TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wastelandmyth Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by wastelandmyth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Any gender may abort (given local laws) a fetus without consulting the non pregnant parent. Parental rights only occur after birth. Let's say a man is impregnanted by a woman. The man can terminate the pregnancy without the woman's say so.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 10:00 PM
1

No, it is actually the entire point. No one, regardless of gender, may compel anyone, regardless of gender to abort or surrender parental rights. All genders are capable of compelling partners, regardless of gender, for child support. As gender is not a factor, there is no gender based discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:06 PM
1

A man can carry a pregnancy to term despite the wishes of his partner and persure child support payments. Thus, they have equal rights.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:32 PM
1

Men have access to adoption and safe harbor. I've already brought this up.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:27 PM
1

I'm not the one making the claim. You are claiming legal discrimination. I am saying that you are wrong. You have to provide compelling evidence. All I have to do is show your arguementation is incorrect. That is the Burden of Proof. I can present you with cases of women being compelled to pay support when they dont want the child to show that both genders face compelled child support.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:18 PM
1

Show me the law, then. Should be pretty easy as you have asserted it a dozen times. Show me any law that bars a man from terminating his pregnancy but allows a woman to keep hers. Show me any law that forbids a woman from paying child support. It does not exist. There is no legal discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:09 PM
1

All genders are allowed this. Thus, it is not inequality.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:00 PM
1

You have failed to provide any evidence for this claim. You are simply asserting it over and over again. There is no law you can find to support your legal claim that women have any right over men. Men can terminate their own pregnancy. Men can collect child support. As every gender is supported the same, your claim of inequality is false.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 07:25 PM
1

Which, as I've pointed out a dozen times now. They have. There is no gender specific law that prevents a man from terminating their pregnancy. Nor is there a law that prevents a man from receiving child support. As these laws don't exist and you have.not.provided any evidence of them, I assume you were told this and didn't bother researching it. Otherwise, you would have provided some support. Also, saying nothing can change your mind is not the mental flex you think it is. You have turned this …
/r/MensRights25/06/25 07:11 PM
1

Yes, my comment was in regards to your value statement about finding it morally incorrect to sacrafice.your body in labor for someone you don't want to. The fact that you are okay doing so in other circumstances means this is special pleading. You are trying to say that this instance is different and that you continue to claim that it is due to gender discrimination. Except I have shown repeatedly that it is not. All genders have equal access to abortion. All genders have equal access to child s…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 06:57 PM
1

If you are opposed to being forced to use your body to support people without your choice, then you need to abdonon civilization. You are already being compelled to labor to support people you don't want to. That is the fundamental cornerstone of living in a community. Also, as you have not produced any legal precdent of discrimination based on gender, i can conclude you probably dont actually care enough about this to do any work regarding it. You just want to feel righteous anger for that dopa…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 06:47 PM
1

Ok, so you are absolutely not reading my posts at all. If a man falls pregnant, he can choose to terminate the pregnancy. That right is not based on gender but instead the right to bodily autonomy. No gender has the right to avoid child support. You are flat-out incorrect.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 06:39 PM
1

Ok, so you are absolutely not reading my posts at all. If a man falls pregnant, he can choose to terminate the pregnancy. That right is not based on gender but instead the right to bodily autonomy. No gender has the right to avoid child support. You are flat-out incorrect.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 06:33 PM
1

Find the law stating that this only applies to men. The only thing I could find even remotely close to gendered language in american family law was the state of michigan, and that is almost universally understood to be wrong. If you are a man and get custody, you get compelled child support from the non custodial parent, regardless of gender. You are speaking about things you do not understand and are parroting talking points you've heard elsewhere because they allow you to think that your anger…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 06:18 PM
1

So, are you just not reading my responses? There is not one single scrap of family law in any state that says men have to be responsible for unplanned children. The law is about custody and parentage. Again, if a man falls pregnant, they have the same rights as a woman or a non binary individual. Until you address this fact, you're arguements are not moving forward.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 05:31 PM
1

Good to know you either did not read my post or are transphobic. If a man falls pregnant, they have all the same rights as a woman. If a man is the sole custodian of the child, they can terminate parental rights, just like a woman. If a woman loses custody of the child, she is forced to pay child support. Patriarchy has rotted your brain to believe things that are not true.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 05:02 PM
1

It is not a gender thing. If a man falls pregnant, they have all the same rights as a woman does. The situation is that the "inequality" being discussed does not address the needs of the child to be cared for. Both genders have the same rights to be a prinary caregiver to the child and collect support from the other. Both genders have the right as a sole custodian to terminate their parental rights. What you are demanding is that a primary caregiver be forced to make a choice to either engage wi…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 04:53 PM
1

Counter arguement: Until men can be compelled to undergo the sometimes permanent physical and mental alterations of growing a child and bringing it into this world. Men will have significantly greater rights and freedoms than women do.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 03:56 PM
1

No. Were a man pregnant, they would have that option.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 03:00 PM
1

This argument is conflating two unrelated things. Someone has to support the child. The individual with custody (regardless of sex) gets support from the other. The individual who physically bears the child has the right over their body (for now) regardless of gender. If a man has sole custody over the child, they have access to adoption and safe harbor. If you don't want fiscal responsibility of the child, don't work, I guess. You can not be imprisoned due to debt. This entire thread is a child…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 02:20 PM
1

No, I get it. Hence, my first proposition of a universal childcare and child support system. Under the current system, someone has to pay for that child. You might as well be arguing that it is unfair that anyone has to pay for any child and that children should pull themselves up by their boot straps. Also, not liking the sexism inherent in this argument. Men can also get custody and child support. Men have access to adoption and safe harbor. A man with a uterus has equal access to abortion
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:04 AM
-1

If the man has sole custody, he can terminate his parental rights, just like a woman. If the woman signs up for adoption/safe harbor, the man defaults to stole custody. The only ethical alternative to the current child support system is to have a universal child support fund that all single parents can access paid for by taxes. That seems way better than "financial abortion" holly shit.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 02:44 AM
1

You are stating that you could present evidence, but you haven't. This makes me very doubtful that you have any idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 05:24 AM
0

Care to give an example or make an argument?
/r/MensRights13/06/25 07:59 PM
0

So this is a classic example of "whataboutism" wherein you've attempted to derail a conversation about a topic by claiming it is both unimportant to discuss and also highlighted an area with much more severe examples of patriarchy. Neither points, of course, have any relevance to what I was talking about. I can care both about patriarchy in other places as well as here. The difference is that the core values of the United States, as expressed in the constitution, are equality and justice. A patr…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 06:34 PM
1

There are different intensities of patriarchy. Every president in this country has been a man. No uniquely "male" right has been the center of political debate in the way that "female" reproductive rights are. S.A. and assault rates are skewed heavily towards women as the victims. Men are the victims of toxic propganda from birth targeting what activities and emotions they are allowed to engage with. This propaganda towards toxic masculinity directly benefits older men in our society. Thus patri…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter