TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

weeglos Archive

View 5 posts and 112 comments by weeglos on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

There are lots of formerly 'technical' terms that are now considered quite racist.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 05:36 PM
24

Who was the Barbie movie's target audience? Who is the MCU target audience?
/r/MensRights14/11/23 09:07 PM
9

How do you know you're dating a communist? Red flags everywhere.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 05:30 PM
13

Yes but coaching little league right now. Get it later for you. Here you go. To support her contention that many more youngsters have been sexually mistreated by school employees than by priests, Ms. Shakeshaft pointed to research conducted for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and released late last month. That study found that from 1950 to 2002, 10,667 people made allegations that priests or deacons had sexually abused them as minors. (“Report Tallies Alleged Sexual Abuse by Priests,” th…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 02:58 PM
27

Kids are more likely to be molested in a public school than a church. edit: source.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 02:07 PM
22

Close. High school.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 05:15 PM
14

At least you had partitions. We had a 4' mini wall between stalls and no door. If you needed to take a dump you waited until during class and asked to be excused.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 03:34 PM
11

If you need to take payments in cash, get one of these and do the paperwork every time. That way there's a paper trail.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 04:38 PM
22

We haven't had a single play date in two years. It's just him and me.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 10:48 PM
26

Who has time for support groups? But we are doing well. We'll get by.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 09:30 PM
227

As a widowed single dad, I get it. I get notes home to 'Mrs Weeglos' all the time, I get letters from the pediatrician the same way. I get crazy looks at the park when my kid is running around and I'm by myself, on my phone or something. Nobody ever wants to talk to me - it's like I have leprosy or something.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 08:47 PM
1

I wonder if she feels too guilty for cheating and can't live with herself with a guy who was completely faithful, so she's running away thinking she's running from her guilt when she's just compounding it by leaving.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 03:27 PM
2

Two of my partners have kids and absolutely benefit from having multiple male influences. Yeah. Okay.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 03:26 PM
1

Adoption isn't 'giving your child away' - it's asking for help to raise a kid you are unprepared for. Nobody gives their child away.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 04:22 PM
5

The crazy/hot matrix
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:24 AM
12

While I feel for you - my wife passed away last January after 17 years together - your anecdotal evidence cannot contradict the research. The best, most devoted and longest lasting relationships are those where both partners are their only partners.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 06:10 AM
55

True on an individual basis, but this is referring to men in the aggregate, not on an individual basis.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 12:58 PM
39

It's a way for dismissing legitimate men's issues. The term is derogatory in nature. It stands for "Involuntarily Celibate". In feminist speak, it means a guy who can't get any and is frustrated about it to the point they start hating women and the world. They often mistake guys who won't submit to their bull for this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:32 PM
1

Religious fundamentalists I assume
/r/MensRights19/06/19 02:03 PM
1

Don't be sorry - that was a hilarious type-o.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 01:53 PM
3

They whelped you? Umm.... well, they are your parents, but...
/r/MensRights24/04/19 01:48 PM
34

Some jurisdictions require parents present in case of an underage interview. Perhaps that's what he meant.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:48 AM
1

Just an accident. Sure.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 06:40 PM
8

That is a very interesting perspective, one I hadn't heard before.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:06 AM
2

...and the police took Daddy to jail
/r/MensRights22/12/18 03:11 AM
57

Only misogynistic shitlords advocate mutual respect.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:53 AM
1

It's a fairly standard misconception stemming from prudish, sheltered American soldiers in world wars 1 and 2 coming to Paris and seeing a relatively more sexually permissive society (the Moulin Rouge would have been shocking to 1940s Americans). As a result of the stories they brought home, there is a very old stereotype of French people being a bit loose in their sexual morality.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 01:22 PM
3

This is also historically why women are seen as more valuable in civilizations. Why 'women and children first!', why women aren't allowed in dangerous jobs or places, and why men are more likely to die young. This fact of biology is why there is a societal difference between men and women, and women feminists hate it.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 07:56 PM
1

Ahh, the plight of the professional victim. There comes a point when your victimhood overshadows your actual trauma. I get it - you've been hurt and that's horrible - but don't let that define you, otherwise you become something other than yourself.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 03:49 PM
1

*chute - unless you mean to deploy firearms against anthracite.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:10 PM
15

So you are saying people don't have free will? We pretty much have to screw each other without any choice in the matter?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:28 AM
0

Hahaha wow talk about European naïveté if you don't.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:45 PM
0

Are you so delusional to think it's somehow fair that I'm paying to keep you from watching a shirtless Vladimir Putin riding a T-90 through the Arc De Triomphe?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:00 PM
6

The reason why Europeans don't pay so much for defense is because the American taxpayer has been paying for the defense of Europe since 1945. Only Estonia contributes its appropriate share to NATO.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:23 PM
1

We've moved from a society in which we sorted out minor disagreements between ourselves to one in which we expect auhorities to somehow deal with every personal gripe (that may be good or bad, I don't know). I blame helicopter parenting.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 12:49 AM
1

The point is, it was like this.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:02 PM
-6

We (Americans) have this life stigma that you can go "make it on your own" and it's lack of success has many factors: It wasn't like this for previous generations, Yes it was. I was there. I am right on the border between Gen X and Millennial - went to college on my own dime in the early 2000's. Had to deal with both dot com bomb and the great recession. Lost my shirt when the housing market imploded. In each case I picked myself up and got to work, living way below my means so I could lay the f…
/r/MensRights02/07/17 02:59 PM
1

So liberal indoctrination 101. Got it.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:23 AM
1

"The patriarchy places more burden of child and family care on women, therefore a self employed accountant would earn less due to other demands on her time." That's the boilerplate response anyway. In the end, though, it's still her choice to work less and spend time doing other things less economically productive. She earns less because she chooses to earn less. Want to even the pay gap? Enforce a universal 40 hour work week, mandate paternity leave, etc.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:19 AM
104

That can't be true. Gaslighting only happens to women by shitlord patriarchs. /s
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:05 PM
7

So what's the back story?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 11:24 PM
7

"A ten foot fence only creates a market for eleven foot ladders." -Gary Johnson
/r/MensRights12/11/16 12:50 AM
1

Put up a poster next to it that says, "Being male doesn't make you toxic, and being female doesn't make you a victim."
/r/MensRights18/10/16 11:39 AM
2

Wat
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:26 PM
2

This is saying there are 246k cases of breast cancer for females, 2600 for males, 40k female deaths, 440 male deaths. It's saying there are 180k cases of prostate cancer, with 26k deaths, regardless of gender (all male).
/r/MensRights03/06/16 08:41 PM
5

They probably get dozens of them a week
/r/MensRights02/06/16 09:17 PM
5

Yeah, because they would have no choice but to lower tuition when the student loan gravy train gets cut off. Terrible idea.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 01:32 PM
11

The child was male, therefore oppressing them.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 04:33 PM
27

It only works that way when the outcome is to her advantage.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 09:33 PM
1

No problem - got a link?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 03:36 PM
7

True that! I thought I read New York - not York.. lol
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:54 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_IX
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:15 PM
10

I wonder if there's a Title IX argument here.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 05:31 PM
4

Generally it is hysteria. I don't know of any case anywhere where a bona fide semen donor has been held liable to pay child support. Now you do.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:18 PM
6

I'd rather not be mugged. I should be able to walk around the south side of Chicago at 11pm with a suit made of $100 bills and a sign that says, "beat me and rob me, I'm rich!"
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:32 PM
10

Actually that sounds more like Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:18 PM
14

You must be a dangerous predator then.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:03 AM
1

Slander/libel/defamation is actionable, even if I don't know the difference and am too tired to look it up....
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:25 AM
1

Fuck this lady. Pass.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:39 AM
1

We've seen the same argument made against same sex couples and such - they fail to convince anyone there as well. Ask the Catholic Church if they're having any luck with those arguments.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:21 PM
2

That's not the issue here.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:17 PM
0

Here's a quick article about too much porn causing erectile dysfunction.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 11:50 AM
1

In the US, we use English Common Law as the basis for our legal system - except for Louisiana which uses the Napoleonic Code. A recent Supreme Court argument actually referenced the Magna Carta.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:43 AM
94

If a female is approached romantically by an unattractive man, it makes her feel unattractive because he thinks he's "in her league", and therefore she must be on the same social strata as someone she perceives to be beneath her. By labeling him as a "creep", she can write off her own feelings of inadequacy by imagining him as some sort of psychopathic sex offender who would hit on anyone.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:12 PM
5

Yes.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:53 PM
-1

Doubtful she's faking this. Whatever happened, be it criminal or just perceived that way, she's obviously traumatized by something and coping with it through pinning her fear and pain on the backs of men everywhere. My heart goes out to her, but she needs to find help so to find healthier ways of coping and healing.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 08:49 PM
4

Shes very likely dealing with post traumatic stress resulting from a Sexual assault. Very common. Her ignorance is still inexcusable.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 04:13 PM
1

Elvis got drafted. So did Ted Williams. Other celebrities too.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:23 AM
2

It's not all bad. I ride the train in Chicago, and for the Metra (trains to the suburbs), you can drink alcohol on the train legally, except during certain days - festivals, etc. The result is I am in a group of about 10-20 people who always sit in the same place, in the same car, every day - and we know all about each other, take turns buying beer, and basically have happy hour on the way home. Helps when you have an hour train ride out of the city.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 05:22 PM
22

"you were supposed to fall in love with me" Yep. You've never heard of this before? I've had this happen to me - no shit. Girl started talking to me, I wasn't interested, she decided she loved me and started with the crazy. No false rape allegations, but I definitely put some distance between us after that. This kind of behavior is common - it's why we have anti-stalker laws. I know you're pissed off, hence the condescension, but I'm not kidding here - crazy females do exist and do this kind of …
/r/MensRights11/05/14 04:35 PM
51

Having been in similar situations, you're the idiot if you suspect it doesn't happen. This particular post may or may not be fabricated, but this type of situation is not uncommon.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 04:25 PM
1

Yeah, it's the Drudge Effect.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 04:59 PM
1

I was referring to the other 14/15 of black men who aren't in jail... Sorry, thought that was obvious.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 03:34 PM
8

Agreed. The problem results from an overabundance of single black females, because a large amount of black men are incarcerated. As a result, black men can hop from woman to woman, avoiding responsibility. It's a shitty situation - the more single black mothers there are, the more black men will wind up incarcerated, the more single black mothers there will be. edit: According to this, one in three black men will go to jail, and 1 in 15 are currently in jail. edit2: Another result of mass incarc…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:59 PM
3

Let's test it out, using the word in its proper context: I'm loosing the hounds on you.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:52 PM
5

Everyone does. GP lives in a hole.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:28 AM
3

Or is this just fantasy?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:02 PM
1

Found the story: Click me
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:21 AM
9

Unstable spouses make unstable parents as well.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:59 PM
6

My first year in college, I was a biology/pre-med major. The school I was in used quarters instead of semesters, so to have a full year of bio, you had to take three classes - Bio 101, 102, and 103. I had a teacher for a 'lecture hall' bio 101. Nailed it. Got an A, no problem. Same teach for bio 102. Nailed it. Got an A, no problem. For Bio 103, got a different teacher. Teacher used essay questions for a science class that should have tested on facts and figures and little else. When midterms ro…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:02 PM
2

If you read the article, they take that into account, and when total compensation is figured, the gap is only 3.6% - almost a rounding error.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:21 PM
10

MGTOW? Mice Growing Tails Over Wombats? edit: ok, ok, I cry "uncle," downvoters. Trying to crack a joke, but nobody gets it. Fine. My point still stands - never heard of MGTOW - what does it stand for?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:08 AM
1

Hysterectomy I think you mean a tubal ligation. Hysterectomies are only performed for drastic medical reasons. an abortion is not the same as a vasectomy because a developing fetus is comparable to a contract. And a marriage isn't? Marriage is one of the oldest recognized contracts in the world. Being married, his body is no longer his, just as her body is no longer hers. They belong to each other equally. Neither one has the right to make such a decision without the other. Otherwise, it's not r…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:00 AM
1

You could say that I have "trust issues" but from what I've read on this forum it's probably in my best interest to be cautious for my own sake. If you can't trust your wife, why did you marry her in the first place? I view my own marriage as though we are the same person with two separate brains. She has as much right over me as I have over her, and though I could push back and make decisions in a vacuum, I choose not to because of the nature of our relationship, and I expect the same from her.…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:36 PM
1

You have as much say over what she does as she has over what you do in this regard. Yes, it's your body, but you're married - your decision affects her. Just as if she were to get an abortion without telling you, and without your consent, is bullshit, you doing this without her consent and without her involvement is also bullshit. I recommend you talk to her about this and come to some sort of agreement - maybe you freeze some swimmers so she can hold out the hope of having another one some day.…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:32 PM
1

The only time I can see this being acceptable would be if the room was specifically for breastfeeding. Diaper changing though? Come on.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 01:44 PM
6

Curious - what's M101?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:22 PM
1

Consciously, anyway.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 01:40 AM
4

Here's how the trust fund works: Take in more money than you pay out in benefits Plow all that extra cash into US bonds. Wait to cash them in until needed. The government, then, gets to rob Peter to pay Paul. It effectively is allowed to use social security trust fund dollars for the general fund. The trust fund doesn't really exist, because all that money was put into T-bills. We will effectively have to pay those baby boomers with general funds once they start cashing in on those bonds. In ord…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 05:10 PM
1

Oh they have, but all the enlightened concepts in the world won't make biology irrelevant.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:37 PM
3

I know a stay at home dad. His wife is a doctor, makes a ton of money, but he'd still rather be the one working. It's really taking a toll on him psychologically - he feels unfit to be a husband and father, and it's killing his self esteem. On the flip side, it's killing her to be the one working. Her postpartum hormones are going crazy - all she wants is to stay home with the baby, feels like she's abandoning her baby, but she has to work because he won't make enough money to support them.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:59 PM
20

One more comment - while sarcasm may be evident between you and she, in court, the judge does not read sarcasm - he reads verbatim. If he sees her being the unreasonable aggressor and he being the reasonable one, guess who has a better chance of winning?
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:24 PM
11

And people wonder why SRS has a hard-on for this group.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:05 PM
1

Same problem - but I opt for the 'pissed off and unstable' look.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:41 PM
3

I'm not so sure - the study shows that women objectify other women as well.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 09:11 PM
1

which in and of itself is idiocy. This is far more serious than that. If it had been 8th grade boys doing this to a 5th grade girl, you better believe there would be felony charges.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:51 PM
3

How is sexual assault not a felony?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:37 PM
-3

Seriously.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:41 PM
0

What's a sock account?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:36 PM
-11

Seems to me that AnUnknown offered a legitimate criticism of the article that adds to the discussion here - the opposite of a troll. Just because (s)he isn't blindly agreeing with the MR hivemind doesn't mean they're a troll. Before you label someone a troll, stop and think if it's simply because you disagree with their point of view, or if they're really just getting their lulz out of circlejerking. Edit: Wow. Downvoted? Really? Since when did /r/MensRights turn into /r/politics?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:37 PM
0

No, you're missing the point. The fact is, college is nothing more than a job training program for the vast majority of students, no matter what your professor tells you. Colleges educate people for the workforce and charge people for it, which people take loans out to pay for. If they can't pay those loans back with the degrees they get, they're held accountable by the Department of Education or the bank. This causes poverty for people in their 20's as they struggle to obtain jobs in fields tha…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:07 PM
1

I'm saying that anyone should pursue whatever course of study they want - but driving themselves into unsustainable and unpayable debt to do it is the wrong way to do it. You want to go to grad school to study underwater basket weaving? Go for it - but the government isn't and the banks aren't going to give you a loan you can't repay in order to do it, and in the end, you'll be grateful.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:53 PM
1

I'm saying nothing of the kind. I'm saying that only the rich can afford to pursue careers that don't pay any money, and we should discourage people from getting into situations where they owe more for student loans than they can reasonably pay.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:56 PM
1

Yep, and less productive jobs will experience rises in wages, which will allow more people to enter. Wages will balance out over the long run, and we will have less of an income gap across professions.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:53 PM
0

How is it ethically questionable to steer people into positions that will actually earn them enough money to stay out of the poorhouse? I think it's ethically questionable to charge someone six figures for a degree in philosophy, then expect them to obtain employment that will pay enough to repay the debt. It's irresponsible to allow such situations to occur - similar to granting a $500,000 mortgage to a homebuyer making $30,000/yr.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:02 PM
0

Just because you have an aptitude for something doesn't mean you should make it a career. I happen to be good at playing video games, but I would be hard pressed to make a living at it.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:58 PM
7

I'm pretty sure weeglos means that students who'd be entering lower-paying jobs would receive more financial aid to compensate. That's pretty much the opposite of what I mean, unless you're talking about grants. If schools want to offer private grants to prop up certain departments that don't graduate students that are able to pay off their loans with reasonable ease, then it's their prerogative. The whole concept revolves around making sure that students who are sold a bill of goods by some soc…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 06:01 PM
2

I've been in favor of tying the amount of financial aid that a student can receive to the estimated starting salary of someone with their major. That way, we can make sure that students graduate not only with better job prospects, but with a debt load that takes into account what they'd expect to earn after graduation.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:56 PM
1

should read "men become doormats when..."
/r/MensRights31/01/12 09:44 PM
3

No, the default is 50% responsibility on either side. The man must pay child support if the woman chooses to keep the child. The woman must pay child support if the man asserts parental rights and gains custody. The man cannot force the woman to have 100% responsibility. She has the option to place the child for adoption, where she will have 0% responsibility. If the woman chooses to raise the child, she has a legal right to child support no matter what he says. She has the legal right to garnis…
/r/MensRights30/11/11 07:51 PM
3

Incorrect. If she chooses to place the child for adoption, the man can choose to retain sole custody and raise the child, though he usually isn't informed about this. Usually, when a woman tries to place a child for adoption (at least in my state), some notification has to be given to the man to either assert parental rights or forfeit them. Unfortunately, this is generally done by a legal notice in a newspaper somewhere, never to be read by anyone. In doing so, the courts have a sham method of …
/r/MensRights30/11/11 06:48 PM
4

The woman does not have to raise the child if she doesn't want to, regardless of what the man wants. She can put the child up for adoption, then she has 0% responsibility beyond birth, the man has 0% responsibility beyond birth.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 05:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter