 PM |
| 2 | Show People How Much They Need MenI just don't get it. I thought one of the biggest complaints and most-exposed rhetorical weaknesses about radfems was their completely irrational and disparaging generalizing of an entire gender. But here we are, simply showing how easy it is to get caught in the same old prejudicial trap of rounding an outgroup to their worst examples. That blindly-overcompensation pendulum be a-swingin'. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 08:07 PM |
| -5 | Show People How Much They Need MenOk, thanks. Then we agree in the “they”. I'll happily continue being myself and working to add my light to the sum of light rather than let prejudicial zealots turn me into the same kind of caricature that they are. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 06:48 PM |
| 0 | Show People How Much They Need MenHappy to change my mind. Explain. Prove me wrong! Maybe we agree! Apologies for using too many words to hold your interest. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 06:33 PM |
| -11 | Show People How Much They Need MenDefine “they” and maybe we'll find out that we agree. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 06:30 PM |
| 0 | Show People How Much They Need MenAre you sure? You chose to use argument from incredulity to completely sidestep the point I am making. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 06:29 PM |
| 1 | Show People How Much They Need MenIf you choose to be the polar opposite of a irrational doomer, then the opposite side of that ideological horseshoe will be… ta daa… irrational doomer. You've already established that you are running on the “has never and will never exist” mindset. That is why the city on a hill is an ideal. It is the North Star that you'll never reach but directs your way, all the same. Because of this difference in perspective between us, anything I have left to say will be irrelevant. You can have a “philosop… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 06:20 PM |
| -10 | Show People How Much They Need MenThe counter argument is against the nature of your philosophy and of your practice. You argue that because of systemic discrimination, then it is fair to counter-discriminate against a demographic based on their innate characteristics. You do not argue to challenge the systemic discrimination in of itself. You are pushing the burden of that systemic discrimination on the totality of a demographic based on their innate characteristics. Does that sound familiar to you? Does that sound obtusely wro… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 05:54 PM |
| 8 | Show People How Much They Need MenKeep that kindness fire lit ✊🏼 | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 05:04 PM |
| 3 | Show People How Much They Need MenThis is recursive reasoning. The question was “is bigotry acceptable if a member of one demographic is unkind to you?” and your answer was essentially “bigotry is acceptable if a member of one demographic is unkind to you". You didn't add anything here. You simply pointed to bad examples of one innate-characteristic demographic behaving bigotedly, and stated “see?” You see a selection of an innate-characteristic demographic acting bigoted, and you use that to justify your own bigotry. “Heterofat… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 05:03 PM |
| 3 | Show People How Much They Need MenThe reasoning is essentially "But they started it, mom!" | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 04:30 PM |
| -2 | Show People How Much They Need MenSo, do I have it correct that you believe it's a good and just thing to discriminate against and negatively disparage an entire demographic based on their innate characteristics? | /r/MensRights | 23/02/26 03:59 PM |
| 3 | Support for men's rightsIn Canada, there's the Canadian Centre for Men and Families, a mental health and social service charity. They offer services including support groups, legal aid, sheltering for abused men and children, and others. https://www.menandfamilies.org | /r/MensRights | 17/02/26 08:36 PM |
| 4 | Why isn't there an ideology or political/social movement for men? The patriarchal system harms us the most. It places an unbearable burden on men's shoulders. Feminism is a system that tries to correct the part of the patriarchal system that harms women. There is no ideology that defends us.The “movement” to strive for is classic liberalism. To rise above a discrimination, the answer is not an overcorrecting reverse discrimination. To fight discrimination with discrimination is simply to continue to feed the problem rather than remedy it. We must see each individual as worthy of sovereignty and value, regardless of which demographic of biological/phenotypic traits they belong to. If you can reach it ethically in this lottery game of life we all find ourselves in, it is yours. We mu… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/26 05:40 PM |
| 2 | What does feminist actually mean?I would suggest a broad investigation from different existing sources. Since it is a social movement, investigate what feminists and accepted feminist organizations of different varieties use as their definition, and then compare that to the definition used by those who disagree with aspects of it, or those who are spiteful about it. It's all out there. You want to learn what the zealots say, the moderates, and the “heretics” who speak out against it—the whole spectrum must be apprehended, if yo… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/26 05:28 PM |
| 19 | Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlashIn the sense that whatever activistic social movements result from this will also be broad-brush point-missing misdirections, then my guess would be yes. Watch as this issue is used by propagandist and useful idiot alike to shadowbox the usual vague and faceless [and therefore, ultimately unconquerable] enemies: political party (as each of the binary red/blue parties go on to blame the whole of this on the other), gender demographic (I won't link it, but there's already an opportunistic goober o… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/26 02:36 AM |
| 0 | TeaOnHer response from MovemberThe downvotes you are getting really signals the unfortunately-prevalent embittered mental illness in this sub. Folks really think they can be cruel, derogatory, and resentful, and then expect the world they construct once they accomplish their mission to be one joyful and healthy to live in. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 03:00 PM |
| 4 | TeaOnHer response from MovemberSomething I've realized about the online disparaging of one's reputation is really haunting me. As social primates, to be rejected from one's community would, across the hominid epochs, almost always lead to one's death. Until the centralized social Web 2.0, human culture/society/community was decentralized by geographic location, alone. Now, the Global Village is congealing virtually, more and more. We can now communicate and share information with anyone across the globe in 4K. In the past, a … | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 02:56 PM |
| -2 | At this point, I straight up cannot support these people. (Read Desc)Word. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/25 08:01 PM |
| -8 | At this point, I straight up cannot support these people. (Read Desc)Who do you mean by “these people”, specifically? | /r/MensRights | 25/05/25 08:00 PM |
| 2 | What's the real cause of misandry nowadays?I've been processing some of the things you said, but will respond here when I can. I have a draft saved in a text file, ha! | /r/MensRights | 06/03/25 06:58 PM |
| 4 | What's the real cause of misandry nowadays?I'm off to bed, but I want to ponder and thoughtfully reply once I'm fresh and able in the new day! | /r/MensRights | 04/03/25 05:04 AM |
| 7 | What's the real cause of misandry nowadays?I can sadly say that I've attempted to charitably argue this, but it becomes the double-talk motte-and-bailey situation that I teased above: When asked to defend why [to use the extreme contemporary boogeyman,] the nebulous and statistical “straight white male” must step aside and not “fight his own noble fight” for employment/education/sustenance/resources (the bailey), it is determined that it is “misogynistic” to do so, because what historically has been statistically his must be surrendered … | /r/MensRights | 04/03/25 02:40 AM |
| 22 | What's the real cause of misandry nowadays?Men's worth is not declining, far from it. The world was never fair or just, though we can strive for a society that strives for this. There were always creepers and swindlers prowling the peripheries of one's sovereignty, wanting to stab us in our backs, extorting, exploiting what they can. What has changed is how trendy it has become to strangely, contemptuously partition people based on their innate traits. We in developed society were getting over this primitive issue, but now it is being re… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/25 09:47 PM |
| 3 | Message to clothing companiesIn many areas of life, we need to learn the difference between what we can control and what we cannot control—that line tends to ethically land around our own self. So, do you think you can practice some ownership of your own behavior and practice not looking at the shirts? Since graphic tees will continue to be produced, purchased, and worn, it is now up to you to adjust your own behavior and adapt. T-shirt quotes aren't a deep well of wisdom, anyway, yes? | /r/MensRights | 21/02/25 04:08 PM |
| 22 | Police Got Called On 3 Men For Flirting With Women | MEN FLIRTING Is Now ILLEGAL In 2025?Garbage video, garbage commentary. The commentator never shows the "flirting" activity that leads to the police call. We see the police approaching and interacting with the three men. That's it. No actual sign of what actually took place. The commentator finds what took place "diabolical" yet can't actually show the activity that led to the police call, or provide the full source video so that we can view what other context might be gleaned, or even name the content creators that recorded themse… | /r/MensRights | 31/01/25 01:03 PM |
| 2 | You guys are gonna LOVE this one.You may not like my answer, but perhaps you can own what you can here so that a future interaction might go better for you, if you were actually looking for helpful information in your attempted post on their sub, and not just leaping in there looking for a self-justifying outcome: Your grave mistake was aggressively taking your personal pain out on complete strangers simply because they belong to the same broad identity group as your friend's harassers—Do you see how that can be a problem, taki… | /r/MensRights | 30/01/25 11:10 PM |
| 3 | Woman I Work With Does Not Let Men Hild Open door For HerYes, if you slam a door in someone's face, it's definitely their fault. jfc. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/24 11:55 AM |
| 16 | Being a man sucks and women are awfulOP, in another reply here, you listed the following "mental illness" traits (your words) about yourself: anxiety OCD depression tinitus tremors bipolar PTSD from the tornado and car wreck mentally can't stay at a job for more than 5 months literally got fired because [you] had to leave [your] last job because of a anxiety attack That is a lot on your shoulders, and I sympathize, but for you to go on this strange rant, blaming the “awfulness” of your life on the 50% of the human population that h… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/24 12:23 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter