~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.Welcome to the world of a distractable person looking for ways to procrastinate, and doing so marvelously, since I have a reddit tab open. Thats probably why Im behind on my work, I browse too much reddit. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/13 01:34 AM |
| -1 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.See some of the replies that I just made to Brontosaurus_Bukkake, I apologize I did not write adequate replies because I feel rushed since I am procrastinating while being here anway, but ended up replying a shit ton because all these comments give me more opportunity to procrastinate. I study neuroscience (which is why in one of my comments I said link 17 is bullshit, and it just got downvoted, oh well .. people can believe what they want) And I do understand the interplay of publication. I was… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/13 05:22 PM |
| 0 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.Duly noted. I actually dont have any interest in mensrights specifically, but science yes. And I saw a link to this on the front page, opened it, looked at some of the articles randomly, and quickly realized, this doesnt add up. And because of my lack of time, I didnt explain that properly nor support my argument. Its not that I dont owe them the time of an explanation, I dont have time right now ...I have finals this week and cant distract myself further, Ive already pushed all my free days ove… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/13 05:19 PM |
| -2 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.I did feel like bringing up a fault from an old post was an attack on self rather than an attack on my arugument currently. And I Agree with you everything you said. I shouldnt reply when I dont have the time to reply to every comment and point raised afterward with adequate detail | /r/MensRights | 08/05/13 05:16 PM |
| 1 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.Na. If you read that nature article, and all the referenced articles, then read the AAP article, youll see how many times AAP contradicts even themselves. And if you read all the links posted by OP (op of the comment I replied to) they are not 100% casual relationship proof of what he is saying. It is indeed peer reviewed, but not in super scholarly journals, an the data/methods are shaky. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/13 05:14 PM |
| 2 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.No thats not what I said, twist my words as you like.. I dont feel like arguing | /r/MensRights | 08/05/13 05:12 PM |
| -5 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.Many times on reddit, I do feel like I am taking to little kids regarding topics that I am well versed in. Because those are the types of comment replies you get; those of children. And I say scientist because that is the context I was using. I do research. By definition, that is something a scientist does. I wanted to be broad. Also I wanted to get at making the point to differentiate between clinician and scientist, but never got around to it. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/13 01:46 AM |
| -8 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.No actually I acknowledged that I was wrong, it was indeed peer reviewed. I still stand by what I said regarding equality. Theres a reason they have impact factors and rankings for journals. Its not that I am careless and unphased, I simply know how this would play out. Im the type of person who would seriously sit down and address each and every single point made in a comment, with appropriate links and sources in my reply. I KNOW that would take me >30 mins. Because ive done it before. I say I… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/13 01:43 AM |
| -12 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.I agree with you. It is my fault for not having double checked the authenticity of that before posting it. Has nothing to do with this thread though. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 11:25 PM |
| -15 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.I specifically replied and said that I was wrong. I had copied that from a website after hearing it in person previously. Upon further reserach I found it to be incorrect. Dont use ad hominem techniques to refute what I am saying. And I reply because I its human nature. At least thats how I am. Type A, impulsive. Easily distracted. Ill shoot out a reply if it takes me <5 mins or so, but I wont spend serious time into a well thought out reply while I have other things on my mind. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 11:13 PM |
| -21 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.lol. like I care about imaginary points. You should pat yourself on the back, for having all those upvotes. Man, when you find the karma bank that converts upvotes into something tangible, let me know... Ill start making an effort to pander to the hivemind and collect karma rather than comment whatever I deem necessary. You can mock my scientific background all you want, the fact that most of the links you cited are from small time journals corroborates that the research has not been reproduced … | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 11:09 PM |
| -22 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.You're right I should drop everything Im doing and make a serious attempt to point out all the flaws in your post. /s I would end up writing a post longer than yours, which would cost me time, not to mention the time spent looking up articles of actual value and linking them. because you're oh so busy. I am indeed. Have a good day sir. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 11:01 PM |
| -21 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.When I make a mistake I do correct it. I dont post bullshit. And I am indeed busy. How is 48 hours really old? That post was yesterday. I tend to get on reddit when I procrastinate other work. So yes, I really dont have time to spend arguing. But I end up clicking every blue link because I have a bad habit of distracting myself. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 10:56 PM |
| -10 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.Because of this Nature 488, 568 (30 August 2012) doi:10.1038/488568a Natures Impact factor is >20 36. Come at me bro edit: alot more than 20. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 09:11 PM |
| -11 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.Not really, go see my other replies | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 09:09 PM |
| -2 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.The AAP found that, in addition to preventing sexually transmitted infections, circumcision could reduce the rates of urinary tract infections and penile cancer, probably because the foreskin harbours infectious microbes as well as the immune cells targeted by HIV. The most common complications of circumcision — oozing, bleeding and infection — occur in 2% or fewer circumcisions and are easily treated. More serious complications are exceedingly rare, says Diekema. Each circumcision that is not p… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 09:08 PM |
| -13 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.I do admit, I was mistaken. It is indeed peer reviewed. Again, not all peer review is equal. See link below. Somebody actually posted an actual prestigious journal article https://pay.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1dujv5/feminists_continue_to_promote_male_genital/c9uc8jo | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 09:05 PM |
| -13 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.HERE WE GO. SOMEBODY LINKING TO A FUCKING NATURE, 2012 | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 09:05 PM |
| -9 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.However, uncircumcised men appear slightly more likely to experience sexual dysfunctions, | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 08:39 PM |
| -12 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.You are mistaken sir. See my reply above, link for the lazy Not all peer review is equal. Impact factor of ~2 =/= 10+ And the article is dated 1997 EDIT- Heres something from the more recent times, published in a journal whose impact factor is >30. Nature 488, 568 (30 August 2012) doi:10.1038/488568a try again. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 08:27 PM |
| -13 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.Again, I dont have much time, I should be studying. But I cannot resist an offer to procrastinate. I will point out one instance of fault. Link 13, quote: RESULTS: We find no significant differences between circumcised and uncircumcised men in their likelihood of contracting sexually transmitted diseases. However, uncircumcised men appear slightly more likely to experience sexual dysfunctions, especially later in life. Finally, we find that circumcised men engage in a more elaborated set of sexu… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 08:22 PM |
| -10 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.I dont have time to dissect them at the moment, but there were statements in both the first and second articles that simply do not equate with the title of the links he provides. If anything, I recall reading quite a few articles that circumcision actually has more positives than negatives. Not to mention most of the studies cited are like.. pre-2000, some are far back as the 60s and 70s. Why no new articles mate? I have two finals that I am preparing for. Crunch time. I will update with sources… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 08:16 PM |
| 38 | Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation.Im calling bullshit. My time is limited, so I picked 3 links at random. 13, 15, and 16. As a scientist, I dont read editorialized titles. I went to the articles and looked them over, only those 3. The first two you either misinterpreted the results/findings/conclusion, or you are blatantly making up claims and linking to articles that refute what you say. The third one is not a scientific peer reviewed article, but excessively tweaked analysis of various different studies altogether. Guys dont j… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 07:34 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter