TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

walkonthebeach Archive

View 130 posts and 705 comments by walkonthebeach on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1307

Progresswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:35 PM
854

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights03/08/14 11:04 PM
853

Social Issueswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:01 AM
835

Reverse Genderswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:57 PM
662

Reverse Genderswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights07/03/15 11:24 PM
562

Reverse Genderswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:19 PM
485

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:17 PM
287

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights28/03/15 01:23 AM
259

False Accusationswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:08 PM
221

Storywalkonthebeach/r/MensRights19/08/14 08:39 PM
216

Edu./Occu.walkonthebeach/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:10 PM
198

Social Issueswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:40 PM
157

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:49 PM
135

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:55 PM
129

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights25/07/15 02:03 AM
128

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights05/06/15 02:08 AM
113

Red Pill Theorywalkonthebeach/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 02:46 PM
111

False Accusationswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights08/09/14 06:13 PM
110

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:52 AM
107

Fathers/Custodywalkonthebeach/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:12 PM
106

Social Issueswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:07 PM
106

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:29 AM
105

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:18 PM
103

False Accusationwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights03/05/15 09:55 PM
101

Reverse Genderswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights15/03/15 10:51 PM
92

Social Issueswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights14/06/15 08:55 PM
89

Marriage/Divorcewalkonthebeach/r/MensRights07/06/15 06:01 PM
87

Generalwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights25/04/15 06:58 PM
87

False Accusationswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:56 PM
86

Ragebaitwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:10 PM
86

Generalwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:08 PM
84

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights28/06/15 05:53 PM
78

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights30/11/14 12:04 AM
74

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights22/04/15 07:11 PM
74

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:06 AM
63

Storywalkonthebeach/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:17 PM
61

Fathers/Custodywalkonthebeach/r/MensRights21/06/15 10:09 PM
61

Social Issueswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:43 AM
60

Raising Awarenesswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights09/08/14 08:51 PM
58

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights25/03/15 02:28 AM
56

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:31 PM
55

Red Pill Theorywalkonthebeach/r/TheRedPill23/11/14 02:00 PM
54

Anti-MRMwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights04/06/15 01:04 AM
54

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights15/06/15 01:29 AM
52

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:53 PM
51

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:12 PM
50

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights29/06/14 11:12 PM
48

Social Issueswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:06 PM
48

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:45 PM
46

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:08 AM
46

False Accusationwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights16/06/15 11:24 PM
44

Ragebaitwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:51 PM
41

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights31/05/15 01:29 AM
40

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:17 AM
38

Reverse Genderswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:08 PM
38

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:54 AM
37

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights17/06/14 01:02 AM
36

Outragewalkonthebeach/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:28 AM
35

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:55 PM
35

Edu./Occu.walkonthebeach/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:30 AM
34

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:21 PM
34

Discriminationwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights03/07/14 09:28 PM
32

Sciencewalkonthebeach/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 06:41 PM
30

Opinionwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:53 PM
29

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights11/04/15 07:11 PM
29

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:42 AM
29

Discriminationwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:20 PM
28

Discriminationwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:17 PM
26

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights29/06/14 10:54 PM
26

False Accusationwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:36 PM
25

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:53 PM
23

Storywalkonthebeach/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:18 AM
23

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights23/03/15 05:55 PM
23

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:07 PM
23

WBBwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:25 PM
23

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:29 AM
22

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:12 PM
21

Social Issueswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights13/06/15 02:22 AM
21

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights31/12/14 12:35 AM
21

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:37 AM
20

Discriminationwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:42 AM
20

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights24/07/15 01:54 AM
19

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:49 AM
19

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:13 PM
18

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:05 PM
15

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:48 PM
15

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:23 AM
15

Opinionwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights08/02/15 01:46 AM
15

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:54 PM
14

Reverse Genderswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights13/01/15 01:30 PM
13

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights20/11/14 10:56 PM
12

Social Issueswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:07 PM
11

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:21 AM
11

Reverse Genderswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights16/01/15 12:05 AM
10

Storywalkonthebeach/r/MensRights14/06/14 07:27 PM
10

Social Issueswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights18/06/15 05:11 PM
9

Fathers/Custodywalkonthebeach/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:51 PM
9

Feminismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights20/07/15 12:32 PM
9

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights02/04/15 12:58 AM
8

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights21/07/15 01:59 AM
8

Legal Rightswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:30 PM
7

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights11/04/15 07:20 PM
7

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:56 PM
7

Feminismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:47 PM
6

Fathers/Custodywalkonthebeach/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:47 PM
6

Outragewalkonthebeach/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:39 AM
6

Generalwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:55 PM
6

Edu./Occu.walkonthebeach/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:29 AM
5

Reverse Genderswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights14/01/15 01:43 AM
5

Fathers/Custodywalkonthebeach/r/MensRights17/06/15 05:19 PM
3

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights03/07/14 10:02 AM
3

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights03/02/15 06:21 PM
3

Reverse Genderswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:06 PM
3

Reverse Genderswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights29/06/14 08:40 PM
2

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:02 AM
2

Outragewalkonthebeach/r/MensRights24/09/14 10:33 PM
2

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:02 AM
2

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights13/01/15 01:22 AM
2

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:54 PM
2

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights11/12/14 02:53 AM
1

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:56 AM
1

Intactivismwalkonthebeach/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:48 PM
1

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:07 AM
1

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights06/01/15 05:20 PM
0

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:54 PM
0

walkonthebeach/r/PussyPass13/01/15 12:43 AM
0

Newswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:33 PM
0

Social Issueswalkonthebeach/r/MensRights14/06/15 08:30 PM
0

walkonthebeach/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/15 04:08 PM
0

walkonthebeach/r/MensRights20/07/14 05:24 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There are so many funny bits in this article: "What bigger power differential could there be than between the president of the United States and this poor innocent girl? Not only an intern but clearly a girl who had a kind of pleading, open look to her–somebody who was looking for a father figure." "My publicly stated opinion at the time was that I don’t care what public figures do in their private life. It’s a very sophisticated style among the French, and generally in Europe, where the heads o…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 10:30 PM
2

I would just call their head-office in NY. I think your best bet would be to speak to their PR dept. and say you are writing a book about social media dating; and/or you have a blog. Hard to blag that you are a journalist if you're not, as they can look you up. Then email they the story and ask for their comments etc. Put leading open-ended questions to them like: "What advantages does S&S see in employing someone who is gender shaming people on social media?". "It what negative ways will S&Ss c…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:52 PM
5

Try mentioning gendered violence against men, i.e.: male genital mutilation, AKA circumcision. They have a whole team of censors just watching for those words!
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:49 PM
10

Here is a link to the huge protest that has caused her to backtrack: https://archive.is/lCTsD Of course the correction article is a joke: It's published in the Guardian [which doesn't have a "women's section", because the whole paper is for women only], the title is all about violence against women, and she is not even going to change the title of the VaWG report. And the article ends with: "I hope my willingness to address these concerns will be welcomed, but until it is no longer the case that…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:18 PM
1

Also here: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22730313-500-semen-has-controlling-power-over-female-genes-and-behaviour/
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:31 AM
1

Always makes me chuckle to see that the only thing that the Muslims and Jews can agree on is sexually abusing their male children by mutilating their genitals. You're best mates really eh? Added bonus for being a Muslim: You can mutilate your little girls' genitals as well — as long as you just "trim" them LOL. Sort of sums both of you lot up. BTW, when all the smart, intelligent, western Europeans + North Americans + Australians have disappeared due to not producing enough kids, the world will …
/r/MensRights26/07/15 07:39 PM
11

This was a very interesting and significant judgement. For starters, the case was all about FGM; yet the judge seemed to really want to make a point about MGM and went out of his way to do so. He had clearly read-up on the subject, and references Brian D. Earp. Note that we should all offer our enduring thanks to Brian. His scholarly works, and the fact he is associated with Oxford University, add huge weight to the intact arguments. His is the type of research and opinion that UK judges feel ha…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 04:43 PM
6

Yes. And he was wilfully misrepresenting her argument. Which is silly, because he has very, very good arguments on his side. And he was not talking about the specifics of the new law. It's all a shame. It's quite easy in London to go on a training course for a few days to teach you how to come across best when being interviewed in the media.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 04:07 PM
5

You are correct, that is what she was saying. But the chap from Father's 4 Justice was not very good in getting his point across.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:55 PM
11

In the UK, court orders are made to allow fathers to have contact rights with their children. The problem is, often, these orders are just ignored by the mothers and the courts, and it can take a father years to see his kids.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:34 PM
1

Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:28 PM
2

Impossible to read as it's behind a paywall. If anyone has access, please post a link at www.archive.is Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:13 PM
3

Had our 6 year old girl married to a peodophile death-cult leader this week. He'll fuck her when she's 9. Thank goodness for a wall of separation between an effectively religious group such as this sub and the state's laws. Otherwise you're no different than the two Christian groups Thomas Jefferson referenced in his now famous example put forth.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:33 AM
1

Looks like they are now deleting the comments that mention MGM. It's just so hypocritical and disgusting that they talk about MGM, and then don't allow any criticism of their stance on the matter.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:56 PM
18

I like this bit at the end of the article: "If you're a victim of rape, help is just a phone call away. The Day League 24-hour rape crisis hotline number is 404-377-1428." Should be: "If you're a victim of a false rape accusation, help is just a phone call away. The Day League 24-hour false rape accusation crisis hotline number is 404-377-1428."
/r/MensRights25/07/15 03:42 PM
8

Exactly. And Fetherstone almost definitely attends child sex-abuse parties where little boys are held down and have their penises skinned.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 01:50 PM
26

Interestingly, the Guardian censors seemed to have forgotten that comments about MGM/Male Circumcision are totally forbidden by them in articles about FGM; or maybe they are just slipping. A few comments have brought up the hypocrisy, and there is a great rebuttal here: https://archive.is/2g4h6
/r/MensRights25/07/15 02:13 AM
1

1: Goal mouth 6m: representing a man who does not use condoms. 2: Goal mouth 2m: representing a circumcised man who does not use condoms. 3: Goal mouth 2m + teammates: representing a circumcised man who uses condoms consistently. 4: Goal mouth 2m + teammates: representing an intact man who uses condoms consistently. See how they omitted option 4 completely? That's because the goal results would be exactly the same as option 3 — but there would be no need for the circumcision. And no circumcision…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:54 PM
5

Thanks. That's exactly where I got it from (I'm only a simple man, I can't think these things up on my own :-) ). I couldn't be bothered to find and post it; But I remembered Richard Dawkins on the same subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKPWW5uu200
/r/MensRights24/07/15 09:11 PM
13

What's interesting here is that feminism has developed a language, philosophy and thought process very similar to religions and cults (not that they can't be the same thing). The elements of this language are so complex, convoluted and obscure, that any clever person can bend and twist it to fit any position they want. And if they are really smart, you actually start to believe it yourself until you wakeup and realise it's all bullshit. In feminism's case, a lot of this stems from them looking a…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 05:26 PM
6

And note how the stats show how the men are less likely to want FGM for their daughters — despite what we are told by feminist anti-FGM activist that is all a result of the "patriarchy" and "gender imbalances": "But when researchers asked if FGM was necessary, more women than men said it was (63 percent compared to 57 percent). It was men, in fact, who more often expressed uncertainty about FGM’s necessity (23 percent versus 13 percent)."
/r/MensRights24/07/15 01:56 AM
28

Interestingly, if you read the article, it is a female police officer (Constable Leesa Alexander) who does not believe the female "victim"; and it's a (ex) male police officer who believes her blindly.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 04:05 PM
2

Author has zero understanding of what an "active user" means.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 01:52 PM
3

True. But it an angry and growing movement, and there are many ways to fight the evils of MGM. Of course it's ironic that MGM singles-out Jewish boys especially for genital mutilation! Dr Mengele is laughing in his grave.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 12:57 AM
1

Yes — it's bizarre! I mean they will need to increase the success of boys in school, and rates of men in higher education to have "Equal representation in education" They are also demanding: "Equal parenting rights". What the fuck is that supposed to mean?? That men will get equal access rights to their kids after divorce/separation?? Bring it on!
/r/MensRights22/07/15 05:23 PM
0

she is still being internally consistent in her thoughts "internally" being the operative word. That's the definition of "hamstering".
/r/MensRights21/07/15 02:31 PM
1

Good post. All this comes down to the error of adopting some sort of overarching "cult" through which to view the world. This can be: feminism, communism, islam, christianity, karma, socialism, evolution-ism, Freud-ism etc. So it every situation in life, someone like Jessica Valenti holds up the "lens" of feminism through which to view the world. Thus the panorama that is projected onto her retina/mind contains only the fun-fair of feminist thought, action and perception. Everything else is filt…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 02:26 PM
0

schadenfreude-gasm I want to have one of those at least 3 times a day!!
/r/MensRights21/07/15 02:20 PM
20

There should be some sort of template that parents can download to send to their school, to specifically require that their sons or daughters are not subject to any form of feminist indoctrination, either by the school or by outside agencies. eg: "My children are not to be subject to any teachings that imply or state that men are the root cause of problems in the world, and that male thought processes or actions are somehow delinquent and need correction".
/r/MensRights20/07/15 12:48 PM
3

All you need to do is replace the word "men" with "jews" to realise the full horror of this sort of discrimination. In no other area is one allowed to group people together on the basis of their gender, religion, sexual orientation, race etc. and then slander and belittle them. But grouping "men" together is always fair game. What's amazing is the vast number of NGOs that are pushing this discrimination, and this group promotes itself as some sort of umbrella organisation for their attacks on me…
/r/MensRights20/07/15 12:40 PM
5

Feminism is for feminists. Equality is for everyone.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 04:44 AM
2

Here's a link to the full article in The Times. Courtesy of a poster at Voat!: https://archive.is/hx6p9
/r/MensRights19/07/15 02:57 PM
20

Business Insider deleted the article - most likely because the movie studio (one of their advertisers) was pissed off. But it was in the Google Cache; and is now here for posterity... https://archive.is/89H9J
/r/MensRights19/07/15 02:32 PM
3

Agreed. I mean the level of hate that was directed at him was just stunning, and a real insight into the mindset of the toxic feminists and the white-knights lick their feet. Here is a man who has spent his life devoted to science and finding a cure for cancer and gawd knows what else. Was he in it for the money? Nope. Did you take the shilling of the big pharma companies and sell-out? Nope. Did he patent some drug and then run off to Tahiti with a 25 year old Polish lap dancer? Nope. How many w…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 11:34 PM
6

Does anyone have a subscription to The Times online so they can post the whole article and maybe the recording to YouTube?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:08 PM
1

Does anyone have a subscription to The Times online so they can post the whole article? And post the recording to YouTube?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:05 PM
7

Yes. You are correct. I was wrong. Apologies. God, what I would give for just one of these guys to go the police and accuse her of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 10:46 PM
11

dont tell me what is right and wrong for my body. Exactly. Once you are 18, you can decide to if you want to have your penis mutilated or not. But nobody has the right to make that decision for you before you can make the decision for yourself — not even your parents. My body, my choice.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 10:11 PM
3

It's totally acceptable. Adults consenting to being silly. Here's the same with the genders swapped: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x84QyUOP2Ho Edit: I'm wrong. The guys are tricked.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 10:05 PM
10

I still haven't seen any evidence, however, that the surgeries are not harmful Here you go! Female Circumcision Does Not Always Reduce Sexual Experiences "International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown: Female genital cutting in this group of women did not attenuate sexual feelings: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01550.x/abstract "The Journal of Sexual Medicine" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:33 PM
3

I think we agree on the most important points. But… Let's imagine you are a judge in an FGM trial in the UK, and the defendants — a husband and wife — have been found guilty of amputating their infant daughter's external glans clitoris and clitoral hood. They did this with a rusty razor blade. The girl got an infection but has now recovered. Text message and voice mail recordings have proved that they both knew that what they were doing was a serious criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:31 PM
4

The damage is not a "side effect" your moron: http://notyourstocut.com/2015/03/24/circumcision-ruins-the-glans/ And it's not "surgery" — it's genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:06 PM
7

Jews don't do it out of malice. Wrong again... Mohel tells the truth Watch this evil Mohel showing and boasting about the “instruments” he uses to torture and mutilate little Jewish boys. Or as he calls it: ”tickling” them. Evil child abusing Mohel Here he states quite clearly that the purpose of him mutilating little boys’ genitals is to damage their sexuality: Mutilate infants to damage their sexuality
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:03 PM
17

Where the two differ, however, is that FGM is performed for the purpose limiting female pleasure, and repressing her sexuality. It's motivation comes from malice. I always find this statement bizarre when I see it… I mean who gives a fuck what the fucking reason is? Does it make any fucking difference? None whatsoever. Do you think that infants or little children lie there as their genitals are being mutilated and think "oh, this is not so bad, my parents are doing this because they love me and …
/r/MensRights17/07/15 07:23 PM
1

Agreed. The guy sounds and writes like a feminist!
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:24 PM
3

The video states that many of the "ideas" that make up what it means to be a "man" or a "women" are common thoughout the world. er…. maybe that's because they are hardwired into us and not "social constructs".
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:20 PM
7

No. Not if you put it on such an daft viewing platform. Just post a link to the same video on YouTube
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:32 PM
1

Agreed. If you force yourself to listen to what he is actually saying, then he is very good. I suspect he feels he has to keep-up with the rough accent and bad-boy image, as that has become his brand.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:48 PM
11

I think that given the situation, you are going to find it very, very hard indeed to break through to them — even more so given your sister-in-law's father being a doctor. And if you are not careful, you can end-up damaging your relationship with your extended family. You are only morally obliged to do your best, and so I would forward them this great video presentation from a doctor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceht-3xu84I After that, I would just be friendly, and don't mention it again. Th…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 12:10 PM
7

"The report notes that girls’ involvement in juvenile justice systems nationally is “growing disproportionately,” How the fuck can that be when 95% of the prison population is male?They have a long way to catch up!
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:50 PM
12

Feminism is for feminists. Equality is for everyone.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:48 PM
1

And I learnt a new word: "Henpeckicism"!
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:01 PM
4

You can read the full paper here: https://www.academia.edu/10270196/Female_genital_mutilation_and_male_circumcision_Toward_an_autonomy-based_ethical_framework
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:37 AM
1

Not that that's the part of the research that the article chose to highlight of course! It's always fun to read an article or "research" so uncritical of male genital mutilation when it's written by a female.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:23 AM
1

Yeah, I often like to argue over semantics Maybe we share the same therapist! LOL The good thing about debating on Reddit, is that it really hones my arguments for when I enter the "real" word. Typing it all out really helps it sink in to the deepest part of my brain. "Respect" as the man said...
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:32 PM
1

Thanks for the reply. FGM is regularly referred to as "sexual abuse" by the courts, governments, police etc. A quick Google will show that. The sexual organs are being mutilated, therefore it's sexual abuse. Same goes for MGM in my book. But I do appreciate where you are coming from. Thanks again.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:01 PM
2

Hit's 'em right where it hurts!
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:31 PM
2

But it's neither rape nor sexual assault Yes, it's worse. As I said above: If you asked a group of intact men (from a non MGM culture) the following question, what do you think the answer would be? Q: You have two options:(A) a man is going to rape you with his penis inside your anus for 2 minutes or (B) your foreskin will be cut off with a knife and without anaesthetic. I would vouch that every man would chose option (A). So MGM is worse than rape=sexual abuse. Which one would you chose /u/ruff…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:31 PM
7

Amazing that this article is in the dreaded Guardian (spits). Men are turing in to girls basically; and they're doing it because they are following the "media" and feminism — instead of knowing what women really want.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:53 AM
1

OK. Your point is well taken. Thank you. Much appreciated. FGM has, indeed, been described as 'sexual abuse.' That term, however, usually connotes an act done for sexual gratification... Sexual abuse is almost always about power, control and dominance — it's not about sexual gratification. Almost all rapists and sex abusers have access to willing sex parters. A simple Google search will confirm this understanding amongst all professionals in the field; and indeed perpetrators themselves. So male…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:38 PM
0

Do you know that she's ever even attended a bris? It's not a "bris"; it's a infant boy genital mutilation sex abuse party. You are trying to use words to disguise anti-semitism and child sex abuse. Stop it. I'm condemning child sex abusers. Their religion, culture or race is irrelevant. Naomi Dickson is signing as the executive director of Jewish Women's Aid. So Jewish Women's Aid is declaring, falsely, that only females are subject to genital mutilation. Thus Jewish Women's Aid, and Naomi Dicks…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:51 PM
3

Child sex abusers are cunts. Stop trying to defend the genital mutilation of innocent Jewish infant boys. Jewish children deserve the same protection from abuse as everyone else. Fuck off to /r/gasthekikes with your filfty anti-semitism.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:18 PM
28

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others...
/r/MensRights08/07/15 11:50 AM
10

And one of the signatories is: Naomi Dickson Jewish Women’s Aid Almost every Jewish infant boy suffers serious pre-meditated grievous bodily harm — genital mutilation. And not only that, it's done at a special child sex-abuse party, where the parents, family & friends all stand around making penis jokes whilst they booze on wine and stuff their faces with sandwiches. And in the background, the terrified little boy screams in agony as a large part of his penis is sliced-off without even an anaest…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:32 PM
23

Women are "forced" by Patriarchal Capitalist Social Conditioning™ or PCSC™ to buy expensive handbags at $500 a pop. So this cost should be tax-deductible.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:10 PM
8

Can I borrow that insult and use it myself? Is it copyrighted? Do I pay-per-use? 😆
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:54 PM
1

Equality is legally applied to individuals, not groups. So you can't group men and women together for this purpose. Her views would not stand up in court.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:42 AM
0

Maybe they should get paid more when they have some people of color in their team. Equality and all...
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:26 AM
3

Agreed. He also has a long criminal history - and the judge took that into account. If you have a clean sheet, you are a first offender, and the court will give you a lighter penalty.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 11:30 PM
3

What are they asking for? That every team be paid the same? The disabled? The young? The old? The transgender?: All to be paid the same, even if they bring in zero revenue?
/r/MensRights06/07/15 05:18 PM
5

I have always found her a deeply damaged person, full of hate and bile. And she keeps at it for year after year — with no attempt to stride forwards and awaken herself. I have compassion for her. Not sympathy, compassion.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:02 PM
60

"That young men succeed in suicide more often than girls isn't really the point. Indeed, the more callous among us would say that it was quite nice for young men finally to find something that they're better at than girls."
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:51 AM
1

I think that is a really fascinating and insightful analysis of the situation — especially the last half of what you have written. You should really consider seeing if you can't some of the more respected newspapers or magazine etc. to accept an article of yours on the subject. Amazing. Thank you. Very hard to get such a truthful view from the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:10 PM
5

Agreed. It wasn't even a "joke", just some silly opening remarks to kick-off an informal chat before lunch. It just baffles me as to why he's just been judged on this — and not what was actually DOING, which was working hard to push women in science! Something he has been dedicated to for years. Would the opposite be acceptable? For instance: if I said I loved black people; but in practice as was beating them up, would everyone just ignore what I DID and just accept what I SAID?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:57 PM
3

And it seems that rape scenes are a no-no, especially if they are "gratuitous". I mean when the heck does any scene become "gratuitous". But death and torture of men is just fine anytime!
/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:44 PM
79

Wow! A man actually standing up to defend other men — and a high profile one at that. Perhaps these guys are starting to grasp what they are up against. Well done Mr Dimbleby.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:11 PM
13

Here's the truth about male "circumcision" in so many parts of the world: NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://youtu.be/WPthgNqG1YY?t=2m20s NSFL: Warning! Horrific photo collection from a Dutch doctor of hundreds of mutilated, amputated and seriously infected penises (many with gangrene) of African boys and men as a result of "male circumcision" - ie: sexual abuse and genital mutilation. This is just one, tin…
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:30 AM
1

"Mankiller" Ha ha ha…!
/r/MensRights29/06/15 11:26 PM
-6

Thanks for your sane comment. Indeed you can read the UK law here, and although it is rather complex, it has many safeguards and limitations, and is all pretty reasonable as you say. http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/rape_and_sexual_offences/consent/ My advice to men is simple: stay away from any sexual situation that could be tricky if it involves: drugs, drink, people with a low mental capacity, group sex, quick sex with someone you just met, sex with someone who clearly has emotional issues …
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:43 PM
3

MGM isn't that common in the UK since the NHS won't pay for it. It's not common because most folks in the UK don't want to sexually abuse their children. Rape also "isn't that common". Does that help? I suspect its less about censorship and more about making sure the motion passes. A definition of censorship: censoring or suppressing ideas or speech to manipulate the outcome of voting.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:05 PM
1

Circumcision is not intended to damage the genitals. You child sex-abuser. What the fuck do you think it does? http://notyourstocut.com/2015/03/24/circumcision-ruins-the-glans/
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:08 PM
1

I don't wana talk to you no more…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:04 PM
1

rather than resorting to petty name-calling. I think I'll stick with the petty name-calling thank you. You are a snotty nosed tosser. Shove off and die. How was that?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:49 PM
0

The point is The point is, you're a twit.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:34 PM
1

their voices are drowned out by the radical, extreme members of the movement who are barely feminists in the first place. That's why so few women consider themselves feminists- because they don't want to be associated with the extreme radical 'feminists' You are such a wanker — you even admit the truth about feminism yourself for all to see. I mean what's the point of asking us questions here, when you give the right reason yourself. Up yer bum
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:21 PM
4

Last time I checked, I'm not a fucking sheep you dolt. You may follow the heard, but I make my own mind up. Support is slowly rising for mens rights. Feminism has been around for over 100 years, at first it was good — women were oppressed, and needed to made equal; those women would have had my support. But modern feminism is just a bunch of nasty, whiny, aggressive louts. Women are not stupid, they want equality, but they don't want feminism. That is known as the "feminist paradox": http://www.…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:55 PM
6

Do you support gender equality? If you do, you're a feminist. er… is that why it's called "feminism" and not "egalitarianism"? Do you support no smoking and autobahns? If you do, you're a Nazi! If I gave you a $5 bill and told you it was a $50 bill, and then asked you to give me 5 x $10 bills in change; would you? Whether other women support it or not is irrelevant. er… you want me to support something called "feminism", when most "females" don't support it. Fuck Off you Twat.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 08:28 PM
7

Why on earth should I, a man, consider myself a "feminist", when the vast majority of women shun that word, and will not consider themselves such?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:11 PM
-1

I wonder why they don't also tell us how many Jews are in FB? Jews do so well in all areas of life — and they are mainly ashkenazi. Why would a people making up such a small percentage (~0.25%) of the global population earn 25%, or more, of the world’s top prizes in economics, physics, mathematics and medicine? You can waffle all you want, but the truth is that they have much higher IQs, and most of that is due to genetic inheritance. Same goes for "asians". They have a higher IQ then white west…
/r/MensRights27/06/15 10:43 PM
4

Snake eating its own tail… again.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:53 AM
5

Exactly. And we need to extended circumcision to women, as it has been shown to be just as effective for them. And far more women suffer HIV/AIDs then men. Female Circumcision can reduce the chances of contracting HIV by 50-60%. And don't worry — more and more, female "circumcision" in Africa is being done by "professionals" in "hygienic" conditions: http://www.cruxnow.com/life/2015/01/10/african-church-leaders-worry-about-the-medicalization-of-female-genital-mutilation/ Female Circumcision & He…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 11:56 PM
4

I like this bit — they were "surprised" that their discriminatory presumptions did not come true: A significant gender difference also emerged: counterintuitively, girls' best friendships had a slight tendency to promote risky and ineffective ways of coping with adversity (such as self-blame and substance use), but boys' best friendships did not.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:27 PM
5

There is no health benefit to female genital mutilation... Female circumcision also has great benefits — time to start slicing those little labia lips off LOL!! Female Circumcision can reduce the chances of contracting HIV by 50-60%. And don't worry — more and more, female "circumcision" in Africa is being done by "professionals" in "hygienic" conditions: http://www.cruxnow.com/life/2015/01/10/african-church-leaders-worry-about-the-medicalization-of-female-genital-mutilation/ Female Circumcision…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:14 PM
3

Nothing like FGM! ;-) NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://youtu.be/WPthgNqG1YY?t=2m20s NSFL: Warning! Horrific photo collection from a Dutch doctor of hundreds of mutilated, amputated and seriously infected penises (many with gangrene) of African boys and men as a result of "male circumcision" - ie: sexual abuse and genital mutilation. This is just one, tiny area of Africa - where MGM is widespread. Most of …
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:11 PM
2

As a circumcised male myself, I see nothing inherently wrong with the practice Sure. Thanks Mom! LOL! 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html http://www.livescience.com/1624-study-cir…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:09 PM
1

Good point. Why would the first sentence be there, unless the second sentence applied only to women?? You've convinced me already. Please send me your bill.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:55 PM
2

This is a very interesting article. Well worth a careful read.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:53 PM
2

I like these weasel words in the FAQ #14: http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/faq.htm#q15 14. How has the ERA been related to women in the military? "...the lack of an ERA in the Constitution does not protect women against involuntary military service." So women want protection from having to defend their country?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:19 PM
1

I can see where you are coming from, and there is something smelly about it for sure. But the sentence: "Women shall have equal rights in the United States and every place subject to its jurisdiction." is totally covered by the second sentence: "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." So the first sentence is redundant and just unnecessary. The US constitution is a very, very, tightly worded document, and an amazin…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:15 PM
5

Fascinating… "The provisions of this article shall not be construed to impair any rights, benefits, or exemptions now or hereafter conferred by law upon persons of the female sex." Then what is the point of the original amendment then!! You might just as well have: "Men and women are equal, unless women decide otherwise". It's straight out of animal farm: "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others".
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:38 AM
12

Sometimes the sexism is so clear and transparent it makes me slack-jawed.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 06:26 PM
1

Exactly! They are so gormless, they have no idea.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:08 AM
7

I agree. His story is great. But the timing of the Guardian shows it's hatred of men and their attempt to belittle them whenever they can.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:08 AM
11

Had to see it to believe it. The Guardian is becoming a caricature of itself.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 10:10 PM
3

Well, at least this made it pretty high up on /r/nottheonion. Which tells you everything you need to know.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 11:54 PM
1

This guy is creepy.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 03:46 PM
7

Oh dear oh dear… the CDC just parrots the AAP report: The American Academy of Pediatrics is a trade organisation, and exists for the promotion of its members - paediatric doctors. It is not, and never will be, a patient advocacy group. The AAP members make millions of dollars from circumcision infant baby boys, and millions more from selling the amputated foreskins for medical research and cosmetics: http://www.foreskin.org/f4sale.htm “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when h…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 08:21 PM
9

Male circumcision or mutilation or whatever you want to call it is not equivalent to female circumcision Nothing like FGM! ;-) NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://youtu.be/WPthgNqG1YY?t=2m20s NSFL: Warning! Horrific photo collection from a Dutch doctor of hundreds of mutilated, amputated and seriously infected penises (many with gangrene) of African boys and men as a result of "male circumcision" - ie: sexua…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 08:17 PM
13

I'm sorry you hate women so much that you try to equate this to female circumcision. Its not even close…. Maybe if you see an actual female circumcision Oh dear… Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Which child will lose "sexual function"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoin…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 08:16 PM
7

There is barely a difference between an erect circumcised and uncircumcised penis visually. Do you have evidence in regards to the keratinized mucosa? Oh dear... http://notyourstocut.com/2015/03/24/circumcision-ruins-the-glans/
/r/MensRights19/06/15 08:12 PM
10

Please do correct me if my logic is off. I'm genuinely perplexed by this male rights issue. The foreskin evolved over 100 million years of human evolution. The idea that you are putting forwards, that there are no issues with the human sexual experience by hacking-off part of the penis is just silly. Let's hear the opinion of a Senior Lecturer in Pathology: According to a number of leading researchers and scientists - including Ken McGrath, Senior Lecturer in Pathology at the Faculty of Health, …
/r/MensRights19/06/15 08:11 PM
3

Sorry. I didn't read your post carefully. Deleted.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:56 PM
1

This video is everything that piece-of-shit "Angel Soft" TV commercial is not. This is the shit Angel Soft video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH5xreMlQbM&index=32&list=WL
/r/MensRights17/06/15 05:23 PM
3

I think that's very, interesting point. The popularity of 50 Shades of Grey says it all: http://www.irishtimes.com/news/why-is-a-tale-of-sexual-submission-so-dominant-in-women-s-thoughts-1.493430
/r/MensRights17/06/15 05:06 PM
3

Very good point indeed.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:33 AM
3

Saw that, thanks. I guess it not really "neutral", as it's written by a guy from a circumcising culture, so there is a huge inbuilt bias. And in a way, although it has the "positives" and the "negatives", it ends by going with the terrible middle ground of "it's up to the parents" etc.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:33 AM
1

Good point. But it is interesting that women are more than happy to entertain the idea, because they know what women are like….
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:06 AM
3

Something missing?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 01:42 AM
2

GREAT review, and totally on point. Vicky Pryce is a nutter, who stabbed her hubby in the back when he ran off with a young bint.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 11:34 PM
5

She just needs to "man-up" I reckon. /s
/r/MensRights16/06/15 11:26 PM
11

Yep. You ain't going to be bored with that dad, and you are going to learn to have fun in life! If you showed a young boy these pictures, and asked him which person he would like to hang-out with; my bet would be the dad! Not so sure a little girl wouldn't want the same thing as well. But then they would want to return to the safe, warm and snug home at the end of the day — and their mum. That's why kids need a mum and dad; or two parents that can handle the load and offer different aspects masc…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 10:58 PM
2

Well, they're going to find out what the "patriarchy" is for sure...
/r/MensRights16/06/15 07:15 PM
3

Cenk raising his eyes to the heavens at this point. LOL: https://youtu.be/j5a4wtscImc?t=5m53s
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:26 PM
4

What on earth is she doing in the UK promoting all this? In the UK education sector, women outperform men at all levels, all the way unto and including University? Why not got to Saudi Arabia, where women really need her help??
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:49 PM
1

There will be some very interesting legal angles I think. This is mainly because the University and Student Union will be dripping in anti-sexist and gender neural rules and regulations — all put there by feminists! So it's fun when you use them to help men.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:27 PM
3

The whole thing is just PR buzz for all involved. There is nothing to stop these companies signing-up men anytime, but just releasing the books at the right time after the year is up. Either that, or they will just be clever and say that the release has been planned for months.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:49 PM
110

5 of the top 12 fiction authors are women! And there is a very even spread of men and women all across the list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_fiction_authors
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:21 PM
27

Small point, but I met a guy the other day in the gym, who works for the UN. He says it is riddled with women's groups, NGO and other organisations. Everyone is sick of it, and it's becoming crazy.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:13 PM
1

Now I'm just confused. Translate in to English please :-)
/r/MensRights15/06/15 09:33 PM
2

Calm down dear, calm down.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 09:01 PM
2

Fascinating. Thank you so much for that.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 09:00 PM
1

Accepted. How to I un-swap my gender swap? :-))
/r/MensRights15/06/15 08:56 PM
2

This research seems to be constructed to inflate the statistics of rape and sexual assault. Take a look at one of the questions that gave this result below: "...among the control group that received brochures, about ten percent of the women reported they had been raped (defined as an assault during which a perpetrator used force, threats, or incapacitation through drugs or alcohol)" So according to them 1 in 10 women was raped. But this is one of the questions they were asked. If they replied "y…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 10:30 PM
7

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Abdulaziz_University They also have a branch of the UCL in Qatar where thousands of men are dying building stadiums for the world cup. So much for their claim of "Gender Equality". http://www.ucl.ac.uk/qatar
/r/MensRights14/06/15 08:57 PM
1

Caused by this... NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://youtu.be/WPthgNqG1YY?t=2m20s NSFL: Warning! Horrific photo collection from a Dutch doctor of hundreds of mutilated, amputated and seriously infected penises (many with gangrene) of African boys and men as a result of "male circumcision" - ie: sexual abuse and genital mutilation. This is just one, tiny area of Africa - where MGM is widespread. Most of thes…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 09:43 PM
2

Goddammit man, you are correct: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/434869/Queens_birthday_honours_list_2015.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_Bachelor I guess the argument would be that there should be a female equivalent to the Knight Bachelor. Knight Bachelorette perhaps? :-)
/r/MensRights13/06/15 08:15 PM
1

Wish they would have discussed how she yanked the video down to take the date off Precisely what I thought. That is a smoking gun for sure.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 07:06 PM
11

No mention of the word "kidnap" anywhere I see...
/r/MensRights13/06/15 04:41 PM
1

I looked that up to check it out. But the honours system is so complicated, I just can't figure it out! Can you point me in the right direction?
/r/MensRights13/06/15 03:14 PM
1

Haredi = Jewish Taliban Jesuits & Opus Dei = Catholic Taliban
/r/MensRights13/06/15 01:08 AM
2

Yes I saw this. What is so bizarre, is that the Guardian just does not seem to grasp their own total hypocrisy. And in the very week where that Nobel Prize winning man gets toasted for talking about women in labs!!! Personally, I think that adoration of the human body is wonderful, and the ancient Greeks would have totally understood that.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:39 PM
2

Take a look at one of the questions that gave this result below: "...among the control group that received brochures, about ten percent of the women reported they had been raped (defined as an assault during which a perpetrator used force, threats, or incapacitation through drugs or alcohol)" So according to them 1 in 10 women was raped. But this is one of the questions they were asked. If they replied "yes"; then they were deemed to have been raped: "Someone had vaginal/anal/oral sex with me [o…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:33 PM
1

Take a look at one of the questions that gave this result below: "...among the control group that received brochures, about ten percent of the women reported they had been raped (defined as an assault during which a perpetrator used force, threats, or incapacitation through drugs or alcohol)" So according to them 1 in 10 women was raped. But this is one of the questions they were asked. If they replied "yes"; then they were deemed to have been raped: "Taking advantage of me when I was too drunk …
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:21 AM
2

The problem is not your mutilated penis. The problem is your mutilated mind. Note: You don't win any points for stating you're not going to sexually mutilate your kids. You're not supposed to sexually mutilate your kids.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 11:01 PM
5

That's exactly what I needed to hear Why not "hear" the truth, instead of the absurd idea that hacking-off a large part of your penis is a good thing? 1: Women prefer intact penises. Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html http://www.livescience.com/1624-stu…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:23 PM
40

To be clear: he's just resigned from one of his many various posts and positions. In this case, it was just an honorary professorship at UCL. He also works at the Imperial Cancer Research Fund — presumably helping to find a cure for (amongst other cancers) breast and cervical cancer. But of course the SWJs don't care about that — they just want their scalp.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:23 AM
7

It's just so bizarre — and yet it explains so much about a certain mindset. Honestly, I think it's pretty simple: if you have too much time on your hands, and spend too much time thinking, then you will go nuts.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 06:56 PM
2

You're awfully angry... … but don't worry — these little boys are really happy! LOL Happy Little Boys for /u/SCROTAL-SACK
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:37 PM
1

Im pretty fed up of the anti circumcision crowd attempting to belittle me or tell me Im delusional You're delusional LOL. Fuck Off
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:22 PM
1

er… you cite this article: http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(14)00036-6/fulltext This is not research by the Mayo Clinic. It's a publishing company owned by Elsevier, that licenses the Mayo Clinic name. It's charges "researchers" a handsome sum to have their "research" appear on their website. And they make a lot of money doing so! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayo_Clinic_Proceedings The "research" is authored by "Brian J. Morris" a known circumcision fetishist who is a mem…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:15 PM
13

I think articles like this are good news. It shows that many people in the Jewish community can see the rising tide against male genital mutilation around the world, and they feel the need to "soften-up" their readership to the coming new realties. It is all still going to take time for sure; but the eventual stopping of MGM is clearly on the agenda.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:56 PM
5

Agreed. Totally OK to have an online forum that deals only with direct female issues. Same goes for guys.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:01 PM
9

As a cut man with a normal donger Mutilated penis = "normal". Shows how delusional you are. Here's the truth: http://notyourstocut.com/2015/03/24/circumcision-ruins-the-glans/
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:18 PM
2

Just the sort of comment I would expect from a repressed homosexual. EDIT: As the man said: "Not that there's anything wrong with that…"
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:04 PM
8

Well, I'm glad you're not my Dad!
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:54 AM
23

Here you go. There is a great graph somewhere as well. This info stops people in their tracks, esp. women. Folks have no problems mutilating and harming males; but once it harms women - that's not allowed! http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/21672947/
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:24 AM
1

Not sure about the reference — but I'll take it as a compliment just to be on the safe side :-)
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:45 AM
46

I do see where they are coming from. Their sub is about women's issues, so fair enough. I suppose someone could start a thread detailing the damage that MGM does to women (the Danish study) and then see what happens!
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:31 AM
119

Yes, I know they are banning discussion of MGM in a thread about FGM; but none the less, I appreciate them calling mutilation mutilation.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:02 AM
5

First, you need an anatomy class. Second you need a human development class. Come on then big boy, try this: I've made you a simple multiple choice question with photographs to illustrate the point. Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? One is flesh removed from an infant girl during "female circumcision". and the other, flesh removed from an infant boy during "male circumcision". Note that you have to work out which picture is w…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:37 PM
6

Hack off part of an infant boy's genitals: Not Mutilation. Hack off part of an infant girl's genitals: Mutilation. Not wanting to discuss FGM when discussing MGM: Proof of Pro-Circ Troll.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:13 PM
5

The topic is whatever is required to demonstrate you are a hypocrite and a pro-circ troll.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 10:58 PM
3

Sure ;-)
/r/MensRights08/06/15 10:30 PM
3

The problem is you can't have a normal conversation on the subject Let's have a "normal" conversation about female circumcision then. Presumably you think that's not "mutilation" as well. You start — tell me some advantages.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 10:30 PM
5

You have a mutilated penis. But you are not smart or brave enough to acknowledge it. But the problem is not your mutilated penis. The problem is your mutilated mind.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 07:20 PM
2

The sad, yet hilarious aspect of all these videos is that none acknowledge that almost certainly all these "drinks" have been "spiked" with a very powerful and addictive drug that is widely available and is known to strongly lower social and sexual inhibitions. Not only that, it's widely available, and even taxed by the government… Yes: Ethyl Alcohol.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 06:03 PM
-1

Someone should make an alternative version—where the female asks, for tea, really enjoys drinking the tea, but then 15 years later decides that she doesn't like tea and retroactively withdraws her consent...
/r/MensRights08/06/15 05:50 PM
2

Let's just take a look at the pixs eh? http://notyourstocut.com/2015/03/24/circumcision-ruins-the-glans/
/r/MensRights08/06/15 05:46 PM
1

Seems OK now.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 10:45 PM
1

I don't know much about this, and I'm not a lawyer. Not that that would help, as different lawyers would have different opinions, and courts interpret things in different ways, and juries make different decisions. But I don't see anything wrong with what they are proposing. Have sex with someone who has passed-out, or incoherent, is rape (unless they agreed that you have sex with them whilst they were unconscious).
/r/MensRights06/06/15 09:12 PM
2

Very interesting — I will take a listen. More crazy "therapists" I think eh? The law in Scotland is very interesting. They just don't accept witness statements, as they are so unreliable: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corroboration_in_Scots_law I agree. Rapists can lie and you would believe them. False rape accusers can lie and you would believe them. So you need much more than that to convict.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:04 PM
5

Ultimately, there will be no escape. Over the next few days and weeks the op-eds and other articles will start to be published, and this insane video will become part of the fabric of the hoax-rape truths — alongside Rolling Stone/UVA and the many, many other well documented cases. The other killer, is that readers of the Guardian and HuffPo will be reading the articles, and then pop over to watch the "art" video. But boy-o-boy will then get a shock. Then even them will start to realise they've …
/r/MensRights06/06/15 05:15 PM
9

Agreed. /r/MensRights predicted that this is how The Guardian, HuffPost etc., would react. The porn videos she has made is just so terrible, and it so clearly demonstrates that she is off her rocker, that the only thing that these feminist news outlets can do is whistle in the wind and pretend that it's just an "art piece". I would love to have been at the editorial meetings when it was discussed. I'm sure their angle is that they all know she is demented, but they don't want to feed the "false …
/r/MensRights06/06/15 04:32 PM
3

Excellent points. There is a big movement around the world and in Israel itself to educate Jews about the truth of circumcision. Great website here: http://www.beyondthebris.com
/r/MensRights05/06/15 07:09 PM
7

Jewish father describes himself ritually torturing and sexually mutilating his own son — with a psychopathic justification "But the mohel with whom I had worked countless times suddenly handed me the knife. He pointed to my squirming son, whose hands and legs were tied to the board. The foreskin had been pulled up over the glans of the penis and was now protruding through a narrow slit of the small, stainless steel clamp....'It's the greatest honor a father can have,' he added....There is no gre…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:37 PM
4

Mohel tells the truth Watch this evil Mohel showing and boasting about the “instruments” he uses to torture and mutilate little Jewish boys. Or as he calls it: ”tickling” them. Evil child abusing Mohel Here he states quite clearly that the purpose of him mutilating little boys’ genitals is to damage their sexuality: Mutilate infants to damage their sexuality
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:35 PM
4

Thanks. You learn something new about this terrible child sex-abuse every day :-(
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:33 PM
1

Exactly. No problem here. Lock him up.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:23 PM
6

Exactly. It's just another "victim" trying to get sympathy votes.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:58 PM
3

Sorry to hear you can't read. Try looking at the links in the comments as directed in the title.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 12:03 PM
6

The "report" is as barking-mad as Tony is: For the purposes of this Statute: (a) "Group" means: a number of people joined by racial or cultural roots, ethnic origin or descent, religious affiliation or linguistic links, gender identity or sexual orientation, or any other characteristics of a similar nature. (b) "Group libel" means: defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group as defined in paragraph (a) – or members thereof – with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the gr…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 01:42 AM
6

"Blair says he will be campaigning to implement the recommendations of a report by the council which outlined legislative proposals to give greater power to judiciaries to prosecute hate speech, to lower barriers to what constitutes incitement to violence, and to make Holocaust denial illegal." Here is the "report". Search it for "feminism" & "circumcision": http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf Here are details…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 01:14 AM
175

Yep. And notice how the Guardian headline says "she had sex with"; rather than "sexually abused" the boy. If it had been a man, he would have been a "rapist" and a "peodophile".
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:45 PM
1

By the "bigger picture", I mean that men and women suffer terrible rapes and sexual abuse. Rape is also a very difficult crime to prove, and thus (rightly) many guilty people escape justice so that non-guilty people do not end up in jail. We need to constantly remind ourselves, and those we are communicating with, that we see and acknowledge this reality, and that false rape accusations are just *part" of this "bigger picture". If there were no genuine rapes; then there could never be false rape…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:21 PM
-1

Actually, I think that it's neither the father's nor the mother's business. Their daughter is an adult, and can do as she please. Unless she specifically requests the help of her parents, then I think her parents should just leave her to get on with her life as she thinks best. You do your best for your kids, and then when they reach the age of consent, they are on their own. On another note, any and all women who date or marry men who have more financial worth then they do, and/or have a higher…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:03 PM
8

Excellent point. One to remember.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 12:23 PM
1

Hits the spot for me every time :-)
/r/MensRights03/06/15 03:42 AM
3

There are 3 groups of personality disorders: A, B and C. You don't want to read the full list, 'cause you'll find like me, that you fit into most of them :-))) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_disorder#Cluster_B_.28dramatic.2C_emotional_or_erratic_disorders.29
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:05 AM
97

Excellent and important point. Let's remember that rape is a hideous crime; and it happens for real to both women and men. The exposure of false rapes is very, very important, but let's not lose sight of the bigger picture.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:42 PM
2

And why on earth is the Guardian giving so much coverage to USA police deaths? Have they nothing better to do. …oh, no, that's right, they don't.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:37 PM
3

In the main article, they mention nothing about gender; and in their big montage of victims, there is a female really large and prominent — bigger than any picture of a male.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:36 PM
2

Me too! I've thought about it a well.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:31 PM
3

Hans is the Man! http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_on_global_population_growth?language=en
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:34 AM
8

I'm not sure that part of it is due to Feminism. It's a world-wide issue, that is closely associated with education, literacy and increasing wealth. Even those bastions of feminism (joke) are starting the feel the pinch: Somalia, Ethiopia & Kenya: http://www.google.co.uk/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=sp_dyn_tfrt_in&idim=country:SOM:ETH:KEN&hl=en&dl=en
/r/MensRights01/06/15 11:33 PM
1

Agreed. Their delusion level is 10/10. Just remember that this case is one of the very best they could find! That's why it ended-up in the film.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 10:29 PM
2

Women: "Once we have a fair share of power in corporations and governments, we will make the world a better place — because women are different to men" Men: "Women are different to men" Women: "Sexism!"
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:53 PM
11

I agree. I think it's much, much higher than people think it is.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:22 PM
13

It's just such a wonderful and revealing article. Even Jezebel, with all their bile, now have to face the music and are getting frightened that feminists themselves are now generating so much ammunition that can be used against them. It's one thing getting hissy about some space tech-guys "sexist" shirt; but this sort of thing is in a different league of crazy.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 01:16 AM
1

Ah yes. I did not see that link at the bottom. Thank you so much — that is a much better reference. The quote are so very moving.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:22 PM
1

http://uncutting.tumblr.com/post/33511211108/quotes-from-mothers-who-observed-their-sons EDIT: More original source, kindly supplied by /u/rg57: http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:02 PM
2

http://uncutting.tumblr.com/post/33511211108/quotes-from-mothers-who-observed-their-sons
/r/MensRights31/05/15 02:47 PM
1

http://uncutting.tumblr.com/post/33511211108/quotes-from-mothers-who-observed-their-sons EDIT: More original source, kindly supplied by /u/rg57: http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm
/r/MensRights31/05/15 02:47 PM
2

This isn't a personal attack on you. Oh I don't know, I think I could manage that :-)))))
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:27 PM
1

Exactly. Same reason that so many defend the Jewish sect that sucks little boys mutilated penises and gives them herpes. The really unlucky ones die.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:25 PM
1

You're welcome!
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:46 PM
-2

Did that hit the spot for you darling?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:34 PM
-3

You've got an itch you just can't scratch eh? :-)
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:22 PM
3

Here's the book: "The Jewish Life Cycle". Pages 14-17: http://www.publishersrow.com/Book3623/AboutBookPreview/shid10_bid3623_fid31_pid349_clpg1_pg1_.htm?/nikenews_1/20.shtml
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:52 PM
2

Here's the book: "The Jewish Life Cycle". Pages 14-17: http://www.publishersrow.com/Book3623/AboutBookPreview/shid10_bid3623_fid31_pid349_clpg1_pg1_.htm?/nikenews_1/20.shtml And here's a modern-day video showing the practice of eating the foreskin in Madagascar (an island off the coast of southeast Africa). In this case the grandfather eats the foreskin with the tip of a banana. The tribe could be Muslim, Christian or traditional religion, I'm not sure. But often, the local practices overlap bet…
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:52 PM
4

"Creepy" is used by women to denigrate men when they just don't like the truth about something. Best not to use it here I think. "Libelous" [sic]: In most jurisdictions, for a statement to be libellous, it has to be false. This is not false. It's interesting how male genital mutilation has become so normalised, that people don't find the telling of the fact of amputating part of the genitals of an infant "demonising"; but eating the foreskin is demonising. Consider this: who cares what happens t…
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:47 PM
3

holy shit that's some scary stuff Agreed. It's getting serious when such people and newspapers etc., and writing such articles. Good to see they are finally getting the message.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 11:42 PM
1

Funny. And improvised as well!
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:38 PM
2

Good! Just as women want to "have" what men have, men decide that they don't want it anymore as it's a waste of their life. Really funny! Let the women take-over, and us guys can hang-out with our kids, go down the park, and have a beer with our mates.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:23 PM
12

The company concerned: "Intramed Medical Centre" is run by these two circumcision fetishists: http://circleaks.org/index.php?title=Neil_Pollock http://circleaks.org/index.php?title=Pierre_Crouse "In 2003 there were several complains to the College of Physicians & Surgeons of British Columbia about Pollock Clinics' advertisements. The base for the complaints was that these advertisements present a very one-sided view of circumcision, referring to [Edgar J. Schoen]'s website while failing to menti…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:13 PM
10

Agreed. Don't see a problem here… …now cut the end of the little boy's penis off just for a laugh.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:08 PM
13

And those male dental students who posted smut on FB might be banned from graduating! Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:14 AM
3

Google her name. She's a nutter.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:59 PM
2

Imagine if a male reporter did this to any female politician!
/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:48 PM
2

In Norway, only 1 in every 17,000 males is circumcised. It's tragic. As you walk the streets you see men and boys with pus dripping from their infected penises; and often you will find penises just lying by the side of the road where they have dropped-off. The hospitals are full of males with HIV, AID, UTIs, cancer of the penis etc. Every day, over a 1,000 men die from not having their penises circumcised. It's a national tragedy: for every 10 women there are only 6 men left alive. In 30 years, …
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:49 PM
1

Don't become this woman: Jewish mother bitterly regrets her son's circumcision https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfnqN3YgTd8
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:44 PM
1

If the boys are jewish they need to be cut. It's part of the whole faith journey that is an essential part of growing up jewish NOPE. You can have a normal, intact penis and still be Jewish. If you are Jewish and want to live is Israel, they don't inspect your penis... Jews & Israelis fighting against MGM The great Jewish people span the vast range of political and social viewpoints. And time and again, Jews are found at the forefront of civil rights movements. Even in Israel itself, more and mo…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:41 PM
5

Oh dear oh dear… the CDC and Mayo Clinic just parrots the AAP report: The American Academy of Pediatrics is a trade organisation, and exists for the promotion of its members - paediatric doctors. It is not, and never will be, a patient advocacy group. The AAP members make millions of dollars from circumcision infant baby boys, and millions more from selling the amputated foreskins for medical research and cosmetics: http://www.foreskin.org/f4sale.htm “It is difficult to get a man to understand s…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:33 PM
3

How can this be legal It's actually total illegal. But the law "tolerates" it along with society.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:10 PM
3

Medical Power of Attorney There is no "medical" reason to have 50% of the mobile skin of your penis hacked-off and thrown in the trash.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:09 PM
3

The same way that girls can suffer FGM around the world. US society has "normalised" male genital mutilation [MGM]; and the vast major of US men have mutilated penis with their foreskins being amputated when they were an infant. In most of the US, you would be considered a freak if you were not mutilated, and girls would find your penis repulsive. Plus there are strong religious groups who insist on genital mutilation, and the government are too weak to stand up to them.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:00 PM
2

Goldsmiths Students' Union is a registered charity, and receives a grant of about £600,000 per year from Goldsmiths University!
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:33 PM
10

Male genital mutilation is almost exclusively led, instigated and performed by men (worldwide); just as female genital mutilation is almost exclusively led, instigated and performed by women. But yes, I agree with you, we can't all take responsibly for things which we are not partaking in. So yes, I'll piss off
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:19 PM
6

Thanks for posting this difficult and brave question. And I can tell that you understand much of the knowledge surrounding FGM & MGM etc. Your BF is simply a victim of culture/religion and normalisation. He's no different to a loving mother in Egypt who insists on having her young daughter circumcised. So it's perfectly understandable that you would love him and want to marry him. And he's not an evil or bad person; and neither are you for wanting to be with him. But I'm afraid that logic and re…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:56 PM
11

Hideous result. But I'm not blaming the mother — she did all she could. I'm afraid it's us men who have to take the responsibility for these crimes.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 04:45 PM
11

It's not the real mattress she actually got "raped" on. I mean that mattress doesn't exist, because she was never raped. It's a lightweight, single, foam mattress, for "demonstration" purposes only that she purchased herself. Getit? "Demonstration". Oh well, please yourselves.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:29 PM
12

Someone please do a spoof auction of her mattress on eBay please.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:58 PM
4

Well she did it in the best place for her — she got off scott free. To be fair. Sweden is very liberal with it's criminals, and has a relatively low crime rate.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:33 PM
72

Of course the other outrageous point about this case, is that without the video, the boy would have been found guilty by default — even though it was she said/he said!
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:02 PM
7

I can see your point. But I consider someone her age more a "teenager" than a "child". She could quite legally have sex and get pregnant and have a baby.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:00 PM
8

Exactly. I thought that was a very coded criticism of her.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:40 PM
22

…er, the age of consent in Sweden is 15. She falsely accused the boy of rape, and he was also 15. He could have easily ended-up with a prison sentence and a child sex-abuse record. She should be punished accordingly.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:36 PM
2

The deal was done with the alleged attackers, because if a deal had not been done, then the alleged attackers could have appealed, and that would have taken a while, and by then, they would have graduated, because graduation was so close anyway: http://nomore.org/sarah-butters-life-jmu-spring-break-scandal/ And once again, even though her father was a police officer, she refused to take the allegations to the police for a criminal investigation to start.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:44 PM
9

No problem - click away everyone! http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/05/20/feminists-want-us-to-define-these-ugly-sexual-encounters-as-rape-dont-let-them/?hpid=z2
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:45 PM
6

Agreed. The other thing it will do is enable all the folks who are not brave enough to stand-up on their own and disown her; but will follow the lead of others who will.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:25 PM
25

Because: Folks have different gripes with different sites; so I just archive them all. The Washington Post - and other publications - sometimes have paywalls in one country, but not in others. And/or the paywall locks in once you have visited the site a certain number of times in a month etc. Articles like these with very "brave" titles, often get altered once the complaints start to roll in, so it's good to have the original accessible.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:13 PM
2

This looks to me like his ex-wife trying to take revenge on him by belittling his abuse as a child. And because he wife has claimed that it might "damage" their child, she almost definitely received Legal Aid in the UK, and all of this expensive legal saga will have been for by the UK taxpayer.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 03:37 PM
3

There is a tag attached at the front of the title that says "comments closed". You can add a comment, but it will not show-up in the list. This site will let you see deleted comments - very useful: http://uneddit.com The comments were becoming very abusive and personal. So as it's a woman and a SJW, the post goes straight to the top to be shut down!
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:46 PM
1

Sorry 'bout that. Put the correct link in.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 07:28 PM
4

Just for clarity: Paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger. The school in question takes children from 11 to 18, so I'm guessing that the girl was well into her teens. Men are predisposed by evolution to find teenage girls attractive, for that is when they are at their most fertile and fittest. There is nothing wrong in that. It's not unhealthy. And …
/r/MensRights19/05/15 05:52 PM
1

Did GK Chesterton understand the concept of "paragraphs" perchance? :-)
/r/MensRights19/05/15 05:25 PM
7

Hmmmm… Women trying to juggle career and motherhood: Depression, stress and unhappiness. Man trying to juggle career and motherhood [yes - motherhood]: Depression, stress and unhappiness. I wonder if there's a better way? Maybe one parent goes to work and other stays at home and looks after the kids? Radical, I know.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:51 PM
5

Yes. I have noticed this recently. It's just bizarre, they are going the way of the Guardian. Why on earth a newspaper want's to alienate 50% of their readership is beyond me. And the article is just up it's own arse. Men can't do anything right unless they are just a money tree.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:00 PM
2

Link so they don't get ad revenue: https://archive.is/BP1T9
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:59 PM
2

There are lot's of female muslims who have had their vulvas "snipped" and they thing nothing of it.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:39 PM
6

Absolutely. Another great woman helping the fight against FGM — there are many of them.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:54 PM
15

Could have been worse… :-) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/18/student-suspended-for-pop-tart-gun_n_2903500.html
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:38 PM
2

No injury/disfiguring involved. If anything it's the opposite of disfiguring. Looks better ;) Dream on buddy... http://notyourstocut.com/2015/03/24/circumcision-ruins-the-glans/
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:35 PM
2

Foreskin serves no purpose. Sure — thanks Mum! — LOL: 1: Women prefer intact penises. Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html http://www.livescience.com/1624-study-circumcision-removes-sensitive-parts.html 4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, there is no chan…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:32 PM
3

Oh dear oh dear… the Mayo Clinic just parrots the AAP report: The American Academy of Pediatrics is a trade organisation, and exists for the promotion of its members - paediatric doctors. It is not, and never will be, a patient advocacy group. The AAP members make millions of dollars from circumcision infant baby boys, and millions more from selling the amputated foreskins for medical research and cosmetics: http://www.foreskin.org/f4sale.htm “It is difficult to get a man to understand something…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:30 PM
1

You are correct in that the bill was never put before the EU Parliament. And thanks for making that 100% clear. I wrote that "they are seriously looking at [it]", and many such suggested statutes [in various areas of law] do make it to a vote and the law is enacted. So the suggested statute was just a few stops away from being voted upon; and you can bet there there are plenty of EU elected members who would vote for it!
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:24 PM
14

Parents have no rights over their children. They have responsibilities and privileges. The parents have their own rights as a human, and the child has his/her rights as a human.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:01 PM
4

The Guardian is the bible of the trendy champagne socialist left in the UK. It loses money hand-over-fist. It's not trying to appeal to a wider audience; rather it just wants to stick to its echo-chamber policy to pander to it's hard-core readership. It's really no different to the policies of Soviet Russia or China: you toe the party line, or you are "eliminated". At present, they can only delete your comments; but they are seriously looking at making criticism of "feminism" a hate crime, and s…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:53 PM
3

This post has trigged me. I'm feeling ignored.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:40 PM
1

I agree. He was relaxed and smiling, and by the end, the women were won-over to an extent: "why can't we all just get along"...
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:38 PM
3

You make some great points. Thanks. I think one of the main issues, is finding someone guilty based on witness identification alone. That's all he was convicted on. The Innocence Project has freed 235 people due to misidentification: http://www.innocenceproject.org/causes-wrongful-conviction
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:33 PM
2

I agree. I think even the Guardian has finally realised that if you keep ignoring the rights of 50% of your potential readership, then you are going to lose sales big time. Plus the UVA hoax rape case has shone too much light on the subject for it to be ignored. The detective on the ground was saying that false rape cases are not uncommon; but not common. So I would put that at 10-15% of all accusations reported to the police; including those where the girl gets back together with her boyfriend …
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:28 PM
1

Once you are a "victim" you are always a "victim". If you lied, someone must have "made" you do it! /s
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:20 PM
2

Exactly. They are just protecting themselves from the false rape accusation culture. /s ..or maybe not /s !
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:49 PM
16

The teacher went straight to to the head teacher when the girl said this to him. Too right. The girl is basically using a threat of accusing him of being a child sex-abuser to have him comply with her wishes and/or to bully him. The girl pupil should have been suspended at least; and it should be noted on her record that she may make false sex-abuse allegations.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:42 PM
4

Bill Burr tells it like is is! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM4FD-8znn0
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:41 PM
7

Agreed, but the first paragraph "trigged" me: "A UK woman, age 23, has pleaded guilty to a charge of perverting the course of justice this week. What did she do? In late 2013, she allegedly made a false rape claim." …er, no. Not "allegedly" — she pleaded guilty.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:18 PM
3

Exactly. In the USA in new born male infants; whilst in the Philippines, the boys are older: 7-12 years old.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:07 PM
3

Maybe I don't fully understand the article, but isn't it reactions of guys who WANT to have their penis circumcised by a beautiful girl? Correct. They are exhibiting early signs of "Circumcision Fetishism" where males get sexually excited by the idea of circumcision. There are a number of sites on the internet that cater to this fetish. Also, sometimes men get their penis cicumcised because of medical reasons, Correct. But that is very, very rare. In a non-circumcising culture/country like Finla…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:58 PM
9

This photograph is from the Philippines where almost all young boys have their penises mutilated for nothing other than social pressure. Can you imagine if the photograph was from Indonesia (where FGM is widespread and performed mainly in clinics and hospitals), and a handsome young man was smiling readying to mutilate a little girl's vulva?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:10 PM
20

The snake eats its own tail...
/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:15 PM
1

I'm not saying evolution is inefficient, I'm saying the things it produces are. Ha ha! I laid in bed pondering that trying to get to sleep — before you even wrote it :-) How can evolution have no purpose; but bodily organs that originate from evolution can have a purpose? Tweet Mr Dawkins and see what he says.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:29 PM
2

Also remember than Lynne Featherstone is Jewish, and so almost inevitably has been to child sex abuse parties where infant baby boys have had their genitals mutilated without even an anaesthetic. Everyone stands around laughing and making jokes as the boy is sexually abused. Some produce the very highest level of child pornography by taking video and photographs. Then everyone has a drink and a bite to eat. Meanwhile, the victim is taken into another room where the "wound" is "tidied-up".
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:05 PM
22

At least it looks like she will be charged. Of course she is still referred to as the "accuser", rather than the "false rape claim suspect" that she is. "The accuser, who was only referred to by her initials in charging documents, will be charged, Maciarello said." http://www.delmarvanow.com/story/news/local/maryland/2015/05/09/salisbury-crime-rape/27036435/
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:57 PM
2

I can see where you are coming from. Thank you. None of the body parts that you mention are "mistakes" that need to be "corrected". Evolution has no aim or purpose — it's blind. You can research each of the parts you have mentioned, and you will find that none of them are amputated from infants at birth as a matter of routine; and most if not all of them have function, despite what is commonly thought. The idea that the foreskin is some sort of evolutionary vestige is a lie put out by child-sex-…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:52 PM
2

If it has no agency or thought, then it cannot be efficient nor inefficient as it has no intended task. Same goes for cobbles. But we are just toying with each other :-) Yes, that's a great video. Dawkins says: "the imperfections are what you would expect from the accidents of history if there was no designer" Haha. So spot on. Genius.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:10 AM
1

You make some great and true points about evolution. Thanks. Of course, in the same vein, evolution never gets any thing "wrong", does not need "fixing" and is not "inefficient" nor "cobbles" things together. Evolution is just a blind process.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:39 AM
2

Agreed - but the video is so good, and her tone so persuasive, that it all comes out in the wash. It may be worth us trying to come up with a list of tweaks, and seeing if she's up for version 2. She also makes a direct mistake about the % of women who prefer uncircumcised men — she says "circumcised" when she meant to say "uncircumcised".
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:06 AM
3

Sorry - my reply was not right given your original comment! Thanks for your support. Take a look at the research in the comment below from MasterZapple. Given the huge controversies over autism and what may cause it, I have steered clear of the whole 'circumcision may cause autism' angle. In any case, it seems to be related to infant pain etc., not circumcision directly.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:03 AM
12

Thanks for your interest. The whole medical, benefits, harm, religious angles are really just pointless red herrings anyway. It's very simple. After 100 million years of human evolution, all males are born with a foreskin. No one has the right to amputate it, for no immediate and urgent medical reason, apart from the male himself when he reaching 18. Just think of a girl and her labia lips. Now think of a boy and his foreskin… Same thing. Same rules.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:08 PM
9

but women like have a say what do to mine? Let me guess now… when you were a helpless infant your mother (remember that woman?) decided to mutilate your penis by amputating your foreskin without your consent. And she paid a hack doctor $300 to wield the knife. Am I right LOL?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:42 PM
9

Circumcision in the USA is on a downward trend. In 1979, close to two-thirds of boys in the West underwent a hospital circumcision after birth, but by 2010 that percentage dropped to around 58%. http://healthland.time.com/2013/08/22/explaining-the-drop-in-circumcision-rates/ This is because more and more parents are learning about the damage that circumcision causes, and are not swayed by bizarre arguments like "silly" looking dicks and what other boys in the locker room may think. And folks fro…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:26 PM
-1

Get lost. I spotted her first. She's all mine...
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:43 PM
8

Fantastic. Jazz hands all round. Humor really is the way to fight this nonsense. Note that the video starts half-way though - please do play it from the beginning as it's all excellent!
/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:17 PM
6

She's jewish (not that there's anything wrong with that). But that means she almost inevitably attends child sex-abuse parties where infant boys have their penises amputated without anaesthetic. Everyone stands around laughing and taking pictures (producing what should be classed as the worst sort of child pornography) and then has a booze-up and a bite to eat.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 04:30 PM
15

She declared that half the electorate were useless, and then wonders why she was not re-elected!
/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:22 AM
11

The main picture with all the women with orange gear and hard-hats on is very telling. I wonder how many of the "one-third" are actually doing hard, manual labour, or operating machinery underground. Not many I reckon, their gear looks neat and clean, and there is no way you can work near machinery with long hair flowing freely.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:46 AM
1

You sound like you spent too long playing computer games and not living in the real world LOL.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 12:32 AM
2

Just be smart and encrypt them with a really good password and there will be no problem. Of course, if anyone gets to view all the tapes you will then be charged with multiple rapes because you failed to produce a signed and dated contract of sexual consent for each encounter...
/r/MensRights08/05/15 11:15 PM
2

Why do you need to justify your understanding of the situation? Why do you even care what the guy said? Listening to the guy is RAPE CULTURE. The girl claimed she was raped. End of story. Time for a lynching!
/r/MensRights08/05/15 10:08 PM
3

What's interesting, is how much you are projecting your imagining of what happened onto the reality of what he clearly describes in his written account of the events. You are convinced that the girl must be telling the truth, and that the man must be a rapist - because women never lie about being raped, and we must always believe the women. Once you have that trope firmly fixed in your mind, all that's left to do is to distort, interpret, re-imagine and manipulate what the man says until it beco…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 09:27 PM
2

…er why not? How do you know she is not going to testify to exactly that or something similar? At the start, there were 6 people together, including 4 witnesses, who were all getting along fine. Then the 4 left, and then she was allegedly raped. Maybe they both watched a movie before the alleged rape, maybe they didn't. And he may well testify to that, as possibly they did watch a movie, or at least snuggle-up on the couch. And it's not up to him to come-up with reasons as to why she might have …
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:30 PM
3

He doesn't need to "prove" anything. He is innocent until found guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. "We were all happy and cozy and having consensual sex and then she just suddenly went insane?" That is not credible. But this is "credible": "We were all happy and cozy watching a movie, and suddenly he raped me" Some men are crazy rapists - but it's rare. Some women are crazy batshit bunny boiling false rape accusers - but it's rare.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:15 PM
2

presumably rational woman Well, that's the question isn't it!! 13 Reasons Women Lie About Rape: http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/13-women-who-lied-about-being-raped-and-why-they-did-it/
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:44 PM
5

Exactly. I already know guys who do this, and NEVER show the recordings to anyone. And they store them for YEARS, as girls come back years later claiming "rape".
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:42 PM
0

Agreed. But I think that it's not unfair for women to be at least encouraged, as that help other women then step forwards. Strangely, I think it's possible that women may go through a stage of wanting to be MPs, bosses of companies, scientists etc., but then over time, the gloss will wear-off, and they might start to step back from these roles. Let's see.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:38 PM
9

What's really interesting about the comments, is how people are totally distorting not their "recollection" of the event that they may have experienced under pressure etc.; but their "recollection" of the fucking text that the OP has written and is staring them in the face! So "She fiddles with her phone a bit (reception is really bad in my apartment/area). I gently take it from her and put it down. She seems ok with this." Becomes: "You took her phone away" "she tried to escape into/with her ph…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:49 PM
-7

I don't think that the Labour losses have anything to do with the all female shortlist. And the SNP have wiped the board clean in Scotland with a good female leader, and 35% of their winning candidates women. Overall, winning female MPs now make-up over 30% of parliament, compared to 22% previously. I'm for human rights for all. Having a parliament that roughly reflects the demographics of the electorate is a good thing for all. I want to see the day when 50% of MPs are women.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:31 PM
16

Exactly. What a wonderful "1984" way of describing it though! It's a "problem" with the evidence, because there was none. And it must be a problem, because the "victim" must be believed, so the accused must be guilty, so if there is no evidence, that must be a "problem".
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:49 PM
1

Directed by a woman: Amy Berg. Thanks Amy! And to be clear; in these cases, it's other men doing the alleged abusing.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:13 PM
1

Apologies — I have amended my comment.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:40 PM
2

You say that: "In my jurisdiction the last time the charge was used it was a navel officer who lied about his rank." How much to you have to lie about your rank before it becomes rape? Is Captain to Admiral enough? What about Petty Officer 3rd Class to Petty Officer 1st Class - is that rape?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:40 PM
1

It's an interesting discussion for sure! What if a very good looking black man, say 35, put on make-up to make him look white? Then took a women back to his house and turned the lights off and had sex? The women than turns the lights on after the deed and sees he is black… Could that be classed as "rape by deception?". Could the woman claim rape? Or would that be racist? If the women was white could that be rape - but if she was black, it was not rape? The man in the article was: Old, bald, fat,…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 01:59 PM
20

Or a women with fake breasts trying to look 20 years younger? Or a women with a face lift trying to look 20 years younger? Or a women with lots of make-up trying to look 20 years younger?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 05:38 PM
18

Send me the name and address of your employer, and I'll drop them an email saying how you were once an accused rapist. Then let me email all your friends and family with the same story. Then let me set some websites up with the story and some pictures of you. I think you'll understand then LOL
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:18 AM
6

This is a fantastic and comprehensive article, and the authors 2nd article on the subject is also excellent: "Child Circumcision: Culture-based ignorance, fetish, and pseudoscience" http://madsciencewriter.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/child-circumcision-culture-based.html It's to be noted that the author is female, and she joins the long list of other women who have fought for decades against the sexual mutilation of infant boys. We all owe a big thanks to them.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:44 AM
5

Yeah. He's been roped into the whole thing, and he knows he has to tow the feminist line or he will loose his job. So he states how they can investigate online harassment. But even he knows that having your online virtual character in a 18+ imaginary game killed, tortured or raped is pushing it all a bit far… LOL
/r/MensRights02/05/15 12:13 AM
24

But send some nasty messages to a feminist, and you get real jail time! "Twitter troll jailed for 'campaign of hatred' against Stella Creasy A Twitter troll who bombarded Stella Creasy with messages calling her a witch and threatening her with rape has been jailed for 18 weeks" telegraph.co.uk
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:01 PM
5

http://abc7.com/news/baltimore-moms-son-im-gonna-do-better/688586/ "As for Graham, she said she hopes she's instilled in her son that violence is never the answer." …as she repeatedly strikes him about the head LOL.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 03:42 PM
7

Try this: You: Do you believe in equality of healthcare between men and women? Her: Heck yes! You: Do you believe that HIV drugs should be distributed equally between men and women? Her: Heck yes! You: When a vaccine is developed for protection against HIV, do you hope and pray that it will work equally well on women as well as men? Her: Heck yes! You: If manipulation of DNA leads to a cure for HIV in men, do you hope and pray that it will work for women? Her: Heck yes! You: Do you DEMAND that a…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 10:03 AM
2

Well they told the truth. Alcohol is the biggest and most effective date rape drug their is. But women are told it's their "right" to consume it until they're unconscious.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:22 AM
0

All circumcision does is prevent infection. Sure! — LOL: 1: Women prefer intact penises. Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html http://www.livescience.com/1624-study-circumcision-removes-sensitive-parts.html 4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, there is no c…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:43 PM
2

Barking, Barking Mad.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:53 PM
0

small window in which the baby still fits into the contraption. That's the truth. Can I use that phrase myself please?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:58 AM
1

Done! Thanks, I had not heard of that sub.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 09:15 PM
8

I can see where you are coming from, and you could be right. But I think we are all human, and it's good from time to time to be reminded of that. It's also good to get some perspective of the wider world. And sometimes we need to be reminded of what we are fighting for.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 09:15 PM
1

The contrast just kinda stood out for me...
/r/MensRights25/04/15 06:59 PM
3

Sigh. Sorry. I forget every time! Thanks.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:22 PM
6

Exactly. I had just the same thought!
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:54 PM
2

The Jewish lobby for MGM (not all Jews by a long-shot by the way), have stated quiet clearly, that the only way they can win their argument to keep mutilating boys' penises is to focus on the "health benefits". So you will see this sort of stuff come up time and again.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:27 PM
0

He goes even further than that, and states the damage it does to women. Of course if you quote this to anyone Jewish, then suddenly Maimonides is no longer a "Great Sage", but rather just a out-of-date old codger. "It is hard for a woman with whom an uncircumcised man has had sexual intercourse to separate from him. In my opinion this is the strongest of the reasons for circumcision." http://www.cirp.org/library/cultural/maimonides/
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:25 PM
7

Agreed. But as if that makes any difference! Who cares what the reason is? [I'm ranting at them, not you /u/Rex9] Is it OK to hack off parts of a little girl's genitals as long as I'm doing it for the "right" reasons?
/r/MensRights22/04/15 07:47 PM
30

To be fair, in the clip, Ava Vidal states that many female major campaigners against FGM say that MGM can be just as bad and should be banned as well. The jewish guy at the end is a total c**t and claims that his circumcision was "voluntary". He's in total denial. The other folks on the panel — male and female — are just ignorant, as are most people in the audience. Give them 30 minutes with me and I'd soon have them change their minds! And don't forget that there are so many women who are deepl…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:17 PM
8

And boys who are raped by women even have to pay child support!!
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:25 PM
1

FGM is a world apart. Nope. Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor in a modern hospital to shave off a tiny bit of flesh from the mound on the prepuce of the clitoris. ie: ju…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:19 PM
3

Great post. Thanks. And please remember when reading all the "pro" and "anti" circumcision research results, that you are ALL taking part in the largest ever scientific research program ever conducted... Your friends are also taking part, and your parents, and your grandparents. All your now dead relatives took part, and all their friends. Indeed every homo sapien that ever walked the earth — all 1.7 billion of them — took part. This experiment has been going on for around 250,000 years, and it'…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:42 PM
5

and babies don't make any of their own decisions, so that's a bad argument Just like all those female babies who are circumcised LOL. lowered risks of UTI, penile cancer and STD's is enough to make circumcision a legitimate parental decision. As a man you are far more likely to suffer from breast cancer than penile cancer. So let's hack-off all that breast tissue as well eh? And women are far more likely to develop cancer of the vulva then men are to develop cancer of the penis. Half of cancers …
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:52 PM
0

My understanding is that mutations are effectively random, and selected against or not. That is evolutionary pressure. The advantageous mutations are "selected" by reason that they increase the chance of offspring being produced and surviving. The foreskin was "selected" because it did that. It could not evolve just because it was neutral. But I think we agree!
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:49 PM
3

if you don't wanna be circumcised… then that's fine Yeah - like you had a choice in the matter eh? LOL
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:13 PM
0

I'm just highlighting why I think that one argument is silly. I think it's an excellent article for leaving the foreskin intact and not amputating it. What are the functions, properties and structure of the foreskin? I would think that having evolved only shows that foreskins didn't reduce the chance of successfully producing viable offspring If it didn't "reduce the chance" then what was the evolutionary pressure that caused it to be formed?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:59 PM
-2

That's not how civil discourse works. "Civil Discourse" does not involve sexually abusing children.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:55 PM
4

I wasn't really the same after that, my disposition was less trusting. I'm glad I was circumcised and I love my penis. Delusion. Right there.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:54 PM
-2

You can't even argue your point. Yes, I need to "argue" why it's wrong to sexually abuse infant boys.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:46 PM
4

/u/Mekroig: Thinks it's OK to skin little boys' penis — so his heart is full of "Love". /u/walkonthebeach: Thinks it's NOT OK to skin little boys' penises — so his heart is full of "Hate". Dream on...
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:18 PM
2

It does seem to all boil down to this sentiment Thanks. You are spot-on. Many men who have been mutilated as infants are unable to accept it, and will go to great lengths to save their psyche from the damage they will suffer when they realise it. But "better out than in" as a wise man once said.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:09 PM
4

"Exactly!". To you, mutilating the penis of infant boys has nothing to do with "sex". That is the classic defence of pedophiles everywhere. You might as well be "talking to a gorilla", but I am talking to a child sex-abuser.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:43 PM
2

I think you mean "Appeal to Nature" which is not to be confused with "Naturalist Fallacies". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature An appeal to nature would be: "herbs are natural; so herbal medicine is good for you". This is somewhat different to understanding evolution. The male human has evolved a foreskin over hundreds of thousands of years. This means that having a foreskin gives a reproductive advantage, e.g.: it gives the male a better chance of successfully producing offspring an…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:12 PM
5

Child sex-abuse may not be a big thing to you, but many other people are very concerned about it. I assume you don't care about infant girls having their genitals mutilated either?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:07 PM
6

No. But it will perhaps stop other infants from suffering genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:06 PM
5

Yes. I'm thinking of just trawling Reddit and commenting randomly on endless different subjects - none of which I know much about. Know anyone who can give me lessons on that? LOL
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:08 PM
1

Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor in a modern hospital to shave off a tiny bit of flesh from the mound on the prepuce of the clitoris. ie: just a tiny, tiny part is shav…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:37 PM
7

Circumcision only slightly reduces the sensation on a small part of your penis The Fox Who had Lost his Tail It happened that a Fox caught its tail in a trap, and in struggling to release himself lost all of it but the stump. At first he was ashamed to show himself among his fellow foxes. But at last he determined to put a bolder face upon his misfortune, and summoned all the foxes to a general meeting to consider a proposal which he had to place before them. When they had assembled together the…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:35 PM
3

most I've spoken to actually like it that way As you keep trying to convince yourself — LOL! Modern medical & scientific research is starting to unravel the amazing properties and functions of the foreskin. If you are interested in this subject, do take the time to watch the amazing video below. According to a number of leading researchers and scientists - including Ken McGrath, Senior Lecturer in Pathology at the Faculty of Health, Auckland University of Technology: "neurologically speaking, re…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:34 PM
2

It's also a BIOLOGICAL fact that you have more chance of suffering from breast cancer as a man as you do from suffering from cancer of the penis. So what? Are you going to have your breast tissue amputated?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:32 PM
12

All of your ancestors who died to give you the benefit of living your pathetic life You mean all of the 1.7 billion humans who have ever lived and evolved over 3.5 billion years of evolution and ALL of whom have a foreskin/prepuce. Those "ancestors" you mean?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:20 PM
16

I am circumcised. And I feel fine. Sure! — LOL: 1: Women prefer intact penises. Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html http://www.livescience.com/1624-study-circumcision-removes-sensitive-parts.html 4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, there is no change to …
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:19 PM
5

although it was not violent or threatening, it’s disrespectful "disrespectful" - sums it all up. Straight out of 1984 and the "Stalin Handbook on Human Rights". Translation: "You don't agree with us"
/r/MensRights19/04/15 12:44 AM
3

Hilarious! At 1:52 the "Geek Feminism Wiki" has a section on "Trigger Warnings". And there's a "Trigger Warning" about the section on "Trigger Warnings". How about a Trigger Warning, to warn about the Trigger Warning about the Trigger Warning article? I guess it's turtles all the way down… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down
/r/MensRights19/04/15 12:16 AM
0

No one feeds an ungrateful dog. OK. I let that "sink in" and... Nope. Love would be feeding an ungrateful dog. And plenty of dogs show love for folks who don't feed them. …your most likely confusing them with cats :-)
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 10:35 PM
-2

Got it? Nope. My dog loves me. I value that very highly. I don't have to do any work at all for that. My friend is a banker and works 6 days a week 10 or more hours a day. He earns millions, but has no life. No "value" there.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 09:57 PM
-1

Oh yes — the "anger" phase… Does that come before or after the "marry a 9 year old and fuck her" phase?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 09:55 PM
-5

WOW! A muslim SJW on TheRedPill. Did you get a little lost on Reddit? LOL! Yes it's true. People in "Third" world countries can't find any water to drink or food to eat, and it's never sunny: http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21613349-end-century-almost-half-worlds-children-may-be-african-can-it But they all walk around draped in gold chains and pearl necklaces. Now be a good boy and toddle off back to /r/spacedicks — your usual hangout.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 07:48 PM
3

Many thanks. archive.today is also good when you don't want to send traffic to a site where they will get advertising funds from the number of clicks!
/r/MensRights18/04/15 03:57 PM
1

Can't read this article because it's behind a paywall. Please can you paste the link to here, and post the new link; http://archive.today Thanks!
/r/MensRights18/04/15 03:28 PM
-19

He then explains that anything in this world that has value was made difficult to acquire. I don't value this guy at all. Water, sunshine, food - all easy to acquire, and far more valuable than gold, pearls or oil.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 02:21 PM
2

Indeed - and it looks like "anyone" did! LOL I've put a correction in my comment - thanks.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:36 PM
2

The woman at 0:30 says she only like men who have been genitally mutilated when they were infants. She can't handle a normal penis. And all the other women who like "large" penises are basically saying that they have loose, baggy vaginas.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:39 PM
2

This could be a good documentary, and Louis Theroux can be a good presenter. But always be cautious with the media. They have an agenda, and that agenda can change. They may say one thing to entice you in; but then the final result can be edited, rearranged and distorted to say something totally different. So they may claim to be sympathetic to fathers; but then you may discover (too late) that the producer and editors are rad fems and everything is done to make a dad look weak, bitter, cruel an…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:33 PM
23

I just couldn't believe that this is not a satirical video, and not a true TED talk. But alas, I think it's real. Here's the best comment from YouTube: 'I remember a few years ago on the internet when sexbots were first being discussed as a serious future. Everyone was saying "Women will be up in arms about it, and feminists will try to maintain their sexual power position by crying rape." Honestly, I didn't believe it. I thought that it was a funny hypothetical to shit on 3rd wave radfems. Than…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:44 PM
3

Thanks for this — it's a excellent article that I had not come across before.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 10:16 PM
2

My bad — that's 3 cases of 4th degree sexual assault charges. But all from students of the same school. I think these cases are very difficult. He could easily be guilty; or just as much, the kids could have got together to concoct some story to get at him — and it's all got out of hand.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:23 PM
2

You could try reading the article :-)
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:10 PM
1

Difficult. He has 4 other cases yet to go to trial, and he has agreed to resign voluntarily. EDIT: 3 cases. Sorry
/r/MensRights11/04/15 07:59 PM
1

This guy is a psychopathic serial rapist. He got 10 years, when he should be spending the rest of his life in prison to keep him safe from women everywhere. When he's released he should be monitored just as the article says. He gets ZERO sympathy from me, and my heart goes out to all his victims.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 01:25 AM
1

Keep dreaming buddy...
/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:10 PM
2

Thanks - the link on their front page was spinning the story as a bad thing and said the guy was 18 (when he was 17 when he committed the crime). But the link has been modified now.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 06:53 PM
13

If every young person who has sex with someone under the age of consent (16) in the UK was prosecuted, the courts would be overwhelmed.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:09 PM
2

Congratulations! on winning the "Mine is the Best Penis" contest You have won a luxury Infant Circumcision Trainer Kit CLICK HERE This authentic life form product, will give you hours of pleasure, practicing mutilating the genitals of little boys in the safety of your own home. Soon you'll be ready to start slicing away the flesh of real infants. Please specify your color of choice: Black, Brown or White. Replacement trainer foreskins just $5.75 each. And there's more: Download our "BabyTorture"…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:13 PM
1

I've never met a person in real life who believes circumcision is wrong. Well take a look at your penis, and then compare it to these pictures. Which set of pictures does your penis look like? http://notyourstocut.com/2015/03/24/circumcision-ruins-the-glans/
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:46 PM
1

I'm glad my parents decided to do it. Sure you did — LOL: 1: Women prefer intact penises. Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html http://www.livescience.com/1624-study-circumcision-removes-sensitive-parts.html 4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, there is no …
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:43 PM
8

Interesting how the truth about FGM is now starting to permeate into the mainstream. Many people working in the field in Africa against FGM for instance are tired of the lies that are told in the west. And it's these lies that are use to support MGM in the west.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:56 PM
2

This part is also bizarre. The alleged victim is portrayed as helpless and without responsibility or accountability. http://www.evawintl.org/PAGEID2/Best-Practices/FAQs/Reluctant-Victims "Investigators also must not tell victims that they need to cooperate in order to prevent the suspect from sexually assaulting anyone else. This puts an inappropriate burden upon the victim for behavior that is clearly the suspect’s responsibility. Imagine that I know a man who has raped a women. Is it OK for me…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:22 PM
4

I would imagine that when it comes to compiling the figures for the number of rapes, that all these false accusations are included. But when it comes to compiling the figures for the number of false rapes they are excluded, because they don't count!
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:12 PM
1

This is a really amazing read — false rape reports at 52%!
/r/MensRights08/04/15 07:11 PM
2

This article & seminar actually condones male sexual abuse: “A lot of people think it’s going to ruin the mood,” Ms. Yoder said. But practicing affirmative consent doesn’t mean you have to act like an unromantic robot. Ms. Hawkins recalled a suggestion from a man in this semester’s seminar: “If my partner grabs my hands and puts them on their butt cheeks, I know I have permission to have my hands on their butt cheeks.” …er, did your "partner" ask your consent to grab your hands and put them on h…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:07 PM
2

Got to love Fox News on this one. Megan is spot-on at the very end. And the two "friends" are fab as well - measured, well balanced and mature.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:57 PM
2

Will download and read for sure. Many thanks.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:25 PM
21

So according to your logic /u/jo939 you are not proven innocent of raping this women, as there is a "lack of evidence" that you did. Can you please post your real name, address and photo to Reddit so we can all ID you and warn our friends etc., that you are a potential rapist who has not been "proven innocent"?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:59 PM
2

The frat seem very smart. They are going to sue the RS mag; but I reckon they will offer to donate any financial award to anti-rape groups etc. Smart.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:16 PM
4

Congratulations! You have won a luxury Infant Circumcision Trainer Kit CLICK HERE This authentic life form product, will give you hours of pleasure, practicing mutilating the genitals of little boys in the safety of your own home. Soon you'll be ready to start slicing away the flesh of real infants. Please specify your color of choice: Black, Brown or White. Replacement trainer foreskins just $5.75 each. And there's more: Download our "BabyTorture" app from iTunes to add the realistic sounds of …
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:10 PM
4

/u/TrollaBot Live_Pool
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:09 PM
2

Jessica says "they’re still blaming the victim". How is there still a victim? Exactly. It's beyond bizarre and has entered 1984 territory.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:02 PM
3

Sure - enjoy! LOL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1kSx4TkuRo
/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:12 AM
25

Wow. I missed that line.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:05 PM
4

Exactly! e.g.: No sane women would just walk-up to men and try and kiss them; so if one does, then she must be mentally ill, which means that the man is guilty of sexually assault, but the women is not...
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:01 PM
10

You can bet that if most of the guys in the video engaged in kissing with the girl, then they would all have been accused of rape because clearly the girl was mentally ill, and thus could not consent. /s
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:32 PM
135

Nowhere in this article is this crime described as it should be: extreme domestic violence and genital sexual abuse. Instead it's labeled "catharsis".
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:21 PM
6

She is on video declaring that male genital mutilation is just as bad as female genital mutilation. She gets my vote.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:08 PM
3

18 years is a long time. But this was a systematic, considered, and consistent cruelty, that only a sociopath or similar could enact. He much have read thousands of begging and pleading letters from traumatised women, and just laughed at them. I can quite imagine that many women would be really traumatised and caused great pain by this. Not all the women; but quite a good percentage. And to top it all, he then extorted money from them. So 18 years is a long time; but he gets no sympathy from me.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:40 PM
6

The crazy thing is that far, far, far more men and women suffer illness and death because they are overweight. Even being a few pounds overweight has been shown to increase your chances of a host of diseases. Why not ban overweight people then from TV shows, movies, adverts etc? That would make far more sense. …but then the Fat Feminists would start going crazy!
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:33 AM
2

Thank you for the excellent links. The course looks very good indeed. Fair to everyone. As I understand it, it was Ched Evans himself who spoke to the police without a lawyer and said he had sex with the women concerned with her consent. But she said she could not remember anything about the night, and thus the stage was set for him to be prosecuted for rape. If he had said nothing to the police (which is his right), then he would have never been subject to the unfair prosecution. Here's the vid…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:03 PM
3

As per the article, they are giving it to both the male and female teams. If it's the same training to both, then that's fine by me.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:06 AM
3

You laughed until you stopped laughing. Well done ;-)
/r/MensRights01/04/15 02:17 AM
4

Reverse genders and a couple of other things: "Gay Jewish black African male couple spend £13,000 on mail order Danish semen so their kids will be blonde with blue eyes…"
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:10 PM
6

"At least with a Dane we knew our baby would be attractive and blonde like us" Well take a look at their pictures if you want a laugh…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:07 PM
1

Sorry comrade, I mis-spoke. I shall ship myself off to the nearest re-eduction camp ASAP. :-)
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:04 PM
1

"Adult circumcision is especially common for Jews who grew up in Soviet Russia, where the procedure was forbidden. That was the case for Leo, who was cut when he was 13." …er, since when is a 13 year old child considered to be an "adult"?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:41 PM
32

"Young people are turning to the internet to learn about sex and relationships," So? There is a lot of very good information and support on the internet about those subjects. "We know they are frequently stumbling across porn, often unintentionally" Ha ha! Sure. Pull the other one. "Stumbling", "unintentionally" LOL "And they are telling us very clearly that this is having a damaging and upsetting effect on them." What do you expect that 13 year old boys and girls are going to tell you about it?…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:34 PM
1

It's what you are doing in your "free time" that worries me...
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:27 PM
1

"The subject" is that you seem to be sympathetic to grown men sucking the penises and/or mutilating the genitals of infant, and you claim it's "not sexual". Just like all those priests who claimed that they were "just helping the boys in the showers to wash their penises properly"
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:11 PM
2

Trying to change the subject eh? Guess you still don't even find old men sucking the bleeding mutilated penises of infant boys "sexual"? Perhaps you have an inclination that way yourself? — do tell, there's a good chap.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:06 PM
4

Why not have some fun and combine both together? Then add a dash of herpes virus and a painful death. http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Metzitzah_b'peh http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2304793/Two-babies-stricken-HERPES-ritual-oral-blood-sucking-circumcision-New-York-City.html But don't worry, because you really don't think it's sexual LOL.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 05:54 PM
7

Man sucks infant's penis = child sex abuser. Man takes knife and amputates large part of infant's penis = not a child sex abuser. LOL Sex abuse is about power and control, not about "sexual pleasure" - just ask any rapist.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 05:07 PM
7

Male circumcision (male genital mutilation - MGM) is pure child sex-abuse. You would think that after all the endless child sex abuse scandals involving religions in Ireland, that finally, infant baby boys' genitals would be free of interference. But no, the abuse goes on.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:12 AM
0

So someone (not me thank you) posted a story about how their MIL (mother-in-law) had just taken her baby daughter to be circumcised without the parents' knowledge. OP said she was from (and lived) in California and married to someone from the Middle East - an Arab guy. The parents were now going crazy and had called the police. It was so obviously a troll post, as the OP described how they had had their son circumcised because it was cleaner and healthier etc. But female circumcision was totally…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:08 AM
1

So someone (not me thank you) posted a story about how their MIL (mother-in-law) had just taken her baby daughter to be circumcised without the parents' knowledge. OP said she was from (and lived) in California and married to someone from the Middle East - an Arab guy. The parents were now going crazy and had called the police. It was so obviously a troll post, as the OP described how they had had their son circumcised because it was cleaner and healthier etc. But female circumcision was totally…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:01 AM
7

@ 2:15 in the video: "ultimately when it comes to circumcision, it's a personal preference" Well whether he's talking about circumcision or "reversal", it's not a "personal preference" in either case. It's not like you are choosing the paint colour for your kitchen. The infant boy has no choice in the matter; and as there is no such thing as a full and complete "reversal" (indeed, not even close), then the adult male has no choice either. The final line says it all: "are you having fun yet ladie…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 12:22 PM
2

Yes - I felt that some of them know it's bad, but they can only gently push viewers in that direction.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 02:35 AM
2

Sorry. I think it's USA only. Try Hotspot Shield, and that will give you a USA IP address. Then you can view everything I the USA!
/r/MensRights28/03/15 02:25 AM
2

Always forget to do that. Thanks - I will remember in future.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 01:42 AM
2

Exactly. Who cares. Going bald is totally natural, and we just need to learn to adapt to it. How many celebs/sports stars/movie stars are bald and look great? Not that that should really influence us. If someone - male or female - makes fun of your bald head, then just chill. You will look all the stronger for it. Lets not start feminising ourselves, please.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 08:19 PM
1

That was easier - thanks! Yes, you are right :-)
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:11 AM
2

It's too late at night I'm afraid: I just can't work your comment out. I'll try again tomorrow.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:01 AM
15

"Change is not going to come from focusing on the small things that actors say.” I'm not so sure :-)
/r/MensRights25/03/15 07:33 PM
2

Plenty of "mistakes" have been made by hospitals, where they have mutilated ("circumcised") infant boys, even though the parents have expressly forbidden it. In some cases, it seems they have done it deliberately out of spite. So do be careful.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 11:22 PM
1

Yes… I'm sure you sit around with your female friends/mother/girlfriend/wife and tell them their genitals are "gross" LOL. You know - just for fun!
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:37 PM
5

If I may be so bold: There is nothing "Eww" or "gross" about this amazing part of the human body. One of the main reasons that so many male infants are mutilated in this fashion, is that society has come to see the foreskin as something dirty and unnatural. So please don't perpetuate this abuse by use of such language — especially in this subreddit. Thanks!
/r/MensRights23/03/15 06:04 PM
4

I'm not sure that circumcision is the "cure" in this instance, anymore than the foreskin is the "cause".
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:12 AM
5

As always, it's best to read the original article the woman wrote. It's quite short and punchy. Her overriding point seems to be that she feel that kids of female gay couples should be allowed to morn the loss of their father: http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/17/dear-gay-community-your-kids-are-hurting/
/r/MensRights20/03/15 04:26 PM
1

I pretty much agree with you. I will hit the delete button!
/r/MensRights19/03/15 08:56 PM
1

I think they're Dutch, so that kinda explains it I guess. The full drivel can be found here: https://vimeo.com/106218502
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:16 PM
3

The American Academy of Pediatrics... Oh dear oh dear… The American Academy of Pediatrics is a trade organisation, and exists for the promotion of its members - paediatric doctors. It is not, and never will be, a patient advocacy group. The AAP members make millions of dollars from circumcision infant baby boys, and millions more from selling the amputated foreskins for medical research and cosmetics: http://www.foreskin.org/f4sale.htm “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when …
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:23 PM
4

I get by just fine… Sure you do, LOL: 1: Women prefer intact penises. Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html http://www.livescience.com/1624-study-circumcision-removes-sensitive-parts.html 4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, there is no change to lasting lo…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:14 PM
14

One could call it that yourself; but you might not say that to the person who has had it done. You could argue that tattoos are multination, or even ear piercings.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:17 AM
15

If over 18 and fully informed, then I don't have a problem what you do or what you call it.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:02 AM
8

un-ironic up votes. Yes. A particularly satisfying type of up vote :-)
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:01 AM
12

un-ironic up votes. Yes. A particularly satisfying type of up vote :-)
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:01 AM
21

Ha ha - that was me :-)
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:59 AM
52

Well done. I find it funny that they "tried to talk [you] out of it". i.e.: tried to talk you out of NOT mutilating your son's genitals!
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:07 AM
1

Many thanks — but to be clear, it was not me who posted on Mumsnet! I just saw it in Google and then saw that it had been deleted by the Mumsnet Mods. So I linked to it here. It's a great post for sure. I don't know who the OP on Mumsnet is.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:56 PM
2

Many thanks — but to be clear, it was not me who posted on Mumsnet! I just saw it in Google and then saw that it had been deleted by the Mumsnet Mods. So I linked to it here. It's a great post for sure. I don't know who the OP on Mumsnet is.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:55 PM
23

Many thanks for your reply, and I send you all my very best wishes. I of course totally agree with you - the idea that one would mutilate the genitals of any child, male or female, to prevent disease in themselves or others is just insane. To be clear: my post here is illustrate the hypocrisy of sites like Mumsnet where they will happily discuss mutilating infant boys' penis and all the "health benefits"; but censor any discussion about doing the same to little girls.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:35 AM
7

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 02:51 AM
9

No big deal eh? 1: Women prefer intact penises. Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html http://www.livescience.com/1624-study-circumcision-removes-sensitive-parts.html 4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, there is no change to lasting longer during sex. Sourc…
/r/MensRights15/03/15 02:41 AM
2

These photographs show the amount of delicate nerve-laden skin a male loses when his foreskin is amputated: http://imgur.com/a/9dULC EVERY "circumcision" is botched.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 02:40 AM
4

rarely an issue in places like America Sure - LOL: http://www.circumstitions.com/Restric/Botched1sb.html
/r/MensRights15/03/15 02:25 AM
1

I have seen people committed to the ritual genital mutilation of infant males state quite clearly, that they know that once prosecutions for FGM start, the next step will be the banning of MGM. So it may be the case that FGM is not prosecuted, so that the righteous anger of the population is focused on that outrage, and does not turn it's sight to MGM.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 06:49 PM
3

Excellent. FYI you are missing the "e" of the end of "semite".
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:27 PM
3

Well done :-)
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:10 PM
13

"women don't hate jews. But it wouldn't matter if they did" "women don't hate gays. But it wouldn't matter if they did" "women don't hate blacks. But it wouldn't matter if they did" "women don't hate the disabled. But it wouldn't matter if they did" …do any of those sound acceptable?
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:18 PM
6

Evil. Imagine this was a female who needed a clitoris transplant. No mention in the article the MGM is wrong and on a par with FGM. NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://youtu.be/WPthgNqG1YY?t=2m20s NSFL: Warning! Horrific photo collection from a Dutch doctor of hundreds of mutilated, amputated and seriously infected penises (many with gangrene) of African boys and men as a result of "male circumcision" - ie: …
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:16 PM
2

Evil. Imagine this was a female who needed a clitoris transplant. No mention in the article the MGM is wrong and on a par with FGM. NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://youtu.be/WPthgNqG1YY?t=2m20s NSFL: Warning! Horrific photo collection from a Dutch doctor of hundreds of mutilated, amputated and seriously infected penises (many with gangrene) of African boys and men as a result of "male circumcision" - ie: …
/r/MensRights13/03/15 05:55 PM
5

Do a Google search and start learning about the functions of the foreskin and the damage that was caused to you. No problems with someone reaching 18 and deciding to have it done. It's the forced genital mutilation of infant boys that folks object to.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:22 PM
13

Ban female circumcision? I think that might be going too far. If I want my daughter to look like me, how is that the government's business? It's a cultural practice that has been going on forever. FTFY
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:10 PM
9

Hacking off any part of the human anatomy has "health benefits". Same goes for when someone steal the wheels off your car: you have the "benefits" of never having to put air in your tyres and you will never suffer a puncture.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:57 PM
71

Sigh. This is why I like Reddit. You are spot-on.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:12 PM
1

Thanks — I need to learn to start doing this when posting links!
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:44 PM
1

Just laughed out loud when I saw this picture — you will need to scroll down a bit in the article to see it. I mean does she really have no idea? She is wearing a plunging neckline, and even seems to have a button undone. She is clearly displaying her breasts for all the multitude of reasons that females do, not that there's anything wrong with that as the man said. But she throws her toys out of the pram when a young women shows the whole lot for some cash. Clueless.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:12 PM
9

Maybe "half-a-shirt's" worth of ironing cute :-)
/r/MensRights07/03/15 11:58 PM
3

Excellent article.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:40 PM
7

It's Not About The Nail https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4EDhdAHrOg
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 08:18 PM
1

Agreed. What the guy did was illegal and rightly so. All I would say, is that after reading the article, he seems to have faced up to his behaviour, and not made any excuses.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 08:36 AM
6

Just remember that EVERY day is International day of 100% tolerance of male gentital mutilation .
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:56 PM
11

Ah yes. The Telegraph Survey that found: "One in three UK female students sexually assaulted or abused on campus" Would that be the "survey" that the Telegraph actually will not actually publish? I have emailed the author and several others at the Telegraph, to ask for the "survey" to be published in full; but they have not replied.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:53 PM
3

I know, I know… The Telegraph has even started to go that way as well.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 06:29 PM
8

I just don't believe this story, it just seems so righteous and self-serving. The (male) troll claims: "I think my anger towards you stems from your happiness with your own being. " & "when men hate themselves, it’s women who take the beatings." Then the "troll" says how he is reformed and become a "teacher" and — get this — "he gets so many hugs now [from his pupils]". Yeah, right, a male teacher hugging his school pupils. And the language is all so perfect. The writer is "flooded with pity", a…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 06:27 PM
8

EVERY taxi driver I meet, I tell them to buy a dash-cam off ebay, with a front and rear facing camera. This way they can film what happens in the cab and outside it. The one pointing inside, needs to keeps it's footage for at least a few days, so that all those "late" rape accusations can be dealt with. Some also record sound, which is a real plus.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 06:32 PM
1

You are welcome. Not only that - are some "benefits" of female circumcision. Female Circumcision & Health Benefits "Stallings et al. (2005) reported that, in Tanzanian women, the risk of HIV among women who had undergone FGC was roughly half that of women who had not; the association remained significant after adjusting for region, household wealth, age, lifetime partners, union status, and recent ulcer." Note: when it's found that circumcising female genitals reduces HIV/AIDS it's called a "con…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:32 PM
2

Fuckin article limits… Just turn on private browsing, and all will be OK.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 11:07 PM
7

Yes — and I emailed the author of a previous article about that "survey" to obtain a copy, but of course she never replied. So you can't actually read the "survey" anywhere.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:07 PM
13

Unbelievable. OK, not unbelievable, because this nonsense is happening more and more. She wanted "counselling" from the University; and blames them for making her PTSD "so much worse". "Victims shouldn’t be forced to report what happened to them to the police – reliving what they’ve gone through should not be a compulsory part of getting help." … no of course not. The alleged attacker should be left to possibly assault more women (if that is proven what he did). EDIT: Sarcasm.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:22 PM
3

because there is no specific aim to cause harm... Here's some reading for you... Female Circumcision Does Not Always Reduce Sexual Experiences "International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown: Female genital cutting in this group of women did not attenuate sexual feelings: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01550.x/abstract "The Journal of Sexual Medicine" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown: Pleasure a…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:03 PM
3

the aim of circumcision is not harm But harm it does... Here is an in-depth scientific discussion about this subject; this is all emerging research, and goes against the generally accepted views on these matters. Some people get very angry when they read such research; but I urge you to be scientific and objective: Modern medical & scientific research is starting to unravel the amazing properties and functions of the foreskin. If you are interested in this subject, do take the time to watch the …
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:01 PM
2

the practice of FGM is different and the most severe forms of FGM are true mutilation in every meaning of the word. Oh dear... NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://youtu.be/WPthgNqG1YY?t=2m20s NSFL: Warning! Horrific photo collection from a Dutch doctor of hundreds of mutilated, amputated and seriously infected penises (many with gangrene) of African boys and men as a result of "male circumcision" - ie: sexua…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:00 PM
6

they are not equal Nope. Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor in a modern hospital to shave off a tiny bit of flesh from the mound on the prepuce of the clitoris. ie: just …
/r/MensRights29/01/15 12:59 PM
2

Maybe this is not the right place to post this, so mods feel free to do your duty! But I thought is was just such a good story to illustrate where we are all at. I'm sure you folks will have some good comments and points to make...
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:08 AM
1

You could be right! But most such seating does have a way of delineating each person's space. You can see a join under her legs, as if that is where two seats join. But then you can't see other joins giving the nature of the photograph. And yes, it's totally sad I am "discussing" this!! Sorry.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:20 PM
16

Take a look here: Tom Hanks is "Manspreading"; but the women - Christine Baranski - is sitting in the middle of two seats and has her bag on the side! http://www.buzzfeed.com/alisonvingiano/not-the-polar-express#.sk9K8kO1J
/r/MensRights25/01/15 03:36 PM
2

See how the need to change the "crushing" hours worked in the film business before they think it's right for them!
/r/MensRights25/01/15 03:30 PM
1

Watching the news video is enlightening. The male news reader at the end is trying to defend her — but the female news reader implies she got what she deserved! ie: the man doesn't understand wants to hand out a pussy pass. But the women knows all too well how deceptive and evil a women can be.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 04:54 PM
3

It's just amazing that this is allowed. It's attempting to make a joke or word-play about a women sexually attacking a man by kicking his testicles. All the organisations concerned will have very strict policy on gender equality/sexism etc. The Lottery Fund Sport England etc.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 12:14 AM
28

The good news is; that almost all doctors and medical personnel are refusing to perform MGM on new born babies — they are repelling.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 08:45 PM
1

Always make sure that you are the crazy one.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 12:44 AM
0

Yes. Others have said it could be due to intermarriage (there is a more medical term - but I can't remember it). eg: Jews & Muslims can often end-up marrying close relations (or at least closer than the general population); and this causes all sorts of health issues.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:08 PM
16

Sorry, but the study did not find that circumcision doubles chance of autism. It simply found that there was a correlation; and the authors are careful to point-out that that does not mean causation.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 01:12 PM
20

That's exactly what I thought. My heart goes out to this girl, and all the boys and girls, and men, and women, who are trafficked and suffer like this. But why put this 110 figure in? It's just silly.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 12:58 PM
4

Yes, I have noticed this disturbing trend recently — they really seem to be going the way of the Guardian. Strange and sad. And it the same old crazy statistics: "The Telegraph’s survey has found that one in three women experience sexual assault while at university." But of course when you read the actual "survey" then some guy brushing a bit too close to you in a bar counts as "sexual assault". Hold on a minute — the actual survey is nowhere to be found!
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:58 PM
3

The judge also said that clearly Male Circumcision was a "serious harm".
/r/MensRights20/01/15 01:35 AM
2

Exactly. But you'll find endless posts like this on Reddit and elsewhere; and most of them are just made-up. My favourite is: "my best friend's friend's step-son was not circumcised at birth, and he developed terrible penis infections and his penis almost fell-off…"
/r/MensRights17/01/15 03:09 PM
3

Yes! It's like a snake eating it's own tail!
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:42 AM
2

Actually, you are totally correct! Would you like me to delete it?
/r/MensRights16/01/15 12:45 AM
16

It is not the place of the judiciary to decide matters of science. The judge is not deciding a matter of science. He's looking at the law as enacted by Parliament — which is (hopefully) partially based on science as well as ethics, common practice, what is seen a right, etc. He's commenting on the fact that even a pin-prick to a girls' vulva is considered to be "serious harm" in the eyes of the law, whilst an infant boy can have a very large part of his penis amputated for no medical reason, as …
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:30 PM
7

Amazing news. Now there is a UK High Court Judge to reference in those arguments: Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division. Full judgement here: http://www.jordanpublishing.co.uk/practice-areas/family/news_and_comment/re-b-and-g-children-no-2-2015-ewfc-3#.VLdwzd6kJC8 [60] It can readily be seen that although FGM of WHO Types I, II and III are all very much more invasive than male circumcision, at least some forms of Type IV, for example, pricking, piercing and incising, are on any view …
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:02 AM
1

Part Two: "Making Baby Comfortable". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfadQibv_Mo#t=120
/r/MensRights14/01/15 01:44 AM
1

Thanks. There are so many good Redditors who can deconstruct stuff so well!
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:11 PM
4

Bizarre article. Female writer is dismissive of the research, because she knows all too well that mothers push for their sons to suffer MGM — and God forbid this could be "bad" for the little boys. She thinks that science and research that does not produce the results she likes is "not helpful" and "harmful" — rather than what it is, which is just neutral and factual (hopefully). But the icing on the cake is she whines "What about the girls?". The cognitive dissonance is amazing to behold; she d…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 01:39 PM
0

Imo, this is irrelevant to this subreddit I guess, my point is, that these (mainly) women are saying that abortion is murder, but then they want to let the "murderer" off.
/r/PussyPass13/01/15 01:06 AM
2

The "Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)" translated and originally posted this video. The "institute" was co-founded in 1998 by Yigal Carmon, a former Israeli military intelligence officer and Meyrav Wurmser, an Israeli-born American political scientist. MEMRI is a pro-Israel propaganda organisation, that "aims to portray the Arab and Muslim world in a negative light, through the production and dissemination of inaccurate translations and by selectively translating views of extremists …
/r/MensRights12/01/15 08:29 PM
1

Yes, spot on. Older gay man marries young man: It must be love and devotion. Older straight man marries young girl: He doing it to make himself feel better and show-off to his friends.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:00 AM
2

It not the circumcision as such; but rather the pain that they think causes autism.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 09:16 PM
3

Julia was excellent. Well balanced and spoke her mind. But the really interesting person is a woman at 37:00 who makes the point that why is it OK for Chad Evans to go and now work as a shelf-stacker in Sainsburys, and for "ordinary" working people to have to work with him? e.g.: if you are on a low wage, then congratulations, you get to work with rapists. What job exactly is it now "OK" for him to do? The other issue, is WHY is it that "footballers" are a "role model" for men? Is this right? Wh…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:18 PM
2

So if you aren't trying to equate male and female circumcision, stop bringing up female circumcision as if that somehow credits or discredits the male circumcision. It's fallacious to do so. Still trying to play the "which is worse" game eh? Hours of fun. I said that in that particular case, clearly, MGM is worse than FGM. So not even "equal" as in "equate". I will no longer be responding to you as you have proved that you are not willing to discuss in good faith. Sounds like your parents sexual…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 11:42 PM
2

Well at least you watched them! Here's another video of an infant boy screaming as his penis is being mutilated. But hey! No big deal eh? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQLeWxG9IOM
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:33 PM
5

People really need to stop comparing male female circumcision. You mean YOU want to stop comparing because it makes you start to experience your cognitive dissonance; and that makes you very uncomfortable. Males and females are not the same Well spotted Einstein. and the procedures are not the same. Hacking off bits of female or male genitalia are depressingly similar.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:30 PM
2

I stopped reading after the beginning er… you supposed to stop reading after the end LOL All of your comments attempt to equate male and female circumcision Nope. In this particular case, the MGM is far worse than the FGM — not that child sex multination is a game of "which is worse". all of your comments seem to use videos and photographs as emotional arguments. Yes. Sexually abusing infants makes me emotional. Sorry about that. You don't care — we get that.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:28 PM
3

When talking about male circumcision I completely ignore anything about female circumcision. I see them as completely different. Oh dear... Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or do…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:27 PM
2

When talking about male circumcision I completely ignore anything about female circumcision. I see them as completely different. FGM has "health benefits" just like MGM; and, according to "research" it does not always damage a female's sexual response: Note: I am against ALL genital mutilation of females, males and intersex. Please don't interpret this post as supporting any of these activities. Everything I have posted below is factual; but it's supposed to be educational - to help folks clear …
/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:26 PM
3

When talking about male circumcision I completely ignore anything about female circumcision. I see them as completely different. Well, you are appallingly naive. You need to start doing research, and not just taking what the mass-media tells you at face value. Can someone tell me the difference between these two?? NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African genital mutilation being performed on an unconsenting young girl: http://www.medicalvideos.org/play.php?vid=1835 NSFL: Warning! Extrem…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:24 PM
2

I must be f**king dreaming.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:46 AM
41

NEVER talk to the police. EVERYONE should watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
/r/MensRights31/12/14 10:29 PM
32

So a push to train women as engineers and "project managers". But they're not exactly queuing-up to be bricklayers & plumbers; let alone digging up roads.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:50 PM
-1

I don't like the way the interviewer is laughing about this.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:26 AM
8

Hmmm… I wonder if the women passengers can then specify a non "Asian" [code-word for "Muslim"] driver, as so many "Asian" cab drivers have been linked to massive child sexual exploitation scandals in the UK: http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/birmingham-city-council-hid-links-8131813
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:01 PM
10

From the UK stats of child killings: http://www.dewar4research.org/docs/chom.pdf Boy are slightly more at risk then girls Biological fathers are responsible for about 55% of murders of their own offspring and biological mothers about 45% Mothers are responsible for the majority of infant deaths "Male parents who kill their children are generally treated more harshly and unsympathetically by the legal process than female parents: fathers are more likely than mothers to be charged with murder than…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 11:14 PM
19

Many thanks for those stats. I was wrong. Apologies. I've corrected my post above.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 08:24 PM
99

White women kill children: they are mentally ill. "Indigenous" women kill children: they are victims of racism, "gender inequality" and poverty. Men kill children: they are the "perpetrator" and no attempt is made to understand their motivation and help them. EDIT: Who kills most children and partners? It's true it's men. [EDIT: I'm wrong. Please see stats post below] So if you are really concerned about protecting women and children from violence; then you need to be primarily focused on men an…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:25 PM
24

Women featured in the article - Jaha Dukureh - supports the genital mutilation of infant boys. She has at least one son, and it's almost 100% likely she subjected him to genital mutilation: http://risingupagainstfgm.org/author/jaha "A lot people ask me why I am so against female circumcision and not male circumcision. Well I can sit here and write all my reasons, but I’ll just give you a few. Male circumcision does not affect male arousal, yet female circumcision is done to take away that sense …
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:35 PM
10

Yes. You are spot-on. That is the real under-lying reason. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:17 PM
24

The Guardian says: "...although the two issues are superficially related the effects and cultural practices/significance are very, very different, and essentially they're two separate debates" Hmm…. let's take a look shall we? NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African genital mutilation being performed on an unconsenting young girl: http://www.medicalvideos.org/play.php?vid=1835 NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting youn…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 06:03 PM
2

totally fine with circumcisions. Sure LOL: The Fox Who had Lost his Tail It happened that a Fox caught its tail in a trap, and in struggling to release himself lost all of it but the stump. At first he was ashamed to show himself among his fellow foxes. But at last he determined to put a bolder face upon his misfortune, and summoned all the foxes to a general meeting to consider a proposal which he had to place before them. When they had assembled together the Fox proposed that they should all d…
/r/MensRights16/12/14 12:30 AM
2

Nice try. Wrong again. Hacking off parts of babies genitals is not standard medical practice in most of the world by far. And large parts of the world (Africa, Middle East) that do circumcise; don't do it for "medical" reasons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Global_Map_of_Male_Circumcision_Prevalence_at_Country_Level.png
/r/MensRights16/12/14 12:25 AM
2

But strangely it uses the same argument. er… no it doesn't. One involves hacking off a large part of the male genitals with minor medical "benefit"; and this bizarre practice is limited to a small number of doctors and medical organisations worldwide. The other involves a small prick in the arm that activate an immune reaction in the body; offering almost total protection against a number of life-threatening diseases. A practice which is universal amongst all doctors and medical organisations wo…
/r/MensRights16/12/14 12:18 AM
3

Nice try. Hacking-off what will become 15" inches of adult male mucus-membrane, with 25,000 nerve endings and the most sensitive nerves of the penis in order to gain some minor health advantages is not the same as getting a polio shot. Male circumcision is not benefit vs risk; it's benefit vs harm.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:59 PM
3

I stand with the cdc. Oh dear oh dear… The CDC have based their "recommendations" on The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)The AAP & Male Circumcision: The American Academy of Pediatrics is a trade organisation, and exists for the promotion of its members - pediatric doctors. eg: to arrange the "evidence" so their members make as much money as possible. It is not, and never will be, a patient advocacy group. The AAP members make millions of dollars from circumcision infant baby boys, and milli…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:35 PM
1

I guess we need to know if the women is hot or not? ;-)
/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:00 PM
10

Try these questions as well - seriously: Black man with black child Black man with white child White man with black child White man with white child White man alone Black man alone Two white female 16 year old children - no parent Two black female 16 year old children - no parent Two white male 16 year old children - no parent Two black male 16 year old children - no parent etc. etc. Hours of fun!
/r/MensRights15/12/14 02:38 PM
26

Wow. Imagine this was titled: "Jennifer Lawrence's clitoris is finally getting the attention it deserves. Nice work Jennifer Lawrence's clitoris. Really nice work". And you had a slow-mo clip of her swinging her legs out of bed, and you can just catch a glimpse of her clitoris - playing over and over again. Twitter would be silent. Facebook would be mute. Tumblr would have nothing to say. The feminist blogs would take a day off. NOT!.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 12:42 AM
1

Here you go... Female Circumcision & Health Benefits "Stallings et al. (2005) reported that, in Tanzanian women, the risk of HIV among women who had undergone FGC was roughly half that of women who had not; the association remained significant after adjusting for region, household wealth, age, lifetime partners, union status, and recent ulcer." Note: when it's found that circumcising female genitals reduces HIV/AIDS it's called a "conundrum" rather that a wonderfully exciting "medical" opportuni…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 10:58 PM
2

Ha ha! Amazing. So much wisdom concentrated in just 3 paragraphs. It's that simple. Too much pondering, thinking, wondering, and reading "self-help" books about it is just Blue Pill.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 08:07 PM
5

Amazing how they use a staged photograph of domestic violence as a joke to illustrate the article. But because it's a woman punching a man; that's OK then.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:05 AM
2

Spot on. I felt the same way. And evolutionary theory explains this behaviour.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:14 PM
2

You are welcome. Here are some good videos/sites that show how male circumcision can be every bit as bad as the very worse female circumcision. i.e.: Death and Amputation of the Penis This is what happens when the "traditional" circumcisers take their knives to boys' and young mens' penises: 500 young men have died in just one province of South Africa since 2006. How many thousands die worldwide each year? http://www.cbsnews.com/news/in-south-africa-circumcision-ritual-becomes-health-crisis/ NSF…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:48 AM
2

No problem. As it's Christmas soon and I like you, here is a link to an archived page of the original :-)) https://web.archive.org/web/20130307104149/http://aandes.blogspot.com/2010/04/circumcision.html
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:31 AM
6

Ask your boyfriend if he would be OK with you having your little baby girl "circumcised"? Because often, this is a lot less damage then male circumcision: Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used b…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:00 PM
3

I think you should be more worried about the grammatical concept.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:51 PM
3

Great post. Thanks. Spot On.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:22 PM
5

Hamstering™ is a Registered Trade mark of /u/walkonthebeach. Please don't use it in your posts or comments without permission, or you will hear from my lawyer :-) EDIT: Added a smiley.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 03:51 PM
3

Yes! I was feeling the chill myself as I read it. I like this bit: "I'm sorry we were popular in high school! Can you stop accusing us of rape now?" And this is exactly what I was thinking — to donate to survivors of false rape accusations: "In penance for publishing a book that falsely accused Oberlin's Barry of rape, Random House offered to pay his legal fees, suggesting that his law firm 'donate all of the crowd-funding raised (to sue Random House) to not-for-profit organizations assisting su…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:15 PM
9

The Hampstering begins…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:00 PM
2

Just a "quick snip" eh?... 1: Women prefer intact penises. Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html http://www.livescience.com/1624-study-circumcision-removes-sensitive-parts.html 4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, there is no change to lasting longer during…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:27 PM
1

The CDC have based their "recommendations" on The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Oh dear oh dear... The AAP & Male Circumcision: The American Academy of Pediatrics is a trade organisation, and exists for the promotion of its members - pediatric doctors. eg: to arrange the "evidence" so their members make as much money as possible. It is not, and never will be, a patient advocacy group. The AAP members make millions of dollars from circumcision infant baby boys, and millions more from selli…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:58 AM
2

This guy is an "expert": Watch this evil Mohel showing and boasting about the “instruments” he uses to torture and mutilate little Jewish boys. Or as he calls it: ”tickling” them. Evil child abusing Mohel Here he states quite clearly that the purpose of him mutilating little boys’ genitals is to damage their sexuality: Mutilate infants to damage their sexuality
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:58 AM
2

1: Women prefer intact penises. Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html http://www.livescience.com/1624-study-circumcision-removes-sensitive-parts.html 4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, there is no change to lasting longer during sex. Source: http://online…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:48 PM
6

doing circs for kids made sense to me Nice work... Modern medical & scientific research is starting to unravel the amazing properties and functions of the foreskin. If you are interested in this subject, do take the time to watch the amazing video below. According to a number of leading researchers and scientists - including Ken McGrath, Senior Lecturer in Pathology at the Faculty of Health, Auckland University of Technology: "neurologically speaking, removal of the male foreskin is as destructi…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:47 PM
4

This story is from the Daily Mail, a UK newspaper that is sensationalist to say the least. But the guy's story is very interesting; especially how the police would not listen to him.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 12:05 AM
1

Thanks bsutansalt. I think the very best examples of TRP relevance don't need a commentary; they are just self-evident. I think this is one of those; and you can tell by looking at the comments that it was engaging TRP subscribers who were doing a very good job of analysing it and explaining how it expresses a number of facets of TRP mentality. And it was racing to the top of the list. To be honest, I just can't think of any commentary to add to it that would be more helpful than the title itsel…
/r/TheRedPill24/11/14 12:34 AM
17

Good point. Either way, she is selling the dream of RP to her readers.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/14 04:03 PM
6

Click here to see the RP truth in all its glory: Google: covers of romantic books
/r/TheRedPill23/11/14 03:36 PM
7

"Detective Inspector Damian Simpson said: “Unfortunately we’ve dealt with many an incident whereby two young people have met on an alcohol-fuelled night out, one thing has led to another and the next morning we’re arresting somebody for rape." Well if they are both drunk; then shouldn't they both be arrested?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 10:57 PM
5

"The trouble is, being a man – in the old-fashioned sense – is deeply unfashionable, naff almost, these days." "At some point this century, bombarded by an agonizingly right-on, feminist, PC doctrine through the liberal media, many men decided it was time to stop being men and embrace their inner sister." "But as we lost our rough edges and took on more of what had traditionally been regarded as female roles, no one really stopped to question whether equality for women came with a cost for mascu…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:34 PM
4

FGM, when performed, is done in largely medieval conditions and is associated with high rates of infection as well as true horrors like fistulas Nope. Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a …
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:17 AM
6

In terms of severity, there really is no contest. Oh dear... This is what happens when the "traditional" circumcisers take their knives to boys' and young mens' penises: 500 young men have died in just one province of South Africa since 2006. How many thousands die worldwide each year? http://www.cbsnews.com/news/in-south-africa-circumcision-ritual-becomes-health-crisis/ NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://y…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:16 AM
3

You are just a child sex-abuser of the worst kind. Simple as that. I assume you are in favour of being allowed to slice of bits of your daughter's genitals as well?
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:38 PM
1

a flap of skin Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor in a modern hospital to shave off a tiny bit of flesh from the mound on the prepuce of the clitoris. ie: just a tiny, ti…
/r/MensRights17/10/14 12:04 PM
1

If someone cuts a large part of your penis off, and you lose 22,000 nerve ending, you don't need "context" to call it child sex-abuse, and grievous bodily harm. Try arguing in a court that you hacked off flesh with 22,000 nerve endings from an infant girl's labia lips; but you want to argue that the "context" is relevant.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 12:03 PM
1

22k doesn't mean much... Try grabbing a little girl on the street and slicing 22k's worth of her labia lips off. Then use the "22k doesn't mean much" defence and see how the jury reacts LOL.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 05:16 PM
1

Why is it when I try to engage in a debate, its "gabbing on", exactly? Good question to ask yourself LOL!
/r/MensRights14/10/14 11:03 PM
1

there's a striking difference between cutting off a flap of skin and carving off someone's clit Not according to some modern medical researchers... Modern medical & scientific research is starting to unravel the amazing properties and functions of the foreskin. If you are interested in this subject, do take the time to watch the amazing video below. According to a number of leading researchers and scientists - including Ken McGrath, Senior Lecturer in Pathology at the Faculty of Health, Auckland…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:10 PM
1

This conversation is over. Well no it's not - you are still gabbing on eh?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:07 PM
6

I don't know enough about fgm to develop an opinion on it. Well, give us your opinion on this... Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor in a modern hospital to shave off a ti…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 07:05 PM
8

What next? Cab driven by white people so you don't have to get into a cab with a black person?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 11:43 AM
10

Circumcision reduces the risk of HIV and other infections. Same for female circumcision - so that makes it alright eh?... Note: I am against ALL genital mutilation of females, males and intersex. Please don't interpret this post as supporting any of these activities. Everything I have posted below is factual; but it's supposed to be educational - to help folks clear up their confused thinking around this issue. Thanks Genital Autonomy for all - Intersex, Male & Female If the amputation of the mu…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 08:40 PM
6

how the fuck is that a consolation to a 10-year-old girl who has had her clitoris cut off Here's how... Modern medical & scientific research is starting to unravel the amazing properties and functions of the foreskin. If you are interested in this subject, do take the time to watch the amazing video below. According to a number of leading researchers and scientists - including Ken McGrath, Senior Lecturer in Pathology at the Faculty of Health, Auckland University of Technology: "neurologically s…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 08:39 PM
4

Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor in a modern hospital to shave off a tiny bit of flesh from the mound on the prepuce of the clitoris. ie: just a tiny, tiny part is shav…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 07:21 PM
2

Douglas Diekema, a pediatrics professor at the University of Washington, who was part of the American Academy of Pediatrics Oh dear oh dear... The AAP & Male Circumcision: The American Academy of Pediatrics is a trade organisation, and exists for the promotion of its members - pediatric doctors. eg: to arrange the "evidence" so their members make as much money as possible. It is not, and never will be, a patient advocacy group. The AAP members make millions of dollars from circumcision (mutilati…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 07:31 PM
3

What makes you think that the foreskin is purely for pleasure? Ask yourself this question: The foreskin evolved on the human male, because it gave the male a better chance of successful reproduction, and a better chance of those offspring reaching sexually maturity. That IS evolution, and is the reason that every organ of your body is the way it is. So how does the foreskin help achieve that? What are its many functions? What are the function of the glans of the penis that the foreskin protects?…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 03:11 PM
1

my obstetrician believes exposing the head more is probably actually more pleasurable Wrong. Modern medical & scientific research is starting to unravel the amazing properties and functions of the foreskin. If you are interested in this subject, do take the time to watch the amazing video below. According to a number of leading researchers and scientists - including Ken McGrath, Senior Lecturer in Pathology at the Faculty of Health, Auckland University of Technology: "neurologically speaking, re…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 03:07 PM
28

Amazing picture. Thanks. It's just says all I need to know!
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 11:57 AM
1

you're insane if you think all but the most minor female circumcision practices aren't worse than the routine male circumcision. To deny that just makes you look silly. Take a careful read of this, and see if you feel "silly"... Modern medical & scientific research is starting to unravel the amazing properties and functions of the foreskin. If you are interested in this subject, do take the time to watch the amazing video below. According to a number of leading researchers and scientists - inclu…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:55 PM
0

Hmm.... Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor in a modern hospital to shave off a tiny bit of flesh from the mound on the prepuce of the clitoris. ie: just a tiny, tiny part…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:54 PM
3

It's interesting to note that the Guardian readership is plummeting, and they are struggling financially; and 50% of their readers are men. Perhaps they are finally starting to come round to the idea that if you keep demeaning and attacking 50% of our readership, it doesn't help your bottom line very much. So this Kelly Brook article is a bit of a change of heart perhaps. http://media.info/newspapers/titles/the-guardian/readership-figures
/r/MensRights12/09/14 11:06 PM
11

Comparing it to female mutilation... Well, let's do just that: Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor in a modern hospital to shave off a tiny bit of flesh from the mound on …
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:58 PM
2

He cops-out in the end. No balls, never mind about not foreskin.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:12 PM
3

A German court ruled it was illegal, and that was overturned by a new law the German government issued, because they were so frightened of the backlash from the Jewish community. German politicians intimated that they agreed it should be illegal, but didn't want to be the first ones to ban it given their "history". I don't think there are any others anywhere. But I have not looked into it too much.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:37 PM
2

Its a rather cruel practice that makes sex painful. More GREAT NEWS! Medical research has shown that FGM does not reduce sexual experience, and women continue to enjoy sex and have orgasms! I KNOW you're getting excited /u/Pardonme23! Time to get your knife out and strap those little girls down so you can start slicing eh?? Female Circumcision Does Not Reduce Sexual Experiences "International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown: Female genital…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:48 AM
4

You can hear her talk about it here. She understands the human rights aspect very well: http://www.voazimbabwe.com/audio/2432783.html
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:29 AM
2

The male one is good, because it has a 40% less chance of transmitting HIV. therefore it saves lives. GREAT NEWS /u/Pardonme23 - female circumcision has also been show to reduce HIV/AIDs infection by 50 to 60% in women!! WOW! Aren't you excited?? That why we need female circumcision NOW!! Now you can have fun slicing off bits of infant girls' labia lips to add to your "hobby" of abusing infant boys. Bet you can't wait eh? Female Circumcision & Health Benefits "Stallings et al. (2005) reported th…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:27 AM
2

FGM is very very different than male circumcision. Don'r try and realte or group the two. Hmmmm... you are spot on. Male circumcision is often far worse then FGM: Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel i…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:00 AM
22

The documentary was directed by two women! And the article below (seems) to say that that is what is annoying the feminists the most. "Best of all is that "Deleting Dad" is directed by two women: Ginger Gentile and Sandra Fernandez Ferreira. And I think that's what hurts most." http://rouge.perfil.com/2014-08-29-51789-borrando-a-papa-cuando-la-violencia-de-genero-termina-en-censura/[
/r/MensRights31/08/14 12:51 AM
6

You are so right. I visited Sweden for a holiday, and there, only 1 in 17,000 men has their foreskin amputated at birth. As you walk down the street, you will hear men moaning and screaming in agony as their infected foreskins drip blood and puss. And the hospitals are full of dying men. Everywhere you go, you can smell the rotting penis flesh. All the women have become lesbians because it's almost impossible to have sex with a man as their penises are all falling off. Even the uncircumcised ani…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:38 AM
11

Full text here if you can't access the premium site: Is this the generation that rejects circumcision? There is no Jewish death penalty. There are no rabbinic executioners, or people who amputate limbs for violations of Jewish law. Ritual circumcision is the only act of physical harm that remains. By Avraham Burg A debate has come into being quietly here about the place of Brit Milah (the ritual circumcision of Jewish baby boys on the eighth day after birth). The debate is not taking place abroa…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:35 PM
3

The reason that girls "like it", is because they live in a culture where men with mutilated penis are considered "normal". If you lived in Egypt or Somalia for instance, you would prefer girls with amputated clitorises and labia lips. And the girls would be posting: "Personally, I'm glad my parents had me circumcised as a baby".
/r/MensRights27/08/14 05:01 PM
3

WOW! You signed a consent form at just one day old. You must be a genius or something.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 12:32 AM
2

Oh dear oh dear oh dear... You are posting links to site run by Brian J. Morris - a circumcision fetishist who has close links with convicted peodaphiles: Peodaphile is closely linked to "Brian J Morris" - a circumcision obsessive, who published medical "research" into the "benefits" of male genital mutilation. Crazy Man: Brian Morris Brian Morris and the Gilgal Society Gilgal Society's Vernon Quaintance is a child abusing peodaphile
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:25 PM
3

I would put the view forward, that you will never win on the "facts": All the pro-circ crowd needs is for there to be some measure of "debate" and "uncertainty" about the "facts", and then they can claim (like the AAP), that the decision is "difficult" and "best left to the parents". So they welcome debate. To me, it's very simple: would you allow parents to amputate any part of their infant female's genitals in order to gain the same "pros" that male genital mutilation claims to achieve? The si…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:20 PM
3

I need every pro and con available. I would like to put the argument to you that you are starting with a false premise. There are no "pro" arguments to sexually abusing a newborn infant by mutilating his penis. It really is as simple as that. Try this test: What are the "pro" arguments to amputating a newborn baby's ears? What are the "pro" arguments to amputating a newborn baby's toes? What are the "pro" arguments to amputating a newborn baby's eyelids? What are the "pro" arguments to amputatin…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 12:02 PM
16

I think the best way would be to actually work off prompts - or pretend to be! That way it does not seem personal in any way. Indeed, if you are obliged to ask that question, then you are working off prompts. But I'm not sure what the ethics are. I'm assuming that in London, UK, there is a drive against domestic violence, and so they have added that question into a standard clinical questionnaire. And I would also assume that other factors have to be considered - does the patient seem OK? Do the…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 10:28 PM
2

I've added a /sarcasm tag! I meant that he's circumcised, and insecure about that.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 06:21 PM
5

Yes. You are spot on. I must remember that. Thank you. I have indeed recently stared to use the phrase "Child Genital Mutilation" - CGM - on Reddit and elsewhere. I should stick with that.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 05:44 PM
2

FYI - I used to post to the comments section on articles about FGM in the Guardian. But ALL comments that even hinted at MGM were deleted without fail for months. So now, for a few weeks, I hit the "report" button and posted a "Hate Speech" alert such as: ALERT! Guardian Censor Drones ALERT! Comment about male circumcision detected in article about FGM. ALL MEN ARE TO BE SEXUALLY MUTILATED Delete! Delete! Delete! I have to say, that recently, such mentions of MGM have been allowed to stand; and …
/r/MensRights10/08/14 05:03 PM
1

We're usually the loudest about things that make us insecure. Indeed, indeed. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:48 PM
2

I just gave you an upvote :-) The fight against MGM is 95% education. Thanks for reading - whatever your views.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:47 PM
5

Many men who have suffered male genital mutilation [MGM] (AKA "circumcision") are not aware of the damage that has been done to them. This is the same for most women who have suffered FGM, they think it's normal, and they too have good and satisfying sex lives. And of course they will say that "men love it". But the truth is, that you have lost around 15 square inches of highly erogenous tissue, with around 20,000 nerve endings that has multiple functions. And did you know that the glans of the …
/r/MensRights10/08/14 02:01 PM
2

Book Description Circumcision of male infants and boys is a cultural practice that persists within some African, Pacific, Southern Asian and Middle Eastern cultures, and, as a medicalized ritual, in some Anglophone societies, especially the United States. Advocates describe circumcision as a benign snip with religious significance and health benefits. Critics argue that the health benefits are trivial, irrelevant or non-existent, and that parental power over a child's upbringing does not extend …
/r/MensRights09/08/14 08:53 PM
2

Done. Thanks!
/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:46 AM
3

Amazing video. Spot on. Should be viewed by everyone.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:32 AM
2

You don't seem to understand that circumcision is a tradition that goes back hundreds of years in many West African countries. er... yes I do. There are lots of "traditions" around the world - live slavery, gays being executed, women being raped with impunity, Jews being persecuted, cannibalism, binding of girls' feet in Japan etc. So what? people WILL have this procedure done whether you like it or not. Nope. We can change peoples' minds and behaviour to stop this barbaric practice. Female circ…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:38 PM
4

Answer my question: do you also believe in female genital mutilation as a "health benefit?". That also is a "deeply rooted tradition". Time for you to learn some basic biology: The male foreskin has FIVE layers of highly erogenous tissue "The foreskin is not “skin.” A look at a section of foreskin tissue under the microscope shows us its make-up. This science, called histology, outlines the five layers of this highly erogenous tissue. On the outside are two layers resembling skin, epithelium cov…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 10:22 PM
9

What other parts of the human body are you going to amputate to reduce the chance of future illnesses?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:04 PM
9

One of the main problems, is that you come from a country and a culture where male genital mutilation [MGM] has become normalized. Namely the USA, where some 70% of males have mutilated penises, although the numbers are declining as parents discover for themselves the terrible damage that the forceable amputation of the foreskins of infants causes. You are most likely under the illusion that the foreskin is just a "bit of excess skin" and it has no functions. This is the lie that is spread by th…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:02 PM
14

Thanks. Just to be clear: you agree that female genital mutilation or "female circumcision" should be provided in modern clinics by western trained doctors. Is that correct?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:43 PM
11

And the same goes for FGM - that's why it needs to be provided in clinics by western trained doctors. Thanks.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:31 PM
9

why not provide the service in a safer environment where there is less of a chance of medical complications? Indeed. And girls & women are also getting circumcised - so time to get them to "safer" environments as well: Several types of research have documented that Male Female circumcision significantly reduces the risk of men women contracting HIV through penile-vaginal sex.: *Female Circumcision & Health Benefits** "Stallings et al. (2005) reported that, in Tanzanian women, the risk of HIV amo…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:02 PM
25

Before circumcision: need to wear a condom 100% of the time. After having your penis seriously mutilated by a hypocritical western doctor: need to wear a condom 100% of the time. I think I'll go for option A. Hard choice though.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:36 PM
46

Prince "I think circumcision is good for those who want to do it, but personally I wouldn’t want to do it because I was created in this way, so why should I remove my foreskin? And those who are circumcising people, they are not even circumcised but they are just preaching the message that we want to circumcise people..." "Actually I had an encounter with this doctor who is actually chopping other people’s foreskins and I asked him, ‘Are you circumcised yourself’ and he said ‘No, and I don't eve…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:27 PM
5

And here you are circle jerking with us all on a circumcision thread LOL. Still, as a wise man once said: "Best strategy is just to avoid circumcision threads..."
/r/MensRights04/08/14 10:51 PM
1

I'll have to copy this. I don't understand it — but it's the most wonderful put-down I've ever read :-)
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:22 PM
5

but I'm consenting to it now er... you can't retrospectively consent to irreversibly having your foreskin amputated when you were an infant LOL I don't want to start a comment war What on earth are you on Reddit for then? And discussing male circumcision at that!
/r/MensRights04/08/14 04:48 PM
2

No problems! It's amazing you were able to sign the consent form when you were just 2 days old. You must be some sort of genius! Respect.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 04:10 PM
7

Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation" and "child sex abuse"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor in a modern hospital to shave off a tiny bit of flesh from the mound on the prepuce of the clitoris. ie: just a tiny, tiny part is shav…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:12 PM
9

Child sex-abuse is a pretty big issue. But as I said, you seem to downplay that. Which is a bit suspicious I must say.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:06 PM
4

1 in every 20 skin cancers develop on the ear. Time to get chopping those little kids' ears off LOL: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-help/about-cancer/cancer-questions/treatment-for-cancer-of-the-outer-ear
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:54 PM
6

I'd still rather not have them, I understand women get them all the time, and my mother has been hospitilized for them, It also causes kidney damage. Females have 10 times the rate of UTIs as men. So you agree with female circumcision to reduce UTIs do you?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:51 PM
7

I don't have a problem with that either - because they are consenting adults. It's the sexual abuse of unconsenting infants that bother us here - not that you seem to care about that.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:47 PM
0

You may feel fine about it for yourself, and that's OK. And don't start to feel bad about it just because other men are deeply angry that they had their foreskins amputated without their consent. But that is not what this is really all about: it's about the forced genital mutilation of unconsenting male infants. That needs to stop, and it's that that make many people, male and female, cut and uncut, deeply angry. Then, once men have reached the age of 18, they can decide if they want to have the…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:30 AM
11

Oh yeah - black people - who cares eh? /s
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:49 AM
20

more women report orgasm and are generally more satisfied. Here's just one such study: Conclusions: Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/06/13/ije.dyr104.abstract
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:34 AM
48

This is what happens when the "traditional" circumcisers take their knives to boys' and young mens' penises: 500 young men have died in just one province of South Africa since 2006. How many thousands die worldwide each year? http://www.cbsnews.com/news/in-south-africa-circumcision-ritual-becomes-health-crisis/ NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://youtu.be/WPthgNqG1YY?t=2m20s NSFL: Warning! Horrific photo col…
/r/MensRights03/08/14 11:56 PM
3

Thanks /u/dalkon, excellent, factual and informative post as always. Do you have any info on the real-world predicted decrease in HIV/AIDS of "60%" where VMCC has been performed on a large population in Africa? Surprise, surprise - I just can't seem to find that anywhere! Thanks.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 06:12 PM
3

Where is the hard, specific, real-world data that circumcision reduces HIV/AIDS? It's all very well going on about research studies, and the fact that HIV/AIDS has decreased worldwide. But where are the studies that show the magical "60%" reduction in HIV/AIDS amongst men who have been circumcised as part of this massive "health" exercise? Anyone?
/r/MensRights03/08/14 06:09 PM
2

Excellent points, thank you. There is some good news in all this. The Guardian is slowly starting to shift on the FGM/MGM angle. It used to be, that any mention of MGM in an article about FGM was rigorously censored - the comments would be littered with gaps and the notice: "Comment removed etc..". But in this article about FGM, almost all of the comments are about MGM and they have been allowed to stand (thanks!). In addition, a Guardian staff member posted to say that: "Thanks for your comment…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:26 PM
0

You'll be safe on Reddit as long as you never go to /r/spacedicks D o n o t e v e n t h i n k a b o u t i t .
/r/MensRights31/07/14 04:03 PM
1

You're welcome! Now you know what the internet is for.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:52 PM
3

The comments were excellent indeed, and the article bizarre and ridiculous. The only slight downer is that the article was so tucked-away on the Telegraph website, that I suspect the only folks that found it were those who regularly search Google for "circumcision" articles! And that is mainly people who are very anti-MGM such as myself. Still, it was good to see, and provides plenty of ammo and practice for more prominent articles.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:33 AM
5

Is that what that's for? No - is for stopping one's porn viewing showing in one's history LOL. But it also gets you around some paywalls as a bonus :-))
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:28 AM
2

Thanks for that - yep, just looked him up. Interesting guy. And thanks for the heads-up about the pay wall; I guess I soon use up my 20 articles a month!
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:31 PM
4

Amazingly spot-on article in so many respects! His remarks on feminism, FGM and Lynne Featherstone MP are remarkably accurate.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:17 PM
6

FULL ARTICLE TEXT: Please tick Yes or No in answer to each of the following questions: 1) Does this procedure involve primitive surgery on the genitals of infants? 2) Is it inflicted on babies who cannot, per se, have any voice in determining what is being done to their bodies? 3) Is this procedure traditionally inflicted as a tribal marking? 4) Is it justified by its practitioners on specious, bogus grounds of hygiene? Related Articles 5) Is this procedure customarily conducted by people with n…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:15 PM
3

Good to hear that! There is lots of research evidence that male genital mutilation damages the female sexual response: Conclusions: "Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male circumcision is more common is warranted." http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/e…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:21 PM
2

Many thanks for telling your story. It's just amazing the power that society has to "normalize" so many terrible things - including serious mutilation of the human body. So much so that you actually felt shame. Glad to hear you pulled through it all and now realize how lucky you are! Keep-up the good work introducing the ladies to the wonders of an intact penis :-)
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:51 PM
15

Very good and positive piece. Interviewer was clearly very sympathetic and knowledgeable. Plus they didn't feel the need to "balance" the discussion by having some crazy pro-circ nut spouting the usual nonsense. The pain and anger these men felt was tangible. I would like to thank them for being brave enough to speak out.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:46 PM
3

I do understand your point, and I appreciate what you are saying and I agree with it. I don't think I was clear enough - please excuse me. My point, is that Metzitzah - the act of sucking the bleeding penis - is nothing compared to the act of mutilation of the penis with a knife. And that mutilation, or the right to do it to an infant, is supported by the majority of Jews worldwide. So some of the comments you see posted here, are not just against the sucking of the mutilated, bleeding penis (wh…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:02 AM
5

Some of the comments would indeed be classed as anti-semitic and I condemn them. An anti-semitic comment would be one that exhibits an irrational and unfounded hatred or dislike of Jews; and/or unfairly groups all Jews together. But I don't think that specifically criticising Jewish people as a whole because the vast majority of them support the forced amputation of infants' foreskins is anti-semitic. But I think one would have to be clear that one is quite specifically criticising them for that…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 10:50 PM
6

Great news that you are questioning this - that's what real Judaism is all about. Please take a look at this excellent website: http://www.beyondthebris.com/ You can still have a beautiful naming ceremony to bring your son into the word - it's called a Brit Shalom. You can also connect with thousands of other Jewish parents who have elected to leave their sons as nature/God intended.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 10:40 PM
1

Yes - sorry, my title is not very clear. But at least it would have some effect on the wider population.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:43 AM
2

Oh dear... bringing up the subject of FGM in a post about MGM - go to the back of the class! /s
/r/MensRights25/07/14 07:19 PM
5

I like the way the penis lolly-pops have foreskins... but that's just me :-)
/r/MensRights25/07/14 07:17 PM
7

it's completely different to women's circumcision ANYWHERE. Nope. Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor in a modern hospital to shave off a tiny bit of flesh from the mound on the prepuce of the …
/r/MensRights25/07/14 03:03 PM
17

Don't forget to watch the results of all this! NSFL: Warning! Horrific photo collection from a Dutch doctor of hundreds of mutilated, amputated and seriously infected penises (many with gangrene) of African boys and men as a result of "male circumcision" - ie: sexual abuse and genital mutilation. This is just one, tiny area of Africa - where MGM is widespread. http://www.ulwaluko.co.za/Photos.html
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:25 AM
1

Interesting that's it's a woman who is performing this unethical and evil practice of bribing what are most likely uneducated men. Her education has given her a good taste of the culture of MGM in the USA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawango_Agot
/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:53 PM
1

Even if you are HIV positive in Africa - they will still offer you circumcision! This is because they are so desperate to normalise it. I'm still trying to find the reference I had to that.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:49 PM
6

Good point. I will not mind it being marketed to adults, once it's outlawed against infants and children. Just like I don't mind adult females having their inner labia lips partially amputated, their clitorises reduced in size by having them pushed back into the body, or bags of silicone being shoved into their breasts. But you can't do any of that to a female infant or child.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:18 PM
3

True. But the problem is, that they start by marketing it to adults - but that is just a Trojan Horse. Before you know it, they are "recommending" it for newborn infants. Just like what is happening in Africa with VMC "voluntary" male circumcision. Now it is morphing into - "best to circumcise the boys when they are young so they can't object".
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:11 PM
4

There are 5 different sizes, and one of them looks pretty small. Not sure.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 08:53 PM
2

Also the research seems very biased Look no further: http://www.plosone.org/article/authors/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030198 3 of the authors are from STD/AIDS organizations or universities and have most likely swallowed the "male circumcision reduces HIV/AIDs" angle hook, line and sinker. Perhaps they are even in receipt of grants from WHO or the UN etc to "promote" this "treatment". Maybe even Bill Gates and his Mrs have sent them a cheque. Then there is this guy: Abu S. Abdullah De…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 06:16 PM
6

Frightening that this bizarre body mutilation fetish is starting to catch-on in China. According to this survey, 45% of Chinese men would accept male "circumcision" for one of the following reasons: Promotion of female partners' hygiene (60.3%) What? The male penis makes the female vagina dirty? Redundant foreskin (59.4%) 3.5 billion years of evolution has made a major part of the human male reproductive organ redundant? Prevention of penile cancer (50.2%) Tiny reduction in chance of penile canc…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 05:32 PM
2

Bizzare. I'm mean it's sexual assault. If I was in the wrong mood, and I saw this video with her assaulting me, and might well take it to the police and register a complaint. Can you imagine what would happen if a guy went around doing this to girls (in somewhere like the USA); filmed it; and put it on the internet??? P
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:06 PM
6

More info here: Crazy Man: Brian Morris Brian Morris and the Gilgal Society Gilgal Society's Vernon Quaintance is a child abusing peodaphile
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:55 PM
1

It was the Rabbi who mentioned him, not me... honest guv.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:07 PM
1

As long as he's also having a go at doctors, muslims, Oprah, politicians, circumfetishists etc then there really shouldn't be an issue. Correct. But the jewish groups pushing MGM will use the anti-semitic angle given any chance. Even the "Hitler all-over-again" angle: “I have said that a country which saved the Jews during the Second World War, if they would establish any law against circumcision, they would have done what Hitler wanted to do,” said Rabbi Bent Lexner, chief rabbi to Denmark’s Je…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:04 PM
4

This comic was not a very smart move. In this edition, he lampoons Jewish Rabbis & Mohels: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mgmbill/6495320825/in/set-72157628378704349 Thus this gave huge leverage to those Jews who are in favour of MGM and are terrified that male "circumcision" will be banned. They were able to point to the comic characters and claim that the whole anti-circumcision movement was anti-semitic. Not true of course - but a bad tactical move.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:39 PM
1

Thanks. I'll just stay as I am.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:20 PM
2

Not much difference to ancient Rome I would think. Best to just live a good, loving life, and be kind to all. Apart from pro-circ trolls. You can kick their butt.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:48 PM
1

So now I know ;-) But I'm not sure how that helps... Is the reverse true? Does increasing testosterone in a female increase the size of her external glans clitoris? But I'm not sure how that would help either :-)
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:43 PM
10

only one grade of FGM is anatomically equivalent to MGM - specifically, clitoral hoodectomy That seems a very reasonable view, that I myself held, until I started reading the relevant medical and scientific knowledge and research into these areas. We are lucky there is so much great knowledge around: According to a number of leading researchers and scientists - including Ken McGrath, Senior Lecturer in Pathology at the Faculty of Health, Auckland University of Technology: "neurologically speakin…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 12:43 PM
1

The author is a strange creature indeed. Take a look at her bio below. In her article she quote extensively from that well-known feminist tract: The Holy Bible. And she assigns authority to it, and offers it up as guidance! I think Mr Orwell sums her up nicely: “Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.” – George Orwell http://fsrinc.org/users/katharina-von-kellenbach Katharina von Kellenbach is Professor of Religious Studies at St. Mary’s College of Maryland. A native of We…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:43 AM
2

Agreed. Where do I sign-up?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:27 PM
35

Amazing. The US government is trying to push for the sexual abuse of European Citizens.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:45 PM
3

Your sources say nothing about the clitoral hood. As in, how many nerve endings it has. If the foreskin and the clitoral hood could possibly have the same amount of nerve endings. So what? It's not a fucking mutilation competition. Also, it's not scientific fact that the foreskin has that many nerve endings. Especially since a females 8,000 nerve endings in the clitorus is usually overwhelming and easily leads to pain rather than pleasure. Having 20,000 nerve endings seems like it would be far, …
/r/MensRights09/07/14 12:11 AM
5

understand that male circumcision is only comparable to the removal of the clitoral hood in females. You cannot and should not compare removal of the male foreskin to removal of the woman's clitoris like some people do. Removal of the clitoris is comparable to removal of the penis head of a male. That seems a very reasonable view, that I myself held, until I started reading the relevant medical and scientific knowledge and research into these areas. We are lucky there is so much great knowledge …
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:26 PM
2

Yes. And they suffer in silence, with so little recognition. Thank you.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:22 AM
10

It's the funniest thing I've read in ages. I mean the women are being manipulative, deceptive and untrustworthy - as so that's how the men see them.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 09:32 PM
7

True. But it's a step in the right direction. Another Doctor called for a ban on MGM as well, and clearly the idea is gaining traction.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:15 PM
3

Jesus F. Christ. Now I've heard everything.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:47 PM
-1

Hey! This is Reddit. You need to get in the groove man.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 06:12 PM
0

True. But imagine that he called - even in jest - for 300 Palestinian women to have their external glans clitorisis amputated!
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:36 PM
0

...of course most Palestinian men have been subject to Male Genital Mutilation anyway. But you get the point.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 10:03 AM
1

Hits the spot though eh? :-)
/r/MensRights02/07/14 12:30 PM
1

It was on the internet - Facebook even - so it must be true ;-)
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:11 PM
5

Get around paywall be using private browsing or Chrome Incognito mode. Here it is: One of the students who accused the President of the prestigious Oxford Union of rape appears to have admitted almost a year earlier that their relationship was consensual, The Daily Telegraph can reveal. Ben Sullivan, 21, was arrested on suspicion of rape and attempted rape in May after two undergraduate students accused him of forcing himself on them after nights out in January and April last year. Last week, Mr…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 11:14 PM
3

I wonder how the Guardian Newspaper would have treated the story if it was the husband who left with the au pair... And no comment about the immoral attitude of the au pair, who entered the world of a loving family on a professional basis, and then split them up by having sex with the wife. But that's OK... as they are both women, so double pussy-pass.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 08:41 PM
4

It's just bizarre that a women would want to mutilate her own son's genitals. But just shows you the depth of the normalization of this abuse. Best thing you can do is search the web for videos of mothers who have bitterly regretted their decision, and explain why, often with their sons present.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:31 PM
0

The Fox Who had Lost his Tail — AKA /u/positive- It happened that a Fox caught its tail in a trap, and in struggling to release himself lost all of it but the stump. At first he was ashamed to show himself among his fellow foxes. But at last he determined to put a bolder face upon his misfortune, and summoned all the foxes to a general meeting to consider a proposal which he had to place before them. When they had assembled together the Fox proposed that they should all do away with their tails.…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:02 PM
1

Yeah - I'm sure she loves your penis made nearly half-an-inch shorter and thinner by having it mutilated LOL. http://www.thewholenetwork.org/uploads/4/2/0/2/4202929/circ.penis.size.condom.study.pdf http://intactivistsofaustralasia.wordpress.com/2012/06/11/things-that-your-baby-boy-will-eventually-read-about-his-circumcision/
/r/MensRights27/06/14 12:45 PM
1

Oh dear, /u/dalkon again. You have your own style, and I think what you do is wonderful. I often post to say that, and your knowledge on the subject is excellent. But your claim that I am secretly trying to promote circumcision just damages your reputation, and will make folks less likely to believe or appreciate your authoritative postings. You are undermining yourself. Some people need a Zen slap, and need a wake-up call. I post as I think fit given the nature of the comments. /u/positive- is …
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:52 PM
1

They made me awesome YES! It's time to "Pick-Your-Penis" - an exclusive competition open only to subscribers of www.reddit.com. And entry is FREE! Simply answer this multiple-choice question to see if you are a twat: Q: Take a look at this picture and pick which penis would you like: NSFW http://www.moralogous.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/cutintact021.jpg A. The pink healthy one on the right, where the super-sensitive glands of the penis is protected and lubricated by the foreskin (3.5 billion…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 10:04 PM
1

Your parents sexually abused you by mutilating your penis, and you call it a "medical decision" LOL.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:21 PM
1

Many thanks for that clarification. I have put a note in my comment. Thanks again.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:28 PM
9

Female circumcision is much more brutal than male Sure. LOL. It's estimated that in Africa, far more male infants, boys and men die from MGM or have their penises amputated then women die from FGM or have serious complications. NSFL: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://youtu.be/WPthgNqG1YY?t=2m20s NSFL: Warning! Horrific photo collection from a Dutch doctor of hundreds of mutilated, amputated and seriously infecte…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 11:56 PM
7

Why not leave it up to the person whose foreskin it is — your little baby boy?
/r/MensRights25/06/14 11:55 PM
6

There is some good news in this. There is growing opposition to MGM in Norway - along with many other European countries. Many doctors, nurses, pediatricians, medical organisations etc. are vehemently opposed to it. But the political reality is, that it's hard to just slam the door shut in the face of such opposition from the Jewish and Muslim community, especially where it is not a major electoral issue. Which it should be, but it's not. And a Norwegian posted elsewhere that the current governm…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 11:47 PM
0

Yes female genital mutilation is worse. Not true in many types of FGM - one can argue they are equally damaging. But it's not a competition as they say!
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:48 PM
7

This women is a professional, who runs a charity supporting (amongst others) women who have been subject to the most extreme form of FGM - infibulation. This is where the labia lips are sewn shut. But she is quite clear, female and male genital mutilation are both totally unacceptable, and she works with a UK anti MGM group. As a man, thank you.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:33 AM
3

"Two obvious questions arise: (1) Why just on campus? If this is a good idea, why not make it part the tort system? If that’s too drastic, let’s start, with say, members of the California legislature. For internal disciplinary purposes, their sexual activity should be governed by the same standard they want to impose on students. What plausible grounds could they have for rejecting application of a standard they would impose on students to themselves?" Exactly. Perfectly put.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:40 PM
3

I think there is a difference. The original article is about what is effectively a marketing event for the company to bond their sales persons with their clients - to increase sales and sales persons' commissions etc. That must be non-discriminatory, and they are wrong to exclude female sales persons and female clients and gay sales people & clients who may have felt uncomfortable. Wrong not just legally, but it's a terrible business decision. The Forbes article is about "women only networks". T…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:40 AM
4

Why on earth they make such a basic blatant error is beyond me. It does show you that you need strong laws for equality - for all. And even with massive fines, companies still keep discriminating.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:32 AM
14

Well, I read that closely, and I have to agree it was discriminatory against her. Not right that she should be an employee, and excluded from such a work related social event.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:42 PM
1

I can't hear anyone laughing...
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:11 PM
1

Maybe all those: "Men - please don't rape women. Thanks" posters are having an effect after all :-)
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:46 PM
2

If he was in possession of messages along those lines then the police would have no choice but to abandon that particular charge. Not at all. The UK Director of Public Prosecutions is "worried" that not enough men are being convicted of rape by juries, and so they want to bend the rules further. The "Joint Rape Panel" concluded: "...the trauma of being raped will effect each victim differently." http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-need-to-take-rapes-more-seriously-admits-director-o…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 01:35 PM
18

...same old story: Took a year to go to the police, had just got back with her BF so was worried he would find out, texted the accused the day after to say all was OK.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:17 AM
2

Update: Ben Sullivan has been told that no charges will be brought against him. You can view the link in Chrome Incognito mode, or other browsers' private modes. Here is the full text A renowned expert in cyber stalking said she felt “threatened” and “intimidated” by the ringleader of a campaign to boycott the Oxford Union while its president is being investigated by police over rape allegations. Jennifer Perry, CEO of the Digital Trust and author of the UK guidelines on digital risks, has accus…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:57 PM
6

Hideous. Note how they call them adolescent "men". Of course, they are just children - under the age of 18. But they want to fudge it, so they can claim it's all part of the VMMC - Voluntary Male Medical Circumcision program.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:11 PM
1

Spot on! See my Aesop's Fable — The Fox who had Lost his Tale — below :-)
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:59 AM
2

The Fox Who had Lost his Tail — AKA /u/lordmadone It happened that a Fox caught its tail in a trap, and in struggling to release himself lost all of it but the stump. At first he was ashamed to show himself among his fellow foxes. But at last he determined to put a bolder face upon his misfortune, and summoned all the foxes to a general meeting to consider a proposal which he had to place before them. When they had assembled together the Fox proposed that they should all do away with their tails…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:57 AM
1

Same goes for female circumcision then — just a bit of "excess skin" is cut off, say the inner labia lips and then skinning the inner labia lips to remove the mucus membranes. All under sterile conditions with medical personnel of course. There are great health benefits to female circumcision — a 50 to 60% reduction in HIV: "Georgia State University, Public Health Theses" — a USA University of international renown: The Association between Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and the Risk of HIV/AIDS …
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:52 AM
5

Don't worry — the God Squad have legions of philosophers who will get round that one.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:36 PM
5

Here's what happens to little boys and men in Africa: It's estimated that in Africa, far more male infants, boys and men die from MGM or have their penises amputated then women die from FGM or have serious complications. NSFW: Warning! Extremely graphic video of African male genital mutilation being performed on unconsenting young boys: http://youtu.be/WPthgNqG1YY?t=2m20s NSFW: Warning! Horrific photo collection from a Dutch doctor of hundreds of mutilated, amputated and seriously infected penis…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:55 PM
4

Exactly. That's the best description I've ever heard of the issue. It covers every "reason" that's given for MGM & FGM — namely that they "improve" the genitals and/or sexual response in some way.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:47 PM
5

women are treated like property and are not even worth murdering over their religion Oppression! Women demand equal rights and campaign to be beheaded along with men. March planned for next Thursday at 3pm. Meet at the KFC by the gas station.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 10:24 PM
-1

Was that a Freudian gym-slip?
/r/MensRights17/06/14 10:10 PM
13

Law was opposed by these and many other organisations in Norway: The Norwegian Children’s Ombudsman The Norwegian Medical Ethical Association The Norwegian Association of Paediatrics The Norwegian Nurses Organization
/r/MensRights17/06/14 01:09 AM
2

I know
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:22 PM
7

I'm circumcised and don't feel disfigured at all YES! It's time to "Pick-Your-Penis" - an exclusive competition open only to subscribers of www.reddit.com. And entry is FREE! Simply answer this multiple-choice question to see if you are a twat: Q: Take a look at this picture and pick which penis would you like: NSFW http://www.moralogous.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/cutintact021.jpg A. The pink healthy one on the right, where the super-sensitive glands of the penis is protected and lubricated …
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:03 PM
6

There are far more important men's issues other than a little piece of skin Q: Which one of the following two photographs would you deem "genital mutilation"? Note that you have to work out which picture is which. SAFE FOR WORK Picture A NSFW: NOT SAFE FOR WORK Picture B One picture shows the amount of flesh removed from a 3 month old girl undergoing "sunat" in Malaysia. Here, a scalpel is used by a nurse or doctor to shave off a tiny bit of flesh from the mound on the prepuce of the clitoris. i…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:20 PM
8

It's exactly what she is saying. But you have become normalised to male genital mutilation so much, that even though you are against it, you fail to see the abuse when it's right in front of your eyes. She is gushing with enthusiasm and love for mutilating them — never mind just a bit of "enjoyment".
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:30 PM
7

if you knew anything about the religion Well this guys knows all about "the religion" for sure: Watch this evil Mohel showing and boasting about the “instruments” he uses to torture and mutilate little Jewish boys. Or as he calls it: ”tickling” them. Evil child abusing Mohel Here he states quite clearly that the purpose of him mutilating little boys’ genitals is to damage their sexuality: Mutilate infants to damage their sexuality
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:15 PM
1

The funny thing is, is that he'll most likely receive much better care in an HM prison then he will do in a care home! There have been numerous scandals in the UK with old folks being abused in badly run care homes. And prisons spend far more per head then care home do.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:38 AM
14

I'm not sure that questioning the valid feminist-related issues is a beneficial way to proceed. Correct, that's why I said: "I'm not saying it's all wrong" And how can you distinguish between the valid and un-valid ones if you don't question them all? Jesus, learn how to read and think logically, please.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:03 PM
79

I think that's a great "learning" experience. You should learn some very deep lessons from that, as it reveals a lot about the mindset of the folks you are hanging out with. Maybe you should start to question everything else they believe in and the agenda they push? I'm not saying it's all wrong, but rather use what you have learnt to see everything in a new light.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:57 PM
1

Did anyone watch this?... the video is pro-circumcision. Did you watch it /u/dalkon? Life is more nuanced than that and the video is clearly not fully "pro-circumcision". It highlights the deaths and injuries caused by "traditional" tribal male genital mutilation - just like the deaths and injuries caused by female genital mutilation. That alone is a "surprise" to many western viewers and valuable knowledge to have in the fight against MGM - which all too often we are told it's "nothing" like FG…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:36 PM
1

Totally agree. I hope everyone wipes their hands after shaking hands with William Hague. He supported the "war" in Afghanistan and voted for the "war" in Iraq. How many dead men and women does he have on his conscience?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:41 PM
3

It's called "non-therapeutic" circumcision. AKA: Child Sex Abuse
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:47 PM
4

Cool. Done.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:53 PM
15

I've flaired this as "Men's Rights News" as it's boys who 99% of the time are portrayed as the difficult "trouble-makers" in schools.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:26 PM
1

Homology is the word you are looking for :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_homologues_of_the_human_reproductive_system And it's always good to know that just because two parts of the genitals or body are homologous, does not make them equivalent in size, properties or function. eg: the female and male nipples and breasts are homologous. But female breasts have far more size, properties and functions than male breasts. Amputation of the breasts of a man for breast cancer is terrible; but I…
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter