TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wateroclock Archive

View 3 posts and 598 comments by wateroclock on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Well, FDS reminds me of the sigma male meme. You aren't a lone wolf warrior, you're a loser trying to cope with lack of social skills. You aren't an amazing woman deserving the best men, the kind of men you deserve are exactly those who you get because you're their match, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 02:55 AM
–

If a girl isn't good enough to warrant effort of the guy's part, her thinking all men fuck like that all the time is delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 08:54 PM
1

You mix up intelligence with character with exams. They aren't the same. Look at he bell curve distribution of IQ, the best proxy of real intelligence that's in our brains. Men are the ones who are selected for or against their intelligence. Women tend to be more average, men tend to be smarter or dumber. It's harder to find a woman who's an outlier either way. Be it red piller or anybody else, a woman's intelligence matters less because of that, what matters more is her character as there's mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 03:57 PM
7

Porn is selling fantasies, not reflecting desires accurately. Just like movies, it’s what people generally want to see, but not do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 04:30 PM
13

Where did you get the idea that porn is a good source to use? Does porn explain anything at all, ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 04:08 PM
10

You can read the scale, but you're afraid that other people notice you look worse because of too many burgers and sodas. And female egos can't survive honest appearance feedback, that's why it's a meme that you should always lie. Point is, if you're that sure women should be less nice to men, know what you'll get in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 05:05 PM
8

If someone's on a date and getting a blowjob feels like a shit test, that guy must have too many red pills up his ass, lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 04:49 PM
11

Okay, this is it. Men, from this on never lie when she asks if she put on weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 04:45 PM
1

If his only priority was to reproduce. But if the man wanted to make children with the best genetic match, while she was young, he lost. "Chad" can settle down in his 30's with a gorgeous&intelligent woman in her early 20's and knock her up to have kids who will easily outcompete "beta's".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 11:23 PM
5

It is correct that most influential fashion brands were created by men. By men who got successful by serving their female customers -- I can assure you that the husbands weren't the ones picking the clothes, and we know how the market works. This is what you should understand. If men do something for women, it doesn't mean they do it to configure their sexuality. After all, then women would be, by your logic, the ones shaping male sexuality because women are the suppliers of sexual services. Alw…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 10:43 PM
1

I mean, 6 years is not a short amount of time. And some women let themselves go after giving birth. Some have issues with their sexuality after. Becoming a mother brings many challenges that reflect on the husband. For some that's additional bonding, for some goes the shitty road.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 01:23 AM
49

You say that women are advantaged in social life overall, and your proof is demographically skewed dating sites. This seems to be the source of your misunderstanding of sexual dynamics as you exaggerate the difference in "value" men and women have. Have you actually seen average women with rich social lives who didn't put effort into keeping up with friends, congratulating them irl or on social media on special occasions, not giving small presents etc.? Women do work harder on all of that and mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 10:57 PM
5

Society won't become healthier following your solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 07:42 PM
2

Women do not choose to outcast incels. They simply don't want them because they are not desirable. Men didn't set the stage, the stage defined where human impulses would lead us when it comes to relationships. You assume this room for choice, but it only exists on paper. It's exactly like telling fat people to stop eating. "Hey, fatsos, our country is obese enough!" -- what does you telling them do? Does the food and the cravings *poof* and go away? Most impulsive eaters know they have a problem…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 07:27 PM
1

Dodge? This is ridiculous. There is no cabal conspiring to make the houses bigger. People want bigger houses. The market does respond to demand. The thing is, houses grew significantly because people can afford bigger houses and people buy them more often than before. That is good. Sure, an average person does need more education to get a career. An issue of automation. But an average person can afford these four or five years of college. It's not to say this slight delay before entering the lab…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 07:10 PM
3

You keep identifying causes of issues of some men and women as reasoned choices. "Haha just reason another choices, men and women! Fix it yourself!" That's not how it works. Stupid men and men will always gravitate towards the kinds of issues you describe in our environment that is disconnected from extended families and community pressures. Some rare individuals among them may be better, but that is it. Women knew about male libidos well before modern times, but most of these women couldn't jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 06:59 PM
4

There are also stupid impulsive men, contrary to intelligent men with self control. And men have much higher libidos, that lowers the bar for women. It's not a choice, it's our biological reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 06:01 PM
8

Can you stop with the rationalizations, OP? It's gotten really silly by the end of the post. Men should! Women should! Men better! Women better! Like, do you not realize that a lot of these pumped and dumped women are stupid? Yes, people are not equal, and since impulsivity correlates with intellect, it's no surprise that trashy people are left with trashy consequences. And it's not a matter of choice as much as you think. There are picky women, and there are very slutty women. And then this beh…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 05:54 PM
-2

Price per square foot adjusted for inflation has remained the same while real incomes have risen. Your average citizen has an easier time of affording a house now if they want to. Back then people married earlier and needed to buy houses earlier in life for their families with children, that's not a reflection of a better economy -- it was significantly worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 04:50 PM
0

The latest study, titled, Fatherhood Is Associated with Increased Infidelity and Moderates the Link between Relationship Satisfaction and Infidelity finds that fatherhood is so predictive of infidelity that it moderated the association between relationship satisfaction and infidelity insofar that only in non-fathers reduced relationship satisfaction was associated with infidelity. And the study correctly cautions to interpret the findings hastily, it's a limited design and the "association" tell…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 04:03 PM
-2

The myth of bad economy is ridiculous and should stop. It comes from extremist propaganda that uses dishonest data points. Quality of life in the West has only risen in recent decades. All income brackets have grown in real dollars -- people can afford more than before. There are a few things that stagnated indeed -- the proportionate price for rent or mortgages is about the same (not worse), and in the US medical bills and education have become more expensive, but that's pretty much it. And tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 03:47 PM
0

I don't need your narrative because it's useless. Atomization of individuals because of how the economy progressed, forever rising appetites for expanding the consumer base, birth control all explain it without redundant storytelling.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 01:11 PM
8

That's a non-functional narrative. "And then women got freer!" What exactly does that mean? The reality was contraception and urbanization, both making casual sex easier, free from consequences and eyes of the family.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 12:53 PM
2

I am subbed to like 4 out-of-reach people who don't post hourly/daily, and I check IG once a day. It's a nice little bonus. Maybe the issue you have is too much social media, as that causes this specific fatigue? You know, if you refresh your feed very often, the content will skew people who upload more often, and that's rarely regular people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:23 AM
1

I'd estimate a point on the 10 point attractiveness scale to be worth about $25k if status related to the wealth level is properly signaled. There was a study on this question, but in relation to just height, and it was about ~$10k per inch up to a point?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:10 AM
8

To make conclusions such as yours you need to control for many other factors to isolate the importance of actual, not just reported, levels of domestic violence against men or women and the relationship between that and divorce rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:07 AM
0

It depends on you. Feel jealous? Not good. It's an inspiration or you enjoy the beauty? It's probably just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:02 AM
14

I think you're wrong in that bisexuals can't be masculine. It's the sexual behavior that irks you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 07:52 PM
15

I already explained that it’s not a rational opinion. It’s about the unconscious response.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 07:32 PM
47

Despite what modern western morals tell you, most straight people do not like non-straight people. Genuinely. I don't mean a made up opinion, or an opinion inherited from parents or picked up at school. I mean the kind of dislike that exists instinctually, even if the socialized part of the person is "LGBT accepting". It's a degree or repulsion, which is why so many apparently "progressive" women go simply "ew" at the thought of intimate contact when encountering a real bisexual men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 06:38 PM
2

No, for a bisexual woman finding a good woman is usually too much work. They most often get to date men. It’s not right to compare male and female smvs head to head because their experiences and expectations of them are way too different.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 01:29 PM
1

Feminism is all about dropping responsibilities or standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 01:26 PM
3

Romance is also transactional. Everything is, even if only in part, the question is whether it's worth it and how genuinely motivated it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 12:04 PM
2

Women (on average) work more than men do. Not in work-work, but if you combine actual work hours plus self reported home chores etc. There are more women in the workplace It's weird that you jump from the UK to the US like that just to grab a relevant stat. It's a 50/50, and it's irrelevant when it comes to conversations about women's work while in relationships. Women working and women working while in relationships are two different things. I'd add more if you had more consistency, but I can a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 12:02 PM
1

There are millions of upper middle class people who do it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 04:22 AM
2

I don't know what exactly "your attention again" means, but if I get you right, my wife showing initiative does it well. In the beginning of most relationships it's men who lead. And as things cool down, it's vital to shift this to an enjoyable back and forth. "Tonight I want you and it will be about your pleasure first" is about the thing almost any husband wants, whether it's secretly or not. Couples are supposed to be special to each other, acting like it helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 04:20 AM
3

Women do not work equal hours. Far more women than men in relationships and marriages do not work at all. It is not harder for them to maintain or lose weight, it's only harder to gain muscles. As for how hard it is to be at a healthy weight range, not at all. Don't eat all day, don't eat huge amounts of unhealthy food, don't be sedentary to the point of getting back or other pain, and you will be in the range of "very fuckable" by most men's standards. Add increased energy levels and better men…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 04:16 AM
1

Yes, but only if the environment changes. In highly urban ones it's just not practical to ignore OLD. If society shifts from perpetual urban growth to expansion of the countryside, there people would be more inclined to rely on their locals for dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 03:54 PM
4

The kind of partner you can get reflects your status. If someone is status insecure, regardless of gender, they wouldn't want to pair up with or flaunt someone below their bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 03:52 PM
0

If a man believes in traditional gender roles and follows his part of the deal, providing and protecting, if divorce is the outcome of the marriage, he deserves an equal claim to the child. Being the mother who is closer to children doesn't make a woman the better parent for the general future.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 03:58 AM
1

The answer is never making up copes, but to accept reality. What we have is the consequence of urbanized environments with fast connectivity. Each time changes of the environment of great magnitude happen, species change. Individuals and family trees die out. Humans are good at shaping environments, but we have a taboo on shaping ourselves. Either accept eugenics and make the change less painfully at the expense of morality as we know it, or stop whining to make our feeds more positive because i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 03:54 PM
1

Paywalled study, but how does it evaluate happiness? Reporting it to a valuable standard is hard. It may be that a husband’s handsomeness compensates for fewer romantic gestures compared to an uglier one really well. But that may not be reflected because of the happiness scale design. To be more clear, imagine a study on attractiveness of the man and his likelihood to agree to watch a movie or a show that his woman picks. If you survey the women, because of the study’s focus you’d see more “happ…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 12:08 PM
2

These are all important, but trying to equalize different traits like this is like looking at burger selling and banks and trying to say “burger shop’s liquidity is equal to regulations on interest rates in terms of importance!”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 08:05 AM
5

You know society is fucked up when casual sex is valued more than having children. Children are the future, they are most important by definition of life itself. But here's a thing, "husband material" men may attract women, but not the best kinds. Notice how you describe this "material" man like. Very materialistically. House, money, safety from risk, good citizen! Truly, an outstanding individual, with no individuality. And I'm not all "be unique! be YOU!" -- that's just cringe, but this just s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/21 11:22 PM
2

These men a fit, well groomed, competent, popular. Not a rp man, but isn't it obvious?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/21 02:42 PM
5

Sex crimes and violent crimes started decreasing in the 1990s, if I remember it right. That's because birth rates were on decline to non-replacement levels since 70's, resulting in 90's that had fewer young people as a proportion of the population. Fewer young people = fewer crimes of all types.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/21 09:55 AM
2

There aren't many people who even know who "pick me" girls are. And those who do know, who are they? What's their average age, what's their relationship status etc.? I'd like to know the answer, but we don't. And if I am to guess, there are "tribes" of these women who have very strong opinions on what's okay or not to do when appealing to men (some even think it's oppressive to cater). They're kinda like this small online community, if you can call it that way, of men who legitimately believe th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 10:17 PM
3

They think it's analogous to men who settle for single moms or sluts. That is, "pick me" girls are like men who submit to the other gender's "virtuous partner" fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 08:32 PM
3

You mention "emotional labor" as something women do more, but what is it? As far as I know, men tend to keep themselves more stoic, and its their job to be their gf's or wife's "emotional worker". That is if you mean being the emotional support. Women do not want men who complain and men are more reserved on the surface for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 08:29 PM
22

That's somewhat exceptional, the possibility to date to actually "share" the men is very slim. Everybody knows it's just sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 10:14 PM
1

Extroverted men who will become abusive, but aren’t at the moment > shy men
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 06:03 PM
7

This perspective doesn’t seem to be very true. What I’ve noticed is it’s lower class people who tend hop from person to person, while it would be logical for them to seek stability. On the other hand, middle class or upper middle class people are in lasting relationships. That is backed by statistics of stable marriages and income. So, financial means to be free do not lead to promiscuity or a higher number of partners, that seems to positively relate with the more traditional deal. As for your …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 02:04 PM
2

There is no scientific case to be made about true sapiosexuality -- it appears to be a made up self-identity. But I think it's not wild to think that some level of intelligence is required to keep sexual interest in a partner. It's not that the more intelligent someone is, the more attractive they are, but people commonly have a cutoff for an acceptable level of intelligence below which sexual desire dies very fast. That may not be attraction to intelligence itself, but having intelligence of a …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/21 02:08 PM
1

My heartbeat told me which shies to wear one day. Can relate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 02:29 PM
1

We all assess partners individually. We don’t date categories of people. We can learn about personal values and all other compatibility signs. That’s the purpose of dating. Associating just age without accounting for many, many more factors with divorce risk is just ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 11:38 AM
2

Socialization? Now that’s a real reach. Socialization is not happening with blank slates. You won’t condition women to be more ballsy and hornier, have a lower disgust barrier, not having pregnancy as a concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 11:23 AM
1

It’s also how the abundance is created because of biological differences between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 06:22 AM
1

That’s wrong. Your biology expresses itself differently in different environments. Thing is, you can’t mandate an environment where human females will suddenly approach a ton.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 05:54 AM
1

This brings up a much broader point: it is all too easy to assume that men and women behave very differently because of evolved, inborn differences. Just because you constructed an environment with rules that differ from the real world by a fair bit and get different behavioral patterns doesn't mean that you've challenged biology. Point is, the world will not arrange itself absolutely arbitrarily, we follow what's convenient and comfortable. The differences in psychological profiles of the avera…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 07:29 PM
3

Sexist blame games.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 04:34 AM
28

Women go outside and take the risk of being raped or stalked or groped because the benefits of going outside (making money, meeting up with friends, getting food and the list goes on and on) out weights the perceived risk, how big or small it may be. Was this written seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 05:12 AM
9

Both are mostly sick people. Normal and functional types are very rarely engaging with the paid sex market. And among those who do the overwhelming majority are people with typical low class issues like lacking intelligence, low impulse control, substance abuse etc. A lot of these people can't even get proper frienships.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 05:38 PM
20

I think most of the verified women who post there for no material reward are just porn addicts. Maybe not literally -- but looking through the posts now, I can clearly recognize that the way sexuality is expressed is very much porn inspired. I think most people would agree that such expressions of sexuality and the language have little to do with genuine sexual experiences and how we perceive and remember them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 02:44 PM
11

That’s if you think that the sexual marketplace is limited to hookups. But no, almost every woman wants a relationship. That is a relationship with a man. Where they gave sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 03:29 AM
7

Maybe the amount of well paid prostitutes will be reduced. Maybe that will mean more of these people looking for stability in relationships. But since only a small fraction make good money there (I’d say even half of your median wage is good money in this context), expect nothing major.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/21 12:09 PM
–

Do you know how sex works for the overwhelming majority of men and women? Women are submissive. Doesn't mean they always do nothing, or that they can't ask for anything, or that they're degraded for it etc. They are the less active partner that willingly and happily gives most of control to the man and finds most satisfaction when things are mostly that way, their role and niche is feminine, the other half of the whole. Apply this dynamic to relationships and you got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 12:23 PM
5

Massive amounts of porn use Adjust for the strength of libido and women have the same issue. Video games What about them? More men living with their parents Women live with their parents. People move out later. Not because of money -- incomes (in real dollars) have grown for all brackets and continue to grow. They choose to do so. Why? Maybe lack of good reason to invest in property, not as many people want to create families while in their early 20's. A massive drop in male testosterone and spe…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 11:50 AM
2

That is a suggestion that's not a real suggestion. You can throw it at any societal issue and see it fail. "uh, how do we solve group x disliking group y?" "education!" "now they're educated and still hate each other"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/21 08:05 PM
6

The problem with what? People get overexposed to trashiness of others thanks to internet. Intelligent people are intelligent enough to figure it out and don't need an authoritative biased source from the government. Stupid people won't listen.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/21 07:28 PM
1

Housewives are not traditional. Maybe in upper classes of some countries. Here before WW1 all members of my family were peasants and worked. After, during Soviet times, everybody had to work and they did — most of my family were factory workers, even women (just one grandma worked in the library). And now which of the traditions am I for? Well, men in my family have always earned more, and I do so as well, but after we’re done with small kids she’s back to the labor market.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 11:09 AM
5

It’s a weak hypothesis, and if tying homosexuality to it specifically. If the idea is families where there were more free adults to help with kids got more kids or more kids survived, where are the gay genes that confirm it? The problem is, the few genes associated with homosexuality are not causal, it’s just a correlation and to this day nobody proved they’re actually relevant at all. And if you use this hypothesis with something like age instead — families with better genes for longevity got m…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 11:24 AM
–

What you brought up is just another description for traditional gender roles -- no surprises there.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 12:06 PM
3

My take is that openly sexist men are the higher testosterone ones. All people are sexist to varying degrees, but being honest about it when there’s a social stigma takes masculinity. Women love masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 07:17 PM
1

All of the human qualities are physical. Liking a woman’s ass is not categorically different from liking a woman’s comfort. Both have biological reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 01:03 PM
4

That's just the truth. Youth is priceless.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 09:56 PM
3

I know. Which is why I brought up having children. You don’t care, but it’s extremely important for most women. You are talking about sexual dynamics in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 07:09 PM
2

Most people want to have children. If you want to have children, it’s most rational to care about having the best ones possible. Early to mid 20’s is the best age for child bearing. There is no way around it. Redpillers are right, even if for wrong reasons. If you’re not an absolutely brilliant woman with a noticeable impact on your area of expertise, career can wait. Unless you’re from a poor and broken family, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 06:54 PM
17

The wall is a red pill meme? I didn't know it was, honestly. Sure, it's a meme, and it's exaggerated all the time, but it doesn't seem to be a part of what actual redpillers actually think. Yeah, women in their 30's have better chances with men in their 40's because desirable men in their 30's are good enough for 20 year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 01:03 PM
3

It’s just another aesthetic some women go for. Typical Instagram feed inspired one. You can easily find out it’s not the sole thing lots of women pursue. Your social circle may have one or another aesthetic overrepresented.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 03:13 AM
5

Did you miss the girl next door type?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 08:24 PM
1

And are you able to define that true, actual, non-media singular look?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:29 PM
5

I am not a Chad, but I am attractive, women compliment my appearance unprompted at times and I know that most men don't experience that at all, and when I was in my late teens and early 20's I had a few one night stands. Your moral of the story is bullshit. All I had to do was search for the right kind of girl who responded positively to very light sexual flirting and escalate for a date. My last fuck of that kind was with a waitress from a pizza place and we both knew that it was just sex, I we…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:14 PM
7

That is dead wrong. NA beauty standards are very diverse. Androgynous tall models are valued. Buxom, almost bimbo-like women as well. Plenty of girl next door types among top tier actresses. Alternative singers. Really, any aesthetic you can think of is really well represented.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 06:59 PM
–

Yeah, I've seen the subs FDS overlaps with. Big fucking lmao oof yikes oh no no. It's just female locker room talk of the low tiers, nothing special, not a good place to learn about women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 06:53 PM
–

That was an interesting read. I noticed that women’s issues were the only ones acknowledged. I thought this sub matured past that. How did the post get so many upvotes then? This is why conversations of this kind are unproductive. The gender balance gets tipped and people upvote what they feel is right.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 06:20 AM
2

Yeah, sure? Providing for the mother of your children while she’s pregnant and during first years of the babies is a normal idea. You jumping to B-BUT MEN GOTTA DO THIS THEN! hints at sexism though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 03:44 PM
9

Something that’s been the norm for 99% of humanity since we know is due to biology as the main factor. We’re monogamous or serially monogamous creatures.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 03:40 PM
5

That is what you are focusing on. Which is the problem. If your thoughts about having children are focused on the negatives that much, you’re scared, you don’t qualify to be a good mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 03:29 PM
2

Women who think like you are low quality. High quality women don’t think of having babies as suffering and want pregnancy themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 03:24 PM
21

Too many arbitrary assumptions in that theory. Let’s not ignore nature. The overwhelming majority of people are physically repulsed by the idea of “sharing” a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 03:21 PM
-1

Independently? Are you sure? Because if all citizens were as productive, paid taxes, worked as many hours/years as women do, the deficits would necessitate cuts on spending so severe you’d return to 50’s in a heartbeat. Male productivity is covering for female life choices. Without male productivity there can be no feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 10:26 AM
–

Don't be vague. Physical attraction is measured by 2 things. Objective beauty and aesthetic preferences. In a number of studies it was found that objective beauty is recognized universally -- people are able to tell who's hot and who's not, but aesthetic preferences are the "taste". Tastes are aesthetic preferences of what is found sufficiently objectively attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 05:10 PM
1

You do realize that this is not the point here and getting offended by a hypothetical example like this one is peak fragility?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 05:19 PM
1

If a partner hits me, I am going to punish them by withdrawing all my financial support. Less extreme: if a partner lies about being in contact with an ex, I am leaving. That is discipline. And an adult is free to not accept being disciplined in such a way. Equal-equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 10:18 AM
1

Look up the definition of discipline. People are confused about the word because they associate it with relationships such as parent-child or other dominating-subservient pairs, but it’s also applicable to equal-equal. It’s discipline when a partner doesn’t take shit like being shouted at.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 10:12 AM
1

You missed the point. It’s not about treating women like children. The goal is unwavering standards. Woman raises her voice, accuses you of something to avoid responsibility for a wrongdoing, weasels and doesn’t respect you to be direct when asked? Bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 09:52 AM
1

If you’re not getting sex where you’re genuinely desired, youre not getting real sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:41 PM
3

Why is virginity that bad of an attribute?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:20 PM
2

Fuentes clips are so reaching. “Obsessed” — he’s a virgin. Actually listen to the arguments and there’s nothing controversial.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 10:36 AM
0

This is a case when you can’t trust what women say, at all. They don’t hate being objectified. The meme of “objectification” is pathologizing of male sexuality anyway. And they don’t hate men showing off their bodies. They hate the experiences of being used by attractive men who have something to show off.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 12:17 PM
1

Beauty is objective, aesthetic preferences are subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 11:56 AM
20

Sincerely, we don’t want to spend hours a day taking and editing selfies, we don’t ask our friends to create whole galleries of us standing near some bullshit in a shopping mall, we don’t obsess over celebs to copy them, we rarely pretend we’re special princesses. What kind of profiles do women have anyway? “Tee hee I’m a slut!” “Here’s my autobiography, and don’t be ♒️.” “Entertain me.”
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 04:10 AM
2

Oh, you went back and edited your comment so that the conversation is derailed. You are wrong because all the information people need can be briefly summed up and distributed very easily. Most of the third world has access to it. They have education. Eastern European countries don't and (most of them) never had widespread sex ed of the like you're talking about, and birth rates are even lower than western ones. The only common characteristics among countries with few kids made are the level of u…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 08:39 PM
5

"Hey, teen, if you knock her up, you will have to be responsible for the kid for many years." "NO, MY PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT, THEY NEED TO LEARN MATH AND HISTORY AND BIOLOGY MORE TO GET IT!!!" So, you're barely westernized yourself, but already caught the idiotic idea that western education grants some inaccessible knowledge? Even hunter-gatherers knew about the responsibility of having children, give me a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:38 PM
-6

You don't need education to know what it means to have children. Stop being so condescending, people in poor parts of the world are not THAT stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:14 PM
1

So, true nature, or "Male ego drives all and it’s not grounded in biology"? See why it's impossible to take your "theory" seriously? It's an incoherent mess. Work on it, bring us v.2.0 in a week or so.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 05:18 PM
1

from Gates to Epstein Now that's good range of men to base your "theory" on. You base this all on celebrities, historical figures, rappers, billionaires, and then extrapolate their experience with women of their status (most people mingle within theirs) onto everybody else? Men care about status, the evidence says they do so much less than women do. That's the reasonable take.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 04:38 PM
2

I love these posts. I am not a red pill guy, but I understand them and their ideas well. And what's obvious to me and red pillers is you have no argument. Go on, OP, describe what you thing "the ritual" is. What is it that redpillers specifically do that you judge, what are the tactics?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 01:57 PM
5

Since you're asking redpillers, I am going to answer as a redpiller would, although I am not one of them. But I am reading one of the "redpilled" Rollo Tomassi books Redpillers believe most men to be alphas or betas. Alphas are inherently more attractive to women, even if they are dirt poor, betas not so much. Betas have to compensate by becoming providers. The nature of hypergamy is such that women ideally want to get the perfect man who would be an alpha (attractive, confident, self determined…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/21 08:06 PM
9

Women don't work as many years. Men are better taxpayers over the lifetime. Men are less likely to get degrees, but the degrees they pick are of more productive professions. The degrees got devalued, the higher female ratio doesn't really mean women are doing better. Men are not catered to by any institution. If women underperform, that's an issue. If men do, nothing is done, usually. But even if you can't judge men as necessarily doing worse by what you mentioned, more men fall out of society, …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/21 12:10 AM
5

It's a "pill" now that the more women are aware of you, the better your chances?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 09:29 AM
1

And women are soooooo interesting. What the fuck do you want? I am a lawyer. I do not have time for fancy "inspirational" hobbies. I want to be well read, I want to see good movies, being cultured in just literature and cinema takes up almost all of the free time I have. And then I work out and have other responsibilities. Sometimes I edit/make videos, but if I were to take that seriously, I'd have literally no time for any woman -- my wife would complain about no attention given to her. And the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 08:29 PM
3

Her list is: here I am, I need an attractive man who mirrors almost everything about me and behaves like a conventional "good guy" as feminists imagine. This is not who men are. Men are not feminists. Men are not so feminine in their real views on life. Men are not emotional in the way she prefers (or thinks she does -- doesn't matter). She doesn't want men. She wants a feminized pretty boy. Pretty boys can fuck better.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 02:47 PM
5

If it's universal, it's most likely due to nature or universal circumstances. Women have better social or familial support nets and they always think they have more options.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 09:34 PM
2

Do you mean becoming old and too afraid to look for sexual fulfilment? Sex is integral to happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 06:55 AM
1

Why ever do anything risky, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 12:58 PM
4

Yes, that's true, women typically say they are more satisfied with their sex lives as they age, in their 30's and 40's, if the book about sex I recently read doesn't lie. But the stats on that come from women in committed relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 10:35 AM
0

So, there is no room to grow together beyond a certain level of sexual activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 10:33 AM
4

Maybe you and your long time partner are the rare exceptions who can share genuine intimacy without jealousy for the relationships outside of just you two. Maybe. The intimacy you highlight is what can only exist between two people who are committed and know each other well, who age together. For 99% of people your other experience would make it impossible, so, my general idea applies here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 10:32 AM
2

You choose to ignore the general trend in favor of exceptions or a small percentage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 10:27 AM
3

To me your view of sex is reductionist. What is your sex life like? What makes it satisfying?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 09:30 AM
3

So, what do you consider satisfying, what is it that you do sexually fulfills you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 09:26 AM
1

Reading the 1st source, while the past 30's rise in divorce rates is analyzed well, many factors are taken into account, the teens to early 20's aren't examined thoroughly, instead you get some author's suggestions. Not accounting for reasons other than supposed "maturity" that's supposedly good for all relationships is a bad look. What about teen pregnancies and related marriages? How about accounting for intelligence and impulsivity? Because in reality 18-25 may be the objectively best time to…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 09:26 PM
5

It discusses how women have been oppressed by society to never talk about their sexual preferences and how it’s about time they’re more open about it. Women have ALWAYS gossiped about men they liked, men they dated, their past experiences, their fantasies, their preferences, their cunts, their breasts, all you can think about. "Oppressed by society" -- I am so tired of poorly socialized losers who group in their loser communities projecting their insecurities onto the whole world. Literally, FDS…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 01:29 PM
8

For as long as we existed we were either monogamists or serial monogamists. Calm your porn induced fantasies down, orgies were never normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 07:43 PM
26

It's not independence. You simply do not want responsibilities, but keep all the privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 07:42 PM
18

"The woman will probably tolerate his change in behavior for a while" Yeah, that's the problem. What's you're describing is men should do romantic things to please women, and if they don't, it's an issue. And what do men get in return for romance? Traditionally you get the woman -- full commitment with the approval of her family, for life. Now it's "do it because I feel good" without reciprocity?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 07:40 PM
1

High time preference vs. low time preference. The steppe vs. the jungle. Death, danger, faster life make people move faster and think less. Stability, more intelligent challenges of a different environment make people think ahead. It’s evolutionary. These intuitively correlate with single motherhood rates, cheating, poverty, education etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/21 06:09 AM
3

Well, that depends on appearance and status.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:10 PM
5

Reminds me of the "strong independent woman" fantasy that only a tiny fraction of women actually manage to achieve on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 07:42 PM
1

Sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 04:23 AM
-1

All of these men who you say are just coping can realistically get into upper middle class, anybody in the first world who is intelligent and wants it can. Women cannot age back, and their smv is based on youth and looks more than men's.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 11:25 AM
1

There are about as many women who want commitment and can't get it from men they want and men who want sex but can't get it from women they want. That's as much as you can truthfully say. That men gatekeep this and women that doesn't follow from this info alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 09:44 PM
5

Women are outspoken about men gatekeeping commitment. Men are outspoken about women gatekeeping sex. Both ideas are loud, and making general judgements on them alone is too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 09:11 PM
1

I've seen the rhetoric. Female chauvinism at the expanse of males is misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 04:14 PM
1

I don’t believe a word an unironic FDS poster says. You’re misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 11:38 AM
2

Freedom of choice? You don't have any more freedom of choice without enforced Christian morality. Actual moral dissidents are very, very few. Most people just follow whatever's available. So, when a young woman goes to college, she often has no choice but to be subjected to an extreme leftist bias -- that changes thinking. And what if you are a dissident and choose to be against the modern dogmas? Yes, good question, what about freedom of choice? You can't compare modern suicide rates with those…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 01:14 PM
3

That reason is economic. People follow resources more than anything else. There are more resources in big cities and other highly urbanized places. But being traditional there is not easy because the cost of living and psychological effects of being in crowded areas for long atomize individuals. That is why rural areas are pretty traditional despite the media and cultural influence. This has nothing to do with quality of ideas, really. “If liberal democracy is so good, why don’t the Chinese go f…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 12:21 PM
5

This all ignores what traditionalists propose as solutions. They aren’t worried about divorce because they believe in marriage for life made possible by the enforced religious morality. They aren’t worried about lonely sad men because traditional masculinity has plenty of ways to fraternize men in male only spaces. I could go on, but the main point is that you’re using the typical leftist dogmatic worldview and not addressing what you’re criticizing on the same grounds, fairly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 12:12 PM
15

I think OP supposed that an unattractive man hitting on a woman would be seen as creepy. That could call for white knights.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 12:05 PM
3

The pool of attractive young men willing to date down is small. There aren't many milf fetishists. Since appearance is the number one factor and money don't play a role for most men, and appearance is dependent on age a lot, this is it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 12:29 AM
1

There will always be double standards in relationships. Between everybody, that's simply a given. Think about the following: who is complaining? Who would want the world to know that they can't properly decline something with a partner? I think those complaints come mainly from people in shitty relationships, which are such likely because one or both of the partners are shitty. So, why should we really pay attention to this? Is a good looking successful guy having troubles being alone when he wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 12:23 AM
1

You've just discovered that men and women are biased when describing each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 05:11 PM
2

All we can say is based on very little, and we aren't even taking generational gaps into account. Will the same trend exist for zoomers given record high male virginity rates? Most likely no. And the graph doesn't really say anything about when people cheated. It's just age and indication that they did, so, that complicates guessing further. We have accurate idea only about the youngest age group who couldn't have cheated much earlier than the survey answer given. male infidelity doesn’t really …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 04:11 PM
2

That's a good thought, women are notoriously more nosy, they would scroll your Instagram for hours trying to find a clue if they feel slightly insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 10:42 AM
15

Supposing that the self-reporting numbers are either correct or show a correct trend in general, my first thought is libido, SMV, and age preferences. First of all, men have a significantly higher libido. Compare lesbian and gay dating. Who fucks more? Men, of course men. But why do they not cheat more in their teens/twenties? This is when men are at their lowest SMV wise. Because most aren't attractive enough for that. Plenty of young men are too broke, their careers usually pick up in their 30…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 10:40 AM
1

The same reason a real face to face conversation is much more emotional/lively than texting, usually. The more information about a person we get, and visuals and sounds play a huge role, the more our brains relate. OLD removes a ton of essential details. Which is why when I used it for dates, I always tried to get a date asap -- even the same day -- and I recommend everybody doing the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:27 PM
7

There is absolutely no need for a stereotypical and inaccurate feminist ideology world tour to define FDS. They are simply bitter cunts who can’t accept that the men they’re worth are still too good for simping.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 06:17 AM
4

Last time I checked obesity stats for western countries convinced me that women weren't that much better at being attractive. And that's not the only thing. Women typically have more issues with skin, for every man with bad hair there's a woman that made her hair bad by overdoing beauty procedures or coloring too much, an average man and an average woman dress comparatively standard and bland, I can go on. I literally have no idea where the meme that guys are worse at keeping their appearance fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 08:52 PM
–

He purposefully made himself look worse by having really bad hair, having the camera up close to distort his face, having this untidy shirt. The overwhelming majority of men don't dress like this, and those who do are so rare they don't count. Plus, what about women who dress poorly? So many with shitty styles, yet they don't struggle as much as men with style.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 08:09 PM
1

Such a nice thing that people who want kids the least will not reproduce. Then in the future even in our sick society, with our lack of care for family institutions people will want babies. After all, that's who the future is. Always.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 07:10 PM
1

That's a long way of saying that some people are destined to be filtered by life.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 07:01 PM
2

All you have to do to look good is work out like 15 minutes every other day and eat right. That takes barely any serious effort. And yeah, you have to invest a lot in the family. In return you fulfill your biological mission and don't just die out like a hedonistic loser who failed to pass on genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 06:21 PM
0

Men care about opinions of women on the topic much more for the obvious reason. Imagine trying to sell a product and your target demographic indicated they don't really want it. At the same time, men may "shame" each other for being virgins successfully, but that depends on the one shamed. Men care about resilience to banter and when they recognize that you're confident in yourself and don't give a shit, they stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 06:18 PM
3

The red pill respective is about knowledge that allows men to make better educated decisions. What individual men want to do is their business.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 06:13 PM
10

You’re also importing millions legally and illegally to compete for the jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 06:26 AM
-1

Good relationships, aren't built around love, just like good lives aren't spent in pursuit of happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 11:30 PM
3

You assume your narrative is correct because of anecdotes and conclusions out of nowhere. And this doesn't make sense because where are boys who learn to manipulate on their mothers, is that a widespread phenomenon? No, and an average boy will tell you that dealing with the mother is hundreds of times easier than attempting to bullshit your father. The thing is that dynamic between parents and kids are vastly different than dynamics in couples. It's typically easier for women to manipulate becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 08:12 PM
1

This conversation is pointless. Neoteny is praised universally, for as long as we know ourselves. It's an innate preference that has nothing to do with conscious decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 05:22 PM
1

Good, less of you in the gene pool :)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 02:32 PM
0

A man who loves lets his beloved wife to die out without fulfilling the main biological imperative! You are so correct :D
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 05:55 AM
0

Yeah, let him know.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 02:27 PM
-2

You don’t love a person with whom you don’t want to make a child. Making children and raising them well is the end goal of any worthy relationship if you’re fertile.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 06:07 AM
6

That's an advice given so that you won't bother women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 09:16 PM
0

A shame few of you took writing classes in school.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 01:48 PM
154

attractive (or dateable) women are everywhere Fuckable? Yeah. Dateable? Scarcity is very real.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 12:33 PM
2

Males are such monsters that highest rates of domestic abuse are in lesbian couples and lowest are in gay ones. Amazing how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 02:34 AM
1

This is because men typically message first. This isn't "women initiating a conversation" -- most of these must be replies to the abundant "low quality" men showing initiative. And men send more messages to more attractive women because since you're the one having to be initiative, why not initiate with better looking women?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 08:48 PM
0

Non-whites and sexual weirdos don’t have any exclusive struggles. The more bizarre it is. Just a big session of role playing not understanding how the world works.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 04:52 PM
1

If forced to pick from those, Hendricks. My “ideal” type of tall and thin with curves isn’t represented.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 12:40 PM
1

The thing I find weird is that from other studies who we find attractive seems to be genetic Isn't that agreeing with this study? Again, it did find that attractiveness rating wasn't varying from twin to twin. Aesthetic preferences aren't the same thing.
/r/BlackPillScience27/12/20 07:24 PM
29

So, people generally agree who's attractive or not to a high degree. It's which of the attractive suit your taste that gets influenced by nurture.
/r/BlackPillScience27/12/20 07:08 PM
2

Hello, PPD, my anecdote is actually a big anecdote. Sooooo?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 05:12 PM
1

Hello, PPD, here's an anecdote. What do you have to say about it, huh? Huh? Who are you to judge?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 05:06 PM
2

empirically speaking, it's historically demonstrated that men would cheat more than women No. also women are more prone to forgive an infidelity. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 04:56 PM
1

when it actually has extremely high rates of male alcoholism and suicide I won't say I know everything on the topic, but Russia and most other post-Soviet countries are survivors of one the most chaotic economic readjustments. The change of the economy for the market one they have now hit most people hard. So many productions were destroyed. A lot of cities, towns, villages etc. are reliant on certain economic activities to be considered "prosperous" and provide citizens an acceptable living sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/20 10:43 PM
0

I was arguing that banning porn was a good idea with many redditors yesterday. As you'd expect, so many brainwashed porn addicts who see almost no wrong with the industry. Plenty of countries ban production of porn and it barely exists there. All countries should be like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 09:54 PM
1

Women generally don't want to date men who put women on a pedestal. That includes caring so much about "not offending" or "behaving right". Women want real men. Men who have balls -- they aren't afraid to make a mistake. They are bold and confident, naturally. If you didn't consume feminist propaganda, you'd be overly courteous in the traditional sense or get your understanding of how you're supposed to treat women from another place and then still be anxious and unattractive. This is on you, no…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 09:24 PM
0

No. This makes no sense. The woman should do her part and spend lots of time with the kids in their early months. That’s impossible if she’s focused on a career. Depriving children of the essential bond isn’t an option for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 04:08 AM
13

Oof, OP. Time for you to learn that looks influence your ability to get friends. And your personality is inherent in many ways because things your nervous system, for example, aren't going to be fixed by le believing in yourself and being social or something like that. Yeah, having social connection helps to get women. No shit, you have to know people to have a choice of dating options, but your angle is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 09:52 PM
3

What? Someone who believes that kids are a waste also believes that the environment is worth something? Who will take care of it if people don't make intelligent babies? It's developed countries that have the most of those.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 06:31 PM
2

Consuming to live and contribute in return is fine. I genuinely do not get people like you, thinking that continuation of life is just ego stroking is such a selfish statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 05:44 PM
0

Which negative consequences are there if one person doesn't work and leech off others? It's just one person, not much, right? But we can judge. The value of life to a living being is obvious. Creating life that is partly you and that will become positive contributors to life further on is wonderful. Not contributing is obviously worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 04:54 PM
2

Having kids is an act of creation. It's always pathetic when as a counter-example of something "better" than having kids people bring up consuming. At the very least, if you won't have kids, create meaningful things, advance humanity in small ways, don't be a waste of resources that lived to be a corporate slave.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 04:51 PM
3

Not die -- die out. Reflecting the state of being of nature isn't philosophical. Nature isn't a god, it's a concept to describe what happens with life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 11:49 AM
0

Humans aren’t slaves to their instincts in the way most animals are No, we are slaves to the instincts. It's just that we are more capable of changing the environment to which we then adapt, and some humans are adapted poorly and chose the life of pursuit of cheap pleasures rather than something more eternal and meaningful. But it is all instinctual. We have no freedom to choose but from what our instincts give us.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 10:55 AM
2

You have to be intelligent to miss the point the way you do, OP. It's astonishing how disconnected from reality you are. Let me explain. It's really simple, trust me, and there are no fallacies. If you don't reproduce, you die out. You have no future. Your genes are the genes of a genetic loser. Nobody cares about philosophy -- there is no philosophy in the wild, there are only things that reproduce or become genetic dead ends. Biology tells us this very clearly. Biology is telling us that mothe…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 10:53 AM
1

All people approach when they don't want to lose a chance more than they fear doing the approaching. Blame the different sex drives, that is honestly the only factor that contributes to the gender imbalance of the number of approaches. OP's insecurity argument and your idea of what's a "right" romance for a woman are just out of nowhere substantial.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 06:08 PM
0

That's actually a lie. Women approach as much as men when you consider not the amount of approaches by gender, but genuine interest or excitement. I know more than one woman who confessed that in some social settings they went out to "hunt" for a good catch.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 05:24 PM
2

There are fat rectangulars. And getting visible musculature requires good diet and effective workouts. Just working a lot and being malnourished would make you skinny and sickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 05:04 PM
3

Wide shoulders? Flat chests? No curves? None of those are caused by diet.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 04:37 PM
1

There is little difference. People still judge or mimic. The market capitalizes on this in prosperous times, but it's just a continuation of desires that are universal.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 07:22 PM
1

Redpillers do not believe that success alone makes you a10/10 or manly and in control, it doesn't mean you're very intelligent either. Especially if we're talking about entertainers. What 10/10 typical redpiller's wet dream man would tolerate Amber Heard as much as Depp did?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 07:13 PM
2

The study is paywalled, did you read it, OP? In contrast, when targets were psychologically near, men showed less attraction toward women who outsmarted them. So, men overvalue how much they prefer high intelligence in partners when they lack experience with the trait. How is that being intimidated? Isn't it the case that most people overvalue traits other than looks?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 06:59 PM
0

Yeah, going cyberpunk on our bodies is so much easier than shaming (which worked well in the past). Thanks, capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 11:43 PM
0

This low tier shitpost again?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 03:43 PM
2

Out of those 8 billion 8 aren't my family, 8 aren't people from my city and country, aren't my ethnicity and aren't of my nationality. I don't care about those as much as I care about myself, my family, my tribe, my people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 01:22 PM
1

Shooting blanks while coping with dying out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 01:05 PM
1

Male. A life of virtue and purpose with tons of good sex with the love of my life please.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 01:04 PM
1

I'd say that doesn't matter as much as ability to get into in a relationship. If you got and given positive attention, you're okay. If you're afraid to express interest and don't get anyone interested in you at all, something is wrong with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 01:03 PM
0

There is no purpose in life more vital than procreation. I wouldn't waste my time on someone who I can't start a real family with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 01:01 PM
0

No. Tall women have much better proportions. But short women are easier, that might explain the preference meme.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 08:07 PM
3

That's only because they are the most beautiful women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 07:20 AM
1

Women aren't as competitive as men. Simple as.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 07:50 PM
1

Which one do you hang out with, the rich and successful, or the walmart employee? Yo, buddy rapper, can I bring my friend? He's never been to a cool party, let's blow his mind a bit. Would you rather date Megan Fox, or a woman that looks like Megan Fox but is not Megan Fox? Megan Fox is not my type. Wouldn't date either.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 04:41 PM
1

Because women who didn’t care enough died out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 04:29 AM
3

What is the red pill gospel book y'all take strawmen from?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/20 01:25 PM
1

So, anyway, here are these extremely successful people that disprove the trend for normies, yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 02:16 PM
1

Women can be turned on by a man they aren't visually excited by, if he's charming, charismatic, artistically skilled, or otherwise sexy. That isn't even remotely true. That's like saying that a man can become turned on by an ugly ass just because he likes how the woman carrying it cooks. No. He might settle for her because of the cooking though. And women are exactly t h e s a m e.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 02:08 PM
1

How was he supposed to know you were becoming mature and ready?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 09:15 AM
16

Wait, women who don't get how dating really is have issues with dating and come to reddit? It all makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 07:05 AM
1

If we knew n counts and the like for sure, the value of traditional women would increase making it impossible for anybody but top men to get them. How it is right now anyway. It's typical of lower class women to be hoes, while those living wholesome lives are in the upper middle class typically, and those are obviously too hard to reach for an average man. So, not much would change, sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 04:49 PM
52

Meanwhile, men will put on a dirty t-shirt, possibly with cum stains from their previous masturbation, and be ready to go. And women are supposed to be the entitled ones ? Stopped reading right there. First, get accurate information about the real world, go out, stop being on the internet so much, then form a proper view, then come back and ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 02:21 PM
3

IMO any relationship that has no goal and too much time in close proximity is doomed. The issues people have after they move in come from staleness. If you're moving in because you want to create a family nest, have children, you will avoid that because you won't have much time to actually spend time together. That doesn't allow you to get bored of each other and gives you the healthy amount of space and a mission.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 02:15 PM
1

What time period are you talking about? If it's "the past" in general, there were basically no such "Chads". There were so few, only in the upper classes where you could afford privacy and leisure without "the village" having an eye on you, that you can say casual sex wasn't a thing. Men that had spare money and were not bound to a community went to brothels, but that's not exactly it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 02:11 PM
1

Men are less picky looks wise. Looking for beauty isn't a male trait, it's a human trait. Getting this conclusion from the limited range of people this sub represents isn't wise. Our ape brain will never stop noticing women because that's helpful for reproduction. But human impulse control is better than fucking everything that arouses. As much as men looking at women won't change, good news are that bonding with one woman is also an ape brain option. And it gets better the longer you are togeth…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 02:01 PM
4

First woman talking is on a show giving a story she missed the entire point of. She's not a catch. She's the one that he thought was to do the chasing, and it didn't click. She's completely oblivious to that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/09/20 11:30 PM
3

It would be more of the same with a bit more degeneracy. Most of the things that govern the "SMP" are traditions and social norms people follow without the need of laws. Most people are normal, and the number of deviants that repulse us is limited.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/20 03:21 PM
2

Why do you men seek women with big eyes? What, you don’t see for yourself? And why do you want women with big titties? You wanna tell me you have no fat storages of your own? Huh? How does being unconditionally attracted to a trait make sense?!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 02:13 PM
3

Just interrupt a natural pair bonding moment for the bill bro lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 01:40 PM
2

This seems to be a case of confirmation bias based on your failings at making friends and seeking new relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 02:20 PM
25

Yes, I don't want someone who doesn't want me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/20 08:28 AM
4

Generation plan B.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/20 04:34 AM
3

Women have a notable in-group bias. That's all you need to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 05:52 PM
1

I'm a peasant.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 05:34 PM
1

Please provide evidence for the lack of god.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 04:29 PM
2

You are all of you. It's not a hypothesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 04:03 PM
3

Yeah, what if? Call me when you have real evidence to believe in such mistakes. So far it's just agenda memes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 03:38 PM
2

I know that. Brains are different because bodies of males and females are different. “Female brain” isn’t a genetic category, the brain becomes “female” in a body of a female. It can’t become such in a body of a male.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 02:10 PM
3

Female brain? You mean human brain developing in a body of a woman? No, it can’t get into a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 01:24 PM
6

“Born in a wrong body” is an impossible concept. You are who you are thanks to every single gene you inherited from your parents. There’s no group of genes that created your brain as it is that can be called “real” you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 08:54 AM
1

I would believe that men are as likely if it was as acceptable to bang a 16 year old for men as it is for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/20 08:51 AM
2

Your instinct isn't jumping at every opportunity of stuffing your face with carbs and sugar. It's making sure you get enough, or craving more than your body needs if your body gets signals of scarcity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/20 07:10 AM
40

Why don't you ignore your evolutionarily ingrained cravings? Huh? Is it that hard? Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 08:14 PM
2

And the difference is supposed to be what?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 01:30 AM
1

Sorry. Men want to fuck women more than women want to fuck men. And women are inherently more valuable because of the 1 man 100 women vs. the 1 woman and 100 men situation. This is the core of the issue and you can't fix it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 01:22 AM
6

Don't take ideas of the female equivalent to incels seriously. Yeah, it's generally better to date people of your age, but their screeching is unwarranted. You know they are wrong because they imagine 18 to early 20's women as completely dumb and innocent, such simplifications pop up only when people create narratives.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/20 01:48 AM
1

Women get boring if you are. If she’s used to you, why try things?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:00 PM
17

Gotcha. It’s not the explosive bad boy they prefer, it’s the manipulator.
/r/BlackPillScience07/06/20 06:14 AM
9

This study says “any” relationship, short term as well.
/r/BlackPillScience07/06/20 06:06 AM
31

They avoid psychopathy in any relationship? That seems to contradict another study that discovered that men possessing the dark triad traits were more attractive given same level appearance as normal men.
/r/BlackPillScience07/06/20 04:51 AM
4

Because reddit is mainstream and the mainstream culture coddles women and disadvantages men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 09:14 AM
9

Women do not want random strangers to approach them to chat them up. Depends. Just an absolutely random guy she's not even payed any attention to? Weird. But, for example, if you're on a bus together and she noticeably gives you a few looks and meets your eyes with a smile, it's perfectly okay to start a light conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/20 04:26 AM
1

My fellow incel people!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 08:32 AM
5

The thought he tried to convey makes Bernie seem even more retarded because he equated a normal family to prison. A common degenerate's fantasy where everybody normal actually secretly suffers and the key to solve this is abolishing order and embracing degeneracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 04:50 AM
2

> low IQ sexism and racism Gimme a couple of examples of high brow racism or sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 11:27 AM
2

If you unironically begin with "the truth", you're not worth anybody's attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 07:48 AM
1

I love this Black woman's milk trucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 03:18 AM
2

We have one, congratulations. Wait, what is this? He has a mental health issues history that goes way back before incels? Seems like you can't really blame incels for radicalizing him, he was nuts anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 02:21 AM
4

He never even mentioned the word "incel". He did the shooting before the term was even created, I think. What, all virgin losers are incels by ideology now?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 01:23 AM
4

Name at least one incel who identified as such or frequented incel forums and committed violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 12:52 AM
1

Being heterosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 08:42 PM
7

What would prevent an incel from raping a robot?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 06:45 PM
-3

Tried reading with a Black accent, doesn’t work well. Stop larping.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 04:40 PM
4

Because he knew better.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:33 PM
2

based female Didn’t even try to understand what you wrote, but I saw these words close to each other and they shouldn’t be.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:24 PM
2

I think you’re failing at understanding what causes the issue you describe.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:21 PM
6

The Bible is right about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:04 PM
0

Creating life is a mistake. The absolute state of western women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:02 PM
4

Basedo shitposting lately
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 11:32 AM
1

Imagine cucking to 1’s and 0’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 11:27 AM
-2

Because of the trash culture that allows porn being legal and doesn’t put pornographers in jail (least they deserve). Because people are conditioned to not enjoy sex to the fullest by porn and feminist propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 11:22 AM
8

Exactly why among all kinds of couples lesbians have the highest rate of physical abuse. Superior at letting the hoe know her place, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 11:08 AM
2

Blacks are less politically correct and inhibited in everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 10:35 AM
4

Who kisses people they don’t like?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 10:34 AM
19

No such thing as a reformed whore. It’s not about muh cocks. It’s about qualities that made her act as a degenerate. I wouldn’t want to breed more people sharing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 10:34 AM
1

Black men — White men — making fun of White women fucking dogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:43 AM
2

This sub got newcomers recently, it seems, and it will be fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 09:07 PM
1

But the percentage of male virgins always drops during economic lows. Men don't need to UHHHH BE STRONG RAAAAAPE. Women give pussy instinctually. They are emotional, when all news are bad news they seek comfort in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 07:19 PM
0

Can't become what you weren't born to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 07:02 PM
1

Incels in denial lmao just behave like that handsome dude, that's the secret haha
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:24 PM
1

These days?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 05:40 PM
2

Men are better actors and writers who create more male characters, pay more for video games and therefore earn representation with their $$$, self esteem isn't possible to measure objectively, being more likely to be hired doesn't mean pro-male bias (it can be the opposite if males are in reality more deserving of what they get).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/20 01:20 PM
2

There are plenty of different studies. Ones looking at alleles and comparing two groups of people having and not having them, twin studies, evaluating nurturing factors etc. However, that's basically not necessary. We are animals. We evolved. We have unique intelligence. That means that this trait also evolved. That means that individuals don't have the same capacity for intelligence, as to evolve something you need variance the natural selection picks from. You can't nurture a horse to be a gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 06:45 PM
9

No offense, but you clearly didn't look into the science behind our study of intelligence, at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 06:06 PM
11

Never got the point of calling mistakes "experience". If a woman isn't married and doesn't have kids by 30, all she did was having relationships that didn't lead to anything. She's not experienced, she wasted her life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 03:02 PM
7

Maybe there shouldnt be hierarchies based upon things people have no control over, just a thought A thought very disconnected from the reality. You are genes expressed in an environment. The core of who you are isn't controlled by you. It's impossible to judge people apart from things they have no control over. Not only that but 'sucessful at reproducing' doesnt mean much these days. It always matters. From the first living organism that learned to reproduce to you and beyond. Everything that di…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 02:47 PM
19

Not to mention how our society has constructed a hierachy of 'beauty' in which some people are given privelage pretty much by genetics alone. If it were for any other trait like intelligence, people would be outraged, but because its for a "subjective" trait like physical attractiveness, we aren't. This is the key to your misunderstanding of what beauty means for people. There is already a hierarchy of intelligence based on genetics alone. People who are lucky to have good "brain genes" naturall…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 01:29 PM
0

What specifically are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 10:25 AM
8

Are you a virgin? Literally just kiss her and caress her body. There, she’s wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 02:18 AM
3

Oh no, 9 to 5? Hard life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 12:53 AM
1

It's just like that era. Have no kids -- die out. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 11:48 PM
2

Yeah, spreading your genes is the ultimate cuckoldry, you got it right, OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 10:26 PM
1

They are unhappy because they were tricked to believe that wageslaving is freedom. Thanks, capitalsm.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 10:14 PM
4

Women say it's about "manipulation". Men are right exposing that as a cheap excuse. It's all about self interest. Lowering the attractiveness of younger women to be more attractive themselves using shaming as a tool. Some would say "hey, you'd not want your daughter to date an older man", and I agree. I would both prefer my daughter to date someone her age and my son to date younger if possible. I would want the best for my kids, and because sexes are different, that best differs too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 02:23 PM
1

It's almost as if the more people watch each other, the better they understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 10:46 AM
1

Yeah, get on my level.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/20 11:48 AM
1

Yeah, because there is no evidence of that, while studies on IQ and height are out there for you to grab.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/20 11:41 AM
1

Literally search "height and IQ", you will get many results confirming the relation.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/20 11:06 AM
2

It's not a racial comparison I made, it is about differences within a population. It doesn't check that more intelligent races are shorter. There is no correlation. Africans (and their descendants in Americas) are shorter than Europeans. Europeans are taller than East Asians. And Wikipedia's article says the following: The study of height and intelligence examines correlations between height and human intelligence. Some epidemiological research on the subject has shown that there is a small but …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/20 10:46 AM
2

If you are tall, you're likely in the genetic elite, tall people tend to be more intelligent. Given how everybody gives you more respect naturally couple with that, no wonder. It's not about putting anyone down. They are simply better. Traits like height, looks, intelligence, emotional stability are all correlated to a degree, all of them help people to succeed, and this makes a lot of less lucky people jealous.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/20 10:32 AM
3

You wrap that as a criticism for men, but this isn't male specific. Everybody falls in love with an idea. You don't know a person fully when you start loving. It's most likely "ha, they are attractive and don't seem to be defective, nice!", that's universal.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 07:37 AM
0

They are paid by their husbands who provide for them while they don’t work.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 05:32 AM
5

This fact of excessive female pickiness is found in the dating world already accounting for influences prior to people making choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 07:51 PM
2

Women here always exaggerate how much work women put into relationships. They say things like “it’s not 1950’s, women shouldn’t clean and cook by themselves while having to be employed at the same time!”, or “it’s too late to be traditional, nobody wants to be a home bound slave”. And yet the thing is that the 50’s are a reality for many women, for the majority of married ones in the first few years of their children, and people have no issues following traditional values. In fact, they seem to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 07:49 PM
1

Not being a thief doesn't get one respect. Not being a hoe doesn't either. Something like becoming a mother is respectful, it's an action that adds something wonderful to the world. Not degrading yourself is basically doing nothing, that's as easy as not stuffing your gut with cupcakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 11:03 PM
1

Your coomer mind can't comprehend that people can be disgusted by promiscuity?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 09:38 PM
1

How is this relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 09:08 PM
1

Half of all people are dumber than the average person, it's not that hard to find out what's the cause here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 07:14 PM
1

Yeah, that's right. And the amount of hoes is also astounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:21 PM
1

That is being a fuckboy. Being a man means putting responsibility over sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:20 PM
0

I think you're projecting your male libido a bit too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:18 PM
1

Oh no, the dating pool excludes hundreds of fuckboys if you have standards! Who'd guess that could happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:15 PM
1

Good women aren't weak and pathetic beings unable to give a sound eloquent no, easily persuaded to become fucktoys just because.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:11 PM
2

Women imagine bad intentions when they aren't attracted to a guy. An ugly lad can be harmless and well intentioned and get called a creep because he's courteous. That's where you get the nice guy meme from.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:09 PM
1

Why would any man waste his time one women past 30?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:06 PM
3

It's not a sacrifice to not be a hoe. It's being a sane human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:02 PM
1

Porn is just another shitty patch on the gaping wound that things like sexual "liberation" and "feminism" inflicted upon the traditional family. Return to tradition where you have respect for men and women, their differences, pornography being taboo, incels being a much tinier minority etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 01:01 PM
2

That doesn't really matter to men or women. If you are trying to evaluate whether someone is high risk or not, you look at the pattern of behavior. Whatever the reason is, if someone doesn't value monogamy, they aren't worth your time, it's as simple as that. Imagine getting a car that breaks all the time. Does it matter that much whether it was damaged to be that way or it was a design flaw? The result is the same, avoid it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 05:04 AM
0

Porn is disgusting. It abuses our sexual senses, it exploits low classes who are usually the "workers", it normalizes degenerate behavior and desensitizes. Pornographers should be put in jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 05:01 AM
1

That also contributed, of course, but the women in poverty still had more kids per person, I don't really buy the "unwanted kids are the fucked up ones" narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 02:50 AM
2

Boomers of 50's to 60's lead to the violent 70's and 80's. Birth rates fell sharply and during the 70's and 80's they dipped below the replacement level. Then you got the decline of crime in the 90's and 2000's from those kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 02:51 PM
3

I am genuinely curious! *insert sarcasm making fun of the people you ask* Really, tell me all about it! I think most men complaining just want compassion and equality. No preferential treatment for females, no beautiful lies, valuing male lives more as they are critically undervalued. Women aren't better than men, women shouldn't be special.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 02:40 PM
3

That doesn't necessarily imply that the cause is single motherhood. Why not bet on genetics? People who are more impulsive are more likely to make mistakes like getting pregnant from someone not willing to commit. Then they pass on impulsive genes, crudely speaking, and the kids are more likely to commit crimes because of their predisposition to being a hot head.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 02:37 PM
4

This is because birth rates are down. Since most violent crimes are done by young men, the less you have them, the less crime. This doesn't cancel the fact that with the significant increase of single mothers in the Black American community murder rates went up a lot since the 50's and 60's.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 02:34 PM
-1

Better tell me why women find incest so appealing when talking about their fucked up fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/20 09:44 AM
2

I have female friends I love and admire, but I can relate to feeling like you can't be loved for who you are alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 06:27 PM
4

You mention studies and then link Joe Rogan's podcast? Okay, okay. I have a hard time buying your narrative. Both because men and women display appreciation for looks differently, and because you may not notice something. You say dudes only care about how good a woman looks in whatever clothes, but there are many subtle ways of adding social status marks to any clothing. Women tend to do show off their wealth mainly in accessories, in their nails, in ways their hair is done, so, even if they wea…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 05:26 PM
0

Just validate the system which wastes the most healthy years for child bearing, that makes a lot of sense long term, my guy! Uh, why do you care that these things go to hell, you want to see humanity progress or something? Yikes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 05:08 PM
2

Aren't people who lose virginity earlier also more likely to have tattoos or convictions? I lost v-card early, but I generally notice, and I believe there's research evidence, that views on sex correlate a lot with impulsivity. It makes sense for people who are more reserved and thinking to judge something they know is not a good mating strategy. Even if they don't follow it. It's not about shame or being angry, I don't think it's emotionally reactionary, this is about who people fundamentally a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 11:16 PM
1

The difference is in connotation and context TRP people give, which is hypergamy and how that's not truly about love, but about not being able to do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 11:12 PM
2

I highly doubt that women are wired to seek stability and financial security. Look at the most impulsive women who are because of that more likely to act on the instinct. They are single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 08:13 AM
6

You immediately insert the patriarchy meme to shill your ideology, and then complain that MRAs do it too. Ironic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 08:11 AM
2

Can you go through some points? I have not read The Rational Male, but I have a few studies on dating saved up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 05:45 PM
3

How is it secure to want a woman that doesn't value forming a strong and lasting connection?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 05:43 PM
3

They misrepresent the case to demonize men. I think most people would agree that it's women who talk about sex more. At least, you hear about sex mainly from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 02:20 AM
7

Actresses are rarely 18-21. To be in a Bond movie, even if you're playing a very unimportant role, you'd need at least some portfolio. And it seems that most Bond movies were made when actors in general were older.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 02:17 AM
4

Not to disagree with the 80/20 rule, I don't really care if it's true even, but you're displaying confirmation bias. It may as well be that men aren't as free to express their sexuality. How are men who say things like "oh damn, I miss getting my dick wet" looked at? Unless they are very attractive, I suppose there's no acceptance as there is for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 02:10 AM
1

How is dying alone and without children a solution?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/20 06:09 AM
2

There are middle aged women and single moms and fat women and high n women looking for a LTR right now. For many men who are tired of loneliness, those women are the true match. Damn, if only men understood they could get rid of standards to be happier. I will go tell them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 07:36 AM
11

There are phone call tapes of Nixon contemplating if racial IQ averages were due to genes. The most interesting thing about this is he said he (as a national leader) would have to keep this a secret if it had turned out to be true
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 07:23 AM
24

Your speech is too reddit for me to buy you're a "Chad". Plus, you're on fucking PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:11 PM
1

I have a high and healthy libido. A libido stronger than of an average woman, that's for sure. I don't have an uncontrolled urge to fuck all the time. There is no need for casual sex. Want to have it all the time to be "satiated"? Marry someone and fuck as much as you want. Whether you're male or female, that's what I expect.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 03:21 PM
1

I don't think this is actually serious. The imaginations of coombrains draw them something exciting and fun, which isn't how it goes in real life. And men aren't the only ones having that fantasy. Women too enjoy dreaming about this type of "rape". It's always about someone attractive and doing exactly what's desired, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 01:05 PM
1

Have this best guy's kid, settle for a beta -- isn't that the default story given by red pillers?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 01:26 AM
1

Don’t leftist feel weird talking about billionaires all the time? I mean, billionaires can order their asses being tortured and killed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/20 11:01 AM
2

Women aren’t gatekeepers of sex. It’s a silly idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/20 10:56 AM
2

You seem to be completely oblivious about what each posted study means for men. Like the following part. Single men (especially from the lower classes) tend to have WORSE outcomes in life than single women. Men suffer from loneliness more than women It's not that men therefore need company more. It's that men are ABANDONED MORE when things go wrong. Women get a far more empathetic treatment. And then you're trying to prove something misunderstanding the RP argument completely. And, by the way, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 10:51 AM
2

That post is an excuse. And it’s lame af. Let’s excuse men leading women on for sex. Men evolved like that. Let’s excuse cheating. Well, novelty being exciting is an evolved thing. Oh, men aren’t gentlemen like they used to be and don’t want to risk their well being for women nowadays? It’s the law of nature, and that’s good.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 10:22 AM
-2

You sure think women are fragile inferior creatures.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 10:10 AM
3

Culture isn’t some magic disconnected concept, it’s directly related to genes. If something cultural is or is almost universal among different groups of people all around the world, it definitely relates to biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 09:30 AM
1

Except they are gorgeous and get bfs without an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/20 03:11 PM
40

Short legs, narrow hips.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/20 11:31 AM
1

The point of sexuality is to make you want have children. The best tactic is actually taking care of your offspring. Making more incels of both gender is not anyone's drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 04:45 PM
1

Nobody is curious enough to make inferior children.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 03:47 PM
2

Men have higher libidos, but I'm not convinced that men who can fuck models go for fat pigs just for the novelty of experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 03:44 PM
1

Well, then you've finally proven my point. With just Chads ugly and average women would die out. The latter may scratch the itch from time to time, but there's no need to use them for that having an abundance of actually attractive candidates.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 03:35 PM
0

Pussies also get wet for all kinds of random reasons, so, everything provoking female arousal is as valuable as wombs then?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 03:30 PM
2

Sure, short ugly women are so worthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 03:26 PM
1

Just lmao at all ugly and average women who think that if there were just Chadz, they’d impregnate their inferior asses. Oh no no no no, if average and below men die out, you die out as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 12:27 PM
1

I don’t get how people go on many dates with different people. Do you go despite being interested or not, for the sake of it? Do you do it for attention? Because in my experience if you like someone, and they seem to like you back, you just become gf and bf, it’s that easy. How do people waste time?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 08:36 AM
1

The correct way of saying it is "report being a bit happier".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 01:57 PM
1

Love for the sake of love dies. Just like the overwhelming majority of first romances which are motivated as much. And getting along requires constant work. Working without a good reason makes people either bored or too tired, they quit. There is nothing sad about your purpose being the most fundamental thing about life. What's more sad is lacking the realization how much procreating matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 12:13 PM
1

You can get all things without staying with one person if there’s no guiding goal. Why watch someone age if all you care about is pleasure?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 10:53 AM
1

If you’re childfree, literally, what’s your purpose? Why be monogamous when you take out the main reason to commit anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 07:32 AM
1

I-it was an accident. I swear... 😰
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 06:51 PM
7

There is a reason “penis envy” exists and not “vagina envy”. I'm a man, and the terf inside of me is about to wake up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 04:35 PM
2

And you know this from?.. Oh, you aren’t even a man, you can’t understand, you can’t relate, you just fancy because there’s always room for insecurity. I genuinely can’t think of any other source for your conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 04:25 AM
5

Not true. The modern mass draft comes from the late 18th century - hardly "modern." I mentioned the rifle to make it clear what I meant by "not long ago". Go see the Thirty Years War in Germany where some areas lost maybe up to 50% of their population. Oh, I know that war was brutal in many ways, sometimes whole villages were slaughtered, women and children included. But the percentage of men hadn't suddenly drop like it did during the industrialized wars. For the reasons including high birth ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 10:44 AM
6

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 07:15 AM
31

Massive drafts are, historically speaking, a modern invention, since a single barely trained soldier became somewhat useful only when rifles became common. Before that most peasants could just peasant their live away. Before industrialization wars were rarely very deadly. Armies that could be sustained weren't big enough, casualties did not cause the healthy male population to decrease noticeably like as the result of WW1. It wasn't like you imagine it. The imbalance was dealt with by the commun…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 06:35 AM
6

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/20 01:11 PM
5

This comment wasn’t made by a Japanese woman. It was made by someone with yellow fever and not realizing that Japanese women are maybe even worse. In any case, they have even less children, talking about essential roles.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 11:58 AM
1

I am not pro life and that's not hypocritical. I don't want people who are immoral enough to do an abortion spread their genes.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 02:32 PM
3

Hehehe, is that all you got? Pathetic, I am going to use 10% of my power.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/20 05:00 PM
6

He shouldn’t have sex that can lead to conception then.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 04:58 PM
3

But nobody cares; we’re not here to see someone skilled, we’re here to see someone pretty and pretend they’re skilled. Is this a revelation to you? Woah, actors aren't experienced MMA fighters. There is no need to be one. If you're in shape and aren't short, sane men, regardless of their physique, would think twice before attacking. At some point, unless you're a top tier professional, there's too much gamble. Actors could become professionals. There is (or was, some can be too old to fulfill th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 12:12 AM
4

simply don't work out Maybe because there's no drive. People get together "just because" and out of "love" with common goals as an afterthought. not every relationship is going to lead to marriage Which is just as much of a waste of time as riding lots of cocks. A bit better, but... Never get together with anyone who doesn't know what they want in life and have priorities first, feelings second.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 11:55 PM
14

Revenge for preferential treatment for thousands of years.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 02:04 PM
1

Most people don't care. If you mean specific online groups of people talking about this all the time... It doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 01:02 PM
1

We already know the answer, look at what attractive guys do. Whatever they want. And they're not shy about it. Want hoes? Get hoes. Want a virgin wife? Get a virgin wife. You are validated by having plenty of choice, opinions of women are far less important.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 12:58 PM
6

You mean when he was barely pubescent and liked primarily by girls of his age?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 12:33 PM
1

I just googled top male k-pop idols. You’re way too wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 12:10 PM
24

Rating is arbitrary anyway Where are all the women who prefer short, narrow shouldered, and weak jawed men with girly voices?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 11:33 AM
6

Then she said her intention wasn't to hire a woman, but the best candidate. She just wanted women to be respected among the sent resumes. ... What is the fucking point in resumes you don't accept? She's such a liar.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 03:18 PM
1

I think this advice or answer is given intuitively. When a person thinks of someone they won't date, they imagine someone ugly, with bad hygiene, lacking basic life skills. Someone repulsive comes to mind. Women think, from their privileged position, that if a man has issues dating, he is that repulsive guy, and it's his fault he can't score.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 11:24 AM
111

Not thinking that pussies are special is woman hating now.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/20 07:01 AM
1

This is such old news. Here's an update. Tokenism didn't bring any positive changes.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:41 AM
0

Because women don't have better insults. Women are lame, deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 06:23 AM
-1

Women will NEVER be able to relate to men’s sexual starvation because they just aren’t built to ever be sexually starved. Bullshit because a man can easily hire a hooker. And a woman can have principles and not be a whore, waiting for the right man, and being starved for dick. Men will NEVER relate to women’s objectification because the male body just isn’t a commodity. If you're ugly that is. Women will NEVER relate to men’s constant pressure to be strong because they’re expected to be weak. So…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 03:12 PM
3

A promiscuous woman isn't a good investment if you want to become a father, simple as that. And in general, if you want to be in a monogamous relationship, any sign that it will likely be risky is a big red flag. Women can think very similarly. For example, I know one who says she wouldn't date a very attractive guy because it's easy for them to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 05:09 AM
5

It's a normal biological phenomenon. When regular men were given pictures of pubescent girls under the legal age for rating, but told that the age was legal, the numbers were high (source). One shouldn't feel guilty, just not act on the desire because even though the body is ready, the mind is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 05:04 AM
3

Freud was a pseud and fraud, he was wrong about almost everything and his only contribution that survived the test of time and real science is the new approach of looking at human psyche. And people still talk about his "theories" like they meant something real.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 04:56 AM
1

they prioritize their own sexual interest were talking about attraction, not sexual performance Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 05:35 PM
16

Maybe that’s because schools focus on “female” ways of educating. I mean that the typical approach is social. Words and phrases people first learn are all about socializing. It’s boring. I know many men who became interested in English as boys because of video games. Boys like tools, things, and these are rarely present at language studies.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 09:11 AM
26

Being healthy sounds unrealistic! America.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 08:49 AM
1

You are missing a healthy libido.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 07:56 AM
1

Most people, women as well, don’t ask themselves many questions and just exist. That’s why most relationships are doomed. Poor impulse control, conscious thought isn’t used by everybody.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 07:55 AM
1

I have no qualms with men pumping and dumping women as probably a majority of them deserve it anyway You’re a virgin. Go out, you’ve got no place here until you experience what you’re talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 07:52 AM
1

Woah, you feel unwanted and it seems like opportunities to find the love of your life are non-existent? It sure sucks to be in the shoes of an average guy. Can you quickly list all things you can provide in a relationship, OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 09:23 PM
0

No, have reading comprehension, that isn’t even implied. Sleeping around makes one a whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 05:28 PM
0

What documentations are you talking about? Do you have any sources proving your point? I didn’t even use a points system, mind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 03:59 PM
0

The idea that a 3 is someone’s 7 is laughable. You’re using subjective preferences as a cop out.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 03:54 PM
2

I barely care, sure. So?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:38 PM
1

I get what I want. Just giving a friendly advice to low tier women. Because they have inflated opinions of themselves. Not my opinion even, men never seriously campaign to destroy beauty standards and proclaim obese monsters gorgeous.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:33 PM
5

There is no such thing as an attractive man who chases because the woman simply responds to advances and the chase ends before beginning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:29 PM
2

These men just want women to be realistic. I am all for women choosing who they want to be with. It's good. But then plenty of women prefer to be used and abused just because their vagina signals "he's attractive". And let's be honest. Just like men, women can be genetic trash. Losers of the lottery, however you call them, below average women shouldn't be entitled to quality men. Just like below average men shouldn't go for attractive women, of course. These men want women to be in their league,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:12 PM
15

You must be joking, my guy. All of these games make no sense and aren't real. Women are straightforward. They don't "want men who don't want them". They want attractive men who are likely to be out of their league. Who don't thirst because they've always had it easy with women. Your red pill brain farting is just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:05 PM
0

Literally who complains about an already hoe being more of a hoe?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:01 PM
3

men are inherently wired to take care of and protect women No? Taking care and protecting a woman only makes sense if she gives something in return. Maybe it's great sex. Maybe she's having your kids and is a good wife. Maybe her daddy is a big businessman who can help you getting a good job. Just doing it for no reason at all? Are you joking?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 12:58 PM
0

risking disease pregnancy and pain (very possible without arousal) As if that stops women from being used by attractive guys, lmao. Just admit that you're a whore and move on. It's okay, but nobody needs your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 12:56 PM
8

Special, but not special. Makes sense. Guess how I know you're a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 12:50 PM
6

Your male peers would get rejected anyway. So, insecurities are proper ones. Jerks don't get more success with women. It's just that attractive and pushy people are common as they don't get much resistance and get used to being that way since childhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 12:48 PM
1

I care about plights of women. I mean REAL plights, especially those men don’t experience much. Like... Uh... Hmm, actually, women have it way too good already.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 11:45 AM
2

Women are like men, but with lower libidos and more fear. That's literally it. Oh, she needs specific conditions to be aroused? No shit, her sexual drive is so weak that there are conditions to be met to even let it express itself. No wonder men have been takers for most of the history. Women are too passive even when it comes to "Chad", people who aren't strongly driven by their desires are lame.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 09:25 PM
2

Don’t be an irresponsible fat retard and date another Asian, what’s so impossible about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 05:31 AM
1

To see what losers among women talk about when they're honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 11:28 PM
3

Both men and women who are losers argue like that, and you have a keen eye for men's of that kind faults. Go to FDS and you will see women who want extremely high value males but don't talk at all about what they can in turn provide to these males. The whole thing is "I want a great partner, even if for a day, but I am a lazy piece of shit", and it's unisex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 09:35 PM
3

You are overestimating how deeply RP adepts look into things. And it's not a jab, there is little reason. RP is a hypothesis built from a politically incorrect everyday view of things. Then studies are used to support claims derived from experience. Which is very biased, but can still be true. I can already see how this study can be used in favor of RP. What, you say females also compete for mates at times? Well, of course, it is Chad they drool after! It's the hierarchy we've been talking about…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 01:24 AM
1

It's bullshit because the focus isn't on the real issues. There's way too much evidence that sex and happiness are correlated. To the point where it must be extremely rare to find a very happy person who doesn't have sex. When someone doesn't have sex while desiring it, their life is usually full of issues both fixable and not. Maybe there's an issue with making friends. Maybe someone is a shut in. Maybe someone can't bring themselves to work. Maybe they are unattractive. Maybe they have mental …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 01:13 PM
1

Foo Bar lol ok idc men are text
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 09:00 PM
2

If you need a smartphone, but you have old Nokias in abundance, that abundance doesn't mean anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 08:43 PM
-1

Getting hoes is yuck, buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 08:32 PM
0

As a man I can tell you that's an illusion. Out of all men who are "lined up" only a minority are actually serious in their intentions and are realistically worth a try, and that's not taking into consideration chemistry. Quality men are rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 08:28 PM
13

Because people get more intelligent and make their social circles wider.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:04 PM
18

I mean, look at you. What can you actually give to a woman? You're not good looking. You don't earn much (you'd say you do otherwise). You're bitter. You've not achieved things that stand out. Just try thinking like a woman for a second, why would you choose to date yourself exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 03:29 PM
-1

You’re just a low libido person who can’t relate to strong sexual desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 01:00 PM
6

Selection bias.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 12:25 PM
1

The greasy basement fleshlight fuckers really aren’t paying camgirls a dime because they can masturbate better, sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 12:14 PM
-6

That's only true if you're not attractive.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 02:13 PM
1

I think it's okay if a woman is entitled like ones on FDS, but only when they're okay with men being entitled as well. Their whole call for men being basically chivalrous can only work if they play their according role, but they don't want to. Which is why I think it's pathetic. Yeah, you want a high value male? But you're a nobody and you can provide nothing of substantial value, darling. There was a post recently where some commenters called an actual British prince a low value male because he…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:16 PM
1

Incels aren’t fucking.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 02:39 PM
1

Wait, you shut a brother down when he expresses his love for the female physique? Apologize.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 05:37 AM
1

Women have lower libidos and get disgusted more easily. So, when men express sexuality, it's more likely that women find that weird or repulsive than when women are evaluated by men. Women then talk about that, the state of things is formed.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 02:00 AM
0

Hello, woman. Yes, women can't joke, lol
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/19 09:08 PM
13

No, they are rarely just jokes, what's your point? Can you be less of a bitch and just say all you have on your mind?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/19 06:46 PM
13

Jokes rarely exist in a vacuum.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/19 06:39 PM
–

Imagine feeling threatened by a doll.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/19 04:12 PM
0

Why, who?
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:00 PM
0

Because it’s so hard to overpower a woman to take what she carries.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 11:46 AM
1

Why yes, a woman isn’t marriage material after 23.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 12:08 PM
-12

Stop whining and at least prove the men think they’re victims. Men and women are different. You should have a right to say what’s a difficult situation and what’s not yourself. Better fight for voices of men who do feel bad after such a dare than assume that everything is victimhood like an unhinged feminist.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 11:40 AM
0

Not ignoring it, but without finding a definite link it's just pointless to repeat same factoids. People thought that education made people very intelligent and poor people were disadvantaged socioeconomically because of lack of quality public schools. Then voucher systems showed that putting a poor child into a great school only slightly improves their grades, hinting at a deeper cause.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 10:45 PM
-5

Isn't that because people who can't grasp commitment are also of low intelligence? What if it's bad genes, not lack of fathers? I've never seen evidence directly linking single motherhood and future life outcomes, it is just a correlation.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 08:33 PM
4

A tag game implies she'd chase you in return. As if.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/19 10:03 AM
-1

Cavemen weren't randomly beating up each other, I don't think it was much different that what we have now. Some did, some did and succeeded at getting more power, but humans are social creatures, and we lived in tribes with hierarchies and rules.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 09:21 PM
-2

People will always bully uglyness or weakness because it's repulsive. Nobody cares that it's out of his control, he's not even trying though.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 09:19 PM
-5

The problem isn't him being male. It's that he's an effeminate male. Can you imagine a jock being called out for wearing a jacket of any color? Judging by the profile pic alone he's most likely not tall, his shoulders are narrow. I don't know how that's "men's rights", people will always bully easy targets who are perceived to not be a threat under any circumstances. Same goes for women -- they get bullied (mostly by other women, of course) if they are low status (or perceived as such) as well. …
/r/MensRights09/12/19 07:06 PM
4

Shame them, waste their time for your own amusement, share their embarrasing life choices to expose the stupidity.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/12/19 01:51 AM
7

Women need to step up in providing housing for their partners.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 01:20 PM
1

“What, I am supposed to compete with someone looking great?” Grow up.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 12:28 PM
0

It’s actually cringe though.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 12:50 PM
-5

I wouldn't go for knocking out a man that would be so weak a slap would do the calming. Same reason I wouldn't punch a child -- they are fucking weak. Women are the weak sex, deal with your physical superiority as it is appropriate.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:11 PM
-3

Appealing to common sense is not an argument.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:10 PM
-8

Stop this whataboutism autism. The court exists to solve this. Was it justified? Was it self defense, or was it too much? What was the context? And so on. Better focus on fixing how women get lamer sentences for the same thing and then relax and chill.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:06 PM
1

Holy shit, I am so tired of this retarded fixation on "b-but she hit first, I can hit too, fuck sexism!" Yes, dumb faggot, yes, you can hit back, but fucking know that women are more fragile and you can be retard tier strong compared to them, don't send them to coma because bitches have bitchy tempers. Do you even read your own comments? You are exactly like feminists, you took that "uh uh we are fighting muh double standards" and then forget about the reality of things because your pussy femini…
/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:03 PM
-21

I am not condoning violence for no reason against males or females. I simply think you should judge by the damage done. If a woman punches you and you get a slight bruise but then you hit her in the jaw and break it, that's not justified.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 07:48 PM
-32

Nobody is calling it fair because of sexism. Damage done is important. Especially in the court. We have standards for what constitutes appropriate self defense for that reason.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 07:43 PM
-47

This is a fair double standard. A male punch can do much more damage -- if you're not in danger, generally try to avoid violence, but if it comes to it, just slap or push. And don't forget to report aggressors and gather all the evidence you can.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 07:34 PM
–

Me. I am tired of “strong” women who pretend to be men on screen. I want to see strong femininity.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 07:34 PM
2

Lmao just inbreed.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 06:17 PM
6

Stop arguing and keep the lid closed.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/19 03:57 PM
5

"As good." Who the hell watches female soccer? At all.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 10:24 AM
53

To be honest, I'd not blame women or feminists first for this. Big tech wants to pay workers less. How do they want to do that? Bring in more workforce. Import, get more women educated, they go for whatever that works.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 07:08 PM
156

There's an easier way to deny her the pass. One sentence: Why is lesbian domestic abuse rate is the highest among couples of all types?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/19 12:15 PM
9

Every female led movement is destined to have pro-woman bias (even at expense of men) because women as a whole have a high in-group bias.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/19 10:41 AM
94

I wasn't aware that jobs were given somehow. I thought that they were created and then filled in accordance with labor market. Women were never interested in pursuing those jobs. And wise men banned women, which aren't suited for combat roles anyway, from serving.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 10:23 AM
1

It has.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 03:35 PM
1

What's the point of being "bigger than them" when they shut you down all the time? Nobody cares if you are a fucking knight, they only care if you push back and hurt them.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 08:15 PM
1

DADDY ISSUES
/r/MensRights27/10/19 03:27 PM
2

And then look at putting people into "cages" like prisons and schools. There are hierarchies that are built on all sorts of competitions (including bullying, fights etc.). We may be more docile, but the behavioral principles are very similar.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 08:42 PM
1

The Bell Curve has data on male/female IQ scores. Basically, women are slightly more intelligent on average, and males and both more likely to be the lowest of the low and the highest of the high (geniuses). You may be correct that there's just correlation to a degree, but there's a pretty much causal relationship between hormones and how one gets into aggressive state.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 08:39 PM
1

They are very much capable of abuse and violence, but that doesn't go against my argument of males being more destructive. I'd even say that women are more likely to be causes of abusive relationships (just comparing rates of lesbians, which are off the charts, compared to gays). However, male kill much more often, rape more often, steal much more often etc.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 08:21 PM
-4

Are all those corpses males leave behind in numbers women can't get anywhere near just something that your stigma fallacy can explain away too?
/r/MensRights25/10/19 08:11 PM
-5

If you look at crime victimization surveys, where victims are asked who perpetrated crimes, men are vastly overrepresented compared to women. Don't try to make it seem like the sexist courts are all the is.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 08:06 PM
-4

The argument is that people with low IQ, high testosterone, and low impulse control are more likely to commit crime, not matter which group they belong to. Black people seem to have more people like that than White people, so, you are somewhat correct, although I wouldn't frame that as a race issue, rather a gene pool issue. It's fixable and isn't about "Blackness".
/r/MensRights25/10/19 08:04 PM
-65

Crime stats all around the world. Higher testosterone, more individuals with low IQ.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 08:00 PM
-84

Men are inherently more violent.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 07:57 PM
-87

She's not wrong.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 07:39 PM
-8

Female incel? No.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 09:24 PM
-31

Sexism is bad, but teaching kids what to do in extreme situations isn’t traumatizing. Generations have been through bombing drills etc., yet nothing bad came out of it.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 05:18 AM
5

Imagine cutting a part of your penis off for THIS.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 08:54 PM
4

I think the real reason here is that women have lower libidos, and since they have more control over sex now, they have less sex overall as a result.
/r/BlackPillScience14/10/19 07:21 PM
4

Won’t happen. Male sex drives are working against us.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 04:49 AM
1

This is funny. Women who aren’t good enough for attractive men that want marriages and commitment are so oblivious. Not only are they promiscuous, they don’t understand that they are not intelligent enough, not beautiful enough, not good enough overall. Basically, they should be treated with the attitude reddit judges incels.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:50 AM
3

Hoes mad, hoes mad, hoes mad.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 01:05 PM
2

Oh no, some people take it seriously, let's agree with them and accept viewpoints of others like we have none!
/r/MensRights30/09/19 08:49 PM
191

Of fucking course. Of course. And, as usual, this won't take the front page, unlike the false accusation that painted White boys as bad.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 08:44 PM
7

YIKERINOS MALES JOKE ON A CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC SHUT IT DOWN
/r/MensRights30/09/19 08:10 PM
-6

I'd agree, but on the other hand India has a lot of rape. A lot. And most of it definitely unreported. I wouldn't say that women get preferential treatment there.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 07:47 PM
7

That's because everybody cares about women first. Both men and women give preferential treatment to women.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 07:44 PM
9

There are people in the comments who say that feminism is to blame. Well... Selfish femininity isn't confined to feminism. Source: Abstract Four experiments confirmed that women's automatic in-group bias is remarkably stronger than men's and investigated explanations for this sex difference, derived from potential sources of implicit attitudes (L. A. Rudman, 2004). In Experiment 1, only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem (A. G. Greenwald et al…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:19 PM
13

He’s the father of their grandkids. He’s also their family, their future.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/07/19 08:53 AM
7

or
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/19 11:11 AM
7

So, follow your username.
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/19 11:09 AM
13

Have you went trans yet?
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/19 10:36 AM
0

Not really, women just settle for someone they'd not marry otherwise who then supports them financially.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 01:06 PM
5

It's okay to man up. It's okay to hold yourself to high moral and behavioral standards.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 03:22 PM
1

Tbh women love jealousy and when men own them. So... Not that surprising she’s having that reaction to an attractive guy.
/r/Chadfish20/06/19 10:30 AM
12

Does there need to be an article? The answer is simple: to deter false accusations.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 07:35 AM
0

Where is the direct contradiction? Chasing pleasure because you've been conditioned to value it over anything else is degenerate and destructive behavior.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 07:34 PM
0

Which doesn’t contradict mine. Eh, so?
/r/MensRights09/06/19 10:05 AM
0

People chase pleasure. What else is there to understand?
/r/MensRights09/06/19 08:46 AM
-8

Yes, people who do threesomes and join bdsm clubs are degenerate.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 03:15 AM
-18

I mean, a degenerate pays for his stupidity, in this instance child support is a good thing.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 02:55 AM
1

the dystopian future depicted in her hyper-relevant novel, The Handmaid's Tale. Huh? The future looked much better than what we have now.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 09:00 AM
-4

Considering all things, what if the rape accusation is a real one, but the court determines that the evidence was lacking and brushes the case off?
/r/MensRights24/05/19 02:58 PM
3

She's a woman.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:09 PM
1

Having a society in which children growing up without fathers is normal is the main one with the most quantifiable results.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:45 PM
1

Outcomes.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:26 PM
1

It is worse because thinking that it’s no biggie is accepted as a norm.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:39 PM
1

This isn't an indication of the system's fault. Boys are more likely to cause trouble, more likely to not give a fuck about grades, but also more likely to succeed. Comparing boys and girls 1 to 1 is ignoring that they are all different. Show actual issues with the system, don't focus on disparities.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 02:38 PM
1

Makes total sense. Among the most intelligent and the most dumb people men outnumber women.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 09:15 AM
2

Oh yeah. Rising single motherhood is fine, you go queen! La la la, not my business, I don’t care about kids who don’t have fathers, la la la, freedom.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 05:33 PM
3

Step 1. Not give a shit. Step 2. See your society degenerate. It’s that simple.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 05:13 PM
5

Why not shame both?
/r/MensRights06/05/19 03:52 PM
4

No, what do you mean?
/r/MensRights03/05/19 06:29 AM
7

And what's wrong with that?
/r/MensRights02/05/19 11:34 PM
-3

Both look healthy for their ages.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:28 PM
3

Oke, time to go to bed.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 05:22 AM
1

Yes, suck it up and stop fucking after you’re told not to. Doing otherwise is wrong.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 05:16 AM
3

hurr I'm a hole provide durr
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:31 AM
14

Because to live a truly fulfilling life you better have a family. And a good woman can be a great help with that. Let’s not mirror the feminist “I don’t need a man”.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:40 AM
21

He’s a Jew, so it’s totally okay to hurt his son’s penis!
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:07 AM
2

Here's something you should know. You don't owe him anything, and you can leave without any guilt. You are a free human being, and you choosing to stick with him to help is an admirable thing. You seem to be a good person, good luck.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 05:55 PM
1

Maybe that's just beauty privilege in play, and nothing to do with sexism. Suppose we'd have a smoking hot handsome guy contributing to a cause like the black hole's picture, and he'd be on one of the group pics of scientists working on the project. Well, women would likely make memes like "hehe, everybody praising these guys for the pic, but we know what's really important, teehee". Pretty people attract attention, you know. It's just that males are less likely to be stunning, so there are more…
/r/MensRights14/04/19 06:50 PM
7

You don’t need a source for this. It’s a description of events, not a research. You may disagree with it, but it’s not just made up.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 06:48 PM
11

What a pussy, lol
/r/MensRights02/04/19 04:56 PM
12

Name me a single democratic society that hasn't gone the road of infaling public spending and more tolerance of all kinds after giving women the voting rights, then we'll talk.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 04:48 PM
17

Shitposts? It's pretty accurate.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 04:37 PM
1

Here is an article referencing one of the studies. It has a graph where you can clearly see that Black females get sentenced for slightly less time compared to White females (all in comparison to White males showing gender disparities).
/r/MensRights01/04/19 09:55 PM
2

Black males also behave the worst. If you account for things like recidivism or income, their sentencing is only 10% longer than that of White men. It doesn’t account for court behavior or jury sympathy, so it can be it, but Black women get a little shorter sentences than White women, so you can’t say there’s racial prejudice at play.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 10:32 AM
3

Eastern Europe and Russia tend to have under the replacement rate birthrates too.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 08:09 PM
3

She couldn't even have "asked for it".
/r/MensRights30/03/19 08:07 PM
4

And this was an understandable thing. If my friend got raped by gypsies, I'd fucking hate them, at least for a while. It's just a natural part of human beings to be tribal about such things. No need to be ashamed if you didn't act on bad thoughts and overcame them.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 06:01 PM
2

I mean, it's not HCLGBITSAIDFIFJSAOKDSAFKAP+, what's the issue here?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:02 PM
2

You have a very severe misunderstanding what's the difference between past interbreeding and current multiculturalism. In the past different ethnic groups mixed up for 2 main reasons. 1 is they got along together and were similar enough, so that was something natural to them. 2 is conquest. What we've been talking right now is completely different, and not only because such large scale immigration that can turn a country "multicultural" is unprecedented in Irish history in that way, but also bec…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:13 PM
2

In your opinion. And “multicultural” doesn’t and can’t mean “Irish”. It means you have people of other cultures, while the Irish are such by both culture and blood. You can’t become Irish, and if that is racist, that’s fine, not all racism is bad then.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 12:51 PM
4

How is it racist? She's just not Irish and shouldn't dictate what Irish culture should be in the manner she did, that's rude and should have been enough to get kicked out in good old days where such behavior was not tolerated.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:55 PM
7

Somebody needs to tell her she can’t talk like that in a country that’s not hers.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:36 PM
11

Another encouragement for men to be more feminine. Definitely will help.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 08:57 PM
-3

Yeah, she is right. Women are prettier and smell better. If I had a choice, I would choose to be attracted to women.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 04:44 PM
31

Imagine not being able to compete with toys, lol
/r/MensRights21/02/19 06:19 PM
1

What has she done? Listened to him and left. That’s it. You blame her for leaving. Leaving a person is so horrible, she’s just a monster! Especially considering that some people need time alone after sobbing. But yeah, MONSTER!
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:07 AM
1

But ignoring your nature is stupid. You should not strive for ideals that ignore it. That's why we can't have communism. Humans are not perfect, we are not suited for such a system to exist in real life. You can't expect people to force themselves to like someone. This is not an example of a married couple lacking effort to work together as a loving whole unit. This is someone at 5 months of dating. Finding out something that changed their view of the partner. It's fine to back off if that's a d…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 04:10 PM
0

Nobody can fully control themselves, grow up from your retarded maximalism of unrealistic expectations, all humans are flawed from the perfectionist moralism standpoint.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:59 PM
2

She has been supportive by listening to her boyfriend. She just isn't attracted to him anymore. That's literally what this is about. Lack of attraction. That you cannot control, so do not shame. And there is no need to eliminate gender stereotypes. They will always exist as men and women are different.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:58 PM
1

Both are fine.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:56 PM
1

She doesn't think less. She's not attracted anymore. Two different things.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:56 PM
1

so never should have had those campaigns for equal representations of women in STEM and uppermanagement Yes. Those guys were entitled to their opinions and you're for freedom of thought right? Also yes.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:55 PM
1

Yeah, men have issues! Therefore let's tell women that they should exercise an impossible amount of self control to adhere to our moral worldview! If she does not make this impossible effort, she is a monster because men can be victims too! Equality, yay!
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:54 PM
1

Oh wow, I am a sycophant because I am for freedom of thought and feeling. What a stretch, get out of the echochamber for a bit, please. You are not helping men by your automated responses lacking nuance.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:48 PM
0

Open your eyes, you are repeating your agenda that has nothing to do with the situation in the post pic. You are an agenda zombie, friend.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:46 PM
0

Again, the natural way was also women in the kitchen You can't prove that, that's just your outlook. Women in the kitchen is a societal norm that is appropriate to certain conditions of this society. It changed. So, if it is changeable by changing societal standards, it is not natural. Men were entitled to think less of women right? That they don't belong in STEM or upper management. Who are we to change how they feel? Do you see the ignorance here? YES. Feel and think however you want. You want…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:42 PM
1

people like you like to pretend men got together a thousand years ago to oppress women. Where did I say anything like that? Stop using your typical echo chambery attacks that should be directed against feminists on me and actually read and think for yourself, please. A woman disliking a man for whatever reason is not unjust, chill.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:36 PM
0

Listen, I don't need this narrative repeated. And the narrative itself proves you wrong, because women are sold a picture of a man too. You know, women are told to like men that are about feminist issues, that are "woke". Women still prefer non-soyboys who bow to feminist opinions. Women still prefer men who are masculine. THIS IS THE NATURAL WAY WE FEEL. If we individually feel something differently based on presented information, it's not necessarily conscious and ethically wrong. You are enti…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:34 PM
0

And in the public discourse these men are labeled as monsters. Where? You've seen something on reddit? You've read something on a feminist blog? Really, how do you get that idea? It's pretty much accepted that you can leave a partner for whatever reason. If you don't want to deal with the baggage of a rape victim, it's your right and your choice, and nobody should be able to force you or shame you for that choice. That's my view, I don't care about the public discourse at all. The woman here has…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:30 PM
-2

Now you shift your comparison from movements to what an individual feels about fat women. Don't make this logical mistake, please. And feminism has nothing to do with this case, at all. Just stop thinking in the "muh men are oppressed" box for a second, this is not about issues of men, this is about an individual woman feeling something. Think about this for a second. You are mad because a woman felt something you don't want women to feel. This is... Very controlling.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:22 PM
1

Her basically falling out of love with him is tied to the self image she prescribed to him What makes you think that is conscious or made up? We all prescribe images to people. So? We constantly adjust how we see people based on these prescribed images. Say you have a friend, and then you learn that friend killed an animal for fun. Oh, that prescribed image you had changed! Weird how it works, right? It's almost as if... You know, that image is created not intentionally. whilst at the same time …
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:19 PM
-8

Fat acceptance or female gender roles are not comparable to something an individual feels with no control over the feeling.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:10 PM
-3

White knighting is protecting something that doesn't deserve it. Here this woman has every right to feel the way she feels, that's why I call the commenter who called her a monster a white knight. She did not make a CONSCIOUS decision to view him as different than before, as less appealing in the end of his story. It was UNCONSCIOUS. Does she lack empathy? No, I don't think so. You, however, equate her losing interest in her bf as a romantic partner to lacking empathy. Women do not like men (and…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 01:33 PM
-8

What makes you think that these stereotyped expectations are not rooted in her biology? Most women want to be around strong men, is that a stereotyped expectation, or is that an evolutionary ingrained need? Not to say that this woman's bf was not strong, that's irrelevant here. What's relevant is that she viewed him as not strong automatically, not even thinking, as evident by her trying to process how it happened. Is she at fault when it's something like feeling that she has no control of?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 01:28 PM
-21

To be honest, I don't think she deserves to be labeled as such a monster. Yeah, she did a bad thing, but she didn't do it because of intended evil motive or exceptional self centeredness. Sometimes you can't control things that can make you dislike or lose interest in some people. It's not rational. There are men who change how they feel about women when they learn they have been raped. You can't do anything about it, such trauma causes unpredictable reactions. Telling people they should feel a …
/r/MensRights16/02/19 12:44 PM
0

That’s the point. Weak men should step aside and let strong men with better genes pick all the best women. That’s just how evolution works, suck it up or btfo, crybaby libtard.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 10:05 PM
-1

Well, that’s one of their defining features. Men afraid of women so much they choose to go their own way.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:12 AM
4

Women are better on average, men are among the best. That’s true for almost anything and reflects the IQ distribution.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 04:38 PM
-2

For her? Sure. Anybody should have preferences.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 05:24 PM
-30

I mean, let's not be dishonest. Men who had time to develop and gain wealth who aren't old or even middle aged, and young fertile women. It's the best pairing you can have.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:26 PM
6

You're right. And more attractive too, at times we reward beauty for beauty's sake.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:43 PM
14

It was over 2 times that of Whites in the 70’s though. Source.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:28 AM
5

Huh, maybe Hitler wad right in his thinking if modern academia approves this.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:23 AM
1

It's pretty much the way divorces are done, it's the marriage laws that do that. Even if she signed away the money, that signing away isn't recognized by the state.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:25 PM
1

How so? The question is answered, I don't know the specific law that was used here, but it doesn't matter. A prenup can't ignore the law, if it does, this happens.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:23 PM
1

Are you kidding me? That's how law works, contracts cannot contradict the law. You can't sign up to slave labor even if you want to because of that PRINCIPLE. For the same reason you can't just make a written agreement with someone to kill them and face no consequences. The law doesn't care, there is a clear hierarchy of law, which is state legislature of high order (something like the constitution, if something is contradicting it, even if it's signed a special court will repeal it), then state…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:03 PM
0

Are you fucking retarded? I am just saying that prenups don't work most of the time because of the law principle, I am not defending anything.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:17 PM
0

This is the principle of the law. Written agreements cannot contradict the law. If a prenup contradicts the alimony laws, for example, it will simply be considered null. That's my whole point.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:16 PM
-7

ALL LAW.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:34 PM
-3

No matter how fucked up the law is, if her signature is under something that contradicts the law, it’s non-binding by any means.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 01:42 PM
-18

Written agreements can't contradict the law? Woah, what else is new?
/r/MensRights21/12/18 09:53 AM
7

Ah, I just love this phrase. "Study shows". It holds such an authority on stupid people who almost always don't bother to read into studies themselves. Follow up any argument by "Study shows!", and even if you don't actually understand what's the raw data and can't separate it from the author's bias or flawed interpretation, you certainly have someone smart behind your back agreeing with you. After all, who is the person you're arguing with? The person who wrote the study? Of course not, and the…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 02:54 AM
-2

Care to refute anything said?
/r/MensRights19/11/18 06:28 PM
-9

A terrorist, a guy who plagiarized his PhD and used a ghost righter for his speeches, a racist and a pedophile, a guy who caused a Civil War by starting a blockade, a guy who until his last few years of life was a Black supremacist, a womanizer who wasn't even a good politician, one genuinely good person, my fuhrer.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:10 PM
3

In their own fucking country.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 12:52 PM
4

I think it actually makes sense. If you're disgusted by her real self, you're not really attracted to her. And it's not hygiene because it's not a requirement to shave armpits to be clean, healthy, and smell good.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:01 PM
13

Here’s my take on it. If someone can’t stand natural healthy you, they are not attracted to you. For example, if I were a woman and chose not to shave anywhere, and my partner would be grossed out by this, I’d say bye. That means we wouldn’t mate as cavemen, there’s no good old natural attraction and what good is a relationship where the real you grosses out your partner?
/r/MensRights08/11/18 10:37 AM
215

Isn't that a joke?
/r/MensRights06/11/18 04:43 PM
4

Imagine being so self absorbed.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 02:09 AM
68

I don’t know if she’s a mother, but that’s Laura Loomer. It’s no wonder she says that, she’s a provocateur.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 10:59 AM
10

Any kind of sexual objectification of adults should be okay.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:20 PM
13

I love how Peterson actually says nothing, yet he attracts so much attention from both feminists and those who think that modern feminism is a problem.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:22 PM
3

I think good family values of the past can do that. A big supportive family can not only provide the most needed community of a person's life, but solve many problems of people regardless of gender. Men didn't kill themselves as much 100 or 200 years ago for a good reason, even if the life was harsher. But I guess that's not possible under current political system that cares only about creating good workers who never have any business at home, can stay late at the office and say nothing against …
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:19 PM
1

We use anecdotes now? Is this a woman hate subreddit?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 10:19 AM
12

But you're also in control of your behavior, and that's what true masculinity is about, as much as about being strong and responsible.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:36 PM
14

Men are not taught to shut up and don’t express what they feel, we constantly open up to people who we want to talk to — our male friends. And we rarely really want to cry about anything. We are taught that we better prioritize solving a problem rather than ramble about it. I think it’s wrong to tell men that they need to be emotional. No. We don’t need that encouragement. It usually comes from women who don’t understand how different men are, and it’s generally a bad advice.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:28 AM
19

Not everyone agrees on that. You choose that — good for you. Most men still choose to be less emotional because that’s how they are. I don’t think it’s wrong to say it’s all right to open up and be weak if you choose so, I think it’s wrong for you to suggest it’s better for everybody to do so. Again, that’s just your suggestion.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:05 AM
8

Choosing to be tough and not talk about issues is not worse than choosing to be weak and open up, I think most men make this choice not because they think they have to, but because they feel it’s better for them. Men are different, people need to stop pushing these memes about “seeming tough”.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 09:53 AM
1

Yes, this seems like healthy masculinity. Getting shit done while not being an asshole.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:09 AM
2

It doesn’t seem like the reason was that, though it may be. Other articles note she was negotiating retiring from the company about a year ago.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 01:03 PM
3

I think that's wrong. Not only to normalize "the game", lie, but also because white males are not protected anyway, so... He did the best he really could. He spoke, and now we all are aware of what a place Google is. It is quite funny how he did what real men were doing for ages -- sacrificed a part of himself for a better future.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:54 PM
1

Doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 12:05 PM
1

Saying no just because you want to prove a point is a form of abuse in the relationship.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 01:31 AM
-4

Dude, that's abuse btw.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 10:04 AM
2

Well, seems like this does not get much press and attention. Kremlin does not want to hear out its own citizens, why would it pay better attention to someone else? I guess it's proven that it can do whatever it wants to do. And that's true in most instances.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 12:41 PM
7

You really gotta understand the mentality. Trying anything? To be shamed in a homophobic culture? To be in danger of arrest, even death? No, thanks. You're either crazy or a hero to try this there.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 12:32 PM
2

It's not like we all crave attention of people who we like, am I right?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:33 PM
1

Why do my balls hurt when I read this?
/r/MensRights22/10/16 03:44 PM
1

Thank you for this example, but I think it is not relevant as it's about a kind of fraud without consent, and the thread article is about a gift.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:00 PM
5

What is there about any rights? She's a cunt, okay. Then what?
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter