TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wastelandmyth Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by wastelandmyth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Any gender may abort (given local laws) a fetus without consulting the non pregnant parent. Parental rights only occur after birth. Let's say a man is impregnanted by a woman. The man can terminate the pregnancy without the woman's say so.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 10:00 PM
1

No, it is actually the entire point. No one, regardless of gender, may compel anyone, regardless of gender to abort or surrender parental rights. All genders are capable of compelling partners, regardless of gender, for child support. As gender is not a factor, there is no gender based discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:06 PM
1

No. Were a man pregnant, they would have that option.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 03:00 PM
1

No, I get it. Hence, my first proposition of a universal childcare and child support system. Under the current system, someone has to pay for that child. You might as well be arguing that it is unfair that anyone has to pay for any child and that children should pull themselves up by their boot straps. Also, not liking the sexism inherent in this argument. Men can also get custody and child support. Men have access to adoption and safe harbor. A man with a uterus has equal access to abortion
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:04 AM
-1

If the man has sole custody, he can terminate his parental rights, just like a woman. If the woman signs up for adoption/safe harbor, the man defaults to stole custody. The only ethical alternative to the current child support system is to have a universal child support fund that all single parents can access paid for by taxes. That seems way better than "financial abortion" holly shit.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 02:44 AM
1

You are stating that you could present evidence, but you haven't. This makes me very doubtful that you have any idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 05:24 AM
0

Care to give an example or make an argument?
/r/MensRights13/06/25 07:59 PM
0

So this is a classic example of "whataboutism" wherein you've attempted to derail a conversation about a topic by claiming it is both unimportant to discuss and also highlighted an area with much more severe examples of patriarchy. Neither points, of course, have any relevance to what I was talking about. I can care both about patriarchy in other places as well as here. The difference is that the core values of the United States, as expressed in the constitution, are equality and justice. A patr…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 06:34 PM
1

There are different intensities of patriarchy. Every president in this country has been a man. No uniquely "male" right has been the center of political debate in the way that "female" reproductive rights are. S.A. and assault rates are skewed heavily towards women as the victims. Men are the victims of toxic propganda from birth targeting what activities and emotions they are allowed to engage with. This propaganda towards toxic masculinity directly benefits older men in our society. Thus patri…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter