TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wawawawawawawaway Archive

View 1 post and 180 comments by wawawawawawawaway on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

lmao right
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 04:43 PM
1

No it’s not. You know nothing about affirmative action. https://www.upstate.edu/diversityinclusion/policies-and-procedures/aa/myth_reality.php God, people who think they understand but don’t understand are the worst kind of people and bring us down as a society. Congratulations on being that kind of person.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 02:01 PM
1

No, it's not. Again, what is your evidence? Seems like you don't have any.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 02:15 PM
0

Affirmative action hires capable people. The propaganda you’ve been fed is just that: propaganda. Give me any evidence that less capable people are hired because of affirmative action, like I have given you evidence why affirmative action is needed. If you can’t do that, then maybe you should reassess your opinion
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 12:52 PM
0

So giving women the same advantages that men already have, got you. Men make up the majority of business ownership. Men make up the majority of most professions not counting pink collar professions. So evening the play field is advantages over men? That is not how advantages work. Advantages would make women the majority of business ownership and women the majority of professions. As for affirmative action also targets equity in race, so really you are concerned about non white men and women hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 02:48 PM
-1

What advantages do feminists advocate for, exactly? The only advantages I hear are advantages already enjoyed by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:27 PM
0

There’s nothing wrong with fertility declining with age. “Most women” is not true as far as I know but I would love to see a source that confirms that “most women” are fertile until their 50s.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 03:25 AM
3

A steady decline is not the same as a rapid decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 09:52 PM
6

The steep decline doesn't happen until 40 on the left graph. On the right graph the decline is at the same pace throughout. "rapid" is not the right word. It's steady.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:43 PM
4

according to the graph the "rapid decline" occurs after 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:18 PM
1

I'm the only one who gave facts. Wrong person.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 05:26 PM
6

I’m not triggered, I’m poking fun. I don’t care what your standards are and I agree with them, actually. But your claim that women in the workforce is what is driving stagnant wages is so comically wrong I had to poke fun. Enjoy your dating life, I’m sure it’s going great 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 02:39 PM
–

Yes, you’re right and everyone else is wrong. Every financial expert EVER will never mention increased women in the workforce because they are all bankrolled by the big banks who benefit from it. Such a paranoid view on life. I work in research and science, and to hear someone express such distrust in research is very sad, but again, this is what happens when low IQ, misogynist men are given the internet, so I expect it and will poke fun at it. Yes, let me trust you instead, someone who can’t ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 02:31 PM
–

So no sources to counter point. Got it. Low IQ indeed. See how I gathered evidence before I made the insult? Maybe try that before making anything a world view of yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 02:19 PM
–

Literally no respectable financial institution or financial expert suggest that, only misogynistic podcasts and YouTube. So I can see exactly the type of person you are. https://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/ https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/so-why-did-us-wages-stagnate-for This is what happens when we give low IQ men the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 02:05 PM
6

Yeah, it isn’t fair to be dismissed by someone who thinks that their insignificant little speck of life possesses all of the rules for every man and woman in the world. Like, get over yourself lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:16 AM
4

I would be careful trying to apply one experience to over a billion people. That isn’t very fair for anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:13 AM
2

What makes you draw that conclusion except your feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:12 AM
8

You think men naturally want to work careers more than women do? Everyone is working because they need money. Women are not special. Men are not special. If the government offered stipends to work less both genders would use it (if it offered similar financial comfort to what the job provides).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:06 AM
1

I see. Well, it’s probably best if you stay out of the gene pool anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 12:57 PM
3

So your options are options you don’t want? Attraction has to be mutual, after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 12:45 PM
3

😂😂😂 that’s why you’re so successful in dating I imagine
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 12:39 PM
3

I have a long term boyfriend who is obsessed with me but sure, keep living in your delusion because a you know deep inside a woman would never want to love someone with such an ugly mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 12:24 PM
3

lmao are the men who can’t stand our guts in the room right now? I have a masters degree and make a good salary. I’ve never been deprived of men wanting me. And I’ve never wished I was kept barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen instead. 54% of women in America are in the workforce. 64% of men are in the workforce. Women who work are not an exception to the rule; it IS the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 12:12 PM
1

Look up lateralization in male brains. I’m not your mommy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:23 PM
1

I have read additional research in neuroscience that has said the same thing. You have not one scientific article to prove me incorrect. The onus is on you now. But you don’t have shit 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:06 PM
1

lmao science doesn’t prove anything, but it’s the closest thing we got. So you rather trust your feels that suggestions formed by research? You sound like a smart one 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:00 PM
1

Men are the logical gender but women are the rational gender. Rationality requires emotion and logic. Only through both do people make good decisions. This is suggested by neuroscience. https://www.philonomist.com/en/interview/without-emotions-you-always-make-wrong-decisions
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:04 PM
2

We should not apply rules to what have too many variables to remain constant. That means there is not a rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 09:17 PM
2

Exceptions to the rules mean that there are no rules. Only majorities and minorities.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 05:25 PM
1

How does this have anything to do with the OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 11:53 PM
1

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 11:22 PM
1

No. Where do I say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:19 AM
1

Ok, well I’ve heard it and I’m a woman. Experiences may vary.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:08 PM
1

Yes, I agree, the conditions of each relationship is far too variable to create such a generalized statement of “truth”. I think they mean THEY are willing to settle far more than they see women settling. Which is not unconditional.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:41 PM
1

True. My problem is that many tend to express it as “men love unconditionally and women love conditionally” even though that’s not true. We should look at both sexes as opportunistic, and then discuss their distinctions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:37 PM
1

Why? Both are opportunistic. Both are conditional. Men and women have conditional love.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:30 PM
1

Lmao more like “why aren’t we having sex I’m horny because I’m attracted to you (opportunist)” and women saying, “but you aren’t showing me you love me (opportunist)” both sides are being opportunist, just different types of opportunist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:25 PM
1

I think trying to make them SO different plays a part of the mess many men have found themselves in. They are different- but both are opportunistic and both should be described as such, or you will create more resentment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:18 PM
2

Women’s love is just as opportunistic as man’s- the opportunities are just different.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:10 PM
1

This is true. And why the Red Pill’s “truth” is laughable. Anyone can cherry pick a study and that’s exactly the “proof” I see, if I even get a study to substantiate their claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:45 PM
1

This is true. And why the Red Pill’s “truth” is laughable. Anyone can cherry pick a study and that’s exactly the “proof” I see, if I even get a study to substantiate their claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:43 PM
1

Men fall in lust easier than women. And I think men too often confuse lust with love.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 12:50 PM
1

Just because women are attracted to it doesn’t mean they’ll only go for it. The amount of non powerful men I see in relationships is…. A lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 12:01 PM
2

Yes, I agree, men’s love is conditional.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:48 AM
1

No one has done that. You’re going completely off of vibes and won’t admit it. Vibes is such a foolish way to create a worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:31 AM
3

some men do. Some men also don’t. That’s why it’s pointless to put billions of people into boxes and say we all want this and we all want that when such things are impossible to quantify. Get it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:21 AM
2

What proves hypergamy?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:16 AM
3

Charisma, style, and humor are all qualities that men want in women as well, generally speaking. This is only based on my personal experience but I have attracted men because I have all that you described.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:14 AM
1

Anecdotal evidence is not “clear evidence”.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:09 AM
–

That’s a bold statement to make with nothing to back you up but “vibes”
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:06 AM
2

Yeah I wasn’t really paying attention, sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:07 AM
–

There are a lot more men in relationships than 1%
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:41 AM
2

If you believe that men don’t love more unconditionally why are we having this conversation? That’s what this thread is about. I was under the impression that is what you were defending. Now I’m not sure what your point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:36 AM
3

While that might be true, it does not mean that women are more conditional than men. It could mean they just have different conditions than men, generally speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:32 AM
2

Why do you think they are settling instead of having their conditions met? Do you think that maybe they are losing some of the conditions that they initially had? Which is why suddenly the wife isn’t happy? People get locked into marriages with personality changes all the time. That’s not men being unconditional, that’s men losing past things they had and make them not meeting the woman’s conditions. Maybe the wife still had all the conditions met when he was not meeting them anymore. This is ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:15 AM
1

Why do you think they are settling instead of having their conditions met? Do you think that maybe they are losing some of the conditions that they initially had? Which is why suddenly the wife isn’t happy? People get locked into marriages with personality changes all the time. That’s not men being unconditional, that’s men losing past things they had and make them not meeting the woman’s conditions. Maybe the wife still had all the conditions met when he was not meeting them anymore. This is ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:14 AM
2

You think that your anecdote is more convincing? You have no idea how women feel, and what they don’t feel. Why do you think they experience it differently? The stereotype is “happy wife happy life”. Men think that they sacrifice more for the woman, but they just have different conditions. Those conditions even expand out from the woman themselves. It may seem like they have less conditions, but they have conditions in different ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:51 AM
1

Lmao, why should I debate someone who’s doing it badly?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:46 AM
1

Women are no more wonderful than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:37 AM
1

Women move on faster when they made the decision. Also, I can’t believe you’re using a stereotype as proof of a true fact of life for everyone always
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:36 AM
3

Love is not a feeling. Love is a chemical reaction to enough conditions being met.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:24 AM
6

What are women’s conditions? What are men’s conditions?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:22 AM
8

You say I have too much faith in social science but you cite social science as a source? Are you being for real right now? Requiring a lot of data for conclusions isn’t a social science requirement, it’s a requirement for all science. It is the most rational way to look at the world. So, since collecting enough data to draw any conclusions on social dynamics is so difficult, the most rational conclusion is “I don’t know”. There is a reason Plato said the wisest person in the world is the person …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 11:15 PM
2

Also, just one doesn’t count because of obvious cherry picking conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 11:11 PM
7

Okay. That’s why I reiterate this is just my personal observation and I don’t consider my personal observation fact
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 11:07 PM
3

You say that but cite no sources. Literature isn’t a source. If it was than unicorns and dragons would be real, too. And psychology isn’t a source except explicit studies with appropriate sample sizes. Biology isn’t a source without explicit studies and appropriate sample sizes. Do you have any of that? Watching other people say “from studies” but doesn’t cite the studies don’t say count.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 11:06 PM
8

I haven’t experienced any women saying this
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 11:01 PM
14

Yeah this is for all of those emotional immature men who think they’re something special and smart.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:59 PM
4

Hypothesized based on what exactly? Personal observations? Anecdotes?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:57 PM
7

True
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:43 PM
2

Ok, I accept that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:39 PM
2

Less attractive than others for sure
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:38 PM
1

In the past I’ve forgiven some physical features because of great personalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:35 PM
4

Unconditional love loves no matter what. Not tolerating behavior and leaving is not unconditional love. If it was unconditional love, you would stay.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:34 PM
3

I’m a woman, and yes most probably do, but not much as men
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:31 PM
8

Lmao conditional tolerance is conditional love
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:27 PM
7

Dude I’m just going off my anecdotal evidence that is totally not valid. But I see ugly guys with beautiful girls so something else is going on
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:24 PM
4

Did you read the wall of text? I’m responding to those who think men loves unconditionally and women love conditionally, or how you said “putting an entire population on earth into 2 homogeneous buckets”. I say both love for different reasons, and none of them are unconditional reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:09 PM
2

Yes because a sample size of 50 is enough to make conclusions of billions. The amount of confounding variables makes analysis inconclusive
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:00 PM
3

You have no valid proof to speak with such certainty.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 05:34 PM
1

This is wild and pure conjecture. I’m sorry you think of women so lowly and never experienced love.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 05:09 PM
1

In general: Because women’s love happens to be significantly more conditioned then men’s This is pure conjecture.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 11:07 AM
1

No one loves adults unconditionally. My boyfriend wouldn’t date me if I wasn’t physically attractive to him, just as I wouldn’t date him if I wasn’t physically attractive to him. A man wouldn’t give his life for someone who doesn’t give him something in some way. Conditional love is not gendered. I don’t know why it keeps being brought up like it’s a woman-only feature.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:41 PM
1

Everything you say is conjuncture.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:45 PM
3

You don’t need RP to “get it” and there is no “official script”.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:07 PM
1

you keep thinking that, kid
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:29 AM
–

conditional is not the same as transactional. Honestly, someone who can't even see the difference is not worth continuing a conversation with.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:15 AM
–

Yet you're the only one making logical fallacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:08 AM
–

Can't elaborate so goes for an ad hominem attack. Must be a man. An emotional one at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:02 AM
–

>There is nothing misogynistic about knowing women want men better than them (either in looks/status/money/intelligence), and knowing they settle down once their biological clock is ticking (if they're dating no one). That's not how women work. We are not a monolith. It is deeply misogynistic to characterize all women with the same vapidness as what you describe. You see love as transactional. That is not healthy. You try to apply logic to what is inherently illogical: sexual desire. Getting fit…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:42 AM
–

You can learn to be calm with stoicism, mindfulness, therapy, etc. but you choose misogynist drivel that tells the correct time twice a day and is nonsense in between.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:26 AM
–

It’s rage bait. It doesn’t have to work or be true to be successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:19 AM
–

If interacting with women did all the work then why are there so many men who don’t need the red pill to get into relationships and marriages? This line of thinking makes it really hard to not believe you live in a basement.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:16 AM
5

Dating apps are not accurate data on real world relationship standards lmao get off the internet
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:33 PM
7

69% of Americans are in a relationship. That’s not congruent with women only wanting “6 in dick, 6 foot, 6 figure” men, since that is less than 1% of the male population. Touch grass dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:25 PM
10

Dating coaches have done the same for men, so your point is? Delusion isn’t a gendered issue
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 12:42 PM
1

Oh, I must of misread. But it doesn’t negate that men in their forties are expired goods to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 07:13 PM
–

You’re moving goalposts. First it was 20s, now it’s late 20s. A 21 year old is a lot different than a 28 year old. I don’t think a 28 year old has daddy issues, but a 21 year old would, probably. I love how you’re defending yourself. I keep making insults because you keep getting emotional with them. You’re obviously insecure. Good luck out there 🫡
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 06:56 PM
–

Yeah it wouldn’t let me respond to that thread. You got one 20 something year old with daddy issues to date you and now you think all of them would. Keep living in la la land, bald grandpa
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 06:44 PM
–

Also, why would I be jealous of an ugly 40 something year old man who has 20 something woman who is fucking him because he has money? Like good job, you’re paying for sex 🫡 I’ll stick with my 35-year old boyfriend who is both extremely hot and loves me deeply. And has a full head of hair 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 05:55 PM
1

Okay? Lmao statistical analysis beats anecdotes but go off.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 05:37 PM
0

I don’t see a problem there. If they are just as qualified there should be a quota. I work at a very diverse workplace and we’re the best running center in our area, which follows the research that diverse workplaces outperform homogenous workplaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:01 PM
3

https://harver.com/blog/hiring-biases/ https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/why-diversity-matters
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 11:54 PM
-1

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 11:13 PM
11

DEI doesn’t let women and men have the same standards- DEI was put in place to mitigate against the subconscious biases that have been proven time and time again in research, where a hiring manager will choose the candidate that looks or acts like them the most, rather than the most qualified. In many cases, men who were under qualified would get hired because the hiring manager was also white and male, instead of better qualified women, poc men, etc. The DEI propaganda has rotted your brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 10:48 PM
3

Do you have any data on this? Anecdotes are a logical fallacy, and are not valid in logical debates. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_anecdote
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 01:17 AM
1

That’s funny, I’m 34 female and set my age range to 28-37 max. Men over 40 are gross looking, generally speaking. We don’t want you either.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 12:16 AM
1

This conversation has taken such a different turn from what we were originally talking about so I’m just going to leave this here in the hopes you understand because just because you see it on Reddit, YouTube, and a few real life experiences does not mean that you can generalize it across a whole demographic of human beings and think less of them because of it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence Where only one or a few anecdotes are presented, there is a chance that they may be u…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 01:16 PM
1

Yeah, sorry about that, shit people are shit. Don’t get sucked in thinking all women are shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 05:06 AM
1

Yeah, feminist that have been cherry picked to make you mad. I’ve never met a feminist IRL who hates men. I’m a feminist. Some people are shit who say shit things, doesn’t mean all people are shit. “Trends” that you see in your personal life are not reflections of how everybody is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 05:00 AM
1

Um, I see criticisms of women all the time. Literally all the time. You don’t see it because your algorithm shows you rage bait of man hatred, when they try to show me rage bait of women hatred. I’m dealing with the same thing but I don’t think the majority of men want to take away my right of education, or how I’m just a wet hole.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 04:49 AM
1

I don’t think men are shit. I love all the men is my life. So when you sound so focused on how shit women it makes it sound like you really don’t like women. I’ve never thought about ways men are shit before. Sounds like a waste of energy and focus. But you do you!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 04:41 AM
1

Yeah, that’s anecdotal evidence. I hear a lot of shit men do. Do I think most men are shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 04:35 AM
1

Reddit posts and manosphere venting and ranting isn’t actual data lol shit people are shit. Like I said, I see a lot of men saying dumb things on the internet, does that mean I have data that the majority of men are dumb??? Come on. Get real!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 04:26 AM
1

Cherry picking at its finest.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 04:18 AM
1

Not so in practice??? I just gave you a theory, you have to give me evidence that the theory is incorrect!!! Where is your evidence?? You have none!!! All the evidence that we have, the fact that women score higher on emotional intelligence, should lead you to learn more to actual data instead of rage bait!!! You have no respect for actual data.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 04:16 AM
1

Oh no, I think I realize what’s going on here. You think that “hold yourself accountable” is a logical skill. My dude, that is an emotional intelligence skill, which is not based in logic. The IQ test does not measure emotional intelligence, but women are regularly scored higher than men: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_emotional_intelligence So, since “holding yourself accountable” is an emotional intelligence skill, theoretically, women would be better at it than men. I’d re…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 04:08 AM
1

I know they average out to be 100. You aren’t understanding me, and that’s okay. And I’m sorry but I don’t see your point that there being more male geniuses than female geniuses have anything to do with men having more accountability than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 03:53 AM
1

That may be true but that means that there are more average and above average IQs in women than there are idiot women. Thus, there’s more intelligent women than intelligent men, since a higher amount of the male population is in the average and below average. Thus, the majority men believe they are like this minority of men, when in actuality there are more women in the world that are of higher intelligence. The chances of you being average or below average IQ is much higher than the chances of …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 03:40 AM
1

Not saying women can’t, but there’s a consistent trend of women complaining that all guys are terrible and wondering where all the good guys are at, while many fall for the bad boy rather than the good guy, and that generally men seem to take accountability more than women. Yeah, rage bait is a hell of a drug. I see a lot of men saying dumb things, do I think all men are dumb? You don’t have to prove “don’t stick your dick in crazy” to men because men have sense enough and are accountable enough…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 03:11 AM
1

Oh and you would have to do the same with 100,000 women to prove the opposite is true, that women can’t pick the right guy because they just don’t take accountability for themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 01:37 AM
1

For me to believe you, it would require a sample size of at least 100,000 men, where you would have to show that the vast majority (80% of the sample size) not only know of “don’t stick your dick in crazy” but follow it and never stick their dick in “crazy”. That would require possibly decades of longitudinal data that gets personality assessments of every woman these 100,000 men date, their psychological history, their criminal history, the overall quality of their relationship, and the reasons…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 01:29 AM
1

It wouldn’t be “trivially easy” to prove you wrong, because you’re talking about hundreds of millions of women just in the United States, billions in the world. Just as it wouldn’t be “trivally easy” for you to prove yourself right. That’s why I don’t have an opinion, because social patterns are nearly impossible to discern and I don’t claim to know anything without clear, concrete data, unlike you. I follow the data, you follow your feels. We are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 01:05 AM
1

I’m sorry you feel that way. Because that’s all that’s really happening here: you feel like things are a certain way. You will never know the corrective mechanisms that happen within and between women because you are not one. And yet you act as if you’re so sure. Because you feel as though it is true. For someone who is so passionate about logic, that is such an emotional response. The logical thing to do is accept that you will never fully understand or comprehend what is happening and move on.…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:11 AM
1

Maybe you should test the effectiveness of “don’t stick your dick in crazy” before you question the effectiveness of ours.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 11:04 PM
1

Respectfully, as a man, how would you know? Just because you don’t know of any doesn’t mean there aren’t any. What is comical is that you seem to think because just because we don’t have a catchy saying must mean we don’t have ways of warning each other of crazy men. Women don’t need catchy sayings because we have strong support system made of other women who warn each other of toxic traits we see in crazy men. That’s a part of female friendship. Hell, we even have subreddits and Facebook groups…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 10:29 PM
1

Anecdotal evidence is not reliable data for any assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 09:38 PM
1

That’s exactly what I’m saying with this: You can only apply logic to long term relationships after the sexual attraction threshold, the illogical part of relationships, is met. To break it down to more of your reading comprehension level, once you decide you are sexually attracted to someone and they are sexually attracted to you, you can assess whether it would be a good long term thing. You are assuming A LOT that that assessment isn’t happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 09:28 PM
1

What? I never said that logic can’t ever be applied to relationships. I literally say that you do apply logic to relationships: You can only apply logic to long term relationships after the sexual attraction threshold, the illogical part of relationships, is met. So I have no idea what you’re talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 09:19 PM
1

Laws are based on rationality, which includes both emotions and logic. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15134841/ Research shows that when people damage the part of their brain that processes emotions, their ability to make decisions is greatly damaged and lead to significant impairment. Emotions are incredibly important for rational decision making, as the research shows. This false dichotomy you have of logic and emotion is just plain wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 08:32 PM
1

You can only apply logic to long term relationships after the sexual attraction threshold, the illogical part of relationships, is met. You are trying to apply logic to both parts. That is not possible. False equivalence. The illogical, consensual sexual actions of two adults and the illogical and illegal action of rape are two very, very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 08:10 PM
1

Ah, I see what you’re doing. You’re trying to apply logic to sex. There is no logic when it comes to sexual selection and reproduction. There is no way for there to be a logical fallacy in sex because sex isn’t logical.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 07:47 PM
1

Men get told that what they find sexually attractive in women is sexist and superficial People who say this are clueless about how the world works. So when you say this, it makes you sound clueless as well. I don’t make the rules, I’m just pointing out the double standard There is no double standard. The vast majority of people do not berate men for having physical preferences in women. The whole advertising industry is BUILT on the sexual preferences of men. If you think that you are chronicall…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 12:36 PM
1

You actually believe that 100% of women are only attracted to men with the mythical 666? THAT is the statistic you’ve pulled out of your ass. If a woman is only sexually attracted to someone who is over 6 feet and has a 6+ inch dick, then yes, it is correlated with happy relationships. Not all women need that to be sexually attracted to someone. The point is that if someone has standards, let them have standards, and worry about your own life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 03:31 AM
1

Hmm and yet 51.8% of men in America are married (that stat doesn’t even include those in relationships). Your math ain’t mathing. Obviously not only 6 ft tall men and 6 inches + are getting married and are in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 03:22 AM
1

Nice job pulling that statistic completely out of your ass
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 03:11 AM
0

you’re assuming a lot about me This is rich coming from a guy who is assuming a lot about women
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 01:57 AM
1

Superficial reasons? Do you mean physical reasons that make us sexually attracted to someone? The reason we have sex with someone? Sex, the literal foundation of healthy, romantic relationships? Physical attraction is a directly correlated with happy marriages and happy relationships. 6 feet and 6 inches+ is a direct correlation of good, happy sex and happy relationships, given the dude also has a good personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 12:13 AM
1

Lmao guess how much anyone cares about your loser thoughts and yet here you are still spewing them
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:30 PM
1

lol as a woman guess who I gave the time of day to: men who made sex amazing for me or men who only cared about their own pleasure. Only one kind was boyfriend material. The other I would dump very quickly. I feel sorry for any women in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:03 PM
1

lol speak for yourself. I look at the first person I had sex with with disgust now. The first is rarely the best. I’m getting the best in my 30s now
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:59 PM
1

I read it and my point stands. Princess Diana was married off because of her bloodline. She wasn’t some waitress at a bar. Using her as an example does not help your point, only solidifies the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 06:26 PM
–

Princess Diana’s family was British nobility dumbass 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 07:31 PM
2

You must be very young/very immature if you think hot guys are the only ones getting healthy, fulfilling relationships. Online dating behavior is not real world behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 04:12 PM
1

It's not meant to be a debate tactic. If we want to talk about pitiful debate tactics, it would be your argument that it is an "easily observable reality" when it very much is not the case. Confirmation bias, anyone? But I think you're just scared, so you latch on to these ideas and confirm your biases by seeing what you want to see. You haven't made one "debatable" point this whole time. And that's because you don't have a point, other than deflecting all responsibility on women and THEIR delus…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 06:57 PM
1

That’s good, because it seems exhausting.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 06:38 PM
1

*source needed for these women and their mindset. Rage bait is not a source. The foundation for your argument is a stereotype. You are upset because of these caricatures of women made specifically to upset you. It is not a good faith argument because it has no basis in reality other than tropes you find on the internet. I’m still confused why you care so much about these hypothetical women who will “settle” in their 30s. But I’m not sure you know, either. I think it’s because you must feel like …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 04:51 PM
1

There’s a point when the opinions and arguing viewpoints have some basis in reality and are not caricatures created in the heads of chronically online boys that are projecting their fear of being alone on hypothetical women. There is nothing helpful about your insistence in making sure women aren’t “delusional”.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:47 PM
3

Why do you care so much about these women? You keep saying “fine enough” while writing walls of texts of these delusions. It obviously bothers you, and I hope you realize it shouldn’t bother you. Don’t concern yourself with these kind of people. It isn’t healthy <3
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:56 AM
2

Ok, so what’s the point of you pointing it out? How is it useful to anyone, when you yourself say you wouldn’t wish the alternative on others? Just let it be, dude. Chill.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:29 AM
3

You must be so young. You think that anything is better than being alone. I assure you, it is not. I am happier alone than I am with someone who didn’t share my values, wanted children when I didn’t, and wanted many other things that I didn’t want. That’s what I mean by not settling. You boil everything down to “hotness” and “sex” like that’s the only reason people need companionship. You know nothing of love, connection, and togetherness. That’s really, really sad. Any relationship less than th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 08:14 PM
4

So they would rather have a woman who is settling for them because “she can’t get any better”? That’s really, really sad, unhealthy, and will lead to a miserable life for both parties and god forbid children. I have no sympathy for men who are so selfish they’d rather have reluctant pussy than creating a happy, healthy life for themselves that doesn’t involve anyone “settling” for anything. I broke up with my boyfriend after I realized I was settling for him. Best decision of my life, cannot ima…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 03:06 PM
2

I’m not missing the point. To each their own. I’m not sure why you’re so concerned about this hypothetical woman and her inevitable singlehood?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 12:02 AM
2

lol, I’m single because I have standards. Because it takes much more than looks and numbers to make a fulfilling, committed life with a partner. You think you want a relationship, but you just want a pretty girl to fuck. Those things are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 11:35 PM
2

I had 1650 and am still single, just like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 10:33 PM
3

Biology is actually detrimental to happiness and contentment. I will link you further reading on stress and other biological reactions that will kill us if we don’t make a conscious effort to contain them if you’re interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 09:50 PM
2

I ended up with 1650 likes on bumble in 3 days. Didn’t have sex with any of them. Having a ton of options mean nothing to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 09:48 PM
14

That can be all fine and true and it’s the woman’s personal problem if she can’t find a man to date. BUT women lowering their standards to date guys they aren’t interested in is not the answer, and will only make dating and marriage worse for everyone involved. It’s absurd to argue anything differently. Those women (and men, because men delusion is just as prevalent) will end up alone and honestly probably will be happier for it lol because again, dating and marrying someone you’re not 100% in l…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 09:31 PM
1

Two, you literally threatened an opinion (not a threat or even a desire, but a forecasting opinion) of mine with reporting to an authority like the FBI in another thread, so I don’t know how you can say here that no one is stopping me from doing or saying anything. You are speaking of destruction. You are speaking of "fight". Your post history is very telling. People are getting married later in life. Single and childless at 30 isn't the concern it used to be. Women have children into their 40s.…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 03:05 AM
1

The people who say, “end all men” are deranged too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 01:45 AM
1

I’m really trying to understand what you’re saying but you sound deranged. That isn’t meant to be an ad hominem, you genuinely do. No one is stopping you from doing or saying anything. Most of us just don’t want to be in a relationship and most of us are fine with being alone if that’s what it results in. However, since the vast majority of men do have relationships, society is not going to fall. You really need to start enjoying life, you only have one. You have become porn sick and isolated. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 01:40 AM
1

You still haven’t told me what female privilege is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 12:36 AM
1

What is the female privilege? To not fuck ugly men? You have the freedom to not fuck ugly women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 12:20 AM
0

I think I need to report this one to the FBI.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:34 PM
1

You don’t have to believe it. 35% of men have never married, as of the latest sample. And that includes gay men. Also, some men do not want to marry. So the amount of men who presumably have a problem (even though there may be many who exist in that number who don’t have a problem with it). When your “justice” and “respect” necessitates the loss of freedom for human beings, it doesn’t need to be tolerated or respected.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:24 PM
1

The most common age gap is WITHIN two years meaning most people marry within their age range but “younger women are superior” lolololol 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 10:00 PM
0

lol the most common age gap is WITHIN 2 years. People tend to marry people their own age.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 07:43 PM
1

You are acting like the majority of men don’t reproduce. The majority do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 06:55 PM
1

lol what? We weren’t married and didn’t have kids 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 01:18 PM
1

Based on my one comment? LOL okay 👍 the self delusion is so real in you, so thanks for the laugh. This was fun. I love seeing men fumble about like you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:37 PM
1

There we go, again with the lack of self awareness and an inability to take the heat from a fire you started yourself. It’s definitely interesting you assume to know so much about men with opinions you don’t like. Yeah, isn’t it interesting when we assume we know so much about people? Absolutely rich coming from the man who said all I wanted was a Chad. You know nothing about me. So let me get this straight, I shouldn’t make assumptions about you, but you can make assumptions about me? Not only …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:31 PM
1

It doesn’t hurt my feelings, it gives me the go ahead to insult you right back. The material is plentiful for anyone who believes in the mythical Chad. Just say you can’t fuck, dude. No need to be using mythical creatures to sooth your dismay.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:21 PM
1

LOL that lack of self awareness is incredible. You insulted me first, dude. If you can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen. But I guess I shouldn’t expect an imbecile to understand what that means.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:18 PM
1

I’m not triggered, I love calling out an imbecile when I see one. Ever heard of the word nuance? A lack of it is a sure sign of stupidity. And boy, do you lack nuance. Have fun failing at everything you do in life 😘
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:12 PM
1

Yeah sure, chronically online basement dweller. I’m sure you love mommy wiping your ass while you play video games. Let’s ignore all the rational reasons I had for leaving him. Reasons you have never heard nor experienced. Do you know how dumb you sound when you paint a broad stroke over individual’s lives? You must have an IQ of 80. That’s the only way you can see sense in that kind of worldview. They really should have parental controls for the intellectually challenged on Reddit so I wouldn’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:03 PM
1

lol, whatever makes you sleep at night buddy. Can’t imagine how being so delusional improves your quality of life but you do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 06:38 PM
3

I had a “nice, hard-working and thinks of the future” man. Didn’t make me happy, so I left him. I feel much better now. That’s not all there is to a good relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 01:17 AM
2

LOL ok dude
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 06:35 PM
4

Ah yes, a life we should all be striving to live
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 03:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter