TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wavegeekman Archive

View 3 posts and 380 comments by wavegeekman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

This would be valid if it were not for the fact that, as OP pointed out, colleges actively discriminate against men who want to get "highly educated".
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:58 AM
47

Violence = anything that happens that a feminist doesn't like. As long as it is done by a man. E.g. giving someone the silent treatment = violence, but only if done by a man. Because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:03 AM
-3

Half of what you describe is hobbies (gardening) or indulging obsessions (top to bottom cleaning of the house on a weekly basis). With modern labor saving machinery, managing a household is not a hard or full-time job. This is why women dominate the viewership on TV - they have far more free time than men.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:13 PM
-10

Not only that, but there is far less depth in women's tennis and as result far more one-sided matches. So it is not even like three sets as hard as men would play them. Women's sport is a joke - apart from sex appeal - and in a fair world would be relegated to the Special Olympics and similar events. It is no coincidence that Anna Pornokova was one of the leading earners in women's tennis for a long time, even when she had not won a single tournament.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:06 PM
-7

Years ago, pre WWW, I commented in response to a particularly loopy feminist's posting, that feminism was a parody of women's thinking. Someone then pointed out that feminism is, in fact, nothing more or less than women's thinking. Women basically built this edifice of illogic all on their own. Example: the feminist idea that "gender is just a social construction". Women live in a world that consists almost entirely of social processes. Read any book by a woman, or watch a chick flick. Nothing e…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 06:21 PM
2

If this is true then why do women dress up when they go out but not when they stay home? If you tart up when going out, you are doing it to attract other men. Your husband knows this and so do you. Thus the old joke that men want a women who is a lady in public but the opposite in private. What you often get is a lady in private and the opposite in public.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:37 AM
5

Rape isn't about sex it is about power and violence. This nonsense has been comprehensively debunked again and again. Please stop repeating it.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 05:26 PM
5

Women have it worse anyway in general so I should just be thankful I am male. Live longer More money spent on their medical care and research Work less Spend more money Automatically get child custody Far less like to commit suicide Far less likely to be a victim of violent crime Far less likely to be imprisoned Lighter sentences for the same crime. More likely to graduate from school and college Earn comparable salaries when qualifications, danger, experience and working ours are taken into acc…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 12:43 AM
6

Same here. I have trouble coming to orgasm from intercourse. Usually extra measures of some kind are needed, unless it has been a long time since I had sex. I have excessively high levels of stress hormones (cortisol/cortisone) which are associated with pain or illness in childhood, such as MGM. In turn the high cortisol has damaged by retina and made it difficult to keep my weight down and to gain and retain muscle mass. I was done on the bogus grounds that I had phimosis. In fact, a boy's fore…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 12:38 AM
4

I find it nauseating to see a man who hates his own sex like this. Anyone who thinks that women are all sweetness and light has not seen an all-female institution (such as a girls' school with almost all female teachers) in action.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 11:03 PM
3

something like 10,000 to 18,000 erogenous nerve endings the female clit has 8,000 nerve endings Which gives the lie to claims that FGM is much more severe. Male circumcision costs more nerve endings than cutting off the entire head of the clitoris!
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:44 PM
3

Also noteworthy After the bombshell, DNA testing was ordered by a court. Mr Lloyd Jones said : 'He’s clearly been through a great deal including dealing with a very serious false allegation made by this defendant to the police.' This evil woman also knowingly made false allegations against the man. On second thoughts this is not very noteworthy as false allegations made by women for tactical reasons are a dime a dozen.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:37 PM
11

no one should be able to dictate or legislate what a person can do with their own body. Very few MRAs would disagree. However this right should also extend to men. If you want to have a baby, fine, but I should have the option to opt out. That is a "financial abortion". Men are being imprisoned for not being able to pay child support due to unemployment. Men are paying child support for other men's children. Men's children are adopted away without them having any say in the matter. Boys were wer…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:57 PM
11

I definitely agree that everyone should be given due process when facing criminal charges. But real existing feminism actively opposes this.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:53 PM
8

It just seems to me like feminism and MR are two sides of the same coin and we would both get a lot more accomplished if we could work together. This is true of one brand of feminism in theory, but not in practice. In practice we see feminists constantly attacking men's rights and ignoring men's problems and their views. Men's problems are seen as just minor downsides of their overwhelming partriarchal advantages, and men's opinions are dismissed as "mansplaining". Yes most CEOs and politicians …
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:51 PM
1

The net result is that men are socially isolated in our society. I think you might be overstating this. I'm organizing a school reunion, some decades on. It's interesting... What I've noticed is the depth and breadth (in time and space) of the men's social networks. For this reason it has been easy to find the men. Whereas the women by and large have "moved on" and have few or no friends left from those days. The women's relationships have been less enduring and possibly more superficial as well…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:23 AM
52

Don't worry they'll go in full force when it comes for him to pay child support. Yes male victims of child sexual abuse get to pay child support.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:50 AM
-2

Exactly. It's OK if we do it, but God forbid guys try and work out what is effective and how women think. Just as if a man walks out on his wife he is a cad, but a woman who leaves her husband, well it must be the man's fault and also she is so admirable and so courageous ...
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:43 AM
2

Naomi Wolf used to be a fan of Katy Perry So much for her credibility
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:33 AM
20

Maybe the men are "intimidated" by her obesity and ugliness rather than by her job in a bureaucracy.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 10:01 PM
39

The right of boys to grow up with intact bodies is very much a legitimate Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:36 AM
2

are simply the leaders of the party with the most seats in Parliament So much fail here. The PM is the person who can win a confidence motion in the parliament. Nothing to do with how many seats his or her own party has.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:54 PM
6

What he means is She was installed by the factional warlords in between elections. Voters did not have a direct say. This after pledging undying loyalty to the previous Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. In the subsequent election the opposition got more votes and more seats in parliament and she only won government by making back room deals with the independents, who went against majority opinion among their constituents. And she retained government via a sleazy deal in which she induced an opposition …
/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:50 PM
2

we have no draft in the forseeable future I am so glad you can predict the future. What will the DJIA index be on 1/1/2013? Factually though we had the draft in my lifetime, and I only missed out by a couple of years. I know a few older guys who are wrecks and/or suicided due to the trauma of Vietnam. And now, we have men forced into the military by judges as their only alternative to going to prison.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:12 AM
7

Women being treated like shit in the Middle East (being punished for being raped)? Feminism has a role to play in correcting that. I think, in fact I am sure, that 99% of MRAs in western countries would totally agree with correcting that also. MRAs generally support equality of opportunity and the removal of discrimination. This is classic liberal feminism (in the original meaning of the word "liberal"). I personally supported these feminist ideals, e.g. by marching in demonstrations, when I was…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:01 AM
1

I doubt this. The fact that very few uncircumcised men choose to have part of their penis removed suggests that you would not either. So you are probably in denial about the harm done to you, or you are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 08:54 AM
7

Yet another regurgitation of the "not all feminists are like that" / "why can't we all get along" argument. Read their books. Have a look at the platforms and activities of the main feminist organizations. Yes they are like that. Reproductive rights for women but not for men (no "financial" abortion) Conscription for men but not women Automatic child custody for women Alimony for life and beyond Denial of the existence of false rape claims Women must be believed and never lie as men go to jail o…
/r/MensRights23/03/12 10:33 PM
0

Liar. There is only one such comment and it had been downvoted to oblivion.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 10:20 PM
-10

A very common story. Lose your job, or get sick and your wife will leave you - 90% probability. woman loyalty Pick one. This may sound misogynistic. But it just reflects evolution. Once a man ceases to be a good provider, the female brain starts to make the woman unhappy with him. She feels bad about him and therefore feels it is right to leave. I have seen this many times.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 08:34 AM
4

it doesn't matter if you have a problem or not. The point of the story is that you will be forced to leave the carriage.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 12:37 AM
4

Many words to say you have no evidence. Last time I was robbed the majority of the gang were women. (In Shanghai in 2007). Women cheat and commit crimes in different ways than men but I have never seen any solid evidence that women are more ethical than men.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 12:32 AM
5

If there were men's only coaches no one would travel in them BS. There were plenty of men's only spaces until they were banned.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 12:31 AM
12

And supposedly it's irrelevant that she may have made false claims in the past. In fact publicizing her name would allow people who have been falsely accused in the past to come forward. But... feminism... women never make false claims whatareyousaying?
/r/MensRights22/03/12 10:12 PM
2

As others have pointed out, for the benefit of the wilfully blind, the MR aspect of this is that a man was attacked and could not defend himself. He could not defend himself because "never hit a woman ever". If a man defends himself, he will be charged. Even if he doesn't defend himself, he may be charged: "Judge Rucker Smith, of Sumter County, Georgia, was assaulted by his ex-girlfriend. Even though she had instigated the incident and he did not retaliate, he was charged with battery. A jury la…
/r/MensRights22/03/12 05:49 AM
1

As others have pointed out, for the benefit of the wilfully blind, the MR aspect of this is that a man was attacked and could not defend himself. He could not defend himself because "never hit a woman ever". If a man defends himself, he will be charged. Even if he doesn't defend himself, he may be charged: "Judge Rucker Smith, of Sumter County, Georgia, was assaulted by his ex-girlfriend. Even though she had instigated the incident and he did not retaliate, he was charged with battery. A jury la…
/r/MensRights22/03/12 05:10 AM
2

prevents female abusers from getting help. Not to mention the victims of female abusers (which include men and also women in often-violent lesbian relationships).
/r/MensRights22/03/12 04:46 AM
3

Common reasons for false rape accusations: Excuse. She got caught out being unfaithful and is not prepared to accept responsibility for her actions. Revenge. I am upset at him and he will pay. Ironically, in many cases false accusations result when a men rejects a woman's advances. [This has been going on for a long time and there are even ancient Greek plays about the subject - http://www.gradesaver.com/hippolytus/study-guide/short-summary/] Alibi. I was AWOL / failed my class / got drunk and c…
/r/MensRights22/03/12 04:10 AM
2

Proof, it that were needed, that feminism is not about equality. While some dictionaries say that feminism is a movement for equality, in reality it is all about advantaging (some) women at the expense of men and children.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 04:04 AM
1

No but here used to be; he was just using it as an analogy.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 09:03 PM
5

One noteworthy aspect of this that there was no surprise expressed in the story that a female would be violent. Perhaps this reflects the increasing awareness that women can be and are violent. Secondly the woman/girl's attempts to deny responsibility for her actions. She stabbed the boy but then said "I didn't mean to do it".
/r/MensRights21/03/12 01:32 AM
3

There are plenty of ancient religious customs that we do not tolerate any longer, such as Burning witches at the stake Stoning to death children who swear in the presence of their parents Slavery Stoning adulterers to death Genital mutilation of baby girls Why should genital mutilation of baby boys be tolerated? inb4 someone plays the anti-semitism card. I am against genital mutilation of baby boys or girls by anyone, of any race or creed.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 10:48 AM
1

Circumcision has cost you maybe 30% of the nerve endings in your penis. What do you think would be a percentage at which it would start to be a problem? Yet another case of denial / Stockholm syndrome.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:43 AM
3

Any guy who has been circumcised as a kid will tell you that these drama <derogatory term deleted> on here are fully exaggerating Not true. Clearly adults need to make decisions on behalf of children, however making a decision that results in significant pain for a period of days or weeks, that irreparably mutilated the child, that has a risk of infection and death, and which has no clear benefits - this is a different category than beneficial dental treatment.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:39 AM
7

I actually had a female friend confide in me that that was exactly her plan. Find a good provider, have the kids and divorce him at a convenient time. And she did it too. the guy didn't know what hit him. She is currently in the process of spending her divorce settlement on herself.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:52 AM
3

I'm glad you are, or at least say you are, a feminist in the sense of being in favor of equality. 99% of MRAs would be feminists by that definition. Such as me. I even participated in demonstrations for women's rights years ago. It would be more convincing though it you would quote some examples of actions you have taken to further those equal rights.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:09 AM
5

I say "I like feminism as it's defined in the dictionary. That is, as a movement for equality. It's real existing feminism, with its man-hating and bigotry and what it does to men and children that I oppose".
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:03 AM
0

Let's apply your "logic" to racism: Honestly, I think hating racism should be looked down upon as well. Take what Quentin Tarantino says in this: http://badassdigest.com/2011/11/03/film-crit-hulk-smash-never-hate-a-movie/. It's about the stupidity of hating movies, but it applies to a lot more than just cinema. What's letting a person or ideal rile you up do for you, anyways? Are you really saying you can look at a racist and say exactly what kind of person they are, or what their exact beliefs …
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:01 AM
3

This argument is getting very old. When feminists stop being virulently anti-male, let's have this conversation. Real existing feminism has nothing to do with equality and fairness.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:56 AM
10

This just reinforces their complete self-absorption and the lack of empathy that feminists have towards men.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:27 AM
3

You need to get out of the relationship, but getting out is a dangerous process. If you walk out today, there is a real risk she will ring the cops and have you charged with DV. Some resources at the end. Ideally you would a) get strong evidence of her physically abusing you, and b) make her lose interest in the relationship so that you just kind of drift apart. If you can show her your are immune to her words, she may escalate (but this may be dangerous for you). Maybe one of your friends could…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:25 AM
1

Well 1,000 gives you a 3% standard deviation. So if you wanted to be 99% sure (3 stds), you should say "more than 1%".
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:44 PM
6

As Obama said "well, that was the idea".
/r/MensRights14/03/12 04:54 AM
3

No. Eg Female general manager shouting and ranting and raving, later had to apologize to the whole department for her "anger management issues". I suspect the difference may be that it is psychologically normal for a man to be ambitious, so men don't need any degree of psychological abnormality to be ambitious. Yes they can be selfish jerks but they are predictable and if you help them win there is no problem. Most normal women are just not that ambitious. They seem to need some sort of "thing" …
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:02 PM
5

The (Australian) ABC is a real bastion of feminism; this is typical of their form.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 07:29 AM
24

This conflation of "women and children" is a common ploy among feminists. It makes it sound like women are the main victims when, as in this case, they are not. For the record, this was an appalling and shocking atrocity. Even more reason to report it without bias.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:43 AM
0

I'm pretty confident Argument by assertion. Very impressive. I have heard of many cases of false accusations, and not one where the "victim" recanted without being shown to be a liars. Locking women in jails for thirty years is good revenge, but it doesn't help men's rights any, and if we do it for people who admit their guilt and get the victim out of trouble ASAP, it probably harms them instead. Yes it will. It will discourage other liars from making false accusations.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 05:00 AM
2

That's right, the woman who was allegedly raped by DSK admitted to previously lying about being raped in a sworn and signed affidavit. She lied: get over it.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 01:39 AM
1

BS. When you look at these cases they only admit it when it is blindingly obvious they are lying.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 01:31 AM
3

Male politicians were sick of being shafted themselves.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:06 AM
1

The problem is though, as usual, the man is held to his side of the deal while the woman gets to change her mind. Accountability: for men only.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 02:24 AM
2

That's right, if we were just quiet and polite like those nice colored folk, they would listen to us. Not. Obviously those people are not interested in the truth. They could not even get the meaning of "mangina" and "white knight right".
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:33 AM
0

Also conscription, which I was subject to. Also "child support" for people who are not your children, jailing when unable to pay, alimony. The government is right into controlling men's bodies.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:58 AM
0

Nijuro is a troll from SRS.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:45 PM
-3

You are a woman in one respect at least: you like telling people what they are and are not allowed to say. That said, I will try to be respectful. You have a point that trans are discriminated against, including by feminists. Many feminists have the view that, having been born with the horror tool of power (the penis), trans people are men and have the "privileges" of men. As such they are not welcome in many feminist forums. In that sense trans people are natural allies to MRAs. Some MRAs find …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:31 PM
9

especially against a girl White knight detected
/r/MensRights05/03/12 01:21 PM
4

In unrelated news, there are very few men who want to go into teaching.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 01:17 PM
13

"men need women like a bank needs a bank robber." Got it in one.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:01 AM
1

"I mean... if I approached one of these girls at a bar or at a party she'd look at me (I'm not some hideous fucking chudd, but I'm no Jason Statham) like "How... dare you talk to me" and make snide comments to her friends about me, in front of me, until I left.". Really, guys? Yes, really. In feminist circles, telling the truth is considered bad manners.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:58 AM
4

New Zealand could not invade a children's playground if their lives depended on it.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:56 AM
7

Buying fast food is the saddest thing ever. Hearing someone say "Have a nice day" who normally would not look at your sideways. Reading a romantic novel is the saddest thing ever. Why can't a women be satisfied with a relationship with an actual real man? etc etc Fantasy is fantasy. Sex is sex. If your husband to be has fun, it's fine. If you want to do him a favor, read up on Marriage 2.0 and educate your husband to be on the grave risk he is taking. inb4 Not all women are like that. The one I'…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:35 AM
3

The dictionary definition of feminism states that it is a movement in favor of equality. Real existing feminism however does not favor equality.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:20 AM
-3

In the dictionary, feminism is about equality. In the real world feminism is about women only and f**k the men.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:01 PM
4

This was approved by the discrimination board. Their reasoning was that the reason to exclude the women was to keep heterosexual men away. And of course discriminating against heterosexual men is just fine.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 08:21 AM
14

It's in the best interests of the child that women should be able to lie about who the father is!
/r/MensRights03/03/12 08:17 AM
11

The Catholic Church supporting child abuse. Who would have thought it?
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:27 PM
1

This was in Ireland, which has apparently abolished the offence of criminal defamation. However there are offences of criminal defamation in many places. Wikipedia: Criminal defamation (US) At the federal level, there are no criminal defamation or insult laws in the United States. However, on the state level, 19 states and 2 territories as of 2005 had criminal defamation laws on the books: Colorado (Colorado Revised Statutes, § 18-13-105), Florida (Florida Statutes, § 836.01-836.11), Georgia, (O…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:11 AM
6

I think this guy has a point. Society as a whole believes that women are discriminated against, get a terrible deal, etc. When you look into it, it's just not true. But people believe it. Feminism is supported by Christians and Atheists alike, by Right and Left wing alike. if a woman hits a man it's "how is he to blame" but when a man hits a women, even in self defense, it's unacceptable. Men built civilization but somehow we have been talked into believing that men are the embodiment of evil.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:01 AM
1

It's in the best interests of the child for the mother to be happy.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 06:15 AM
10

This is the bottom line. No-one gives a f**k about men's problems. Especially those most empathetic of creatures, feminists.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 05:01 AM
4

""An attempted suicide is not really an attempt at suicide in about 95 percent of cases. It is a different phenomenon. It's most often an effort to bring someone's attention, dramatically, to a problem that the individual feels needs to be solved. Suicide contains a solution in itself," he says." This.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 04:59 AM
6

Right. If you are serious about killing yourself you kill yourself. Taking 6 Tylenols and ringing your friend is not a suicide attempt.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 04:58 AM
11

Women watch a lot more television than men, and most of it is mindless game shows and rubbish like "Sex and the City". But for men to actively play video games is the worst thing ever.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:35 PM
2

I suspect she passed the fitness test on entrance - just barely. Who would you want at your fire - a girl who barely scraped through or someone with capacity to spare?
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:38 AM
-1

You don't get the point. It is a slightly subtle statistical issue. If women are on average weaker than men, more of them will barely pass the test. The test defines the minimum acceptable level, not the optimum. The more people you have who barely pass the less margin you have for error.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:36 AM
0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HDmFsAc1Rw
/r/MensRights27/02/12 01:44 AM
-16

Even where the test is the same, then given women are on average weaker than men, most women will have barely passed the test. So they are still going to be 'carried' to some extent. Better than two different tests though.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 01:44 AM
7

Actually it is notorious how badly gay men and women get on. Not sure why but a fair percentage of lesbians I know have a well developed case of tripod rage.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:36 AM
1

Most girls will say that they want a nice guy. I think the problem is guys listening to what women say they want, and then delivering that, and finding it is not in fact what women want. They feel misled because they were misled, deliberately or not. One could argue they were naive etc but the fact is if someone tells you untruths you are likely to be annoyed. Or more pithily 2012 Still believing women's advice about relationships These guys need to take the red pill and see women as they really…
/r/MensRights25/02/12 05:11 AM
15

Be careful. She make take preventive action to sequester your assets. You may be wise to consult a lawyer to make sure she can't get her hands on the money. Some jurisdictions impute a duty to provide for the child in the will and of course we know that means that the mother gets the money to spend as she pleases.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 04:57 AM
2

These extra steps only add thirty or so seconds for each women You have obviously never shared a house with several females. 30 seconds - if only!
/r/MensRights25/02/12 04:39 AM
1

There is no inherent reason for only children to be spoiled brats. My daughter is an only child and is disciplined, hard-working (4.0 GPA) and honest. It is just a matter of how the parents bring them up. If you want to know how, read "Parent Effectiveness Training" the book.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 04:36 AM
5

People in rural China need a son because daughters marry out of the family and go away. Sons stay around and look after their parents in old age. These people have very rational reasons for wanting a son. It is not a matter of being patriarchal asshats as you suggested. If your being fed in old age depended on having a son, I would suggest you too would be keen to have a son. Learn the facts before abusing people. This is an interesting one because according to feminist dogma, 'fetuses' are just…
/r/MensRights25/02/12 04:33 AM
4

Everyone has some level of anxiety. What a crock. They always have some BS excuse, like this one. Women never take responsibility for their actions.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:17 PM
8

That was removed and that seems to have stuck. You can use Wikipedia's rules for the good eg remove any feminist statement that is not justified by a credible source (see the wikipedia guidelines).
/r/MensRights24/02/12 04:13 AM
9

as long as you're not acting like a jackass at work your business will probably be safe No.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:34 PM
7

You see this all the time, without any consciousness of the irony. Women are in fact the majority. Because men die younger. If women died younger, would men go around boasting that they are the majority? Just another example of the lack of compassion that many women and feminists in particular have for men.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 05:18 AM
7

Except real existing feminism has nothing to do with equality. NOW opposed presumption of equal custody. NOW opposes women being forced to register for the draft. NOW opposes funding for male victims of domestic violence. NOW supports lifetime alimony. NOW supports rape convictions without proof (woman's allegation is enough). NOW opposes due process for men accused of sexual assault (Dead Colleague letter to colleges). and on and on it goes.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:30 AM
2

"I do not believe in any gods" and "I believe there is no god" are completely not the same statement, and the main difference is that the latter requires faith. Religious people tend to believe that - that the only reason for a positive belief is faith. But it's not true. One can weigh the evidence and decide that something is true or false. Many atheists have done this. You probably have a similar position on the existence of Santa Claus. Would you say "it takes faith to believe there is no San…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:38 AM
14

No she is saying women need to put on their big girl panties and take responsibility for their actions and words. If you consent or do not consent, it is your responsibility to communicate this.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:19 AM
7

Does one have to understand that they are doing something unlawful, in order for it to become a crime? This issue was dealt with in the article, if you had bothered to actually read it. We assume the man knows that rape is illegal, that is not in dispute. The issue is that if a woman gives every indication of consent, but secretly does not consent, the man did not know she was not consenting. His ignorance was not of the law but of the facts, due to his being unable to read the woman's mind. The…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:18 AM
6

Sorry no-one buys the lie about feminism being about equality any more.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:00 AM
6

One day she asked Justin if he smoked pot. Even though he didn’t smoke marijuana, the love-struck teen promised to help find some for her. Every couple of days she would text him asking if he had the marijuana. Finally, Justin was able to get it to her. She tried to give him $25 for the marijuana and he said he didn’t want the money — he got it for her as a present. The cop took advantage of the kid's feelings for her to get him to commit the crime. It said he didn't even smoke pot, so he wouldn…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 09:47 AM
5

There is no harm, and perhaps a lot of good, in getting input and ideas before making such a decision. Given that over 100 boys die from circumcision every year in the US, this would literally be a matter of life and death.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 09:07 AM
5

it doesnt bother me You are asserting a counterfactual here. What would your life be like if you were not circumcised? Would you perhaps enjoy sex more, find it easier to satisfy women, be more emotionally available, less prone to anger and violence, have lower stress levels and stress hormones and find it easier to control your weight (all things associated with not being circumcised)? I would suggest that a subjective opinion here is worth little - like the people who claim that corporal punis…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 09:05 AM
-3

tenant => tenet http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tenant http://www.thefreedictionary.com/tenet
/r/MensRights16/02/12 08:55 AM
2

The disunity and hatred within feminism is a sight to behold.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 07:30 AM
9

I'm sure the officer wouldn't have if it was a female, but that's besides the point. It is exactly the point.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:29 AM
-3

I think the truth is more subtle than that. It's true that women are attracted to successful powerful ambitious men, but not in a rational way. Their recognition process for such men is very simplistic and easily hacked. You do not have to be successful powerful and ambitious you just need to look like you are. PUA is the accumulated set of hacks designed to allow you to fake it. Please read the above paragraph again! We men think women are so subtle and deep and they actually are so shallow tha…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:27 AM
1

should When dealing with people, that word can cause a lot of pain. Better to focus on what is than wishful thinking. Women are how they are. Take the red pill and see the truth.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:18 AM
9

while being male was maybe a factor, this seems like much more of a racism issue (as the blogger states himself) than a sexism one. Because a white woman with a black child would have gotten exactly the same treatment. Ri-ight.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:50 PM
2

There is a deep truth here. A lot of guys think "my woman is not like this". The trouble is, as long as the woman is favorably disposed to you, she will be nice to you. When that feeling is gone, the gloves come off and nothing, however horrible, is unjustified. Eg once the divorce is done and the ex has a new boyfriend, she will probably feel that she wants you out of her life. False accusations of child abuse, rape, whatever it takes, it all seems justified to the female rationalization hamste…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:05 AM
2

The only problem is that your proposed solution is idiotic. The legal system already takes into account the mitigating factor when people voluntarily confess to their crimes - something by the way that is very rare for false rape accusers.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:44 AM
1

This is already the case. A person who freely owns up to a crime is treated more leniently than one who is found out. Most of the cases I have seen of recanted false claims of rape were when the evidence against the claim became overwhelming. In a few cases, women were caught because they boasted about it to their friends.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:42 AM
2

And more damning evidence here. The world HQ of the Patriarchy, where these dastardly deeds are plotted. http://imgur.com/Rv3dq
/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:13 AM
5

Women Loyalty Pick one.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:24 PM
6

What he means is that you cannot have an expectation of reasonable behavior from her. If she decides to dump him and estrange him from his children, make false accusations, etc nothing can be done. For those who want to take your chances, the book "The Married Man Sex Life Primer 2011" by Athol Kay may be your best hope.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 04:02 AM
1

Great article and it shows that feminism has been the same all along. It just took some of us a while to see the awful truth. Quote from feminist Carol Hanisch's article, “Men's Liberation”, from the Redstockings anthology, Feminist Revolution: “Men's liberationists always bring up ‘confronting their own feelings about men’ by which they mean homosexuality. Male homosexuality is an extension of the reactionary club) meaning both group and weapon). The growth of gay liberation carries contempt fo…
/r/MensRights30/01/12 04:00 AM
21

You need to understand that so-called "logic" is just a tool of the patriarchy. If a feminist feels something, it is true, regardless of how unfactual or irrational it is.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 12:18 AM
22

Vegans are deficient in DHA which is essential for normal brain function. This is one reason they have such wacky ideas.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 09:06 AM
0

Argument by sarcasm. Surely even a feminist can do better than this.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 10:28 PM
13

Smith also has a prior domestic-abuse charge involving her son. She received a suspended prison sentence and probation, and testimony indicated she was successful and completed it early. Yeah real successful. So successful she kidnapped and abused two more children. If this is success, what does failure look like?
/r/MensRights24/01/12 10:39 AM
1

That is true for the simple reason that they lack the power to enforce their views. When it had the power it put "heretics" to death. Even today the Catholic Church is trying to enforce its views on others through the power of the state.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 06:39 AM
3

ignoring "no" when you're hitting on someone Isn't it wonderful when life's so simple In one informal study, in a majority of married couples the woman had declined the offer to marry on the man's first try. This sort of thing has happened to me: ask a woman out, she says no, ask her again, she says yes. Women train men to not take no for an answer. If women want men to take no for an answer they need to consistently mean it. Google "shit test" if you want to know more. inb4 feminists denying re…
/r/MensRights24/01/12 06:28 AM
1

How about you have a look at the research into impact rather than just spouting off your personal opinion?
/r/MensRights24/01/12 02:40 AM
5

It's interesting that the article implicitly confirms the fact that divorce is bad for children, contrary to feminist dogma.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 04:02 AM
17

The problem here is the definition of "able to pay". You are "able to pay" even if unemployed and unable to get a job because you should be able to get a job and you should be able to earn that much money. This regardless of how hard you have tried to get a job and any related personal crises or problems. The icing on the cake is that because this is a civil matter you don't get due process rights or a court appointed defender. Of course if you are in prison, you are in prison. The fact that you…
/r/MensRights22/01/12 09:28 PM
3

Teachable moment here. My response in that situation was "why don't you get a feminist to carry it for you".
/r/MensRights22/01/12 07:50 AM
-2

Rape is a terrible thing Rape is a bad thing but let's not fall into feminist hyperbole here. The impact of being raped is about the same as being beaten up. But the penalties are far far higher for rape.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 01:01 AM
-10

No. He posts links from all over the place. Stop lying. On second thoughts I withdraw that. Asking a feminist to stop lying is an exercise in futility.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:34 PM
2

... the board of directors of the NY branch, not the whole organization.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:31 PM
14

Funny all the dead people whose names have been released so far are men. Still the feminists whine on.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:14 AM
-1

So there's at least one feminist on my sinking ship Binary. So you say now. But it's funny how all the feminists disappear at the crucial moment.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 10:39 AM
29

As Hilary Clinton so insightfully put it, the women survivors are worse off than the men who died. Because they have to carry on without their husbands / boyfriends. Thanks to the patriarchy, the men get off easy.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 10:38 AM
4

My sister and her friend would never fabricate a lie this severe. ... would never really lie On the basis of this you beat someone up? If you had been constructive in this situation she might have gone to police and saved someone else from being raped, assuming it was true.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 07:16 AM
10

parallels between feminism and other hate groups such as white nationalists and extremist right-wing Christians Fixed that for ya
/r/MensRights09/01/12 09:28 PM
2

supposed to go to the kid But it was paid to the mother under false pretences with no accountability that a cent of it was spent on the child.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 09:14 PM
4

Yes it must be the patriarchy http://rdwolff.com/sites/default/files/harriet.gif Feminist Marxist Psychologist Other than the above, she is a very sound thinker.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 08:55 PM
7

He needs to know that his father is a milquetoast who didn't stand up for him when it mattered. And that his mother is a person who chose to have his body mutilated for no good reason.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 08:37 PM
3

Husbands were liable for a wife's debts, which could be incurred by contract, purchases, or by being sued. In theory this liability was limited to "necessities" but this limitation had little effective force. You can find this in any legal history text book.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 06:25 AM
6

I later found out that Tyson's lawyer was prevented from introducing evidence of the accuser's previous false rape claims because of rape shield laws. Given this - and how long it took the jury to convict him even without that information - I would now lean to the view that he is probably innocent.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 03:14 AM
15

Everyone is prison is innocent, according to them. Tyson has consistently denied raping the woman. The evidence was not bulletproof by any means. The jury took 10 hours to agree on a conviction. Wikipedia: "Alan Dershowitz filed an appeal on Tyson's behalf alleging that the victim had a history of at least one false accusation of rape,[48] that she had offered to drop charges in return for $1 million[49][50] and that the judge had blocked testimony from witnesses who would have contradicted Wash…
/r/MensRights01/01/12 10:47 AM
6

No in fact the Editor of the News of the World and Head of News International at various relevant times was a woman. She claimed to be shocked, just shocked and surprised, amazed, to hear this was going on under her watch. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_International_phone_hacking_scandal#Rebekah_Brooks
/r/MensRights31/12/11 10:12 PM
4

That range should be 0-0 sexual partners. And there is not much evidence that being religious helps. Even in the best circumstances you are still handing the woman a loaded gun with a license to ruin your life. How lucky do you feel, mate?
/r/MensRights31/12/11 07:24 AM
3

At the time, the report states, Flanagan had been warned about his responsibility to comply with board policies and follow the proper procedures "should he feel the need to attend to the emotional needs of students in the future." God forbid that a teacher should feel the need to attend to the emotional needs of his students! Also to this idea that he retired... this may be technically true but the fact is he was forced to an early retirement by these zealots. And people wonder why there are few…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 08:25 PM
5

The thing is though that you are privileging rules over outcomes and actual good teaching. Here is a teacher who cares about his students and helps them. Against that he is allegedly breaking rules that exist because someone harming students might also break those rules. This is typical of bureaucrats - all they care about is process, not outcomes.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 08:22 PM
1

They don't provide any evidence whatsoever that actual rapes are linked to their so-called "rape proclivity". The statistical significance was not there (even at 5% level) so they kept torturing the data until they found something significant. Unfortunately that is called data mining and is invalid. In spite of these fatal flaws it is of a higher quality than most feminist research.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 07:07 AM
2

If you already know the answer, why bother doing the study?
/r/MensRights29/12/11 06:59 AM
4

Back in the slave days they used to circumsize male black slaves. It was done to make them less likely to rape nice white girls. Just more of the same I guess. Plus religious zealots looking for a justification for bronze age practices.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 06:51 AM
5

I took my first gender studies course and I thought it was going to be a crock of shit I don't buy this. Why would you take a course thinking it would be rubbish? I have read the course notes for the local gender studies course and what I found was: A complete indifference to truth and evidence as opposed to vacuous speculation. Lip service paid to equality but in reality it was all "men bad women good".
/r/MensRights26/12/11 07:51 PM
1

Statuatory rape laws apply to both genders In theory but not in practice (practise if you are American). BTW learn to spell.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 07:42 PM
2

This is a good idea.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 07:57 PM
2

I think The Good Men Project has gone over to the dark side. The resignation of mangina POS Hugo Schwyzer was a good sign for sure. Of course, given the kind of people GMP are I reserve judgement that perhaps they are just trying to ingratiate themselves with men without really changing their feminist/man-hostile agenda.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 07:56 PM
1

I draw the analogy with Crack Cocaine. What killed it was people seeing older brothers and cousins and their friends wrecked by the drug. The word is seeping out about Marriage 2.0. These things take time.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 09:26 PM
2

It's funny how the cafeteria-religious choose to follow some parts of their sacred infallible book but not others: eg Women who are not virgins on their wedding night to be stoned to death: "If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her ... and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid: Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate: And the damsel's fat…
/r/MensRights23/12/11 09:00 PM
6

Agree. This is a common syndrome with people who have been damaged in all sorts of ways. For example, the people who are proud that they never learned Math at school. Or the people who were beaten by their parents "it didn't do me any harm". People feel you are attacking who they are. It takes a bit of courage to overcome this tendency.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:20 AM
0

I had one. The evidence is inconclusive but it seems to be linked to Benign Prostate Hypertrophy, which is not that serious. Otherwise it is the trade-off between possibly not being able to have children later on, versus "surprise" babies if you do not have a vasectomy and the misery that that can entail.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:15 AM
7

No I think what he's saying is if women are so independent etc etc, let them prove it. Don't need a man? Fine - no-one will marry you. Don't need a man? Fine - carry your own suitcase. This can be fun - A woman asks for a help with a heavy object, you agree and then say thoughtfully - "Actually i have a better idea - get a feminist to help you!" Don't need a man. Fine. I will not support you through earning a high income and paying high taxes (men going their own way). When you look at many of t…
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:56 AM
-1

Don't jump to the conclusion you are the father. If she is the kind of person you say, it is possible someone else is the father. There have been a number of cases where women have announced surprise pregnancies to men who have had vasectomies (that were still working). And then they got a surprise. Often in such cases the outcome, when the women realizes she has failed to get her target on the hook, is an abortion. It's funny I was just reading Aristophanes, where the gathered women call out cu…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 08:51 AM
2

That's a BS copout. As long as men have to register so should women.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:59 PM
1

Fictionalized child porn is banned almost everywhere. Even when no children were involved in its production. There is a strong argument that it would be better to allow it, because it provides an outlet for pedophiles and makes them less likely to abuse actual children.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 10:25 PM
-3

It was raised by the moderator. The argument for its relevance to men's rights is the ever-increasing age of consent and the ever-weakening burden of proof and the ever-increasing use of strict liability. No longer is a man's honest and reasonable belief that the women was over-age a defense. 200 years ago women were routinely married at 16, but in many states now it is a felony for an adult man to have sex with a 16 year old woman. There are genuine men's rights issues here. The argument for fi…
/r/MensRights12/12/11 10:16 PM
1

The argument for its relevance to men's rights is the ever-increasing age of consent and the ever-weakening burden of proof and the ever-increasing use of strict liability. No longer is a man's honest and reasonable belief that the women was over-age a defense. 200 years ago women were routinely married at 16, but in many states now it is a felony for an adult man to have sex with a 16 year old women. There are genuine men's rights issues here. Real child porn ie pre-pubescent girls or boys - I …
/r/MensRights12/12/11 10:14 PM
1

Still we see no problem with fictionalized accounts of murder, fraud, beatings, and other crimes. Fiction is fiction.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 10:10 PM
1

You are going to woman? Do not forget the whip! This quote is from a fictional character in Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Nietzsche frequently put words into his characters' mouths that he did not necessarily believe himself. Often he would make the strongest argument possible for something he did not believe himself. His female friends used to tease him about that quote and there is a photo of Nietzsche that takes off the quote. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_FTcrP4_W1wU/SnnUTNTsOoI/AAAAAAAAAHo/vku1iSshdh…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 11:04 PM
5

This i a bit of a myth that a high proportion of prostitutes are "trafficked" or sex-slaves. The vast majority are just people who discovered an easy way to make a good living.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 10:46 PM
5

"It's obvious" === "I have no evidence".
/r/MensRights10/12/11 06:25 AM
0

For a woman there is a greater threat of being raped/abducted/murdered. You are lying. Men are far more likely to be murdered than women. In terms of impact being raped is about as bad as being mugged and roughed up. Except that when men are mugged and roughed up they are supposed to just man up.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 06:25 AM
1

Well through the entire book of over 100 appeal cases in the "family" law field here, you could predict the winner from their sex alone in 90% of cases. Example: Post divorce the woman wins the lottery. Alimony not reduced. In another case the man won the lottery post-divorce and had to pay higher alimony. It is painful to read the tortured reasoning involved in reaching the preconceived conclusion that the woman must win.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 05:57 AM
10

But when the mother has a history of mental illness and actions like those of this woman, and the father doesn't, the father will almost always get custody This is just not true. I was just reading an appeal case here where the woman was an active heroin addict and the father was not and the woman got custody.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 09:05 PM
12

In the great tradition of women who think they can read men's minds. Her poor husband.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 05:13 AM
3

Deal with the world as it is. That includes trying to change it, but it does not pretending it is different from how it is. In the present context, that means trying to change the laws that reward paternity fraud of both kinds, as well as taking sensible precautions against it. The two kinds of paternity fraud are: pretending to be on birth control when you are not, and pretending that one man is the father when it is really someone else.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 05:23 AM
2

should That word has caused more trouble than the rest of the English language put together. Deal with the world as it is, not how you want it to be.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 12:20 AM
5

Let me guess. Before this happened you thought she was different. Wrong. The NAWALT delusion. All women worship their own feelings. If they want something it is right. As simple as that. Get a vasectomy and take your chances about a reversal if/when the time comes and get your sperm frozen if you can afford it. Do not tell anyone about your frozen sperm - woman have been known to forge the man's signature to get the sperm. In one recent case the man still had to pay child support when this happe…
/r/MensRights01/12/11 12:12 AM
7

Let me get this right. You are asking for a logical, reasoned argument from SRS? Just wanted to make sure.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 09:08 PM
11

He completely ruled out having children. I don't see why more information was needed. He did not mislead her - he told her he was not going to have children. On the other hand she tried to trap him into children he clearly did not want. But he's the bad guy??? If this is her side of the story, what must the whole truth be?
/r/MensRights30/11/11 02:53 AM
2

Advocacy for the use of child pornography, even as a way to curb pedophilia, is not condoned. Pornographic images/video of children require the abuse of a child to produce, and thus is not acceptable no matter how much it may curb pedophile urges. From this I gather that you are talking about real child porn ie porn produced using children. So it would be in order to advocate legalization of fake child porn (eg produced with overage actors, drawings not from life, text stories etc) as a way to r…
/r/MensRights29/11/11 02:10 AM
8

Plus she has a record for DUI. That is, her drinking has reached the point where she has endangered other people's lives. What does she have to do to have some consequences visited upon her? Would you want this person teaching your children?
/r/MensRights29/11/11 12:47 AM
1

A woman used her mind-reading skills to determine that the man was in the wrong: he literally hit the road without a backward glance or any sort of explanation to that kid That is supposition. We know very little of the circumstances. We do know the wife cheated on her husband and lied to him and to the child about who the father is. According to the judge "Less than a year and a half later, the child's father figure no longer has anything to do with him." So the process of estrangement took abo…
/r/MensRights28/11/11 04:57 AM
-2

have been thinking about getting a 'Family Law' / 'Adoption' lawyer Stop thinking about it. Do it. Now. But don't tell her until he tells you to. You have probably already caused yourself irreparable harm by admitting to things, etc. Don't assume she will stick to the agreement. It will all depend on how she feels at the time. You have no recourse if she changes her mind. She has already shown herself to be unreliable by allowing herself to get pregnant. Your financial and emotional future are o…
/r/MensRights26/11/11 06:46 AM
2

SCUM - founded by a woman who later attempted to murder a man (Andy Warhol). So it's not just idle words.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 06:38 AM
3

My wife worked for the local department of social security 2-3 years ago. A client rang to complain that her "supporting parent benefit" had been cut. My wife explained the reason was she was receiving about $30,000 a year in child support. So she failed the income test for the supporting parent benefit (a government payment). "How am I going to support my child"? "Well there is always the $30,000 in child support". "What are you talking about? That's my spending money!". And she was not the onl…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 08:36 PM
1

That is not the point. Look at their actions. What their actions say is female advantage, with no limit, and with no concern for men whatsoever. One place to start would be to go to the local college and get a copy of the lecture notes for Feminism 101 (now usually called Gender Studies). That should give you some ideas. Have a look at the legislation that comes through with feminist support eg the changes to the burden of proof in sexual assault cases on colleges. Or http://www.avoiceformen.com…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 08:13 AM
3

His life will go on virtually the same. This is just not true. Higher incidence of sexual dysfunction. Higher levels of stress hormones, permanently, from the pain and trauma. Lower levels of female satisfaction. 100 deaths a year in the US alone. http://www.jewsagainstcircumcision.org/
/r/MensRights24/11/11 07:47 AM
1

more fit then more fit thAn another product of the US education system
/r/MensRights24/11/11 07:38 AM
2

On the other hand, the courts in Australia have ruled that a woman who is a drug addict (heroin) is a fit mother, over a father who was not a drug addict. Ditto a woman who worked in an illegal brothel as a prostitute. The fitness test needs to be applied to woman as well.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 10:45 PM
2

BS Except for the cases where the woman took the condom out of the bin and impregnated herself. Verdict: the man must still pay. A woman in the UK forged her ex-husband's signature to get her semen from a sperm bank and got herself pregnant. Verdict: the man must pay. Under-age boy has sex with an adult woman (statutory rape). Verdict: the boy/man must pay. In Germany the man is not allowed to get a paternity test without the woman's consent. So even if he is not the father, the man must pay. Th…
/r/MensRights23/11/11 09:36 AM
3

Except for the cases where the woman took the condom out of the bin and impregnated herself. Verdict: the man must still pay. A woman in the UK forged her ex-husband's signature to get her semen from a sperm bank and got herself pregnant. Verdict: the man must pay. Under-age boy has sex with an adult woman (statutory rape). Verdict: the boy/man must pay. In Germany the man is not allowed to get a paternity test without the woman's consent. So even if he is not the father, the man must pay. The p…
/r/MensRights23/11/11 09:34 AM
27

Many years ago my uncle, who was a doctor, lost his pistol license in a general licence crackdown. He had the pistol as protection because he was the only doctor in a town with no pharmacy. He ran his own pharmacy and people would periodically try to rob him of the drugs. His response was simple: if the police do not trust me to have a pistol, they do not trust me to treat them or their families. So he refused to treat the local police or their families. His license was restored shortly thereaft…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 10:20 PM
1

Studies have shown the circumcised men have lower risks for contracting STIs, particularly HIV. Even these studies conducted by Africa by religious zealots with a prior agenda found that circumcision is about as useful as using a condom only every second or third time you have sex. Not exactly a major win. Which western country has the highest incidence of HIV? Which western country has the highest incidence of circumcision? Yes the USA. Infants are not going to get HIV from unprotected sex. Whe…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 09:55 PM
-1

rehabilitated (by legal definition) All the evidence suggests that pedophiles cannot be rehabilitated. Hinch was right to expose these people.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 08:38 AM
1

MRA's need to drop the Anti-Feminism Why should MRAs stop opposing a movement that is directly threatening them and fighting against their vital interests? You seem to share this naive view that feminism is about equality. Maybe this was briefly true for a couple of years in the 1960s but there is not a shred of truth in that view now.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 10:56 PM
0

We're fighting toward the same goal, equality between the sexes. Clearly you have not actually had a close look at real existing feminism. It has nothing to do with equality, whatever the dictionary says. Feminism is to sex as racism is to race.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 10:54 PM
4

With all due respect this is typical female illogic. You are saying in effect that words matter more than actions. Not they don't because words too often are lies and deceptions. And actions reflect people's true intentions. Watch what feminists do.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 10:51 PM
17

Hmm I don't see it. Women's diseases get more research funding than men's. Do feminist organizations call for equal funding? No. Instead they lobby for more money for research into women's health. Women live longer than men. Do feminist organizations call for action to reduce the death gap? No. Instead the focus is on any minor remaining health areas where women fall behind. More men in prison. Do feminist organizations call for actions to reduce this? No. Instead there are frequent calls for mo…
/r/MensRights20/11/11 10:48 PM
11

"Female circumcisions are an accepted part of Islamic society. Parents shouldn't be punished for it. If you hate female circumcision, there's a better way to go than blaming parents. " Still a valid argument?
/r/MensRights20/11/11 01:03 AM
-1

Her reaction was completely disproportion to the threat, if any. Someone taking a hold of your wrist does not justify massive force. If a woman grabbed your wrist, would that justify breaking her jaw?
/r/MensRights18/11/11 09:52 PM
4

Julian Assange dated two feminists in Sweden. That worked out well didn't it? When they found out he was dating both of them at the same time they suddenly "realized" he had assaulted / raped them.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 09:20 AM
6

Down-votes but no arguments. I smell feminists!
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:14 AM
3

Make me a sandwich then. Darling.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:12 AM
9

I'm not ripped or athletic. Unfortunately, the person that she decided to have an affair with was. Women say they don't want alpha douchebags but their actions say otherwise.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:12 AM
6

A sure sign that feminists are nearby - lots of down-votes but no rational arguments.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:10 AM
9

Yes I have dated feminists and so have lots of friends of mine. Example: a young feminist asked a friend of mine for a semen donation (no sex involved) so she could have a baby. She promised she would never ask for child support, being an independent woman and all. Guess what happened a few years down the track. That's right, he is up for child support including back payments, but he cannot see the child. This phenomenon of women saying they want one thing and actually wanting another is not uni…
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:08 AM
4

However when you observe the actual behavior of women who claim to be feminists, it is nothing like the description in the original article. Watch what they do, not what they say.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 01:59 AM
6

TL;DR - why you should date a delusional person with no self-awareness. Real feminists are nothing like the description in the article. There were no feminists on the Titanic. Women are feminists when it suits them and they are not feminists when it suits them not to be feminists.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 01:58 AM
2

The article is "prison rape in the US". So what is your point?
/r/MensRights14/11/11 08:35 AM
7

At least guys keep feel good parts. No. 30% of the nerve endings in the penis are removed in circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 06:27 AM
14

This would be true but: Possession of material that merely looks like child porn (eg young-looking adults) is treated the same way. Fictionalized child porn is also regarded as child porn. Drawings not made using life models are also regarded as child porn. In none of these cases was an actual child involved but the penalties are severe. My reading of the research is that pedophiles are basically born that way, or in some cases get that way from being abused themselves, and have no choice what t…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 11:29 PM
2

We should look at real existing religions not fictitious religions that exist only in theory. Real religions generally support divorce and assume it's the man's fault. Same for communism. In theory communism is about equality; in practice it was just a different elite that ran the show. Same for feminism: in theory it supports equality; in reality it's a female supremacist and anti-male movement.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 12:30 AM
5

No they don't. What you get in the US and other western countries is Cafeteria Christianity, where people pick the bits they like and ignore the bits they don't like. The bits about obey your husband fall into the "bits they don't like" these days.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 12:23 AM
2

It would not be surprising if there was a bias. Most disputes are resolved in mediation when someone explains to the man how the system is rigged against him. I went through a book of appeal cases in Australia for "Family Law" cases and tabulated the cases won by sex. In almost 90% of cases you could predict who would win from their sex. For the avoidance of doubt, the women won the cases. Two examples: Man wins lottery post divorce settlement. Has to pay wife higher alimony. In another case the…
/r/MensRights07/11/11 01:15 AM
2

I would say it is as accurate as the daily newspapers. And you might learn something that's not in the daily newspapers.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:02 PM
14

Of course gender is just a social construction... except when men decide to be women. After all they aren't real women... or something.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:01 PM
5

Nonetheless, many have been critical of the Islamic world for not condemning terrorism in the name of Islam. Similarly moderate feminists, if there is such a thing, support extremists by their silence.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 10:55 PM
5

http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-deadliest-female-killers.php
/r/MensRights06/11/11 10:53 PM
6

Why can't they go to a sperm bank? Does this really need to be explained? You can't get a sperm bank to pay child support.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 10:17 PM
3

That's right "feminists support equality".
/r/MensRights03/11/11 11:50 PM
1

Vasectomy is not complication free. Apart from obviously causing infertility, which cannot be reliably reversed it seems to contribute to benign prostate hypertrophy. The research is not convincing, however a) I am the only one in my family with a vasectomy and have the worst BPH by a mile b) doctors are not very interested in learning about bad side-effects of their treatments. And you can still get STDs.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 09:06 PM
3

I have a daughter and I observed how women and girls behave as she grew up. Interpersonal conflict among women is manifested by back-stabbing, spreading lies and rumors about the other person, character assassination, and other similar tactics. These are the same tactics feminists use against MRAs. Men tend to be surprised by this because by and large men do not behave in this way. Men are often surprised when women behave like this in relationship conflicts. Again, if they understood how women …
/r/MensRights02/11/11 08:15 PM
2

"feminism, the belief in the social, economic, and political equality of the sexes. That may possibly have been true at once time, but it is not true of real existing feminism now. In any case, your argument is absurd. You are attempting to prove a fact about the real world by appealing to the words in a definition. You can only determine what feminists actually do and believe by observing the behavior of feminists (ie those who call themselves feminists). And their behavior has nothing to do wi…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 08:10 PM
1

I have seen with my own eyes feminists chanting these exact words: "no means no, yes mens yes". And I have experienced situations where a woman said yes and later claimed she did not mean it. And there was no suggestion of coercion. We need to get past infantile slogans and face up to the real issues of human communication.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:00 AM
1

Many downvotes and no arguments. I smell feminists and white knights. If my argument is wrong, explain why.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 06:59 AM
1

Many downvotes but few or no arguments. I smell feminists!
/r/MensRights01/11/11 06:58 AM
1

Not at all. It is just a matter of being sensitive to the whole context of the communication, and not thinking slogans invented by simpletons are useful.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 06:57 AM
0

Dialectic of Sex is also noteworthy because it was the source of the whole idea that "men and women are the same other than conditioning". This was a very influential idea in feminist thought, although it coexists with the idea that women are inherently good and men are inherently bad. How these two ideas can coexist in one system of thought can only be explained by a close examination of the concept of "feminist logic". The sole piece of evidence quoted for the "men/women same" idea was the cas…
/r/MensRights01/11/11 06:53 AM
2

Downvotes but no counter-arguments. I smell feminists here too!
/r/MensRights01/11/11 06:30 AM
4

Downvotes but no counter-arguments. I smell feminists!
/r/MensRights01/11/11 06:30 AM
5

However, the wage gap is a very real problem in many areas. If you are going to make claims like this, how about providing some evidence. In the US, for retail salespersons, women make $0.65 on the dollar compared to men. Female cashiers make $0.92 on the dollar compared to men. For laborers, freight, stockers, etc., women make $0.83 on the dollar compared to men. What corrections were applied for all the factors that would explain those differences, such as hours worked? Unless and until you pr…
/r/MensRights31/10/11 08:32 PM
11

Women are paid less in certain jobs most of the time. Did you control for hours worked, experience, extra qualifications, supervisory responsibilities, willingness to work odd shifts, willingness to work in undesirable locations? There is no evidence you did. And if you did not, your unsourced statistic is completely worthless. People should be paid based on experience, education, and by the work they actually perform. That's not what feminists are demanding. They are demanding women are paid th…
/r/MensRights31/10/11 08:29 PM
3

Read the "The Dialectic of Sex" a foundational feminist tract and very influential. It was explicitly based on Marxism.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 02:27 AM
14

Stop buying things made by men. That's really going to happen!
/r/MensRights31/10/11 02:21 AM
-11

I have had the experience of taking a woman's "no" as the truth and the woman got offended. She said "it was obvious I didn't mean it". If woman want men to believe that "no" means "no" they need to start meaning what they say.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 09:01 AM
-24

No always fucking means no. The "no" said in a coquettish way with body language that says the opposite? The "no" that means "not just yet because I don't want you to think I'm too easy"? The "no" that means "I just need a few minutes to think about it"? It is bizarre that feminists say "no always <expletive deleted> means no" when this simplistic slogan ignores all the subtleties of interpersonal communication. Sometimes "no" occurs in a context where the meaning is "maybe" or "not yet" or "yes…
/r/MensRights29/10/11 08:57 AM
5

The inherent badness of men and goodness / victimhood of women, according to feminists. Dworkin: "Men especially love murder. In art they celebrate it. In life, they commit it." Catherine MacKinnon in Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies, p. 129.. "In a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent." Andrea Dworkin: "Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized ex…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 02:10 AM
2

Language is entirely metaphorical, as you would find out if you learned a foreign language. Read the book. It full of hate and spite towards men, as many feminist books are.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:54 AM
2

It is common for authors to put words into their characters' mouths that are their own views. Have you read the book? The whole thing is a diatribe of hatred against men.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:53 AM
7

They were not incapacitated. He was yelling "stay down" and they kept getting up. It is very easy to pontificate about "reasonable self defence" from an armchair later on. When you are violently attacked by two female thugs, it is just a little more difficult.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 09:48 PM
7

Also worth noting, if you are ever on a jury, a lot of these cases had "confessions". With sufficient sleep deprivation, lies and threats you can get just about anyone to confess to just about anything.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 10:07 PM
-13

"All men are rapists and that's all they are. They rape us with their eyes, their laws, and their codes." Marilyn French
/r/MensRights18/10/11 06:44 AM
3

Actually if you look at the details, the waitress had made a comment about the female customer's weight, saying she "could use a few more pounds". Unfortunately she has suffered from anorexia so the comment was not appreciated. Add to that numerous other service failures, wrong food delivered and refused to take it back, slow service, and one can excuse a comment on the bill.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 02:11 AM
2

Roseanne: you are part of the !%. Now go away.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 01:57 AM
1

And don't forget the origin of modern feminism. It was created so as an ideology to force women into the work force. As the service economy grew, corporations needed more women. Women were also more convenient employees because they tended not to join unions. And because of labor saving devices invented by men, women were now free to work. Gloria Steinem, the leading feminist at the time received CIA funding to help kick things off. She was Henry Kissinger's girlfriend. If you believe feminism i…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:12 PM
6

This sort of thing happens all the time. 1 Men create something 2 Feminists demand a slice of the action I saw this happen a few years with the open source operating system Linux. A feminist showed up at the local Linux User Group annual general meeting and demanded to know why no women were on the board. She was duly elected [she was reasonably good looking], did nothing and left a year later. Recently feminists have been complaining about the lack of female involvement in open source. They are…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:07 PM
1

I'm sorry to tell you but this is already happening.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:50 PM
1

Good material in here but you need to learn to use paragraphs.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:02 AM
1

One reason for wanting a change of name: the divorce rate is about doubled if the woman keeps her previous name. Now sure why but perhaps it indicates a lack of commitment to the relationship.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:43 AM
17

"no, I want Mr Perfect". Actually it's "I want to play around for 10-15 years and then marry Mr Perfect". And if he isn't interested, it's because men are perpetual children who should "man up".
/r/MensRights12/10/11 11:20 PM
2

You can noun any verb you like. In America at least.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 11:02 PM
2

My father had reason to suspect that he was infertile, due to medical treatments he had received. As a matter of basic respect he disclosed this to my mother who then made an informed decision to go ahead with the marriage. So yes I would expect someone to disclose the fact they are or may be infertile, and the reason for that.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:55 PM
5

80-90% of the casualties in conflicts since World War II have been civilians and the majority have been women and children Note the sleazy feminist-"logic" here. First they cut out the soldiers from the count (mostly men of course, and mostly conscripts or joined up due to poverty). Then group women and children together so the percentage sounds larger - a common trick. Of course around half of all children are male. No source is cited for the claim. The figures I have been able to find suggest …
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:41 AM
2

since the draft is constitutionally mandated The draft is permitted by the constitution as it has been held that being forced to die in wars is not "involuntary servitute" forbidden by the 13th amendment. There is no constitutional impediment to drafting women. There are two main reasons why it is not done An army staffed by women would lose wars. Everyone knows this but we are not permitted to say it. Feminists want all the advantages men supposedly have but none of the disadvantages.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:29 AM
9

I can cite a specific example where it was in fact women who maintained the draft. In Australia in 1969 the conservatives ("liberal party") were returned to power and the draft was maintained. More men - and no women - were drafted and sent to die in Vietnam. The conservatives stayed in power because of the female vote. The majority of men voted to throw them out. Women, on the other hand, secure in the knowledge they would not be drafted, voted to keep them in power. Women were also behind othe…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 12:38 AM
19

One married friend, a feminist-studies professor with two degrees from Stanford, surprised me by suggesting that I marry my boyfriend and have children while I was still fertile. "You can always get divorced," she said. "Maybe you'll marry someone you're in love with later." Man oh man. Betas beware - you are now being hunted.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 09:58 AM
6

The problem, for those too retarded to see the obvious, is that pregnancy gives women a way to get out of doing what they are supposed to be paid to do - fight the enemy. The military has rules against making yourself unfit for duty. These rules are rigorously enforced against men. For women, the pussy pass applies - they can get pregnant and go home with no consequences. But don't worry, the remaining men will be required "man up" any carry the burden. http://articles.cnn.com/2009-12-25/world/i…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 12:20 AM
0

The problem, for those too retarded to see the obvious, is that pregnancy gives women a way to get out of doing what they are supposed to be paid to do - fight the enemy. The military has rules against making yourself unfit for duty. These rules are rigorously enforced against men. For women, the pussy pass applies - they can get pregnant and go home with no consequences. But don't worry the remaining men will be required "man up" any carry the burden. http://articles.cnn.com/2009-12-25/world/ir…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 12:19 AM
3

Women are more likely to get someone else to do it eg boyfriend. This is very common. I was just reading the history of the Byzantine Empire and no less than two emperors died this way. If the woman does it herself, she is likely to "realize" that he was an abusive husband and she did it in self defence, or at worst "anticipatory retaliation". So she gets off completely, or is charged with a lesser offence than murder. The woman killed her husband but was not suspected. It is amazing how many wo…
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:03 AM
1

The mother could seek maintenance from the real father. Assuming she knows who he is, and assuming he is "financially stable", as women so nicely put it.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 07:55 AM
-6

No. Israel was not invaded. Israel attacked first. They argued it was "anticipatory retaliation".
/r/MensRights04/10/11 08:26 PM
13

How about just admitting she committed a crime that could have had dire consequences for an innocent man and she needs to be held accountable? Why is there such a double standard. With a man making a false report he would have the book thrown at him. With a woman there is always an excuse. "What man drove her to this?" etc.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 08:54 AM
1

The average time to diagnosis for male breast cancer from first presentation at the doctor to diagnosis is almost 18 months!
/r/MensRights04/10/11 05:24 AM
2

Puberty is the final exam on a parent's parenting. Exactly. Adolescence is when your parenting chickens come home to roost.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 04:11 AM
1

Indeed. Gloria Steinem stated that women are the true victims of war because they have to carry on without their dead or disabled/traumatized men.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 05:41 AM
1

feminist totalitarians Redundancy detected. When feminists arrive the first thing that happens in censorship and thought control.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:25 PM
18

I know a transsexual quite well, a very smart lady. Observing her career and the way people have interacted with her, I find the notion that transsexuals are somehow privileged is totally ridiculous. A lot of people would not even talk to her. Half the people at work would laugh at her behind her back. She was not accepted as a peer by men because she was a woman, but she was a complete outsider among females. The issue between "Feminists" (ie real existing feminists, not the old definition of f…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:23 PM
1

Welcome to the Alice in Wonderland world of feminist "logic".
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:19 PM
14

That used to be called "marriage".
/r/MensRights29/09/11 01:15 AM
0

inb4 dictionary definition of feminist as a person who supports equality. We are talking about real existing feminists here.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 01:14 AM
2

This is simply not true. A lot of men were rejected for health reasons. During WWI and WWII this was a matter of great shame for the men involved, because it was assumed they were malingerers - especially by the all-female "white feather brigade".
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:37 AM
1

It may be useful to be aware of the reason why this announcement is being made at this time. There was supposed to be a full review of the implications of putting women in combat roles, but it has not been completed. Certainly the review findings have not been published. Suddenly the government decides to announce this policy change, which will be implemented over a five year period. Why now? The Labor government is one of the most incompetent, despised, unpopular governments in this country's h…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:33 AM
2

I notice there is no Female requirement for SFDRS. Yet. Before women were admitted to the Army there was no explicit female requirement for the Army as a whole either. That changed as soon as women were admitted. When women are admitted generally one of two things happens: either the overall standard is reduced, or a special standard is created for women only. In any case, even if women did meet the minimum requirement, they would still on average be weaker, slower, less powerful and less agile.…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:28 AM
3

Smith said standards will not be dropped and there would be no quotas introduced for female representation. Sorry this has already happened. Lower fitness standards for women: http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/fitness/ "Army The PFA for Army entry consists of push-ups, sit-ups and a shuttle run. Male requirement: 15 Push-ups... Female requirement: 8 Push-ups..." Here is a lying politician saying something won't happen, and it has already happened.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 10:01 PM
4

Equality of opportunity. Yeah, right. Already the Australian Army has lower fitness standards for women: http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/fitness/ "Army The PFA for Army entry consists of push-ups, sit-ups and a shuttle run. <b>Male</b> requirement: 15 Push-ups, 45 Sit-ups, 7.5 Shuttle run score <b>Female</b> requirement: 8 Push-ups, 45 Sit-ups, 7.5 Shuttle run score For Special Forces Direct Recruiting Scheme (SFDRS) candidates, the PFA standards are: Male requirement: 30 Push-ups, 60 Sit-ups, 10.…
/r/MensRights27/09/11 09:58 PM
4

You just made that up didn't you? As seen in other sub-posts, this is not even wrong.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 10:22 AM
3

gender is not "a social construct which is not tied to one's sex" In other news: The Sun rises in the East. Politicians lie for power and money. Feminism is not about equality.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 10:20 AM
5

Circumcision causes over 100 deaths per year in the US alone http://www.circumstitions.com/death.html Not to mention all the other adverse side-effects.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 09:54 AM
2

This is a terrible article. It completely fails to explain why this is all the Man's Fault (TM).
/r/MensRights21/09/11 11:29 PM
-2

I think we need to make a clear distinction between feminism as defined in the dictionary and real existing feminism. Feminism according to the dictionary is a movement in favor of equality. Real existing feminism is the opposite. It is more like female supremacism. I call it "feminizm". This sort of thing has happened many times in history eg communism was supposed to be about equality but it just replaced one ruling class with another.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 11:26 PM
1

Look at how 'criminals' are treated in this society Well not all criminals. Look at the almost complete lack of accountability for the rampant fraud that led to the current financial crisis.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 11:18 AM
2

you might just hate women When you're losing the argument, shift to a personal attack. It is fact that "feminist" organizations fought against shield laws for the accused, but supported them for the accuser. I have put the word "feminist" in quotes because the dictionary definition of feminism states that feminists support equality, something feminist organizations simply do not do, as in this case.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 11:16 AM
0

Please stop making up stuff. Almost everywhere, the alleged victim's past is off limits.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 11:08 AM
1

To get health care to everyone, you need to fix poverty itself. Evidence? Where I live there is universal health care. For example you never hear here about people being bankrupted due to health care costs, but it is a leading cause in the US. But we have not fixed poverty. That means freer markets (free markets are a panacea for every problem) Time to stop reading Ayn Rand and learn about the real world.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:57 AM
-7

Also women are shorter on average. It is well-established that shorter people earn significantly less. When you take that into account, women earn more than you would expect, given the fields they choose, work hours, willingness to relocate, and work experience.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 08:28 AM
4

hits me on my back I've never seen her hit anyone MFW
/r/MensRights10/09/11 10:10 AM
2

believe me, in scenario 2, if amanda likes bill, she will come back the next day or the next week or whenever and bill will get his handjob and maybe even more because he acted like a GENTLEMAN. You must have some really good weed in you because nothing else will explain this level of delusion.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 01:55 AM
4

It's not his child. He only thought that because she lied. If he wants to save children, he should make a large donation to a relevant charity, not throw himself on this particular bonfire.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 10:27 PM
2

TALK TO A LAWYER Today! In paternity matters time is of the essence. You have potentially ruined your life but there may be hope if you act now.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 10:23 PM
1

Consider this before migrating here: http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/fathers/australia-has-voice/ Having spent considerable time in both the US and Australia I would say that the world-wide view that America is woman-dominated is true, but the difference is one of degree not kind. You also need to overlay the fact that the US justice system is far more punitive than elsewhere, and in most other countries there are strict limits on the reporting of criminal trials - you will always see people ref…
/r/MensRights05/09/11 07:42 AM
7

The victim should be treated as a victim - once it had been established that they are in fact a victim.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 11:01 PM
1

The nature of the injury led the courts to draw the obvious conclusion that it was abuse. Of course, being a woman, she was not prosecuted.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 10:24 AM
1

in practice it's been implemented poorly The only reason you think this is because you misunderstand the purpose of the child support system. It is not to support children, it is to make women better off at the expense of men. Similarly people say that the bank bailouts were implemented poorly and only enriched bankers and did nothing to improve the economy. That's what they were supposed to do you idiot.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 10:21 AM
4

There are some subtleties around this. If the discrimination is only around employment you are correct. However imagine a world where one group of people is discriminated against not just in employment but across the board - as customers, neighbors etc. For example let's say that customers did not like dealing with a person from that group. In such a world, discrimination against that group would be rational for each individual. However it would possibly be harmful for society as a whole - we ar…
/r/MensRights31/08/11 02:05 AM
14

This happened to me but worse. A woman demanded I give up my seat. My reply "I have a better idea - get a feminist to give up her seat".
/r/MensRights26/08/11 06:03 AM
3

It's also very plain reading all this that feminists that they have absolutely zero empathy for men. None at all. Yet they play on the notion that somehow women are nicer, more caring, more empathetic than men.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 12:28 AM
8

As a society we under-estimate child abuse eg circumcision. Circumcision is typically performed without painkillers and is extremely painful and traumatic. A full six months after circumcision boys being immunized cry almost twice as long as those who were not mutilated. Lifelong increases in the stress hormone Cortisol occur in those abused by this barbaric practice.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 09:51 AM
5

I am really tired of people spouting this kind of BS that they learned in liberal studies courses at college. It is not new and insightful; in fact it is a bunch of tired cliches and false to boot.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 09:34 AM
5

However at present an accused is assumed to be guilty, paraded in front of the media and locked up, unless he can prove he is innocent. Eg in the Duke case there was video evidence proving the accuser was a liar. Otherwise they would have been convicted. In the DSK case, the accuser has lied on oath several times before, including about rape. Common reason for false accusations: revenge, alibi, regret as her actions, money.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 10:09 PM
-7

Because it's true?
/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:27 AM
2

Feminism is to sex as racism is to race.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 09:11 AM
11

So when babies get swapped at the hospital and a woman ends up raising another woman's child, that's not a real problem then? After all true motherhood is attending birthdays etc, not just a tiny egg. Well no, when a woman raises the wrong baby all hell breaks loose. As it should. And as it should when a man is deliberately and fraudulently induced to parent another man's child. At the risk of stating the obvious here: another example of the complete and utter lack of compassion that many women …
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:22 AM
3

War is a competitive operation. If you are slower, less agile, can carry less equipment than the other side, you will lose. And women are slower, less agile, and weaker than men. If women are so competitive why did they institute a special and lower standard for women eg fewer push-ups? Girls making up power-point presentations in an air-conditioned office at HQ do not win wars.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 10:50 AM
1

Back in WWII they had all black units, who fought with distinction. Let's try that with women and see how well it goes. No-one wants to try it because everyone knows, if they are honest, what the result would be: a complete disaster.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 10:45 AM
6

That is rubbish. I've been to Germany several times and every large city has memorials to WWII and the extermination campaigns against Jews, Gypsies, mental defectives, homosexuals, atheists, communists etc. It is against the law to promote Naziism, as it should arguably be. If you want to visit countries that are in denial about their past, try Italy and Japan. Mussolini's grand-daughter, a fascist, was a member of parliament. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alessandra_Mussolini You would never kn…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 10:39 AM
5

You must have photoshopped out all the feminists protesting against this appalling discrimination against women!
/r/MensRights13/07/11 10:30 AM
1

Because they are liars. Feminism = feminine supremicism Nothing to do with equality.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 10:38 PM
1

Best quote "If building civilization had been left to women, we would still be living in grass huts".
/r/MensRights02/07/11 10:27 PM
1

No point in continuing with it now. The Americans have succeeded in destroying his political career and his leadership of the IMF, where he was making it difficult for the US. It's not personal, you understand.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 04:38 AM
3

There was no evidence for her claim. Women make false claims all the time. He was never charged with anything.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 11:52 PM
2

There was no evidence for her claim. Women make false claims all the time. He was never charged with anything.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 11:52 PM
0

However the woman was the instigator. She got men to do her dirty work for her - a common pattern. How would you apply this to an all-male situation? A mafia king pin orders some guy to be whacked. A hit-man does the job. Let's say they all get caught. Does the hit-man get the bigger sentence? Of course not. The instigator should get the bigger sentence. In the original case here, they were all involved in a conspiracy to beat up and disfigure this man. The woman was the instigator. She should h…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 11:48 PM
1

However the woman was the instigator. She got men to do her dirty work for her - a common pattern. How would you apply this to an all-male situation? A mafia king pin orders some guy to be whacked. A hit-man does the job. Let's say they all get caught. Does the hit-man get the bigger sentence? Of course not. The instigator should get the bigger sentence. In the original case here, they were all involved in a conspiracy to beat up and disfigure this man. The woman was the instigator. She should h…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 11:48 PM
1

However the woman was the instigator. She got men to do her dirty work for her - a common pattern. How would you apply this to an all-male situation? A mafia king pin orders some guy to be whacked. A hit-man does the job. Let's say they all get caught. Does the hit-man get the bigger sentence? Of course not. The instigator should get the bigger sentence. In the original case here, they were all involved in a conspiracy to beat up and disfigure this man. The woman was the instigator. She should h…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 11:47 PM
3

Can anyone explain why the women got 1/2 the sentences of the men - even though one of the women was the instigator of this outrage? Other than the usual misandrist bias against men?
/r/MensRights29/06/11 11:42 PM
1

Women are a majority of voters.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 10:30 PM
1

Heroin is a very dangerous drug Not really, apart from its illegality. It can cause overdoses. This is mainly a problem because illegality results in variable strength supplies. You can overdose on many things including water - the fatal dose is about 8 quarts. And it can cause constipation. Easily solved with laxatives and fiber. It is addictive. So what? You cannot last more than a week without water, so water is more addictive than heroin. Addiction is only a problem if you cannot get a suppl…
/r/MensRights28/06/11 10:27 PM
6

You may also notice a strong link between feminism and censorship. Look at the censorship on all the feminist boards, going back to newsgroup soc.feminism in the 1990s.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 10:23 PM
2

Studies indicate that allegedly female qualities like empathy, kindness, niceness are situational. Specifically, women are nice when they think someone is watching and they cannot get away with not being nice. So female empathy is much over-rated. It is however true that women have a high degree of political skill. That is a very different thing from being empathetic and nice. Ask almost any man who has been through a divorce (I personally have never been divorced but I have watched many male re…
/r/MensRights28/06/11 10:09 PM
18

Actually this is a classic case where sex-based analysis misses the point. Feminists see everything through a lens of their alleged oppression. The issues here are more about Social Class Race The demise of the family in large swathes of the US community The foisting of subsidized unhealthy food on poor Americans leading to obesity heart disease, diabetes. The absence of a medical care system that provides decent health care for many. People literally die in the US because they cannot afford fai…
/r/MensRights23/06/11 11:38 PM
5

Eye witness identification, of people who they did not already know well, it notoriously unreliable. The prosecutor would know that, but is using eyewitness identification as a linchpin of her argument. Totally dishonest and unethical.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 08:53 PM
17

Most MRAs are not so much concerned about women but about the rules and systems we operate under. That is, the endemic bias against men and in favor of women in our society, and the associated double standards. Women live longer than men but more money is spent researching women's diseases, and there are special women's hospitals. Women get automatic custody of children in a divorce. Draconian child support laws with jailing of those who cannot pay, but no real enforcement of child access. Assum…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 12:50 AM
0

Children aren't entitled to live at the expense of the physical well-being of their parents. So on this basis you would oppose men being put in danger's way by being imprisoned for being unable to pay child support? Such as a man whose partner took semen from his condom and inseminated herself without his consent?
/r/MensRights16/06/11 04:31 AM
1

You also have plenty of choice - condoms, a vasectomy, the classic not sticking your dick in crazy. No, that's a lie. Men who were forced to have sex, boys who were under aged and statutory raped have been held liable for child support. Even a man whose ex-wife stole his sperm from a sperm bank by forging his signature was held liable. Post birth the woman can adopt the child out but the man has no such choice. It is not just about physically carrying the child. Female privilege continues past b…
/r/MensRights16/06/11 04:28 AM
-1

I'm a fervent supporter of slavery. If you think it's morally wrong I can accept that, but I can't accept you imposing your morality on another.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 04:24 AM
14

She didn't just secretly take the sperm. she did so fraudulently - by forging her ex's signature. Of course she hasn't been prosecuted but her ex has to pay full child support. Classic case of female entitlement and the rationalization hamster in full flight: When asked about her actions, his ex-wife said: "I don't believe I have done anything wrong. It was getting later and later for me and I wanted to have a child. "If I had not done it then I would not be blessed with my children. I have no r…
/r/MensRights31/05/11 10:24 PM
2

Yes - if what you were saying was wrong, or your arguments were weak, it wouldn't bother them. It is the fact that your arguments are true and powerful that upsets them. Their only "argument" is to impose censorship. Feminists have a long history of censorship going back to the Internet newsgroup soc.feminism. Originally when it was moderated the agreement was that debate of the merits of feminism would be allowed. However once the though police got moderating power they changed the rules and ba…
/r/MensRights28/05/11 04:58 AM
2

Post marriage, the deadly trifecta Less sex More pounds (average 10 pounds in the year after marriage and other 10 per baby) Cuts hair short This may help The Married Man Sex Life Primer 2011 by Athol Kay
/r/MensRights20/05/11 10:00 PM
1

Maybe... but with women you need to look at the subtext not what was literally said. The response she got was validation of her not having sex with her husband. Perhaps that's what she was after in the first place ("everyone gets what they want out of life"). I suspect her friends picked that up and gave her what she wanted.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 09:54 PM
4

Game is just reverse engineering how females think and what they respond to. If you loathe and despise that, then you are in denial about reality and you loathe and despise reality. Of course people can abuse Game (and women have their own versions of it that they also can abuse) but that is another matter. You can abuse physics, or engineering, or language, but that is no reason to despise those things. Every man needs to understand Game, whether he intends to use it or not... if for no other r…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:00 AM
5

she had no idea how her accusation would ruin a man's life “Mr. Lanigan’s a jerk,” the girl told her friends, according to teachers and trial testimony. “I’m going to make him pay.” She knew exactly what she was doing.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 01:41 AM
0

If rape IS about sex, and I strongly believe that it is, then why would anyone want to hide the fact that it is? It's not a matter of hiding, it is a matter of projection. Women tend to believe that men see sex the same way they do. Women are not that into sex, as shown by low rates of sexual encounters by lesbians, and they tend to use it for power eg getting a man to marry them via the lure of sex; presents; expensive meals etc. They also seek power by pairing up with powerful men - "power is …
/r/MensRights03/05/11 01:30 PM
1

If you anticipate infidelity or divorce as even a minute possibility, you have no business getting married. Half of marriages end in divorce. His parents were divorced and his "brother" appears to be only a half-brother. People have no skill in predicting whether or not they are going to get divorce. So a) they are fairly likely to get divorced and b) they don't have much information at all on the likelihood. He is an idiot for not getting a pre-nup, I think. But there may be stuff I don't know.…
/r/MensRights03/05/11 01:13 PM
-7

And when pictured holding hands hers were on top - another sign of her dominance.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 01:09 PM
1

The child definitely wasn't his and he knew it. This phenomenon of women targeting a beta chump to pay for their child-bearing and then dumping them is very common. One woman I know well told me in as many words this is what she did. The film Blue Valentine should be mandatory viewing for any young man foolish to put himself into the noose that is present-day marriage.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 10:48 AM
11

Ophelia Blake: "'Campus rape ideology holds that inebriation strips women of responsibility for their actions but preserves male responsibility not only for their own actions but for their partners’ as well. Thus do men again become the guardians of female well-being.' "It's a very '50s mentality. Considering that the boy in the scenario the Harvard rape victim described was probably just as drunk as she was, what makes him the rapist and her the victim? The problem with the campus rape mentalit…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 07:52 PM
2

The problem is that in these situations (two people get drunk and have sex) one of the parties is held accountable and the other is not. The woman is deemed not to have consented because she was drunk. No-one says "you got drunk so it's your responsibiity". On the other hand the man is still held fully accountable for his actions, even though he too was drunk. Just another double standard in favor of women.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 07:45 PM
2

I was fine with everything that article said until the bit about "promiscuous sluts." Yes you can't criticize women. God forbid. This fuss was started by feminists, who are complaining on behalf of women who have slept around for years, and are losing their looks. They now want to have some babies and need some beta chump to pay for it until they get bored with him and take his all his money. Clearly it's time for men to "man up". If you have seen the figures on divorce rates based on the number…
/r/MensRights19/03/11 08:29 PM
7

Buy "the rules of the game" and do the tasks in order.
/r/seduction16/03/11 09:02 AM
2

Your whole intent right up front is to put them at unease, to impose upon them, to test their standards and decency. You don't think you're exaggerating at all do you? Maybe it's just about showing you are confident and at ease.
/r/seduction15/03/11 09:07 AM
7

There is another way to look at PZ. If you go through his stories, there is a common theme. The theme is that everyone that he writes about is an idiot, apart from himself. Given that making only Associate Professor at a second-rate institution basically equates to failure in an academic career, it looks like he's making himself look better by putting other people down. Very sad.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 05:38 AM
2

Actually here in Australia there were court cases (full bench of the family court) to the effect that 'merely' being a drug addict or a prostitute was not enough to disqualify a women. However a woman who was both a drug addict and a prostitute did lose custody. So that at least overrides the advantage of being female.
/r/MensRights13/03/11 10:49 PM
4

PUA rule #1: Ignore advice from women.
/r/seduction13/03/11 09:58 PM
1

If I've been sitting talking to a guy and he brushes my arm, or 'accidentally' brushes my leg, I'm more inclined to believe that he's interested, and not in a creepy sort of way. So true!
/r/seduction13/03/11 09:57 PM
2

It is possible that these girls remember the immediate weird feeling Chuck's touch gave them while they are less conscious of the longer lasting effect. As always what girls say they want is not necessarily what they actually respond to. The real question is what results Chuck is getting.
/r/seduction13/03/11 09:49 PM
-1

This story fits an important pattern, which is worth pointing out. Girl makes big statements, will do a man's job, etc etc. Media hype to the nth degree. Grrrl power and all that. Girl not up to the job. Girl runs to daddy for protection. Media forgets about grrrl power and reverts to white knight mode - protect the poor little girl. Case study: Time Magazine cover story of women "sharing the burden" of combat in Iraq. Reality is women on combat pay have combat casualties only 1/10th the rate of…
/r/MensRights05/03/11 12:50 AM
3

I once got a BJ (incl swallowing) in return for taking a girl dancing. This was agreed in advance. $4k seems a lot for a BJ, particularly as others have pointed out she may renege. On the other hand, maybe she has sensed your Alpha-ness and wants some of it, but thinks she needs an excuse in view of your former beta status.
/r/seduction02/03/11 03:11 AM
1

Ahhh the "no true Scotsman" fallacy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman AKA Not All Women/Feminists Are Like That (NAWALT/NAFALT). http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=NAWALT and http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Feminism
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:45 AM
1

This is true but only to the extent that it either A. Causes you do deny your sexuality because you are ashamed of yourself (basically shame at normal male desire), or B. Helps you get over the trauma of adolescent years longing for female touch and not getting it for one reason or another.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 06:45 AM
2

I was abstinent for four years and my sex drive eventually went away. Due to a very high orgasm threshold I went until 17 years old without orgasming other than very rare wet dreams. I can assure you my sex drive did not go away one bit. I sometimes wonder how I got through those years of unbearable yearning and desire. Some other things than M that reduce sex drive: Vasectomy (based on a sample of one). Being very thin and having very low cholesterol eg from a low fat low-calorie diet. (Testost…
/r/MensRights21/02/11 06:43 AM
2

(to original poster) Get a lawyer who specializes in this area. But be aware that as a man the system is utterly rigged against you. The likely outcome is you will pay child support for decades and see the child, if at all, only on the mother's whim. Hope you have lots of money to fight this out. Perhaps you thought NAWALT (not all women are like that), but here is another one who is just like that. An alternative is to learn game and get her back on better terms.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 08:51 AM
-7

men's parental rights are nowhere near as established as women's You haven't been through a divorce or had a child with a woman who then left you have you? If you had you would recognize your comment above as a massive understatement. More generally you argument is an example of "Not All Women Are Like That" (NAWALT). I would suggest your perspective and experience are limited. The point of 'game' and MRAs is not that women are evil. Rather, women think and act in a certain way and you are delus…
/r/MensRights16/02/11 07:45 PM
-1

the older of the pair is seen as the driving force behind the coupling That is just an assumption and not necessarily true. In fact it is often false. I was in that situation. I was 17 and a virgin and the girl was 14 and not a virgin. She initiated the relationship by knocking on my door at college one day. She lied about her age. Her parents knew that she had lied to me and also did not tell me. The main problems with the current laws are There is not sufficient allowance for cases where the g…
/r/MensRights08/02/11 06:27 AM
2

I have read it also. It is a rear-guard attempt to reinstate the discredited views on 1970s feminists. In particular she is trying to reinstate the notion that our minds are solely influenced by environment and that genes do not influence male-female behavior. The original "evidence" for this idea was the case study of David Reimer, a boy who was brought up as a girl after a botched circumcision. Psychologist John Money had trumpeted this as proof that "gender" is just a social construction. Unf…
/r/MensRights03/02/11 03:35 AM
1

Give me a break - "because she is mad about something" - you are saying it is the husband's fault? On the basis of what exactly? So many posts here are about letting her off the hook and not holding her accountable for her actions. The husband is the worst offender with his "later on" divorce. She squandered his hard-earned money and lied to him. Otherwise she is a good wife???
/r/MensRights20/01/11 01:07 PM
2

Some questions for your wife When were you going to get around to telling me? How do I know there is nothing more you haven't told me about? How do I know you are never going to do this again? Anything else have you been lying to me about? How do I know you are not going to keep on lying to me about money and other things? How are you going to pay this off and make this up to me? Eg get a second job, cut your spending. I had a similar situation on a smaller scale a long time ago. Way back when p…
/r/MensRights09/01/11 10:59 AM
3

What exactly would you want to verify that we serve men? Annual report showing number or men given emergency accommodation. Clear statement on web site that services are open to both men and women. Clear acknowledgement on web site that name is misleading and will be changed. as of right now the Shelter is Female only So at some point in the nonexistent future you will be helping men to the same extent as women. You sound like one of Lenin's "useful idiots" to me.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 01:54 AM
5

female infanticide is so popular Did you just make this up? Sex ratios (wikipedia) at birth: 1.12 male(s)/female under 15 years: 1.098 male(s)/female 15–64 years: 1.061 male(s)/female 65 years and over: 0.908 male(s)/female total population: 1.064 male(s)/female (2006 est.) From birth to 15 years the sex ratio moves 3% in women's favor! Males have a 3% survival deficit in infancy. If female infanticide were such as big factor this would not be the case. This survival deficit continues throughout…
/r/MensRights02/01/11 09:43 PM
2

That's the official story. The reality is different.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 12:50 PM
1

Actually with a vasectomy you can actually feel the bumps in the vasa deferentia which shows that the operation actually happened. This may depend on the particular technique used in the operation.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 12:49 AM
2

Your assumptions here, all invalid, are You assume it is possible to reliably determine whether someone is honest or not. In fact studies show most people have no skill in doing this. Not "not very much skill" but no skill. Add to that the fact that your judgment is likely impaired by emotions / being in love at the time you commit to a relationship and you simply cannot make this assessment reliably. You assume that people do not change and so a judgment made at one time will be valid many year…
/r/MensRights22/12/10 12:45 AM
4

Third wave feminism became prominent when the labor force needed women to move into the work force. This was needed because of the move to a service economy, which women are suited, and to drive increased consumption. This is the simplest explanation that fits the facts.
/r/MensRights18/12/10 09:28 AM
1

One reason why women are not prosecuted for falsely accusing men of rape is that it would discourage women from recanting false allegations that might have resulted in a wrongful conviction. The flaw in your argument is that usually there only recant when their story is shown to be a pack of lies anyway. And the sentencing authority can and will take into account the circumstances in which she recanted. A rapid and voluntary withdrawal will be treated leniently, whereas a delayed withdrawal unde…
/r/MensRights18/12/10 08:04 AM
-2

Assume you are a troll, but See: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/
/r/MensRights18/12/10 07:52 AM
3

A lot of people have trouble with this. A jury will find the defendant guilty or not guilty. Guilty means "proven beyond reasonable doubt". Not guilty means the opposite ("not proven-beyond-reasonable-doubt"). The finding is "not guilty" not "innocent". The jury may think the person is probably guilty and still find them not guilty because guilt was not proven beyond reasonable doubt. To convict the accuser of a false report, she must be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt. This means there mus…
/r/MensRights18/12/10 07:50 AM
4

only a minuscule number of rapes are false Do you have evidence or is that just an assumption? There are so many false rape reports that statistical analyses have been done of them. Most common reasons are alibi eg I did not go out and have sex with that guy thus cheating on you, he raped me; revenge - getting back at an ex-boyfriend of someone who rejected you; excuse - I was late to work, or didn't hand in the assignment because I was raped; attention seeking - histrionic / borderline personal…
/r/MensRights18/12/10 07:40 AM
7

Thank you for resisting the temptation to pretend that your upbringing was OK. That requires a lot of courage. A lot of abuse comes from people saying "well it did me no harm", and doing the same thing to their own children. If you can't afford therapists, you might consider working through some of John Bradshaw's books eg Home Coming. Get to the truth about your past and then reinvent a better future.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 09:01 AM
9

What works well is time-outs, having them temporarily lose toys, etc. Then talking to them about it later when they've calmed down. Yes. What works is consequences for things that are actually out of line and conversely encouragement and recognition for achievement. Consequences should be "natural" as far as possible. You spent your pocket money so there is none left for sweets. This is not punishment, just consequences. These sorts of consequences give children a feeling of efficacy - what they…
/r/MensRights30/11/10 08:56 AM
19

Really good post but one typo: I will admit that I had no fucking clue about some of the most basic tenants of divorce laws when I first came here. tenants -> tenets ten·et (tnt) n. An opinion, doctrine, or principle held as being true by a person or especially by an organization. tenant [ˈtɛnənt] n 1. (Law) a person who holds, occupies, or possesses land or property by any kind of right or title, esp from a landlord under a lease 2. a person who has the use of a house, flat, etc., subject to th…
/r/MensRights29/11/10 09:01 AM
-5

Hmmm I am so surprised you have been divorced before, given your intolerant attitude. Placeholder here for links to feminists condemning women for deceiving men about contraception... a far more common situation (I speak from knowledge here).
/r/MensRights29/11/10 03:39 AM
2

By 1975, the children were nine years old, and Dr Money published a paper detailing his observations. The experiment, he said, had been a total success. And the amazing thing is that this "success" was quoted in "The Dialectic of Sex" as proof that men and women are the same, just that they have been raised differently. A complete and utter lie but believed by feminists ever since - when they are not thinking "man bad, woman good". I highly recommend the book about this. "As Nature Made Him: The…
/r/MensRights24/11/10 08:56 AM
3

Actually - A male gynecologist is like a car mechanic who is not a car. A woman gynecologist is like a car mechanic who is a car. You don't have to be a car to repair a car. You don't have to be a woman to repair a woman.
/r/MensRights01/11/10 07:51 PM
23

This research is hotly contested. There are major issues with confounding variables, lack of controls, even lack of verification of the circumcision status (eg "inferred from ethnic group membership"), biased researchers etc. At best, circumcision provides weak protection against men picking up HIV in heterosexual intercourse (ie does not protect woman and does not provide protection in homosexual situations). Weak as in tens of times less effective than condoms. The USA has by far the highest r…
/r/MensRights29/10/10 10:00 AM
0

Down-voting for reciting feminist cliches. The availability of pornography puts orgasm within any man's reach. The availability of hands puts orgasm within any man's reach.
/r/MensRights27/10/10 01:33 AM
2

Down-voting for reciting feminist cliches. The availability of pornography puts orgasm within any man's reach. The availability of hands puts orgasm within any man's reach.
/r/MensRights27/10/10 01:22 AM
22

Don't get ahead of yourself - she has not been sentenced yet. "Under the plea deal, the 33-year-old English Teacher could face between four and 15 years in prison." This for someone who committed hundreds of sex acts with multiple students under her care. Women do have an advantage in these situations, but they need to play their cards right. Express remorse, cry, subtly insinuate it's the boy's fault and he enjoyed it, claim you were sexually abused as a child, don't behave like a weirdo or tra…
/r/MensRights20/10/10 11:51 PM
2

Your sister was repeatedly out of order with your husband and refused to comply with reasonable requests to stop interfering. Your husband was just sticking up for himself and for his nephew. If men went around telling women what to do as your sister did to your husband there would be outrage. It is very instructive to wander around and just listen to how abusively women talk to men and how so many men just take it. When a man sticks up for himself he is perceived as the aggressor even when as i…
/r/MensRights08/10/10 01:41 AM
2

What is it about parenthood that turns people into overbearing control freaks? And yes I speak as someone who has a 23 year old daughter.
/r/MensRights27/09/10 11:27 AM
0

As Camille Paglia put it: "If it had been left to women, we would still be living in grass huts".
/r/MensRights31/08/10 03:01 AM
2

For a start, the divorce rate is about double when the woman does not change her name.
/r/MensRights27/08/10 07:39 AM
6

It's just a matter of the balance of risk. If you run a red light, you probably won't get killed, but you might. The benefit is, you save a few seconds; the cost is you might die. So it doesn't make sense to run a red light. Similarly... You get married. These days, people marry at about 30 years old. You might have a happy marriage. In 20 years your wife will be 50, not good looking, and menopausal. That's the upside. If you get divorced, especially if you have children, you will be financially…
/r/MensRights27/08/10 07:35 AM
5

She played it right. To get off lightly: Be female Cry Express "remorse". After all, words cost nothing. Find a man to blame, even if partly. Look 'nice' and hide your tattoos.
/r/MensRights27/08/10 06:53 AM
4

Risk of prostate cancer. This is not convincingly demonstrated however medicos in my experience are very uninterested in adverse side-effects of treatments... "Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer In 1993, the Journal of the American Medical Association revealed a connection between vasectomy and an increased risk of prostate cancer. Reported studies of 48,000 and 29,000 men who had vasectomies showed 66 percent and 56 percent higher rates of prostate cancer, respectively. The risk increased wi…
/r/MensRights21/07/10 08:58 AM
5

Felix Dennis's famous comment "Don't buy anything that floats, flies or f***ks - rent them instead" is very very true.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 09:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter