~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | bruhThat's... Not what free speech is about | /r/AntiFeminists | 25/12/20 08:58 AM |
| 9 | bruhEqual rights means equal lefts | /r/AntiFeminists | 25/12/20 08:57 AM |
| 1 | What?All good, I even forgot to think about how some woman don't say anything until the baby is born, I assumed both parents knew about the pregnancy right away which is a very silly assumption. So to the original "law" idea i think it's great to add the obligation from the mother to inform the father if she wants financial support, if you don't say anything and you HAD the chance to abort and carried on just cause you know the man has to provide even if that takes literal gods out of his table then … | /r/AntiFeminists | 01/12/20 06:39 PM |
| 2 | What?Well I'm saying that if the decision is not mutual to carry with the baby then the man holds no responsibility if he declined the baby. The woman has to inform the father on reasonable times in order to hold him responsable . You don't seem to have read what I said lol | /r/AntiFeminists | 01/12/20 06:05 PM |
| 7 | What?How I see it is this: yes, if you allow abortion then it's mostly the woman choice, the man can try and persuade her, but it's her call. BUT if you the woman chose to have the baby and the man wants to abort, then the man holds no financial responsibility and also loses any right over the child. The other way around can't work because if she wants to abort the baby you can't just take it off her and give it to the man, so I don't see a work around until medical tecnology for am artificial uterus… | /r/AntiFeminists | 01/12/20 05:41 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter