TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

whelponry Archive

View 4 posts and 406 comments by whelponry on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

If there's any justice, no school district will ever allow her to teach again, misdemeanor or not. But that would actually be the right thing to do.
/r/PussyPass02/12/19 10:44 PM
8

/r/pussypass
/r/MensRights02/12/19 10:30 PM
1

It's promoted for shock value and to sell ads. We need to limit our reaction to social media and realize it's all a ruse by people wanting to fracture our society and destroy the culture.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 06:36 AM
67

By administering hormone-suppressing drugs, the boy's genitals will never reach sexual maturity and they won't even be able to reconstruct a working vagina if the full transition surgery is performed later in life because the penis will be "stuck" at pre-puberty size. This is a fact that the radical transgender activists refuse to acknowledge or make mention of. IDGAF what you do as an adult, but imposing that choice on a child without consent is wrong in the same way circumcision is, albeit wit…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 06:33 AM
4

Twitter is straight-up chaos. It's a highly biased platform that needed to lose its Section 230 protections a long time ago and see Jack Dorsey and his leadership team in federal prison. The putrid bile on that platform should be avoided at all costs. It, like most social media, literally manipulates people into anger and retaliation that pushes ad revenue.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 06:24 AM
10

And don't forget to queue up the Title IX complaint against her and the college for anti-male discrimination. There's already enough there for a complaint.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 06:16 AM
2

This is the same SJW madness that has plagued so many movie and TV franchises. It's all a coordinated effort and utterly destroys the original creators' intent.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:34 AM
4

It's also to change the rules constantly to cause confusion and non-compliance thereby. They're all students of the insidious Frankfurt School.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:23 AM
2

If you're in a college that receives any federal funding, file a Title VI complaint against the professor. Start using the system against them and make them think twice before spewing their racist hatred.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:21 AM
6

Yuri Bezmenov used the term "social justice" in his now-famous interview back in the 80s and talked about how radical communists had infiltrated educational institutions in the US. He practically predicted everything that's going on now, but that came from his experience as a KGB officer working in foreign countries. How many more people have to die or suffer as a result of the horrendous disease of totalitarian state supremacy for the sake of a failed ideal?
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:16 AM
4

After what happened to Justina Pelletier, anyone with children should avoid even visiting the People's Republic of Massachusetts at all costs. It's unbelievable that someone in rehab would have anything more than supervised visitation of their children, much less custody. It's what the kids are experiencing that may very well cause this cycle to repeat, but I believe this is exactly why these judges do what they do.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 10:55 PM
79

Doubleplusungood!
/r/MensRights11/01/19 10:48 PM
1

UK is one-party recording permission, so let him record ASAP. Wish him strength and good luck, hope it all works out for him, and let us know how it all turns out.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 12:32 AM
5

Tell your friend to lawyer up immediately. There may be criminal coercion in this situation, meaning that the people who run this internment camp of a "parenting class" need to be arrested. There may also be a tort due to intentional infliction of emotional distress, particularly when there is no evidence of abuse documented anywhere. If your friend is in a state that allows for two-party recording, he should secretly record these group sessions in their entirety. Only on the advice of his attor…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:20 AM
3

All it does is cause men to disappear like this guy. You want something or nothing?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 03:57 PM
4

Also chiming in to bring up another topic on this subject, and that is potential sexual dysfunction in men after a radical prostatectomy. OP and the article are correct in saying that early detection makes prostate cancer very highly curable. Many men have already had this surgery and it's important for us to acknowledge that there are a substantial number of those men who have lost part of or the entirety of their sexual function. This affects their self-esteem, their sexual and romantic relati…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 10:58 PM
1

A stopped clock is right twice a day...
/r/MensRights22/01/17 03:22 PM
13

Michelle Rempel is sexist. There is no debate on this. That she would bring something like this up is as a total non sequitur is precisely the type of thing that someone who is sexist against men and would take advantage of such outrage. In fact, it is also taking advantage of a false and continually perpertrated stereotype of men that men supposedly believe women are incapable of math. Finally, I despise the MSM for once again not only failing to call out these points but also for falsely perpe…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 07:36 PM
1

If he wants to bring it up after he graduates, I think that's ok too. I just wouldn't expect him to be accepted back for further studies without some sort of fight.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 03:47 PM
3

I am going to, with a lot of regret, agree with this and recommend to OP to not bring this matter up unless done so anonymously. The goal here should be to obtain a passing grade and minimize the interaction with this professor in the future. Professors unfortunately have enormous discretion in assigning grades. Even if there is no opportunity for anything to be subjectively graded (e.g. a multiple choice exam), that professor can warn other colleagues about a particular student. I have personal…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 10:12 PM
1

Here's what really bothers me about this article: this is based on one SJW writing in a student newspaper expressing her opinion. It is clickbait, plain and simple. Of course it's complete statist nonsense to prevent a successful lawyer like Marie Henein from speaking at that institution. The SJWs had a preconceived notion of Jian Ghomeshi's guilt and that was shattered the day of his very correct not guilty verdict. Because of this, they will try literally anything to demonstrate how wrong ever…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 10:00 PM
29

If the radfems and SJWs hadn't taken over the discussion with their constant and shrill complaints, this girl would've been in handcuffs before there was even a trial. I guarantee there was almost no investigation of her side of this story by the police who may have been able to get her to admit this through sufficient questioning and obtaining details from her.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 09:42 PM
5

She's a sexist man-hater and can go fuck herself with a cactus. If she gave a fuck about people she'd do the right thing and accept gender-neutral services with whatever financial consequence it would have for her. Her livelihood isn't worth men continuing to suffer.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 11:23 PM
4

Drinking Stella That's the other crime right there...
/r/MensRights15/11/16 11:15 PM
3

That's why he needs to sue. The venomous filth emanating from Clementine Ford has to stop, and I believe this time she bit off more than she can chew. It would be sweet justice for her and her employer go down in flames over this considering she is a huge hypocrite for posting so much misandry.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 11:14 PM
2

Thirdwave has nothing to do with equality. ...and everything to do with revenge against men for perceived past wrongs.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:36 PM
1

The choice will come when this country learns not to continue to assert poorly thought out foreign policy decisions in countries where the culture demands either a dictatorship or all-out tribalism. I don't like Assad or the deceased Gaddafi, but at least they kept these radicals in check for the most part. The exception is the salafist psychopaths in Saudi who are promoting very radical schools of thought abroad including in Europe, although we're caught between them and the Islamofascist regim…
/r/MensRights08/11/16 05:10 PM
3

Too much going on in this one, but I'm going to take a stab at a few comments: The fact that a religious court holds sway over a majority of Jews who are not religious is an insane violation of their freedom of conscience. The woman should be able to petition a court for divorce independently of her husband, and vice-versa. From the article: “It’s really shameful that this is the only way to solve the terrible plight of this miserable woman, by incarcerating or confiscating the passport of her f…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 10:56 PM
2

They need to sue the false accuser as well to send a message to other false accusers that this bullshit won't be tolerated. I would name her but I don't want my account banned by the SJWs that run this shithole of a site. You can easily run a search for "real name of UVA accuser" and look at the Encyclopedia Dramatica page. It looks like she got married last year with a guy that I can only think might be a cuck and/or a complete moron.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 12:43 PM
5

And Wikipedia will never get a cent of donation from my pocket as long as they allow bullshit like this to go on. This is only a small example of their numerous biases.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:31 PM
9

And all that racist/sexist spew straight from the mouth of a rapist
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:24 PM
4

She is a truly evil piece of filth, ought to spend about twenty years at ADX Florence and forfeit everything she owns to this guy and his kids for what she did.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 10:53 PM
1

No wonder he lives in Georgia now. I feel really bad for this guy.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 10:51 PM
13

But outright censorship, where you run the guy out of Dodge? Jesus, that's frightening. No, that's totalitarianism. From the Wikipedia page on totalitarianism - the six defining characteristics: Elaborate guiding ideology. Single mass party, typically led by a dictator. System of terror, using such instruments as violence and secret police. Monopoly on weapons. Monopoly on the means of communication. Central direction and control of the economy through state planning. This is pretty much your av…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:47 PM
1

They didn't even have life imprisonment without parole as a sentence until about ten years ago. There was always some loophole in a sentence to give someone a chance to get out of prison. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:51 PM
1

More like a succubus...
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:45 PM
6

That's why we have to call them out at every turn, in every way possible. Unfortunately it normally results in yelling and screaming by the other side and all sorts of further anti-male sexism and false accusations, but we need to be capturing that too.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:42 PM
6

That subreddit is one of the biggest cesspools on this site. Salon is just an echo chamber for the statist radfem left. Taking anything at face value from them is about as dumb as sticking a fork in a toaster.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 10:45 PM
2

"Lost everything" What a fucking lie. They did it to fuck you over.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 12:16 AM
1

If you control language by redefining words and you control people and what they think. Information control and Newspeak.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 12:15 AM
5

Better to call it female-dominated statism, rooted in ignorance. Whatever you call it, this feminist bullshit needs to stop pronto.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 12:00 AM
5

Notice how she got extra stressed out at the end and gave a big ol' toke on that cigarette to compensate. I mean, what's the point in getting so stressed out and stopping and complaining about a public protest that you disagree with when you can just drive away?
/r/MensRights17/10/16 09:06 PM
3

It is sheer neanderthal-level thinking to allow corporal punishment in a high school. It simply doesn't have the intended deterrent effect on kids of this age and would only serve to create resentment at best and a risk of retaliatory violence at worst. That this policy is applied only to boys is even more ludicrous to be sure, and as you suggest there are other more effective ways to deal with disciplinary problems. Nothing worse than spending a day of detention inside a room by yourself or bei…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 09:51 PM
2

We are witnessing the fall of civilization one politically correct idea at a time. I'm all for equal opportunity. What I'm not for is equal outcome. There's a big difference. And where are all these SJWs when it comes to the nursing profession? There's a high paying profession that has a severe lack of men. Yet I don't recall ever hearing a complaint from men that they can't get a job in that field because of discrimination. I'm sure it happens in isolated cases, but it's not systematic as is su…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 07:55 PM
2

You mean like she owned up to the fact that she baited men with anti-male comments, yet when she gets the same comments back that she deletes her anti-male comments and posts the responses? This piece of flaming dogshit excuse for a person needs an attitude adjustment and a dirty sock stuffed in her mouth. That the SMH gives this any airtime says plenty about how legitimate it is as a source of information.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 07:49 PM
2

Because it's neutral and non-offensive. Personally, I'm surprised they haven't switched to comrade. But the way things are going, I'm sure it'll be soon.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:45 PM
4

I'll capitulate: Old me: "Excuse me sir, could I get a half pound of the smoked turkey breast thinly sliced please?" New me: "YOU! Half pound of smoked turkey breast thinly sliced ASAP." There. Gender neutral. Fuck you Asswholefoods.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:44 PM
4

The same reason the UK capitulates to accepting Sharia courts even though they are effectively against women's fundamental rights, i.e. pandering to the loudest and most obnoxious voices rather than institute an equal application of law to all citizens regardless of their background. It's so mind-boggling how bad it's become over in Europe in general but the UK is really stretching the limits of reason now, especially when two groups with literally opposite goals both get their way.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:39 PM
4

But I fear Australia is a lost cause of political correctness and third-wave radical feminism. It's how Turpentine Ford gets away with the shit that she does. Men are slowly being full-cucked in Australia one regulation and court ruling at a time.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:35 PM
2

Wow. The director finally bowed down to the bloody Constitution. Is he aware the Constitution is not optional. It's like, law, even. Kid you not. True enough, but remember that the people behind all of these SJW rabblerousers and their insane policies are the same ones that want to cement state control of every aspect of a person's life. They will reinterpret the constitution as they see fit, equal protection and due process be damned. Make the process so difficult and time consuming to navigate…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:32 PM
3

Nah, this isn't Hillary. Hillary is actually quite shrewd and adept at garnering favor from her supporters, though horrendously corrupt and fake. This one is an undisciplined, angry moron manipulated by the very group she claims to represent and has no intention of convincing anyone of any point beyond calling a cop or the nearest psychiatric hospital for her. Probably a dentist too if we're being realistic.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:58 PM
1

Why would anyone call a man who is defending his fellow man from hideous horrible woman a bully? Because we are subconsciously subjected to these types of ideas every day and many of us parrot these ideas without subjecting any critical thought towards them. It's the same type of thinking that got Gregory Elliott charged and almost convicted simply for speaking out against a feminist who had doxxed and campaigned against the creator of a game with every company in his home town.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 05:03 PM
3

It isn't the election I'm worried about. It's what happens no matter who wins. But mark my words: if Hillary wins, men and boys will be relegated to second-class citizens.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:54 PM
3

Isn't it convenient that the media forgot how Clinton claimed that oral sex wasn't sex during his testimony nearly two decades ago? Do a search for "Clinton-Lewinsky Effect" and you'll find how attitudes changed very quickly around that time. Now, shamelessly, they subconsciously reinforce stereotypes against boys and men through a fucking cartoon. This whole world is fucking backwards.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:53 PM
24

It's a mixture of 1984 and Brave New World, sprinkled with pre-John Galt Atlas Shrugged. Give the kids a mobile phone, an internet connection, a FB account and some games, and wrap them around your finger as you otherwise wish. Gonna quote this very relevant quote again from Atlas Shrugged: “Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we …
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:44 PM
2

Knowing they'd be recorded would tip them off and put them on good behavior. The point is to catch them when they least expect this type of activity. These feminists and their supporters have no regard for consistency of their own rules and will do whatever it takes to cover these issues up.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 11:08 PM
4

I say he goes one step further and records the whole thing to post a criticism of it point-by-point, provided he lives in a state where that is permissible. So basically, everywhere except for CA, CT, IL, MD, MA, MI, MT, NV, NH, PA, and WA. He should also ask provocative questions and call out any inequality. If questioned, he should threaten a Title IX complaint. I would love to watch these deluded feminists squirm at their own logical inconsistencies.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 01:27 PM
3

This is one of the most shameful things in this country. Veterans who faithfully served, risked their lives and in some cases came back seriously and permanently injured are being systematically marginalized by the VA system, with greatly disproportionate negative effects to men. We really need it cleaned up.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 01:22 PM
1

Real equality is not a one-way valve. But the effective definition of equality in the context of third-wave feminism is, and that is what we're talking about here. I think the vast majority of MRAs are actually pro-equality in the literal sense. What is becoming more apparent to me is that a core tenet of third-wave feminism is to enact revenge against men for sexism in the past. They want men to "feel that sting" even though they have gone far past equality by any reasonable measure and have ha…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 01:02 PM
1

Well I will admit that Amy Schumer, Lena Dunham and similar scum do live in another universe but somehow inhabit ours simultaneously. Not sure that that qualifies as faster than light though.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 11:19 PM
4

Every time they start a campaign to ask for donations I laugh. If they had any impartiality, then I would gladly donate. Until that happens, roughly sometime between now and when we discover faster than light travel, they can go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:41 PM
19

The first thing that needs to be done is to repeal the Department of Education's "Dear Colleague" letter of 2011 regarding Title IX enforcement on preponderance of evidence. It's now abundantly clear that this policy has resulted in needless litigation, disruption of the education process for countless male students, become fuel for the SJWs, and disrupted the overall academic discourse that once existed at the college level. This is the only way the current insanity will end. As for SJWs in gen…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:35 PM
3

What's shocking to me is the capitulation to fundamentalist Islam. From accepting Sharia courts that are a complete affront to equal rights, to not serving traditional pork dishes in Western and Northern Europe so as to not offend the new arrivals, it is cultural cuckoldry at its worst.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 09:48 PM
1

Well I'm sorry that you and your fellow UK citizens are subject to this. I worry profoundly for the future of Europe. I understand why so many people voted Brexit even though I think the best outcome was some kind of middle ground (i.e. free trade zone, Schengen for citizens, much less meddling of Druncker and Brussels in the affairs of member countries in general and with immigration in particular). Smartest thing you ever did was keep the pound, by the way. It's so strange...once upon a time, …
/r/MensRights04/10/16 09:44 PM
3

OP, you are witnessing the result of an enormous lie, and that is that Europe must take care of these people. You may already know that a few of the European elite, led by George Soros, are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to attempt to implement the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan of eliminating borders and culture. The purpose of this is to create a desperate situation that will allow the elites to take additional control of what is happening in Europe. Soros has paid for organizations to put …
/r/MensRights04/10/16 09:09 PM
6

I'll tell you what right you have to tell a woman not to circumcise her son...the right for that baby not to contract herpes and die. In any event, if I was OP I would've retorted with the FGM argument and accuse her of being sexist, tell the guy who told me I have an entitlement complex that he's a cucked beta male, and walked out giving the middle finger to the whole lot of them while laughing.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 08:41 PM
5

The Washington Post has 20 reporters scouring every known source of media and every known affiliated individual with Trump to dig dirt up on him. The MSM in general is scrambling to find any dirt on Trump that they can in the next few weeks. Don't be shocked at these leaps of logic, especially when they are Hillary supporters. Personally, I don't like any of the major candidates this year, but at least the MSM has openly revealed how totally illegitimate it is. Maybe people will finally start qu…
/r/MensRights29/09/16 06:58 PM
2

Well, the goombas do look like little shitlords with legs, literally, so there's at least that...
/r/MensRights20/09/16 12:05 AM
7

Syndrome's quote from The Incredibles sums this situation up nicely: Oh, I'm real. Real enough to defeat you! And I did it without your precious gifts, your oh-so-special powers. I'll give them heroics. I'll give them the most spectacular heroics anyone's ever seen! And when I'm old and I've had my fun, I'll sell my inventions so that everyone can be superheroes. *Everyone can be super! And when everyone's super...no one will be...* Of course, at that point, why even bother? I'm glad ACT is call…
/r/MensRights20/09/16 12:04 AM
10

You're goddamn right!
/r/MensRights19/09/16 04:30 PM
5

I'm lovin' it!®
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/16 02:25 PM
2

17 year old boys will often stick it in anything. Unfortunately, you can wield tremendous power against them when you're in a position of trust like that and the adult should know better, but of course no jail time because of her chromosomes. OTOH, a male teacher just got 10 years in Arizona for the same thing.
/r/PussyPass19/09/16 02:20 PM
32

/r/pussypass !!!
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:18 PM
1

The saddest part is that he commits suicide because of the false accusations. Yet as sad as this was, my cynical side practically expected in the UK. This witch hunt mentality is actually a cultural issue in the UK, as many men who are seen with their own children are reported by people for suspected child abduction.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:03 PM
3

The statists have won another victory. They never wanted people to have a community. They wanted total dependence on the state for all of their needs and for people to be paranoid in their suspicions of others, particularly when charity is involved and particularly if a man is engaged in such an activity of caring. The idiot who tore the teddy bear apart to see if it contained something nefarious is probably the same type of idiot who would call the cops on a kid's roadside lemonade stand. This …
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:58 PM
3

There is zero deterrent effect in these light sentences. The courts in the UK are absolutely out of control when it comes to punishment of offenders. Once again, being a victim of crime is useful to politicians and police agencies who will stand on the heads of the victims to gain power when the real solution is hard time for the perpetrators. Even worse, defending himself would have likely gotten him charged, because we can't have anyone but the government "help" you out on their terms. I hope …
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:54 PM
12

It's the judge's fault for not sentencing her to more. That is who is really responsible here. Hopefully the prosecution appeals the sentence to someone who actually cares about children's welfare and deterring other people from doing this because 4.5 months will never deter others committing the same crime.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:42 PM
11

We seem to be hardwired to protect women from everything, even their own bad behavior. And THAT is a big reason why the SJWs are winning, why /r/pussypass strikes again in this particular case, and why we need to change these attitudes by challenging these narratives at every opportunity.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:37 PM
1

I seem to be saying this a bit too often lately, but /r/pussypass strikes again...
/r/MensRights14/09/16 04:16 PM
40

Ingrained from a young age by society, media and schools to be a cuckold. Reinforce the message that it's ok to be a male and they don't need to apologize for that no matter what the age of the person saying it.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 04:14 PM
8

Probably judgment-proof. Even if they sue her, she'll probably just declare bankruptcy and they'll see barely a fraction of the money they spent on that child. All the more reason to revoke the /r/pussypass and put her in prison for at least 2-3 years. That would, of course, require actual justice.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 10:52 PM
1

I'd rather have her live in disgrace so that people in the community know who she is and shun her at every turn, after a long prison sentence and being stripped of every item of value to compensate the victim.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 10:50 PM
5

This is done purposely. An educated and informed populace would oust the current political duopoly and overthrow the feminist SJW mafia in a heartbeat. You'd never see this nonsense again. No lifetime alimony, nor most men losing custody of their kids, nor the other injustices we so frequently read about here. It would just be taken care of to be replaced by actual equal opportunity.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 10:28 PM
2

/r/pussypass
/r/MensRights09/09/16 10:23 PM
1

Hmmm...that's a funny way to spell fucking deluded psychopathic bitch, since we are talking about Mary Koss and all...
/r/MensRights08/09/16 08:36 PM
3

That actually is a huge number of mental professionals in general. Their therapy is largely steeped in helping others.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 08:35 PM
3

Gender politics and agendas pertaining thereto
/r/MensRights08/09/16 08:33 PM
1

I think it's clear from their comments that they were childless, emotionally attached after such a length of time, and didn't want to lose their children. It blinded them to the awful impact this situation had on the biological father.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 08:02 PM
28

I want to see criminal charges against the mother and the adoption agency employees involved in this for human trafficking. There will be no real deterrent effect without this, and they need to spend decades in jail for using a child as a pawn in their game of profit.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:45 PM
2

Did Facebook do anything with this post? Yet look at poor Milo who got banned off of Twitter. Point is, FB knew exactly what was going on and should have deleted the post and banned the user. The only thing they care about is stuffing ads down people's throats to make Zuckerpuke and his minions richer, and a man paid for it with his life and reputation.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 05:35 PM
6

Sadly, these days no man should ever allow themselves to be in a position of trust over children unless they can record their own conduct 24/7/365 to the point where anyone could view it and verify it. This is especially true if the man has any visible or known wealth or success. Not because men would do anything to harm children, but the hysteria hyped up by social/mass media is too much for one person to handle should a false accusation be made.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 05:32 PM
3

She would probably be involuntarily committed to a mental institution. Personally, IDGAF which one as long as she can't threaten the general public in that condition.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 05:22 PM
5

I don't give a fuck what recording laws are, I would record anyway. I'd rather have independently verifiable proof that I was in the right for an accusation of rape and assault and risk a conviction for recording without permission (which I would in any event have my lawyer challenge the law for being unduly restrictive precisely on the grounds of the circumstances involved in a case like this) than have my entire life ruined by some psychotic idiots accusing me of rape and who knows what other …
/r/MensRights05/09/16 05:19 PM
1

In a way, I wish I knew nothing about it. Failing that, it's important to disseminate the information so other people start understanding more about what goes on with abuse in general and abuse of men and boys in particular.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:39 PM
3

The unfortunate thing is that sometimes this is exactly what happens, and this cultural tendency to treat it like a positive thing can make it even harder for a boy/man to recover, when everyone's trying to convince him that he should feel happy about it and that only a fag/wuss would report the woman or "complain" about being manipulated Particularly when you combine that with this statement: "I lived with the constant fear of being discovered – she told me it had to be kept secret." It's not j…
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:46 PM
5

Pussy. Sadly, that will also allow her to get away with a suspended sentence I'm sure to be immortalized in the annals of /r/pussypass.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:36 PM
5

This is how political parties work, but particularly this one. They could care less about their own constituency, much less each other. Look what they did to Bernie, his supporters and his donors...all thrown under the bus.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:33 PM
5

Also the same one who defended her decision not to prosecute Philadelphia politicians being bribed despite having the audio of the bribery recorded, just because they are part of the same political party as she is.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:28 PM
2

I really don't mean to be pedantic about this, but you may want to correct the spelling of his name from "Jukes" to "Juckes" so that people looking for information on him look for the right person, and so that people don't criticize you needlessly to detract from your main point for what is obviously an honest error. Personally, I could care less what they call him, but he needs to be removed from the bench ASAP.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:20 PM
1

Parody you say? I would've jumped up out of my seat at the end and played the Soviet National Anthem. Hyper-statist bullshit indoctrination is the end goal of all of this. Go look at a description of a communist book store from the old Soviet Union and you'll see what I mean. More practically, I also would've filed complaints against the University for anti-male sexism. That really is the biggest problem from the MRM perspective: not using the system back against these feminist morons.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:28 PM
3

Wow Joe Satriani and Paul Gilbert in there for prostate cancer. Great cause, and glad to see more attention being brought to an unfortunately very common cancer.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:53 PM
8

Such is the hatred and selfishness of some women. They care about nothing except self-gratification at the expense of the safety and emotional health of their children. I wonder if these judges will have the guts to resign if something actually does happen to one of the girls.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:51 PM
2

Both cases are insane to not have had prison sentences, but I have to ask: what is the actual threshold for imprisonment if not this?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:42 PM
14

This HAS to be too lenient. Who fucking cares if they are deaf? What the fuck does that have to do with the sexual abuse of a six year old boy for fuck's sake? Can the prosecutor not appeal this sentence in the UK? Holy shit this is beyond infuriating, like /r/pussypass all-time Hall of Fame infuriating.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:39 PM
1

I think Stein's position is one of stated-forced equality in all branches of government, whereas Johnson's position is one of removing biases that negatively affect civil redress. Lawyers despise reform in family courts because it'll put them out of business. You know who they will support in this election.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:22 PM
1

Law, justice and ethics are all separate concepts that sometimes coincide with each other.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 01:03 PM
5

Amy is ingratiating herself with perpetrating anti-male false narratives by pandering to her female fans by condemning it FTFY
/r/MensRights18/08/16 12:49 PM
3

What about /r/pussypass?
/r/MensRights16/08/16 05:18 PM
2

Point taken
/r/MensRights08/08/16 12:35 PM
4

Someone in the comments said that the person quoted in the report couldn't define what the alleged offenses were.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 11:31 AM
5

“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who …
/r/MensRights08/08/16 11:29 AM
7

Attention all single guys: remember to look at what literature a girl reads, and dump her immediately if it includes Cosmo or any other anti-male nonsense that doesn't even deserve to be at the bottom of a bird cage.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 11:22 AM
3

creating a massive new base of low-skill, un-credentialed labor voters FTFY
/r/MensRights08/08/16 11:14 AM
5

It's becoming obvious that Australia is so virulently anti-male that the courts won't even inquire independently about the male parent's status in any way at any stage. I love the country and it's a great place to visit, but I sadly would never want to live there.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 05:06 PM
1

A site like COTWA or FIRE should have some of that, but the vast majority of civil cases end up settled before or during trial and the settlement sealed. That in and of itself is a problem because having a judgment stand acts as precedent for other cases, but the case needs to be iron-clad or it can backfire badly the other way.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 04:05 PM
9

Some countries are practically there already.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 07:48 PM
7

It's going to take some big payouts by universities before the insurance companies start demanding universities provide due process to accused students. As it stands, the university system is Kafkaesque and I would advise any male student to never be alone with a female student under any circumstances while they are a student, much less have physical contact with her.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 01:32 PM
1

I know...the guy is dirty fucking business. I guess my point is more about how tired I am of the media not paying attention to truly substantive issues in equal treatment, particularly the economy. But actual equality of opportunity and treatment for men and women? Nope...men are still disposable!
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:06 PM
1

Do you not understand this is all manufactured fervor by the MSM and social media to get attention? Khan and his deceased son are the props, and they drop Trump and Clinton and their minions and supporters into the media to see who will say the most ridiculous thing so that each side can frame and validate its position in their own minds based on reactions of others. Not giving a fuck about men is the tip of the iceberg here. We shouldn't even be talking about or know who this Khizr Khan charact…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:38 PM
1

I'd like to put them in hell in this life first, just to be sure.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:34 PM
7

I knew society considered men disposable, but I guess it really is heading towards farming them. Completely consistent with radfem bullshit, by the way.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:34 PM
3

Yet if a person lies to the police, they will be charged with obstruction of justice. More reason not to talk to the police without a competent attorney present.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 05:29 PM
2

This video, and an accompanying test, should be mandatory for completing fifth grade and its equivalent in every developed country in the world that has the equivalent of the fifth amendment.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 05:26 PM
2

Notice how the authorities shut up when the niqab goes on Hillary AND when Trump is naked. In the former case, it is out of fear both of being called out as hypocrites and for fear of offending radical islamists. In the latter case, it is clearly an anti-male bias and double standard being applied. I'd buy this artist a beer any day of the week.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 05:22 PM
8

Of all the negative aspects of this year's never-ending election hoopla, there are some positive aspects to it: We have learned that social media - especially Twitter and Facebook - are adept at shaping public opinions on virtually every aspect of life to their convenience. The short summary is: pro-Hillary, pro-feminism, pro-illegal-immigration; anti-men, anti-gun, anti-Trump, anti-third-party, anti-conservative. Any contrary information is purposely suppressed, ignored or redirected out of the…
/r/MensRights03/08/16 05:16 PM
2

If this man possessed marijuana, he should immediately submit a hair sample to an independent testing authority. Marijuana can last for months in the hair, and having such a sample can help exonerate him for this part of the case. I'm not sure what could have been done here, as the only defense to this is to become vigilantly paranoid when the slightest possessive behavior of the abusive spouse happens. It's difficult to defend yourself against someone you would otherwise trust. This whole situa…
/r/MensRights03/08/16 04:55 PM
12

There's no deterrent effect with sentences like this. These sentences hollow out the rule of law by effectively allowing such violence to take place against men and telling women they can get away with it. I'd bet the farm that a man would've received an actual jail sentence if he tore his spouse's vagina or nearly blinded her.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 04:43 PM
4

Just to be clear here, I'm generally not a fan of hate speech/hate crimes legislation because it inevitably results in the exclusion of certain groups in its enforcement in practice. I do, however, believe that statements such as "kill all men" that Clementine Ford has actually published on social media should be treated as the incitement of a criminal act, which is normally a crime in most countries. For now, it will be a useful exercise to use the existing system against itself and I agree tha…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 03:35 PM
3

It says she's supposedly on vacation coming back at some point. Unfortunately. What bothers me the most is how the media is completely ignoring her purposely inflammatory sexist social media posts targeted at men. If a man was "body shaming" a woman, the media would be all over it, but of course the MSM and social media are notorious for its double standard towards its non-favored groups. EDIT: Also technically inciting murder of men. Again, where the fuck s the reporting of this in the MSM?
/r/MensRights31/07/16 02:29 PM
16

I'd like to see a class-action lawsuit filed against the DNC for fraud by Bernie's donors. You can't represent one set of supposed rules and then stack the deck against the candidate for another. Of course both parties are a circus right now, but this coronation we are witnessing on the DNC side is beyond the pale.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 04:08 PM
1

If that school receives even a penny of federal funds or assistance, it is on the hook for Title IX. Being a public school, this should be a given, even if it's just for something like the lunch program.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 04:02 PM
1

Well good luck FWIW. I only suggested what I did because I see too many men just let the process of divorce go to their lawyers who refuse to fight for them and end up getting steamrolled by the other side's agenda. Glad to know you're already fighting it.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 11:23 PM
3

She's delusional and dangerous. Nobody should be falsely accused, but he was really smart to do this.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 07:37 PM
6

Your lawyer is a bit too passive on this IMO. He needs to turn this around on her to say that she is paranoid and delusional for mistaking an independent record of a conversation as being equivalent to (without any evidence whatsoever) someone following another person around in an unplanned and unwanted fashion. This, thereby, makes her judgment with regards to the children, any custody she may want over them, and skewing of facts regarding your marriage, fundamentally flawed. Get a notarized st…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 07:36 PM
16

File Title IX complaints. See what happens with these feminists when the shoe is on the other foot. It's a waste of taxpayer resources but it's one more step down the path of actual equal opportunity.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 07:02 PM
9

Degenerate fucks picking on a little boy so they can go out and enjoy themselves. Fucking low class trash that deserves hard time in prison.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 05:08 PM
1

This is the "Dear Colleague" letter that has destroyed countless lives of college-aged males in this country.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:18 PM
6

Absofuckinglutely correct - stay the fuck out of Canada
/r/MensRights19/07/16 09:38 PM
17

Out of control feminism and anti-male sentiment is a serious civil rights issue. It's mind boggling to think that someone who hasn't been convicted of a crime has had such sanctions imposed on him but it's exactly the same thought process as the Title IX "Dear Colleague" bullshit - if you can't get them with the judicial process, find some other way to negatively affect their lives because due process is an impediment to a radical agenda.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 09:35 PM
5

Yup 10/10 batshit crazy. Someone should have called the police on her for disturbing the peace.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 06:44 PM
2

You can bet your last dollar that a movie like that wouldn't appear on Disney. Nice to see that portrayal come out more.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:01 PM
13

It's too late - they're already there. Ever been to a school lately with all the feminist claptrap? You have anti-male gems like this openly sold by Scholastic and boys now falling behind in STEM and University enrollment overall. If the MRM would get its shit together and start promoting a policy of true equality, citingreal statistics on why men suffer more in society overall, and calling out the feminists, then this feminist bullshit might not spread.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:57 PM
21

I'd love to see how perceived income level with the exact same photos would change their view on this. You have to believe this survey would skew wildly. e.g. imagine the average dude with the glasses smiling standing next to a Porsche or Ferrari. Funny enough, how many men would find a woman attractive solely on looks and not on perceived income level?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:48 PM
37

You're assuming enough women will be charged with rape to make such a thing necessary.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:43 PM
1

You've got that right. There is so much internal inconsistency and hypocrisy in these organizations that only fanaticism can allow them to proliferate. Meanwhile, men and boys continue to suffer immeasurably as part of some twisted revenge catch-up ploy by women for all the time they feel they were oppressed.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:41 PM
1

This guy wasn't kidding ...
/r/MensRights22/06/16 11:58 AM
3

Well the ACLU should in theory help them out because it's a first amendment issue and Milo being gay, but won't because of its political leanings against conservatives. Funny how it takes a libertarian leaning organization has to be the one to defend free speech, and how left-leaning institutions like universities now throw gays under the bus when they otherwise would staunchly defend them.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 11:38 AM
4

"You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how."
/r/MensRights21/06/16 05:41 PM
2

The basic rule for every man due to the fear-mongering media and third wave feminism is to avoid any position of trust over children where there are not 100% reliable witnesses (really, some kind of continuous recording) throughout the entire interaction. This is especially true if the male has any type of wealth known to the children or their parents. It's outrageous. It's ridiculous. And it's the only way to deal with this effectively.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 10:11 PM
2

That's the horrifying thing...people are actually buying this. It's to be expected when rule of law is replaced with political correctness, an education focused on basics is corrupted with a statist view that abhors critical thinking, and a media that is highly corrupt and has no modicum of independent criticism of the real situation in politics and government. Mark my words when I say this country is finished if that hypocritical traitorous vermin of a presidential candidate wins in November.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 06:33 PM
1

I admire your idealism and it would've been nice to get recordings and an ass-kicking for them, and it is so hilarious to watch the feminists defend their spouse-abusing hero, but bear in mind: This happened two decades ago where you had an hour of recording capability in a device about the size of a small box of tissues Those agents is there for serious threats to life, and the old double standard of "I'm a woman hitting a man so it's ok" is evident especially in that era If you do any reading …
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:51 PM
9

Amber, this one's for you...
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:35 PM
10

"We apologize for our actions and would never condone violence against women." Will you speak out against violence for men then, Fox? What a fucking double standard. Such a pile of shit.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 09:45 PM
6

Until punitive damages start affecting the finances of these institutions to the point of deterrence, they will not change.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 03:43 PM
3

You were expecting logical consistency? I'd rather laugh at her than get pissed off as it's better for my health, but she is so ridiculous it's laughable.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 08:45 PM
19

That's why this quote grated me pretty hard: That’s right — I’m a feminist, I am a mother of two girls, and I am saying that men and women are not equal. If the article's writer truly claims men and women are unequal, then she should stop complaining and summoning the SJWs every time she and others like her perceive a slight against women. You can't have it both ways. I'm all for equal opportunity. Besides, even if women aren't sent into combat, there are lots of other roles that they can do. Bu…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 08:12 PM
4

Funny how there's no mention or complaint about the heavily female-dominated nursing profession. Really, how many times do we have to say equal opportunity does not mean equal outcome? Who the hell is standing in the way of any "identifiable group" to prevent them from making these piles of money? This article is more manufactured bullshit by the mainstream media for idiots who can't think for themselves in their own echo chamber.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:31 PM
24

But she totally felt assaulted. That should mean something. It means she's a very shitty and unethical actress.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 05:23 PM
3

And incur the SJW's wrath? I think not! (and now I'm sad...)
/r/MensRights08/02/16 05:23 PM
5

Ex post facto regret of a sex act is IMO the largest root of the problem in Title IX cases in US colleges, and I suspect in other parts of the world as well. I think it's mainly used as an accuser's tool for revenge for not getting their way, or to cover up infidelity or poor reputation.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 06:58 PM
26

Relatives of the five teenage suspects said the video shows the 18-year-old woman with her pants down as her father stands nearby. In a short clip viewed by The Post, a young woman sits on the ground grinning, while young men laugh in the background. At one point, a teen asks an older man, “Can we have some of that?,” law enforcement sources said. A young man then tells the girl, “You said, ‘Yeah.’ That’s what I’m saying, it’s lit [OK], like you know what I mean? I could tell you a freak,” accor…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 06:55 PM
1

Besides the obvious bias against men in the courts, most attorneys would not want to stop the gravy train. Divorce is an industry predicated on attorneys asking you "fight and make my kids rich, or settle and make your own kids rich" almost every time. Fighting for "principle" rather than minimizing your losses is what most of the attorneys count on, and why they don't want alimony reform: it will greatly dry up their supply of gravy.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 06:50 PM
21

Lesson #2: All employers would rather risk a wrongful dismissal suit than a sexual harassment suit. It's always cheaper and easier to defend, and much less negative PR. In fact, a record of a lawsuit on an employer on Lexis or Westlaw with your name attached as a plaintiff could mean one becomes effectively unemployable in any organization that background checks prospective hires. In addition, at 20 years old you likely don't have proven earning potential muted by such a termination that an expe…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 06:45 PM
3

Hopefully he'll at least be sued into the ground, although it's not really a substitute for imprisonment. Looking at him and his swagger and attitude in the pictures, I would not be surprised if there wasn't some vigilante justice in store for him at some point even though that is definitely not a solution either. One can only hope the prosecutors will appeal the verdict.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 03:27 PM
2

Oh, the sweet irony! The same blind "progressive" idiots who fight so hard for women are throwing minorities under the bus. What's next? #notallfeminists? The cherry on top from the article: Suk, writing for the New Yorker, outlined the past "historical bias against victims," who were not believed, but suggested that bias not be replaced "with the tenet that an accuser must always and unthinkingly be fully believed." Alright Jeannie Suk, what are you going to do when someone accuses you of rape?…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:31 PM
3

Senator Gillibrand is the drag on the economy. The only thing more outrageous than her is her idiot constituents that keep voting her in.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:57 PM
7

His Nobel prize should be revoked. Not only had he accomplished absolutely nothing when they gave him the prize, his administration's policies have created ISIS in their interference with foreign governments and arming "rebels" to fight them. Same cycle of crap since the Dulles brothers.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:40 PM
30

It's this ridiculous guilt about our historical aspects of our culture when virtually none of us have participated in nor think like anything we're accused of.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:36 PM
2

Not sure if judges are elected in your state, but if they are can your brother not hand their political opponents the proverbial nuke to say that the judge and the government lawyer conspired to continue allowing custody of a child to a rapist? There is no jurisdiction in the US that would allow such a gap in ages for sex. Sorry to hear that he's going through so much crap too.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:32 PM
3

Why can't this so-called journalist (and his editor) lose his job? Where is the outrage for defending a rapist in an article? Oh that's right! That would go against the narrative of men always being the aggressors.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:28 PM
1

So much this. We can't legislate cultural change, and culture is ultimately the source of the majority of our problems in this country. Amazon should very much be commended and only provides additional examples for people and corporations to hopefully follow.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:16 PM
1

It's sad that Australia keeps coming up in this subreddit due to the treatment of females there with "kid gloves" so to speak. Can you elaborate on what is going on?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:40 PM
1

This is the ultimate destiny of all the ultra feminist idiots until society normalizes to equal treatment in practice. They will always find radical niches to ply their insanity on others and be shielded from perfectly valid criticism of how wrong and hypocritical they are. I've long predicted this for Emma Sulcowicz, the Columbia mattress idiot. No legitimate corporation would hire her for the controversy that surrounds her, but some non-profit feminazi organization will assuredly pick her up a…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:35 PM
7

That this is STATE SANCTIONED SEXISM is insane. From the article: "Revenue Canada declined to be interviewed. However, it did say that this gender rule has gone before the courts and the Canadian Human Rights Commission in the past, and the policy upheld."
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:49 PM
2

Wow, even more articles about Australia and this double standard they have with men vs. women. Probably the fourth or fifth in a couple of weeks. I love visiting, I love my friends there, and I would so love to live there, but this feminist statist undercurrent just ruins it for me.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:43 AM
2

You know, I don't care whether they have poor reasoning or not. If they do, stick them in prison. If not, stick them in a psychiatric hospital under guard. Either way, keep them away from the kids. FFS.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:40 AM
4

the British justice system the justice system the legal system FTFY. Justice in these biased cases comes rarely if ever, particular in a country as soft on crime and hard on self-defense as the UK. Only the tyranny of government allows its whim to stand on decisions like this and why we call it a legal system. Calling the legal system a justice system would only be right if justice was meted out consistently and regularly. This case and others show that it's not.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:36 AM
2

According to the link I gave, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New Hampshire require all parties to consent prior to recording, whereas Rhode Island, Vermont and Maine do not require all parties to consent. Consult an attorney ASAP before proceeding no matter what.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 04:23 AM
2

Sorry, I'm not following you here. Are you saying there is precedent in case law to award damages solely for recording someone in an academic setting simply to establish the infringement of their rights under federal or state law? If so, can you cite such cases?
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:11 PM
1

Correct. Unless that student has some prominent public image that allows them to accumulate wealth (e.g. child star), or the allegations materially prevent the student from engaging in activities that would lead to the accumulation of wealth (e.g. a record preventing entry into a college), there would be no cause of action for slander. Such statements, however, are likely a violation of the professional guidelines that the organization for accreditation of teachers in OP's state and, depending o…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:24 PM
2

Correct. OP should consult a qualified attorney ASAP.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:20 PM
2

This site provides the requirements for recording conversations state-by-state, although OP should consult an attorney ASAP to initiate action for what looks to be a Title IX violation.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:17 PM
2

You need to understand a few things here: Whether or not the school claims to allow it by agreement, recording of a conversation is legally permitted under criminal law as long as the parties to that conversation in the recording are informed per state law when required. A list of states and their recording laws can be found here. A counterclaim in civil court requires that actual damages be demonstrated in some way due to a violation of an agreement. For example, a student recording lectures an…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:14 PM
15

Put another way, failure to report these crimes puts other people at risk and is completely irresponsible even if it is their right to do so. As usual, Senators Gillibrand (NY) and McCaskill (MO) are against reporting crimes and somehow get away with this with the idiots that voted them in! If there was ever a negative political ad for one of their opponents to jump all over them with, this would be the issue to make that happen. The real story is actually that they advocate more state control b…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:56 PM
1

Except that it is their duty to uphold the law and the constitution to treat everyone equally, rather than their opinion or that of someone else. And yes, it's not that simple, but that's where it should start and end. Maybe a few costly judgments and some public ridicule will get these idiots to comply with the law.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 05:38 PM
2

One can only hope you're right...
/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:46 PM
3

She won't need to. The ultra feminist organizations supported by their slack-jawed syncophants will hire women like this almost assuredly.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:22 PM
2

I've said it many times that this is where extremist feminists end up and why their antics will be tolerated. Emma Sulkowicz is another example of this phenomenon: utterly reprehensible misandry and behavior that will lead her to work for an ultra feminist organization. Now, if we MRM advocates were more organized and could start some media events, and the media would actually pick up this narrative about Clementine Ford and her employer, then maybe we would start getting somewhere. I don't see …
/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:21 PM
1

Only way to describe this is a cult of personality. No more political dynasties. We need to teach people to idolize principle more than people.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 03:53 PM
1

The system has fucked this guy sideways, and his stories bring about both anger and sorrow for me. He isn't the only one, unfortunately. I'm sure the situation will only be made worse by the self-declared feminist prime minister in Canada appoints even more idiots in positions of power to counteract all the supposed white male oppression in Canada.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:27 PM
4

The right response would have been for the university to fire her for threatening violence. My guess is that they didn't want to raise the ire of the rest of the knuckledragging protesters.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:23 PM
5

It also goes back to what degree each side conflates equal opportunity with equal outcome. I certainly don't think that one implies the other in any way, but the feminist radicals will use this discrepancy and the lack of critical thinking skills instilled in the public to modify their view. This despite the fact that even affirmative action programs have failed and will continue to fail in creating equality in numbers but succeed in creating tyranny against the group that's dominant in numbers.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:31 PM
2

Well we wouldn't want the media to weave a narrative that actually exposed these kinds of details and showed how insane the perpetrators are, would we? /s
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:23 PM
3

It'll take the skull of someone he knows or loves being smashed in to change the judge's mind. Imagine if someone had been hit by a drunk driver in the face with the mirror as they walked down a street without a sidewalk. Nobody would dare make a distinction. You are right on the money when you say men are basically targets under Australian law. The worst part is that one punch can kill someone, either through being hit in the wrong place or from the ensuing fall. Doesn't happen often as the maj…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 10:28 PM
2

Can't these "banned" groups complain to that human rights commission up there like a Title IX complaint here?
/r/MensRights06/11/15 01:32 PM
5

This "post-sex regret means rape" mentality is dangerous and an abrogation of personal responsibility that's so common today.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:40 PM
3

Indeed! Disregard of the law is the beginning of tyranny. And thank you for the cake day wishes!
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:38 PM
17

McCaskill said while it’s important for colleges to honor the due process rights of accused students, treating both the accuser and the accused fairly can be accomplished without turning campus hearings into courtrooms. The legal system is about is "about depriving someone of their liberty, putting them in prison, labeling them a sex offender for the rest of their life,” she said, while the Title IX process is focused on campus safety. If this idiotic line of thinking doesn't immediately disqual…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:36 PM
1

100% correct. As the old saying goes, when seconds count the police are only minutes away. That rang true for someone I know who got murdered by an abusive ex, as they had no gun nor could they carry one legally according to the whim of the county sheriff. The real cause of male-on-male violence is cultural in nature; namely, drug and gang culture, fatherless families and the hypocritical media glamorization of violence. Start addressing these issues and these stats will skew much less. Let's no…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 01:28 PM
2

Everyone who receives such a notice needs to write a letter to the university administration asking if there is training for females being offered in the same way as for males. If not, then the same letter also informs the university administration that a Title IX complaint is being made and should be investigated accordingly, and the letter copied to the Department of Education.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 05:28 PM
2

Every male student on a campus who sees training directed at males should send a certified letter to the administration of the university asking whether or not the same consent training is offered to women, and if not that the letter then constitutes an immediate complaint for Title IX gender discrimination for singling out males.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 05:18 PM
1

Did she bring this up in court or not? If not, then I can't see how what I suggested could alienate your ex. This is about two people - you and your daughter. If you don't take charge of this situation, I'm worried that your ex will, at your expense.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 05:38 PM
1

Any content that you generate has nothing to do with your ex. This is only about your feelings towards your daughter. What did she specifically accuse you of? Also, how is or could this possibly be used against you? Your ex saying that you're alienating her from her daughter in court requires actual proof. Privately, it makes no difference. If you mention nothing in your content about your ex and make it only about your daughter and you, there is nothing actionable by your ex.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:16 PM
1

I mentioned this previously but an inexpensive way to counter the alienation of your child's affection is to blog every day, with photographs and videos with the daily newspaper visible outside to verify date, about where you would be and what you would do with your child. Buy toys, go to the park, walk in the woods, whatever. Just do a different thing every day and record your thoughts and how much you love her. This will do two things. First, it can be used in your favor to prove your commitme…
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:53 PM
2

Yes sir...
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:19 PM
7

How about teaching people that regret after consent, particularly due to peer shame, is their responsibility and not that of the other party involved in the sex act?
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:11 PM
6

"blurred lines" Henceforth, possession or consumption of any music by Robin Thicke is an offence punishable by immediate expulsion.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:08 PM
3

Neither should regret after the fact change a consensual sex act into a crime.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 11:49 AM
3

The difference between Jessica Jin and I is that Jessica needs to openly wield her "weapon" to make her point, whereas I will purposely hide my weapon while carrying to make mine such that it creates enough doubt for those who might attack anyone including me to think twice about doing so. P.S. Jessica, your open radicalism will now exclude you from anything but self-employment, crime and radical feminist organizations employing you.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:50 PM
21

“The price they pay is a very heavy one. The emotional strain of it is huge on everyone, the drain in financial resources is enormous and none of it serves the family,” she said. Sharland, from Wilmslow, Cheshire, had accepted £10.35m in cash and properties from her ex-husband Get over yourself. If you think it's such an emotional strain because you received >GBP10M, the main problem is you and not what your ex-husband may or may not have withheld. More reason why maintaining a previous standard…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:29 PM
3

...and be the example of what happens when you have sex with people who you have entrusted to your care and harm multiple families including your own so that other people are deterred from such actions in the future.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 11:25 AM
14

People love watching Tony Stark's arrogant swagger and smart-ass comments while he ultimately does the right thing. Pepper Potts is cute but doesn't have anywhere near the personality that Tony Stark does in these Marvel movies. I think this is more attention-seeking behavior by this actress and the media, similar to the female UFC fighter story.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 11:19 AM
2

The more attention you bring to yourself, the more you open yourself up to criticism, as Adria Richards learned the hard way. Bet she wishes she had just sent the guy a private message instead.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 03:17 PM
2

"Well if I were a man, I wouldn't have been considered a bitch." Paging Jesse Pinkman. Jesse Pinkman, please pick up the white courtesy phone.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 03:10 PM
27

Relevant quotes: "Because there isn't as many female fighters as there are male fighters." ... "Women do a better job." Obviously they aren't doing a better job when it comes to grammar, as her diatribe shows. Also, obvious clickbait article is obvious.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 03:05 PM
6

If this "private" institution received even a dollar of federal funding, this is a Title XI complaint because the girl wan't punished as a willing co-participant. And why the fuck are permanent school records treated like criminal records but for kids? The only negative thing on such records ought to be blatantly serious criminal activity and documented repeated serious disruptions. I don't blame the mom for this.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 02:59 PM
1

Is it immature to say that his name sounds a bit like "fucker" in French, or is that just the stars aligning to tell us the truth about Mr. White Knight?
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:32 PM
1

And yet, where is his support of gender equality when it comes to requiring women to register for selective service? More hypocritical window dressing for the loons who vote on issues the media panders to while ignoring real economic issues.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 01:04 PM
2

Do you have an independent citation for this claim? This post seems to indicate things are changing.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:44 PM
1

Yeah I know...it's just that some people get prickly on reddit when her name is invoked and I just don't need the downvotes. As a friend of mine once said, "if we both agree on everything, one of us is redundant."
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:31 PM
15

The word you're looking for is statism. This is also what I think when I hear the terms "Republicrat" or similar. I am not a "Randroid", but this quote from Ayn Rand's work still rings true: "Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to cra…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:15 PM
92

What a piece of steaming dogshit Mary Koss is.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 06:33 PM
61

Really sorry to hear that you didn't get the justice you sought and that your children needed. I would seriously start a blog to address your children every day, individually, as a diary of how much you miss them and what you wish you could do with them if they were there. Take pictures of the text of your posts next to newspapers with the date visible and post those. Post every day until they turn 18. It's a record of your unconditional love that nobody can suppress. Make sure they know about i…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 09:17 PM
3

Her statement is a red herring and a non-sequitur. The point here is that both parties ought to be required to mitigate their damages, and agreements like lifetime alimony are inherently unconscionable by this standard alone. The most ironic thing about the opposition by NOW, besides bringing a child with no understanding of the issues as a pawn into this debate, is that lifetime alimony implies that women should not be inherently equal to men.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 07:29 PM
3

There's nothing you can do for the feminazi SJWs who complain about this shit. Men lose either way because, according to the idiots' logic: If the minions were all male, they accuse the creator of being sexist because there are no females. If the minions were all female, they accuse the creator of being sexist because it advocates for subjugation of females as 'minions' or slaves.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 07:10 PM
8

Appeal the decision internally. Heck, file a Title IX complaint while you're at it if you can give a description of the girl, citing unequal treatment. Turn the tables on these fuckers for once.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:15 PM
1

You are correct, sir! A huge problem with third-wave feminism is that it's schizophrenic when it regards the power of a woman. Should a woman be extended extra rights over men, or should she be considered equal? It's all agenda-driven, designed to destroy traditional notions of family and human interaction and embed the state where it has no business being. Other than to advocate for true equality (which would really make you and I ERAs, or equal-rights advocates), we need to stand up against th…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:20 PM
1

Very very sadly, I think you're right about the repercussions in the UK. The culture there is astonishingly progressive to the point of destroying nearly every vestige of traditional culture within the UK for a twisted self-loathing view of that which was formerly there. Feminism is merely one of many manifestations of that, much like capitulation to sharia law is for certain religious groups in the UK. Here in the US, Thomas Jefferson once said "The tree of liberty must be refreshed periodicall…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 01:10 PM
2

Good luck with this. You should fight this as much as possible. The UK has a horrendous double standard when it comes to men's rights vs. women's rights, and it's completely unacceptable. If you can coordinate an ECHR complaint, that would be good as well. Hit them hard and fast, and draw attention to their hypocrisy. On a side note, this whole "lad culture" that the article brings up should be counterbalanced with a "lass culture". Women rape men too, and if they're making you take those classe…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 01:03 PM
11

This is why everyone falsely accused has to fight back in civil court for something that should never even be adjudicated outside of a real criminal court. Unfortunately, not everyone has the money to fight, and this is how they win. If you can't fight the charges and you were expelled despite no criminal conviction, the system must be filling a gap by kicking these people out of school anyway. Right? Also, fuck Mae Flexer for failing civics.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:57 PM
16

You can't consent if you're certifiably 100% insane like Sulkowicz is. She's gone off the deep end.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:55 PM
2

Let's try some word substitution, shall we: Writer says that some who believe college MURDER cases should be handled by the criminal justice system are practicing 'a subtle misanthropy' Writer says that some who believe college ROBBERY cases should be handled by the criminal justice system are practicing 'a subtle misanthropy' Ridiculous, isn't it? Colleges are not extraterritorial fiefdoms, especially when the participants are there both voluntarily and are of the age of majority. There should …
/r/MensRights19/05/15 08:18 PM
2

She's a fucking criminal for inciting violence. I don't agree with the whole concept of hate crimes as it's completely politicized, but I do agree with criminal charges against people like her for attempting to incite violence against one or more people of any stripe. Calling out men would simply indicate premeditated intent. Put this piece of trash in prison ASAP.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 08:06 PM
36

In the real world, that's just about all she would be qualified to do besides cleaning toilets. She ought to be ashamed of what she's done, especially given the text messages she sent to him for some time after the alleged incident. In the pretend world of teh feelz (in other words, this world), she will take a prominent place at some radical feminist organization spewing her hate against men and due process. No worry about staining the reputation of the organization when the organization itself…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 08:03 PM
5

I'm certain a lawyer hired on contingency would be more than happy to extract a nice sum of money out of her without ever filing court papers. Most cases never make it to court anyway, and of those only about 2-3% ever get ruled on. I personally think he should litigate this. People need to be taught a lesson that libel is a potentially irreversibly life-altering event for the victim.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:03 PM
5

Yeah this is definitely very informative not just for DV but for nearly any police interaction. Every male who reaches 18 years of age should be given a copy of this to read and warned to heed it at all costs.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 12:51 PM
4

These people are insane. No use in trying to make sense out of their idiotic comments.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:28 PM
9

Amazingly enough, the court not only reversed paternity for the ex-husband but also made her pay 54000 pounds back to him. I guess outright fraud does sometimes play a role in these cases, though nowhere near enough for any semblance of fairness.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 07:54 PM
3

Using her ridiculously low threshold of 'feelz' she would be guilty of child molestation merely by accusation. There's a reason that there is due process in a criminal court of law and that's the ultimate irony of her argument. Devolving justice to her standard will make the world descend into chaos.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 01:01 PM
28

Yeah and that's why in some places you're married if you shack up for a period of time even if you never had a legal document or ceremony for it. All because some gender wants revenge equality by playing the weaker gender and claw back that money they think they're owed. Always check the laws in your state if you intend to cohabitate with someone.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 01:33 PM
4

This fucking story is so beyond outrageous that I hope these NGO assholes spend the rest of their miserable child abusing lives in a Kenyan prison. We also need to find out which NGO this was. But none of this will matter since the media doesn't support equality.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 04:04 AM
4

I am no randroid (and check my comment history if you doubt me because I've said this previously) but the point about making rules to institute power is still valid. They've already made so many rules that it's essentially almost illegal to be male in an educational institution.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:30 PM
11

"Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who …
/r/MensRights20/04/15 04:54 PM
2

Also consider providing QR codes for poster-size applications. Anyone wanting to do a quick check would be much more inclined to use a QR code rather than type a long URL in. EDIT: thanks for the poster!
/r/MensRights20/04/15 04:50 PM
9

It's OKCupid. What did you expect? The comments in that subreddit prove decisively why logical thinking can't apply to any criticism of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 04:18 PM
4

Well they ought to proofreading it if nothing else. I feel that the feminazis will disregard the facts and engage in ad hominem attacks when they see the "homocide" instead of "homicide". Otherwise a very blunt and frank set of facts that are hard to refute, and a very welcome effort. This should be posted everywhere feminist propaganda is posted.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 04:00 PM
4

I think it will take people being personally liable for not having due process, as well as protecting an accused person's identity until all possible court proceedings are finished, to prevent such occurrences in the future. Making the taxpayers liable is effectively a tragedy of the commons and will destroy far too much wealth before anything meaningful is done to prevent recurring false allegations from destroying lives.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:50 PM
1

/r/punchablefaces
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:52 PM
2

Dependence on the state, rather than non-state actors (i.e. family, friends) is the ultimate goal. Displacing people leaves them with nowhere to go but to the state for assistance such as welfare and child support, and retribution against the primary breadwinners for daring to be married. Don't forget that federal money comes in to state child support agencies and private money to lawyers the more split the family becomes, so they practically encourage what happens.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:31 AM
2

The main reason to attack marriage is to attack the cohesiveness that prevents dependence on government and to aggregate power based on individuals not having the type of support that they would otherwise have. This is also why the feminists/statists have effectively won in the Nordic countries and effective tax rates are above 50% of earned income. Personally, I much prefer less government intrusion. Divorce rates wouldn't be so high and marriage so unpalatable if divorce wasn't so retributive …
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:27 AM
3

How could a man possibly court a woman when the entire system is rigged against them if they make a mistake and the culture and system begs people to be so fickle and utilize institutions as a retributive mechanism? I've long contended that destroying traditional institutions destroys the cohesiveness that prevents government intrusion. That's why everyone from the Bolsheviks to the feminists demand the destruction of traditional family and institutions. Doing this creates greater dependence on …
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:20 AM
3

Perpetual poverty so that the paying parent (i.e. sucker) is viewed as a deadbeat.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:10 AM
3

That and the 10% interest on back support. What the actual fuck? Please tell me where I can take my money and earn 10% guaranteed interest on it in 2015.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:08 AM
1

She freely admits to a sexist stereotype that suggest that men negotiate harder than women if you advocate true equality. Where's my #notallsumpinsumpin tag again? So are men and women equal or are they not? Characters like this have no internal consistency. That's why there's no point debating with them and especially why they have no business at the C-level of any company.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:03 AM
5

I think the child support order should be contingent on both parties materially fulfilling their obligations - alimony and visitation alike. If the custodial parent moves out of state and that changes either their own income due to a better job or costs due to much lower cost housing, then that may be a mitigating factor. To do it simply to skirt their obligations should be prevented at all costs and should be viewed as contempt of court and a violation of the child's best interests, assuming th…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 02:02 PM
2

That defense lawyer is a fucking victim-blaming asshole.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:53 PM
1

Just make sure she doesn't know where you're going. If that means deleting friends on your social networking or your account and not telling anyone that might leak that information to her, then do that. Good luck.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:49 PM
4

It doesn't matter if she speaks to you or not. You can't interfere with someone's life in this way. If nothing else, I'd have a lawyer send her a cease and desist letter for defamation. Otherwise, I see you have two options: Move somewhere else. Accept this for the foreseeable future. Good luck with whatever you do, because this situation is some serious bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:33 PM
2

Me too...
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:30 PM
2

The fact she won't even give the guy a handy seems unbelievably selfish even if she's technically free to do what she wants, and the fact that she chose to reveal that part of her life opens her up to that type of criticism. My problem is that using the bully pulpit to push this type of agenda is not good for men, even though I agree fully with you that she's ultimately free to say what she wants. Imagine the outrage if it was a male writer who only got blowjobs and sent the woman on her way. Ev…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:30 PM
12

It's sad to be this cynical when a man who's a victim of domestic violence fears his own arrest if he calls the police.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:35 PM
6

You need a restraining order against your ex and anyone who participates in her actions against you, assuming you've cut off all contact with her. It's unacceptable to interfere with a person's life in this way and there are legal means to prevent that type of interference.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:34 PM
1

Whatever it is, OP can usually get an initial consultation with a lawyer for a nominal fee through a lawyer referral service. This is not something OP or us should be guessing at because of the variations in laws across states/provinces/cantons/prefectures/countries/whatever.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:33 PM
0

What do you expect from a government-run media organization? If you deviate from the party line, you are gone. Too bad most of the idiot sheep that listen to this crap eat it up without questioning it.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:23 PM
6

While that drug addict needs to be doing life imprisonment for manslaughter for the suicide of this falsely accused guy's mother, the real question is why is this prosecutor not behind bars? The answer is that Kamala Harris is allowing prosecutorial misconduct over and over again. That is one piece of shit of an AG that is fucking up California even harder than it already is, and she needs to be behind bars forever too.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:20 PM
23

The social media comments also constitute libel and tortious interference with OP's business for which the restaurant and any participating employees may be jointly and severally liable. OP needs to consult an attorney ASAP.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:54 PM
5

I'm going to come out and say this again: all of us MRAs need to pull together to shame SJWs in direct proportion to their intended harm of the targeted individual until it becomes too costly for them or the social media companies to continue allowing this nonsense.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:55 PM
10

Even the interviewer was shocked at her response though. I think this whole SJW thing has gotten out of hand now. Their biggest problem is that they go out of their way to attempt to destroy someone's life merely because they didn't like what they had to say, and not realizing the implications of attempting to destroy someone's life or their own in the process. Did Adria Richards not care about this man's life for one stupid comment? As the quote shows, she obviously doesn't and it backfired in …
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:52 PM
2

Yeah we'll see if he keeps saying "not that there's anything wrong with that" if he gets divorced.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:03 PM
6

It is primitive thinking, and more importantly utterly selfish thinking because of how it could negatively affect children. Says more about society than anything else.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:48 PM
53

Then imagine a swarm of worthless SJWs tweeting that fact for the feelz
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:02 PM
2

Well you tell him this point blank then: every dollar that he spends on a child that isn't his is a dollar that comes out of his own children's pockets and into the pockets of her and her lawyers. Drill that into his head every chance you get. If that isn't enough incentive, then nobody can say any more. I'm just really sorry that you're going through this and understand the level of frustration. It's not only hard to watch, but propagates the ex-wife's type of bad behavior not only against men …
/r/MensRights03/03/15 04:46 PM
1

The question is going to come down to whether or not your brother signed the birth certificate. If he did, he's right fucked and has a very long battle with a very low chance of winning. If he didn't, then that is definitely fraudulent and can be fought in court but will still take a lot of money and time. You can also bet diamonds to dollars that his ex-wife's lawyer will pull every delay tactic and bullshit filing out of their collective asses to break your brother, but he has a much better ch…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:07 PM
2

Can't say I feel sorry for them no matter what the reason. What else would you expect from an inherently unethical organization?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:59 PM
59

Unless medically necessary, no child should be subject to this. The decision should be made by him when he turns 18. End of story. This is government-sanctioned mutilation of a little boy.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:29 PM
23

And then people wonder why government is bloated, inefficient and costly? What has to happen is that everyone should mark they are some special ethnicity or some other specially-promoted group, just like you did. Then it will devolve back to its normal, just like Syndrome's quote from The Incredibles: "When I'm old and I've had my fun, I'll sell my inventions so everyone can have powers! Everyone can be super! And when everyone's super, no one will be."
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:26 PM
1

A teacher that works with my mom said that she hears her kindergarteners using all sorts of foul language in class with and at each other and her administrator says there's nothing she or they can do about it. Compassion, humanity and balanced critical thinking is being purposely bred out of society and being let through the system. You're only watching this on the other end now, and it's definitely not getting any better.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:19 PM
2

It actually comes down to dependence on government funding at the federal level to the coercion due to administration policy under the guise of Title IX. That's why all this went nuts back in 2011. Remember that the drinking age is 21 because federal transportation dollars would be pulled if it wasn't raised, even though Canada has a drinking age of 19 and even though a man can be forced to go to war at 18 here.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:05 PM
13

The police are half the problem here. It's amazing how lazy they've become in investigating even the most basic pieces of evidence. The guy in the story here was only exonerated after the CCTV evidence cleared him, but why the fuck didn't the cops attempt to obtain it before charging him? Between shit like this, the attention-whoring media, and naming the accused before conviction as opposed to initials like it's done in some other countries, no wonder we have the situation that exists today.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:50 PM
2

THIS right here. That maid that started the whole mess of accusations against him was a little too conveniently placed. The guy's Blackberry was deactivated a half hour after he left the hotel in NYC and there were calls to the hotel's HQ in Paris. This whole thing stinks.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 08:08 PM
3

The statists will also be up in arms over this (and are often the same crowd). DNA testing threatens the infrastructure that allows non-biological men to become responsible for the children of others and all of the associated courts, lawyers, child case workers, enforcement, advocacy groups and other related jobs.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:58 PM
1

I second this. OP should fight because this woman's credibility is completely shot and there are more holes in her story than a ton of Swiss cheese. That and her brand of crazy on the witness stand will come through. Please fight this OP whatever you do and make sure you have a lawyer in your corner to do so.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:30 PM
3

It's bad enough that she's a royal cunt to her ex-husband, but I worry most for those kids whose view of the world will be twisted to be anti-male and will abuse others, just like other victims of abuse.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:50 PM
2

This right fucking here. Wish more people knew this. The whole system is rigged from the start to fuck men over and destroy family wealth so they can keep sucking off the government teat.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:49 PM
1

I'm sure a civil rights lawyer somewhere will take them on in federal court if they refuse to investigate it. The institution's lawyers, if they're worth anything at all, will settle this long before the filing.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:45 PM
1

The information was in this article which was very subtly linked from the article OP posted. That was the real top to bottom of the story and you ought to read it although it is enraging to some extent. That the radical feminist psychos started bleating again was to be practically expected, though even their comments pages were quite unkind to them.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:22 PM
6

Once you understand that Cenk was effectively fired (by demotion) from fucking MSNBC, the lowest of the lowlife assholes posing as journalists, you'll understand everything about him.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:08 PM
5

Divorce reduces wealth more than any event except for medical bills for an underinsured or uninsured individual. The system is geared to make parents as combative as possible with the only true winners as lawyers and the only true losers as the kids. It's all a part of a greater plan for the state to take a greater role in influencing and controlling people's lives. I wish you luck FWIW.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:03 PM
58

It's not just Emma Sulkowicz who falsely accused him but the two others as well, as encouraged by the Alpha Delta Phi co-ed fraternity's officer! Then Senator Kirsten Gillibrand decides that she will come to her rescue without all of the facts in order to pander to her constituency rather than uphold the truth. The same insane group mentality that hit the Salem witch hunts is what's happening again here. The only bright spot in this situation for now is that no respectable company will ever hire…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:25 PM
1

That's the most ironic part. If you read the actual history of Mother Jones, you'll know that she was blatantly against many of the positions now espoused by the eponymous magazine.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:43 PM
1

Because /r/pussypass needs material too, at our expense :(
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:15 AM
2

It sure will
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:48 PM
6

I thought it was some exercise in an advanced college psychology class on what is wrong with this person's state and how would they propose treatment for a sociopathic narcissist. Either that or clickbait and fodder for /r/thathappened. Then my cynical side realized there really are women this fucking crazy and I wept for humanity a little more.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 03:48 PM
44

It is if you're an idiot feminist or white knight. The article says that the complainant was retaliated against for filing a complaint against the Argonauts which is even worse than the original complaint. If you don't agree with us, we punish you and get away with it? Fuck that.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 03:26 PM
1

Doubleplusungood EDIT: This is the type of doubletalk found in the book 1984, for those who it didn't devolve upon. I'm trying to make the point that only totalitarians like the uber-feminists and their idiot white knights would speak like this. Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:58 PM
19

That's exactly what I was thinking! Those silly pictures of pets who pee on the carpet or eat the Thanksgiving turkey off the counter or something. That stupid look on his face too. Does he even have testicles?
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:54 PM
2

Communism is the system which must inherently fail because it doesn't recognize that people are individuals and not everyone wants to be equal.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 09:27 PM
0

The key part of my statement was that a sexual act was perpetrated by a person in a position of power over that individual. Particularly when that individual - a student, in this case - is not legally an adult, it is an extremely precarious position to be in. This is the difference between homosexuality and underage teacher-student sex. Most people don't give a shit what people do behind closed doors unless it's a minor in a situation that could become coercive, even if it "isn't" coercive.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 09:15 PM
26

Equal opportunity does not mean equal outcome. Forcing equal outcome introduces negative economic and social distortions.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:56 PM
2

Every time I see Wikipedia asking for donations I think of sending them some mushrooms because of all the shit in their organization.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:37 PM
1

Too bad that secret means avoiding mutual pleasure, and I don't even mean the sexual kind although that is included. Not the kind of life I want to lead. Life is meant to be shared, not put up barriers with other people. Also, clickbait article is clickbait.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:36 PM
5

Well how would you get followers of your idiotic illogical cause if they actually had critical reasoning capabilities? It's easier to lead a sheep around than an actual thinking individual.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:26 PM
1

I like how there's a human rights commission in Canada but they won't do a damn thing about this even if he complains. Goes to show you what kind of window dressing these state-driven equal rights enforcement organizations are and how the other state-run organizations are there to back them up as part of unwritten policy.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:48 PM
3

Fear IS the actual goal. Do you not understand that yet? Without fear, you don't get compliance with policies. Without compliance to policies, you don't get the malleable mind these paid brainwashers need to satiate their desire to indoctrinate people to their way of thinking and maintain their power.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:32 PM
3

Always write "signed under duress" on either side of your signature before you sign. Most people including the university idiots who draft these agreements don't know what this means, but the courts do: it means that any agreement has a very serious chance of becoming nullified and the coercive parties being subject to discovery through subpoenas should it be challenged. That, in and of itself, becomes a news event.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:27 PM
11

These women are criminally insane. There is no other description for what I saw in that video. For that matter, so are the police who failed to take action and the media for whitewashing and ignoring this event. These were gentlemen in the truest sense of the word. Thank you for posting this.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:16 PM
1

I've had this happen before a few times. Mainly what I do is stop before they walk into me, and this is with me walking as far right on the sidewalk as I can and pull out my phone. At that point, if you still run into me, it's all on you since you want to be the human battering ram with me as the target.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:13 PM
1

It's the volume of issues directed at one gender that leads to this conclusion. Personally, I believe everyone should have equal rights, and not turn a gender-based movement into a revenge plot as many feminists have. You shouldn't be discriminated against because of what you inherently are. That goes for male, female, trans, whatever.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:08 PM
3

Same thing that's wrong with the "Huffing on Post". Brain damaged idiots pushing a shitload of clickbait articles to more brain damaged idiots.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:04 PM
2

Joe Friedberg is a sociopathic cunt. The problem with all these cases is that the victim ends up in enormous conflict by needing to lie about the relationship in an environment where there is enormous social pressure on one side and power from the offending party and while feeling enormous guilt. The problem isn't the victim, but the attitudes of Joe Friedberg and those like him.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:02 PM
1

Shhh stop questioning the methodology of the study! We can't have people actually discovering the truth! What would the poor feminists do if that happened?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:45 PM
2

At the very least, use Adblock + Ghostery in your browser for sites like this. Make sure they at least don't get paid even though they count clicks. Using the Google Cache or archive.org are certainly the better options.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 05:39 PM
1

What a waste of public resources to have to deal with those four pathetic idiots, and what a sad commentary on the culture that makes it acceptable to take that type of justice based on the flimsiest evidence into their own hands. I hope that this is a deterrent to someone doing this again, but I doubt it with some of these animals.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 09:22 PM
2

The description of SRS in the link is golden though, and applies to the feminism subreddit too. The humor is the drug! "Imagine a bunch of monkeys that are using group-think to hate fuck a football like a bunch of inmates on a conjugal visit with a hooker that owes them money. One monkey hates oblong things, another hates leather things, and still another just hates footballs. There is the leather hating monkey, the brown object hating monkey, the hater of things with white stripes monkey etc ad…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:42 PM
5

If the system doesn't deny and bury the truth, how can it be sustained? Where will all the money come from when the men are no longer forced to pay? Keeping up the anti-male narrative is paramount you know.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:28 PM
1

I hope they go to the police with this and have these assholes exposed and charged. As a victim of crime, I believe they may be able to retain their anonymity.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 10:00 PM
8

This is what happens when you're useless at every other productive thing in the world. You make self-contradictory idiotic content and attempt to be the shining light for the world.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:05 PM
1

OP has to assume that the courts will 100% side with the child. This means that it doesn't matter what contracts are established for this type of arrangement, particularly if the contract is considered unconscionable by the court. It doesn't even have to be the mother protesting it. Particularly if OP even has the possibility of making a lot of money but doesn't, the courts can assign far more child support than is proportional to his salary simply because he could be making more due to impugned…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 03:25 PM
1

What do you expect from a bunch of anti-male assholes? I'd love for someone to make a claim against SF on this same basis for some other female-dominated profession and see how the fuckers squirm.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 08:23 PM
18

The false accuser's idiot attorney is really doubling down on this in a way that doesn't make sense. It's one thing to make a statement supporting your client, but FFS don't model yourself after March 2013-vintage Baghdad Bob. She was obviously caught in a lie and doesn't want to admit her error in fear of possibly getting charged with perjury.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 07:06 PM
7

Just look at the economic devastation one very disturbed person and one very politically correct law has brought on all these people involved. Between the police investigations, the legal proceedings, the costs to the foster care system, the loss of productivity, the health costs due to stress and everything else, the total is likely well into the millions of dollars. Can we not change the laws to name accusers only by initials, and sweep all legal records clean after acquittal and the appeal ti…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:36 PM
2

Any kind of attention-seeking behavior gets eyes on their ridiculous cause. Why should we expect anything less by now?
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:23 PM
2

All men should be taught this instead of capitulating to the bullshit of crazy liars.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 05:47 PM
5

Exactly. What the fuck does "irresistible" even mean? She had a legal obligation to inform her sex partner of her affliction. I wish she'd find it irresistible to stick her fucking head in an oven.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 04:42 PM
2

Glad you enjoyed my use of that term. I'm not underestimating judges' propensity to piss on said third rail. That sentence for framing with that type of material the woman got is completely ridiculous. That's why I had the disclaimer.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:38 PM
20

As cynical as I am, I'm not sure any judge will touch that political third rail since she's now technically a sex offender. I think she's done as a parent, and the father will get sole custody, possibly with supervised visitation if that. At least I hope to God I'm right on this one if there's any sense left in this world.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:00 PM
1

While that's technically true, I'm talking about enumerated inalienable rights that already exist as we have in the USA, not rights that the state grants that happen to be in a constitution as exist virtually everywhere else. Those EU rights can also be modified and/or revoked on a whim in relative terms, and the whole concept of a constitution is a sham in most countries around the world. Almost reminds me of the Uniform Commercial Code that underlies the legal framework of commerce.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 03:01 PM
3

Those can get overturned if an activist judge feels the terms are unconscionable. And by unconscionable I mean retaining the married lifestyle at the expense of 90%+ of the man's gross income. I'd advise you to look not only at the person you're marrying but their lifestyle and those of their friends and family, as well as any history of mental illness and your suitability for marriage. If your ducks are not all in a row, don't get married.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 08:31 PM
2

There is no bill of rights in the United Kingdom. All rights are granted by the state and are far from immutable and far fewer than ours here in the US. This is par for the course over there now. Expect systemic misandry from statist assholes willing to subjugate one gender in revenge for perceived wrongdoings towards the other gender.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 08:18 PM
1

Yeah but you're not a politically-correct asshole trying to prove a point under contrived circumstances. Reason has no value in their calculus.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:03 PM
3

So it's ok to initiate sex with people clearly less intoxicated with you, right? Even if they're still intoxicated? That does infringe on my rights as a man. Nobody should have sex with anyone if they're intoxicated, and everyone who participates in that act should be held responsible if the other person is intoxicated regardless of their level on both sides.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 08:49 PM
2

There's also no discussion of what appear to be serious ethical violations by this woman who is a medical doctor. Why hasn't she been dragged in front of her licensing body for such an egregious ethics violation? No patient should ever be subject to her care again in case this happens to them.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:21 PM
5

So if after their encounter one is still tipsy and the other is still drunk, and they drive, and are stopped by police and both blow over .08BAC, which one is responsible for DUI? Both, that's who. If she manages to drive to her destination safely, but trips over the curb and breaks her arm, is it her fault or the guy who just had sex with her for not stopping her from driving? You appear to be dodging a simple question here, but please answer how can then only one rather than both parties retai…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:58 PM
8

I think people here are upset because there are a lot of weasel words in the setup of this scenario and also never discuss the opposite where a man could be raped under the same circumstances. What if this man while tipsy was being raped by a woman who is outright drunk? Do you think that couldn't happen? Tipsy could mean one drink or it could mean blowing over the legal limit for a DUI. The account is also lacking context and details. Both parties could say they were raped and the man couldn't …
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:57 PM
3

Wouldn't it have been nice if she had extended the same courtesy to the accused before talking to fucking Rolling Stone goddamned magazine about publishing her story? What a fucking hypocrite this UVA accuser is.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 02:43 PM
37

Only if he got a paternity test before signing the birth certificate. Because, you know, fraud on her part doesn't matter if this other guy got her pregnant and the state doesn't consider that when making the man who was cheated on the financially responsible party anyway.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:16 PM
36

I would've either pulled that label off or written "and men" just below.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:04 PM
47

The problem is that the courts and laws are wrongly trying to maintain women's social status relative to the husband, particularly at the time when they were married. This has always bothered me about divorce and alimony since there are big efficiencies when two people or more live together in the same residence. The only good news here might be, absent a radical supreme court in the UK, that appeals can only be considered if there are serious procedural or "constitutional" rights issues (since …
/r/MensRights08/12/14 09:50 PM
1

Yeah, I know :(
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:12 PM
1

There's a much better strategy here, and that's to get the publisher to sue Lena Dunham for lying through her teeth. Unless this was a work of fiction, the publisher was defrauded by her story. All Barry has to do in this case is say "nope, I didn't do it, there's no proof and she lied about me" and the preponderance of evidence will fall in the publisher's favor. More than likely this will eventually be posted to /r/pussypass.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:43 PM
2

This is an ongoing issue in Brazil with criminals. The court system is absolutely fucked up there.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:40 PM
6

Its amazing how calling attention to inconvenient details automatically makes Mr. Bradley an immediate target of irrational attacks. I have a lot of respect for him for standing his ground and now he has been vindicated. Let's see what his "critic" has to say, though I bet all we'll hear is crickets.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:37 PM
20

Well how else are you supposed to make a living cooking up stories if you can't break a few eggs in the process?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:30 PM
7

Well if I ever want to test my ability to not blow my top, that's the video to watch. What a fucking pile of shit from these lying fucks.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 10:43 PM
68

Rape culture is unbridled hysteric revenge on men by radical feminists and their ignorant white knight male compatriots.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 10:30 PM
14

"Comins argues that men who are unjustly accused can sometimes gain from the experience. 'They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration." Catherine Comins, you are an inhumane and sociopathic cunt who doesn't even deserve to shovel manure for a living. By your logic, attempted rape is a character-building experience, right? Fuck you wherever you are.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 03:29 PM
17

That at least is understandable. The misandry of Target Australia is totally unacceptable when it ignores what the game is actually about.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 03:26 PM
31

How in the fuck can this sociopath be anywhere but deep within a psychiatric prison? What she committed was outright child abuse of a horrendous scale. What is this kid now going to think? I just feel bad for the rest of the people in the UK who put up with that type of "legal" system.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 06:01 PM
1

Yessir, you're ultimately 100% correct. 11 years old at the time or not, she and/or the other idiots that enabled this situation should be made to pay some type of penalty.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:03 PM
1

He even got kicked out of MSNBC! If that's not enough of a statement on how awful you are as a journalist, nothing else could be.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 06:02 PM
2

Yeah her "ignorance" bullshit stinks right through my screen. I'd definitely want to know if someone who did something to me, supposedly or actually, was out of prison. Just for my own safety. Or maybe this is really how ignorant she is.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 04:55 PM
6

sarkeesianed [sar KEE see and] (verb) to subject someone to comments of sexist misandry, from an individual with low intelligence and critical thinking skills and high attention seeking behavior to publish a comment on social media against men without basis in fact Example "The men's rights movement was sarkeesianed again on Twitter"
/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:30 PM
9

This and other pages are why I will never donate to Wikipedia. It is most definitely not an independent source of information, and this is only the latest example (and do a search for "examples of Wikipedia bias" if you need more).
/r/MensRights17/11/14 04:20 PM
22

The ridiculous hysteria around women's issues is fueled by a media machine sandwiching politically correct viewpoints on one side and desperation for ratings on the other. Events like this are a symptom of this problem. Destroying someone's reputation and career for those reasons is even more despicable.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 04:11 PM
2

At this point, it's time for Mr. Witt to lawyer up and file a massive civil suit against the institution and against Does 1-50 for fraud and tortious interference. Subpoena the hell out of everyone, find the accuser and anyone involved, and subpoena their e-mail providers. Make an example out of all of them.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 04:57 PM
2

I wouldn't worry about what your family thinks so much since they're likely victims of the nearly-visible undercurrent of misandry in our institutions and media. What I would suggest is to call them sexist the next time they disagree for failing to advocate for equality among the sexes and for tacitly advocating that only women are weak and require government protection. Remember that there is no such thing as reverse sexism.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 04:48 PM
4

Notice also that this is the same nonsense she pulled when she claimed she had a death threat made against her - tweeting about it within an hour of finding out about it. I don't know about you, but social media would be the last thing I'd be worried about if someone said they were trying to kill me. She is an attention seeker with some serious personal issues.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 07:12 PM
6

This is why the alumni are part of a legal system, not always a justice system. It's also why due process is so critically important.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:53 PM
1

It's clickbait bullshit. You can't get people's attention unless you get past their desensitization by the broader media. Obvious troll is obvious, though there is clearly that level of provable derangement in the radical feminist world.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 03:54 PM
1

This is what happens when the state gets too involved in people's lives with hidden agendas. Read this article to understand why even in your country Jose Mujica would practically encourage such a system to hold power of the state over people and create jobs for state workers.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:23 AM
1

Although Emma filed a criminal report with the NYPD against Nungesser, she has learned from the district attorney’s office that pursuit of criminal charges would result in another prolonged investigation and adjudication that would not be resolved during the remainder of her time at Columbia University. Thus, over two years after the incident, Emma remains dependent on the University to determine whether Nungesser remains on campus." Wrong. Emma is an adult and needs to file charges like any oth…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:50 PM
1

Tom Leykis called on men to put tabasco in the condom years ago. Basically, every man who uses a condom needs to take the condom off and either flush it or wash it out in a bathroom, then put hot sauce in it, or simply pack it out with the rest of his stuff in a plastic bag.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:47 PM
1

These are the same idiots who suggested in a documentary about the weapons trade in the Balkans that some fringe right wing group here in the US would acquire WMDs from these Balkan traders and use them against the US population on US soil. Right...turn my own homeland into an uninhabitable wasteland... Logic and truth are not fully in Vice's vocabulary.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:38 PM
13

Bingo! That is the exact game they play. The whole point is to make it impossible for all but essentially wealthy people, i.e. only 24% of Americans at most, to be able to appeal. The rest are cannon fodder for a blatantly exaggerated narrative perpetrated against people having their due process rights violated. These victims become a statistic, and it looks like Mark Twain's claim about statistics being the worst of lies is correct. Meanwhile, the system plods on and destroys more people. The o…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:28 PM
2

Objectivism isn't a perfect philosophy by any stretch and I'm no Randroid, but the themes in Atlas Shrugged are eerie in the way they predict the interference of the state in people's lives and the ensuing power grab. This quote is pretty much the centerpiece of why I think relations between the sexes in terms of divorce courts and child custody are so utterly broken, the presumption of guilt for sexual assault cases with nothing but accusations, and the ridiculousness of laws governing things s…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:54 PM
31

"“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 02:34 PM
1

I know, I know, and that's why I said "might" and use that term loosely. I'm realistic on that point if nothing else.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 05:57 PM
14

So many judges seem to not understand the law themselves. Besides, $1500 is poverty level even in the sticks of Florida. This isn't even about child support where at least some helpless kid might get the money. This is straight up state-sanctioned extortion and systematic destruction of a man's life.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:32 PM
2

OP: This is a very good and well reasoned post. I'd like to add a few things to this. On the spiritual/personal improvement side, I suggest joining a volunteer organization and a support group, and if religious join a local church/synagogue/mosque/temple/whatever. One of the things I read in your post is that you've isolated yourself from other people when there are actually many people who are going through what you have/are and worse. Surrounding yourself with these people while reflecting and…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 01:59 PM
2

The point was to ask why it was a bad deal. In the process of attacking a traditional institution, a system that was exceedingly punitive against men was created, whereas it was much less biased against men previously. Only in that sense are the reasons why (e.g. tradition) moot. EDIT: Understanding historical context, whether or not we want to believe in it, is important to understand how to try to solve the problem in the future.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:36 PM
2

The destruction of traditional marriage has been in the plans for the statist sociopaths for many generations. Read this article to see exactly what I mean. The Bolsheviks despised traditional marriage because it was tied to traditional institutions (e.g. the Orthodox church) to which they were literally violently opposed and tried to break up. More importantly, attacking traditional marriage could create dependency on the state rather than self-sufficiency. That the article was written in 1926 …
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:20 PM
4

Regret is rape in the current legal environment; especially on college campuses in the US. So much this. Also bears quoting some Ayn Rand (and no, I'm not a Randroid, but so much truth to this): “There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.”
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:12 PM
3

Well one question I have is whether or not they controlled for the "conscientiousness" variable, i.e. of the boys who WERE conscientious in their planning, preparation and execution, how did they compare against the girls? I also wonder if they control for other variables such as girl-focused programs, socioeconomic and family status, and so on. I seriously wouldn't take one study at face value representing the entire problem. It's an oversimplification.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 05:51 PM
1

You are 100% right, though I fear OP may be subject to negative implications because these same people are so zealous for their preconceived notions of gender. Suppression of the truth is paramount in their minds.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 06:05 PM
1

Just wait until their next round in court. This video will be worth its weight in gold for any such action.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 08:49 PM
3

This bullshit always reminds me of the intro to Busta Rhymes' Gimme Some More...goddamn, there ain't no more, is there? M: Hey, how you doing baby girl? I noticed you from... across the way, and... I think me and you should get to talking W: Whatever M: So... If you're not doing nothing later on tonight maybe you can come to my place? W: and? M: Baby girl, you know how much money I got? Oprah does my laundry W: So what? M: Michael Jordan cuts my grass W: Big deal M: U know how frivolous I am? I …
/r/MensRights05/09/14 03:35 PM
6

This is where her logic fails. If she was "forced" to sign the papers, was she "forced" to participate in the wedding? Was she "forced" into having three kids? Was she "forced" into spending years with him? I don't know about you, but anyone who was trying to force me to sign a piece of paper would be in my rear view mirror pretty quickly and any threat of force or actual force from then on from that person would be met with criminal charges against them. It's more likely that she was looking fo…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 03:29 PM
2

This is done to encourage dependence on the state. They are destroying traditional institutions to wrap their tentacles into the private affairs of individuals. You can't have power over people until you create a trap or problem for them to fall into.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:53 PM
1

Well that and the fact that she's demonstrating what ridicule she brings upon humanity for being a bottom feeding sack of puke.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:03 PM
25

Why in the hell are these women, who are legally defined as rapists, allowed to even be near children? If these men are going to be made to pay by the state, then give them sole custody of the children without visitation and remove the child support order, or allow the child to be put up for adoption. This is the only sane way around this problem.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:54 PM
2

I'm willing to bet that Dr. Phil or his staff knew about this and did their sympathy piece anyway? Of course, I'd expect no less from someone who got a push from Oprah Winfrey.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:51 PM
2

This is why I advise all male students not only to steer clear of having sexual relationships with anyone associated with their institution, but to promote the same on their respective campuses using flyers and other activities. The reason is the recent changes to federal guidelines for post-secondary institutions regarding Title IX discrimination for sexual assault cases that have completely abrogated the rights of accused students to any due process. The notable exception would be North Caroli…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:08 AM
4

The HuffPo distorting the truth? That would NEVER happen... /sarcasm My favorite part of this article is how the HuffPo decided they would just sweep their "error" under the rug. Bunch of fucking radical assholes.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:03 AM
8

The problem here seems to be that Title IX discrimination cases have come about as a result of the current federal administration's mucking with the entire US college system and its promotion of the Duluth model as a way to reduce the supposed epidemic of campus rape. Since 2011, this has resulted in multiple expulsions with horrendous violations by colleges of their own codes regarding due process. The net effect is to leave hapless students wasting what are literally years of their working lif…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:51 PM
1

Fucking Channel 7...
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:05 AM
3

The rights of the individual should not be trumped by religious freedom. This goes far beyond that point. Much as some of the stone-age morons from other cultures who believe that multiple marriages with people unable to consent are limited by the laws of our country, so it should be with these poor helpless boys. This should be 100% illegal everywhere in this country, no exceptions. You wait until that person is age of majority and able to consent legally before you pull a stunt like that.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:57 AM
2

She's at least guilty of disorderly conduct, and probably guilty of extortion.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:40 AM
2

That was criminal extortion. I would've filmed this if I had that kind of threat. She'd never work again pulling shit like that on people.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:37 AM
9

The family of bogans who were complaining were definitely put on parade by A Current Affair. It isn't news unless they're making their viewers angry.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:36 AM
8

The judge is a big part of the problem, surpassed only by the morons who put her in that position. Best part is that you can't even defend yourself as a victim without getting charged. Fuck these worthless countries and their out-of-control progressive agenda.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:49 AM
2

The only saving grace is that her name is now public and the video is now public, and any company with a decent background check system will reject her right away for this. I sure as hell wouldn't want this lunatic working for me with this reputation. But it is small consolation compared to the bigger problem of sexism.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:04 PM
1

Exactly - this idiot not only assaulted a minor for imagined reasons, but the interference with government officials should have been an automatic reason to imprison her for some length of time. The only way probation would have been acceptable is if there had been no physical contact and she had made a legitimate mistake. Neither applies here, but the sexism in the system sure does.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:57 PM
4

OP, one more point: it's important to get multiple videos over a period of time to demonstrate a pattern if possible. Even a month could help. More importantly, and whatever you do, please DO NOT put yourself at risk if you feel you will come to substantial bodily harm doing so. Having multiple videos will greatly strengthen your case in any legal proceeding and you need everything you can at this point because of the bias against men in legal proceedings.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 03:37 PM
6

If even a shred of the accusations are true, I hope this kid takes all these bastards to the cleaners. This is some AAA-grade bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 09:06 PM
3

This just one hideous mouth-breather too out of countless others. I feel so sorry for this kid. I can only imagine the torment he's going to get from people who know his mom wanted to abort him because he's male.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:36 PM
2

Tough luck? I bet spreading the tag #hettyjohnstonisanasshole would be tough luck too, wouldn't it? And while we're at it, why don't we just post #nswpoliceareworthless
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:32 PM
14

Two X is also a default subreddit for reasons I still don't full understand, but for which I suspect there is extra care not to interrupt the hegemony of the hive mind that made it so. The abrasiveness admittedly made such a challenge pretty much dead in the water with the response as described as above.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:37 PM
31

You bring up an even more fundamental issue: WHY IN THE FUCK IS THERE ANY PERMANENT RECORD FOR A MINOR ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE OF THE INSTITUTION ITSELF?!?!? I swear, these guys put the "institution" in educational institution. It starts from the first fucking day you walk into school and ends when your chosen career path is inaccessible because a college pulls up something you did when it was still almost acceptable to shit yourself.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:28 PM
3

Even if it's more difficult, understand that this very well could help build a case against a corrupt judge who blatantly disregards the law due to a later screw-up, or used by a candidate in an election to help sway voters to their anti-corruption platform.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:36 PM
2

Oh the editors very much read this article. This article is inflammatory click bait nonsense. The woman who wrote the article and the book is obviously unable to use reason to make her point despite all of the non-sequitur arguments she attempts to bolster with statistics and anecdotes. Instead, she falls back on sensationalism like all of the main shit media playing into the daydream fantasies of so many feminists while attempting to provoke the very anger by men she would use to help justify h…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:09 PM
1

Try reading here I really hope you don't let this go. The ROTC is probably liable for any future harm as well as what they've already done to you. It may be a tough fight, but I would expose these bastards for what they are to prevent other people from having the same issue in the future. Good luck to you.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:57 PM
16

#wilwheatonissexist
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:46 PM
3

Where the hell is the appointment of a guardian ad litem in this situation? Of course, that could be a frying pan into fire type of situation too. It really does suck to be a guy sometimes.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:05 PM
1

...and thus you have stared into the face of pure madness...
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:01 PM
8

In these fiefdoms formerly known as educational institutions, they make the rules up as they go along. It's the very definition of insanity, and is actually the result of institutionalization itself. It doesn't matter if you follow their rules, because they'll change them or interpret them as they see fit. This is why a lawyer once told me to really stay clear of any situation in college that might ever require you to go in front of a tribunal, to be as arms length with people of the opposite se…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:58 PM
40

I always thought of reverse racism as favoring a particular race; like affirmative action. FTFY
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter