~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | girlwriteswhat comments on her experiences with male feminists.I can't do this anymore. You are just too fucking stupid. This is the last time I will try to explain anything to you. According to intersectionality, IF divorce were even applicable, which is arguable, women would suffer more because they are both divorced and women. It is impossible for a divorced man to suffer more (all things being equal otherwise), because he does not suffer in anyway purely because he is a man. Why the fuck do you think I'm blaming feminism for everything? It's especially … | /r/MensRights | 10/03/13 07:08 AM |
| 2 | girlwriteswhat comments on her experiences with male feminists.but rather that the are men in divorce. You have got to be fucking kidding me. Intersectionality is not about that. According to intersectionality in feminism, if it's even applicable here, then the divorced status is where the oppression comes from, not from being male. And every single man who is required to register for the draft? That's just the intersection between being male and 18 years old? Once again, you are pulling shit out of your ass because intersectionality in feminism doesn't giv… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/13 06:30 AM |
| 1 | girlwriteswhat comments on her experiences with male feminists.Johnella Butler claims that new methodologies growing from this new paradigm would be "non-hierarchical" and would "refuse primacy to either race, class, gender, or ethnicity, demanding instead a recognition of their matrix-like interaction." But what is this saying exactly? Are you suggesting that it says that a white man can be oppressed for being a white man, or that a woman can be privileged simply because she is a woman? It seems like it could be saying the same thing the matrix of dominati… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/13 01:51 AM |
| 4 | girlwriteswhat comments on her experiences with male feminists.You're missing the point. None of us here are even saying that women have it worse than men or vice versa. But YOUR intersectionality theory, at least as it is defined by the links you keep providing, DOES definitively say that all other things being equal, (such as a black man and a black woman), the black man has it better because he is more privileged by virtue of being male. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/13 10:42 PM |
| 4 | girlwriteswhat comments on her experiences with male feminists.I simplified to make it easier to see what was happening. I can try to explain again, but it seems more complicated to me and it's already been explained several times in this thread why what they are saying makes no sense. GirlWritesWhat said that feminists said that women can be oppressed for being women, that male privilege exists. They also don't believe that female privilege exist or that men can be oppressed for being men. spermjack_attack goes on to say: but feminists also believe that bl… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/13 10:32 PM |
| 6 | girlwriteswhat comments on her experiences with male feminists.why is feminism seen as opposed to MRAs? Because feminism, even with intersectionality, does not acknowledge that one can be discriminated against purely for being male. You haven't provided anything that says otherwise. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/13 09:21 PM |
| 3 | girlwriteswhat comments on her experiences with male feminists.You keep quoting the same things but what you are saying doesn't mean anything. This is basically what you are saying: GWW says that feminists believe A=A, but they don't believe that B=B. IloveBees says but wait! feminists also believe that C=C, D=D, and E=E! It doesn't make anything GWW said less true, and she never claimed that what she said was the full extent of feminist theory. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/13 09:06 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter