TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wes67stg Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by wes67stg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Sure, someone that is self-harming clearly has unresolved issues, but it is still very far from a suicide attempt. Otherwise, the actual suicide rate of men vs women would be a lot closer than they are now (or even higher for women). So using these cases as a way to hand wave away the very serious mental health crisis in men is wrong and vile
/r/MensRights04/07/22 08:24 PM
35

The 'women attempt suicide more often' myth comes from the fact that they count every case of self-harm as a suicide attempt. Women are more likely to engage in self-harm without having suicidal ideation/tendencies and the wounds that they get because of it are in the vast majority of cases not life threatening
/r/MensRights04/07/22 05:32 PM
2

On the wikipedia for gossypol, there are multiple side effects like low potassium, low sperm count for a long time after stopping (up to a year) and it might be toxic to humans at the level required for it to be a suitable contraceptive. I know wikipedia is biased but it is generally not too bad on purely scientific pages. Then again, there are some missing citations so make of it what you will Edit: i searched a little bit more and found one of the papers of this Dr. on gossypol published in 20…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:58 PM
3

I guess in her case the answer is bipolar
/r/MensRights08/06/22 01:13 AM
1

Says the person that thinks Lovelace contributed in any way to modern computing... She did "algorithms" based on someone else's notes on a machine that didn't exist and that has never been made since. This machine worked in base 10 while modern computers are based on the work of Boole i.e. base 2 She's a forgotten figure that didn't contribute anything valuable to society and that was found decades later and retroactively titled "first programmer" which is quite the stretch
/r/MensRights29/05/22 01:48 AM
3

I used 100 and 61 so 1.64:1 instead of 1:1 to 1.11:1 for 18 vs 17-20. And as i said, it's probably possible to lower the 18 figure even more, bringing the ratio closer to the original 1.64:1 And even then the 17-20 range (5:1 ratio between men and women) might not even be true since it uses data from the US and data from Australia but from the 90's. In the paper from the 90's , it showed that the gender gap reduced with time so it might be lower today. Also the article that I had linked said "5 …
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:00 PM
2

If you're less likely to be murdered than being hit by lightning, it means that you're more likely to be hit by lightning than be murdered. It's the same thing. She was right that what i said was too general because i didn't want to write an essay but the point still stands If you want to be condescending, at least make sure you're right. Of course if someone is condescending to me but doesn't at least make sure they know what they're talking about and make very obvious errors such as not readin…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:17 PM
12

being both condescending and wrong (see my other comment)
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:01 PM
20

Yes, violent crime tends to go down with time in western countries. Looking at the graph, it has a clear downward trend except for 2011. Maybe it has risen since then but i haven't bothered to check No, in 2017 there was 61 women that were murdered. The 75 figure is the total amount of murders related to domestic violence, of which 43 were women. Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it? > The majority (70%) of victims of Murder were male (141 victims). Less than a third of Murder vic…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 07:54 PM
49

Im just going to copy my comment from another post since it's always relevant when talking about Australia: Quick reminder that an australian women is literally more likely to be struck by lightning than to be murdered. 100 + people hit by lightning about 61 women killed in any given year
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:30 PM
1

You're delusional if you think this could lead to any legal repercussions. At best he might have been able to go to the school's administration and still she most likely only would've have been told to not hit other people again
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:05 PM
19

You're not a wuss for being polite abd holding the door. You're a wuss for infantilizing adult women and not holding them accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:08 PM
3

Quick reminder that an australian women is literally more likely to be struck by lightning than to be murdered. 100 + people hit by lightning about 61 women killed in any given year Then considering that not all of these women were murdered in a situation related to domestic violence, this continual push for these sort of laws just goes to prove how irrational and conspiratorial feminists are
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:51 PM
1

If you had actually read what i sent, you would've seen that there are non-hormonal female contraceptives (i.e. they don't cause undesirable side-effects). As for the hormonal ones, the side effects vary widely, going from none to highly undesirable and in many cases the side effects go away after a while. In the case where a woman has highly undesirable side effects, she can just use another one that won't affect her as much. As for condoms, if you had read what i sent, you would've seen that t…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:00 AM
1

here's a pretty thorough list of different contraceptive methods and their effectiveness Yes, you have to find a partner that is confortable with your boundaries. This is what I also said and it is true for both men and women
/r/MensRights21/04/22 01:21 PM
1

"Men can have boundaries but when they express said boundaries I will outright dismiss them because I don't like men having boundaries" It's not dangerous and immature, it is a valid boundary to have. I can just as well that forcing your partner to wear a condom is selfish because you only care about your own pleasure and not theirs, but it wouldn't make it less of a boundary to have. There are other contraceptives that are just as effective and that don't remove all pleasure from sex. And at th…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 12:34 AM
1

You literally said that a man not feeling comfortable performing certain sexual acts is not a boundary but him being lazy. Then went on to say that not wanting to have sex with a condom is also not a boundary. Both of these are valid boundaries. You can not agree with these boundaries and wonder why someone would have them but outright dismissing them as not valid is wrong and a clear display of bias/double standard
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:19 PM
1

You literally said that a man not feeling comfortable performing certain sexual acts is not a boundary but him being lazy. Then went on to say that not wanting to have sex with a condom is also not a boundary. Both of these are valid boundaries. You can not agree with these boundaries and wonder why someone would have them but outright dismissing them as not valid is wrong and a clear display of bias/double standard
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:19 PM
4

I mean, just look at the comments in any post that talk about women starfishing, or any post about hetero sex. All men know it. In general, women think sex should be more centered around women. I think this has to do with entitlement mostly... It literally writes itself... As for op's last point, he's saying that everyone has their own boundaries and they should be respected. If they are not, then it is not consensual sex. These boundaries don't have to be the same for both partners. If you thin…
/r/MensRights16/04/22 09:19 PM
8

Or you can just ask to split and see their reaction, which will most likely be better at seeing if the other person is entitled
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:33 PM
0

Im pro-choice but what you said just completely contradicts itself. The right to life is something man-made so it can be disregarded altogether so by your very own definition of what a right is, the right to bodily autonomy can also be disregarded altogether but for some reason you make a completely arbitrary distinction between the two where the right to life can be disregarded and not the right to bodily autonomy. You also say that the right to life cannot take precedence over the right to bod…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:49 AM
1

Yes, family courts are biased agaisnt men so the vast majority of primary care givers are women. This is a problem we would also like fix. You realise that even under shared custody, the one with higher income (most likely the father) still has to pay child support... Actually, currently, child support is not considered to be the child's money. It belongs to the primary caregiver and the courts assume that the primary caregiver will act in the best interest of the child. It is not always the cas…
/r/MensRights08/12/21 07:21 PM
2

Yet you haven't given a single valid reason on why a father shouldn't be able to see what his moneu is used for
/r/MensRights08/12/21 05:05 PM
2

It's very easy actually. The payments go to a bank account that both parties have access to to see how the money is spent. If it used for things not relating to the child, then the father has recourse to make sure that his money contributes ti the wrll being of his child and no one else
/r/MensRights08/12/21 04:49 PM
6

So 8 years of probation and being on the sex offenders list is somehow a lesser punishment than 5 years of probation? Especially considering that he commited a lesser crime...
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:46 PM
3

Feminists: If you want to solve men's problem start your own movement. men speak up Feminists: Men need to shut up and listen to women
/r/MensRights26/11/21 01:45 AM
2

If you see someone thst looks exactly like your rapist.. And then don't recognise him during a police lineup, you probably have no idea what he actually looks like and are lying
/r/MensRights26/11/21 01:30 AM
14

I didn't elaborate a lot since environmentwar is a well known troll, but my main point is that this all started because she saw him in a park, recognized him and then went to the police. Afterwards, a lineup was done and she wasn't able to identify him. The man that she chose because of his look wasn't Blackwater who was convicted. She had no idea who raped her but still testified that it was Blackwater which is a complete lie.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 07:08 PM
23

Why wasn't she able to identify him on the lineup?
/r/MensRights24/11/21 05:14 PM
44

Then she should've been able to identify him on the lineup, which she didn't. She didn't know who raped her but still said it was him during trial in order to get a conviction. She deliberately lied in court for her personal gain
/r/MensRights24/11/21 04:14 PM
52

Why did she identify him in court if she didn't know who he was? It's as if she falsely accused him...
/r/MensRights24/11/21 04:05 PM
4

Please explain how Mary P Koss testifying as an expert for legislations that specifically excluded men from being considered victims of rape when raped by a woman not misandrist and how your personal view of feminism does anything to undo that injustice
/r/MensRights12/11/21 08:19 PM
5

It doesn't mean that it's right, but it means thst you can't simply handwave it away because you don't want to engage with it. If you are not someone in a position of power, then your view of feminism is worthless. We couldn't care less what you personally think. It is literraly 100% irrelevant to any conversation about feminism or men's rights. What we do care about are the self-proclaimed feminists in positions of power that enact misandrist policies, some examples of which are in the post tha…
/r/MensRights12/11/21 07:37 PM
6

You don't need to? The point to takeaway is that what you think feminism is is completely irrelevant because you're a nobody on the internet. The best part is that she is a woman so you can't pull out the: you're a man so your opinion on feminism doesn't matter
/r/MensRights12/11/21 07:20 PM
6

Hopefully the queen's words can reach you. Otherwise it's not worth talking to you https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_real/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
/r/MensRights12/11/21 07:10 PM
5

It's very sad that he has to say in his statement that he "stands by survivors of sexual assault" when this is not the issue at hand but he is obligated to say it in order to not receive backlash
/r/MensRights09/08/21 08:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter