wesatloldotcat Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Don't be THAT girl - 2 I knew it was a joke Meekus, I just didn't get it right away! oh okay, I guess I was wrong to worry that Feminists/SRS/people curious about Men's Rights would take it the wrong way.	/r/MensRights	30/12/12 01:42 AM
5	Don't be THAT girl - 2 what it feels like to have these kinds of PSAs stuck in their face. I do get it, and that's precisely why I don't like it. I already know how it feels to be treated like a presumed criminal, either as a rapist, or a child molester. Or to be thought of as immature, or emotionally unstable, and dangerous because I've played video games. And I will not force someone into that same pain in order to show that it is wrong. It's possible to teach someone that hitting other people hurts without having t…	/r/MensRights	30/12/12 01:25 AM
2	Don't be THAT girl - 2 the difference is all people see rape as bad If that's true[1], then we don't need to create propaganda with language that presumes the superset is capable for the same crimes as the undeniable smaller subset. Otherwise, we behave like television news broadcasters, and shock our culture into believing problems are more common than they actually are. 1 - not all rapists see rape as bad. I refuse to let their fucked up perspectives ruin mine, and I hope you do likewise.	/r/MensRights	30/12/12 01:15 AM
-5	Don't be THAT girl - 2 Thanks!	/r/MensRights	30/12/12 12:49 AM
5	Don't be THAT girl - 2 It's unreasonable to presume all women need to be told this, just like it's unreasonable that all men need to be told "don't rape". I think people tend to act how you treat them, and find it's better to treat them like thinking humans.	/r/MensRights	30/12/12 12:46 AM
9	Don't be THAT girl - 2 sure, but in order for that to happen, then all types of women need to be subjected to this poster. I'm presuming that the above scenario is just as offensive to women, as the advertisements suggesting that I am capable of rape because I'm a man. edit: clarity	/r/MensRights	30/12/12 12:37 AM
9	Don't be THAT girl - 2 If the intended viewer is women who would have sex after drinking, then yes, I think the poster is targeted at the vast majority of women.	/r/MensRights	30/12/12 12:33 AM
6	Don't be THAT girl - 2 That dawned on me all too late. Thanks for posting.	/r/MensRights	30/12/12 12:25 AM
279	Don't be THAT girl - 2 Isn't this akin to "Men, stop raping" style of propaganda that treats the vast majority of men as rapists? While I agree with the picture, I don't agree that it's useful for broad (heh) strokes. Most women aren't false rape accusers, just like most men aren't rapists.	/r/MensRights	29/12/12 11:39 PM
0	A charity only for "Girls who code" by Reddit Donate How can you possibly compare [these charities]? The short answer is "I'm not; you are." The assertion was not "charities for men don't generate the same amounts of revenue as charities for women", nor was it "there are fewer charities for men than women", nor "the charities for women are larger, more well known, with wealthier benefactors, and provide more benefits to their beneficiaries". The assertion was that a charity created for men would upset people. I would put it to you that either the …	/r/MensRights	29/12/12 06:01 AM
1	A charity only for "Girls who code" by Reddit Donate Thanks for sharing your view point, but I still don't agree. Here are a few examples: YMCA Wounded Warrior Project Orchid Male Cancer Charity edit: politeness	/r/MensRights	28/12/12 10:38 PM
1	A charity only for "Girls who code" by Reddit Donate I wasn't aware of this charity before seeing it here, but it touts itself as "working to educate, inspire, and equip underserved girls aged 13-17 with the skills and resources necessary to pursue careers in engineering and technology." That doesn't sound all that bad. Empowering young women isn't the same as attacking young men.	/r/MensRights	28/12/12 07:39 PM
1	Imagine the girl with the black eye and the dude giggling ... why is this okay? Not much has changed you know. I lived with a violent woman and people would just laugh at me when I would bring it up. It's not fun being hit with frying pans and if you defend yourself you will be the one arrested... That's conjecture and subjective[1]. Art exists for itself, and allows us to derive our own meaning from it. How about this interpretation: They are two people who love each other, and they're maturely seeking professional counseling. 1 - I don't see the Japanese imagery. Maybe it's not clear enough in the images I've seen, or maybe it's made up in the writer's mind.	/r/MensRights	28/12/12 07:00 PM
0	Girl beats up man on train, other women reprimand him. what make you think that my link's attack was not "unprovoked by a mentally unstable person?" I think you might have misunderstood what I said. I do think the attack in your video was unprovoked, and initiated by a mentally unstable person. I think that because the attack appeared immediate, while the attacker said something crazy. Just because the perpetrator is a woman and the victim is a man, you automatically think it is provoked? The attacker made it clear their motivation was for an affair…	/r/MensRights	09/12/12 08:25 PM
8	Girl beats up man on train, other women reprimand him. I see what you're trying to do, but these are very different circumstances. You're posting people coming to the rescue of a blind person, who was attacked unprovoked by a mentally unstable person, in response to a person who chose not to physically defend them self, and did not do much to verbally defend them self. The behavior in either of those videos is not excusable, however it is simplistic, and offensive to suggest the only difference was gender related.	/r/MensRights	09/12/12 01:30 AM
0	That about sums up male privilege... upvoting for "WP:"	/r/MensRights	31/03/12 07:43 AM