Like everyone else I am basing my opinion on what was written. Nowhere does it say she consented. Silence is not permission. Especially after saying no repeatedly.
Your analogy is terrible. Rape and panhandling are two very different things. And all of us are basing our argument off the same thing. Very little information. But based on the information provided nowhere does it say she consented. Now if we had more facts I might change my opinion entirely. But based on the information we all have she was raped.
That is the dumbest argument I ever heard. We are all basing our opinion on what was written. You are assuming she said yes. If it said she did I wouldn't be defending her.
I am basing my opinion on the information provided like everyone else. At no time did she say yes. She said no repeatedly but he kept going. She finally got tired of saying no. At no point does it say she said yes or gave consent.
It doesn't say she said "ok fine". It said she said no over and over but he wouldn't stop. She finally stopped saying no. She never said ok. If she had I wouldn't be defending her.
There are varying levels of rape. From date rape where she says no but he does it anyway all the way to violent beat the shit out of her rape. They are all still rape.
