TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wh_atsuperother10_9 Archive

View 0 posts and 83 comments by wh_atsuperother10_9 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I said this on r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates and I'll say it hereon, too: Levine has nothing for which he has to apologise, so his apologising is, I hope, just something done to please the moaning members of the public, not because he actually personally believes he is in the wrong for acting the way he towards his fan, or because of his mouthing fuck during his performance when his fan came up to him. You're not the injured party here, Levine; you're over-excited fan is.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 10:35 AM
16

I'm not going to pretend like women don't face any hardships, or that being a woman is easier than being a man, but the current discourse on gender often makes me wonder why anyone would want to be a man. Or at least, I have a hard time letting myself feel okay about being one. All of these feelings have only gotten worse the more I get invested in gender issues. As someone with OCD, can I just say that many people who have what has been called TOCD, standing for transgender OCD, have reported s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 07:05 AM
14

I know how you feel, OP, as while there are some subs on Reddit that do earnestly talk about the issues boys and men face in society, there seem to be so few that come specifically from a leftist point of view, which is why in so many ways I was delighted, like you, to have found this sub awhile ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 04:18 PM
2

If I had a son, I'd have a hard time not going on a full-on papabear rampage against all this sexist horseshit. I don't know why, but your saying "papabear" just made me go "awwww" allowed. I think it's grand that you'd be so defensive of your son, like any parent ought to be of any child they have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/21 04:13 PM
5

I happened to come across this article just the other day when it was first published; it honestly simultaneously irked me and disgusted me, as the language that this sexual abuser used in reference to the boys she abused apparently 'wanting it' because they are "horny", "hormonal", "flirty", and "flirtatious" ... it honestly just goes through me when an adult speaks of a minor like that; she ought to be ashamed of herself.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 08:46 AM
8

I haven't been following this sub for long, but I do like some of the material on the sub, so it's nice to see it is doing well, I guess. Well done!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/21 02:49 PM
20

No, false accusations from anyone toward anyone are absolutely always unjustifiable, sometimes life-destroying, and ought to be treated in the severest way for the person(s) who have done it, and in the most caring way for the victim(s) or survivor(s).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/21 01:49 PM
15

While I do adore The Simpsons, especially Homer, I have to say that, yes, I do very much find Homer as a doofus dad character very, very problematic. Likewise with Bart, though, as he represents that typical boys-will-be-boys boy to so many people, I think, especially since he is so rebellious, uncaring about his grades, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 09:22 PM
11

So many insults and slurs for men is they are gay and not masculine. As someone who is gay, I can attest to the truth of this, yes; furthermore, I think the association of many gay men or gayness per se with femaleness, femininity, being unmanly, even womanly is immensely intersting, maybe even telling, especially when you consider how many homophobic and anti-gay slurs that anti-gays use are revolved around some gay men's liking anal penetration by way of penile-anal sex with another man. There…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/21 09:09 PM
12

As a gay person, this post is immensely, immensely welcomed, and exploring the intersectional aspects of gayness, homophobia, heterosexism, heteronormativity, etc., and how they affect gay men, bi men, other men who are attracted to men and or other men who have sex with men, and people who were assigned male at birth and identify as gay and have romantic, sexual, and or emotional desire or relationships with men, I have to say that I found this all very interesting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/21 09:04 PM
9

I really believe a massive component of boys' being sexually abused by a woman or a man's being sexually violated by a woman is often praised and not understand as an issue of great enormity, not always because all boys and all men are these horny beasts who will always want to be sexual with an older willing woman if they can, but because boys and men are not always taught to see the bogeywomen that do exist in the world like girls and women are taught (rightly) to see the bogeymen in the world…
/r/MensRights14/10/21 08:15 AM
5

From the little that you've told us, I ready don't understand why you were slammed, as it seems that you were in right, pointing out that there are male victims of domestic abuse as well as female victims, but whatever we're going to get people's saying "...but men are the majority of these abusers!" is absolutely beyond me. Certainly, yes, point out who is generally commiting most crimes by all means, but just stop bringing up unnecessarily the gender of the victim or survivor of a crime whenev…
/r/MensRights14/10/21 08:10 AM
7

Well, I'm very conservative on some things, but I'm generally very, very much on the Left, but I have only ever experienced being called a person on the Right in terms of my speaking for boys' and men's rights indirectly, but, honestly, I don't really care.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/21 11:22 PM
2

Why so?
/r/MensRights13/10/21 02:27 PM
45

I can see where you're coming from, but I don't think just because someone does something voluntarily that it does not make it necessarily degrading for the person's doing it, as it is (A) theoretically and practically possible for someone to engage in self-degradation and thereby be complicit in her own degradation, even, perhaps, without her even knowing it or recognising it as such, I think; and (B), while it is contested the degree to which pornstars enter the porn industry of their own voli…
/r/MensRights12/10/21 05:33 PM
7

Absolutely atrocious. She ought to be ashamed of herself. This is just filthy.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 06:14 PM
1

Your desire to search for 'causative factor(s)' shows that you recognize this as a problem and are looking for solutions. That may be the impression got by you, but I am not interested in paternalistically forcing women and men to make the same decisions to enact an equal outcome, so, no, you're very, very mistaken, but if you wish to ignore what I've said, then that's up to you. Apparently they would except for these 'causative factor(s)' that you want to research. Once again, if women and men …
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:14 PM
1

Could you give an example or two of an existing technology that should be banned/re-engineered according to XF? I am not able to probably give one off the top of my head, I'm afraid, no, but of course that doesn't mean there are none.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:15 PM
1

Different level of empathy people feel to men compared to women. You mean sort of like men often seem to be typecasted perpetrators and women as victims in certain settings - in other words, moral typecasting? Unfortunately, both that definition and the definition you gave are quite wide, and they can apply to weapons, videogames, free market and urinals. Could you explain it on some examples? If you're asking for a definition of xenofeminism, I would define xenofeminism with a working definitio…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:53 PM
1

Yes, I've seen a good few of Peterson's videos and lectures; as a matter of fact, I find some of the advice he gives quite good, and, yes, I am wholly aware of the fact that in some egalitarian societies there more gender-based differences in terms of behavioural, occupational, etc., activity.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:43 PM
1

Yes, aka the empathy gap. I strongly disagree with treating anyone as disposable, but I came to this conclusion. If you don't mind, would you briefly tell me in your words what the so-called empathy gap is, as research has proven basically useless? [...] we have achieved a lot as a society in fighting [against prejudice and discrimination against different groups and different peoples], and continue to achieve more. [...] social activism plays a huge role in these achievements. [...] I believe […
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:57 AM
2

I believe it's because of the role women play in the reproduction. Biologically, a woman can become a parent to a child once per year at best, while for a man that number would be much higher. So women are the bottleneck here, and that makes them more valuable from the view of species surviving. Interesting. Bearing in mind what you said about its probably being genetic and cultural below, would you say, then, that this is why men are apparently 'disposable', as women are apparently more valuabl…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 09:39 AM
2

So women are not picking careers as you would have them choose? With the greatest respect, however did you conclude that I wanted women and men to choose certain jobs based off my saying that I want to know why women and men choose different jobs? You've completely missed the point and straw-manned me, it seems, as I legitimately never said that anywhere, and I do not see how you could infer that from what I said at all. You have it backwards, show me why you think men and women should make the …
/r/MensRights05/10/21 09:30 AM
0

I did read once that teaching, secretary work in USA, etc., was predominantly a male job once, but upon girls' starting to attend school, I believe, women were hired and wages for jobs like teaching and whatnot were reduced for whatever reason(s).
/r/MensRights04/10/21 10:47 PM
3

I'm already aware of it.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 10:16 PM
20

This is an interesting but unoriginal finding, in my opinion. Plus, I am interested in the causative factor(s) behind women's and men's generally choosing different careers and whatnot which may for whatever reason(s) results in one group's typically coming out worse, economically speaking.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 08:12 PM
97

I think it's brilliant that you've done this, OP, as raiding awareness for folks of all genders who have experienced domestic abuse is elemental for justice for the sake of all victims and survivors of domestic violence, I believe.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 11:40 PM
2

Wait, I'm genuinely confused: segregation for whom?
/r/MensRights03/10/21 08:13 PM
2

I'm unsure what to make of this, because on the one hand I think it is critical for the Labour Party of the UK to maintain this image of its being the party of the people for its own interest, which means being not just the pary for people who are White and British-born, but even people who are foreign-born abs wish to be naturalised as British, whether they are White or not. I do think some of this is just a performative measure on the part of some of these delegates, so, again, I don't know ho…
/r/MensRights28/09/21 01:34 PM
10

Considering she seems to be an amateur when it comes to this, this isn't too bad a video, at least in comparison to some of the other videos I've seen on YouTube which detail the transitional phases of some former feminist activists to present men's rights activists, many of whom I have seen deliver their points in a highly emotional and overly emotional way, which I dislike because often than not they just slipped into irrational behaviour and trashy, immature name-calling of feminists. I actua…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 09:18 PM
17

An immensely intersting finding. I would be interested in getting an answer to why the effects of sexual abuse, sexual assault, and or rape on non-female/feminine genders wasn't studied, but this is an essential study either way.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 11:00 AM
20

I hate hasty generalisations about anyone, as they are usually unable to be rationally universalised, so they are not only factually incorrect, but they are sometimes even objectively harmful towards the person(s) which they are being directed at. Notwithstanding double standards, I understand that when some people make hasty generalisations that they are to not always be taken literally, as they may not be spoken literally, but, say, figuratively in some fashion or they may be inspired by anger…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 08:28 PM
0

I feel that critical discourse on most if not all matters is absolutely critical, so, no, I don't think banning feminists and feminist activists, such as myself, from this sub is productive in any way to critical, civil debate, like I don't really believe it is always productive to ban non-feminists and or anti-feminists, such as yourselves, from feminist subs. I think the only time at which a ban from a sub could be justified, other than the obvious reasons which most subs have rules-wise, is i…
/r/AntiFeminists19/09/21 02:52 PM
1

I actually agree with you; I think the way you worded it didn't do you justice, but you've made yourself clearer now. :)
/r/MenSupportMen16/09/21 10:10 AM
15

I don't believe there's a way that women work per se; women, like men, aren't some kind of riddle to be solved, you know.
/r/MenSupportMen16/09/21 09:04 AM
17

Though maybe unpopular because of its being used in a lot of feminist discourse, which I don't think a bad thing, I believe the term slut-shaming is a grand term and concept to describe phenomena where a person of any gender is shamed for having an active, healthy sex life (especially on a casual and regular basis with different sex partners), although it generally is a gendered phenomenon, I believe. As a gay person, I can absolutely attest to being slut-shamed, even when you may not be a slut …
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:01 PM
5

If anyone gropes anyone at school, the perpetrator(s) ought to be punished in some way. End. Of. There. Is. No. Excuse.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:50 PM
1

I think gendered language is actually a much more complicated topic than many think. Certainly gendered language is not as reductively simple as I may have made it sound with my explaining it in the fashion I did, but I'd definitely love to hear your reasoning behind your thinking it more complicated to see if we mesh on the matter or not. For me, while gendered language can be a pedantic matter and while it can lead to nonsense, I do support using language that is more neutral and inclusive for…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:37 AM
8

I'm not going to lie: before I exposed myself to MRA material, I did think in a very blanket way about MRAs, thinking that all MRAs were necessarily sexist towards girls and women and necessarily misogynist, but you're always going to get a few bad apples in every bunch, I suppose, but I can't say my personal experience has overwhelmingly supported this, although I hear others' experiences have, so I guess it's a highly subjective thing maybe, no? I don't know. I definitely discord a lot with so…
/r/MensRights06/09/21 09:12 PM
5

Frankly, I hate terms like bad guy and good guy, even when they are used in reference to a non-man character, as it reproduces this image of the villain's necessarily being male, masculine, or otherwise man-like, rather than another gender, which is why I opt for more gender-neutral language, like villain, for instance, as this can apply to any gender in both practice and in theory. Though some would furiously charge me 'politically correct' for doing this, I really do try to not give a shit, as…
/r/MensRights06/09/21 09:07 PM
7

Agreed. This asymmetrical presentation reminds me of the so-called 'boys are stupid, throw stones at them' phenomenon.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 07:45 PM
2

I think it may be natural insofar as women's typically being less big in size and weight than typical men, thereby being perceived as threatening on the basis of the sex or gender alone. Seeing a big person, like a typical man, may be more daunting, although we simply must try to overcome moral typecasting of persons because of their sex, sexual orientation, gender, race, religion, or other factors, and this applies here, I feel. Remember, though, women's being seen as weak and in constant need …
/r/MensRights06/09/21 05:20 PM
9

But what makes this case remarkable is that writers were aware that they were trying to tackle on female stereotypes (which is not a bad thing), while at the same time they purposefully reinforcing the most negative male stereotypes. I wholly agree! I do think it is a shame when one defends, say, girls' and women's rights then one is necessarily seen as being against boys' and men's rights, and vice versa. I don't think speaking about, say, boys' and men's rights (or vice versa) and the negative…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/21 03:32 PM
62

I've always had a soft spot for Jackman, as I grew up watching him, particularly in X-Men, Australia, and a few other movies. Reading this was just lovely and I sincerely hope you heal, Mr Jackman. <3
/r/MensRights06/09/21 03:27 PM
42

Like I said on r/MensRights, this gets on my nerves infinitely. I think this affects all genders to and I think it is accepted or not accepted in different contexts depending on different factors; for instance, I think it would be wholly acceptable to cast someone playing a trans character to be non-blending as their gender. It's sort of like how some rape scenes in some media are really just wholly unneded.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/21 03:13 PM
32

Arguments over labels aside, I have always despised how the 'stupid man, the man-child, the uncouth man, etc., much like the 'ditsy woman', the airheaded woman, the beautiful but unintelligent woman, etc., has always been placed in movies. It has always really, really bothered me, but I think what makes it seem so normal is that these figures have become so naturalised in different media, thus displaying when something so bad becomes so normalised how bad it really has begun to get. It's like ho…
/r/MensRights06/09/21 03:08 PM
1

Adding on to what I said earlier, I think we also need to take into account intersex people who are, like transgender people, apparently quite the minority, although some intersex variation and other differences in sex development are not traceable or even known about until an older age or even at all, as some intersex variation and other differences in sex development is present on one's chromosomal pattern, for instance. After thinking about it for a few minutes, I can see the benefit in tryin…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 09:21 PM
1

There's a small subset of the population who identify differently from how they were assigned at birth which might give them a different perspective on this relationship dynamic, but that doesn't diminish the "on average" finding per se. I never said this subset ought to diminish the overwhelming typical majority, did I?
/r/MensRights04/09/21 08:51 PM
2

We are in agreement, I do think that the prefix cis is necessary to highlight specific medical issues for example, but the AFAB and AMAB is overkill, I don't really need it in my life. That's my opinion on it really. Personally, I like cis and I like AFAB and AMAB, but, obviously, if you don't wish to use those terms, that's you're right. Jackasses won't stop, no matter what we use or do to be fair. No, because bigots are bigots, so they don't typically care about rationality or logical reasonin…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 08:28 PM
2

Ah, well, I didn't know this and I am a transman (then again, I don't follow woke terms). We (the trans community I'm part of irl) don't use these acronyms (not in English and not even in French) and I honestly don't think they are imperative to be trans-inclusive, at all. Well, since you're a trans man, I'm not going to tell you what to say and whatnot, but on a personal note, as a gay person, I don't personally received these terms as woke, but they aren't my terms, you know. To me, the words …
/r/MensRights04/09/21 08:03 PM
2

I would say that financial difficulties tend to affect men in relationships (with women) more negatively, as stereotypically it is a masculine duty to provide financially for their families and men are seen as making more money than women in general (no matter what people think of the pay gap issues). I think I can agree with this assessment, yes, at least from what I understand of the matter so superficially, although I shall definitely endeavour to pursue it further and unearth the facts aroun…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 07:00 PM
2

The less money the lower and middle class have, the more tensions and conflicts arise between romance interests/partners. Whom do you think this affects most? Would you say the effects of this are gendered? Hypergamy has always been there, but the living conditions of a society can make it worse. Since you believe hypergamy has always been here with humans or just with certain humans to whatever degree(s), would you say hypergamy only or majorly exists in AFAB humans or would you say it exists i…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 03:17 PM
1

Personally, I believe we should strive for a single-sex species through genetic manipulation, but until that solution could be implemented, this actually seems like it would solve a lot of problems. Whom would this serve? Humankind as a whole or just one portion of it (e.g. men)? You see, there is something called xenofeminism and the famous catchphrase which you could say embodies xenofeminism is "If nature is unjust, change nature", or more fully: "In the name of feminism, ‘Nature’ shall no lo…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 08:46 AM
1

Honestly, OP, I find completely misogynistic the fact that you would even want to implement something like this and support it. WTF?! I don't even think this is (A) right and (B) good AT ALL.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 08:40 AM
3

Honestly, I think that is hyperbole. We don't really have a methodology to truly gage how much each gender want sex or don't want it. A person can want it, but not act on it. A person could not really want it but be pressured to act on it. I absolutely agree with this! Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 08:21 PM
3

Yes, it is definitely frustrating to always see any sexist prejudice, sexist hatred, sexist discrimination, etc., being expressed towards anyone, but, hey, sometimes humans are bastards, so we've just got to try and change the world for more people to make a better tomorrow, I reason.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:36 AM
2

I saw while I was lurking on r/MensLib the other week that there was this post to do with this very thing which you're speaking about: a struggle to get the law changed.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 07:48 PM
2

I agree with you there. My reaction was more hypersensitivity on my part, having been accused falsely of being abusive and the fallout from that I take it you mean this is why you initially disagreed with me, no? I mean, because you answered me emotionally?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 05:14 PM
3

You can't reduce/prevent violent assaults through any legal means I wasn't saying that I believe doing it through the legal system would be either doable or even effective, so I don't know where you got this idea from. What we can do is legally presume innocence beyond a shadow of a doubt when accusations are made Hear, hear! I absolutely agree with you, but I don't see how this contradicts what I said before, unless I'm missing something or whatever. I think a good illustration is how many Blac…
/r/MensRights30/08/21 04:57 PM
2

Some people just suck, and everyone should have the right and ability to defend themselves, regardless of the sex of the aggressor, and/or the sex of the victim. This is a serious question: I'm seriously confused why you said this, as this implies that I said that one ought not to defend oneself or something, when I unequivocally did not say this. Can you please elucidate what you mean?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 04:00 PM
4

No, I don't believe you probably do, but, alas, far too often discourse on this matter does often turn into a nasty, messy debate where things like "[he or she] did it to me, so why ought I not be able to do it to [him or her]" with respect to physically violent retaliation. I think this is the wrong way of going about it. I think we need to pursue other ways to end physical violence as much as is doable and where we can't end it, I think we ought to seek to reduce it as realistically as possibl…
/r/MensRights30/08/21 03:58 PM
1

For a perspective on Indian judicial system biases, A high court judge said, Indian girls don’t indulge in carnal activities just for fun I think this may be predicated on notions of outdated, archaic, so-called 'proper' sexual conduct, sexual honour, and sexual ethics for a girl or a woman, which may posit that a 'properly feminine' woman or whatever would not just willingly and consensually give herself to any boy or man because she desires him and he desires her. I understand that some parts …
/r/MensRights30/08/21 03:54 PM
1

For a perspective on Indian judicial system biases, A high court judge said, Indian girls don’t indulge in carnal activities just for fun I think this may be predicated on notions of outdated, archaic, so-called 'proper' sexual conduct, sexual honour, and sexual ethics for a girl or a woman, which may posit that a 'properly feminine' woman or whatever would not just willingly and consensually give herself to any boy or man because she desires him and he desires her. I understand that some parts …
/r/MensRights30/08/21 03:54 PM
3

Oh, I understand the stakes are very, very high, especially since we're dealing with real-life humans and real-life situations, but, still, I think there is definitely something there. Equalising things is fine, but we've simply got to decipher where good equalisation ends and where bad equalisation starts, lest we be complicit in the reproduction of the very problem we're seeking to crush, oppose, and end.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 02:21 PM
1

You're referring to so-called 'British India', when Britain had an empire, I take it, no?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 01:07 PM
2

I don't know whether it is a matter of people or institutions, especially historic ones, which radically contribute to the moralisation and permitting of certain egregiousness going on. Yes, institutions are human-made and maintained in an array of ways through human production and human reproduction of them, but, still, I think this is very much a systematic problem which would need to be expunged, I reason.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 11:34 AM
14

I know this isn't really what your post is about, OP, but what I would love to see with respect to issues like this is less talk about equalising violent retaliation for women against men and men against women (the latter's being the more controversial of the two, of course), and a lot more talk about how we can work to realistically reduce all violent assaults across the board, whether that be violent crime that is woman-woman, man-man, woman-man, man-woman, or any other gendered configuration,…
/r/MensRights30/08/21 11:29 AM
0

In Contrapoints' video Men, I believe she says therein when quoting Warren Farrel from his book The Myth of Male Power that one one of men's greatest strengths but also one of the greatest weaknesses of men is being necessarily seen as strong, big, resilient, and strapping, totally willing and and able to take on the dog-eat-dog world; similarly, women's being seen as weak, meek, dainty, and in need of a superman to often or always swoop them from dangerous situations is also both a strength and…
/r/MensRights30/08/21 09:45 AM
3

Thanks! I'll definitely have to check this all out a little later. I do know a bit about things to do with the Asian continent, but I could definitely do with reading up more on a lot of it, not just this sort of thing. :)
/r/MensRights30/08/21 08:46 AM
4

Thank you for sourcing! I just like to be able to back up things I say, see, etc., with factual evidence (in this case, law that is on the books). I think the non-recognition of rape, sexual assault, and or sexual abuse does to some degree emanate from its being quite tabooed in some places, even in some liberal democratic countries, not just girls and women, but for boys and men, and other folks of other gender identities and gender modalities as well. This is why I think any anti-rape movement…
/r/MensRights30/08/21 08:45 AM
0

Seconded.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 08:30 AM
3

Why so?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 08:29 AM
36

Could you source this, please? I am not surprised this is the case, as I understand that in a lot of places on the Asian continent that a lot of men rape victims and survivors and a lot of men domestic abuse victims and survivors are not legally recognised or even protected under law which some may take for granted, although I can't currently substantiate this.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 08:24 AM
225

I don't know how Indian culture, other South Asian cultures, and other countries on the Asian continent operate with respect to women and the law to do with sexual abuse, sexual assault, rape, domestic abuse, etc., but do they believe that women are unable to commit crimes or something, especially against men? This is a serious question. I pose this question because I understand crime is so synonymous with men and maleness that it is almost unthinkable to reason that a girl or a woman can be a c…
/r/MensRights30/08/21 08:12 AM
5

Directed at any gender, I think the rationale of not attacking someone because they are perceived to be vunerable is absurd; similarly, I think attacking someone because they are perceived to be strong and buff is equally absurd.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:20 PM
74

The poor boy! This just absolutely sickens me. I feel so, so sorry for him. I feel like crying. Godbless you, sweetheart! It is for people like you who suffer in this abysmal way that we are struggling a better tomorrow, wherein no-one's bodily autonomy is violated because of any religious, social, cultural, or any other kinds of norms.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 05:03 PM
2

I think it is factually clear that all genders are affected, in theory and in practice to different degrees, etc., by rape, sexual assault, and sexual abuse, even if some demographics of people are more at risk than others of being assaulted and or abused sexually or raped.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:02 PM
5

Because of kyriarchal pressures and forces, I don't see how she can at all deny on factual grounds that people who are not girls or women are not or cannot be perpetrators of sexual abuse, sexually assault, and or rape against non-girls and non-women.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 11:56 AM
3

Ah, well, that's lovely to hear! It's a fabulous sub! :)
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:31 AM
5

I mean, the expression "boys will be boys" is a bit toxic and sometimes defends bad behavior, or is used as an excuse by a parent to not raise their kids properly. Personally, I have never liked the expression Boys will be boys, because, like you said, it often a way of just excusing poor behaviour on behalf of the boy or teenager who is doing it, which is simply wrong by nature. Likewise, using an expression like Girls will be girls which would operate similarly would also be very bad and negat…
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:30 AM
3

I also hasten to add that there is a great sub - r/Intactivism - that deals with the mutilation of the penile tissue, the vulval tissue, and the tissues of the sometimes-anomalous genitalia of some intersex people. Personally, I like the sub; it seems to be quite unbiased from what I have observed and I think it is an elemental sub.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:22 AM
3

It's sad truth that from the perspective of human society, being physically stronger is always a burden instead of any advantage. You get all sorts of responsibility without any compensation, on top of that you get all the hate instead. I think this is quite true, actually. The other day I was on r/AskTransgender and this man and I thereon were having a great conversation. Because it was pertinent to the thing to which I was responding of his thereon, he had revealed that he was trans. He spoke …
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:15 AM
1

I believe it is absolutely the case that Black men, Brown men, other non-White men, Latino men, Hispanic men, African-American men, and other men Afrodescendants around the world are most certainly negatively affected by the system of which you're speaking, OP, but I think this is because crime is often such a racialised and classed issue, one which is affected by a lot of intersecting entities of identity, including race-realist and racist 'science'/nonsense which is used to 'prove' the purport…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter