TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wagesj45 Archive

View 2 posts and 138 comments by wagesj45 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-7

I'm not disagreeing with that. I'm just saying that it isn't a completely fabricated phenomena and that it does present different depending on which group is experiencing it.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 06:19 PM
-9

That's not at all what I'm describing though. I'm a software engineer and I when I have conversations with friends and colleagues on technical matters, we rehash the same concepts over and over all the time. It's the superiority and disdain conveyed that's the issue, not the subject matter. Like the disdain in your comment, for example.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 06:12 PM
-16

On the one hand, mansplaining as widely understood certainly does happen, especially in male dominated fields, and must be infuriating for accomplished and knowledgeable women to endure. On the other hand, the same phenomena exists in reverse for topics women feel they have some innate better understanding of, especially parsing emotions. As long as differences between genders exist, real or perceived, gendersplaining will be an annoyance we all have to live with. Hell, you can probably extend t…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 05:19 PM
5

people get so focused on their specific problems they often miss the bigger picture. the truth is, our problems are interconnected. it's not a zero sum game; when we start unraveling the knot of issues for one group, we start loosening the thread for everyone else.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:32 PM
6

this problem y’all are worried about this sounds kind of trivializing. maybe you didn't mean it that way. to some degree or another this will manifest and be a problem for people. that being said you're absolutely right. just because men have our own set of problems doesn't mean we should not be out there loudly advocating for the rights of every other group. and i suspect a great number of us will.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:27 PM
4

Consistently is not the same as constantly. Maybe we give her the benefit of the doubt and assume she doesn't like being ignored for long periods of time? I'd imagine there are plenty of self-absorbed Chads out there that only come around when they're ready to bone.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/20 05:28 PM
8

you sure seem to spend a lot of time in this sub to hate it so much 🤔
/r/MensRights24/10/19 04:40 PM
5

You could definitely work for a ballot initiative to repeal the law, but in order to sue you have to have standing, which means the law had to affect you directly.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:10 AM
11

Where did it say that?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/18 04:59 PM
2

Fetish
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/01/18 07:34 AM
5

Yeah. Even in the responses to my comment, people are getting defensive over the semantics.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 02:36 PM
124

My guess is that the other 58% didn't want to sound weak to the interviewer. Honestly I'd be surprised if I met a person, male or female, that honestly hadn't thought about it at one point or another. It's a pretty human thing, I think.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:43 AM
1

I was worried about that. Not sarcasm though.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:20 PM
29

That's it, boys. Close 'er down. The entire problem has been summed up as best as it can be. Bad behavior stemming from not getting the attention they think they deserve but aren't receiving.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:12 AM
1

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:21 PM
2

That it is bigger than KSU.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:32 AM
1

I had the opposite experience. My advisor was the department chair, and he had absolutely zero knowledge of what was going on, what classes were needed, when they'd be available, how to apply to graduate... The list goes on. He did seem passionate about the few classes he taught, though.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:31 AM
2

Nope. It's just that I thought that phrase was hilarious.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:56 AM
5

pussy-value conspiracy kek
/r/MensRights02/02/15 11:12 PM
5

Absolutely she shouldn't compromise her standards. She's entitled to them. If she did, not only would she be disappointed, but it would be quite evident to him that he didn't measure up. Bad news. However, she should also be prepared for no one to ever meet her standards and to be forever alone.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:40 AM
3

Depends on the field you're working in. In my area, software developers have their pick of good jobs and you continue getting calls long after you're hired.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 03:27 PM
2

I've always thought that people can be more than one thing. Care about issues unique to women? Great, you're a feminist. Care about issues unique to men? Great, you're a masculinist. Can't you be both? This isn't a game with winners and losers. At least it doesn't have to be. Also, I don't think masculinist is a word. But you get my point.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:30 AM
5

Is that really so bad though? I don't think a women's advocacy program would be bad if men had the societal approval of our own advocacy group. Equality is a great goal and can be met in a lot of ways, but there are some differences between the two groups which lend themselves to advocacy. It doesn't always have to be at someone else's expense either. I really think we can pursue our own interests respectively and still not have to "beat" the other group.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:34 PM
5

Welp. All you have to do now is grab some popcorn, have a seat, and wait for the eventual fireworks as this whole thing blows up in her face.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:21 PM
7

"I do that all the time." -wagesj45, 2013
/r/MensRights28/12/13 10:15 PM
0

Nah, sounds like they were needlessly confrontational. Why say all of that when they could have simply addressed the question "why are no women present on the panel?" No need to poke at someone like that. I don't care if there was an onslaught of crazy or not, that isn't an excuse to go crazy yourself. If you want to be taken seriously, that is.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:00 AM
1

The nutters will always let you down.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:18 PM
2

I think you get into a murky and dangerous territory when you start attributing sexual attraction and personal interests to malice. Also, I think the bullying issue is much more human that it is gender biased. I could be wrong. But that's my observation so far, anyway.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 06:28 PM
2

Right for the most part, but I don't attribute it to misandry. Its just that when people are young and impressionable, they're usually driven by baser instincts that they don't fully understand, much less control. The big and strong males used to survive and provide; it seems natural to gravitate to those types when young (and sometimes into adulthood). The thing that makes females dislike things nerdy is what makes males dislike what's nerdy. Its not a problem with women, its a problem with peo…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:12 PM
11

I was interested in computers since I was three, but I never learned how to program until my first year of college in pursuit of a computer science degree. I never had anyone in my small town that shared my passion for computing except for my grandfather, and he didn't know the first thing about programming either. But I'm a good programmer because I put the effort into learning how to think like a computer scientist. I was never in it for the money. I think I'm proof that you don't have to prog…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:06 PM
15

Careful there, buddy. You might blow some minds if you're not careful.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 04:44 PM
5

"I love my daughter so much I don't even consider her as a person with free will and agency, just a thing to be protected from other males." -Herp Derp
/r/MensRights08/09/13 02:54 PM
15

Hey man you never ever hit a woman. Even if she just fucking stabbed someone and is trying to flee the scene.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:14 PM
8

I like how she stays so even tempered, even when discussing things that would miff me pretty bad. She just logics so hard.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 02:22 AM
3

I think it's wrong to deny women the right to vote, and I'm not even a gal! Wrong is wrong.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:07 AM
9

Good. I'd rather someone get actual help rather than be locked up. Now lets just the same treatment for men.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 02:26 AM
3

I lost interest when I saw "you, sir" toward the end. Apparently we're dealing with a 13 year old. I no longer care what this person things. Moving on...
/r/MensRights16/05/13 01:39 AM
2

I was OK with this story in the end. I think we all forget sometimes that stories like this are written by real people with different opinions and a different understanding of the world. This was her take, and in the end she leaned something, even if she didn't change her entire world view and switch to a die hard MRA. Articles like this are good. Its good to have these discussions with people whose opinions differ from ours as long as they are reasonable people and willing to have their assumpt…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:38 PM
7

I agree. Its just a shame that it works for one gender and not the other.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:17 PM
1

Not everyone has family. Some people don't have friends. Put effort into fixing the real problem, which is how society sees people accused of crime, and specifically sexually related crimes. This is a cultural problem, not a problem with the law.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:02 AM
2

And how would you do that? They could just say you chose to stay anonymous.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:57 AM
7

The media wouldn't go ape shit if we as a society didn't consider sexually related crime to be orders of magnitude worse than even murder. We tend to have issues where our naughty bits are concerned and lose all rationality.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:56 AM
3

The same reason you publish names of everyone accused for any crime. It makes it hard for the state to arrest and punish people for unspecified crimes. I've argued this before, but you should be glad that if the state wants to take you into its custody by force, the state is required to let everyone know who and under what charges. What we need to do is find a way, as a society, is to change how we treat those accused and acquitted of sexual related charges. That is the real problem here.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:51 AM
45

I doubt the author cares. "Doesn't matter, got pageviews." - Author (I'm guessing.)
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:19 PM
107

I'm starting to wonder if it's even worth mentioning anymore. All any online publisher cares about is eyeballs on their page (and their ads). They want us to be get all riled up so we go read (and see their ads) and comment and drive all our like minded ideologues (on both side of the argument) to read (and raid) the article (and see their ads). This is the game now. The formula doesn't change. I find it harder and harder to care about people publishing garbage like this.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:17 PM
12

I can't understand the mentality at play here. Do they really think that rape is just a result of someone being too horny? I swear, I have a hard time believing anyone is that stupid or obtuse. If that was the case, every 15 - 17 year old kid in the world would be a rapist. I remember my hormones at that age, they were off the charts. But I never had the desire to rape someone. That's just not how it works for sane people. That's why I resent being told that it is somehow my responsibility to st…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:37 PM
3

It wasn't hard to understand, but he wanted to know. Why you gotta be all defensive?
/r/MensRights17/03/13 09:59 PM
3

Uh, if I had to use a calculator, did I score the -30 "Can't add it up" bonus?
/r/MensRights16/03/13 02:15 AM
1

Maybe not, but I think that's much more likely than the ability to arrest and detain people without disclosing that information not being abused. Power without accountability is a dangerous proposition. More dangerous, I would argue, than the possibility of a besmirched reputation. Individuals and groups having a bias is terrible, but the state having the power to operate in secret against anyone for any reason would be catastrophic.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:45 AM
2

You really don't want that. You don't want a system where the public can't know who has had their rights removed, even temporarily. Otherwise you create a situation where it is possible to be arrested and disappeared. If I'm arrested, I want people to know. I want the state to be responsible to me and the public by not being able to operate in secret. What we all want is for the accused to not be demonized before a verdict is reached. That's the goal. Giving anonymity to the accused would be cau…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:37 AM
0

You really don't want that. That makes it possible for people to be arrested and disappeared. "Sorry, we can't discuss who we have arrested, where they are, or in what stage of the legal process they are in."
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:31 AM
2

Not a good idea. What we really want to avoid is the accused being demonized before a verdict is reached, which is great. But keeping the accused secret is a recipe for disaster. You do not want a system where anyone can be arrested, and the state doesn't have to tell anyone under the guise of "protecting the accused." The system already has abuse, and putting a giant cloak over it would make that a nightmare. I take comfort in the idea that if I'm arrested, they have to let people know. I don't…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:28 AM
20

I just wanted to congratulate you on using "is" three times in a row in a sentence and having it make sense.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:22 AM
7

Should have gone with <em>.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:28 AM
3

As for the bottom picture: stop assuming you know what I care about, generic internet person. I don't give two shits how you dress, male or female.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:23 AM
37

I give this a WhoCares?/10
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:13 PM
1

Not entirely on point, but I would like to say I've never understood this. One "lower class" job I have the utmost respect for are restaurant servers. I know, deep down, there is no way in the world I could do that job well. I work in software development, and some see that as a hoity toity job or a hard, complicated job. But I think serving would have to be the worst. I simply can't imagine myself keeping up with all the tables, the people, the orders, the refills, the checks. I'm telling you m…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:24 AM
1

Oh for fucks sake, this shit is driving me crazy. Who cares? They're kids! A two year old is not going to be able to grasp the finer points of your (probably stupid) gender studies theories. They like what they goddamn like and that's all there is to it. Fuck. Girls like princesses. Boys like cars and fire and shit. Some girls don't like princesses. Some boys don't like cars and fire and shit. It's a fucking kid. Be happy with who your kid is. Concerned that your kid is a pusher of princess cult…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:50 PM
4

Not so much of a question, really, as an observation that perplexes me to no end: Why in the world do y'all read this kind of junk? I mean, I read it because someone linked to it on reddit, but someone had to go out of their way to find this drivel in the first place. It's absolutely terrible writing, has dumb logic, and is so blatantly misandric it borders on absurd. I can't even get mad because it reads less like the opinion of an opposition group with offensive positions and more like the rav…
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:56 AM
8

Jesus, broski. No need to shit on everyone who still has a sense of humor. Go brood somewhere else.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 12:58 AM
4

Yeah, fuck you.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:51 AM
7

Naw bro, I meant when I read that part of her article. I cringed to think that there are dipshits sullying the MRM by threatening violence on bloggers.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 05:22 AM
6

That made me cringe when I read that.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 05:05 AM
4

So it looks like just about everything smart that could be said has been said already, but I'd just like to say that the MRA movement and Feminism surely can get along if we just stop listening to the crazies and stop being afraid of each other. People tend to congregate and look out for their own best interests. That's human nature. But that sort of tribalism is dangerous. It can bring people within the group together, but make them fear and distrust those outside their group. I'm not worried t…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 05:36 AM
9

Or you can read Beauty and the Beast as an example that people aren't to be dismissed just because they don't know how to interact well with others. Beast is the personification of a small child that as of yet has no concept of empathy or compassion for others. All children are pretty self obsessive, and they have to be taught the importance of thinking of others beside themselves. Beast learns that lesson, as I hope you want your children to learn. If we all gave up on people just because of fi…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 05:54 PM
6

If you go way back to Snow White days, sure. But I very much disagree with that when you get into the 80's/90's.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:52 AM
27

C'mon. Meeting the perfect guy wasn't the only thing the other princesses do. In fact, in most of the movies, its quite secondary. It's the amazing people these princesses prove to be that draws in the prince charming. The princes weren't the goal, but mostly a byproduct of the efforts put forth from the rest of the movie.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:52 AM
22

Dude... just... dude. C'mon.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 08:10 PM
1

I hate advertising in general. Especially the advertising that is gimmicky or tries to appeal to base emotions. That would include gender targeted ads. If I had my way, we'd have only informational ads. If not that, then I'd opt for gender neutral ads.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:34 PM
1

I read the article, and by the time I got down to the comments I was thinking, "OK. We'll probably have some uninformed gender slandering all around." What I didn't expect was for the "NO-bama, amirite??!?!?" comments that seem to dominate.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:13 PM
10

Not just women. I know plenty of guys who can't ever be wrong. Its a people thing, not a gender thing
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:03 PM
7

I don't think it makes us seem like bigots. I do, however, think that getting upset over what is clearly a joke makes us bitter old farts have no joy in life.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:59 PM
6

Can we please have a sense of humor?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:27 PM
0

That's not all we do here.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:27 PM
8

And yet, I find both funny.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:25 PM
4

I'm getting a prenup with my beloved. We both wanted a prenup. She (will shortly) make much more money than me, so she stands to lose more than I would monetarily, but in my mind it is about being fair. In the absolute worst case scenario in our lives, I still want everything to just be fair. If you're wondering, I approached prenup with her, which she was planning on asking about. Though the fact that we both have the goal of making our marriage fair and equal is a pretty good indicator that we…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:08 PM
2

I was being sincere, yes. :)
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:26 PM
1

Do I have to get out my sarcasm boots too? :)
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:27 AM
2

All that for two blow jobs a day. I don't have an MBA or anything, but I think that's a bad deal.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:13 AM
9

Most of the time, they don't really respect it. The truth is getting thick in here. Better get out my truth boots.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:05 AM
12

Her parenting skills are gonna be worth a crap. Prognosticator of the year, folks.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 06:55 PM
36

Except this is a cartoon. That's kind of the point of cartoons.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:54 AM
3

Agreed, but that doesn't negate my argument. She used her son's status as a weapon against OP. The kid needs to be protected, but if you can do that at the expense of others, people will exploit it. That's just the nature of assholes: exploit everything, not matter how well intended.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 01:08 AM
5

You were not using them as a weapon, but that mother was. She was lashing out at OP and using her child's protected status as her weapon.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:51 AM
6

I don't trust police, either.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:41 AM
7

The problem is when someone else uses the child's rights as a weapon against someone else. Children need special protections, sure, but if their rights trump others, then they'll become weapons.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:40 AM
1

Couldn't have said it better myself. I think the "do whatever you want" model is the best for kids.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 05:53 PM
1

I'm about as left as they come, but I accept science, whether I like the outcome or not. Show me enough research that says gender is totally a social construct, fine. Show me research that it's all in the genes, fine. I'd rather know the truth, though, either way.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 03:35 PM
1

Yet someone keeps down voting all the posts here that suggest that. I guess someone has their knickers in a twist over the idea that there may be more differences between men and women than just genetalia. Do differences have to be a bad thing?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:15 AM
3

Hey, man, what do I think about your comment?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:09 AM
1

If the legal system is operating in secret, who will hold them accountable if they don't allow you to make your phone call or have legal representation?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:30 AM
1

You really don't want the police to be able to arrest you and sentence you without telling anyone, do you?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:26 AM
4

To us it seems crazy, sure. They probably think the same thing in reverse.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 04:57 AM
5

This may be the /r/JusticePorn in me talking, but I really hope so.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:47 AM
2

"This isn't funny and I don't give a shit."
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:31 AM
2

Yeah, that happens when you have enough people visiting any forum. I also think it is a byproduct of having specialized subreddits that have laser like focus on specific issues or opinions. Gotta take the bad with the good, I suppose. :)
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:31 AM
8

The last line had me in stitches.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:27 AM
19

If I were a woman, I'd be insulted, honestly. If he had said "I have binders full of black people," or "binders full of asians," or "binders full of the disabled" I'd be insulted too. Having binders segregated out so you can pick and choose whatever demographic you want is pretty dumb. I'd rather he just have one binder labeled "qualified."
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:30 PM
3

It bothers me when sensationalist stuff like that is said because is detracts from any actual, if less glamorous, problems that exist. While pay inequality exists, I don't think it's 100% because of gender. It would help a lot if we could just know what our coworkers made without the sky falling down.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:17 AM
2

Dude. Chillax. Watch South Park. It's funny.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:06 AM
8

I rage-quit at "toilet seat."
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:25 AM
3

No, fool! The only logical name is Allied Atheist Alliance! That way it starts with three A's!
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:22 AM
9

Send them a letter. I just did. I am disturbed by this story, not because domestic abuse victims are getting a second hearing, but because NPR has focused only on women for this piece. Men, who are frequently victims of domestic abuse, and who are often unfairly treated by authorities when trying to report said abuse, are never discussed. It would be nice to hear NPR treat the problem of domestic abuse as a human issue, not related to gender.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 06:17 PM
3

Yeah, I noticed that too, but hey, the article was 99.99% right, so we can let it slide. :)
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:06 AM
-1

Except where he got weeks and years confused, and got the timing of the house purchase wrong, even though he had the quote right in front of him, presenting it as evidence. I couldn't read past that because I could no longer take what he said seriously if he wasn't even going to take the time to read what he is quoting.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:44 PM
4

I can't take this comment seriously. You got weeks and years confused and she clearly states the house was bought before the marriage, yet you characterize it as being bought during the marriage. I stopped reading there. You clearly were not paying much attention to what you were quoting.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:41 PM
13

If only there were an article about this very sort of security risk... just recently... maybe by someone as influential as a Wired reporter... then maybe something could be done about this... If only.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 05:43 AM
10

Stop hedging here. Assholes who bully and invoke violence should be hit back. Don't be so afraid that you have to put "I don't advocate hitting women, but..." We assume you don't advocate hitting women just because one asshole woman deserved to get hit. We assume that you don't advocate hitting men, either. We also assume you don't advocate hitting children, puppies, alligators, elephants, or fairies, regardless of size, strength, or existence. How about we just hit assholes who hit us first and…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:02 PM
10

Being male?
/r/MensRights23/06/12 01:13 PM
1

Seems to me there is an entire block of programming everyday on the major networks and a cable channel devoted to objectifying men. Soap operas depict middle aged women gallivanting around with nothing but fashion tycoons and young bad-boy types who all happen to be sexy and willing to jump into bed with said middle aged ladies. Granted, not as much skin, but those rich, sexy fashion barons are definitely objectified, not only for their good looks but for their wealth.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 11:50 AM
2

You shouldn't have stopped reading. It was truly amazing.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 04:00 AM
36

Yes, your Honor, that videotape is totally not me doing exactly what this man alleges I have done.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 03:42 AM
3

Dont worry. I got the joke, man.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:28 AM
1

If I remember right, when the ship tipped over in Italy recently, many people were angry that there were men in the lifeboats before some of the women. I think they're much more traditional with gender roles over in Italy, though.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:19 AM
3

I dunno. I don't think I'd want an uneducated woman. It says something about the woman. I want someone that is intellectually curious and driven; someone that I can talk to and to whom I don't have to explain my jokes. I loves me some educated women.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:54 AM
1

I think the original message was that women should (and should be able to) go out and earn more. Seems like some people have just misinterpreted that over the years. Like everything in this world, someone will find a way to take something whole and good and twist it to their favor.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:52 AM
1

Not so sure about that. Sure, the courts may be biased against males, but if you choose the right partner, you don't have to worry so much about that. And for what it's worth, I'd be more than happy to be a stay at home dad. Hell, it might even happen since my girlfriend will be earning more than me in a few years.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:49 AM
1

But that sounds like a happy, well adjusted couple. I think we're talking about the kinds of people, of both genders, that see relationships as a war to be won and lost. Dey be da crazy ones, yo.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:45 AM
1

Unfortunately, some people do see it that way.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:17 AM
3

They can. My girlfriend is going to make a lot more money than me in a few years. Of course, maybe it helps that I'm pretty driven in life just like she is.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:13 AM
6

That almost got out of control. I was hoping for a good squabble.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:10 AM
1

"Idiot" does. No need to be a dick.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:01 PM
1

No one was saying otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 10:25 PM
2

Those words also have specific clenical definitions for levels of retardation.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 10:24 PM
0

He used to have a show on television, FYI.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 10:22 PM
1

Thanks. I dun say smurt stuff much offen.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:50 PM
2

Thanks. :)
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:05 AM
2

Seems like that's good advice for either sex. To be honest, any good dating advice I've ever heard holds true for both sexes, including don't date moochers.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:31 PM
33

Some do. Not all. Some are awesome. Just like dudes. Some are dicks. Some are awesome. Let's just all try to be awesome, shall we?
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:29 PM
20

Yeah, I'm with ya. Too much. My girlfriend brings quite a bit to the table. She's well educated, fair minded, compassionate, and all around awesome. Everyone has the opportunity to be awesome, as long as they don't get too wrapped up in any number of societal norms, if you get my meaning.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:28 PM
1

So let me get this straight... Shit goes down, shit hits the newspapers as an insane violation of rights (as it should be), and now everyone is playing CYOA by pointing the finger at someone else?
/r/MensRights26/02/12 02:49 PM
7

I seriously considered volunteering there for a while, but I just never felt comfortable with it. I find it quite sad as well.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:08 AM
14

As a natural extension, this is exactly why I would never volunteer to be a Big Brother. Too much risk.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:40 PM
6

Wow. I like the words that are coming out of her mouth and stuff.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 11:58 PM
3

That's right, art peasant.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:57 AM
0

SO BRAVE.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:57 AM
4

SO BRAVE. But on a serious note, yeah. As a software engineer (I swear its a real thing) I always swore that I'd never go for women who were into me after I graduated just because of my degree. Then again, I also never saw many women cross the street to the engineering school looking for men with career opportunities. These guys may be cocky about future women who won't be as into them as they're hoping.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:31 AM
1

Those are all false summations. I could just as easily point out the pros of each movie in how they inspire courage in the face of adversity, self reliance, teamwork, friendship, etc.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter