TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

weekly_burner Archive

View 0 posts and 64 comments by weekly_burner on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Yes, between that and being a legitimate sexual predator, don't vote for this creep
/r/MensRights05/04/19 04:25 PM
2

The point is not that this particular man was assaulted though, it doesn't even matter if the photo is real to begin with. How do people miss the point so profoundly?
/r/MensRights17/03/19 09:31 PM
10

Logic and discourse do not function by you saying something absurd and then, when confronted by reason, demanding evidence to the contrary. You are the one making claims, the burden of proof is not on me, thinking you're full of shit. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
/r/MensRights14/03/19 06:27 PM
18

That's because you're innocent until proven guilty in this country dude. If someone calls the police to report a sexual assault (male victim, female victim, doesn't matter) and they investigate those claims, the existence of that invesigation is evidence that they believe the victim. Whether or not that investigation results in a conviction is almost irrelevant as that only has to do with how much physical evidence was left behind and how proficient the DA/defense attorneys/judge are. The stats …
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:27 PM
55

I'm confused as to how you think that statistic is relevant to the previous comment. The guy above you is saying courts have an anti-male bias. Your statistic in no way contradicts that, it simply shows how often there is a conviction overall in the system. Would love to see a statistic relevant to the discussion actually at hand here.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:00 PM
0

Yikes...
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:53 PM
-4

Unpopular opinion but aside from the racist shit, I don't think their political views are very dissimilar
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:59 AM
0

I can not imagine a timeline where the US voters go from Trump to someone like Yang in just four years but that would be simply incredible
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:09 AM
5

Yeah I feel like he might have the same effect Bernie did a few years ago where he loses by a mile but his ideas become mainstream
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:14 AM
2

He will never win but he has incredible stances and I wish more people were aware. He also has a realistic plan to implement UBI.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 01:47 AM
1

Poe's law meets an angry incel
/r/MensRights09/03/19 03:06 AM
1

This is honestly kind of sad but if you're that curious my phone has notifications and yes, I happen to be lucky enough to have plenty of downtime. Now are you going to dig even deeper to disprove that? What an existence, it doesn't have to be like this just so you know dude.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 03:02 AM
0

It was a Sunday LOL, not the mention I primarily work nights Imagine unironically thinking this shit, mind-blowing.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:46 PM
-5

Yes I am my own boss, I understand the struggles but overall I would say that sentiment is wrong and you just have to not be a retard, similar to most situations in life. Nice bootlicking though. Sad but it's all too common, have a good one.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:20 AM
-4

I mean communists do tend to share that one belief but no, it's not really exclusive to communism. Executives definitionally produce less than those under them (but seem to always have much higher salaries), not really a radical thought. You're free to get systematically fucked for fifty years then retire if that is your choice.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:30 AM
-8

You're the reason that they have jobs (if you call being a leech a job), don't be brainwashed
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:22 AM
2

Uhh...lmao
/r/MensRights24/02/19 03:15 PM
9

You're still gonna have to pack your shit up...
/r/MensRights23/02/19 06:38 PM
3

Are you new to the internet or being intentionally thick?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 08:09 PM
6

It definitely translates to reddit in a general sense but he literally made one claim that borders on commonplace knowledge...
/r/MensRights12/02/19 06:01 PM
1

My problem isn't a harsh tone, it's that you 100% misunderstood the point. GL with your strong opinions, mate.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:59 PM
3

Hopefully eight other people will tell me the same thing I literally just acknowledged to be true in my previous comment, thank you
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:43 PM
33

I can simultaneously understand why you're right and also still be annoyed by the mouth-breathing population of redditors that have to be spoonfed every part of an argument (regardless of how widely available the information is).
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:03 PM
41

How do these people find these threads without access to google.com???
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:10 PM
1

I agree if that wasn't clear
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:21 AM
4

Re-read my comment and try again, the only area we disagree on is the mass testing (as its going to be a waste 80-90% of the time, why not only use it in cases where someone is unsure).
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:16 PM
19

Ding ding ding... Tell society that a woman was victimized by a man she does not remember, while they were both drunk, in a location she can't remember, over 30 years ago and everyone is in a frenzy to grab their pitchfork. Tell society a woman victimized a man while he goes into explicit detail of the event that happened hours ago, obviously he made it all up.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:14 PM
8

No offense but I really don't think you're understanding. I'm not advocating lying when there are no consequences, I'm not advocating for filing false police reports when there would be consequences, etc. I'm saying that we, as a society, need to be able to have a conversation about something this controversial that doesn't devolve into "OP is lying" because it's irrelevant to the discussion. Did he lie? Maybe, I have no fucking clue. I'm not concerned by that though because women really do shit…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:04 PM
11

To your first point that people should scrutinize more, I do agree. But they don't, so it's functionally irrelevant to this conversation. And I guess you can have your opinion on the truthfulness aspect but I still do not see why it matters unless he's filling out a police report, this is an anonymous internet forum meant for discussion. He sparked discussion. It just happens to paint that woman in a horrific light. And we can't have that.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:06 PM
2

How do you find him, pick at random on the street? Can't really trust the obvious whore at that point.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:46 PM
6

The counter is that that is hugely wasteful and should just be implemented when there's a question from either parent/some other parents claiming parental rights
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:45 PM
34

Why that's a retarded mindset: Reverse the genders and no one is doubting female victims of...anything There are verifiable cases of this occurring that have gone through the US court system, anyone with internet access can see if they are participating in this conversation in good faith My personal favorite: why does the truthfulness of the OP even matter whatsoever? Are we not allowed to ask hypotheticals simply because they portray a member of an "oppressed group" (whatever that means in 2019…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:41 PM
0

I'd rather be thought of as an asshole that said correct things than a generally polite rube
/r/MensRights11/02/19 01:24 AM
1

It's literally in the nba rookie orientations, this is a shockingly common practice
/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:20 AM
3

What a fucking timeline that this is a factual statement
/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:14 AM
-1

You're obviously 100% oblivious when it comes to police interactions so it'd probably be best overall not to spew uniformed bullshit. I wonder how those imaginary clients ended up though...dolt.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:12 AM
76

That's what you get for oppressing...wait...
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:53 AM
11

We'll instantly get the dick Well, you're partly right
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:07 PM
1

She's objectively a moron, have her show you all the tinder murder rampages broken down by sex...oh wait...
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:08 PM
2

I'm not sure what you think "my model" is as I wasn't proposing anything, I find it kind of odd how controversial my comment was when I thought it was the next logical step from "false rape allegations are bad."
/r/MensRights21/01/19 11:39 PM
2

I already said that I agree with that and that people who do make false accusations should be punished. You don't need to get defensive, I'm on your side. I'm asking about logistics.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 09:52 PM
-5

Agreed that she should be punished but how do you accomplish that without dissuading people from coming forward with the truth? A woman that made a false accusation would never admit to it when it carries a decade of jail time but she might (albeit unlikely) currently.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 08:47 PM
-5

I...hmm...yikes
/r/MensRights20/01/19 08:39 PM
5

I understand what you're talking about but it's hilarious that they just laugh even when it's directly in their best interest to not be horrible at their job...
/r/MensRights20/01/19 05:52 AM
4

I'm not disagreeing but would you say the opposite is true as well then (i.e. can a man really understand life as a woman)?
/r/MensRights20/01/19 12:56 AM
1

...is it?
/r/MensRights14/01/19 09:37 PM
2

Must be rough misunderstanding literally all written text you come across
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:56 PM
-6

I'm sorry are you condoning rape??!!!??
/r/MensRights14/01/19 02:12 AM
13

You already know she wouldn't.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:54 AM
37

Hope the bitch got deported, what a joke...
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:18 AM
53

What are you insinuating, she should have to work for a living??
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:16 AM
9

Just because your spouse wouldn't support your dream does not mean that woman earned 60 billion dollars, that's simply ludicrous.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:15 AM
1

I don't see how it'd be possible since fines are meant to be prohibitive but I don't remember the details at this point, it's a famous case.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:07 AM
2

It's like the largest fine ever issued by the SEC (or was at the time?), have a good one
/r/MensRights10/01/19 04:06 AM
4

He paid a $32 million fine, you're both actually clueless.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 03:59 AM
7

Sorry man
/r/MensRights10/01/19 03:46 AM
9

The law is whataboutism, you heard it here first folks. Might as well tear down all these unnecessary jails and courthouses...
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:17 AM
12

I can't deny you're certainly brave! Going around here confidently spouting bullshit almost as if you didn't even have a serious mental impairment! Kudos to you, my favorite retard.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:10 AM
4

Thanks Obama
/r/MensRights10/12/18 01:56 AM
9

Dashcam checkmate
/r/MensRights04/12/18 05:54 AM
9

While the scientific method is great, something being "in a study" does not on its own mean validity, think about the actual claim being made.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 09:21 PM
12

That's retarded honestly, it's an individual basis (like most things). Some men are shallow, some aren't. Same for women. Anyone who generalizes, on either side, is at a minimum wilfully ignorant.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 08:39 PM
3

Explain this
/r/MensRights25/11/18 07:37 AM
2

To such a small extent that I would argue your comment is intellectually dishonest (or at least uninformed)
/r/MensRights28/10/18 08:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter