TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

whats_a_farger Archive

View 1 post and 79 comments by whats_a_farger on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

whats_a_farger/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:19 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

No. I'm literally saying show me a feminist (any feminist) who openly condones this behavior for the "true Scotsman" argument flaw to work.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 04:47 PM
–

For that to work, you have to have a Scotsman in the first place. Wild accusations that feminists would condone this behavior does not a Scotsman make. This kind of comment is typical of MRAs (see what I did there? YOU'RE now the Scotsman). Use your head.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 04:03 PM
2

We're focusing on the irresponsible lack of jail time, right?
/r/MensRights21/03/14 09:00 PM
-1

You people? What people? I'm not trolling. What's with the hostility? I don't understand.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:56 PM
3

HAHA, why not? How are men supposed to attract women then? are we just slabs of meat for them to pick out at the market? Who would be better able to answer these questions?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:18 PM
-1

Do you consider third wave feminism relevant?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:21 PM
1

"In honor of black history month, McDonald's has agreed to give black people a 25% discount on all orders between 10 - 2, but you must ask for the discount." Can you imagine? It's a failure any way you look at it. How humiliating would having to ask for the discount be?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:01 PM
-1

You may be being downvoted because this isn't a men's rights issue. It belongs in /r/dating or /r/askwomen
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:57 PM
2

There's people who really think that men won't get boners if they don't want to? My entire puberty years want to slap those people silly (this is a joke, I am not violent).
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:55 PM
2

I'm happy/enraged about the provided links.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:46 PM
2

This is ridiculous. None of these guys are being rude, they're just sitting. Like normal.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:45 PM
2

I had no idea dudes just..... sitting was that big of a fucking issue. I'm stuck between finding it absurd and being profoundly frustrated.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:44 PM
3

I think they're attaching waaaaay too much to this. It's fun because it's irrelevant. It's like a tumblr called "Dudes in Yellow Pants." Silly. Who could find offense to that?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:16 PM
2

link?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:12 PM
15

Am I the only one who noticed the [humour] tag?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:28 PM
4

That's the first "fun fact" I've seen that was actually fun.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:36 PM
2

I read this article twice and I don't understand. It's in poor taste, but not misogynistic. Why would a feminist in particular be upset with it?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 10:23 PM
2

Troll.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 10:20 PM
2

No. You're avoiding the fucking question again by restating it in your terms. I want you to say that you think it's fair that it's solely the choice of the female to keep a baby. I want you to say that it's fair that depending on her decision, a man still must provide child support. I want you to say it's fair for a female to tell her partner that she's using birth control and lie about it with no legal consequences, but if a man pokes holes in a condom, there are. *EDIT: And if you can't say yo…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 10:09 PM
2

Are you going to answer the question or worry about syntax? Also, it depends on where you live.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:14 PM
3

Do you honestly think that's fair? That it's solely the choice of the female to keep a baby, but she can then charge child support? If you aren't prepared for the consequences of sex, don't have it. Unless you're a female, apparently in your eyes, then there are no consequences. The female can trick a man into impregnating her with no consequences, the female can decide to keep or not to keep the baby with no consequences.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:43 PM
1

"What shall we do about the Atheists, Pope Baby?" "Waaa-aaaaaa..." "Pope Baby needs his divine Pope bottle."
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:04 PM
1

According to that, that feminist who was freaking out about movember, saying that it was sexist and discriminatory, was correct.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 07:36 PM
1

So if it's a program designed for girls, it's inherently at the detriment of boys?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:56 PM
1

So if I understand... You're saying that the fact that an introductory science program for little girls exists discrimination?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:29 PM
1

I am surprised too! I wasn't expecting a program like this. When I was in grade school, I was in an advanced science program, a book club and introductory trigonometry all wrapped into one "gifted" program (I'm glad they stopped using THAT terminology). I was the only male there, including the instructor. I would have loved to have been in a course like this.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:27 PM
1

BEST Camp was established in 2004 with its curriculum and structure modeled on the highly successful Girls and Science (GAS) Camp Where does it mention that it's a companion to this program? How in hell is that "effectively" a co-ed program? Imagine the reverse situation. Would if be acceptable to feminists? Of course not. So it isn't acceptable to us. I can imagine several: Girl Scouts, Women's Basketball, Women's Hockey, etc. All modeled after the already established male version. Pretty sure …
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:16 PM
1

....and?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 09:40 PM
6

If a trans man wants to be a postal worker, I don't see any problem with that.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 09:36 PM
1

http://www.bestsummercamp.org/
/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:30 PM
2

http://www.bestsummercamp.org/
/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:29 PM
-2

www.expandingyourhorizons.org looks like an organization directed specifically toward girls and science. Are you honestly offended?
/r/MensRights07/01/14 10:31 PM
1

What a strange person.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 09:37 PM
1

Other people get to expires Someone doesn't HAVE to be stupid, but here we are.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 04:42 PM
2

Honestly, I'd rather teach her how to be a nuclear engineer.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 03:16 PM
5

Are you going to start posting child porn to me, too? Whaaaaaaaaaaaa??
/r/MensRights26/12/13 02:53 PM
1

I haven't seen Black Swan. Is it a date movie? It looks like a psychological thriller.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:15 PM
1

I see what you mean. If you use the test on movies that are already "date movies," that makes sense. But a film could pass the test and not be a date movie at all. That's what I was saying.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 03:43 PM
0

Oooooooh. So you're saying OP meant "the group responsible" as in "women."
/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:15 PM
1

If that's the case, I think it fails even in that regard, right?
/r/MensRights07/11/13 04:12 PM
4

The group responsible... What? They said they didn't know who did it.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:43 PM
6

I understand your viewpoint, and while that may be true, I was looking for ANY source regarding that claim. The information had to be put into anonlymouse's name somehow.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:24 PM
9

The Vintermann Test For a film to pass the Vintermann Test, it must satisfy the following requirements: It must have at least two men in it. No man in the film is expected to overcome adversity. No man in the film is expected to make any personal sacrifices for a female in the film. *EDIT: I misspelled your username.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:20 PM
15

Um... source on that? Wikipedia doesn't indicate that at all.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:28 PM
1

Oh, I understand now. That's pretty gross...
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:03 AM
0

wut
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:49 PM
12

Particularly relevant.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:18 PM
1

Thanks for supplementing your sentence structure. The damage has been done, though. I must see a neurologist quickly.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:26 PM
1

Have you been married?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:16 PM
0

the average women is well above average Brain... exploding...
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:15 PM
3

I think what bsutansalt is saying is that, in broad terms, work that is traditionally masculine will leave men feeling masculine. Men who are exuding masculinity naturally attract women who are attracted to masculinity.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:49 PM
3

I could see a Dalek taking 27 hours a week to do housework. I mean, they only have a couple tools and that one suction cup thingy. They end up EXTERMINATING the dishes most of the time, which is costly.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:42 PM
2

Eggs... Term... Men... Ate...
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:06 PM
1

Oh... so you're saying it's "housework." I still don't see it taking 27 hours a week. I mean, that's almost 4 hours a day. Is this Mr. Burns' house? Eggs.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 09:45 PM
4

27!?!?!!? 27 hours in a week!?!? What the fuck could be taking so long?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 09:37 PM
3

I'd like to see the actual quote, what she actually said blaming this on being a woman. They quoted her throughout the entire article, but not at that part. Red flag. What I'm wondering is if she's contributing the attention to her gender or the fact that the attention is negative to her gender. She may have said something else entirely and was misrepresented here.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 09:01 PM
12

"The degree to which activists generalize problems matter." This is my favorite line from this. As Judge Judy says "Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining."
/r/MensRights04/11/13 08:18 PM
3

grammar'd!
/r/MensRights03/11/13 07:17 AM
22

Dude. These three sentences legitimately made me tear up. That is so awful.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:34 AM
1

Why is it anus first, genitals second?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:00 PM
2

Thank you for finding that for me. So yeah, why was she or Corey or that other guy not imprisoned? I mean, if it's a second degree felony period, and second degree felonies are sentenced with "not more than 20 years or less than 2 years" imprisonment... WTF?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:35 PM
2

She got 10 years probation. The first guy in this article, Corey Rivera, got 5 years probation. Is that fair? There's not a lot of detail regarding the incident with Paul Forrest, the guy who got sentenced to 2 years in prison, so maybe the circumstances were different. Since the age of consent in Texas is 17, I don't think it's fair that anyone get sent to prison. The only thing I found regarding Improper Relationship With a Student was this penal code, which says it's a second degree felony. W…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 02:43 PM
3

it is no longer for the support of cancer research but a feminist expression of power over us... Um... what? That sentence is as loony as the article this person is tearing apart.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 02:12 PM
1

BLONDE?!?!?!?!
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:06 PM
-1

If this is indeed sexist (which, whatever, I think it's benign), it's sexist toward women and men. It victimizes women.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 08:02 PM
44

So... What happens when she turns 17? She'll need to change the URL.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 02:42 PM
3

Changing my username to now_i_know_what_a_farger_is_and_ew
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:53 PM
-1

In the US, the legal age is 18. *wording
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:36 PM
1

seconded
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:32 PM
1

That's good, but men aren't defined by their relationship to women, right?
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:55 AM
2

By all means. I just thought it was refreshing to hear a woman I respect show respect to men's struggles.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:53 AM
2

I'm not trying to be dismissive, or anything. Sometimes, though, you gotta pick your battles. It could be possible for the MRM to be known for hyper-sensitivity like Feminism is; but why, when it's already known for using facts and logical arguments?
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:12 AM
16

Who cares?
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:29 AM
6

Do you understand the difference between an homage and a parody?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:08 PM
3

Upvotes for font knowledge.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 05:41 PM
15

Toward the end, you can see the fear in his eyes, poor guy. There is a HUGE difference between talking shit, and getting the shit beat out of you by a fucking mob. I hope he not only sues the old couple, but the stadium. If that's possible.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:59 AM
1

As am I. Like I said in a previous comment, I am circumcised and have not had a single bad experience because of it. That being said, there's no way I would ever make that decision for my son if he were an infant and I'm in 100% agreement with you. Are we questioning Judaism entirely by saying an infant can't have this decision made for them, though? Or is it perfectly acceptable for a Jewish male to wait until they're old enough to understand? Can we get a Jew to answer this? What I'm saying ul…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 06:29 PM
0

Correct me if I'm wrong. Jews get circumcised as an identification of God's chosen people. It is a requirement of Judaism. If one truly believes that God himself commands that their son get circumcised, then of course they're going to do so. It would be a requirement for his son's spiritual health. So they would feel that responsibility to see to the well being of their children. I am not a Jew, so I in no way claim to understand fully.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:49 PM
8

I'm a circumcised male, 32. Although I'm perfectly content with my penis, I had no option. I had no choice. That decision about my body was made for me. Circumcision itself isn't what people are against, (like I said, I'm fine) it's the circumcision of infants. Take also into consideration the fact that IT COULD GO VERY WRONG and it becomes less of a harmless thing and more of a no-brainer-don't-do-it-to-your-children thing. All that being said, I'm also a Christian. I have a faith. I understand…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter