TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

whatevswhatevs Archive

View 2 posts and 57 comments by whatevswhatevs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm sure that's what you tell yourself, bud :3
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/14 07:05 PM
3

Because in addition to being sexist, he's incredibly stupid. Look at his posting history, the lack of critical thinking skills are astounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/14 03:03 PM
1

Yup! I met my SO on omegle and I told him alllll kinds of stuff about me I wouldn't have told a guy I met at school or work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/14 03:00 PM
7

I guarantee this guy's a douche
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/14 02:37 PM
4

I never considered the "add ons" that you described being a reason. Yeah I think some guys feel a lot of external social pressure when they're in a relationship, which can be draining. As a woman I actually feel this way as well sometimes, my boyfriend's family asks me a lot of personal questions for example. I only thought avoiding monogamy would be the reason. I'm sure that's the case for some people, there are lots of people who seem to be wired for nonmonogamy, the same way someone might be …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 04:53 PM
2

Ah okay, those topics are a lot more neutral than partner count and other things users have suggested. I would stay far away from incendiary topics like partner count for the reasons I mentioned previously. It's not pertinent to the sub at all and the responses would be meaningless because there's no way to prove the veracity of the responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 04:33 PM
0

Uhh..wat? Genders aren't "factual?" I understand that gender is a matter of personal identity that can vary from individual to individual with a strong, but not 100% correlation to biological sex, but that doesn't mean gender is a construct. Gender is the range of physical, biological, mental and behavioral characteristics pertaining to, and differentiating between, masculinity and femininity. Depending on the context, the term may refer to biological sex (i.e. the state of being male, female or…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 04:26 PM
1

Not trying to be snarky, but what's the point of a survey like this? People can say whatever they want, there's no way to know if it's accurate, which makes it meaningless. I wouldn't be surprised if some butthurt idiot intentionally manipulated the results.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 04:12 PM
5

In my experience I think a lot of guys are insistent on a casual situation at first as a form of self protection. They want to have sex and be intimate, but they don't want the cultural baggage that goes with a GF - relationships involve more than just two people when all your friends/family know about it, there are certain expectations and all of that. Men have bonding hormones too, and lots of them start to have feelings once we fuck a few times. My sexuality doesn't work that way, my feelings…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 04:06 PM
0

I disagree with you. I have no problem with you expressing your opinions, but what you're saying is not demonstrably factual. It's fine if you feel this is how the world works, but you can't prove it. You shouldn't expect anyone to take your opinions seriously if all you're going to do is wax poetic about your personal notions of the nature of masculinity/femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 03:56 PM
6

Every time I've entered into a casual relationship, it's been the guy who wanted to make things more serious, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 03:33 PM
5

Yeah, but saying femininity is "directionless" and masculinity is "driven" is not only sexist, it's a crock of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 03:26 PM
3

Lol send me a source that includes this "truly historical" definition of yours, because without one all you're doing is talking a whole bunch of shit. Maybe all I cited was the dictionary, but at least I backed my thoughts up. I'd love to see a definition of femininity that's broadly societally accepted (like a dictionary definition) that says femininity "lacks direction." Are you going to find one? Nope, because you're sexist, you're making all this shit up on the spot and spouting off like it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 03:05 PM
4

Yeahhh, no. Maybe that's your personal belief, but that's not what those words mean. Masculine: Having qualities or appearance traditionally associated with men, especially strength and aggressiveness. Just to be really clear: Strength - The quality or state of being strong, the power to move heavy weights or perform other physically demanding tasks. Aggression - Hostile or violent behavior or attitudes toward another; readiness to attack or confront. Neither of these things have anything to do …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 05:14 AM
7

I feel similarly, except about men. The problem with being turned on by novelty that there's a finite number of things I'm interested in sexually, and I/my partner can only experience those things for the first time once. You can't explore forever, eventually you're going to come to a point where you've tried everything you're interested in/turned on by. If novelty is the only thing that really gets you off or sparks intimacy between your and your partner, your ability to be satisfied has an exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 01:40 AM
11

You're falsely equating femininity with submissiveness. You can be feminine and "drive" a relationship, being dominant and being feminine aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 01:04 AM
0

Uh...okay. I have no idea what you're talking about, not a Huxley fan. My ideal definitely isn't someone who "seals off their emotions and soullessly ruts" though...ew.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/14 01:57 PM
1

Ah, that hasn't been my experience. I really don't like BDSM type kinks though and I don't think of sex as something that's "given" from one person to another or "done" by one person "to" another person.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 07:40 PM
0

Ah, I guess we have different perspectives then.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 06:02 PM
1

Lots of people don't want to feel used. If someone referred to me as a means to an end, I would feel used, which is why I think terms like "plate" or "getting pussy" are insulting and dehumanizing. It's not the actual words, it's the way of thinking behind them that insult me. For example, if a woman only wanted money from men and referred to guys taking her out on dates as 'free dinners,' isn't that insulting in a similar way?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 03:50 PM
4

Does it really bother you that much? I don't have casual sex, but if someone said "I'm getting pussy tonight" referring to me I'd be deeply offended and that person would no longer be around any part of me, let alone inside my pussy. I'm a person, not a warm hole. If someone you were with reduced who you are as a person to one specific means to an end, you wouldn't be offended or feel objectified?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:44 PM
1

I think there are a lot of RPers who get more attention over here than they do at TRP, so they're starting to favor this sub instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:07 PM
0

Calling someone a plate or referring to casual sex as "pussy" is dehumanizing in my opinion, especially if you wouldn't call that person plate/pussy to their face. You're fucking a person, why not think of them as such?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:58 PM
5

Now who's mad? You shouldn't say things you don't mean in a public forum if you don't want others to see them. I'm a person, your initial post was crass and vitriolic and I responded to it appropriately. Does my negative reaction surprise you? BTW, if you're going to accuse me of downvoting you I'd appreciate it if you'd prove it with a screenshot or some other kind of evidence. This thread is pretty popular and more than one person has taken note of your negativity.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 05:22 AM
1

An interesting thing about the chemistry with a dude I'm not in a relationship with is I have noticed very little correlation between it and objective (or, as close to it as we can get) good looks. That is interesting, I've noticed that I definitely don't have a 'type' when it comes to looks, I appreciate a wide variety of traits and my SOs haven't looked a thing alike. I'm willing to date people who 'aren't in my league' physically if everything else is compatible. I can get a little subby abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 05:17 AM
3

[–]FortunateBum [poäng dold] 2 minutes ago Not surprising. You're not a funny or clever drunk by the way, you're a mean one. I honestly don't know why anything I wrote was "mean". I didn't even know if you were a woman or man. Wrote that at the top. Why you personalized this all, I don't know. That you took everything so personally when I absolutely didn't mean it that way (and it was obvious) and then personally attacked me says more about you than it does about me. You know what I'm sick of? W…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 04:55 AM
1

No, not the kind of lust/"need" I feel for my SO, the OMG please stick it in desperate horniness only happens once the love hormones kick in for me. You could put some ridiculously hot man in front of me and I would definitely recognize and appreciate how hot he is, but I wouldn't want his dick inside me. On a base physical level though I have a high desire for orgasms and if I don't have an SO I just take care of myself frequently.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 04:40 AM
-2

sometimes I suspect you meet someone, the chemistry is there, you want them sexually and that's all there is to it. It's not like that for me. I tried having casual sex with partners I was physically attracted to but didn't have romantic chemistry with, and I just didn't enjoy those experiences. I don't think sex is all about ego validation or anything like that, but it's certainly a component for many people. I also enjoy getting lost in the raw physical pleasure of sex, but for me I only get t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 04:35 AM
6

For a woman, the longest you go without sex is what, months? Weeks maybe? Lots of guys go years without sex. I chose to go almost four years without sex, I broke up with my high school boyfriend at 19 and didn't fall in love again until I was 23. Before I decided to be celibate until I met someone I really connected with, I tried having casual sex with two different partners, I didn't enjoy either experience and decided that was enough casual sex for one lifetime. Every single relationship I eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 04:27 AM
0

What would the criteria be for fucking around?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:37 AM
0

I wonder if an extrovert and an introvert would experience casual sex differently/derive different benefits from having casual sex. Thanks for all your input!!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:37 AM
1

Why is sex not an egalitarian exercise? Is it because someone has to initiate it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:26 AM
0

Do you believe the reverse is also true?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:18 AM
2

If just standing next to some make me shivery and weak-kneed, the sex would probably be good, with or without love. Imo. This is fascinating because for me, that weak-kneed "ughh I need you inside me" feeling has never happened until I've fallen in love with a person. I definitely find people hot, but it tends to be across both genders even though I'm straight. I think lots of people are attractive but I don't actually want to have sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:13 AM
0

Do you think your extroversion is related to your attitudes about sex/your sexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:09 AM
0

If you read the other comment chains I've been participating in I think I've elaborated quite a bit, feel free to ask specific questions if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:07 AM
0

Interesting, thanks for your input!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:06 AM
0

Isn't it only a guage of your social standing if everyone knows about your sex life? I wouldn't want anyone knowing really anything about my sex life, my sexuality is private.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:05 AM
1

So if you were having sex with an unattractive woman, the physical sensation wouldn't be the same? Do you think it's because you'd be less aroused? What if you were blind, would you have sex strictly for the physical sensation of sex without being able to determine exactly what a partner looks like?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:55 AM
0

Pretty sure you're the only one being nitpicky about it, everyone else seems to understand what I'm getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:53 AM
1

Huh, this is interesting. Would you consider yourself an extrovert? I'm definitely introverted and in addition to not enjoying casual sex, I also wouldn't go out to a bar to laugh and drink with strangers, and would have to be persuaded to do the same with friends haha. For me the actual mechanics of sex isn't pleasurable enough to warrant having sex for the sake of sex. I'm guaranteed to cum if I masturbate but I've never been able to orgasm from casual sex. There's a large psychological compon…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:52 AM
2

Why does the ability to 'get sex' make you feel good? I could also have sex whenever I want, but that doesn't make me feel good about myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:46 AM
2

That's what I was trying to figure out, what the motivation would be if you lost the drive. So for you, the physical sensation of sex is pleasurable enough to have sex for the sake of sex, independent of your relationship to your partner? That's what's fascinating to me, as it's not my experience. I wasn't trying to say that you would definitely behave a certain way or anything like that, I was just thinking aloud.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:42 AM
2

Woah, simmer down. I wrote my post in like two minutes. You're reading wayyy too into this discussion. Please don't make insane assumptions like "the title of the thread seems like a very toxic mentality to have towards life in general", I'm just looking for perspectives that are different from my own, not trying to argue a point or write a dissertation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:39 AM
1

Is it the physical pleasure of casual sex that you enjoy or the ego validation or both? Have you always enjoyed casual sex, do you think it's an innate part of your sexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:31 AM
2

If you were able to turn off your sex drive, wouldn't your desire for meaningless sex diminish entirely after you turned it off? So the drive for casual partners would be totally eliminated, you probably wouldn't think to turn it on 'when you wanted to have sex' because the whole point of turning it off is to shut down the urge to have sex for the sake of sex. I think your desire to turn it on would only be sparked if you were aroused by someone in a nonsexual way, like in the case of falling in…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:29 AM
1

That doesn't really answer my question though, is casual sex worth the effort it takes for you to get it? Are you basically saying it doesn't take any effort if you're a well adjusted adult? Why do you use the term "plate" instead of friends with benefits or fuckbuddy?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:24 AM
-1

For you, there's a difference between wanting someone physically and being in love with them, right? So casual sex is a good way of validating your ego without going through the trouble of falling in love. For me, casual sex doesn't validate my ego because I only get that rush when I'm in love with the person providing the validation. I also never came when I had casual sex, so I wasn't physically satisfied either, which made the whole thing pointless for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:20 AM
4

I am completely and utterly into that specific man and that is the most intense sex to have, when there is no one else on earth you would rather be doing this with, no one else on earth you want to turn on and please more than this one right here. It's impossible to be closer to another human being than having them inside you, making eye contact, being able to hear and feel and see every move and breath etc. and for whatever reason there's really nothing nicer, imo, than that. I totally agree wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:10 AM
1

Ah, so you get a lot of ego gratification/validation from sex, even if you don't particularly care about the person you're having sex with? For me, I don't care if any random dude thinks I'm hot or wants me, I only feel that rush of power/fulfillment if it's coming from someone I want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:07 AM
2

Huh, I hadn't considered this. I was pretty focused on the physical pleasure aspect when I wrote this post because I was thinking about my own experiences with casual sex which haven't been pleasurable and was wondering if it was just totally different for some guys. Thanks for the insight!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 12:21 AM
2

Thanks for answering my question. Just going based off the summary in the sidebar which says TRP is about sexual strategy and the TRP's mods words, he's always ranting about how the focus has shifted in TRP from sexual strategy to other things like relationships. Do you think casual sex is just as pleasurable as sex in a LTR?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 12:19 AM
2

If there were a way for you to turn your sex drive off/on at will, would you prefer to not have the drive on unless you wanted it for a specific person, like in a LTR for example?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 12:13 AM
2

Lol, isn't a baby also a little human? Hello... The priority shift is a personal fear of mine, it doesn't actually have anything to do with my husband's feelings. I love my husband so much I can't imagine loving anyone more than I love him, but I'm sure I'd love a baby more. What I'm not sure of is whether I'd want that level of intensity in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 03:57 PM
4

Lol...uhh...babies need breastmilk (or a liquid diet of formula as a substitute) to survive infancy. They have underdeveloped muscles and a tongue thrusting reflex that helps with nursing which makes eating solid food impossible until around 3.5 to 4 months at the very youngest, even chewed up food would be too much before then.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 03:53 PM
5

I know guys who are baby crazy too, my SO has always been more excited about the idea of kids than I am. Also, I'd be absolutely devastated if the father of my two month old child told me he wasn't emotionally attached to him/her and was just doing what needed to be done to help me out...I really hope that's not a common thing, it's your child. I understand you weren't given the advantage of being able to grow her inside your body and give birth her, but she's still part of you. If anything, one…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 03:46 PM
1

http://www.redditlog.com/snapshots/489149
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 05:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter