TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wanked_in_space Archive

View 0 posts and 1,020 comments by wanked_in_space on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,020 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

His advocacy surronding men's rights is hollow So Galloway's kind of hollow, eh?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 03:33 AM
3

When a title is a lie and you have to read the article to get the truth, it's an example of what some would call fake news. What's happening is wrong. Present the facts and don't embellish. Otherwise the whole thing is painted as a lie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 05:41 AM
1

No, they're both crimes. It's simply the gravity of the crime that changes. Imagine making this argument to win an argument. It's the same bullshit thinking that is used to pretend sexual assault and sexual harassment are equal, when both are clearly wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 02:26 AM
-8

Is there a difference between assault and murder?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 02:12 AM
1

You've literally quoted the line that says they were asked to deprioritize, not stop. The actual question was: How often do you pass on qualified candidates because they are not "diverse enough"? 16.6% said very often and 31.2% said somewhat often. Yes. I've quoted what seems to be the truth, but the title of this article is, based on this quote, a lie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 01:53 AM
-11

I'm not so sure there is a big difference, aside from plausible deniability from the person who gave the order. "Won't someone rid me of this meddlesome priest white male?" The difference is one means white men are never hired, and the other means they are less frequently than they would be otherwise. I'm not a fan of this, but pretending these are the same is, at best, disingenuous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 01:51 AM
-16

1 in 6 have been asked to deprioritize hiring white men So were they told to stop hiring white men or deprioritize hiring white men? Because there is a big difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 01:22 AM
1

(The same goes for the progressive racism against white.) Anyone who thinks there is racism against whites that outweighs the racism against literally any other race in the US is delusional.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 01:20 AM
-9

I agree he made some shitty arguments, but i can't say that i can agree with yours either. The people who have and will be affected. Look at the age of women effected by the lack of abortions. Can you find me a single man who is currently that age who has been drafted? Theoretical vs real risks. It's something like 1 in 4 women who will have abortions. There hasn't been a draft in 50 years. While it is possible that it could happen, warfare has changed greatly so its quite unlikely. If you've go…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/22 06:03 PM
-2

You are correct. It signifies that, but it doesn't really contribute directly to it as much as even the media commenting on death as "100 dead, including 30 women and children" as if only the 30 matter. I am not American, but I would sign up for a selective services if it gave American women back the right of choice. The only thing he is partially right about is that this isn't about women vs men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/22 05:17 PM
-6

If I were trying to lampoon anti choice arguments, I couldn't do better than this argument. Bravo. It'd take long time to debunk this entire post (I don't care enough to). The arguments are absolute garbage all the way through this post. I'll use the comparison of the lack of access in having an abortion to being required to register for selective services: The people who have and will be affected. Look at the age of women effected by the lack of abortions. Can you find me a single man who is cu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/22 04:30 PM
59

Poster makes a post about his dislike of being talked down to. Is immediately talked down to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/22 01:01 PM
1

Now we know why the US has high cost of medical care yet still has poor outcomes.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 05:10 AM
118

And to be fair, some men are not good at all. Really, some people regardless of sex are not good at all.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 06:30 PM
1

Which they really should have. Consent can be withdrawn at any step for a medical procedure. Not getting his consent at this point will end up winning him the case in the Supreme Court.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 11:04 PM
112

Have people sign in person.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 12:43 PM
6

Only if you don't demand a raise from time to time. Or rather, discuss this interesting job opportunity you might be taking because it'll pay more.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:50 AM
0

I think the guy is just asking you boy to be an asshole. I'll be honest, I stopped reading after the first paragraph because I'm not going to listen to anything you have to say after a comment like this: Alright, let me explain this shit for all of our mentally challenged friends from /r/all who couldn't find their own ass with a map and a compass. This should all be clear to anyone who doesn't need help dressing themselves in the morning, but let's assume you're all at least a little bit litera…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 02:55 PM
3

Well, no. Most births are going to proceed just fine and result in a healthy mother and child, even if there has been a previous cesarean. Birth isn't surgery. It's something that is supposed to happen. The risk of complications in all births is very small. While I will admit that my example was lazy, the risk of complication is higher in VBAC than in a standard delivery. ... but still and all, go to the fucking hospital if you have previously required a surgical intervention to safely give birt…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 07:25 PM
6

Having a bad outcome after a home birth after a caesarean is about as predictable as having a bad outcome with DIY home surgery. The writer here doesn't seem to comprehend that.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:54 PM
3

The mod is acting like a teenager because they are likely a teenager.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 07:38 AM
2

Is this what we have to do now – portray men as gross, weird, nerdy or evil suppressors, in order to make ourselves feel good, because if that is the feminist deal then I’m out. This is why I have been out for many years. Yup.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:37 PM
2

If you lied about it as you are suggesting and you weren't actually in harms way, they'd probably charge you with charge you with manslaughter.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 02:43 AM
16

"I'm often saying that [men are] solving problems that they are uniquely feeling." "I don't want to make sweeping generalizations." Did I accidentally stumble into /r/nottheonion?
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:10 PM
0

Having higher expectations isn't the same as having impossible expectations. I'm not defending being unreasonable, but let's not be unreasonable ourselves.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:20 PM
-1

I've never found this true of women's expectations.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:58 PM
1

You do realize that there are racists on all sides right? Saying racist doesn't exclude blacks/ Asians/ whites/ etc. Easy there, Trump. No one is claiming there aren't. We're talking about actual racists on one side that were being obviously racist. If someone wants to believe that one race is superior to another, I won't fault them for it. Just like I don't fault people for thinking their lives are all mapped out for them by someone they can't see or hear that has the power to create everything…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 02:21 AM
1

I believe it shows that we're in bigger trouble than we thought.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:33 AM
0

Such as? I won't condemn the guys who are just fucking so tired of being labeled wrongly that they decide to join these groups and actually feel like they belong. Hell, even if some men and women actually believe in white supremacy, I won't condemn them, simply because it seems that society is fine with female supremacy (feminism), black supremacy (BLM), or anything else that ISN'T about white men. It's like saying that you're not ashamed to be a white male is now unacceptable. Fuck that. I'm as…
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:31 AM
3

You make a fair point. We do live in a world where questions are accusations.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 06:04 PM
6

So shouldn't we do something in this community to help prevent this radicalization? It's a small minority, but still.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:05 PM
-6

I'm not a white supremacist, but I can sure as hell see the road to becoming one clearly enough. Try telling working class guys like me that we have more power and opportunity then Obama's kids because we are white men... and you will see more and more guys just give up fighting and become the monster in the closet. So all it'll take for you to become a white supremacist is some words? If that's the case, is Slate really that far off with their article? I mean, I get that you're saying that feel…
/r/MensRights18/08/17 02:29 PM
2

If there's a statement said almost solely by white supremacists, excuse my concern for seeing it quoted almost verbatim days after one of them killed a person with their car.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:55 AM
16

This quote right here was literally said by the white supremacists.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:13 AM
-7

This subreddit has been falling more and more right wing every week. They exaggerate quite a bit, but look around.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:07 AM
4

But my sex has nothing to do with my desire to avoid conscription. But your sex does have everything to do with your ability to avoid being drafted.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 04:48 PM
0

Can we get another source to confirm this story?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:49 AM
4

Even while aggressively arguing for unlimited access to abortion at any point during pregnancy and demanding that others pay for it. It is for the good of society if we pay for abortion of unwanted children. It helps cut down crime and ensure there are less abused children.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 07:44 PM
9

TIL reality is sexist.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 04:04 PM
43

Of course. Doors should only be shut in the faces of men.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:22 AM
21

Like, yes This is where to stop, like, reading this review or at least giving it any credence.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 07:35 AM
247

Proving the fraud only protects you from FUTURE fraud.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:33 AM
2

It's more like 4 out of 5 of the top comments.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 05:39 AM
2

Uncle Tyrone died of a stroke.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:51 PM
6

The same thing that's done for other problems people care about: public education.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 08:04 PM
20

It's breast and cervical cancer. The medical establishment just shrugs their shoulders about men not accessing it enough and dying. I mean, at that point they've already done their work, right?
/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:28 PM
5

I am sure tons of you will immediately jump to all religion should be banned because that's popular here but I disagree- Christian Science legally allows parents to allow their children to die from easily prevented deaths because they don't believe in medicine, johavas witnesses do not believe in blood transfusions which results in hundreds of preventable deaths - I am not saying these things should be stoped, I am just saying they are also legal Jehovah's witnesses can make their own decisions,…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:50 PM
4

I'd be hesitant to lump MR groups with prolife groups as members of prolife groups have literally murdered and bombed people. And they resort to harassment and intimidation. We do not want any of that.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:22 AM
3

And full disclosure, sometimes there are guys in this group that are obviously carrying around some hatred for women as well and we enjoy stereotyping. I'm not sure if this has gotten worse in the last year or so, but it seems worse. Although that might seem to be the case because of more memes about feminists. I dunno.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:00 AM
-4

Of course. That's what equality is you moron. If you decide that in a monogamous relationship that you're going to cheat on someone, then yes, you should be voided of anything of the other persons. You misunderstand both the law and what I said. There is no "other person's" only what is the married couple's, ie the marital assets. That is what they are splitting. And I was asking if he cheated on her, would he get nothing from the marital assets. Quick to call people names, yet slower in the wit…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:14 PM
-1

Would you say the same if he cheated?
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:33 PM
26

Each getting 39% for being married and him getting an extra 22% for actually doing the work is what he is arguing. Frankly, I agree with him.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:22 PM
7

Feminists are jelly. A recent poll determined that stay at home moms have the highest happiness rate of any occupation. That includes high flyin' career gals. I bet you stay at home dad's aren't to far behind. Imagine your family being well off enough that they only needed one income. How is that a bad thing?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 05:14 PM
26

Men and women are 100% equal in their contributions to society and anyone who says otherwise is a sexist pig. Except childbirth, which only women do. And they are better at childcare, too. Society in 2017, everyone.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:44 PM
8

I do think it's different. I'm a guy who wasn't circumcised and from personal experience I wish that I had been. Other than the hygienic reasons I also have phimosis which means my foreskin is too tight so the turtleneck becomes a fucking rubber band strangling my knob. Also it's annoying to pee with foreskin. Circumstances is the last line treatment for phimosis and it is not a common problem. Chopping something off because it MIGHT cause a problem is not recommended in any other area of medici…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:41 PM
7

In the end, it's all about sex and controlling it.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:28 PM
662

"That's different."
/r/MensRights11/03/17 03:21 PM
4

Ryerson is a joke When you can only use a specific set of sources, it's likely your premise is fully bullshit
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:46 AM
9

It's wrong when prison guards abuse their power against inmates. It's wrong when doctors abuse their power against patients and it's wrong when teachers do it to students. It's not quite rape, but it's a sex crime.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:04 PM
18

Women who expect men to pay for them are not monsters. They are, however, not a small minority.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:32 PM
1

I acknowledge your opinion. But if you try to take a neutral point of view, you would also have to acknowledge that other people draw the line somewhere else. Consider for example the following: A baby is not even able to live independently once its born. We are mamals after all. I never once said independently. I only said independent of their mother. And in terms of live sustaining functions thats also not a clear line. I don't believe that any doctor could make a save and clear statement when…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:49 AM
1

Thank you for the calm analysis of my argument, it's refreshing not getting keyboard vomited at. Likewise.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:04 AM
1

Well, I have made my statement neutral, because I know that we all would agree that a baby has rights, but that different people would have a different opinion on when a bunch of cell becomes a baby. As said, I am with you on pro choice. But your stance, that it only becomes a baby once its born is maybe as extreme of a statement as to say it is a baby from the moment the sperm hit the egg cell. I mean, you wouldn't abort a day before you are due, would you? I've made my position quite clear, an…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:03 AM
1

Yes, my point was exactly that one shouldn't counter a non-biological argument with a biological one. So I agree here. (Though in general I believe you cannot dismiss biology in every aspect of social life. We are socially advanced lifeforms, yes, but we are also to a large extend biologically determined. But thats not necessarily the matter here.) You're the one unnecessarily bringing in biology into this argument. You did not clearly say what you were trying to say. An embryo is not a baby. A …
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:00 PM
2

Fuck punishing the unborn because women choose to not face consequences. You cannot punish what is not alive on its own. Unless you live in a world where everything has feelings. You'll fight for murder cause you're absolute scum. You keep name calling because you're incapable of higher arguments. I will not kill children to convenience myself. Neither will I. But I also won't call an embryo or a fetus a child to further my agenda.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:46 PM
2

It is that women "win" and men "lose" if women have abortion rights but men are still given zero choices once the egg has been fertilized. You're essentially saying that women have the right to choose whether or not they have a baby and they have a right to choose whether or not men have to financially support their decision. Men should be given a choice once a child is born (which they should obviously share much earlier). This is a separate argument. Men should not have a choice with regards t…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:43 PM
1

Because mortality rates include people who got treatment and still died. More importantly, no one should have things happen to their bodies without their consent. So if you get knocked out in a car accident, EMS personnel shouldn't be able to save you're life? EMS treat people with implied consent, meaning they'll treat you assuming that's what a reasonable person would want until they can ascertain your consent. If you become conscious, you can remove your consent at that time. You can also hav…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:38 PM
1

Just because something has a legal definition doesn't mean the definition is correct or separated from the philosophical argument. Philosophically I think assisted suicide should be allowed, legally it is not. Using the term "philosophically" is clouding the argument a bit here because it can include things such as ethics, morality, etc, but I think I understand that you mean. Several counties and even several states allow it and they are the tip of the iceberg. A medical definition certainly ho…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:17 PM
1

"That's exactly my point. No one forced you to have sex. No one forced you to do whatever it was that broke your arm. Both are "your fault". We'd never dream of not providing medical care for your broken arm because it was your fault." But if you received care for your broken arm, why can't a mother or a child receive care helping them out with their pregnancy if something bad happened? Because mortality rates include people who got treatment and still died. More importantly, no one should have …
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:09 AM
3

I 100% agree. And the child should be apprehended from the rapist mother. They obviously cannot be trusted with children. I'm not going to punish all women because some women rape, just as I wouldn't punish all men because some men rape.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:41 AM
1

Why the hell should a man be forced to work 18 years to provide for a child he had no interest in creating? That's a good question without an easy answer, but I'll give it a try: The choice is between injustice for the father or tough life for the child. And society values children and does not value men. This is why it happens, I do not condone this.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:40 AM
2

Murder is not a right but until that's reflected in courts men should be able to forfeit parental responsibility just as women do. Fuck this attitude. Fuck punishing women because men suffer. This is the argument of weak people or children. I will fight for women's abortion rights and for men's right for self determination. I will not drag one down to make the other feel higher up.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:37 AM
1

I actually agree with a lot of points on both sides of the argument, but don't say a embryo is not a child and a fetus is not a child. That's an entirely philosophical argument about what constitutes a person. It's not a philosophical argument. It's a medical and also legal argument. "Child" has a definition that is not met at all by an embryo. A late term fetus could be called a child if it is able to survive outside its mother. Obviously, most of the time people, myself included, use it colloq…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:35 AM
1

""You had sex so deal with the consequences." That's what you're saying here. "You broke your arm, deal with it. Oh, we could do surgery, but you were reckless so we won't. It's your own fault." Nobody forced you to do said action that breaks the arm though. But you DID have a choice in having sex. These two are nowhere close to the same. That's exactly my point. No one forced you to have sex. No one forced you to do whatever it was that broke your arm. Both are "your fault". We'd never dream of…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:18 AM
2

How about giving men the right to rid themselves of any privileges and responsibilities associated with a child? I'd argue that that's the same thing abortion is in principle. Both are means of ridding yourself of responsibility for a child, and neither infringes upon a person's bodily autonomy. In a perfect world, I'd 100% support this. We don't live in a perfect world and the mother at least needs some help during the first year of the kids life, even if it's her decision. In a perfect world, …
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:08 AM
-1

The risk for women you are talking about here is biologically determined. Its hardly men's fault that thats the case, and if it was changeable by law noone would be against it, but it isn't since it is biology. You can hardly bring this as argument of why in the financial and care taking responsibilities, the woman has more say than the man. If we're talking strictly biology, the male should be providing resources for the female and offspring. Arguing biology is dumb. We are higher beings than s…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:59 AM
2

Who gets to decide if abortion is morally wrong? Why do you get to say that carrying a child you conceived is fucked up? I'm saying that being forced to carry a baby when that is not your choice is wrong. Key word being "forced". If you want to compare pregnancy complications to abortion complications, do it. But do it right. Don't cut out details to fit your agenda. I'm citing a study that is from the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Care to share the "right" data? Fine, if you don't want …
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:50 AM
8

Yes, women have all the risk during pregnancy/birth and men have none. Men have all the risk after this and women have the risk but can mitigate it with adoption if they want. I'm only stating that my first sentence cannot be ignored in this. I don't want women to be punished because men get punished. I want men to stop being punishes.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:42 PM
4

Good thing the US is not spending all this money to stop abortions and is spending it on preventing women from dying. Oh, wait.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:39 PM
8

"The risk of death in pregnancy is something like 15 in 100,000. The risk of death in abortion is something like 0.5 in 100,000. So pregnancy is quite a bit riskier than abortion." This does not justify anything, it's like me using a higher risk factor to ban police officers from having guns due to a higher chance they'll shoot someone. That is a terrible analogy. That is like giving a police department the choice of using guns or another weapon. And even then this analogy misses the point by a …
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:36 PM
7

Going to need some sources bud. My cited source was 8 and 0.6, rather than 15 and 0.5. It was linked in the post you responded to. This stat applies to the abortion itself, and does not take into account the incredible increase in death rates AFTER an abortion. Not to mention, PP in particular will either not report botched abortions or will list the death as an unrelated reason. Of course, the same thing could never be said of pregnancy. This is what I despise about my generation. You care more…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:29 PM
19

The risk of death in pregnancy is something like 15 in 100,000. The risk of death in abortion is something like 0.5 in 100,000. So pregnancy is quite a bit riskier than abortion. And why the hell shouldn't women have the right to not put themselves at that risk? And why the hell should a woman have to justify wanting an abortion?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 06:48 PM
11

I see a lot of "feels before reals" here about feminists, but that's EXACTLY what you're doing right now, putting your biases ahead of facts I have presented.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 06:11 PM
155

I'm sorry, reproductive rights (with regard to abortion) just have no equivalent in men and bringing that up is stupid. Especially if you allow for abortion when the woman's health is threatened. Why? Because pregnancy is far riskier than abortion by definition. Source
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:36 PM
1

I've noticed a shift. There's a lot less about men being screwed over in court and requests for help and a lot more negative posts.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:58 AM
1

I am insinuating nothing. I am flat out saying that his fanning of the racist flames is responsible for the rise of extremism (mostly of the white supremacist kind) in the United States and Canada. That definitely played a role here.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:45 AM
3

I really just don't interact with anyone who disagrees with Trump policies being from the Southern US. That's disconcerting. Whether your beliefs are right or left wing, you need to be exposed to the other side of the story. Sometimes they have some good ideas that you might agree with. I think draining the swamp would be an excellent idea. Except Trump has done the exact opposite of that based on his appointments. I think his racist rhetoric has inflamed your country and has washed over into a …
/r/MensRights05/02/17 10:34 PM
1

Building a wall. Talking of banning Muslims. Then what appears to be indiscriminately banning people from Muslim countries. I guess if you're looking for someone who has been tricked by the mainstream media about Trump, that's me.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 09:39 PM
1

Racist and hateful rhetoric and policies.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 09:23 PM
4

You're accusing all of the protestors of being under the thrall of that group rather than using them to be able to protest.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 06:08 PM
9

If I were an American, I'd definitely be protesting. So it irks me that you think people like me are either brainwashed or bought and paid for. It's speaks lowly of your opinions of other people.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 06:05 PM
1

Sorry, but that's the point, it's not 'just' a small organisation of people, instead of dismissing me you should really go and do some research on it. As I said, not all of them are professional activists, that is a small number, but these people are definitely responsible for antagonising and organising the larger groups of protesters that genuinely believe in their bullshit. I'm dismissing you because you're lumping anyone you disagree with into a group and saying they're all funded because so…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 05:59 PM
2

That's not the protestors. That's the mainstream media and academia.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 05:20 PM
3

Compared to the population of the United States it's a very small portion, BUT when you compare it to the amount of active political protesters it's pretty significant. Imagine you're a regular person that doesn't know much about politics, what would you eventually come to learn after a decade of seeing protesters that all want the same thing? It's a slow but sure brainwashing, BLM is the literal definition of a paid political movement and look how far it got into the minds of the regular populo…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 04:59 PM
8

It's so hard not to sound like a conspiracy theorist but the fact is with the scale of everything and that there is actual evidence for what these people get up to there is no other way these people could be so organised and have the time or resources to do all this, it is absolutely remarkable when you take the time to look at it all. Because there is organization by a small group of people does not indicate that the vast majority of the rest don't just hate Trump and what he stands for. There …
/r/MensRights05/02/17 04:53 PM
10

The problem is, the political class and the professional activists who benefit from all this corruption hate that idea, which is one of the real reasons they're out on the streets now trying to protest Trump, they know their free ride is over and so they're lashing out at everyone because of it. How many professional activists do you think there are in the US? What you say just isn't based in reality.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 03:49 PM
2

The exaggeration is fairly significant, but then I look at the mainstream media Ave social media and I e nothing but tumble weeds.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 05:23 AM
17

They're in the category of "things that don't directly help people in day to day life". Don't get me wrong, I think both ate important, but neither make the world turn.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 08:16 AM
129

The right to choose. That's actually a very interesting take on this.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 02:02 PM
5

Now, what kind of feminism are we talking? The academic feminism that is stifling the world, or the happy feminism that feminists pretend is all feminism feminism but is only a fraction?
/r/MensRights22/01/17 05:31 AM
8

I hate to sound totally reddit about this, but is there a new MRA subreddit with out the bullshit?
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:08 AM
1

I don't support her. But the NDP is more loudly playing gender politics. At least from my vantage point outside of BC.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:05 AM
131

I've started to question this place now that the same posts show up on here and the_Donald.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:39 PM
1

I'm not sure what your point is. That liberal voters cared or NDP voters just didn't give a fuck.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:12 AM
1

The last election showed that you are a minority.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 11:34 PM
17

There are sexists on both sides. Men who say shit like this about women are derided as sexist pigs. Women who say likewise about men are celebrated as feminist warriors.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 06:54 PM
-3

The comments in this thread paint this subreddit in a bad light and should not be what this subreddit is about.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:21 PM
43

Rempel... called Nenshi’s remarks condescending. Because they were. He effectively called her a moron. She called him a sexist. Politicians who play gender politics are the worst.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:12 PM
13

No, they don't.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 04:50 PM
46

It'd shit like this that'll keep the Liberals in power in BC forever. People do not like gender politics.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 04:06 PM
8

Sarcasm. But it's what they'd say, isn't it?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 08:42 AM
6

You criticized a woman and are on a MR forum. What further proof of your sexism is necessary?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 08:33 AM
3

I think we spend too much time on the crimes women have committed. There are both men and women who are abhorrent humans. We should be acknowledging the fact that men can also be victims, because that is what is most forgotten.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 04:34 AM
15

They have a tiny difference and claim to control for all of these factors. The most telling variable is that women see less patients. Any physician that sees less patients as a hospitalist will have better results. That would be true for a mechanic that fixes less cars a day or a chef that makes less meals a day.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 05:09 PM
22

Well I don't disagree with them. Female victims are overlooked. The male victims are well known and actively not given a shit about.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 05:23 PM
3

The thing is, it may be her body, but it's their relationship. If she's not prepared to listen to his input (in the end it's obviously her decision), then there is no relationship.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 05:13 AM
1

I was referencing exactly this exchange, which is why I said like mansplaining, but mansplaining =/= manterrupting
/r/MensRights01/12/16 04:06 AM
23

OP posted an imgur link. For karma.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 03:35 PM
449

This is the first I've ever heard of this term. And it's been added by an MRA group. I'll be impressed once we see it used by politicians, like mansplaining.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:54 PM
2

He didn't gender it up like he did here.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 02:12 PM
4

I agree. Let's not overreact. I'm waiting for his posts on talking to our sons about suicide and homelessness. Come on JT!
/r/MensRights29/11/16 08:19 AM
60

"still lives with his parents" Written about both. And the value of their parents homes was included. Is anyone even surprised any more?
/r/MensRights22/11/16 07:42 PM
1

over a simple election. That's all it is?
/r/MensRights15/11/16 03:59 PM
2

I also would downvote the equivalent of a repost.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:45 AM
0

It says in the article there was no evidence to support what she claimed, but it also seems like they didn't really have evidence that she flat out lied.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 05:11 AM
5

So what you're saying is that women are the true victims here?
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:14 PM
0

There is nothing wrong with smart steroid use, the same can't be said about eating disorders, false equivalence. If you're using them to bulk without the observation of a doctor, that is, by definition, not smart steroid use.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:49 PM
10

Eating disorders are universally unhealthy, that's why we call them disorders. Staroids, if used correctly and sparingly, are not bad for you and can be a significant boost to your ability to work out. Anabolic steroids are safe... Except for the risk of heart attack, stroke, high blood pressure, liver problems, testicular atrophy, stunted growth in younger people, tendon rupture and potentially even cancer. Not to mention the potential risks involved with injection drug use and dealing with dru…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:45 PM
-5

This abortion = promiscuity garbage needs to stop. And please explain how pro life attitudes are better for everyone else. I'm quite curious.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 03:58 PM
842

How dare he limit her right to violently assault him?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:20 PM
40

Primary school students will be exposed to images of both boys and girls doing household chores, playing sport and working as firefighters and receptionists. Standards are lowered to allow women to be firefighters. Has anything been done to help men into receptionist jobs?
/r/MensRights15/10/16 02:09 PM
3

White looking? You've got white privilege.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:59 AM
2

Considering it's men becoming women who are far more targeted with hate, it should be called transmisandry.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 04:09 PM
2

Do you disagree with her language or the fact that women are socialized to make decisions that ultimately impact their work income? No. But men have to "man up" and work more because they are socialized to believe that they have to be the provider. It's hard to talk about one and not the other.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 02:21 PM
4

I cringe every time I see the word "femiloon" because trying to discredit anyone by name calling is bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 01:51 PM
8

the violent bust-up came after she had been ‘provoked for years’ by Mr Hoyland. Isn't that what all abusers say? They made me do it.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 05:31 PM
6

First Johnny Depp, now Brad Pitt. Who's next?
/r/MensRights23/09/16 01:22 PM
13

Nothing says "we're the good guys" like invoking Communist imagery and wearing masks.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 03:03 PM
15

It's people like her who push sane people out of the left.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 03:08 AM
1

I wouldn't go that far. Literally the only cause of cervical cancer is HPV. There are other causes of oral cancers and this is being further studies currently.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 01:28 AM
1

I've looked into the data, and you are correct. The fact that boys don't get this vaccine is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 08:56 PM
1

this is a Denial of healthcare based on nothing more than money It's a cost saving measure, not a sexist plot. The cost to the health care system is worth it to eliminate cervical cancers, but it's likely the money could be better spent on prostate cancer than HPV for boys. There are finite dollars and I'm not sure the benefits justify the cost in this case.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:25 PM
-1

Are you a fucking ass?
/r/MensRights14/09/16 03:00 AM
-13

I don't mean to be a dick, but someone should look up the death rate from cervical cancer and compare it to the death rate of penile cancer (& potentially HPV linked oral cancers) before applauding this. Thr reason this should be done is herd immunity, not to "be fair". Men make up 1% of breast cancer deaths and we don't routinely mammogram men, do we? Edit: This is downvoted? At least express some opinions.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 12:22 AM
1

I don't like all the things I see here in Mensrights. But stories like this one make it abundantly clear that we need this subreddit. Sums things up nicely.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 03:52 PM
2

I agree. It's a negative thing if you can't see your own bias, not a positive.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 09:03 PM
3

I'm at a loss as to why this is getting downvoted.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 12:42 PM
5

Even Canadian agencies use American stats if Canadian stats aren't available. In this case, he chose American stats to support his own narrative.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 05:09 AM
9

Are we talking about men or black people? I just need to know what type of prejudice you look through your daily life with.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:44 PM
0

Also lacking the good discussion.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 05:19 PM
26

The quote without editing: The school had received complaints from male students and worried the lounge’s women-only designation could alienate transgender students. “Thus, we decided on an open lounge for all students, rather than adding a male-only lounge,” Cody wrote in an email. It's quite clear that men complained and they also are concerned about transgendered students, not that they didn't care about men at all.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 04:06 PM
22

Any comment about women is sexist, didn't you know? Shit, now I'm a sexist.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 04:46 PM
7

She's not talking to you because your are a "sexist creep", you know that, right? In her mind, that's all you are. It's fucked up.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:40 AM
8

In Canada, apologizing is not tantamount to admitting any guilt.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:27 AM
1

Not at all. You can still be racist against all the other races. But historically black have had a bad experience with being called apes. It'd be like men being pissed off about being told to "man up", while women wouldn't be as bothered by that as it didn't historically cover up men's issues in our society like inequality in divorce court and the rates of male suicide.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 01:34 PM
1

Because one race had the fact that it was ape like used in the justification for slavery. All other races did not.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 02:06 AM
6

I'm surprised Lego hasn't come out to decry her actions. Maybe someone should email them the article.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 04:57 AM
3

The second wasn't a sarcastic, accusatory question, but one made from a position of ignorance that seemed to be corrected. People shouldn't be afraid to ask questions like that.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:03 PM
23

Let's pretend he did influence her into doing it. She's still a monster for doing it. Infants these are infants.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 07:31 AM
2

Did anyone actually read the article? The author is attacking those that believe this, not supporting this belief.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 04:39 PM
52

Yeah, but the biggest victim was Private Ryan's mom.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 08:15 AM
2

While his reasoning is garbage, his comment is most definitely correct: causing the death of your child is worse than a sexual assault of digital penetration. That's just not debatable. The argument the guy is making suggests some issues in his line of thinking, but screaming at him isn't going to change his line of thinking.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 12:51 AM
5

"I stabbed him in self defence" Oh? "I stabbed him repeatedly in self defence" Repeatedly? "I then beat him as he tried to get away, in self defence"
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:59 PM
1

That's a great philosophical and medical dilemma. My sperm is human as is my skin. When my sperm and skin cells die, life is ending, but a human life is not ending. Sperm can become a human life, skin cannot.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 08:17 PM
1

Fine. You win the semantic argument. I'm talking about the fact that the debate is whether a human life is ending or not. That is what I thought you were referencing with "life".
/r/MensRights16/06/16 08:16 PM
0

I think the general implication is that it's the end of a human life. That's the point that is debatable. I'm sorry of that was not clear.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:47 PM
1

The fact that terminating a fetus is ending a life. That's debatable.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:30 PM
1

if you get an abortion you're guaranteed to be ending a life. Yeah, that's debatable.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:10 PM
1

Not us, but the police. Police should not be judging anything. Now if the police were to approach a judge with some evidence to request some sort of a temporary order, I might not be against that. Thing is, we have to also protect the public. There will be always time between crimes and court. Alleged crimes. The fact that you are a victim of a crime does not mean every alleged victim was.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 06:03 AM
1

How are we to judge objectively if proof presented is worthy? Most of the time there is no video. And witness testimony is far from infallible. Not that I personally doubt what you are saying, the court has to. And the lack of communication across provincial borders is not the question here, but rather whether one can be accused by an anonymous victim, which goes against the very basis of our justice system. Although I think we are arguing different points.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 05:48 AM
5

Not every man accused of a crime is guilty.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 03:47 AM
3

I'm saying that punishing innocents is bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:57 AM
2

I'm not sure what the innocent person has to do with that. Care to explain what you mean a but more precisely?
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:36 AM
1

So put things on the warrant that are objectively true and leave those out that are alleged? I don't think anyone would fight you on that.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:04 AM
17

So we should forget the innocent to increase the chance of catching the guilty?
/r/MensRights13/06/16 01:07 AM
1

While she may not be wrong that some guys on tinder are pieces of shit, she's painting all men as responsible. The other thing that stuck out to me is the Mitch Hedberg-like "all I either get is hey or harassment", or as he would say, "do you ever use sugar or PCP?".
/r/MensRights12/06/16 03:46 PM
4

Do you actually think Trump is going to build a wall?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 01:49 PM
28

Yeah, no guy would ever be made out to be the victim in this situation or any shits given about his depression.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:16 PM
26

Well, honey, you see it's because women have historically been the biggest victims of war.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:07 PM
3

Christ almighty, when you treat women like would would pre teens, that is not feminism.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 01:56 PM
1

well, 20 men groping at once, pulling off clothes and bras. Occasionally sticking fingers into orifices. Forcing kisses. Full rapes were just a few. Ok, that's way more than groping. That's messed up.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 12:43 PM
3

After the Cologne Gropefest, Mayor Henriette Reker recommended a code of conduct for the maedchen. Wait, was that all only groping? Not that it's ok.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:02 AM
6

She can do what she wants. My issue with this is that her experiment isn't seen as sociopathic. One guy decided she wasn't worth it. But seriously, if he wasn't going for a second date, why care what she thought of him splitting the bill. You can learn a lot about a woman by her actions. Expecting you to foot the bill while railing on about equality. That recipe for pulling the rip cord.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:00 AM
1

But Brad Pitt and George Cloney. Checkmate, shitlord.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:59 AM
1

I take it you're not familiar with the Oxford comma?
/r/MensRights31/05/16 03:05 PM
2

She sounds like the type of person to come into someone's house and tell them how to do things.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 04:25 PM
9

Interesting points here: The accused's name is not used It is implied that there is affirmative consent because he asked her to get a condom. Why is the standard so low because he is a man?
/r/MensRights28/05/16 04:19 PM
2

We must have zero tolerance for the destructive brotherhood that occurs when men of all ages gather and depend on sexism and misogyny as their common bond. I'm so torn by this article. It paints men as sexist and masculinity as toxic yet addresses a lot of the issued men and boys face.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:51 PM
20

And the original judge apparently made the sentence shorter because the victim wouldn't remember the crime.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:21 PM
15

I've been groped by women but I'm not stupid enough to think all women are that disrespectful.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:22 PM
1

Minority posts that may be trolling should never get a subreddit banned.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:14 PM
6

Get a lawyer. The principal is accusing YOU of lying. Your son is about to get railroaded and expelled.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 03:10 PM
2

How dare you disagree with this guy who has no idea what he's talking about but feels the need to shame you for it anyway?!?!?
/r/MensRights12/05/16 12:44 AM
3

1/6 is closer to 18% than 1/5 is. But we're talking half percentage points here. And that's assuming it's exactly 18%.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:02 AM
2

Darling - stop projecting onto others What is it called when people use a pet name (such as darling, honey, sweetie) to undermine a person? And why is that garbage on this subreddit?
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:00 AM
4

As if you'd know your own argument better than some random poster on reddit.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 11:17 PM
-19

Are we talking about feminists or neckbeard MRAs? Edit: Too many people don't get the comment. We attack feminists for calling MRAs fat neckbeards, yet there is this hypocritical garbage.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 05:48 PM
1

11 hours and no comment?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 06:57 AM
4

I'm treating her the same I would a man. I take a claim of mental incapacity because she couldn't control her libido as an admission of guilt. Which is exactly what I would do for a man.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:17 PM
8

Is she not admitting guilt? This is not a case where she's denying any guilt and getting rail roaded.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:00 PM
1

Forget war movies. Watch any action movie, for example John Wick, and count how many women were killed. I think there was one in John Wick. Which is quite progressive.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:15 AM
2

High school? Try elementary school.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 03:49 PM
10

The 50-50 police recruitment is great! I can't wait for a 50-50 policy in other public services such as nursing. Australia, you so progressive.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:29 PM
2

Wait, you want him to read. An article?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 05:53 AM
2

Yeah, but hiding evidence that casts conviction in doubt is not how the law should work and would have prevented the trial from even happening, as I'm sure you read.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 05:48 AM
2

Well, you can prove anything with facts.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 02:21 PM
2

What your teeny man brain can't understand is that only women can be the victims of sexism because of reasons.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 02:46 PM
5

The fact you view all men as a threat 'really sends a powerful message'.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 04:44 PM
6

I don't doubt that, say, a guy like Ghomeshi is a dirtbag. Why don't you doubt it? Almost everything said against him is being questioned, why not that?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 04:06 PM
4

So apparently the courts agree that simply being an alleged creep and douchebag does not mean you should be convicted of a sex crime.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:06 PM
22

So apparently the courts agree that simply being an alleged creep and douchebag does not mean you should be convicted of a sex crime.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 03:38 PM
16

Also larger crowds. So should a minor league player receive the same amount as a major league player, even if the minor league has less prestige? Only if the minor leaguer is a woman. Don't be an idiot. That's not how equality works.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:09 PM
2

It's women like that these girls learned from. It's sad that every man is just a creep/paedophile in waiting.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:48 PM
1

So this has 40 points yet when you look at Australian statistics (just follow the prostate and breast links), there were projected to be more prostate cancer deaths than breast cancer deaths in 2015. Not that it's a competition. Men are just notoriously bad at going to doctors, so a awareness campaign is definitely a good idea. tl;dr: The above stats are not accurate for Australia, where the pic was taken, however the graphic is accurate.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:57 PM
1

I think they uses the same calculator that record companies use.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 05:55 PM
4

someone thought I wasn’t your daddy.’ And he said, ‘but you are my daddy.’ The sweet innocence of children.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:06 AM
5

So you're saying that it's ok if people quit their jobs to be home makers as long as they keep working another job from home? /r/lifeprotips
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:36 AM
4

It's a class thing.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 05:44 PM
2

Expecting them to pay and accepting them offering to pay is two different things, so let's not make believe to fit our narrative.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 04:32 PM
-2

I like how you say things that morally contradict what the survey says.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 04:30 PM
16

The response is obviously an example of mansplaining.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 04:58 PM
3

I wonder how many cases of female on male domestic abuse is counted as a "brawl" rather than what it is.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 09:23 AM
25

Transphobic?
/r/MensRights17/02/16 05:14 AM
2

It's not basically rape, it's literally statutory rape. Sorry, I don't buy that. Statory rape isn't always rape. How much clearer could I be? I've bolded the key words for you. I quoted the person above me with that part of the sentence. Next time you think about calling statutory rape "rape", I want you to rethink your life choices in who you trust to feed you information for you to blindly regurgitate. You clearly have not had a single thought of your own. Before you insult someone and imply t…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 05:46 PM
6

It's not basically rape, it's literally statutory rape.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 03:22 PM
1

Pressing this weak argument is like Rolling Stone insisting Jackie was raped, in the face of zero supporting evidence. I stopped arguing the point a while back. I actually had to look what the original point even was. What I've seen is that you call yourself a scientist then misuse the term scientific method to aid your argument that consists almost solely of insulting me and almost nothing of any substance. Except for what ice quoted above. Which is again incorrect. There's at least the possibi…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 08:58 AM
1

It could "include" anything, you retard. See why I'm suspicious of your claim than you are a scientist? The fact that you do not even understand the scientific method indicates that you are from Tumblr. Show me a single peer-reviewed study that specifically links media to opinions about men as "dumb or pretty." The scientific method relates to the testing of hypotheses and the collection of data through experimentation, not the use of the data after the fact.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 07:23 PM
-10

I can't tell if you're a pretentious idealist that morally equates stealing a joke from a show and telling minutes before the originator tells it with stealing a joke once someone has stopped telling the joke Or if you do don't possess the mental capacity to differentiate the two. I suspect the former, in which case I'm sad for you.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 11:42 PM
6

Its an argument thats easy to dismantle, because you could argue that under that assumption abortion should be illegal, because the woman agreed to the baby when she decided to have sex. Yeah, but that's different. Checkmate, shitlord.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:37 PM
2

"We women are equal to men in every way, except when it's in any way inconvenient for us."
/r/MensRights07/02/16 04:25 PM
1

It makes complete sense, only women understand what it's like to be a woman, but women totally understand what it's like to be a man. And we're all equal, but women just understand gender issues more.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 05:39 AM
1

You're a scientist who has used gamespot.com as a source. Honestly, if that's the type of scientist you are, you may want to look into a career change. Ignoring the fact that "scientist" is a vague term to begin with and likely indicates you're a college student attempting to complete a science degree. At least I hope so, because otherwise whatever university you ply your trade at is in trouble.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:16 AM
3

I gave you a link talking about the fact that TV affects kids psychosocial development which could include their opinion of men. Which I do not have any direct evidence of at this point. You provided no direct or indirect evidence, just a comparison that is basically a straw man argument. My opinion is that Jack Thompson's opinions are too crazy to compare to this situation, but that you should look at the opinions of those who believe video games may desensitize which are less crazy, but again …
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:27 PM
12

I cited a few messages down.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:10 PM
8

You're equating making people kill with clouding people's opinion of men. The more accurate comparison is that video games desensitize kids to violence. Which is completely different.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:08 PM
7

Just to be clear, I'm not arguing what TV is teaching children about men and women, but I am arguing that if TV is teaching children that men are dumb, this will affect their world view. I then provided evidence that TV does affect a child's world view. Other than a study which looks at this exact question, there is nothing more I can do.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:42 PM
16

He's saying that television influences a kid's understanding of the world Like how murder is wrong? Please. Provide some actual evidence to back this claim. Other than the "society made me do it" argument. Every generation of parents since forever claims some new fangled thing is "ruining" children. I never said it ruined children, I said it influenced their understand of the world. An article from Paediatrics and Child Health states: The influence of the media on the psychosocial development of…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:21 PM
59

Well that's a straw man argument of I've ever seen one. He's saying that television influences a kid's understanding of the world, just like a video game can to a lesser extent.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:33 PM
4

It's not a problem because men are stupid. It's a problem because children often learn things from television. But you're so smart that you already knew this.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:30 PM
31

Ryerson? Backwards? I'm stunned.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:13 AM
7

who boasted after the verdict that his tweets were “within the law,” How dare he boast about his innocence.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:03 AM
10

Guilty if proven innocent.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 08:43 AM
4

I use quotations because it barely qualifies as a joke.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 01:42 AM
7

No. But if I saw someone "jokingly" encouraging someone to murder another person, I'd think the original person was an idiot. Especially if they kept trying to defend their view point with shitty logic.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 11:00 PM
17

Encouraging someone to rape someone is not a joke. Also, jokes require humor.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 09:01 PM
1

You're saying the definition of sex and gender you are quoting is now in correct. And you're not a troll?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:14 PM
0

While the difference between sex and gender has fuck all to do with this discussion, the medical definitions of sex and gender this user is suggesting are correct and he should not get downvoted for this post. This user should get downvoted for their other posts.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 08:37 AM
-4

If raping females were a slap on the wrist crime, I suspect the number of unscrupulous men in the world would rise. I completely ignored the rest of your post, but don't project your sociopathic feelings on all men. Rape isn't wrong because it's illegal, it's wrong because it's wrong.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 01:40 PM
1

Mostly irreversible, as in almost not reversible at all.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:48 PM
1

I'm glad that you don't discount male issues because you've experienced sexist attitudes. It's not common.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 08:42 PM
1

There are some pros and cons to both sides. But I wouldn't forget that the other side suffers. That's my point, I guess.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 03:17 PM
1

By the state.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 03:16 PM
3

Real problems that women do face in the US relate to (reasonable) access to abortion. It's less of an issue in Canada. In Ireland, it's illegal. So women can be forced into parenthood indirectly. It's not an oppression Olympics, but we need to acknowledge that both can suffer.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:22 AM
2

Most people didn't notice or give a shit.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:56 AM
1

Well they are paedophiles!
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:55 PM
14

I doubt she will because she still implies women are the victims.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:12 PM
2

False. This is not a man, this is a male abuser who punched a woman in the face just for kicks and eventually drove her to rob a store by his mere existence. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:40 PM
7

I'd argue with you, but I've already used my daily quota of words.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 06:46 PM
5

You can't have your cake and eat it too. We'll, really, you can. You just have to buy two cakes.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 06:25 PM
39

Tired meme: Weeeoo Weeeoo. Bro, did they just remove bro because they were sexist enough to think that women couldn't be bros? We do not have time for these sexist ideas.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 06:24 PM
21

Absolutely sexist. Competition is misogyny.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:19 AM
5

Anyone who thinks men get to be "whole people" at all times has obviously never been a man and probably never known one either. Are you saying that women need to... check their privilege?
/r/MensRights20/09/15 05:29 AM
46

So you think all women are stupid?
/r/MensRights18/09/15 09:52 PM
4

No man is going to tell me what I do with my body!
/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:46 PM
9

I find that offensive. You are a misogynist pig.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 04:59 PM
36

If people some get the sarcasm with "lalalalalalalala" then I don't want their upvotes.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:20 PM
85

Lalalalalalalala. I'm not listening. You're comparing men to women. It's all about "teh menz". Always making everything about the man. Women. Are the victims here. The woman was forced by society to have sex with the student and then HE took advantage of her vulnerability. HE should be jailed.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 01:52 PM
1

This is the 10% there, buddy.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 01:43 PM
6

I think the point here is that something rather innocuous is a huge issue that made a company bend over backward because a single person was offended. Honestly, they should just put all the bad things in the men's section and the good in the women's and be done with it.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 06:48 PM
5

The author of this article is the type of woman I always avoided when I was single and I encourage others to do the same. If she expects you to pamper her at the start, it will never end.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:46 PM
6

Well men do. They get to work all the outdoor, physical jobs while women are forced to work indoors without even breaking a sweat. It's pure misogyny.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:06 PM
2

Why are people surprised? Didn't you know that blue-haired nose-pierced asshole feminists" are a protected class?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:31 PM
3

just waiting for the social justice of feminism to somehow "trickle down" to men, in prisons and on the streets, ain't gonna cut it for them. That's a great point. It's trickle down social justice. It doesn't work, except for those at the top. Because they don't share.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:03 PM
1

Someone at a voice for men or other pro-male site should write an open letter to the media, challenging them to call statutory rape what it is. They do. Look at the Jared Fogel situation. Wait, you meant when women are the perpetrators? Ha, the boys wanted it!
/r/MensRights21/08/15 12:43 AM
11

I'd sponsor that. "Female teachers, you have the power to change. Stop raping your underage, impressionable students." The goal here is to stop teachers of both sexes from committing rape, obviously.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 03:13 AM
2

A page of writing, zero citations. You question how I got my numbers, but you provide none. The US is notorious for superfluous testing to drive up billing costs. That's my last comment.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:33 AM
0

If you want my rebuttal to your statement, please read the second paragraph of my original response. I said that what you said is bullshit then supported it with evidence (the high infant mortality rates and the low life expectancy per dollar in the US). If you're suggesting that supporting a statement with evidence is a copy/pasta, I obviously have no idea what these phrase means. A single quote mocking you is not a strawman argument if it is followed by an actual argument. I was just mocking y…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 02:06 AM
1

It's cheaper per capita for similar outcomes. Either politicians are genius business men (Who eschewed making millions in favor of the public good), you are getting lesser quality, or it's being financed by debt. If you are saying it's cheaper than the US, that is only because we are still developing medical technology and you aren't (so we are subsidizing you) and also there is a lot of state-corporate corruption here. "Nuh, uh. The US has the best care." The cost of American health care is hig…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:25 AM
72

Haha, it's so cute when women commit felonies. But it's ok, the guys deserve it. They cheated.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:21 AM
3

Don't men know their place? They should do what women want, and then go back to the job site.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 11:04 PM
9

You should shut up and man up.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:28 AM
5

It's always this way. Men are monsters, women make mistakes.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 05:38 PM
2

You don't owe me a thing. But your lack of any substance is telling.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 12:21 AM
8

If you can't even link to your prior argument, forgive me for thinking that you have none. I'm asking you for an example or an argument and what you provide is excuses.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 06:42 PM
2

"Women make me sick" would likely get a huge response of calling the person a sexist. This very anything.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:03 PM
12

Ok, so just to be clear, there is no argument or evidence?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 03:57 PM
11

Now why is that?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 03:50 PM
2

Oh, do me, do me!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:52 PM
-4

You know who else was a feminist? Hitler!
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:54 AM
18

The only way courts change is if public perception changes. It's just like any rights movement.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:03 PM
2

In my experience, some women already have huge bags that unnecessarily take up extra seats on public transit. Wasn't manspreading just about distracting attention from that?
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:01 PM
-5

I must comment you for your skill in straw men arguments. Bringing up the Rotherham sexual assaults/rapes to imply I support them takes this to another level. I am definitely not as skilled a debater as you are. This I readily admit. Your skill with straw men, does not make you correct. Additionally, playing the victim card because you don't like what I say about you, right after you accuse me of basically supporting rape. That's another gold star. Now I'm not saying that there is NEVER a power …
/r/MensRights18/07/15 07:17 PM
-1

Proper etiquette in eastern Europe is women staying home while men work. The man is the provider, the woman the caregiver. This stems from that inherently sexist society. Both sides suffer for different reasons.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:07 PM
3

I've seen it happen, but only among friends. I feel the two of you are discussing two different situations: general society and friends.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:05 PM
-8

I'd argue the fact you even see any difference between gay and straight marriage other than there is two of the same sexual organ in one and one of each on the other type of marriage makes your views bigoted. Ding, ding, ding - we have a winner! The ironic part in all of this is that you presume I am opposed to SSM without once asking me for my viewpoint. To even discuss the topic is to be accused of 'bigotry.' Does this remind you of anything? Frankly, I don't give a shit about you explaining y…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:01 PM
-4

Theoretically, you're correct, but you're ignoring reality. If a man/women grooms their kid so they can fuck them, that is hugely wrong. If a society is set up so an old guy/woman marries a bunch of children, that is wrong. These are situations that HAVE happened and are wrong. For the same reason it's wrong for a teacher to fuck their students. Morally, there is zero difference between straight and gay relationships, as they are two consenting adults. If you mentally abuse someone into a relati…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:29 PM
-6

The reason incest and polygamy are illegal is that historically, the situation includes one person who is being taken advantage of.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:10 PM
12

Men have rights. Unless a woman's rights gets in the way.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:04 PM
6

Took 30 seconds of googling. There are differences between the man and the woman in this case.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 01:48 PM
1

I'd much rather a wide range of people see this and be shown it's WRONG, than for this person to be kicked out of whatever program she's in. She talks like this because society not only allows it, society encourages it.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:55 AM
3

You're making excuses. There should be no reason why you as a man cannot advocate causes because of your gender unless you do so on supposition that you're doing so as a anti-feminist MRA. No where did I say my sex stopped me from anything. I said that me questioning why male rape didn't get any attention, at all, got me pushed out. And I don't mean I sat around demanding why this was the case from the get go. I slowly noticed this and would ask question here and make a a sarcastic comment here.…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 04:17 PM
3

I'll just leave this here For the record, I started as a feminist and was pushed out because I dared to ask about drunk men being taken advantage of by women and why men can't suffer from sexism when there are objective examples of this. I think it's the toxic minority of feminists that will stop them from working with us. We are the oppressors afterall. We couldn't possibly be opposed.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 03:49 PM
1

It's the last line of her article.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 10:45 PM
1

Oh, don't be such a faggot.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:35 PM
3

If you keep this up, I'm gonna have to cut you off.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:52 PM
9

Sometimes, the /s is unnecessary.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:52 PM
2

A day per person. Seems fair.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 02:23 PM
34

Those babies need to man up.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:21 PM
6

You're getting downvoted for the first part of your comment.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:09 PM
1

If you replace gender with sex in the left one, it makes more sense. And reflects reality. Then they wouldn't be mutuality exclusive.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 04:51 PM
1

"When in other countries men can get away with rape." Am I the only one seeing this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:59 AM
35

Anti MRAs would EVER do that and suggesting that is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:10 PM
2

The irony of this comment is astounding. Here we are watching a video about how Western feminists completely ignore huge problems in favour of minor bullshit and you're completely ignoring a huge problem... in favour of minor bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:34 AM
1

Niiiiiice
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:23 AM
12

It fucking astounds me how completely unaware they are of this kind of shit, and SOME OF THEM ARE MEN FFS! Stupid comes in every sex and race.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:06 PM
0

The issue here isn't that a guy wasn't let into the bike shop. The issue is that a day where no men are allowed into the shop is called "safe". That's appalling.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:08 AM
13

I hate that these are referred to as "male standards". They are army ranger standards.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:51 PM
2

Ask a Canadian when their version of the Constitution was written. None would consider that their Constitution. Because it's not.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 06:18 AM
2

We've only had one civil war yet it was enough to influence your founding fathers when they were writing up your version of the constitution. Yeah, our founding father's didn't write up our the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Because they were long dead by 1982. Thanks for proving my point that you're ignorant, eh.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:11 AM
2

Free speech has nothing to do with getting fired for saying stupid shit, even in America.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:02 PM
2

Free speech has nothing to do with getting fired for saying stupid shit, even in America.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:02 PM
8

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realize that you spoke with a Canadian and are now an expert at Canada.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:57 AM
22

I've was corresponding with one about men's rights and how if affected Canada. I met a Canadian who lacked a back bone, therefore, all Canadians are pussies. I met an ignorant, unintelligent American, therefore, all Americans are idiots. Good logic.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:34 AM
13

WTF does Planned Parenthood have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:19 PM
12

Fuck what dad wanted. Fuck what mom wanted. Why don't we care what the kid wants?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:50 AM
1

The law has not changed any time recently.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 04:14 AM
23

You're correct. Men are used for strength. The fact that far lesser shots are given for these slaves is because they are men.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:45 PM
1

This attitude
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:29 PM
7

It's one thing to have sex with a former student one they're of age. Creepy, but acceptable when you really think about it. It's a different thing to have your eye on underage students you plan on fucking once the school year is done. That's a bit gross.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:24 PM
1

He never said he had a college education, just that he's been around the same college campus. Also, he's not making an argument, he's sharing his experience.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:03 PM
15

The only time the man's rights are not trampled is when another man's rights are trampled.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 02:43 PM
1

It's less than five years, by the way.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 02:34 PM
1

You're getting downvoted more for your arrogant attitude than anything.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:10 PM
3

Excuse us for doubting you when you say that someone's going to get sued for posting an imgur photo which is a screenshot of a discussion and an obvious clip of a newspaper article. Also, you're kind of an asshole. You're not doing this as a favour, you're doing this to toot your own horn.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:00 PM
12

Any time a guy says that women are all cheating sluts, we rip on them and call them TRPers. I see no reason not to be harsh on women who see all men as potential rapists. Both groups are sexist as shit.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:56 PM
14

Yeah. But since when are men human?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:33 PM
5

Oh tumblr feminists. Or as they should be known: the true source of rape culture by which everything is rape so the word is devalued to the point where looking at someone is discussed in the same sentence as rape.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:47 PM
6

If no one considers any of the violence you have suffered as violence, then how is any data on violence even remotely accurate?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:00 PM
14

People talk about internalized misogyny all the time. Is what you're explaining not internalized misandry? And I don't say that to insult you. It just seems to be what others claim the other way around.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:58 PM
6

So she could potentially be criminal. So what you're saying in the title is right. You're accusing her of criminal conduct. Or at least whoever created the petition is.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:15 PM
12

I don't know about the UK, but inciting violence against people (ie kill purple people vs fuck purple people) is NOT protected by free speech laws in Canada. Because there are reasonable limitations to free speech and the safety of others is one of those limitations.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:11 PM
6

The only people saying MRAs care about this movie are the same people slamming MRAs. There are many movies that perpetuate stereotypes. Action movies are the biggest offenders, if it is even an offence, because they tend to be irreverent and simple. People are grasping at straws.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:11 AM
11

Not to MURDER their kids.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:59 PM
9

If the people you consider to be feminists don't identify as feminists, and those that you don't do identify as feminists, there is a problem.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:18 AM
2

It depends on the industry. Usually, it's a cop out. Companies don't give a fuck about employees anymore, so they're just replaceable. In some industries, the guy would HAVE to be fired.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:03 AM
1

The problem with society these days is that saying something like that about men is good advice, but the equivalent about women would be patriarchy and overt sexism.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:03 PM
13

You're being so naive, it's almost endearing. The fact she didn't allow them entry isn't going to stop them from saying she did. You think they're going to admit to breaking the rules in writing?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:01 PM
30

This sounds pretty far fetched. Police cannot enter a home without permission or a warrant What are you talking about? They had permission. Just read their report where she allowed them onto the premises. Facts don't matter. What the police say/write matters.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:54 PM
7

It'd funny, I usually vote with my brain.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 02:10 PM
0

Yet boys don't respect men who don't have jobs. Man work, woman care.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:49 PM
10

Source: Sister is a neuropsych major and hopes to get into Med School. My dad was also a psych major and is now a surgeon. Your dad lived in a different time. And your sister may get disappointed.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 02:45 PM
74

You're saying actual work earns more money? Stop the presses. Also, psychology majors.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:43 AM
21

What the fuck what a movie star know about prejudice?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:49 PM
1

She's right, though. There were perceived benefits. She made the best choice with the information she had then. That doesn't fix things though, but that's where she's coming from.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:13 PM
12

Well what did he expect being dressed like that?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:02 AM
0

I get the analogy. I'm saying the analogy is fucked up. That's the point. The word intentionally degrades women to the level of animals which is fucked up. And you are supporting it.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:31 PM
1

She's am animal now? Yeah, that's not fucked up. At all. There's a battle for public opinion and you guys are defending stupid ass comments like this. Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:09 PM
10

Special status Equality Fucking pick ONE.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:30 AM
2

It's likely the lies.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:23 AM
-3

Using a word generally reserved for objects, like shoes, is kind of fucked up.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:40 AM
-2

I'd say it's a fundamental difference.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:27 AM
-5

When they say they broke her in. That's what I have a problem with. Not the action, what they called it.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:26 AM
-1

Fortunately, you're the minority here. That's not what we're about.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:16 AM
36

No I broke her in That's a fucked up comment if I ever saw one. Thanks for the update though, you left us hanging.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:17 PM
4

So you left her? You're not to clear on that.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:52 PM
2

Jo Brand She's funny, but her constant misandry makes me wonder whether it's a joke or not. And I can't remember who called her on it early in the show's history.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:13 PM
1

God damn do I hate seeing this stupid collection of pictures that is completely cherry picked.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:55 PM
3

Well, that's obviously due to the anti-female bias of Reddit.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:27 PM
1

If you're writing an op ed piece, you should never have anonymity. It serves no purpose.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 05:56 AM
1

So you'd like them to censor. Like we try to stop feminists from doing? Gold star.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:18 AM
7

We don't call male circumcision "male genital mutilation" like we call female circumcision. And we don't call a man bring beaten by his wife domestic abuse all that often, it's usually him getting what he deserved.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:44 PM
5

It's a fucking sexual hate crime.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 02:28 PM
3

You're wrong. I'm right. Third party here. I'm going to have to disagree with you. The guy used a less than stellar example, but that does not disprove his point and that does not prove your point. If he had said it's common sense to own a lot of winter clothing in Alaska, but not in Miami, it'd be a better example. Also, "You're wrong. I'm right."? What an arrogant douche.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:25 PM
2

Usually it's good form to not repost something that was both on /r/bestof and crossposted to this sub within the last week.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:11 AM
1

If they choose to follow certain behaviors and those behaviors don't harm other around them and women choosing what they wear certainly doesn't harm others, who cares. Being expelled from the pool for being make, while not huge, is harmful. So this is not a completely victimless situation.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:19 PM
45

I'm not going to lie, I think that both men and women are victimized here. Men, because they're categorically expelled from the pool with no reciprocation. Women, because religion brainwashes them into thinking that wearing a bathing suit is immodest in the year 2015.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 03:31 AM
8

"You're pretty well spoken... for a black." Not in this fucking lifetime, pal.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:37 AM
2

Once your graduate, I'd send this to the Dean in the form of a letter, compete with your sources.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 11:55 PM
5

One man beats a woman and is given a 30 year sentence : "THIS IS PROOF OF MISOGYNY! RAPE CULTURE!" Three women burn, cut and torture a man in a premeditated attack and avoid jail : "..... Still proof of misogyny!" FTFY
/r/MensRights17/03/15 10:39 PM
9

Why are they made into chicken flicks, where this plain, obsessive chick gets Mr. Dreamboat. Yet if it was a plain obsessive dude, it would be creepy. Anyways, that's the end of my rant. Would love to know where you all stand. In 40 Days and 40 Nights, Josh Hartnett is raped while literally chained to a bed and he has to be for the girl back. How fucked up is that?
/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:51 PM
1

Ignorance is knowledge. Weakness is power.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:41 PM
8

Yeah. Women get repeatedly groped at a party by five people without a white night stepping in. Unlikely.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:18 PM
6

Targeting single line responses is the correct place to start pointing that out.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:41 PM
33

But it's different. She's a woman.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:04 PM
0

Well, you can prove anything with facts.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:16 PM
20

If my meal sucks / I am annoyed, I won't tip People should live up to their responsibilities and own their actions How in the world do you not see that these two ideas are completely incompatible with each other? It's almost like you're making this up for kicks, in the same comment you suggest that the post above is a false flag operation. No you're asking yourself, how are these not compatible? Well, if you believe in owning up to your actions, passive aggressively not tipping, without telling …
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:50 AM
3

Which is easy to ascertain.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:19 AM
4

Weren't those like 5 separate straw man arguments?
/r/MensRights17/02/15 11:16 PM
9

Innocent of rape? I don't think so, they were accused which is all the proof I need.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 10:13 PM
1

It makes sense that a child wouldn't be exposed to an adult that shares them.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 08:10 AM
6

Going beyond the issue of equilibrium and striving to end persisting double standards, sometimes a little chivalry is just nice. That belief doesn’t render me anti-feminist, but rather a girl who appreciates a truly nice boy. I therefore feel somewhat qualified to say there is, without a doubt, nothing more charming or alluring than a truly kind gentlemanly soul amidst a sea of increasingly horrible male specimen. "I am a feminist. We are all equal, but men should treat women in a special manner…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 02:56 PM
6

I'm a feminist and hated this 'article.' I couldn't even get to the end. I understand why, when you read things like this, you could hate this woman's idea of feminism. However please know there are plenty of us out there that think nothing like this. When 99% of the articles are written like this and 99% of feminists think like this, it won't be long until you see the reality of the situation.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 02:14 PM
0

You know, you're right. I've never seen a man let down a man. Ever. And there definitely aren't countless examples of that in reddit.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:09 AM
1

Since others aren't saying it, I'll say it. It's all your own fault and you deserve to have a little negativity to teach you a couple valuable lessons about trusting any woman and going on vacation without any adequate resources saved and on your person to cover the entire cost of the trip should your benefactor flake out. Any person.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 05:19 AM
5

I'm sure there are some women glad they were circumcised, but that doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:12 AM
1

Even today, WWI is rightly regarded as one of the most horrific things to ever have happened to the human race. Wouldn't you know it? Only HALF of the men and (frankly) teenage boys who fought in that war had the right to vote. Karen could have basically ended the debate right there. You overstate the importance of this quite a bit.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:09 AM
2

Wouldn't they frame that as just plain old rape?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:24 PM
5

another where a man accidentally date raped a woman. How is this possible?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:02 PM
1

Feelings >> democracy
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:50 AM
4

Postpartum psychosis is one of the rarest psychiatric disorders, yet it is almost always considered a psychiatric emergency because of the rapid onset of severe maternal symptoms and the potential for a catastrophic outcome, such as infanticide or suicide. I'll just leave this here. The one thing that infuriates me is that men are rarely thought of as mentally ill and mostly thought of as angry criminals.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:34 AM
3

If femnism is about undermining patriarchy, which is inherently male dominance, then for a man to be a feminist, he would understand that it is about women putting themselves first in order to raise their gender to equal status. A man cannot be a feminist, and then put men first, it is illogical. So what you're saying is that before there is equality, women need to get theirs? That actually makes sense. Men should shut the fuck up, man up and allow women go benefit from the centuries of back-pay…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 02:03 AM
76

She ignores individual sexim/racism because it's convenient and easy.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 09:22 PM
1

The hate us cause they anus!
/r/MensRights25/01/15 09:20 PM
7

This RedPill/PUA thing. All the energy we spend on going to the gym just to get laid. What a waste of energy! Sure, you might get laid, that's cool. Congratulations, 10-20 years from now you will have all the skills to become a trophy-husband. It's not wrong to work out. Guys need to move. School is a killer for your body. But seriously, hitting the gym 2-3 days a week, 1-2 hours per session, is probably sufficient. Why lump these two groups together? Does it not piss you off when MRAs are group…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 06:27 PM
3

Affirmative consent is going to break the world or feminism's monopolistic hold on academia.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 08:21 AM
1

The word abuse or any other forms of it appears once in her article. "Abusive husband". I know she had an epiphany, but she still doesn't acknowledge what she is.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:08 PM
16

They only do so because of patriarchy. So, really, men should be taxed more.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:56 PM
6

I played with Transformers like it was my job. I'm now in health care.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:44 PM
-2

So you want an innocent man to fight a wrongful accusation by punishing many other innocent people? How moronic.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 03:03 PM
10

You see, men should just man up and take it.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 09:09 PM
1

If he was beating up other students and she had to step in. I don't agree, but I can at least think of situations. I'm not that blind.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:36 PM
2

Bank accounts don't have rights.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:27 PM
1

So we shouldn't change the law to punish rapists because they might get abortions? And abortions ate bad because people want to adopt children? This like of thinking is scary.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:21 PM
11

Feminists saying that no woman would ever falsely accuse a man of rape is based on the belief that they would never do it. That's like me arguing that rape won't ever happen because I would never do it.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 09:21 AM
6

How things have changed in the last year.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:36 PM
2

Yeah, you can think whatever you want. I don't have to abide by your judgement.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:11 AM
1

I gave them the last decade to do so. But in all honesty, I'd probably just pay and things would just not progress any further. I don't care if it's not fair.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 05:20 AM
0

If someone is on autopilot about something as basic as dating decency, they're going to disappoint me in so many other ways.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 05:15 AM
2

I don't disagree that you shouldn't be going to an expensive restaurant and expecting someone else to split the bill. If I'm going on a date with a woman that is so entitled she didn't even being money to dinner, then I frankly couldn't care less what she thought of social norms. Or me for that matter. She ain't seeing me again. (I know people forget their wallets, etc, etc, but that's not what I'm talking about here)
/r/MensRights27/12/14 05:10 AM
5

Yes, if you hate her then that's what you should do. But if you hold her personally responsible for the expectations set by every other man and woman then you're a little bit of an ass yourself. I hold her personally responsible for her own beliefs. And if she believes I should pay, unless I specifically told her I'd treat her to dinner, then I can judge her as harshly as I want.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 06:36 PM
12

You just pay your portion and never speak to her again. It's quite simple.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 05:57 PM
-1

So a post from 11 minutes ago being posted 5 minutes ago? Are you kidding me? Obviously OP has two accounts and is trolling with one.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:37 PM
1

Wait, the woman was responsible? Am I the only one that thought a guy was based on the initial reports.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 07:24 AM
1

Polly Neate, chief executive of Women's Aid, said: "We hope this new law will lead to a real culture change, so that every woman experiencing control can get the support she needs to break free safely." sigh Apparently only men are abusers.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:23 AM
1

The fact that the poster above you deleted their post is proof of censorship on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:20 AM
8

Hatred only breeds further hatred. False. Hate also leads to suffering.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 05:43 PM
1

See below.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 09:24 PM
5

Ding ding, we have a winner. I used a Jimmy Carr joke as the vehicle, but you're dead on. How could one be arrested for beating their own boyfriend. He's theirs!
/r/MensRights13/12/14 09:23 PM
5

Well you can prove anything with facts.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 06:14 PM
4

Thanks for sharing. That was an interesting read.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 06:12 PM
4

Collective consciousness, maaaaan, we all remember.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 06:08 PM
3

Just some bruises and scratches? Man up! /s
/r/MensRights13/12/14 06:03 PM
9

Yeah, that's bullshit. It's like getting charged with keying hour own car. It's YOUR car!
/r/MensRights13/12/14 06:02 PM
1

Suggesting that we shouldn't know things is pretty fucking scary. Concern trolling doesn't make an argument more valid.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 06:08 AM
1

I don't think I said anything in regards to downplaying any sort of information. I think that's the internal bias you might have. You may he right. I in no way mean to downplay anything. I guess it's similar to the pop psychology idea that women apparently attempt suicide more as a cry for help while men attempt it less but succeed more. Or something like that. People have used that information in a wide variety of ways, like to make women out to be babies and men out to be more practical which …
/r/MensRights08/12/14 05:55 AM
0

It's because you come off as downplaying the information that is here by asking for more, even if that wasn't your intent. While getting more information on anything is important, some judgements can be made even with incomplete information.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:21 PM
3

My argument is that it's stupid to judge people based on results while ignoring intent. How are we saying anything different?
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:18 PM
0

Who cares who tapes harder. It's who gets raped that's the point. And I'm asking for clarity because the quoted sentence is nonsensical.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 07:17 PM
-1

Just so we're clear, you're saying that a single punch is less severe than a bunch of slaps? Regardless of who throws them?
/r/MensRights07/12/14 07:15 PM
2

No? It's not rating. Are we trying to ignore parts of this issue to "stick it" to the "enemy"? It's part of the issue of domestic violence. Why not ask the question. That men punch harder than women? It is you who is ignoring things, and that's that women are more likely to use a weapon which balances the odds. The same shit happens when feminists bring up rape statistics regarding women. A man brings to male statistics and is met with the same stupid reaction. That men rape harder? I'm not sure…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:46 PM
12

Is it though? Are we going to start rating physical abuse? It doesn't count until you use X amount of force? And my point in the ability to take a punch is also valid. A big guy who's been in fights could take a punch in the face easier than I could. That doesn't make it any less abusive.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:27 PM
1

Also, 2 hours of displeasure > a lifetime of never being able to get a job or hold a family You are completely missing the point here. The effects of rape fat out last the physical effects.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:24 PM
32

I wonder if there is a comparison between the rate at which it is possible to occur and the intensity. And there were have it. Women abusing men isn't as important because they don't hit as hard. Why not take it further. Why not get a comparison between the rate at which it happens and people's ability to take a punch? Because if you know how to take a punch, it's not as bad.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:19 PM
1

I have this feeling that there may just be a hint of sarcasm in this comment.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 09:52 AM
2

The math is quite simple. Moustache = -3 hot, 3 creep Beard = -1 hot, 0 creep Moustache and beard = 3 hot (-3 -1), 0 creep (3 0)
/r/MensRights04/12/14 05:15 PM
1

Because there are other bad things, I should ignore this current bad thing. Logic checks out.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:26 AM
1

Right, because someone's wife wouldn't have their password. Unless they're already in the middle of a divorce.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:21 AM
2

Well that settles it. It's not like she could borrow his phone while he's not paying attention and upload them right then and there.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 03:45 PM
8

Alcohol cannot be used as a defense for men. Great point. You are responsible for all actions even if you are passed out. Uhhhhhh...
/r/MensRights30/11/14 06:45 PM
5

He brings up a good point, you bring up an ad hominem. Thank you for your contribution.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 10:31 PM
1

I agree. The fact that he did not deny these accusations that have not been made is suspicious. It's like Glenn Beck won't deny that he raped and murdered a girl in 1990.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 06:51 AM
21

The actions the university took IS a huge deal. Collective punishment of a crime that wasn't reported, by a guy that may have been in a frat.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 06:47 AM
12

If she became manic after being treated for "depression" then she was mistreated for bipolar disorder, which is not mentioned at all.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 04:17 AM
4

It's one thing to make a joke about rape as a concept. It's tasteless, but you're not laughing at a particular person's suffering. However, to laugh at someone being raped, that's no joke. That's literally laughing at someone getting raped.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 09:43 PM
2

I got into an argument with several feminists (all backing each other up, of course) earlier today in which they legitimately, with a straight face, claimed that a man judging the clothing a woman is wearing is exactly the same as him saying she deserves to be raped. Dear God... How many feminists have said this guy deserves to be raped then? Those monsters.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:36 PM
-1

Government, corporations and media all believe that these vocal straw feminists are representative of what feminism actually is. And feminists actively refuse to correct them! This is the only paragraph in this long winded retort that states or pretends to state active action of feminists, rather than actions taken by corporations and governments. And it's not even an example of active actions. Receiving or being subjected to an action without responding or initiating an action in return is quit…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:42 AM
1

I just would have said that she soars on video to be doing it.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:21 AM
-6

Yet by calling themselves feminists but not speaking out against those who claim to speak for them, they are not just associating themselves with the women who do this kind of thing, but they are actively giving them support. TIL Muslims not denouncing ISIS are actively supporting them. You say the work active, but I'm just not sure you understand what it means.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 02:42 PM
13

The woman who allegedly hit Peña with her stiletto boot Do you still say allegedly when there is video evidence?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:13 AM
3

Obviously America, the male utopia.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 03:21 PM
1

The last time it wasn't was Watergate.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 07:25 AM
2

He's educating someone about their biases. He already want going to date them. He didn't get offended. Who exactly are you saying is getting offended? As for improving men's lives, it's always a good idea to highlight bias. She probably didn't even think of it until he pointed this out. Assuming this isn't faked.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:44 PM
4

Dude, your logic is completely hostile. YOU HATE WOMEN!!
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:50 AM
19

Because the guy SHOULD be grovelling at the alter of woman.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:49 AM
14

Men wouldn't even be allowed to feel bad. People still look at me funny when I ask why it's funny to say that a man who was beaten by a woman did something to deserve it. Gender roles are alive and well.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 08:26 PM
1

It's not just English women. It's also English men.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 08:20 PM
5

More evidence of the censorship on this subreddit! Literally Hitler.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:47 PM
10

[Downvotes ahoy. Fucking movement made up of anti-intellectuals, I tell ya] You're being downvoted for your arrogant tone and mental gymnastics As an example, you give feminists a free pass on the white feather campaign because only half of them supported it. Then you talk about how conscription is men's fault because men voted for it in Parliament. I'm sure a whole lot more than half the men remaining in the country were against that.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 06:07 PM
9

No matter what you do, women are the victims! And now you finally understand you stupid fucking shitlord.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 07:49 PM
3

Just last week I was having a discussion about a guy being beaten by his girlfriend and someone laughed about what they must have done to deserve it. I brought up the fact that no person deserves abuse. And that the "what they did to deserve it" argument had been used against rape victims forever. That ended the laughter and hopefully changed some opinions. The person in question I would otherwise consider a good person.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 07:17 PM
1

It's the same line of thinking that blames teachers for them giving kids a failing grade. Nothing was or should be given, it must be earned.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 12:03 AM
11

Have you ever talked to women before? What do you expect when to sound like? Chances are this girl has said the same thing to multiple dudes and has rehearsed it. Like a pick up line.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 11:24 PM
15

I've experienced such attention. So while it could have been fake, there's really no evidence to discredit it's validity.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 11:10 PM
8

What I read is that despite being a lying piece of shit, Witt is right mostly by accident.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:21 AM
8

It isn't that they learned differently it is that they didn't learn from having three parents in jail. Holy crap, it is a hard knock life.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:25 AM
1

It's comments like this, angry and nonsensical, that give this place a bad reputation. I understand this as people making ad-hominem attacks to try to give "this place" a bad reputation. Usually a sign that their argument has ran it's course and they can't defend it any longer. Moving goal posts, strawmanning, circular reasoning, and otherwise going off on irrelevant tangents are also common. If you see these comments often enough, you may want to ask yourself why. There were no moving goal post…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:07 AM
1

And someone who stands to pee will take less time Men take much less time even if they sit to pee. And yet if men spent as much money as women trying to raise their social status with fancy clothes, they'd likewise piss all over themselves if they tried to go standing up. This is also part of the reason why this is a rich American woman problem and not a rest-of-the-world problem. It's about clothing and makeup. It's comments like this, angry and nonsensical, that give this place a bad reputatio…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:21 PM
1

I've never claimed they were so don't use me as a surrogate for feminists.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:13 PM
1

Women go more often, so they need more time per year than a man does. This is a fact.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:12 PM
1

It's because their sphincter muscle goes around their vaginas.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:12 PM
1

Yet what I'm saying is that 10 women pee more often than 10 men and there most definitely is a biological reason for that. And someone who stands to pee will take less time than someone who doesn't, but not that much. I agree that society has made women also take longer, but they take longer. I really don't care why.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:11 PM
0

I've been quite consistent. They need more bathroom time because they go more often. That's biological. Then toy can factor in the societal garbage you seem to be obsessed with.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:00 AM
0

Who fucking cares? Women need more bathroom time per person than men. Are we just going to ignore that fact?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:36 AM
10

I'm going to call bullshit on that one. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24425-universal-law-of-urination-found-in-mammals.html Physically it exactly the same amount of time for any mammal to piss. But some do it instantaneously wherever they stand without giving it a second thought, others spend minutes taking off ridiculous layers of clothing, perfuming their groins, checking their phones, and doing their makeup. Yet in humans, the only mammals thag have a reason to hold it, men can hold …
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:33 AM
39

I'm pragmatic. Women need more restrooms, whether it's a societal reason or not. Giving men 1/3 the restrooms is completely unacceptable.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:22 AM
76

Women do use the toilet more, seeing as they have poorer control of their bladders. Men also don't have periods. 2:1 is bloody ridiculous, though.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:44 PM
1

It's equality because it's balancing an imbalance from decades ago. Or some stupid shit like that.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 01:58 PM
24

I'd like to remind everyone the RCMP found no evidence of abuse. To the point the RCMP had an internal review of their handling of the case. So either they were so incompetent that they missed obvious abuse, or there's something missing in her story.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:48 PM
1

Sarcasm? When I italicized the word "subtlety" regarding a comment that was obviously a rip off of a famous saying from one of George Orwell's most famous books? No sarcasm. At all.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:19 PM
1

I'm glad you picked up on that subtlety.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:58 PM
1

Of course, it's possible that abortion is still the appropriate action to take, but still, you have to admit...you're killing something. Do you really, though? If you asked 100 what bring alive was, I find it hard to believe that definition would include how a fetus exists inside its mother.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:43 PM
3

men bad; women good. Men Bad; Women Good! MEN BAD; WOMEN GOOD!!! MEN BAD; WOMEN GOOD!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:30 AM
1

Your original comment: Can we not be politically correct jackasses every time someone points out statistically accurate observations about a race. 100% full of shit. There's a statistic I can stand behind.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:12 AM
5

Um, care to provide some statistics?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:42 PM
14

In other words, feminists are about female supremacy, NOT equality. Well, the ones you're describing at least.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 11:20 PM
2

No movement should become an echo chamber of extreme ideas and harbor and protect bigots who hold extremist views. My biggest fear about this place.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:21 PM
4

Keep in mind that finding like minded people doesn't protect people from being bigoted. If every woman you've been in contact with long term says you're a sexist, make sure that you don't use the MHRM to excuse your bigotry like some feminists do.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 12:30 AM
1

This is similar to the stats that show single mothers being terrible for child outcomes and single fathers being wonderful for child outcomes. It's not that dads are inherently better. Only the best dads get custody to begin with. And similar to stats about the wage gap. Both the MHRM and feminists misuse stats for their own gain.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:43 PM
1

Acknowledgement, however halfhearted, of male issues on salon. com? I'd say the MHRM is making progress. Even if it's still all men's fault.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:46 PM
1

So woman are always complaining they have the right to wear anything they want without objectification of men Oh, brother. "Quit objectifying me, only I can objectify me."
/r/MensRights24/10/14 03:28 PM
8

Women comprised a larger percentage of all perpetrators than men: 53.5 percent compared to 45.3 percent Page 14
/r/MensRights24/10/14 03:07 PM
13

So the gist of all the replies is essentially this: “shut the fuck up, white guy.” Yup.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:48 PM
1

It looks like mainstream feminism is dangerously close to going full retard...
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:59 PM
1

How many times has a girl got sent home for dressing like a boy? Now how about the reverse?
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:25 AM
6

I'm a male who is only now (at 28) dealing with having been sexually abused by a (female) babysitter when I was 6 or so, because I'm finally in a healthy relationship, and I can't give her the sex she wants/deserves. Thank you so much for understanding. This right here is why the MHRM needs to exist. An abuse victim is thinking someone for understanding their sexual abuse as a child. No victim of sexual abuse should have to thank someone for understanding. It should just be the norm.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:01 AM
60

Because no one cares when men, aka enemy combatants, die. But they lose their shit about women, aka victims of war, dying.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:39 AM
-7

Vitriol - cruel and bitter criticism. Perhaps calling it cruel is a step too far, otherwise the definition fits what you said and how you said it. Maybe you should look up a definition before you tell others to. So of the two key defining words, we're missing one... But I should look up the definition...
/r/MensRights16/10/14 07:00 PM
-13

I take it you didn't read the COTWA article yesterday that linked to this in the first sentence? Really?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 06:21 PM
-17

I'd look up the definition of vitriol. Because you're confusing it with sarcasm. He contributed nothing that wasn't here. In short, we both contributed nothing. At least I'm honest about it. I'm tired of having repetitive content pollute my front page. Also, these comments are indicative of my character? Dream on.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 06:19 PM
-26

I never said this was stickied The guy you agreed with did. Actually, I was just calling you a karma whore. Which you are. but when you repost something that was on the front page a day or so prior What I saw were articles talking about this letter, what I posted is the letter itself in order to invite people to read it. As far as I know it's not a repost. Oh, so you posted the link that was the in the original COTWA article (in the first sentence) that spent the day at the top of this subreddit…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 05:09 PM
-19

I never said this was stickied, but when you repost something that was on the front page a day or so prior, you're karma whoring.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 05:02 PM
-8

Shhhhhhhhhhh! Karma!
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:21 PM
1

Sometimes. Judges are bound by what the law actually states. They sometimes might note inconsistencies within the law but they are bound to apply it as it is written. So we sometimes see comments such as these. Unless it's the Supreme Court. They'd just strike down the law.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:51 AM
1

It's not a problem if men do it to other men, then they deserve it.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 03:01 AM
1

I thought you were being sarcastic. The basic premise of the episode is that a male kindergarten student is being raped (statutory) by his hot kindergarten teacher. His older brother goes to the police but their reaction is "Nice" that he gets to bang a hot woman, not of disgust of a 5 year old being raped by an adult. Most people who watched the episode seem to not understand the ripping satire of the American justice system in the same situation with teenage boys. poor quality video clip
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:32 PM
1

A joke? Do you actually get the premise of the episode?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:51 PM
1

You didn't read the article. Or at least understand what it says. Dr Harper is critiquing the fact that a vaccine that has been proved to work for at least 5 years is being touted to work lifetime. It may in fact work lifetime, but there's just no evidence to support that and this is what should be told to parents.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:34 PM
2

Well, can't everyone see she's obviously the victim here? She has no agency.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:29 PM
3

There ought to be repercussions for students who make false accusations — a note put into their file or, at the very least, an apology, she said. Are you fucking kidding me?
/r/MensRights29/09/14 07:38 AM
1

It's different when you literally see sexism happen right before your eyes. And you can do it with tact. But I agree that it's probably best for another time.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:44 PM
25

That was the most disturbing part for me at least. Society teaches us that if a man is getting beaten by a woman, he must deserve it. That's also disturbing.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:45 AM
9

Men must, indeed, “feel welcome to participate in the conversation” about gender issues. But very few will do so if that “conversation” amounts to being told to “shut up and listen” while women talk about the horrible things men do to women And that about says it all.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 04:39 AM
-4

If you're unable to differentiate between what seems to be an honest attempt at being feminist (whatever that means) and some tabloid trash, then you're a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:18 AM
2

I assume they claim they fight for LGBT equality as a sort of front to make themselves look like they're loving and accepting. They pay lip service to other causes to dissuade those from forming their own groups and hurting feminism.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 10:40 PM
14

The Hippocratic oath is not a legally binding contract. Also, the original Hippocratic oath promised never to perform surgery.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:36 PM
3

Some things are so obvious, they don't need a /s.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:03 AM
15

Oh come on, men just need to man up and make their wives happy.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 06:30 PM
1

And remember kids, it's only being overly PC when we demand male victims of domestic violence not be mocked.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 12:30 AM
2

This guy doesn't need ideology, he needs some practical advice. One of us has offered this.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 10:37 PM
26

Relationship advice in /r/mensrights is like bizarro /r/relationships. Instead of the first piece of advice being the woman to divorce the man right of the bay, it's vice versa. Don't listen to that advice. You need to have a serious discussion with your wife. Women don't respect guys who are "wussies", but crying doesn't make you a wussy. Accepting your wife's behaviour without telling her that shit ain't gonna fly makes you a wussy. You gotta let her know she can't disrespect you. Both of you …
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:44 PM
1

What they did was give her a free pass without setting a precedent.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:27 PM
1

Technically she used a different defence, but how different is it from that?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 12:37 AM
1

I guess this proves that people who cat call are giant douchebags.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 11:19 PM
5

In Canada, you can't claim "battered woman" if the murder is carefully planned out. Yeah, the Supreme Court of Canada disagrees with you
/r/MensRights12/09/14 09:19 PM
1

He says "woman" once in the whole video. The more important issue is pretending that young people these days can just change how the world is run. How naive/full of shit is he?
/r/MensRights12/09/14 09:03 PM
1

Women need to knock this shit off after breakups and divorces because they are making every post split accusation highly suspect You're saying every post split accusation wasn't already highly suspect?
/r/MensRights12/09/14 07:45 AM
1

It doesn't matter what other people do, but the worshipped person rarely respects the worshipper, regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:08 PM
2

Worship =/= respect
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:44 AM
2

The one thing they do have right is that you can choose not to look. When men go into female dominated areas they get the same shit as vice versa. Unless they grovel.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 05:22 PM
3

I'm not sure comparing a legitimate problem to this hair brained story is constructive.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 12:27 AM
1

If you make it that narrow a topic. But if you consider women treating boys poorly because they are boys, then it's a lot more common.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:28 AM
4

I'm going to beat the crap out of this one person I hate. It won't matter because it's just one out of 7 billion.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 01:15 PM
2

Then you should point out is not a unique idea or one that is that crazy.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:26 PM
1

if you don't want kids you should take extreme precautions to not have them. You don't have a right to sex because you want to have it, then get to ignore the fruits of that labor because it's convenient for you. I feel like castration services should be subsidized by our governments. Because the people who don't care enough to try are the ones out there making the most babies. Castration =/= sterilization. Would you care to clarify.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:29 PM
5

So, you'd be Canada?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:25 PM
1

Did they really? It was a five minute discussion. I don't think it was that bad.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:40 PM
1

I feel like I need a hug after reading that...
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:39 PM
4

I'm impressed they didn't just talk over her arguments and they let her speak.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 03:11 PM
0

Car crashes are not accidents. They are preventable.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 03:03 PM
94

Shevinsky wasn’t the only feminist to tell other women what they were supposed to think about the issue. This sentence was brilliant.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 02:56 PM
8

This couple has been together and in love with each other for 1 1/2 years. 2 years ago, at the beginning of the relationship, she did some very shitty things for about 6 months. What. You've gotta be a troll. Because if you don't see why being cheated on and lied to for 6 months out of 18 is reason enough to end a relationship, you must be from a different planet.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:32 PM
85

It's like any criticism of Israel is seen as antisemitism.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:41 PM
3

I suspect it will attack both the men and women involved. But I can't know until I see it.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 06:42 PM
20

I reserve judgement until I actually can see the show.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 02:28 PM
1

Marriage is a great deal for women. They can make the "vow", and then fuck around, divorce and take the majority of the couples wealth and the kids and just fuck off while the guy keeps maintaining her lifestyle.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:48 PM
13

It's like having a club called "Whites Only" and claiming it's for every race. Well by helping whites only, they ARE helping all the other races.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:57 PM
4

"The best interest of the child is all that matters, so u an going to punish the father for pushing his own rights." -Judge Murphy
/r/MensRights16/08/14 04:42 PM
10

You just don't get it with your simpleton male brain, but the irony was sooooooo deep.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 04:09 PM
64

I don't understand why he stays with her. "I will tell everyone you raped me if you leave me."
/r/MensRights16/08/14 04:24 AM
1

That was a sarcastic statement.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:25 PM
6

That was some gut wrenching stuff. I wondered if his divorces played any role in his death. I no longer wonder.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:01 PM
3

Men in our society acting macho about things they know nothing about based on what they've been trained by society. Nothing new.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:25 AM
2

Or shot.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:59 PM
2

Don't worry everyone, she's mentally ill and doesn't belong in prison.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 06:44 PM
7

Are you suggesting that men and women aren't completely equal in every way, misogynist shitlord?
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:15 AM
-10

This comment could use a better explanation.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 04:15 PM
-1

Searching pubmed would indicate this statement is false.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:07 PM
6

The medical benefit in terms of AIDS prevention for circumcision has been questioned a lot lately.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:33 AM
1

I wasn't implying that. I'm just not sure I agree with the argument.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:36 PM
6

I'm asking this in earnest, but isn't that what black actors/singers/entertainers had to do in the mid 20th century? I don't think women face the same discrimination in comedy, but what if someone brings that argument up?
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:39 AM
1

There is no evidence sex even occurred.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 02:11 PM
7

Where does she force him into sex?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:53 PM
1

Probably because you implied the victim of this post shouldn't get help here because he's a bad guy. I didn't imply such thing, you can only get that if you exaggerate it. Not keen and his post history rubs me the wrong way are far from saying "Let's not defend him, he's a bad guy". He replied to you already anyways. Which is why I said your implied it instead of explicitly saying that. Even if I said "Let's not defend him, he sounds like a bad guy", it wouldn't make me a "man hater", "SRS" and …
/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:36 PM
8

While I support a woman's choice, I cannot support violence in a situation like this.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 11:51 PM
6

One of the points of MR is that just like no one deserves rape, no one deserves false rape accusations. What he was implying is antithetical to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:33 PM
4

Probably because you implied the victim of this post shouldn't get help here because he's a bad guy. Despite the fact that he was falsely accused. It doesn't matter who is falsely accused, they deserve justice.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:07 PM
4

most people believe that second part to be true We are beginning to see that this is becoming less and less true.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:44 AM
1

Remember, everyone, rape jokes are only funny if the victim is a man.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:56 PM
27

Oh, so we're only censoring people we disagree with? Well then that's perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:43 PM
2

I don't think it matters of he could. I could write the best essay ever about how Hitler was just misunderstood, but that doesn't change the facts.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:56 PM
2

I guess my university essays shouldn't have warranted high distinctions, then? What does this mean?
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:45 PM
3

I told her it was because I was a slacker. In honesty, it was because the teachers were punishing me with my grades. Murica... fuck yeah?
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:07 AM
9

Then the examiner tells me "your blood pressure, heart rate go up every time I ask you if you committed any sex crimes". I try to explain why that question would cause that response and put me on edge. He tells me "That wouldn't cause your body to respond like that if you were innocent and it was just a unfounded accusation. Are you hiding anything else?" The guy running your test is an idiot on two levels. He doesn't know the point of a polygraph and he doesn't know how traumatic experiences af…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:17 PM
1

An unfortunate symptom of how (in general) people value male and female life differently. That's quite the euphemism.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 04:39 AM
1

See, no reasonable person would assume that I was implying anything but the fact that all men are rapists unlike women. It may not be clear whether I think that some or no women are rapists, but it's implied that there is a significant difference. Otherwise, why would I even comment? Well, I could be commenting to be a to stir the pot and then defend by comment by being a pendantic a-hole, but I wouldn't do that.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:17 PM
-1

When women say all men are rapists, do you think they're implying only all men are rapists or do you think they're omitting the fact that all women are also rapists?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:00 PM
-3

Not really. You are both omitting and implying. Most reasonable people would look at your statement and assume you meant only women vote in this manner.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:37 PM
-1

You're implying they're is only one red ball.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:05 PM
1

the two people pictured in the article aren't exactly an apples to apples comparison considering one accidentally left his child in the car while the other intentionally did it multiple times in the same day. Yeah, one fucking meant to do it and the other didn't fucking mean to do it. Huge fucking difference.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:44 AM
3

The thing that sucks is that the students of the school have to suffer to get justice for the guy here because of the actions of a few.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:59 PM
2

It seems she was spared jail time because he was two months shy of the age of consent.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:06 AM
2

And welcome to modern day feminism, where if a woman even feels threatened by a man, he's guilty.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:03 AM
2

Equality feminists are beginning to defect from "feminism" and join the Mens Rights Movement and Humanist movement. I'd argue that the majority of men here who didn't specifically suffer sexism in divorce or family court would were originally in a similar group. Except without the whole death threats thing.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:56 PM
1

This link was completely intentional.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 12:21 AM
1

Hostility of women toward men: 1. South Korea 2. India Hostility of men toward women: 1. Greece 2. India It seems as though everyone hates everyone in India. My comment was to underline the absolute brutalization of a small group of women by a small group of men in India. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt because of blatant acts of hate as opposed to the statistics that are used in America. You can't deny raped and murdered women when you see their corpses hanging on the front page of wha…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:24 AM
0

India is fucked for men and you've chosen to buy into half of their population's problems without looking into the other half and giving them the benefit of the doubt based on their gender. Is this really the cross you want to die on? Women in India vs men in the US?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 11:59 PM
0

If you're honestly going to compare the position of women in India to that if men in the US, you're not going to make many friends.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:42 PM
1

Based on world news, that 0.51 in India is well earned.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:03 AM
1

What does that even mean?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:49 AM
2

Honestly, when I see things like this, I think "this can't be real, it must be trolling." I'm sorry for what happened to you.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:24 AM
18

He's not blaming then as much as pointing out the hypocrisy of feminists who blame the MRM for this guy's actions.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:46 PM
2

The guy was a narcissist and likely a sociopath. Why anything beyond that is even being considered is beyond me.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:35 PM
1

How many times can the same video be posted in the sand subreddit in one week. Submission #10
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:34 PM
21

"This one trick to get any girl you want." "Doctors hate him!" And unsubscribe.
/r/seduction26/05/14 04:04 PM
5

LogicFail. You can find someone attractive -even love them- and still be raped by that person. He was using extremes to make a point.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:58 PM
2

I just started calling people out. Most people don't even realize. If they do and still say that shit, drop them ASAP.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 04:28 PM
4

Bemoaning the fact that young women aren't suffering discrimination. check Condescension toward youth. check Acting as if people don't realize the stated goals and actual goals of feminism are different. check Poe's law is in full effect. Is this satire? Is it real? You are a free and empowered woman who can do our believe anything... as long as you toe the party line.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 02:20 PM
11

It's the American "justice" system.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 01:00 PM
6

30 years for statutory rape is fucking insane. I'm stunned that she, as a woman, was punished so severely in the US, but 3 decades for this crime is too much. For a woman just as much as it is for a man. Yes, what she did is fucked up, but the sentence does not fit the crime.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 11:36 PM
3

This is literally the only reason. She's so extreme, it's comedic. It's like the Colbert Report, but instead of conservatism it's feminism.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 11:31 PM
-3

Can we just start banning people who link to buzzfeed? This stuff is garbage.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:34 PM
2

Not all men is not the proper response anyway. Not most men.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:20 PM
3

Stop linking to Barbara Ellen and giving her page views.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:09 PM
38

A woman momentarily lashing out at her brother-in-law at a social event does not count as domestic violence. Is this... is this satire?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:57 AM
5

"There's a lot of science now proving that pornography is harmful," Hawkins told reporters on Thursday at the National Press Club in Washington. Bullshit. Prove it, you deceitful control freak. I've sat through presentations on the "evidence" for this and it's poorly done research. Of course, I didn't speak up because it's difficult to argue with extremists (these people are extremists) and that whole arguing for porn publicly thing.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:11 AM
1

Satire.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 03:20 AM
2

He would have been in jail. Likely would not have gone to prison, though.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:08 AM
1

Men's rights needs to step away from cry-baby status and into a level where real issues are discussed and can be disagreed upon. Ah, yes, men's rights should just man up, right. Agree with you on the TRP, though.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 11:15 PM
10

A dishwasher wastes more water? Google that and see if any evidence actually agrees with that uninformed opinion.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:11 PM
22

Which post is the "bad guy"? Because they all suck.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:40 PM
1

They can do whatever the fuck they like. And the police in Canada have gotten away with bloody murder. See Robert Dziekanski, Ian Bush, Orion Hutchinson, Paul Boyd.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 04:22 PM
5

Correcting police is never a safe proposition.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 05:23 AM
5

Aggressor only because she smartly collapses. This is not her first time at the rodeo.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 01:51 AM
19

It also decreases condom use, so...
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:59 AM
38

"A woman's right to be a single mother?" What world am I living on?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:30 PM
17

Whatever you bathroom graffiting shitlord.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 11:04 PM
2

List of people surprised by this: Idiots
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:35 AM
1

You don't see anyone quoting that number anywhere, now do you? It doesn't support the narrative that women are horribly disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:39 PM
6

Better to lie to these girls and tell them there is actually no such thing as virginity, and the men who prefer to marry so called "virgins" are only a minority of woman haters, rather than damn near every high value man. What? What guy with half a brain wants to marry a virgin in 2014? Is this a joke?
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:06 PM
4

I mean, it doesn't apply to the US either (hint, conscription is not a requirement for the vote in the constitution) Your understanding of reality is painfully inadequate.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:52 PM
1

The only thing better than one social, fun guy is two sociable fun guys. If you've got friends, it's a lot easier not to seem desperate. Which you seem to be.
/r/seduction27/04/14 02:53 AM
-35

Yeah, punching someone in the face to get at the next person is not self defence.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:44 AM
-50

I don't mean to be going against the circle jerk, but the guy is definitely more in the wrong here. Yeah, she pushed him and gives a weak seeing at him, but he decks an obviously smaller person. Absolute weak sauce.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 02:59 AM
2

Misogynist in this sense means one that questions the status quo.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:16 AM
3

The sick part is when you read what she and her lawyer say, it's like she's a victim.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:16 PM
1

You did not read the article.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:58 AM
-1

That's no fair. They should share their success.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:53 AM
8

rap hysteria. Remiiiiiiix
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:17 PM
-1

You're missing completely the point of equal opportunity movements which is to give under represented groups community leaders and what not. It doesn't cause brilliant minds to lose out on opportunities, it causes borderline candidates to miss out on opportunities. Assuming they just give up instead of trying again. But why try again when you deserve it. The middle to upper class Caucasians complaining about this have no fucking case. The poor whites are the ones that suffer.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:50 AM
4

On my phone and did not notice the links.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 09:12 PM
-20

Yes, this is what is needed more on this site, tumblr facts rather than carefully cited information.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 04:00 PM
1

The sexual conversation should be subtle and in the form of innuendo, rather than "I want to fuck you." Something along the lines of: Her: Are you always this wild/crazy? Me: If you're lucky you might find out. It's not overtly over the top, but if you keep it in the potential partner zone rather than the friend zone, you'll be much better off. You might turn some women off, but pretending to be her friend will turn all women off.
/r/seduction17/04/14 06:04 AM
2

I wanted to be her friend more than a potential dating partner or something because I feel like friending a girl first is a better option to get to her pussy... I gotta get some vag before I die. Get rid of this fucking attitude and dishonesty. This subreddit isn't about lying to women so you can "get some vag". This subreddit is about being so desirable women can't resist doing you. For starters, be straight forward with the girl and don't shy away from sexual conversation. Don't go into the co…
/r/seduction17/04/14 05:27 AM
4

Hey, I came here to ask for help not get bashed you asshole. I mean I have heard that texting after you get her number whenever is fine, like it doesn't matter when you text her. Yeah, in the right situation, anything is right. Waiting no time at all seems desperate. Women don't like desperate. Depending on your demeanour, you may not have had even a hint of desperation, they've texting early would be fine. Maybe I should have just made a move on her or something? What do you think. Just because…
/r/seduction17/04/14 04:37 AM
7

she mentions that she is a feminist and I ask her wtf that means. She begins to talk about slut shaming at whatnot, again I really don't give a fuck what she is saying. We come up to my apartment complex and I ask her that I don't have many friends and it was nice to talk and meet with her, she tells me that she also liked meeting me, then offers to give me her phone number, so I get her phone number and tell her we should hang out soon. Anyways I text her like 30 min later that its me and we sh…
/r/seduction17/04/14 04:04 AM
20

No feminist says women lose their agency to consent after a glass of wine with dinner. Not even 2 or 3 glasses of wine. The "it's rape if she's wasted" refers to a state where the person is physically unable to give consent, not too drunk to make a wise decision. This is just not true.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:01 AM
1

When I was in that age category, I still blindly believed feminism was a good force because that is what I had been told.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:01 AM
28

To some this will only be evidence of patriarchy preventing exposure of the truth.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 06:47 PM
1

Even if you do everything right, she could feel used or her friends could convince her that she should feel used if you have sex on the first date. So don't do it. There's no rush.
/r/seduction14/04/14 01:22 AM
5

No one expects the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights13/04/14 09:38 PM
-4

That's only reported violence...
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:25 PM
-9

Well, I just did check, and it's number 8. It's a different source, but still lazy.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:43 PM
18

I came here to write that. "Men suffer because it's the fault of other men" is what's being described here. But that's not the case. It's the fault of both men and women.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:21 PM
-4

Wasn't this posted just days ago?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:13 PM
1

I don't understand American laws all that well, but how is this not slander?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:38 PM
1

I assume there is the equivalent of the supreme court that will overturn this absurd verdict.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:10 PM
2

Public events like these are the best way to raise awareness, internet activism is a poor second. The former occurs because of the latter. If you think the internet has nothing to do with this, then you're a fool.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:29 AM
17

Wikipedia is as much a source as any encyclopedia. Which means it should never be cited in a college paper.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:33 PM
1

To children, it is a bad word.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:56 PM
10

The little girl described the 'r' word as a swear word, which confused my friend because there are no swear words that she could think of that started with the letter r. Retard.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 05:47 PM
8

Well, to be fair he sold out long before we ever even heard his name. He sold his soul to make a video, and we bought it. Dipshit.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 05:32 PM
11

I wonder what would happen if guys started wearing speedos to class. I'm certain the ban on that, for likely the same reasoning, would garner no rape culture comments.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:03 AM
12

Well to be fair, they welcome anyone who agrees with them.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:59 AM
3

It is troubling to see that the accused woman plead guilty (so she almost certainly did the things she's accused of doing) That's not how logic works.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 11:52 PM
4

I'm curious, what law exactly was broken by the woman here?
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:36 PM
77

Obviously, it's different because women are cute and nice and men are dirty pigs that deserve it.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 08:47 PM
1

I have to push the pram along.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 08:00 AM
1

I think that in cases where you can prove that someone knowingly made a false claim of any crime, the false accuser should receive the same sentence as the person they are accusing would have received if found guilty. Why not just treat it like every other crime? Both rape and false accusations.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:28 AM
78

You're not a 28 year old virgin, you're a 28 year old guy. If you keep thinking of yourself as X, you're going to stay X.
/r/seduction28/03/14 05:38 AM
1

lol @ spelling. Yeah, you're a real intellectual. (smart people know spelling is arbitrary and doesn't really matter all that much; just thought you should know). When I see ignorance, I correct it. I in now way uses your error to undercut your argument like you seem to be trying to use my comment to undercut mine. It matters because counter-arguments are constructed in response to arguments, aka. grounds. If you don't know what the grounds are, on what would you base a response? Your gut feelin…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:29 PM
2

It's funny how you gloss over the fact that the mother considered you a threat until she talked to you.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:16 PM
2

"I saw him touch the child. Later he tried to grab my boobs and then raped me." Will, he didn't physically, but he did with his mind.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:48 PM
1

XP from a thumb drive, you say? Go on.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:33 PM
6

Girls mature faster, they say. Boys can consent to sex with adults, they say.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:10 AM
1

Propose. And really, does it matter? Unless it's for gross violation of university rules, it's obviously censorship by certain members of the university of a group they dislike.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:31 PM
22

Yes, patriarchy is to blame for this person's terrible decision making ability. Not only do they want more money, more vacation time and less work, they won't even start working for a year. What in the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:38 PM
1

ITT: People who did not read the entire article.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:25 PM
0

As opposed to any of the content here? "Hey guys, approaching women works because most guys are too scared to do it."
/r/seduction15/03/14 11:17 PM
-2

One day, people will look back and realize the fundamentalist crazies on both sides were fucking losers.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:39 PM
7

If you dress like a schmuck to a business meeting, you're definitely lacking some brains. Unless you're a billionaire.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:28 PM
7

That'd be true if the only thing being assessed was race.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:56 PM
7

False. Men cannot be victims.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:19 PM
5

It's funny that they don't quote the more upvoted comments as much as they do the fringe comments. But I guess that is journalism these days: agenda pushing supported by spun facts.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:38 AM
3

Why not just treat it like any other crime: sanely?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:41 PM
1

Poe's law at work.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:58 PM
1

That time is far better spent with others. But if you like wasting your time and being a target of vitriol, that's your prerogative.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 02:59 PM
3

Why respond? There is no point in changing the minds of those who have already made their decision on MRA. The people you should focus on are those who haven't. Convince the average Joe that you're right and it won't matter what this guy thinks.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 10:01 AM
2

Compassion for humans is a good thing. FTFY
/r/MensRights04/03/14 06:00 PM
-3

The point isn't to convince feminist extremists, it's to convince the average person. And one person stating making a comment about tone is not tone policing. And where else should I say that I think your shitty attitude is not helpful? You're complaining about being policed, yet you're cursing me out and telling me what to write and where.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:34 AM
-9

If we want to be taken me seriously, we should take the high road when possible.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 12:44 AM
1

These guys seemed like jerks. Yup. An argument could be made that this is pretty close to sexual harassment. You're going to have to explain that. No-one should be making statements like this towards anyone, regardless of gender. Agreed.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:59 PM
-21

That type of tone and the potential for being seen as chauvinist is deleterious to the cause.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:44 PM
9

Well, if it's in Holland she should have destroyed his bicycle.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:41 PM
4

A more realistic response: Fuck what his doctor said. And he's dead now anyway, so who cares?
/r/MensRights01/03/14 05:11 PM
30

That's why you listen to your customers, not crazy idiots.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 05:06 PM
11

Here's the thing, if you know someone robbed a store and you say nothing; you're legally just as guilty as the robber. Same with murder;but when it comes to rape suddenly it's different. Not if they robbed your store...
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:23 PM
-2

FFS, I downvoted you because you contributed nothing. By your own admission, there was already a better article available, yet you felt the need to post this useless article. Your linked article said nothing about boys being targeted. It is not appropriate for this sub and neither is your karma whoring.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 04:29 AM
8

I think this highlights the problem so well. Shirts proclaiming the celebration of suffering men fall in seamlessly into a list of shirts that really aren't negative.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 11:24 PM
1

I'm not sure what would indicate that. I don't understand how the OP could quote information NOT in the linked article. Why even bother with the link if there is nothing there.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 08:36 PM
1

See edit.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 08:34 PM
-16

I'm downvoting this as you provide absolutely no evidence that there was targeting of males at all. This is a shitty execution of what could have been good material. Edit: I'd like to highlight the fact I said the OP did not provide any information of the sexism, not that it didn't exist. Why should we have to look things up to prove the veracity of the claims. It should be in the OP or at least in a comment.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 02:19 PM
5

The comments... shudders
/r/MensRights17/02/14 06:06 PM
1

Did I just read that Allen defending himself proves his guilt?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 02:48 PM
1

Relatively there are a less angry people here and I'd say that a guy who lost his kids has a lot more to be angry about than most in TRP.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 04:55 PM
2

No worries. I'm not ripping in you, just directing you to the correct place.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 01:59 AM
0

Lol, my name doesn't imply anything. I picked words at random to get a username. LOL TRP isn't a movement. It deals with accepting reality as it truly is. If I am an asshole for calling you a weakling, then so be it. When you get sick and tired of being walked on by women come on over to TRP. I was unclear but: your name = the name of the subreddit you are defending = the red pill You call me a weakling, yet I didn't need a movement to "accept reality as it is" and therefore not allow women to w…
/r/MensRights10/02/14 01:57 AM
1

The subreddit is linked in the comment above my first one and it's the top post.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 01:24 AM
6

Ah, yes, because (as your name implies) you're all knowing and the rest of us suckers don't have a clue about the realities of the world. Judging by my brief experiences, including your comment, the reason people have an issue with that place isn't the subject matter, it's just that you're assholes. You should probably work on that, but at the same time, you probably bask in the "persecution". Jeez, all of a sudden you start to sound like another group of people based on the internet...
/r/MensRights10/02/14 01:23 AM
15

While most of the red pill I have seen is kind of fucked up (and angry, always angry) the current top post has an interesting explanation of the whole thing. And for the record I followed your link to get ammo to confirm your post. It's funny how the MRM (a movement that is marginalized because of misconceptions) would marginalize another movement. The irony. In any case, this is part of the top quote. But it's worth pointing out that psychology's general "five stages" model of the grieving proc…
/r/MensRights10/02/14 01:03 AM
14

Poe's law in full effect.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 12:56 AM
44

Some feminists believe that all penetrative sex that a woman has with a man is rape.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 09:08 PM
2

Actually, I'm pretty sure that age is going down due to obesity.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 08:23 PM
1

Have you ever thought that you've had enough of the game for now? Stop putting you focus on hooking up and just see start happens.
/r/seduction03/02/14 05:05 AM
1

My favourite medical advice is that which is based on the most minimal amount of research with a whole load on conjecture. This pediatrician should be proverbially laughed of stage.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:25 PM
3

Can't people just be judged for their current actions, not for the actions certain members of their sex hundreds of years ago?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:20 PM
1

So, you know, organize something rather than expect someone else to.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 08:58 PM
1

I'd say you should write to lego with your story. Yes girls get Barbie lego and a few other sets, but they'd appeal to more girls if they had some girl lego pieces. It lead to more diverse play times. That being said, making half the people of, say, pirates female would just be dishonest to history. Mind you, lego does not need to be since sort of battle ground.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:47 PM
2

Who fucking cares WHO is perpetrating the ridicule, society as a whole allows it to happen.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:28 PM
46

I'm sure he also talked about how blacks make less money. Oh, no? Well he must have talked about how immigrants make less money. Oh, he didn't?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:29 AM
17

The type of woman that bitches about guys being nice to try and get with them romantically is the same kind of woman who will lead a guy on who is into them and use the shit out of them rather than tell them the truth, not to avoid hurting their feelings, but to continue using the shit out of them. Thank god I've never been accused of being a nice guy.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:59 AM
5

OP block out the the pain in my brain, please.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:36 AM
7

This person has obviously not delivered a baby.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 04:18 PM
4

People are missing the point. The point isn't that the woman got all the prize money with the help of a handicap. Men ARE better designed for running physically and if someone wants to make a gimmick to try and balance this for a battle of the sexes, that their prerogative. The point here is that the handicap is being ignored. That's just disingenuous.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 06:15 AM
5

People say that, yet what evidence do they present that it is the truth?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:01 AM
3

The beauty of the situation is that it doesn't even have to exist, they just have to say it does.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 04:29 PM
1

Any one using the "dictionary defines X as" is dropping a letter grade in my books Modern feminism =/= feminism. Using the phrase "modern feminism" most of the time is going to make this essay more palatable to everyday folk. Especially if you did a bit more to discuss early feminists in a positive light. You have a "tendency" to misuse "quotations".
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:25 PM
18

I can't even comprehend how good the sex must have been for this idiot to have given her a third opportunity to stab his dumb ass. This comment is why MRAs need to exist.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 11:56 PM
9

I'd much rather this than an actual baby be used as a bargaining chip. But that's just me.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:51 PM
8

I am one of those guys who does not wish to generalize feminists and their views. I do believe there are equity minded feminists that are not simply gynocentric in their view of equality, but some of them make it really hard to make that case to others. Except reality seems to dictate otherwise.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 08:04 PM
6

Ok, but how many are in industry? You know, where it's based more on merit, entrepreneurship and provable performance. Yeah, that's a really, REALLY idealistic view of "industry".
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:47 PM
21

Yeah, well that's only if you look at the facts.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:46 PM
1

This is actually the subject of the first episode of one of my favorite documentary series, Hjernevask a series where a Norwegian comedian asks questions about society to sociologists in Norway, then travels to big name universities such as Oxford and Harvard where the professors there will almost unanimously tell him the sociologists were idiots and that there is no backing whatsoever for their theories. Its subbed and all 7 episodes are available online for free, so I highly recommend the seri…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:45 PM
14

It's not just about strength, bro.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:38 PM
57

They just ignore science.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:34 PM
19

Also, rapists. They're all rapists.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 03:07 PM
25

MRAs are men. PUAs are men. Therefore, all men are MRA pickup artists.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 02:18 PM
1

I'd say not shoving your head in the dirt and saying "The West is bad, too!" would be a start.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 06:13 AM
1

But violence against women in India IS fucking insane. And honor killings. I can't recall if they have acid to the face attacks regularly, though. Do not downplay the plight of women in India because feminists in the west have gone way overboard.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 05:45 AM
1

100% of gang rapes that are followed by additional gang rapes by another group of men happen in India. I thought that you were saying that half the population in the world lived in Asia, but it's becoming increasingly apparent you meant India. This is just plain wrong and it makes you look ignorant.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 05:09 AM
7

Godwin's law?
/r/MensRights02/01/14 03:36 PM
4

Alternate title to this thread: echo chamber for a situation I disagree with. Honestly, any one posting an opinion not in line with OP has been down voted in this and the original thread. Did I stumble into r/srs on opposite day?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 07:02 PM
0

50% of the population lives in that area of the globe. It is expected that a higher absolute number of human interaction events of all types will occur there, including crimes. Including outlier events. Yet the only places we hear about back to back gang rapes of the same person by different groups of men is India.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:14 PM
18

"Wallets, we'll let you know if we need some money. Otherwise, fuck off!" - Utah FTFY
/r/MensRights01/01/14 08:05 AM
-1

Yes. But that hardly means the guy is an asshole who has no reason to be upset at someone who misled him. I never said he was an asshole. I said he needs to reevaluate his life. He really does. I know I would in his shoes.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:00 PM
-5

The woman chose to marry him knowing his intentions of not wanting kids because they discussed that issue before they got married, a whole year before they got married. Great. The problem is having kids, not getting pregnant. If she had told him when it happened and told him she was having an abortion, I see no issue there. You see no issue? Ha. Like you know anything about this situation except for his post. The fact that she felt the need to get abortions in secret speaks volumes about their r…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:58 PM
-3

I think asking him not to get a vasectomy is not unreasonable. She sacrificed a lot for him.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:47 PM
19

It would have probably been better if it focused on genuine issues, like sexually touching someone without their consent, or street harassment. Or the rampant gang rape. Seriously, wtf?
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:47 PM
-2

The guy is asking for relationship advice. If he wants that relationship to lay, of course he doesn't want to get angry at his wife in her time of need. And he should ask himself why she felt the need to keep this from him from several years. This wasn't an affair where she was fucking some dude, this was abortions. She felt she needed to hide them from her because he literally told her that having kids was a deal breaker. She didn't say "whoops, look what happened" as do many woman have done in…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:33 PM
-7

His wife doesn't trust him. Shouldn't he reevaluate his life and wonder why that is?
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:23 PM
-1

It's almost like this article can't be simple distilled into two short sentences.
/r/seduction31/12/13 06:10 AM
68

They want defined gender roles for men and freedom for women. AKA your cake and eating it, too.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:45 PM
8

'Nice guy' is the term used for someone who is nice to women in hopes that his behavior will get him sec with said women. You want to be a good guy or an ethical man. The term 'nice guy' just makes me cringe.
/r/seduction27/12/13 05:30 AM
3

And from what you are saying, you are talking about a different situation, where a girl would purposly call a guy (she actually likes) a jerk in public or mention it to his close friends.. just to get his attention. I had this happen a couple of times to, where a girl would tell my friends some weird stuff, basically some stuff about me that wasnt ..lets say "a compliment". I kinda realized that she was trying to dig me and confronted her, when you confront her.. you will know if she actually me…
/r/seduction24/12/13 02:49 PM
14

Good stuff, this could have been a lot shorter, I tend to have my eyes glaze over with long lists because usually they're full of shit. This isn't. For the lazy: 1) Not everything is a shit test – The way I see it, if a girl “shit tests” you more than 3 times she probably just doesn’t like you and/or she is a just a jerk. 2) The answer to every situation is not a witty/funny line. 3) Different situations require different things. 4) Tricks/gimmicks are just that, they are not game. 5) DON’T TRY …
/r/seduction24/12/13 08:11 AM
-7

I'm guessing that's where a lot of women in their 20's go. Based solely on conjecture.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 03:56 PM
37

female rape is worse anyway Obviously, because men deserve it for dressing that way.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 06:02 AM
23

Her science is just incorrect.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 05:57 AM
25

If it's a black man's issue, then it's a man's issue.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 08:18 AM
11

I was the top male student in my class until high school. (it sounds arrogant, but it's the truth) I always perceived my female teachers as always being meaner to me than the top girls. I figured it was something wrong with me. Regardless of the truth, that's fucked up.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:30 PM
1

Did actually read more than the title? Because I thought the save thing until I read the article.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:35 PM
3

It's a tactic to discredit MR.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:40 PM
1

Yet somehow whenever we talk about false rape accusations people always assume we just mean that if the person is found not guilty then the accuser should be found guilty. I'm getting sick of having to make this distinction. There will always be a few people who do not understand logic.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:44 PM
2

Can everyone here please acknowledge (which the article fails to do) that there is a difference between purposefully, falsely, and maliciously accusing someone of a crime and false conviction based on misidentification? Of course it didn't make that distinction. Only the former is a false accusation.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:41 AM
10

Unless they were quite explicit that he was expelled for the the possibility of rape, rather than rape, they slandered him. Or libeled him, or even both.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:43 PM
1

Then stop referring to you just "hooking" up with her and tell your friend to back the fuck off. You've probably sent mixed signals about this girl, so make yourself clear.
/r/seduction23/11/13 05:01 PM
-1

I don't give a fuck how little action he gets, ex's are off-limits, no exceptions. Same as family members. If you get that worked up over someone you barely even dated, everyone's going to have a bad time.
/r/seduction23/11/13 04:59 PM
-9

An ex of a few months and a friend who doesn't get much female attention. It sounds like OP is being a bigger douche here.
/r/seduction23/11/13 05:46 AM
12

While I think men and women should be treated equally under the law No, you don't.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 08:12 AM
9

Oh, no, that wouldn't benefit women. Dint be ridiculous.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:24 PM
4

I'm a little confused here. You mother brainwashed you and your sister by telling you your father was a drunk abuser when he was, in fact, a drunk abuser. Just less of an abuser than your mother? And this isn't parental alienation you describe, it's flat out abuse with death threats. Are you arguing for or against PAS because you seen to be doing both.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 04:46 PM
2

It makes perfect sense. So everyone should have complete access to birth control, their convictions be damned. But no woman should have access to abortion because of her convictions? How does this make sense? I don't see that as being any different than the liberal tendency to try to force everyone to live life by their rules. Because it isn't. Both of you think that you're right. Neither of you give a fuck if you make life a living hell for people who disagree with you. And no one is forcing an…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:13 PM
2

I do not support abortion unless it's happening to save the life of the mother; I think that girls and women should have ready access to all forms of birth control and that doctors or pharmacists who will not help a woman or girl get some form of birth control if she requests it should lose their license for being a putz who cares more about their beliefs than about the rights of their patients. This does not compute. Physicians should not be guided by faith, but you believe public policy should…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 06:27 AM
56

My mind is blown by the fact that psychiatrists can claim that an 18 year old was the victim of parental alienation syndrome. I can understand a 14 year old, but an 18 year old? Are you kidding me? There comes a point when you think "maybe she just is that big of an asshole."
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:57 AM
2

Not that I don't agree with men's issues, but why not focus on things that kill a lot of men? Like colon cancer, under use of the medical system and dangerous jobs?
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:33 AM
4

Now, the mother reducing the time that he sees his boys? That's another question entirely. Is it? I think it's just a continuation of how big a scumbag this piece of shit of a person is.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 01:46 AM
24

Try? She was successful.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:36 PM
138

So less men are in university because of the choices they make? But there are less women in STEM because of the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 05:47 PM
14

I feel like this could be Scumbag Steve'ed pretty easily: Finally gets... Still doesn't get it.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 10:58 PM
14

How many women do you know that are willing to "date down"? No, they need a man more successful in some way. Which is why so many 30 somethings are sad and alone. "I like him but he's only a construction worker." I have no sympathy. When you date for position, you've made your bed.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 07:50 PM
7

How does one make a single mistake that results in multiple rapes? The guy kept doing it. It's no longer "a mistake".
/r/MensRights16/09/13 07:23 AM
6

I have a theory though, that the reason women feel like its worse for them is because they're being spoken to as an equal of sorts. All formal manners a lot of guys keep when they're face-to-face with a girl, whether they notice they do this or not, no longer count because the game doesn't make special exceptions in ability because you're a girl, so, other players equally don't make that exception because they want other good players on their team so they can win. That's quite the insight.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:49 AM
-1

Yes, that would be great. Then me and my girlfriend could sit in separate cars. Ass.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:08 PM
3

The times I'm mentioning I was walking hand in hand with my girlfriend. It wasn't cool.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:18 AM
9

I'm a man who has been groped by women. These people can fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:32 PM
5

Hell, few of them are even the recipients of any awards, save one or two that were for women's lit. Obviously, that's because of the patriarchy, shit lord.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 02:21 PM
9

Why would she go to jail? She's the victim.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 02:39 AM
2

I agree you can't argue with ignorant people. But the reason he didn't try and educate them is that it would be hard and require a lot of effort and patience.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 04:15 PM
3

You would be very unsuccessful just using facts.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:16 PM
178

He told me you can't change people's opinion if they're that ignorant, so argueing would just of been a waste of time. Don't believe a word of that. He is just a lazy teacher.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:00 AM
14

Holy fuck. Jeffery Dalmer had anti-social personality disorder, but you didn't see anyone claiming his disorder was an excuse. This is insane.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:30 PM
1

Feeling violated is not the only thing required for something to be sexual assault. That would completely cheapen sexual assault. It was sexual harassment which is NOT the same. And I did feel violated. I don't want someone to be charged with a crime. I just don't want to be told I liked it because I am a man. I just don't wanted to be mocked for being bothered by it.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:02 AM
1

What do you mean I don't care? I do care. And I was upset about it. It happened while I was with my girlfriend and I found it extremely disrespect. But to claim it was sexual assault, that is just insane.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 05:23 AM
2

Considering he has white women in his comic, one could say all he did talk about was the rape of white women. But we know that's not the case. Not explicitly mentioning something doesn't make it stop existing.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 05:21 AM
2

Listen, no one is saying that rape of males in the army isn't a problem. What I am saying is complaining that a cartoon using only one angle looks petty and is not hopeful to the cause. Also, baseless accusations about me doesn't make me look bad, it makes you look bad. One can support MR and not support your particular point. Don't be so arrogant to think otherwise.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 05:18 AM
9

Well, yeah. Women are the true victims of war.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:07 AM
7

He's also denying that murder is bad by not taking about that. Doonesbury supports murder!
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:05 AM
2

Why? This is a comic about being in the army from the perspective of a woman. Why the hell would man on man rape be mentioned? That does not affect women. This post is the kind of "me too" shit feminists whine about and should be avoided.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:04 AM
1

Getting your butt grabbed is sexual assault. Wow, is it? Ok, I'm a man who was sexually assaulted at the fair by two women in the presence of my girlfriend. Those women are monsters and need to be brought to justice.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:01 AM
6

Bringing a girl back to your place is not the time to be putting bros before hours.
/r/seduction24/08/13 02:39 PM
54

Easy there, shit lord, rape apologist.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 02:21 PM
11

Financially compensated for being fat and out of shape.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:35 AM
36

So an anonymous report of a crime shouldn't be taken at face value? standing ovation
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:54 PM
12

This is not how the law should work because it is my understanding Americans have a right to face their accusers in court (non American here). What a gross perversion of justice.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:52 PM
1

Wow, your logic is about as sound as that of the article.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:50 PM
51

While I won't argue any of your points specifically, I'd be careful to generalize based on a population of women that is already pre-selected. Especially on things like numbers of dudes they text and how often they get hit on. It's really sad that you get protested on what you've written. Especially on things (most) women crave, like dominant men.
/r/seduction16/08/13 04:00 AM
1

Also, durex sensi-thin. The important thing is to try on a few. I've noticed some are too tight for me and then I can't finish. And I'm not a particularly large guy by any means.
/r/seduction15/08/13 04:48 PM
25

A worthwhile human cares about the well-being of humans. FTFY
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:17 AM
2

I'm guessing this is based on your extensive experience rather than purely on conjecture.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:16 AM
29

Talking about women in anything but a positive manner is misogyny, didn't you know?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:14 AM
5

Censorship is a coercive government action which forcibly prevents the exercise of free speech. Government involvement is not required for censorship.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:13 PM
2

Dude, FUCK scattered clouds and showers!
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:52 PM
9

Until he disagreed with them.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:41 PM
1

I really don't care enough about arguments to see where an argument went wrong. Next time, careful how you say things because a snap shot like this could be how people judge you, for better or worse.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 07:57 AM
0

You're right about the science. But then you go ahead and fuck it up by claiming poor use of studies (which is unbelievably rampant everywhere) is actually intentionally deceiving rather than people misunderstanding how comparisons should work. You should have just said it could make things look intentionally misleading and cheapen their argument.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:06 AM
2

If you don't spend any time setting up a profile, of course it's going to be a waste of time.
/r/seduction04/08/13 05:16 PM
6

Even before that: lose all interest.
/r/seduction03/08/13 06:38 PM
13

It is a valid method. It just could take forever and does not guarantee results.
/r/seduction03/08/13 05:22 PM
82

Women and men have a fantastically different understanding of nerdy. Basically, they want models in glasses.
/r/seduction03/08/13 04:51 PM
36

Haha, goddammit.
/r/seduction03/08/13 04:49 PM
74

Bring a nice guy can work. But so can waiting around for a woman to just fall into your lap.
/r/seduction03/08/13 04:26 PM
248

No way man, girls prefer shy guys with questionable confidence.
/r/seduction03/08/13 04:16 PM
33

This is what institutionalized sexism looks like.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 01:17 AM
90

And they actually think they're the good guys.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 01:15 AM
1

I was quoting actual statistics, BTW. If you're going to ignore reality, and the fact that condoms are only twice as effective as pulling out (both of which are about 6 and 5 times more effective than nothing, respectively) then we're really going to get nowhere. Look up the evidence before shooting your mouth off. For pregnancy, there is abortion and birth. Not even any other shitty options. Vasectomy, like tubal ligation, are not essential emergency medical services.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 03:08 AM
-2

Pulling out is about 73% effective (vs condoms which are 85%). Also, anal.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:31 AM
7

You bet your fucking ass abortions should be easier to get than vasectomies. There are a so many other options for birth control, while there are two options (abortion or birth) when you are pregnant. Why make such an idiotic comparison?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:19 PM
4

Calling a spade a spade is not white knighting. I'd prefer not to have complete jerk offs associated with this community. This community is about being successful with women, not about demeaning them.
/r/seduction30/07/13 08:39 PM
0

I'm agreeing with you and expanding on it. I'm not the one down voting you, by the way.
/r/seduction30/07/13 08:36 PM
2

Most guys here are probably average looking. Because most people are. And some women overlook looks for personality. But you can't lack both.
/r/seduction30/07/13 06:46 PM
4

My female friends seem to think they deserve perfect men despite not being perfect themselves. And you know what, it's cool they're not perfect. But don't expect more from others than you do of yourself. There will always be people who do, though. Male and female. Women to the "perfect guy" and men to sex. The latter really is a symptom of the nice guy phenomenon.
/r/seduction30/07/13 04:40 PM
3

First off, I'm not your bro. And how do you presume to speak for the whole community? Not everyone here is for the same thing. Some guys are only here for confidence and, you know what, that's ok. And if there are guys here who just want sex, that's ok, too. And you don't need to act like a douche to do that.
/r/seduction30/07/13 04:35 PM
4

I care. She didn't figure things out because of some introspection and realization that there was something inherently unjust about the police. She only cared because her golden child was affected. Yes, there is a HUGE difference between the two because she still completely lacks the moral compass to be involved in any if this effectively.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 02:53 PM
4

My experience with women in car sales is that they think tits are enough to sell a car. Which is stupid and sexist. Also, even if women were better at the job, you can't openly discriminate based on sex. You just hire the best candidate.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:50 AM
3

Yeah, but it's a lot easier just to write things than to research them before writing them.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:55 PM
2

Quotations. And I believe that law exists here as well in the same fashion. You can be discriminated against for being a male or for being white. It's nauseating.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:40 PM
15

Canada does NOT ban hate speech. Canada bans hate speech that encourages violence.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:46 AM
1

I argued your side of things in the past until I actually looked in the CDC website and saw the quality life years lost of prostate cancer was actually higher than breast cancer. Yes, you're more likely to die with prostate cancer, but it's so much more common than breast cancer. Also, 1% of breast cancer is men, and men are far more likely to die than women of the disease.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:30 PM
4

Whoosh
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:58 PM
3

But he was arrested for rape, what more proof do you need?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 03:32 PM
2

So to be clear, pointing out to men what constitutes a crime is righteous, but pointing out to women what constitutes a crime is ill willed?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:09 PM
1

No one is discounting millions of women just because. He's saying that you can't reason with them because of the very situation you mentioned. You try talking and they just brow beat you. You're a sexist pig if you don't agree with their opinion because there is only one opinion.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:06 PM
1

That's sexist.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:41 AM
1

Some people think their shit don't stink. Both male and female. These are those people.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:34 AM
8

Of course women don't care if they cheat. They get the kids and dad picks up the tab.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:07 AM
5

The people quoted in this article completely ignore borderlines. Who would do ANYTHING for attention.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:54 AM
1

Speaking of delayed responses...
/r/MensRights09/07/13 10:45 PM
4

It's not even spectacular. He piqued the girls interest and then talked successfully to another girl. Human want what they can't have.
/r/seduction08/07/13 04:04 PM
-1

Well, if y change your mind, you might want to back up what you say. Especially your first paragraph.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:44 PM
61

Men are lucky to get raped. Everyone knows they want it all the time.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:25 AM
11

Are you really surprised? If you're not with them, you're against them.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:00 PM
-1

What you're saying I'm the last sentence is contradictory. He can't do what we said and text whenever he wants.
/r/seduction02/07/13 07:56 PM
0

Really, it used to be a sexist thing against women. Now it's a sexist thing BY women.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 07:32 PM
19

And as was said elsewhere, do not be overly available.
/r/seduction02/07/13 04:10 PM
3

This is NOT a consensual relationship. Even ignoring age, there is no way a student can consent to having sex with their teacher.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:34 PM
3

They use that line to cover up the fact that despite having career success, certain men don't want to date them. It's as if that alone is enough to get "the man of their dreams". It's not for men, so why should it be for women?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:24 PM
44

Calling guys with trades jobs lower class. Saying guys are intimidated to date them. Being type A personalities ego expect their way constantly.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:49 AM
28

But boy do they come with baggage.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:12 AM
3

The solution is to have his lawyer bring it up with HR. We'll see some quick action then.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 11:20 PM
12

Men don't understand the hardships women go through. And what have men ever lost because of their sex. /s
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:45 PM
9

That's just fucked up. What about women who have medical conditions? Done people are just idiots.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:21 PM
2

Very few of these quotes would be acceptable under any circumstance, regardless of context. Although I agree some research should be done to verify and cite each quote.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:58 PM
1

who are we to say unequivocally that it is harder to be a woman than a man, harder to be a mother than a father? Who are we to make that sort of judgment? We know that no one fully understands our life and our suffering, so how are we to conclude that anyone else’s is any worse or any better? The most important realisation.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:36 AM
4

No one is suggesting all men are good parents or want relationships with their kids. No one is suggesting unfit fathers get unlimited access to children. No one is suggesting responding to articles about unfit father or monsters like Ariel Castro with statistics. What the OP is asking is how many men are not given access to their kids because of women's decisions.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:04 PM
6

Which is the myth OP is trying to dispel.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:16 PM
108

The word you are looking for is "kidnap".
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:12 PM
-9

His original comment did not ask for advice. It just says what he would have done if it were his own son. Also, harass him? Give me a break.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:58 PM
1

The direct anatomical "twin" if the testicles are the ovaries...
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:41 PM
-14

No, you don't understand. He'd rather get MRA karma rather than lift a finger and DO SOMETHING. OP, you are part of the problem. You had a chance to step in and you did nothing.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:40 PM
2

You can if you have twins.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 07:20 PM
31

The first place to start with pay disparity is that many women think that a woman who just returned from a year long mat leave and is not at the same position as her colleague who did not is an example of discrimination. No, you just took a year off, regardless of the reason, you don't get too climb the corporate ladder during that time.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 07:28 AM
2

No one is commenting on your opinion though. We're commenting on what she wrote which seems to imply that this law would only work in one direction. It could be that the writer is really bad at what they do, but it's equally likely that the writer doesn't see the opposite being a problem.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 07:00 PM
2

Because the blogger Herr never once suggests the opposite could happen. It's a man's crime against a woman and nothing else.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 04:27 PM
29

Your niece doesn't sound like a great person at all if she can't understand what she is saying is bad. Unless she is 5 and has been brainwashed completely.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 05:34 AM
1

No. Sweeping generalizations are. Violence may be wrong.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 08:43 AM
1

Not by Canadian law.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 08:14 AM
1

Sorry, I meant to imply university professors are less likely to be caught and exposed, even when some people suspect things.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:38 PM
8

People should be against physical punishment. Not only does it not work, it's the time a lot of abuse happens. Source from Canadian Medical Association Journal
/r/MensRights31/05/13 09:43 PM
2

Both are equally wrong and age isn't even the biggest part, morally. Which is funny because we seem to excuse university professors in the same situations.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:36 PM
6

Care to expand?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:14 PM
19

It is wrong because of the position of power. Just like if a doctor did it or a cop.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:09 PM
9

It hits you in the face if you're not careful.
/r/seduction31/05/13 07:39 AM
4

pushing myself to keep my back straight and shoulders back, and while I haven't seen results it has done wonders for my self-confidence. Um, I'd say those are results. No success, yet, I guess.
/r/seduction31/05/13 05:42 AM
19

Kids do stupid shit. Adults should know better.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 10:57 PM
5

It's way easier to post Facebook screen caps of girls saying borderline sexist things.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 09:15 PM
4

Heeeeeeeeey. ;)
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:52 PM
13

Mainsplaining is the feminist equivalent of Godwin's law.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:59 PM
27

The reason that most CEOs are men is because 99% of women aren't willing to make these sacrifices. And 90% of men.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 08:54 PM
5

You obviously have never been in this position. Otherwise you wouldn't be suggesting this.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 08:52 PM
1

Childhood phimosis is most definitely treated. It's just that the foreskin naturally doesn't fully retract until something like 8 or 10, but that is not phimosis.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 05:37 PM
43

Yeah, holy fuck. You didn't initiate conversation, she did. You didn't isolate her, she did. I guess you deserve credit for acting on the fact she was obviously interested in you from the start, even though you didn't even notice. I also suspect the video mode thing was no accident. It's girls and cameras. It just seems unlikely to be a coincidence.
/r/seduction26/05/13 05:31 PM
6

But that's the point, people claim that false rape claims are exceedingly rare. Which they are not.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 05:04 PM
7

TIL America is the world.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 04:38 PM
0

I guess I don't make myself clear. I don't try to look alpha. I rarely venture into r/seduction. What I do think is that it's mighty ironic that people in a subreddit plagued by judgement based on preconceived notions would trash a subreddit based on preconceived notion. Also, saying that women don't define what women want is moronic. But that's just a side point.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:43 PM
0

It's funny, you talk about the seduction community with about as much ignorance as others talk of mensrights. "Being alpha" is a tool to pick up women, not a lifestyle. r/seduction is about self improvement as much as it is about pickup. But why read anything when you can just make judgements from afar. It's almost comical, really.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:47 PM
17

One small wank for a man... One giant splooge for mankind.
/r/seduction18/05/13 02:42 AM
124

"Hey Seddit, I have some pro advice to help you get laid now that you have the girl naked, in your bed and on your dick."
/r/seduction18/05/13 02:08 AM
-1

No one is polishing a turd, but don't compare a violent assault with the intent of causing an abortion with giving someone an abortificient without their knowledge and consent. Both are wrong, but they are not the same.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:46 AM
-1

Pushing someone down the stairs or kicking them repeatedly in the stomach could cause severe damage and possible death to even a non-pregnant person, whereas the same is unlikely for this situation. In other words, the intent may be the same, but the outcomes will likely be different.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 10:44 PM
0

Well, yes, it is.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 07:17 PM
-1

It's funny because you think facts matter.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 06:49 PM
1

Yes there are arguments for just about every angle, but the biggest lesson in this sub-reddit is self improvement, not pretending to be someone else.
/r/seduction11/05/13 03:07 AM
3

Yes there are arguments for just about every angle, but the biggest lesson in this sub-reddit is self improvement, not pretending to be someone else.
/r/seduction11/05/13 03:07 AM
0

Reading your description of "seduction mode"and the like, it makes me wonder if you even read any of the things here in earnest or just pick the things you like.
/r/seduction11/05/13 02:45 AM
3

I was being serious. There is no injustice here because the story is made up. I did not realize that was your point.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 11:35 PM
1

Well that certainly cleared up a misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:56 PM
7

Yes, unknowingly being forced to raise someone else's child and the mental anguish that WILL cause is no injustice at all. I get that the circle jerk posts can be annoying, but fucking come on.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:36 PM
3

It's funny because despite your accurate post, you're totally missing the point.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:09 PM
1

That actually sounds like a good plan.
/r/seduction18/04/13 03:47 PM
1

It's likely because it never happened...
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:32 PM
4

Better than having this guy's livelihood undercut by lying assholes? I honestly just ignore ratings on controversial topics. Even the random reviews are questionable. Sometimes it's hard to find a trusted source for a review though.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 09:22 PM
19

You mean like the people who give it one star who have actually read it?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:18 PM
4

If you look at the evidence, you'd see that's not the case in Canada.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 07:31 PM
4

Is it not obvious?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:42 PM
14

Reading Seddit =/= learning from Seddit
/r/seduction30/03/13 09:23 PM
6

It's the patriarchy. It holds women back.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 09:19 PM
3

You are not the same as AR (why even use her full name, she doesn't deserve the notoriety). And reasonable people wouldn't lump you in the same class. Again feminism (you) vs "feminism" (her). Of course, I disagree with the assertion that men not talking to women is the same as women not talking to men because they're afraid of getting raped. In our society it's difficult, yet not impossible, to get raped out in the open. All it takes for a woman to claim sexism is a misheard word or, even worse…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:06 PM
13

He was suggesting men not talk to women professionally. Also, his ideas are a bit flawed. Taking advantage if the right to vote is different than the "right to be offended". One was won by feminism, the other by "feminism".
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:51 PM
0

I said many bachelors, which doesn't necessarily include you. And some people are picks. Which sites include you.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:18 AM
0

It's also obviously tongue in cheek.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:50 PM
9

It's not inaccurate in that many bachelors do live in shit holes. But so do many bachelorettes.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:49 PM
-1

The man's realm. And it doesn't count as housework.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:48 PM
10

Well duh, he was a rapist or at least a potential rapist.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:12 PM
6

Poll men asking how many of them have been threatened with false rape charges and you'll see exactly how rare it is.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:55 PM
-4

If you don't think that not being needy, demanding respect, and taking care of her needs aren't important, then I question whether you've ever had a relationship longer than 6 months.
/r/seduction10/03/13 06:10 PM
39

"Keep your laws out of our bedrooms." Signed, Canada
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:37 AM
5

No one ever had a right to murder someone. Murder is not self defense.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:24 AM
1

Empowerment to the point of equality. Anything more world be antithetical to equality.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 11:12 PM
19

How about mandatory paternity tests to collect child support?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:26 PM
11

Kids. As in plural! That's just unbelievable.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:13 PM
2

ITT: A guy who thinks he has figured out life, but doesn't understand that actors get women because they are famous. This advice is useless at best and fucking toxic at worst. And with more than a hint of arrogance. What a douche.
/r/seduction17/02/13 06:52 PM
11

He means office work versus heavy labor, you hand job.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:47 AM
1

FYAD = fuck yourself and die?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:51 AM
6

Holy fuck. The US is fucked up.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:28 PM
2

GTA is obviously not real life. Its name is a crime FFS. Boyfriend Trainer takes a real life situation and says you should beat your boyfriend. Can you really not see the difference here?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:12 PM
1

The point is, that record will not be accessed without the person's consent.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:01 PM
1

Exactly what do you think happens to that record later?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:32 AM
1

You get asked. Therefore you need to consent to their involvement. They can't just report at their discretion.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:31 AM
1

Health care employees are legally FORBIDDEN from reporting anything without the consent of a patient unless: a) there are children in the home (call children's services) b) there is a real threat of the patient harming someone after leaving the office (call the police)
/r/MensRights30/01/13 07:33 PM
8

And I missed the yup.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:44 PM
3

I honestly can't follow what you're saying, you may want to rephrase it. It could be me, but it could be you just as easily.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:44 PM
11

Your sentence there is nonsensical, but I said its a gender rights issue because if a man had maced a woman in a similar situation, he'd get his ass kicked, get arrested and imprisoned.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:34 PM
14

Brainwashing women against men isn't a gender rights issue? How?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:24 PM
32

Go and mace a woman for similar reasons and then tell me this is not a gender rights issue from your FPMIA prison cell.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:23 PM
-1

Men also work full time, non-standard work 9-5 work less emergencies so PP is going a piss poor job at preventative medicine.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 06:39 PM
11

And sometimes Machete totes an opportunity!
/r/seduction07/01/13 04:22 AM
7

Or she could go into one of many other stimulating fields that interests her the most. No one needs to go into anything. It's that kind of thinking that made idiots think that more women need to do "X" and cause this problem in the first place.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:35 AM
14

I hate when my privacy is invaded in public.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 04:44 PM
2

ITT: a bunch of bitter ass holes.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 07:14 AM
33

There are battles to be fought. This is not one of them.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:24 AM
1

A comment after 4 weeks? I'm impressed.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:27 AM
4

Would you be interested if you were told you were a pedophile for wanting to work with children?
/r/MensRights17/12/12 05:33 PM
53

Those who want equality do not segregate.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:00 PM
6

You know who else got results? Hitler!
/r/seduction11/12/12 08:21 AM
2

You're suggesting bigotry exists without ignorance?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:34 AM
-5

Pressuring attached women is the definition of beta.
/r/seduction10/12/12 05:13 AM
15

This is the dumbest shit I have ever seen. In many sports, a good high school team will dominate a women's national team. Are you suggesting that high school players are more practised than women's national team. It's so much more than social conditioning.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:14 AM
28

The point here is that she is also in a position of power.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:32 PM
-3

False. She is not constantly given that message. She it's being given that message by the media. If she can't grow up and ignore the media in favor of the people around her she cares about, then she IS unattractive.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:52 PM
0

Well considering 1 is 100%, yeah, it's significantly less than 1.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:28 AM
2

The AIDS resistance had not generally been reproduced in for recent studies. And the AAP is in the minority in its recommendations.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:23 AM
9

He said the risk falls to almost zero. That is false.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:11 PM
6

This is false. The risks outweigh all medical benefits.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:29 PM
2

The question is who coached a child to accuse their father of rape.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 05:28 PM
34

The 2% number is made up. 87% of people know that.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:42 PM
28

Unwanted sexual advances, men should just handle them.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:14 PM
-5

You're not even reading what I'm saying. Gender is SELF IDENTIFIED (capitalized so you don't miss it again). Sex, on the other hand, is not.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:49 PM
18

This information is so unscientific it's disgusting. Boys are bullied by boots and not girls? Where is the evidence for that? Where is the evidence for ANY statement there? And who cares why men have higher suicide rates, other than to try and address those problems. It's like the argument used for marginalizing prison rape. Convicts deserve it, they say. But no one deserves to be raped. Not convicts. Not women. Not men.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:46 PM
8

In the same way men are free never to bath or date.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:14 PM
-3

Yes. Gender is self identified. You're confusing sex and gender which are two wholly different things.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:11 PM
4

Urologists most definitely do NOT cater to only men.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 12:13 PM
8

While I do not support slut shaming, how exactly are they victims?
/r/MensRights11/11/12 04:48 PM
12

That's rather an eloquent way of putting it.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:13 AM
3

You've obviously had little contract with internet feminists.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 04:24 PM
0

May be expelled until the teacher is charged with child abuse. Because this is BY DEFINITION child abuse. Then the kids will be let off, as they should, and the teacher will be slapped on the wrist for making an avoidable mistake, as she should.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:27 PM
13

No, but it's different. Hogan is a man.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:04 PM
3

There is no current risk of being punched by someone because they are not currently punching you. Right...
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:07 AM
17

*Amberlamps
/r/MensRights14/10/12 11:47 PM
1

I do not find it acceptable for someone to state they would only be treated by a doctor of the same sex. I do, however, agree they might trust a same sex doctor more (really, it's human nature to trust those like you more) and be more forthcoming with information on more sensitive subjects, so I'm cool if people seek out same sex doctors.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 12:50 AM
12

There is a huge difference: discriminating against men is acceptable.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 12:47 AM
1

And of it's not, then it's exploitation of women. If not that, it puts unreasonable expectations on women. If not that, it leaves women feeling unwanted. But, all in all, fuck men. /S
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:53 PM
0

It was pretty weird. Sounds like the girl is understanding of a very word comment.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 10:55 AM
20

Um, at this point, only you can friends zone yourself. She ain't just coming over because she likes video games.
/r/seduction06/10/12 04:06 PM
10

All our laws are written with women as the weaker sex. The laws are as sexist as shit.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:43 AM
1

You soun a but paranoid. That happen often when you drink? May want to drop booze.
/r/seduction16/09/12 11:44 PM
5

The female doctor thing is actually actually a real problem in female dominated specialties such as OB/GYN, but one that does not get discussion because of the PC issues.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:13 PM
0

The female doctor thing is actually
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:11 PM
2

You realize he's basically parroting some women and how they talk about men and rape, right?
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:27 PM
17

It's not 2 days too late. It's a relationship too late.
/r/seduction26/08/12 09:07 PM
2

Your logic is fucking idiotic.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 08:01 PM
18

Horrific in adolescence, acceptable in infancy. Yup, that makes sense.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 06:52 PM
1

Frogma is an asshole, but he ain't dumb or ignorant.
/r/seduction10/08/12 03:49 PM
5

Why is there no title ix for college admission. Because the whole concept is bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 12:36 AM
7

Only because of the Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:00 AM
2

If the roles were reversed, only the admin would be banned.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 10:57 AM
6

Willful ignorance is not misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:45 AM
13

Name calling, sans facts.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 02:10 AM
3

Smaller scale discrimination. It's like not segregating blacks at school, but giving then their own water fountains.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:47 PM
5

I'm assuming what you're really asking is for a place with egalitarian laws. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:42 PM
2

Haha, IF?
/r/MensRights04/06/12 03:13 PM
16

Amazon.com
/r/MensRights04/06/12 03:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter