TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

whiskeyjack1 Archive

View 0 posts and 180 comments by whiskeyjack1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

do you do that often? burst into random conversations (in this case its long over) and make a pointless statement that no one asked you for? you must be fun at parties, also "go read some -goddamn- books"? seriously? edit: haha i can't get over it, it's like you thought "i want to sound tough and intellectual at the same time" and then you went with "go read some goddamn books" it's hilarious-
/r/MensRights06/10/13 10:16 AM
-5

ok mister smarty pants, according to this definition of discrimination, it isn't even something bad, so please tell me why people get so upset about it? maybe because this definition has nothing to do with how the word is used nowadays which is: (Sociology) unfair treatment of a person, racial group, minority, etc.; action based on prejudice and this hardly applies to not wanting to date fat women. in case you ask why it doesn't apply: because not wanting to date someone is not unfair treatment,…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 12:43 PM
-2

no it's not, it is called a matter of taste. discrimination has to be done deliberately, no one can blame you if you don't feel attracted to fat chicks, and you can't change anything about it either.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 12:06 PM
-1

it is hardly discrimination if you have a preference when choosing a date.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 11:20 PM
2

well, she's clearly being a bitch and should be fired, but i don't see what this has to do with mens rights.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 08:48 AM
11

i agree that this sub sometimes is more women's wrongs than men's rights, but i also think bullshit posts are met with a healthy attitude by most people here.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:34 PM
3

the nerve of some people...
/r/MensRights02/10/13 10:41 AM
9

if feminists are allowed to claim that feminism allowed women to vote, we should claim that the MRM invented the wheel or something.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:18 PM
14

is she still trying to blame her failure on her gender? one would think it would start sounding hollow even to her by now.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:45 PM
1

i have yet to see anything like a programming seminar that is for men only. as far as i can tell, something like that simply doesn't exist, and if it did, all hell would break loose.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:28 AM
2

i go to a university with almost twice as much female students as male ones, but there is a huge number of women only events every month. it's just retarded. it is often stuff i would be interested in, but it is women only and there is no similar event where men can participate. it is really infuriating.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:07 AM
9

those bad rhymes always make me cringe.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:11 AM
5

go away
/r/MensRights22/09/13 11:44 PM
0

so should we all admit to be rapists as well? as the logical next step? yeah i see how saying that feminists are right in every point will totally destroy them.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:55 AM
37

not gonna lie, that's pretty hilarious. "men die younger anyways, so why spend on their health?"
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:05 PM
9

the article is open to interpretation, but it's highly likely that it is a parody of women, who say this kind of stuff regularly when coping with rejection. men rather complain about "being too nice", rather than too intimidating. at least i have never heard a guy say something like that, but plenty of women.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 02:09 PM
22

you can interpret it as you want i guess, but i think it's a parody of women thinking they "intimidated" their date when he wants nothing to do with them. that's something you hear women say quite often, along with lines like "he can't handle a strong woman like me anyways". in reality the guy was just not interested and the women try to justify the rejection they faced, pretty much like the guy in the article. men rather get mocked for complaining about the friendzone.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:30 PM
29

"haha men are totally like that... what you say this is actually about women? no women are not like that you misogynist!"
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:52 PM
1

it is funny how this statement is all proof for the existence of misandry you can ask for. the simple sentiment of "women have it worse, men should not complain, ever." i thought this "you are a man, you have it easy" stuff was growing old, but obviously i am wrong there.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 11:32 AM
28

ofc she calls him a misogynist. there was literally nothing he said that indicates hatred for women on his part, he did not speak too fondly of his exwives, but how can that be considered misogyny. people should get educated on what misogyny means, the word gets thrown around way too much.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:34 PM
3

i would just go to the womens bathroom, what are they gonna do? there is no alternative so they can hardly complain. are the male students there really accepting this and just hold it in or what?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:09 PM
9

iirc, you get a compensation for being imprisoned as an innocent person, it is some fix amount per day you spend behind bars. he can still sue the woman for compensation as well, but that's not part of this trial.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:00 PM
10

while i would not let anyone, that is close to me, die instead of me, i don't see why should value the life of some woman i never even met higher than my own. i see the point with children though, i think i couldn't leave kids behind on a sinking ship.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 12:56 PM
3

why anybody would think that circumcision is reliably preventing infections is beyond me anyways. that sounds like something a doctor in the 16th century might have considered plausible.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:01 AM
-10

i hear you man, women don't even accept the mens restrooms as men only space. since i moved in with my girlfriend, i find it really really hard to find a place without women. i love living with my girlfriend, but spending time without women, just with guys, to talk about guy stuff and crack stupid jokes etc is nice once in a while. but it is simply impossible to go somewhere and not meet women. even when watching football in a sports bar, there will be women, most of them don't even watch the ga…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:39 AM
5

someone should tell those people, that men sexualizing women (and vice versa) is the reason they are alive.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:23 AM
1

i don't get it, i only superfically followed the whole schwyzer thing. wtf is that guy? is he like totally mental? is he serious? why do people keep talking about him, if he is only remotely as crazy as he seems to be? i first read about him when he had this breakdown on twitter and i was like "that guy needs help, but what does he have to do with mens rights". still could not figure it out though.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:28 PM
6

it's because everyone is telling women that they are smarter than men, so they started believing it. if someone points out a field where men do better than women, they get called a misogynist, so all women hear is that they are "as good if not better than men" in every single aspect of life. no wonder they think they actually are after a while.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:52 PM
2

i would say that the MRM is a movement against issues men face, women issues are covered by other movements. i feel like being misogynistic or a bigot is not tollerated at all here though, which is a thing to be proud of.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 01:25 AM
4

so what are those understandable reasons? i never heard a single one. maybe americans don't understand that, but for us europeans circumcision is like cutting a babys ears off and saying "that's so he does not have to wash them or get them infected, also his mom thinks it looks better this way". just plain idiotic.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 01:03 AM
5

i am an atheist as well, but i don't demonize anyone like he does.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:53 AM
2

he just names single incidents of cruelty that happened in islamic countries and blames muslims as a group for it, typical hate speech.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:52 AM
1

believe it or not, but muslims are just normal people like you and me. if you judge christianity by it's fundamentalist crack nuts it doesn't look very appealing either.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 01:09 AM
2

it is true that feminists ignore the struggle of women outside of their country, mostly because they don't benefit from helping them, but he is always talking like islamic people are all cruel, insane monsters. literally every muslim i know is a good person, i even call some my friends. not a single one of them is a misogynist, so probably it is not the religon that is the problem here. he should get his facts straight.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 01:00 AM
1

ok i'll watch the rest of the video. hope he will get to the facts soon. edit: nope can't make it. he just won't stop painting islamic people as subhuman monsters.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:54 AM
4

idk, whenever i watch one of his videos, i feel like he is really condecending. my reaction is always "you are not telling me what to think" and i close the video after half a minute. guess i will never be a big fan, but that could be just me. edit: just watched your second link until 2:00 and imo it's a load of islamophobic crap. i can safely say that i don't like that guy and can't be bothered to watch the rest of the video.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:43 AM
3

create your own subreddit. call it r/lookingforwomentochangediapers please.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:40 AM
1

but seeing men as disposable is something that you can influence and does not have anything to do with hormones. with knowledge you can overcome the normes imposed on you by instincts. why don't you try it?
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:48 PM
2

reproduction is as pointless as everything else, there is no beginning and no end, reproducing just so your offspring can reproduce makes no sense. biology is primitive and a life that is only dictated by instincts and urges is a sad one. dignity, respect and equality among others are things created by humans, they are in a different dimension. their persuit is a lot more important than simple reproduction, something the lowest lifefrom manages to do. just because social norms derive from biolog…
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:43 PM
1

you must be a very simple human being if you think reproduction is all there is to life.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:32 PM
3

you don't get the concept. every human being is born with the same intrinsic value and therefore deserves the same rights and respect, saying men are worth less than women at birth is simply sexist.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:24 PM
3

anarchist calling others idiots, oh the irony
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:12 PM
4

i don't think you know what intrinsic means and i fear my english is too bad to explain it properly. basically an intrinsic value is a value you have just because you exist, not because you have done something to earn it. if you think men have to prove themselves in order to be worth something, you don't think they have an intrinsic value. also your post is misogynist and misandrist at the same time, quite the achievement.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:08 PM
5

just a tip, if you want discussion here, you have to accept the premise that men have an intrinsic value as a human being and are not disposable because they can't have babies. if you don't agree to that, discussion is moot because we will never agree on anything.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:57 PM
7

your position is so backwards that i can't even be arsed to argue with you. it's like some guy coming to a physicist board and saying "yeah i don't think objects fall to the ground when you drop them, debate me"
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:47 PM
11

so what does it tell us, when your entire life depends on your lawyer and not the laws that should be there to protect the innocent and punish the guilty?
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:32 PM
2

you are an asshat.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:34 AM
1

it is not polite to go around and tell people to smile. you don't have any idea what happened in that persons life. maybe their mother just died and the last thing they need is some random jerk to tell them they should smile. just my opinion, but wether i smile or not is none of any strangers business, so they can kindly keep their opinion on that matter to themselves. it's not harassment though
/r/MensRights04/09/13 12:06 AM
24

this. if anyone pulls a knife on me, i try to get as much distance between me and that person as possible. i have a black belt in hap ki do and actually know how to defend myself against an attacker armed with a knife, but it is literally never worth the risk if you can just run away instead of fighting. if i can not run away however, i will attack with full force at the first opportunity i get, regardless of the gender of the attacker.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:27 PM
6

i don't know if it can be considered harassment, but it's fucking annoying when someone tells you to smile while you don't feel like smiling. it's just dumb and people simply should not do it, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:19 PM
3

i guess it's a joke.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:47 PM
3

1/10, have a downvote for effort.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:28 AM
11

agreed, you can totally be for the equal and fair treatment of women as an MRA, and stand up against injustice suffered by women, but that does not make you a feminist. a femnist is someone that believes in the patriarchal oppression of women with men as a group as perpetrators. people that don't believe in that are not femnists and should stop calling themselves that, because that promotes feminism, something no one in their right mind should do imo.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 04:36 PM
24

yeah i actually read some feminist author complain about the "91 cents per dollar" somewhere. we are getting there. not sure if it's the article you posted, because i really can't bother to read yet another piece about this topic.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:05 AM
9

feminists propagate the idea of a patriarchal society, naming it as the main reason for almost every problem there is. this is false, dumb and illogical. it shifts focus from the actual sources of the problems, makes their solution more unlikely and thus keeps mankind as whole back and society in an unfair, imbalanced state (plutocracy), because the actual perpetrators of oppression can not be identified properly, because the mainstream media is filled with "patriarchal oppression" bullshit. tha…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:38 AM
19

so what? she got nothing before they got married either. why should she be entitled to anything? no matter what she says, the fact, that she will have as much after a divorce as she had before the marriage shows that she wants to marry him for the money and not for love or what ever she says she wants from a marriage. also she seems to be very certain, that she will divorce him some day, or she would not bother that much.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:36 AM
3

well, it's basically slavery. one person is sentenced to work for the other person, without receiving any benefits from it and with no way out.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:38 PM
1

so the women has more of a right to live of the money the man makes, than the man himself?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:18 AM
6

this just crossed my mind: would sex bot not solve the rape problem, at least as feminists see it? feminists claim that men rape women because they can't control their urges, thus the "teach men not to rape" shit. technically feminists have to agree, that if men can use a sex bot, they won't have to rape women anymore. obviously that's not how it works because rapists are not normal people and get some thrill out of overpowering and raping their victim, so a sexbot will not be able to substitute…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:55 PM
66

funny, vibrators are technically sexbots as well, yet no feminist seems to mind them. would be hilarious, if the lady that claims sexbots could destroy family life and influence marriage and divorce, owned a vibrator. sadly we will probably never know.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:18 AM
-1

holy crap, what a non-issue. attention whoring at it's finest. "we want to run around topless, that's why we run around topless".
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:52 AM
6

nothing in the sidebar hints at misandry and the topics are all normal gaming topics as far as i can tell, are you trolling?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:04 AM
14

yeah the comments were really uplifting, i read until page 2, and every single one told her she was a complete fucking moron.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 01:29 AM
1

how is that related to feminism oO
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:39 PM
11

it's because people realize that men don't have it easier than women and face a lot of problems as well, so feminists claim they know about these problems and got them covered. it is the next best thing after simply denying those problems exist, something they don't get away with anymore.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:59 AM
2

this isn't even remotely funny, anti-mras getting desperate it seems.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:48 AM
4

feminist men will claim that "all men are rapists" is nothing a "real" feminist would say. you know, because feminists are for equality and stuff. it does not bother them, that people that call themselves feminists, and are accepted as such, run around propagating this, and that they support this by calling themselves feminists as well. because they are morons.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:32 AM
6

yep, that is pretty accurate.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:26 AM
3

why do you go there anyways, it's not like you can reason with those people, they just ban you when you post something that is not completely in line with their ideology
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:30 PM
32

"Hospital staff have felt bound to keep the secret from him" why the fuck... that's fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 08:34 AM
18

how can you say something that stupid and not feel bad about it? i mean, no one would say "the world would be a better place if women were barred from x", because that is an incredibly stupid thing to say, yet people say stuff like that about men all the time and don't even feel ashamed for that obviously wrong and stupid statement.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:07 AM
1

i refuse to feel anything about this
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:56 AM
5

i don't care if it's a boy or a girl, accusing a 10 year old of rape is fucking dumb, and i stopped calling myself an MRA quite some time ago because this movement is making the same mistakes as feminism and is slowly turning into a blind, hateful and unreasonable mob, that goes nuts when someone challenges their views. this is the perfect example, the problem is that a 10 year old is charged with rape, that is a perfect example for rape hysteria, and that's what's wrong here, not if it's a girl…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 03:04 PM
4

"44% of women were bothered when the man expected them to help pay" seriously? that's really shocking, i didn't think it was still that bad. maybe because most women i dated had no problem with sharing the bill or paying for cinema when i payed for the food, i didn't even have to ask in most cases. seems i was rather lucky in that aspect.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:54 AM
11

yes, that is what i mean with "impossibly stupid".
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:45 PM
27

that's unbelievable, how can a 10 year old rape someone? what are they gonna do, put her in jail? the american justice system is so impossibly stupid, i lack the words to describe it. land of the free my ass.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:44 PM
6

hope they lock that crazy bitch up for some years, she is seriously dangerous.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 12:16 AM
1

that's a troll if i ever saw one.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 11:29 PM
1

people that throw around stuff like that don't even care if it is plausible, it is just blind hatred.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 01:13 PM
1

meh, you wont find anyone you can convince in places that are moderated like that anyways, so why even visit them, unless you are masochistic of course.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:38 AM
-1

also: is this graphic legit? because it shows that women earn less for the same work.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:50 PM
3

i would simply refuse to run the errand when i get compared to a dog for doing it.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:39 AM
10

if your definition of equality is something like "give women free stuff", then yes.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:36 AM
3

where is the part that shows the allegation was wrong? i don't expect it to be in this video because that is clearly biased towards the woman, but is there any footage that shows what happened in the waiting room? and why was the marshal fired if the allegation was wrong?
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:54 AM
1

feminism actually preaches the very opposite, namely that women are powerless victims of men, and men hold all the positions of power and own all the money. which is not true by the way. but i am tired of reading through your badly thought out ad hominem arguments, if you actually want to believe that if suddenly 50% of the workforce would quit working, we would not notice it and that a statistic that shows what 27k out of 65k women do as a profession proves that, so be it.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:11 AM
1

even if all jobs listed there were something like "professional nose picker", the statistic still would not show what the video claims it does.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:47 AM
2

the jobs displayed sum up to 27k, it says in the first line that there are 65k women working. 27 is not even 50% of 65k, also in the list are jobs like nurses and teachers among others, how are nurses and teachers not important for humanity? on top of that the statistic shows that, in many of the listed fields, that are so unimportant for the survival of mankind, as the video states, women don't even make up 50% of employees. the statistic does not even say anything about the jobs men choose, so…
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:23 AM
1

is this some kind of false flag operation to make this subreddit look bad? that is the only explanation i have for this.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:12 AM
2

first of, this list does not even encompass 50% of all working women, also there are jobs listed like nurses, teachers and several types of managers and supervisors. all of this does not at all lead to the conclusion that men make up 98% of important jobs that are needed for the survival of humanity. it is just bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:03 AM
2

so women make about 50% of the workforce if i am not mistaken, yet men have 98% of the "important" jobs? if that was true, wtf are we doing here? i should become a feminist instantly, their theory of the patriarchy seems to be right after all. oh wait that's total bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:36 AM
1

i bet you especially liked the rock music and the pictures of men getting jobs done. and if it's really one of the best videos you have ever seen, i wholeheartedly suggest you to expand your horizon.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:23 AM
1

the video is cheap propaganda aimed at simple minded people, nothing more. rock music, colons of numbers without label and statements like "if all women stopped working right now, it wouldn't even matter" give it away. a down vote is all that deserves, hating women is not part of the MRM.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:06 AM
1

wtf is this, some pictures of colons of numbers without label, rock music and text suggesting that women don't do anything worth while. is that supposed to be a joke or something? "if all women would quit working right now, it wouldn't even matter" what a load of crap.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:02 AM
6

depends on the kind of push ups though. if you do them correctly, with elbows at your side, 30 is pretty tough.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:37 PM
40

but why would women need less upper body strength to do the job? it makes no sense, same with fire fighters and police officers. why lower the bar for women? either you have the required strength or you don't, why wouldn't women have to fulfill the same criteria as men?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:09 PM
4

if you want to get banned here, you have to try harder.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:01 PM
18

having worked as a barkeeper for a few years, i know that not only unwanted sexual attention is a problem for men, but also when you complain about it, you get ridiculed. drunk women would grab my ass or chest or run their hands down my spine on top of saying all kinds of obscenities. while i never minded the talk, being touched when you don't want to is a really ugly feeling. and when i told them to keep their hands to themselves, i would be called "fag" or something along the lines more often …
/r/MensRights26/07/13 02:07 AM
1

exactly, if they just talk some nonsense to themselves, i don't mind.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:59 AM
2

well i think arguing for the sake of not letting them get away with spewing bullshit is a honorable cause, though i understand why ppl my think its tiresome and not worth it.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:52 AM
10

i disagree, i think it is important to call people out on bullshit, not to convince them, because that is usually not possible, but to not let them influence people that listen to them, without being challenged.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:47 AM
3

it takes practice. read a lot, for example cicero was a brilliant debater but is also easily understandable. once you have some practice in recognizing logical fallacies and weak spots in arguments, arguing with feminists... well it doesn't get easier, because they don't give a shit about logic and such, but they won't talk you under the table anymore with their bullshit, because you can call them out on it and you can stand your ground much more easily.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:45 AM
1

was this woman on drugs? first she comes with this "rape is bad, mmmkay" shit when rape isn't even the topic (false rape accusations are a crime in itself and don't have anything to do with actual rape, if a rape accusation is false, no rape happened and there is no need to talk about that) and then she proceeds to threaten the two guys with rape and later accuses one of them of being a rapist. total fucking blackout, no sane person can write stuff like that without feeling ashamed.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:51 AM
6

this is an article especially about women on death row, fathers are no women usually.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:41 AM
19

which is the reasonable thing to do, once you found out you got an over sized, spoiled four year old as a wife.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:31 PM
80

also he helps with the bills... wtf man spend your money on yourself, if they can't afford the house but you can, you live there and they move out. if they want to live in the house they can not expect you to pay for it, seriously...
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:49 PM
7

amen brother. the argument that men can take wealth from women is totally retarded, how am i supposed to take the money of some women? i have no legal way to take the wealth of women in my family, let alone women i don't even know. just the usual feminist patriarchy bullshit without evidence.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:38 PM
1

viagra is not covered for men where i live.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:04 PM
28

women centers (no men centers), introduction of officials that only deal with women's problems, women only scholarships, meetings of political nature exclusively for women, dear colleagues letter... are the things that come to mind immediately but i am sure there is more. i go to a university where women make up 63% of all students, yet there is a "women's meeting" where only women are allowed to take part and where women only topics are discussed. women hold 63% of the votes for the students pa…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:47 AM
-1

while i see where you are coming from, you said "they (women in general as i understand it) just arent good at it..." this is not an acceptable stance, and while it sucks that you have to deal with the shit you mentioned, it doesn't make women as a whole bad leaders, it just shows that the company you are working for has some very shitty personal policies.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:02 AM
3

that is an unfair generalization, and also you seem really bitter.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:55 AM
1

i don't know what your sources are, but ad hominem is latin for "to the person" and means that you attack your opponent and not his arguments, an emotional appeal is a different fallacy, which i didn't commit either, at least not more than you did by saying that women are seen as baby machines. that was a tu quoque argument by the way and i am totally aware of it.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:42 AM
1

ad hominem is as argument made against your person, instead of your thesis, which i never did. if i said something like "arguing against you makes no sense, because you have been brainwashed by the feminazi doctrine of the patriarchy that oppresses all women everywhere all the time, even when they get advantages out of the resulting treatment", that would be ad hominem. glad to be able to clear that up for you.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:04 AM
76

imagine it the other way around, claiming that men are better learners, smarter, cleaner, just generally better human beings than women. oh the shit storm. but saying that women are better than men, yay equality. the best point was "we graduate college more often". yes you do, after colleges were rearranged to cater to the needs of women for decades. before that, men graduated more often and it was called oppression of women. the bigotry is unbelievable, when men graduate more we need affirmativ…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:49 AM
4

i repeat, how is thinking that women are by default better at caring for children misogynistic. why is the one that get's the benefit of full custody in the vast majority of the time, because the common perception is that she is better at dealing with kids, the one that is discriminated against, and the one that gets told he is unfit to care for his own children and all he will be good for is to pay the bills, the oppressor in this scenario. how can you say this is the fault of men and patriarch…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:33 AM
5

why do you think feminism has anything to do with equality? because they say it? HA!
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:20 AM
38

"Women now control more than half of the private wealth in the U.S. and make 80% of all purchases. According to Boston College’s Center on Wealth and Philanthropy, women will inherit 70% of the $41 trillion in intergenerational wealth transfer expected over the next 40 years." http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/18/brill-women-philanthropy-intelligent-investing-wealth.html so that is that. i think men are disadvantaged, because they don't have a powerful lobby, like feminism is for (certain types of) …
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:16 AM
1

so is birth control covered for men? or do we get abortions cheaper? how is that in anyway systematic oppression of women.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 01:58 AM
3

what the fuck is misogynistic about thinking that women are more loving and nurturing, while men are violent creeps and should therefore not be awarded child custody? how is that misogynistic, explain it to me at once. obligatory "this word you keep using, i don't think it means what you think it means"
/r/MensRights25/07/13 01:56 AM
2

he is not paying child support anymore, he still owes the mother money for child support he didn't/couldn't pay when he still had to (at least that's what i gathered)
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:40 PM
0

meh. not very insightful.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:30 PM
7

that sounds absolutely insane, apartheid is only a few steps away it seems.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:10 AM
5

nice read, and i am especially glad this article appeared in the FAZ, arguably the german newspaper with the best reputation. the only thing that bothers me is how the author talks about how it is the patriarchy that disadvantages men, while all the points he makes clearly show that there is no patriarchy in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:07 AM
40

it is funny how feminists so frequently claim the systematic oppression of women, yet can't give a single example of a law that favors men over women, while every MRA can give you at least 5 examples of systematic discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:39 AM
2

she is acting totally insane, but i don't get why this is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:20 PM
7

wtf am i reading
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:16 PM
7

i don't see what morals and integrity have to do with being a man or a boy, it is just a cheap shaming tactic from her side. "A man looks for a woman with intelligence, who is supportive, grounded and encompasses a shared set of values when choosing a partner. A boy cares mostly only for girls who are hot, wild and exciting." you can totally go for one night stands with hot girls if you want that, without losing your status as a man, it is just inconvenient for her, because she probably is not h…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:58 PM
2

she still does not have a say in who is a boy and who a man. she simply does not get to decide that and it is pretty arrogant
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:46 PM
12

saying that parents can do what ever they want with their children is indeed pretty stupid.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:21 PM
1

yeah you are probably right, i am just having a bad day.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:13 PM
19

care to explain?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:14 AM
25

every single one of the unreported rapists was severely abused by his mother, which lead to psychosis. prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:13 AM
28

but it is not harmful. no one ever got hurt by being looked at.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:55 PM
7

yeah everyone has an IQ of 140+ on the internet. but her being a women explains why she thinks it's ok to kill people accused of rape. the way feminists manipulate the law, women can't be accused of rape, so she is perfectly save. privilege severely unchecked i would say.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:50 PM
14

ha! that actually made me laugh.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:24 AM
10

i so want to see how this guy reacts when someone comes to kill him for a crime he didn't even commit. what a moron.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:04 AM
2

what ever floats their boats. it does not deserve the attention it gets though.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:01 AM
6

no, i was being sarcastic, thought it was obvious. poes law and shit
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:59 AM
13

yeah chopping off a part of your body so you don't have to wash it seems perfectly reasonable.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:39 AM
3

it is supposed to do exactly that, show that men statistically work in more dangerous areas, which also provide a larger income. feminists want to change the income gap, but don't mind that women usually work in jobs that are a lot less dangerous. it is hypocrisy on their part.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 01:02 AM
25

it's just a dumb joke, who cares. i think people that try to tell others what they are allowed to laugh about are a lot worse than bad jokes.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 12:58 AM
5

just don't. don't ever argue with feminists, it is fruitless and frustrating. if they could use logic and think reasonably they would not be feminists.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 09:45 PM
10

hoped for an interesting read from a different perspective, but it's the same "yes there are men's rights issues, but women have it much worse and we have to solve their problems first" shit you hear from every feminist these days. at least they have to admit that men face adversity, something they would not do a year ago.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:58 AM
10

but when you want to go in there, they tell you you have to use the back entrance because this entrance is for women only, and you know what's up. can't imagine this is working.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 10:51 PM
1

actually the Y chromosome is the most evolved chromosome there is. http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2010/y-chromosome-0114.html
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:29 AM
5

it's not illegal, it is just scummy. bars and clubs are usually in private hands and the owner can charge what he wants from whoever he wants. it is different when it's an event that takes place in a hall of event center that was funded with tax money.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:52 AM
3

just don't go there. when ever i see something like "entry: men 5€ women free" i just refuse to go there, i rather spend the night at home than giving in to that shit, and by being consequent about it, i got the most of my friends to not choose locations that have these kinds of policies when they plan the evening.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:50 AM
1

just another feminist statement that no one with half a sane mind can agree with. feminism slowly but surely disposes of itself. less work for us i guess.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:46 AM
12

that's what struck me as well. it makes absolutely zero sense.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:28 AM
7

the man is charged with a lesser crime, so obviously his sentence will be lighter. anything else would be stupid.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:24 AM
12

because "her body, her choice", unless of course, she chooses to do something which feminists don't want her to, then it is totally ok to physically attack her.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 12:41 AM
5

not much you can do, if she is a true feminist, she won't care about facts and logic as long as it contradicts her treasured beliefs of patriarchy and the general victimhood of all women. but i don't let her brainwash the rest of your group with her shit, call her out on her bullshit when ever you think it's necessary, but don't make the mistake to believe she is wrong by default, that might make you look like an ass on occasion.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:22 AM
13

"This happens occasionally, though compared to men trying to force women to get pregnant against their wills, it’s so rare that it’s comparable to shark attacks in its frequency." yeah men force women to get pregnant all the time... not. what kind of bullshit did the feminist propaganda machine cook up this time? boy i wish i could just shake my head in disbelief and proceed to ignore this crap, but sadly people like her have way too much influence and way too many people listen to them. probabl…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:56 AM
18

yeah but he illustrates how men usually get the shitty end of the stick, which is what it all comes down to in the end.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:13 PM
10

i will probably start an organization called "How are you doing?" and sue everyone that uses this phrase.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:39 AM
3

land of the free, right?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:37 AM
2

ah, good, someone posted it so i don't have to. everyone who replies to this thinly disguised troll attempt must be new to the internet.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:27 AM
2

so where are all the feminists that are outraged about those calls for gendercide? why is andrea dworkin still allowed to call herself a feminist? where is the announcement that "the scum manifesto" does not represent feminist views and the author was a crazy murderer? that book is even cited on some feminist sites, and just because they say it is "hilarious" does not make it less disgusting. if you are for equality, do everyone, foremost yourself a favor and stop calling yourself a feminist.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 02:17 AM
3

feminists believe in female supremacy, not equality. you should read some of the feminist 101 books, in which the extermination of the male population is propagated. feminism is a hate movement, that sees men as the primary cause of all evil and (all) women as the victims of (all) men. by calling yourself a feminist you support this ideology passively or even actively and I have no interest in talking to you, as basically you want me dead or at least support those that want me dead. if you are f…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 01:12 AM
7

i feel that feminism is challenged more and more. while feminism was thought to be something good and needed by progressively thinking people, the intellectual elites now turn against feminism, and that is just the beginning.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:56 PM
1

i disagree, feminists are feminists. feminists share the believes of rad fems or at least acknowledge them to be legitimate points of view, otherwise they would not call themselves feminists. the third option is that they are badly informed and don't know about radfems and their man hatred and just blindly throw around feminism paroles without actually knowing where those come from and what's behind all that. those people deserve our contempt as well, so yeah everyone who calls him/herself a fem…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:25 PM
15

it is funny how saying "women are better at x" is totally acceptable, but saying "men are better at x" usually causes a shit storm.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:16 PM
4

so we should not look at things with one gender in mind, but at the same time consider women issues more important and neglect men issues? yeah except for the first part that is a pretty accurate description of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:25 AM
5

i don't get it
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:09 AM
4

well i certainly won't cause any harm to have those notes, so why not?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:06 AM
2

wait, taking off a condom during sex is rape? in america i guess?! that is pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:22 AM
1

there are some guys in the comment section arguing with some feminist gamer that, as usual, claims the victim monopoly for women. it is really painful to read, she just can't wrap her head around the fact that every one gets harassed while playing online games, regardless of sex or race, and that it does absolutely not indicate that gamers are generally misogynists. also for every loudmouth insulting someone, there are several players who do not say a word, but they just draw no attention.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:45 PM
0

that's because women are better at everything, that's why educating them is more beneficial than educating men. men are dumb and evil, and education is wasted on them. women on the other hand are pure and good and will only do good things with the education which also helps other people. basically you should ban all boys from school since they only take away space that could be used by girls. luckily our western society is on the way to kick boys out of school all together. boy i can't wait for …
/r/MensRights09/07/13 09:52 PM
3

if lie detector tests were remotely accurate, why would their use be limited to false rape accusations and not every crime there is. sadly they are not nearly accurate enough to convict someone of a crime, only based on a detector test, which is why they should not be used in any trial ever.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 09:45 PM
128

so... why did you and your wife help her at all? i am sure i would not have stirred a finger to help her with anything.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:16 PM
1

god that chick is so annoying. the way she talks, there is something in her pronunciation that makes me furious.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:46 PM
3

what a load of crap
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:26 PM
3

i laughed more at the beginning because i thought the woman was doing a parody. please someone tell me that was a parody.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:26 AM
6

agreed, it's ok to make jokes about men. getting all up in arms about something like this is for feminists.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 07:31 AM
14

as stated above, the doctor she first went to advised against a circumcision and told her about the risks, and she simply went to another one that seemingly has to problem with a pointless amputation performed on a healthy newborn. so she has to take a major portion of the blame.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 07:10 PM
34

her doctor told her it is a bad idea, and according to you she said "it is MY son and i want him to be circumcised", which makes her a horrible person in my eyes.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:15 PM
56

i am always shocked by this "it is my son, i do with him what i want" argument. do those people actually think they own their child, like some object they bought? please tell your friend that she is a horrible person, also kudos to the doctor for not acting in his own financial interest and recommending what is best for the child, sadly that is a rare sight.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:58 PM
5

that's called prostitution.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:51 PM
2

but she is saying she saw OPs father be in pain because of infections he had. so either that is a coincidence and OPs father had infections that had nothing to do with him being circumcised or not, or she was lying.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:35 PM
2

just because something is done for 1000s of years does not make it the right thing to do. imagine what life would be like if we did everything the way we did 1000s of years ago, so that argument doesn't hold.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:33 PM
8

why do so many people talk about infections that people get because they are not circumcised. i read this everywhere, in almost every thread on every forum or board i frequent, that deals with this topic. i live in germany, literally no one here is circumcised and no one i know ever had any infections because of it. are there some kinds of bacteria that infect the male foreskin, that only exist in america and not in europe? because i swear, the number of posts that say something like "we had two…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter