TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wave_327 Archive

View 0 posts and 106 comments by wave_327 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

In tennis women get angry all the time Not a big deal
/r/MensRights16/10/23 02:23 AM
4

Are these people even aware that all their policy proposals lead to statism/socialism?
/r/MensRights19/05/23 02:57 AM
2

some guy got acquitted of seven counts of sexual assault so either false accusation rate is impossibly high, or the media dishonestly reports on sexual assault especially when multiple accusers are involved but you obviously have some gut feeling the latter is true
/r/MensRights20/01/23 02:14 PM
9

Whether you defend someone's viewpoint is irrelevant to the mere fact that deplatforming is antithetical to free speech as a concept
/r/MensRights18/11/22 11:46 AM
20

the veneer of liberal democracy just got taken off such sexist, misandrist, Russophobic pieces of shit
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 08:35 AM
413

I don't know which part I hate more, the censorship or the ideological indoctrination
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:32 AM
32

Weren't women groups largely responsible for the growth of the temperance movement in the United States? It seems they did hold some political power pre-universal suffrage
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/22 02:00 PM
6

I guess you weren't around during the Great NNN Purge, I'm now banned in like a dozen subs at this point
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 01:35 AM
8

Yep. The same women who talk up how men are toxic on account of their masculinity are also somehow sexually attracted to the Ukrainian president. Kinda weird doublethink if you ask me
/r/MensRights26/03/22 06:30 AM
7

They are conservatives. As the name implies, they are pro-status-quo (with asterisks, but that is a discussion for another time). It is nice to rely on them for the culture wars, because progressive are going full apeshit, but you can't rely on them for every issue.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 02:18 AM
2

Nobody said it couldn't be bigger
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/21 01:14 AM
20

maybe that's how they usually negotiate for a pay raise /s
/r/AntiFeminists13/08/21 09:34 AM
12

Yet apparently they hate the Mike Pence strategy of having a third person present at every interaction with a woman. It degrades and insults them, so they say. Their double standards are incredible
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/21 04:41 AM
163

Isn't it just market segmentation? If women want to pay more, then companies will market products as more expensive to women
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/21 12:05 PM
0

Using abortion is a poor choice here. Their "opinion" has led them to call to defund Planned Parenthood and harass those who seek to use their services, which has ironically led to increases in abortion because of the drop in access to contraception and counseling services. The "pro-lifers" can go screw themselves
/r/MensRights09/02/21 10:29 PM
9

How much of that is bot-driven though? You never know
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/20 11:43 PM
1

Any examples of self-described feminists decrying this
/r/MensRights29/07/20 05:27 AM
1

Using anime characters So many words and those are the ones that give you the most intense emotional reaction? Seems like you're the immature one for not giving a chance on a different artistic genre
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/20 01:42 AM
9

If there are so many of those tweets how could their "it's a joke" defense hold up? Are they stupid or what
/r/MensRights14/05/20 03:27 AM
0

That's because there is a high correlation between being right-wing and being prejudicial towards a number of well-defined groups of people, which gets reflected in workplace or customer interactions in a negative manner. At least cancel culture is largely confined to the internet
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/20 02:06 PM
2

That's a double-edged sword.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 03:01 AM
1

you were itching to virtue signal about you being vaguely partisan, weren't you could have just said, "oh wapo has a paywall, pls help" but noooooo
/r/MensRights03/05/20 02:57 AM
-3

Not trying to no-true-Scotsman here, but if you're being pushed right by persons and not by ideas, then you don't really hold left-wing ideas as much as you claim to be
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:16 AM
116

#believewomen should have been DOA if people had any modicum of critical thinking skills
/r/MensRights02/02/20 01:52 AM
12

A bit late on the uptake though, didn't this thing happen last year?
/r/MensRights02/02/20 01:51 AM
-12

you did so well until you brought in those shit subs begone you alt right POS
/r/MensRights13/07/19 02:25 AM
2

Or not since bottled anything seems bad for you anyway
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:49 PM
1

If by "significant" you mean "not the majority" then yes. By your logic, every divisive issue is down to personal opinion, even in otherwise clear-cut cases of morality. Say half of a population wants genocide and the other half does not. Are we to give credence to the former because of numbers?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 12:27 PM
1

Huh. Humans have being doing that for ages. This ain't it, man
/r/MensRights14/06/19 01:06 AM
3

Jesus fuck. People accuse me of misunderstanding conservatism on this sub and I get massively downvoted, but here you are clearly misunderstanding "leftism" (whatever that means*) and crickets. Fuck me sideways, man *Assuming you mean democratic socialism
/r/MensRights11/06/19 02:50 AM
1

Better than hoping companies will come to using the profit motive. CO₂ is at 415 ppm, a few years ago it just broke 400. The longer it goes the more drastic shall be the response, and the GND is an expression of this fact
/r/MensRights11/06/19 02:45 AM
0

finance allegations Now this requires a "citation needed" gfdi
/r/MensRights11/06/19 02:30 AM
1

She's on House Oversight and House Financial Services. I could call that powerful
/r/MensRights11/06/19 02:29 AM
0

I can imagine that this thread is a complete dumpster fire, so I will declare upfront that both items of clothing are bad and prejudicial. Downvote at will.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 03:01 AM
-30

Are you REALLY telling me that people IN THE REAL WORLD say this and mean it completely unironically while totally disregarding the societal context that has been previously built up by the actual racists and white supremacists -- you know what, if you can't see my argument, there's no point, but don't downvote me if you think I am wrong because that is very immature of you Edit: please tell me you're a troll because in this sub I cannot tell
/r/MensRights03/05/19 01:21 PM
1

You recognize your comment has jack squat to do with the argument at hand. You make this sub look bad.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 11:33 AM
-52

Same reason wearing a swastika armband in public will give you bad looks. Are you this fucking dumb? Edit: looks like there are more than a few people here who won't bat an eyelid while associating with racists. Perhaps the same kind of people who still ardently believe they could have marched in Charlottesville and say they were just protesting for a statue. How nice.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 11:27 AM
2

I cannot find any other source besides the Illinois Republican who has a clear vested interest in trying to halt HB 2495. I cannot draw any conclusions as yet.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 12:07 PM
2

This. I don't like how some people in this sub are hinting at others to vote for right-wing or far-right parties only because they agree on the men's rights issue, and nothing else. Maybe I'm a bit paranoid, but a wink and nudge is all it takes to get to an electoral outcome nobody will like
/r/MensRights29/04/19 01:36 AM
1

Welp, you're actually a troll. She's 13 in S8 and 15 IRL, the latter is literally in the title
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:41 AM
1

Maybe after the seventeenth time reading I can conclude she's also ageist, because I am looking at the full answer that includes the sensitive quote and still can't find whatever context you're talking about
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:34 AM
2

I wouldn't celebrate just yet. The underlying argument is sound, but she's from Heritage and my opinion of American conservatism remains very poor
/r/MensRights22/04/19 01:32 AM
3

World's gone full The Onion. Crap.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 01:17 AM
6

Shirts get more attention than comet landings, identities get more attention than a picture of a freaking black hole. Either society's attention is heavily misplaced or the media thinks that it is
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:58 AM
2

A real shame that this whole sentiment has been articulated this eloquently a bit too late, for the metaphorical train has already gone off the rails all over this website. I don't know how this situation is even recoverable
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:56 AM
-4

Upvoted because you deserve it Sorry on behalf of these people who don't know better
/r/MensRights10/04/19 02:40 PM
2

you can't just randomly state a thing without the particular post or comment that led you to this decision
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:51 PM
5

you can't equate gendercritical and twox, almost everyone agrees that the former is a bunch of TERFs and cannot be associated with
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:49 PM
478

But should we really be “uncancelling” Johnny after this? We can’t say for sure since his claims aren’t proven true in court yet. AMBER HEARD'S CLAIMS HAVEN'T BEEN PROVEN IN COURT YET YOU NUMBNUT
/r/MensRights26/03/19 02:06 AM
3

why not both? it's not like America's foreskin collagen fetish is replicated elsewhere on earth
/r/MensRights18/03/19 01:45 AM
15

wait, isn't reddit in agreement that big corporations are evil for pushing baby formula in underdeveloped nations over breastfeeding? how is breastfeeding bad?
/r/MensRights18/03/19 01:43 AM
0

Your faux outrage has no power here. Try again tomorrow
/r/MensRights17/03/19 04:01 AM
4

"X should do Y to Z" now means "What would happen should X do Y to Z"? Did I miss a memo or...? Ninja edit: I might be progressive but progressives can do better with their messaging, it's definitely not helping
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:34 AM
10

I'm getting downvoted for consistently sharing this sentiment, how in the fuck do you have upvotes?!
/r/MensRights11/03/19 11:14 PM
-97

Don't interrupt their pro-Trump / pro-right-wing circlejerk. Here and here are some wiki articles Edit: Look, you can't just cry "CenSoRshIp" and then downvote me into oblivion, as a kind of pseudo-censorship (since multi-downvoted comments won't appear on the desktop site by default). I'm simply wondering whether a hidden agenda is at work, and every downvote seems to prove my point
/r/MensRights11/03/19 09:48 AM
-4

Brie made those comments not for Captain Marvel, but for A Wrinkle in Time The boycott was instigated by a conservative hack who thinks the movie is spreading "left-wing propaganda" The heck is this news site, it's for crypto news, not this bullshit TL;DR: how did the mods approve this post
/r/MensRights10/03/19 07:32 AM
1

democrat party aaaaand your credibility's gone piss off t_d poster
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:20 AM
12

You err in two ways: a) you entrench the sexist conception of men as being naturally stiff and unemotional and any deviation from this must be stamped out; and b) adults are also "bitching" about FGM even though it is performed on female human beings younger than them
/r/MensRights02/03/19 04:58 AM
1

Religion is the root of the traditionalist argument. Do you think that the tradition and the ad hoc arguments in support of it would exist without the aegis of religious dogma?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 03:08 AM
17

I would like to add that, being left-leaning, there are an absurd number of organizations mentioned in this sub and elsewhere that I would never like to see as the poster boys for men's rights. Look, I tried searching for "left-leaning MRA" on YouTube and only got videos of MRAs who bash the left. Any guidance on this is very much appreciated
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:06 AM
2

the empire lolwut? The current US Army is large enough that whatever scenarios you have in mind don't need a draft. Maybe if the actual continental US gets invaded, but the world would probably have turned to shit before then
/r/MensRights27/02/19 01:23 AM
3

Better memes than articles from dubious sources
/r/MensRights25/02/19 10:44 AM
-3

How is this even related to feminism? Being sexist implies being a feminist?
/r/MensRights18/02/19 07:33 AM
79

mancelosphere if you are willfully associating yourself with incels, you're gonna have a bad time
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:38 AM
49

If every article on this sub was as reasonable and informative as this one, that'll be great
/r/MensRights28/01/19 09:01 AM
-2

How charitable. "Another political affiliation". That's normalization. That's not right.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:41 AM
-18

This sub borders on insane. Is it absolutely necessary to have ten or so posts on the front page dedicated to this? I hesitate to use the word "deranged", but that seems to be the most suitable word for this shitshow
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:12 AM
-19

Don't you dare bring up that harassment angle as an argument, if that Colorado cake guy was constitutional, so should this. Also, Trumpian policies are in the process of objectively hurting American national security and the stock markets, so there is some level of justification for her actions
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:25 PM
0

I would tolerate "leftist", but what does socialism (an economic philosophy) have anything to do with feminism or gender theory?
/r/MensRights05/01/19 05:28 AM
8

Please tell me where I can find this article, it would be nice for it to be Streisanded all over the internet
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:57 AM
-5

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Ben says shit all the time, so when he is actually joking, I can't tell if it's actually true
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:31 PM
-1

Make a good-faith effort in rejecting the excesses of far-right politics and its rhetoric, especially in this sub as a mod, then we'll talk. 'The far right' being defined as 'anyone who isn't far left like me'. Obvious strawman.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 06:15 AM
33

worst thing is that that incident was revealed to be likely a hoax e: a word
/r/MensRights23/11/18 03:44 PM
27

Wow, talk about hyperbolic. You clearly didn't read the entire source, both sides have demons
/r/MensRights22/11/18 12:59 PM
3

The fact that you had to editorialize the title, and end it off with a definitive "deal with it", just shows how immature you and some others on the sub actually are. You can present evidence without snark. You can argue without resorting to emotional appeal. All you are doing is polarizing this sub further to the extreme. And yet this sub aspires to represent the "mainstream". Well you will never be mainstream if you continue to be as snarky as, by sheer coincidence, alt-right subs on this site…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 01:53 PM
-8

/r/AgainstHateSubreddits look at the kind of content you tacitly tolerate are those people seriously going to reason their way out of their holes
/r/MensRights27/10/18 02:34 AM
-14

posting in <alt-right sub> That should get you banned anywhere, including here. Any "valuable discussion" there is simply just spreading hate and bigotry. Nobody should tolerate that ever.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 12:52 AM
-30

Please tell me the source of this statistic is not "out of your rear end"
/r/MensRights18/10/18 03:38 AM
2

I'm with you. Men's rights cannot afford to be associated with the far-right. Otherwise it would not enjoy the widespread acceptance the people on this sub crave to see from this movement
/r/MensRights10/10/18 03:55 PM
-10

If false accusations against yourself cause you to vote for policies that negatively affect a far greater number of people, then you're quite the selfish prick and/or you secretly approve of neo-conservative policy anyway
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:21 AM
-2

Did you RTFA? which requires publicly traded firms in the state to place at least one woman on their board of directors by the end of 2019 Your idea is so good that you immediately have an IPO and everything?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:39 AM
2

You're right. It would be unreasonable to say that this is representative of all feminists. Maybe if someone could explain to her how this is not constructive... Oh wait that would be mansplaining. nvm
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:33 AM
1

you do know the Chinese government treats that thing like a piece of toilet paper, right
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:08 AM
-1

she's trying to dodge testifying in front of congress Anita Hill? Remember that debacle? She's trying to get the FBI involved in the investigation. I don't know if you know this, but lying to the feds is a fucking crime. liberal anti-trump activist Irrelevant. Edit: Instantly downvoted. Nice. inb4 "Al Franken": Kavanaugh was already dirty before this. He had already perjured himself and there is evidence that he stole information from Senate Democrats during the Bush administration. It can't be …
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:42 AM
3

Don't understand why you were downvoted. I don't think circumcision is on the top shelf of issues feminists are supporting. The main pushback comes from religious traditionalists (because if I use the word "conservative" here, I too will get downvoted to oblivion)
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:26 AM
-37

Even the alt right are less offensive to me than this what the fuck edit: go on, I have karma to burn
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:02 PM
1

welcome to the Internet, bud
/r/MensRights06/08/18 06:05 AM
16

You sound like the kind of person who would shoot me down for misrepresenting the right as a monolithic entity, and yet here you are doing the same to the left. Your attitude can and will put off the progressives in this sub (like me).
/r/MensRights13/07/18 10:07 AM
1

Hear hear.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 12:06 PM
2

And most men in countries with forced male conscription want said conscription to continue. Does that mean it is moral or beneficial to continue with forced male conscription, and not to change it with either forced conscription of both sexes or complete abolishment?
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:39 AM
-3

she might be bragging about it nice allegation without evidence you got there
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:32 AM
2

Nowhere does it say that it is a "problem". It looks like a mere statement of fact. If you want to be better than the feminists, stop creating an "outrage complex" like how feminists have a victimhood complex
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:54 AM
0

Don't worry, you commented to a probable bot account. Barely four days old and only comments here
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:35 AM
-5

Conservatives do not oppose those things for equality's sake, but rather to "return to how it has always been", that is, a bias toward themselves rather than in the opposite direction. Imagine a pendulum swung all the way to the right. Feminists came along and swung it all the way to the left. Modern conservatives are trying to swing it right, not to put it in the middle, but rather to "return to how it has always been", that is, swung all the way to the right. Your stance should be to put it in…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 10:41 AM
1

manipulation of the media Eh, I wouldn't go that far. Not unless I want to sound like I came fresh off of /r/conspiracy. You do not have definite proof that every media conglomerate is somehow paid off by bad interests. It is much easier to claim that the free market favors the kind of media that you and I could claim as "bad". It is then the fault of the consumer for asking for that media in the first place.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 10:33 AM
1

This is the point. The mods can't just ignore the right-wing element in this sub that manufactures outrage and sends the sub's "political center" further and further to the right. The right is dying and we should let it.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:03 AM
0

Opinion: Your argument is bad and you should feel bad. At least try to substantiate. A wrong argument is marginally better than zero argument.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:00 AM
2

Sims is well-known for using unanaesthetized African-American slave women in his experiments regarding gynecology. Maybe by portraying this as "'father of gynecology' statue gets taken down" with no context, OP is deliberately trying to mislead and making this an MRA issue when it isn't
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:26 AM
3

The fact you are being downvoted proves that this sub is unavoidably biased to the right, when it should be politically neutral.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 05:33 AM
1

And then they try to walk it back saying they were "clearly joking". Yeah right...
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:33 AM
1

I'm confused by your comment. Are you saying you want this to be reinstated in the West? Because this isn't an equal treatment of the genders pretty much by definition.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 05:23 AM
1

They have an agenda different and separate from MRM. They are anti-feminist insofar as they would like to reinstate 1950s tradcon gender roles (think "women in their place"), which is not true gender equality. Like I said, this is long-term. The Civil Rights Movement didn't succeed by killing people. Similarly, MRM will not last with alt-right voices, as then they will be associated with them, which isn't a good look.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:31 AM
0

It will not gain widespread acceptance so long as this sub continues to pretend that Sargon, the Daily Mail, InfoWars and Tucker Carlson are "respectable sources". The reality of the world is a slow march toward progressivism, and it is impossible to capture that kind of audience with articles from Fox News and its ilk.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 09:01 AM
0

I don't understand the outrage. No one is unreasonably harmed by changing a couple of words in the national anthem. traditional Figures. You're all conservatives. Seeking true gender equality is supposed to be a progressive idea. That is why I am leaning towards MRM. But I cannot shake the underlying, unspoken hostility conservatives have over progressives. Why?
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:37 AM
1

Are you suggesting that the entire idea of transsexuality doesn't exist?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:33 AM
11

Trump drinking water I agree that, devoid of context, drinking water is NBD. But Trump CHASTISED RUBIO DURING THE PRIMARY FOR DRINKING WATER. HE MOCKED RUBIO FOR DRINKING WATER DURING A SPEECH. HE TWEETED ABOUT IT. He’s a motherfucking hypocrite. That’s the real story here.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 12:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter