TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

westhau Archive

View 2 posts and 78 comments by westhau on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

Would you care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights01/09/16 03:10 PM
20

A lot of people say it was widely available internet porn.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:52 PM
16

Men and women are on the same card, meaning they fight at the same event, not that they fight each other. I can see the confusion.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 05:42 PM
1

This sounds just like my work. I pee a lot and have to wait all the time. I was very poised.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 02:33 PM
4

But that's wrong. "fairness or justice in the way people are treated" from Merriam-Webster online. It actually distinguishes equal opportunity vs equal outcome, equity referring to the former.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 03:20 PM
11

You are right about this sub being an echo chamber sometimes. The issue I have is that domestic abuse is often about fear and the unwillingness to defend oneself. Even though the male may have been able to defend himself, if he doesn't, he should still receive help from the bystanders.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:48 AM
36

I just want to say that the reaction to the man abusing the woman was correct. What we are looking for is the same outrage when a woman abuses a man. No matter who the aggressor is, if the victim is not able or willing to defend themselves, people should step in to defend them.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:44 AM
9

No, but third wave and radical feminists are often directly at odds with what the movement is trying to accomplish. We may focused a bit much on their hypocrisy, but it is important if we want any sort of political traction.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:26 PM
49

Very good video. She manages to explain bilateral sexism in simple terms without alienating anyone, which is very hard to do. We need more people like her in the fight for gender equality.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:13 PM
2

Please update us!
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:33 PM
2

Excellent, excellent post. The points you make here go beyond Men's Rights, and if it was possible to link to /r/bestof from here, it would be a worthy post. If I could afford to give away gold, I'd probably do it.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:04 AM
3

He certainly handpicked articles, Take a look at the google search on male sensitivity and circumcision almost all articles taking a stance say that it does decrease sensitivity. Wiki is a notable exception, however. I personally have no problem with calling it male genital mutilation. I can see how people unaware with the consequences on male sexuality might take offense to the comparison to female genital mutilation. Personally, I have to wonder if the effects are as large in male genital muti…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:59 AM
2

Yeah, that's a good point. Think about it. Was he expected to stop the song and go "Whoa, whoa, whoa! Young lady, this is not appropriate behavior. Stop humping things and act like a lady!" His inactive disapproval is really all that can be expected from a performer.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:02 AM
1

Stuff like this is actually pretty common during war. It could be argued that this means that when all society goes out the window, man's true nature comes through and becomes a rapist. Of course this destroys the concept of rape culture as it would be culture that inhibits man's nature to rape.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:28 PM
9

Female Hypoagency Female Hypoagency Female Hypoagency Female Hypoagency Female Hypoagency
/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:24 PM
1

Right, the title seems to imply that men are more likely to be incompetent, which is awful. The actual article says that men are more likely to mask incompetence with confidence, which is reasonable.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 04:15 PM
2

The title is a bit off-putting, as well as that photo, but I think the content is pretty fact-driven and accurate. Confidence can provide a guise of competence, and I'm not surprised to hear that this occurs more in men. The way it was used though is insulting though, and has no part in the workplace. Any connection it has to your workplace would be insulting to the male individual, or arguing with the article she intended you to comment on, and I can guarantee that is not the reaction she inten…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:42 PM
6

Larissa took a pretty moderate view. Shannon is the only one agreeing with the mother. I'm actually pretty impressed that most people recognized that the assault was wrong.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:24 PM
2

I was curious about it, as that contradicts my sources. There is a flaw in that image. If 79.2% male rape victims report a female rapist and 50% of rape victims are male, the number of female rapists comes out as 39.6%, rounded up to 40%. But that's wrong. The article it cited listed 79.2% of male victims of being forced to penetrate were female. There were also male victims of rape, and 93.3% were male. This portion is not included in the table above (male on male rape, that is). So really the …
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:45 PM
1

Do you have any source for this? I'm trying to do this the right way with citations so we can really prove it to people with misconceptions.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:13 PM
1

The number commonly quoted is a blatant lie, but Men's Rights sources admit the pay gap actually exists at about 98 cents to the dollar if you equalize all other factors. This is surely attributable to a few sexist managers and not a systemic tendency to pay women less, though.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:20 PM
2

Oh absolutely. I also think if he has gone on record that he doesn't want the baby (A.K.A. abortion), then he shouldn't be required to pay, but he shouldn't get any visitation or custody either. That's kind of an either/or.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:37 PM
6

It would be very twisted if the shoe was on the other foot. A woman could rape a man, and get pregnant, and then would carry it for 9 months before any type of parenting would be had. What would probably happen is the woman would get an abortion if she knew she wouldn't get custody or visitation rights of the child (not always, of course). Basically you'd be pitting abortions against joint custody with a rapist. Nobody wins. This is one of those situations that, because of biology, there's not r…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:22 PM
2

Ms. Doucet went to trial in late 2009; she admitted the murder-for-hire plot but claimed that Mr. Ryan had subjected her to years of verbal abuse, and that she had no means of escape except to have him killed. Court heard that the couple had already been separated for months, and divorce proceedings were underway at the time of the alleged offence but no matter... So, perjury also, then...
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:15 PM
11

If she had bothered looking at any sorts of real data, she would know that men are pretty universally more harshly punished, particular when it comes to physical or sexual assault (including rape).
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:03 PM
7

And these are even some of the typical things that men are said to do: work longer hours, and do dirtier and more dangerous jobs.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:55 PM
3

I think the only people they will be able to get to debate them are people who are unfortunately ignorant of the inevitable outcome. That's their intention, though. Insult anyone who doesn't debate for being scared, and insult anyone they do debate so they look amazing.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:07 AM
3

You are quite welcome. I skipped ahead a bit and was further turned off by the repeated, "because you're dumb! you're so dumb you can't even X". Yeah that was really tough to go through. That was pretty much his only argument for nearly half the interview.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:49 PM
4

Yeah I was loosely working on something at the time but I can't believe I made it through it either. Thanks for letting me know about the triple reply, too. Deleted the others.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:05 PM
10

I saw this video last night. I wanted to find the link again so I could comment on it, but I gave up. Here goes... The woman in the beginning did seem a little unclear with her definition of "objectifying". This is where any substantive negatives to the woman are shown. The rest of the video is tripe and vitriol spewing from the self-labeled "Professor Plum". A name he gave himself to hide behind while he spews this hate while claiming that being bold and assertive is what men need. As we get a …
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:42 PM
16

The sad thing is feminists will take this as more proof of rape culture. I was assuming this, but decided to do a quick search, and yep, it's true. They don't realize that it's actually pointing out the ridiculousness of rape culture. It's also saying something that this type of comedy is still considered the "shock value" type. Ricky Gervais goes much farther than this, but saying something like this is still very taboo.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:10 PM
3

That was very eloquently said.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 03:06 PM
1

I was going to post this, but I took a look at the OP, and it was where clothing was first mentioned. It is a very common misconception that your dress will matter here. The other points are still valid, though. Being alone at night while intoxicated will increase your chances.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 03:01 PM
2

I may not have been clear. The point was that if he wants children, he is not a "stupid beta", but a man finding the means to his ends. You're right though. I think it's fair to assume that most men that go through with this are looking to have children.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:48 AM
4

Are you underestimating purpose of reproduction here ? Not at all. I go on to explain that if he does want a child, then this is a contract between he and the mother that is both fair, and mutually beneficial.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:17 AM
5

Your commentary in the title of this post is unwarranted, ignorant, and simply wrong. A "stupid beta" has nothing to gain from inseminating a woman without sex or a relationship. What he wants is a relationship, and physical contact, not fatherhood. If he does want fatherhood, then this is a means to an ends, and not any sort of coercion from the female. In fact, this is a pretty good solution for a MGTOW wanting a child. This is a mutually beneficial decision made by two consenting adults. If b…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:19 AM
7

The worst part is she claims this is all necessary for man's sake, but it's all for her. It's about her self-esteem. And if it truly does make her more attractive to men, she reaps the benefits of a better mate. Go ahead and do none of it, you can probably still get what you would consider a lower-quality mate, then it is ABSOLUTELY not my problem.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:48 PM
0

Hey guys, this is not really a men's rights issue. Obviously the mother didn't handle the situation well, but a parent will do a lot to protect their children, often irrationally. It only becomes a men's rights issue if he presses charges and nothing comes of it, when we know if the genders were reversed, the father would surely be charged. More likely than not, though, the skater did not press charges for one slap as he felt awful about hurting the child.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:34 PM
1

Good stuff. Decently active too.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 04:11 AM
2

A topic I started on /r/GenderEquality has gained some interest. It seems there is some interest from both sides on this type of discussion. Another user created /r/TrueGenderEquality after we found that someone had messaged the mod reasonably asking to try and support this sort of gender equality and got a very feminist slanted response (both the message and the reply found in my thread). If you are interested in this type of discussion, please check it out. If you have any content that you'd l…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:26 AM
1

Even if she was expressing more ambiguous signs of interest, when she continues along that line and gives drunken consent for sex, that's hardly the same as raping an unconscious person. That being said, if she was showing interest before she was drunk, she's not likely going to regret it the next day.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 12:31 AM
3

That's right but I'm pretty sure it's implied that consent was not given beforehand.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:17 PM
24

The headline says it all. A group tries to provide support for males, and it's labeled as "controversial".
/r/MensRights16/08/13 04:53 PM
3

It always bothers me that these two are put in the same category. Like a woman is unconscious and you decide to go ahead anyway, yeah that's rape. If a woman has been showing interest throughout the night, but by the time you get to the act she's sloppy, but still very interested, not so much rape, even if she decides to say so the next day.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 04:32 PM
1

I have never lived, no. I've visited plenty, though. I was actually basing this on discussions with others from other places, but I'm definitely stretching to say that none of the other places experience the same heightism.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:57 PM
191

This is unbelievable. That judge should be taken off the bench and disbarred immediately.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:42 AM
7

"the idea that it's shameful to just have sex because you want to" is "the reason that you have false rape accusations in the first place." Marcotte noted that "women who aren't ashamed of having sexual adventures like group sex-even ones that go bad-don't use rape accusations to cover up their choices. If this is true (seems logical) then as it turns out feminism may actually be able to solve at least one of the Men's Rights issues.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:28 AM
13

Happening all the time has to do with the area. That area is highly Mormon, and sex is extremely shunned outside of marriage (relating it to the stated cause of false rape accusations in the article).
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:27 AM
12

Yeah, you should probably actually read the article.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 08:54 PM
6

I think this would be a great article to point someone to when they give you that sneer after admitting to being a MRA. It shows just enough objectivity to convince someone that maybe, just maybe, we have a reason for our movement.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 08:51 PM
1

It's a de facto male trait, but men come in varying heights independent of their masculinity.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:54 PM
1

Well, I think a lot of feminists would reply with something like "When you get paid less for doing the same work." etc., basically confirming that their problems are the only ones that matter.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:32 PM
1

This is definitely true. In fact, it's mostly in Western European and North American cultures where heightism is so prevalent. In places like Latin America, Africa, and Asia, height is not as big of an issue, because they aren't exposed to the same associations of height and power/masculinity as we are.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:07 PM
2

I guess not. Sorry about that. It did seem to be strongly implied here, though: tall guys have lower testosterone rationalization. Testosterone levels at puberty are responsible for all the desirable masculine traits. Broad shoulders, thin waist, square jaw, etc.. In any case, you're right and it's not exactly fair to say tall guys have lower testosterone, but it is fair to say that some tall guys have lower testosterone, as in the lower testosterone actually contributes to their height.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:49 PM
1

But tall is not a masculine trait. Testosterone is sometimes used to start a puberty (including growth), but in all other cases it stunts growth. Men who have Klinefelter syndrome or 'XXY', have all feminine traits including (sometimes) infertility, small testes, narrower shoulders, wider hips, lack of facial hair... and be taller. Also, when castrating males was a somewhat common practice, castrated males would grow significantly taller than their non-castrated counterparts. There is not one pi…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:33 PM
8

That's actually a common misconception, though. I post over on /r/short and I've had to, on more than one occasion, pointed out that being taller is not actually more masculine.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:05 PM
1

Definitely not a troll. Regularly posts there, doesn't switch tactics when proven wrong to continue to incite, legitimately tries to explain things. I think she may have actually taken something away from the interaction, but perhaps I'm just being hopeful.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:50 PM
14

In the immediate reply, the guy says: I see this argument from feminists a lot, and I have only one question: When is it sexism against men? Answer me that honestly. Can it EVER be sexism against men with the kind of perception of reality you espouse here? ...she never addresses that.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:47 PM
32

Yes it is, and yes they did. It's actually a pretty good tell-off if anyone is interested. Guys don't consciously exclude or demean shorter men, but they still do take them less seriously. That's what the sub is about sometimes, but more often than not it's women perpetrating the heightism against men.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:45 PM
13

It sort of sounds like talking a good game to get attention from girls. It doesn’t even sound academic. For me the motivation was not to get these girls into bed. Sex is only the exclamation point on what you really want. What I am addicted to is affirmation and validation from women. That is what I wanted. That is what this whole thing was set up to get. I didn’t need them to want to fuck me. It made no difference to me if they thought of me as a potential boyfriend or a potential father. What …
/r/MensRights13/08/13 10:07 PM
1

Meh, very little point outside of this discussion. I was just looking at it as a way to get a more clear answer as to my assertion.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 03:07 AM
1

At first, my comment was getting positive responses, then everyone went crazy on it. Really not sure what's up. I agree that there is some conditioning going on here, but my statement was very moderate. All I said is that I would expect there is some real gender difference in the emotions, and not just cultural conditioning.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 03:05 AM
1

I think this is dangerous territory when we deny that there are differences in the genders. Additionally, there may be a biological sex component here. It's easy to imagine that having something forced inside you feels more violating than having something put around part of you. An interesting way to test this would be to check with gay men who have been raped each way (forced entry and made to penetrate) and see how they feel about the different forms of rape.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:57 PM
1

I am getting very frustrated here. Many people are misinterpreting what I said and downvoting. I didn't mention the desire to have sex in my post, as it isn't relevant. I am talking about the emotional responses which are different in genders (which the post I was replying to was mentioning) and attempting to explain it.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:54 PM
2

I didn't say it was about enjoying it. Did not mention that and explained an entirely different point. Also I was not lessening the gravity of the crime, just attempting to explain the phenomena of men taking being raped more lightly, and I said so in a below post (though that one was downvoted).
/r/MensRights08/08/13 11:09 PM
1

From the comments: Women do not kill at the same rates as men. Secondly, men are more likely to get away with it using this lame defense where a woman would be imprisoned. Not saying he won't be but men seem to get away with murder, no pun intended far more often than not More like opposite. Not even sure here she gets that...
/r/MensRights08/08/13 10:45 PM
0

This is really big news. I hope this sub keeps up with it. If it were a woman, it would be labeled clear-cut self defense. As this is a man, he could easily get manslaughter and possibly (I hope not) worse.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 10:11 PM
0

You're assuming here. Of course you can't really get in someone else's head, but I am not making this observation based on men's and women's reactions.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 09:10 PM
0

Well, I haven't been downvoted yet, so there's hope. Also you put it very well and in a fair and non-generalized. And the different reactions doesn't mean that the perpetrator is any less at fault, or should be subject to any lesser punishment. Yes. This is where the feminist argument breaks down. Stealing $20 from a rich man obviously has less impact, but it will never be treated any less harshly than stealing $20 from a poor person. Surely the social stigma is different, but that should not af…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:37 PM
1

I think the issue here, is that men don't mind as much being raped. Hear me out. This theme is taken to the extreme by feminists in claiming that men can't be raped, and as a joke by many (you can't rape the willing!), but it's based in truth. In this situation, most men would feel slightly violated, but dismissive because to them sex isn't as big of a deal. To a woman, it is generally a bigger deal and being forced into it is very emotionally disturbing, though I may be projecting the idea of v…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 07:19 PM
1

apparently it's http://www.reddit.com/create Apparently it also doesn't work on accounts younger than 30 days (which mine is). If you want to make this sub, feel free. Otherwise I'll do it in a few weeks.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:51 AM
1

I'm new to reddit. How do you make a sub? I was thinking /r/genderequality as /r/equality already exists (it's concerning topics of race etc. as well. surely a worthy subreddit, too).
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:46 AM
1

Do you think it'd be worth trying? Someone could make it, and if it turned to shit just abandon ship, ASAP.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:30 AM
1

I think that is a very good idea. It would probably be a small subset of feminists and MRA's that would be able and willing to participate in such a sub, but it could work out really well for those who wanted to participate. You're right about the modding, though. It would be full of vitriol masked as discussion, and vice versa.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:26 AM
2

There is one notable difference in these two images. It has nothing to do with the characters, but the clothing. Both sexes in both pictures are traditionally attractive. The only difference is the woman is more scantily clad in the man's fantasy, and the man is more in the woman's fantasy.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:03 AM
1

I agree with your premise. This sub tends to be a bit of a circlejerk. We find evidence over and over that is the same stuff, and we just roll our eyes and go "not this again". It's not really a place for discussion because there's not much to be had. I think your example is a poor one, though. Prison time is one of the largest areas of discrepancies in men's rights. What I think would improve this sub is if we'd be able to have genuine good discourse on topics like this. The problem is it's way…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:54 AM
0

I agree. They don't exactly make it a huge deal, but I don't see any joke. On the contrary, the Jon Bobbit jokes have been consistent since the incident.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 10:33 PM
5

I'm not even slightly mad. It was, and still is, the norm in the US. Lack of sensitivity is not even a minor concern for me. I realize it would feel better with my foreskin, and also that this may be an "ignorance is bliss" situation, but it really holds very little bearing on my life. Of course, if I have a son, I intend to leave him uncircumcised, despite the fact that my current girlfriend thinks it should be done because it "looks like an anteater". I also wonder if you may be a bit off in y…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 10:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter