TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

whitemonster_enjoyer Archive

View 3 posts and 144 comments by whitemonster_enjoyer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Everyone hates something. You probably hate incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 03:34 PM
1

found their literal pictures, This collage was from purge week two years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/gf2jnq/the_high_value_women_of_fds/ You are so obsessed with FDS you made a post making fun of them..... and have dozens of comments talking about their standards, their looks, and anything negative you could possibly think of. Women do this with MGTOW, TRP, and incels all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 12:10 PM
3

FDS (generally speaking) affects nobody else and is easy to ignore FDS affects the unlucky men they will choose as their victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 12:08 PM
1

How long did it take you to find FDS members pictures and make a collage of them Like 10 seconds. This collage was from purge week on this subreddit a few years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/gf2jnq/the_high_value_women_of_fds/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 12:05 PM
2

Since when is it not worth it to work towards something that’s hard to get? Oh to tell the truth I'm not really thinking about their interests first. I'm thinking of the poor guy they're going to pick as their victim. So it's better for men if they don't "try". It seems like you’re bothered because their expectations are “impossible” I'm not bothered at all I just enjoy making fun of them for being clowns.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 11:05 PM
0

If all you want is NSA sex and don't want a relationship,ask for exactly that. If you're already getting laid then you don't need to ask for it...... because you won't lead people on. No one is leading anybody on. Just because a guy has sex with you doesn't mean he wants to stop having sex with other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:49 PM
-1

It’s not worth the hassle of dealing with men who don’t meet the standards, they would rather be alone and happy, working on themselves. Sure, that's fine, good even. It's better for men if they just go their own way instead of ruining some poor guy's life. But if it's hard for you to find a guy that meets your standards then it's still accurate to say that you can't afford to have those standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:49 PM
-5

I don't know, what does anyone "gain" from ridiculing retarded groups like Nazis, nice guys, communists, pagan larpers, etc??? I like doing it simple as.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:17 PM
-1

Why do you visit a board that explicitly does not cater to you and tell them what they "should" be doing? Because with their high standards and low value, that's the realistic option for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:14 PM
-2

No one is "complaining" about FDS, we are ridiculing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:12 PM
1

You're a big girl. If you want something you can ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:12 PM
1

I mean, what woman doesn’t want a handsome guy who’s hung and committed to her? I mean I'm sure all women would love to have a guy like this but that's not realistic so they settle for less. FDS women won't settle and they're not the best-looking themselves, so they might as well be WGTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 09:41 PM
-2

Also the idea of women having standards takes away women from their pool I explicitly said in my post that it would make more sense for to FDS to just rebrand as WGTOW. Can you read or are you illiterate?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 09:39 PM
1

Some women can afford to have high standards. FDS women cannot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 09:35 PM
1

For the purpose of enjoying their suffering? Absolutely. That was the point of this point, schadenfreude. It was supposed to just be flaired "Discussion" but the mods made me change it to a CMV. And incels should be hated for obvious reasons. If you're hating a group then you're not just enjoying their suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:28 PM
1

"Chad" is just shorthand for "very attractive man", different people draw the line for that at different places. I and many others think that if a man can easily get casual sex with average and above average looking women then he is a "chad".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:25 PM
1

So whenever a woman posts about redpillers, MGTOW, or incels, they're living in her head "rent free"?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:21 PM
5

I do. Casual NSA sex with less attractive women does come easy to them. But hot women know their value and usually aren't content to just be their fuckbuddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:20 PM
-4

I don't care. I have literally zero consideration for the interests of FDS women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:12 PM
-2

when they can have multiple hot women. It's not that easy for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:11 PM
1

I meant "you" in a general sense.....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:09 PM
1

or, hear me out. muscular men are more likely to post. I could apply similar logic to FDS. The least ugly women are the most likely to post. If these women are their "best" then their prospects are worse than I though. but in adjacent subs you’ll see the same men Which ones?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:05 PM
1

These women, on the other hand, are living in your brain rent-free. So any group of men you've ever made a post about is "living in your brain rent free". Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:04 PM
0

If all “they” do is seethe…. They aren’t the ones that made this post. I made one post. They created an entire community and at least half of it is dedicated to hating men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:03 PM
4

I know several 100k+ earners Lots of men earn six figures now, especially in HCOL cities like San Francisco or New York. Six figures isn't what it used to be. married to women who look less attractive than some of these women. I would bet money that these women aren't anywhere near as unpleasant as FDS women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:00 PM
2

especially since people usually specify locations when they have exact numbers Not in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:59 PM
1

The majority could not Then they would be better off focusing on being happy and satisfied without men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:59 PM
-1

and choosing to be alone if they can’t find a man who meets them. Yes, hence the WGTOW comment at the end. Chances are they won't be successful if those are their standards. Maybe it’s easier to believe that because if it was hot women who would never bang you FDS attracts women who have trouble getting men(or hot men I should say) to commit. Hot women have no trouble locking down "chad". Hot women generally don't end up on FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:57 PM
1

If you have to eliminate a large number of people from the data pool to make your point, you should consider that your point is flawed lol I mean when an american says "the average male height is 5'9" they're eliminating all non-american men from the pool. "Average" doesn't mean "average of literally all men" or "average of literally all women".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:42 PM
0

Not being politically correct =/= hateful
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:41 PM
-2

How are they any more hateful than you? lol I don't hate women. Nothing I've ever said here suggests that I hate women. You guys really need to stop clinging to the delusion that the women who don't want to fuck you Plenty of women don't want to fuck me, that's not what this is about. Why is it always about sex with you women? I'm indulging in schadenfreude when hateful low-value women with ridiculous requirements can't find men that satisfies their requirements.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:39 PM
-1

I never specified what subset of women they are considered "average" compared to. A 5'4" man is around average in Indonesia but is considered very short in the west.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:33 PM
0

Guys don't post selfies in TRP. When PPD has the occasional selfie thread most of the redpill guys are pretty fit and muscular.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:28 PM
2

You think those women are average-looking? I mean the elephant in the room is that most Americans are overweight or obese. If you exclude fat women and significantly older women then yeah, they're average or below average. Jesus, the men here really are delusional lol I find most girls around my age I see in public to be better looking than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:27 PM
0

Sure, even landwhales can get plenty of matches on Tinder. But do they find these men attractive? And are these men willing to give them the kind of relationship that they want? I'm leaning heavily towards "no".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:24 PM
4

they’re no worse looking than men that post in TRP Do you have any photos they can have whatever standards they want, same as TRP Sure they can, and I can decide that I will only settle for a unicorn as a pet. But I'll never find one. When someone says you are in no position to be making certain demands they're saying you won't be able to get those demands met.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:22 PM
1

I've lurked here for a while and rarely see posts about FDS. It is flattering for them Don't you mean "it is flattering for us"? who claim they are deluded losers. If all you do is seethe then yes, you are a deluded loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:20 PM
1

Whether a change "improves society" is subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:18 PM
1

More specifically what is femininity today? Traits associated with the female sex. Whether its association with the female sex is due to social attitudes(like the color pink) or biology(being more compliant).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:15 PM
1

It's in my best interest if I wake up tomorrow morning with a nine inch horse cock. Doesn't mean that I should delude myself into thinking that there's a realistic chance of that happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:11 PM
13

Yeah, hence FDS should just rebrand as WGTOW due to the huge discrepancy between their own value and their standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:10 PM
-2

FDS women can want whoever they want, there is not a morality test for desire. I never suggested otherwise. Will they get who they want or the relationship they want? That will vary by individual. If that photo is representative of what they look like, then I don't think most of them will. Why are they such a threat that PPD keep posting about them? They aren't a threat. I just enjoy indulging in a bit schadenfreude when hateful women end up disappointed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:08 PM
2

isn't "x" a good thing from an evolutionary perspective The theory of natural selection is descriptive, not prescriptive. It describes what is. It does not say what ought to be, what is "good", what is "bad".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:03 PM
0

I don't know about that, perhaps they are better off going WGTOW. Better that than deluding themselves into thinking that women like them can get chad or brad's undying commitment. Or settling for guys that won't make them happy and whose lives they will make miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:00 PM
2

Also married men make more than single men. And their wives spend the money lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 02:55 PM
1

The rules say that discussion posts can be opinion posts though, its just the title that must be neutral. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/wiki/flair#wiki_discussion What should this post be flaired as? It's not really a CMV either.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 02:46 PM
-2

Keep your finances separate. Considering that married men make significantly more than married women this tends to benefit men lol. Do not bear his children, it will only unfortunately shackle you to him for the rest of your life. No it won't, half of marriages end in divorce and it's usually initiated by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 02:43 PM
6

So you want women to "lower their standards" Women can set whatever physical standards they want. Now whether they can find a man willing to commit to them with their physical standards is a different question. but at the same time "not settle" If you're not literally the most attractive man she's ever been with then she's "settling" to some degree. I think guys would worry less that women are "settling" for them if they invested less time and money into women, and were less willing to agree to …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:48 PM
1

so if you do romantic things for someone So it's easier to just not do these things, and number two is the way to go. Got it, thanks. Most people are monogamous and thus In relationships sure, if you are a boyfriend/girlfriend it's almost always exclusive. But hookup culture is also normalized. It's not reasonable to assume that someone is exclusive to you just because they're sleeping with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 09:58 AM
2

Monogamy is only the norm if you have clearly established a relationship. Hookup culture is mainstream. By not telling her about your side girls, you are lying by omission. Lying by omission is when you tell half truths. Not saying anything is not "lying by omission". Having secrets like that in a relationship is very damaging. Not volunteering information is not keeping secrets. It's only a secret if you try and hide it and lie if they ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 09:56 AM
1

Since we literally share the same opinion though this conversation can end No we don't. I never criticized assuming monogamy if it has been clearly established that you're in a "relationship"(in the romantic sense of the word). I'm criticizing the female tendency to assume that a "relationship" exists when it has not been clearly established, and therefore assuming monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:09 AM
1

When I said "sexual relationship" in my post all I meant was two people that have sex regularly. That's it. The word "relationship" here is not used in the romantic sense, but in the general sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:03 AM
1

I’ve noticed with some women that while we were exclusive it was a fucking nightmare, fighting all the time, one issue after the next, but when I downgraded (in my mind at least) them to being non-exclusive women I just slept with and did bf-gf stuff with whenever I felt like it, our relationships became smooth & ideal, they were paradoxically more committed to me and happier when I told them I would be seeing other people. Google "dread game".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:49 AM
2

Which specific actions referenced in my post or any of my comments constitutes "leading her on"????
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:46 AM
1

Because monogamy in relationships is the norm. Sleeping with someone doesn't mean you're in a relationship. To be in a "relationship" that has to be established first, and only once it is established can you assume monogamy. I'm not saying it's unreasonable to expect your "boyfriend" to be exclusive with you, I'm saying it's unreasonable to label a man your "boyfriend" just because you have sex and go on a few dates, when he has never labelled himself as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:44 AM
1

If she breathe......
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:39 AM
3

If you are withholding information you aren’t being honest. You know this. No, I don't "know this". Not volunteering information is not dishonesty. By that logic every single former slut who doesn't volunteer that information on the first date is "dishonest".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:36 AM
0

Does that include women with very high body counts not volunteering that information?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:34 AM
0

Lying by omission is telling half truths. Not volunteering information is not lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:33 AM
1

Monogamy is the norm tho. Not in the west Even if it was the norm that doesn't mean you're entitled to it, or that you should assume that it's the case when it hasn't been indicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:32 AM
0

Lying by omission is when you tell half truths. Simply not saying anything is not "lying by omission".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:29 AM
1

Body count is important to many men, does that mean women should always disclose theirs?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:29 AM
1

woman moment
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 09:54 PM
0

It's their own fault they're assuming exclusivity, and you have no way of knowing that they're assuming exclusivity unless they call you their "boyfriend". In that case, yes you should correct them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 09:47 PM
1

There are tons of things that can hurt a guys chances, including saying at the very start that he doesn't do monogamy like an autist. Volunteering this kind of information when you've just met is self-sabotage.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 09:35 PM
0

"If you don't commit self-sabotage then you're a jerk" 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 08:22 PM
1

I wouldn't be happy but I wouldn't call them dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 08:21 PM
1

I don't think men should care, this question wasn't asked to seek practical advice. I'm just curious what women think about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 07:38 PM
2

The onus is on her to declare her standards, but not you Never said she has to declare what she's looking for when she meets guys. But if she wants something from you the onus is on her to ask for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 07:16 PM
1

Lots of people have herpes. How common do you really think it is for people to disclose it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 07:14 PM
3

From a genetic standpoint, ideally a man is supposed to sire many children with different women No. Evolutionary biology is descriptive(what is) not normative(what ought to be). Men evolved to desire sex with a variety of women but that doesn't necessarily mean you "ought" to do it. That's subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 05:38 PM
2

👑
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 05:29 PM
-1

It's not a question of entitlement. It's the norm. It isn't. "Hookup culture" has been normalized in the west for quite a while now.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:58 PM
2

It's not "leading them on" if you didn't lie to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:57 PM
2

Maybe you shouldn't assume exclusivity if it hasn't been explicitly agreed upon or if you aren't referring to each as girlfriend/boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:56 PM
3

It's 16. There you go. That doesn't answer my question: "Is it also "lying by omission" for women to not disclose n-count?" You're letting them think you have a relationship with them and you aren't. That's assuming he knows that she thinks they're exclusive. Like if they were calling me their "boyfriend" I would correct them and I imagine most guys in that situation would.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:56 PM
2

As soon as you think about it and choose not to voice it you are actively hiding information. I don't think you understand what the words "actively" or "hide" mean. When you meet someone in order to establish any form of relationship, the form of relationship that you want and are currently in is not trivia. It is vital, basic information that the other party is owed. If a woman wants to befriend a man is she a "jerk" if she doesn't disclose that she's only interested in him platonically?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:54 PM
-2

Sure I can, but I'm already getting it so why would I? If she wants something more the onus is on her to say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:51 PM
-4

Sure it is. It's lying by omission. Is it also "lying by omission" for women to not disclose n-count? "Lying by omission" is when you tell half-truths. Simply not telling people things is not "lying by omission".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:50 PM
2

Uh, yeah, an active choice to not disclose relevant information means that you are deliberately hiding it. No it doesn't. Not disclosing information is a lack of action. There are tons of things about ourselves that we don't disclose to others. Does that always mean we're against them finding out or knowing, or we wouldn't tell them if they asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:48 PM
2

Not disclosing information is not the same as hiding it. A man can choose not to explicitly disclose the fact that they aren't exclusive without hiding it, like trying to prevent them from seeing text messages for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:40 PM
0

Not disclosing information is not dishonesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:40 PM
4

If she doesn't want NSA sex she can say so. She's a big girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:38 PM
-6

Uh, buddy, what? I genuinely don't understand what that first question is supposed to mean. Not disclosing information is not being dishonesty. and your partners deserve being informed about them. As I said there are countless things that may affect how others see you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:38 PM
-2

And don't fuck girls that are obviously wanting more than just sex. "More than just sex" doesn't necessarily mean exclusivity. If he was "nice" to her(let her sleep over, buy her gifts, go on dates, spend non-sexual time together, etc) This is "more than just sex"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:29 PM
1

Is a woman a jerk if she uses her simps/obiters for their money and attention No
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:27 PM
-3

Why do women feel entitled to exclusivity just because guys they're sleeping with do nice things for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:26 PM
-1

By being honest. Just tell her what you are after and what you want and don’t want Should women tell most men they meet that they aren't interested in a relationship? And why don't we all volunteer our blood type to every person we meet while we're at it. There are countless facts about you that may affect how people see you. Not disclosing information is not dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 04:26 PM
1

I never said it didn't happen, just that he's more likely to be exclusive with you. A "chad" with bitches pining for him is probably more likely to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 01:48 PM
1

And if I had the Infinity Gauntlet and could enslave the world I would. Stay tuned for more in "Pointless Hypotheticals" after the break. He can't. So you won't have to share him with other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 01:46 PM
1

It may not be ideal all else being equal they would prefer a guy that's not sleeping with other women vs a guy that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 01:27 PM
2

I've thought about this paradox sometimes, I just don't know if there's a name for it. It's hard to put it in words but I'll try my best. Basically, sometimes secrets will only help you so long as they remain secrets, if it's a zero sum game. If more people know about this "secret", it will hurt you. Like for example if you find a "hidden gem" restaurant and tell everyone about it, and it becomes popular, you might suddenly find yourself being unable to get a reservation. In the case of TRP, it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 03:45 AM
1

It's probably a snobbiness thing TBH
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 03:27 AM
10

Be her pimp and make her give you a cut of her earnings 🗿 #SigmillionaireGrindset
/r/TheRedPill20/06/22 03:10 AM
1

Are you so sure that these professions are less attractive? I certainly think they're a lot more masculine than most white collar professions. When you think of a "man's man", is he a lumberjack or a middle manager in an office?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 02:57 AM
2

How much time they invest in you aside, it's a fact that less attractive men have fewer options so it's easier for women to get in an exclusive relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 02:51 AM
2

This whole average Billy Beta bullshit will treat you like a queen if only you would stop banging Brad in the scummy club meme has not been the experience of many women I know. Average men are not " nicer" than hot dudes and in some cases more likely to be sullen/resentful and treat their GFs with indifference. "Niceness" aside, an attractive man has more options so he's less likely to be exclusive with you compared to a less attractive man. And exclusivity matters a lot to women, and to a lesse…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 02:45 AM
2

Maybe, but even if he is doesn't mean I want to be him. The whole point of the "blue pill" vs "red pill" dichotomy in the Matrix was the choice between a comfortable lie and an uncomfortable reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 10:03 PM
13

“Let’s take what a woman says and call it emotional nonsense so that we can loudly state we are the logical gender.” I didn't call your words "emotional". I am mocking the fact that you shill for male behavior that benefits women(raising other men's kids). I’m saying bravery and honesty are far more attractive Do you have autism? Not an insult, asking genuinely. Some things just shouldn't be shared with the world else you face ridicule from men and women alike. Not having a filter is bad. The mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 09:59 PM
29

"yes yes be a cuckold guys it's brave and attractive" woman moment
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 09:45 PM
4

This data has been proven false by researchers. Which researchers? Bring a corroborated study "Um has it been peer reviewed? Three times? Peer reviewed research is the only way to gain knowledge. Is it published in the most prestigious journal in the field? CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION. CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 09:03 AM
3

"any data that contradicts my narrative is fake news"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 08:57 AM
3

"men only want stacy"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 08:49 AM
2

My guy he was being sarcastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 08:48 AM
5

Only as a fuck buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 08:46 AM
5

I'll add "or at least is perceived that way" for you Women are compliant by nature. Women are more compliant than men in virtually all if not all cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 08:41 AM
3

I don't like to use the word "submissive", it seems too sexual. But yes, women are by nature more compliant and deferential compared to men. Think back to your days in school, who was better at sitting still and following instructions? The girls or the boys? I've met plenty of stereotypical feminine women who are the exact opposite of submissive. Well you can be feminine in some respects and less feminine in other respects.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 08:37 AM
6

Because men are typically generally to feminine traits and being compliant is a feminine trait......
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:15 AM
1

I see WAY more women gush over guys like Mac Miller, Pete Davidson and Post Malone than the Brad Pitts and Ryan Goslings of the world. Just be a celebrity bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 09:52 AM
2

The dating market place is changing simply because women don’t need men like we need women. They don't strictly need a man anymore but don't kid yourself, they still stand to financially benefit a lot from marriage. Married men outearn their wives by around 20k.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 03:36 AM
2

based mom wtf. be grateful you had a mom like that to give you good advice about women, most guys don't.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/22 08:20 AM
4

All of human history points to monogamy as “normal” (the most common). Research on pre-industrial societies suggests that 30% of these societies were "generally polgynous"(polygyny acceptable and more than 20% of relationships), and 50% were "mildly polygynous"(polygyny acceptable but less than 20% of relationships). Social monogamy(two people being in a couple and living together) and sexual monogamy(two people exclusively having sex with one another) are not the same thing. Extra-pair copulati…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 06:59 AM
2

because they don't have types like women do "he's just not my type teehee"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 12:04 AM
8

He was over 700 🧢
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 08:20 PM
1

What the fuck is masculinity Traits associated with the male sex. I have no idea how to be a “real” man If you are an adult male human then you are a "real man".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 02:19 PM
53

This should be obvious, but social desirability bias is very real and women will lie about their preferences if they think revealing their true preferences will make them look bad. For example, very few women will admit their (scientifically proven) attraction towards less agreeable, "dark triad", men.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/22 08:21 AM
4

Like Enkidu, these men had the potential to be Chad Many men can become decently sexually successful if they put in the effort but few men are lucky enough to be born with the ideal face/height/physical frame you NEED to be "chad".
/r/TheRedPill13/06/22 11:22 PM
3

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 07:15 AM
1

Men want marriage more than women do, especially in older age. Most men are socially conditioned to marry, it doesn't mean that they wouldn't be happy spinning plates. The new reality of dating over 65: Men want to live together; women don’t Seems like you're cherry picking a specific demographic. Of course men would love to cohabitate at that age, they're no longer working so they don't have to support their partner. Despite all of the rhetoric it seems that men inherently need companionship fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 02:53 AM
2

Sounds like a revenge fantasy lmao. Men generally enjoy having sex with many different women for evolutionary reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 02:51 AM
1

But do you think RP men would be okay with wifey set behavioral guidelines and punishments? No because it's bad for them. That doesn't mean they think the wifey is a bad person for setting behavioral guidelines and punishments.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 02:28 AM
8

I don't think it's fair to call people red pilled just because they are aware that attractiveness and social skills matter. I don't think that's what OP meant. Presumably was talking about the specific skills that TRP seeks to cultivate, things like aloofness, dread game, passing shit tests/comfort tests, dominance, etc. or men that want a traditional, submissive, conservative wife but still expect her to work, split bills, raise kids, and clean are hypocritical How many men want this?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 01:27 AM
17

Incels believe that the game is based entirely on looks, and that due to their genetic shortcomings they are doomed to celibacy. Incels don't believe that. There's an entire section on the incel wiki's scientific blackpill page about "personality", filled with research demonstrating that women basically prefer less agreeable/dark triad men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 01:24 AM
2

What would be an incorrect way to act? Whatever you think is incorrect. Who sets these standards? You do. Why would you assume a man who uses the word behave would have reasonable standards? Men and women are free to set whatever standards they want, whether they can find someone that meets these standards is another question. Is the woman allowed to set how the man should behave? Can she punish him with the silent treatment or dread? Women do this all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 01:21 AM
2

Cool still would nope out of a relationship where someone expected me to "behave" So there's something wrong with expecting your partner to act a certain way?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:59 PM
2

Ignoring The silent treatment is very common, you're being too dramatic. and "dread" There is scientific evidence of mate copying in humans. That is to say, women find men more attractive if they are desired by other women. Remember that for most of human history. polygyny was much more common than it is today.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:33 PM
2

Depending on the situation/severity/frequency of the undesirable behavior: Tell her you are unhappy with what she did Ignore her for a while Apply dread Nuclear option: dump her All of these, except dread if it's active, are normal/mainstream responses to when your partner does something you don't like. Of course she is a grown woman and can do what she wants but her actions may influence how he treats her. I mean if you don't like the word "behave" I can easily say something like "act in a plea…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:09 PM
2

What does it matter? I also hug dogs and children, does that mean it's "fucked up" to hug your partner? What's wrong with wanting a partner that acts in way that you like?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:04 PM
0

Behaving how your partner wants you to behave doesn't make someone a dog......
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 09:34 PM
2

It's a shock to many people because women are usually regarded as the less promiscuous/more committed/more romantic sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 08:37 PM
1

How else would they describe it? A partner that does what they want?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 08:36 PM
0

Most redpillers are open to upgrading plates to girlfriends and being exclusive, if that's not "love" then what is it? Just because they don't freely throw love at women doesn't mean they can't love.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:10 AM
1

I wouldn't say that. They don't use that word but when they describe relationships with what they call "well-behaved" LTRs, and the emotional investment/mutual concern involved, that's what it is. They just realize that "love" isn't really like how it's portrayed in Disney movies and female partners can very easily stop loving you. So you have to be able to accept that and move on when that happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:08 AM
1

she's up to 9 for what it's worth Ok Muhammad.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:06 AM
6

That story reminds me of the movie Titanic lmao. When Rose was an old widow she still loved the homeless guy she hooked up with on a ship for a few days more than her late husband. Because tingles. Granted, Jack did save her life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:03 AM
1

Going from 5’6 and a half to 5’10 and a half Really? I've read that leg-lengthening can make you like 2 inches taller max.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:01 AM
1

No proof they do. Plenty of proof, you just choose to be willfully blind. No it doesnt. Variance matters too. Yes it does. If 8 apples out of a basket of 10 are poisoned I'm not going to take and eat an apple. Even if there are some heterosexual/bisexual women that are not attracted to low-agreeableness, "dark triad", traits, we have no way of identifying them. So to maximize our desirability in the eyes of women we act like that way around all women that we're interested in. Not anywhere close …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 04:06 AM
1

Over half of these examples are problems with men and their behavior, not women though. The person you were responding to you never claimed that "blue pill" is only the fault of women. It isn't. Yes that poor poor husband who’s so unwilling or unable to take care of himself to the point where his wife feels more like his mother. Why are you assuming that the wife's complaints are accurate? You've only heard one side of the story. then they have a relationship with a total and complete lack of co…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 12:28 AM
3

red pill marriage Oxymoron. Legally binding yourself to one woman is the total antithesis of TRP. "red pill on hard mode". Yeah so is getting out of shape, so is chopping off your leg and becoming a cripple. Doesn't mean it's not a bad idea that's contrary to TRP. "Hard mode" more like "suicide mode".
/r/TheRedPill12/06/22 12:17 AM
1

The problem is with building an ideology around aggressive overgeneralization, like TRP has done. If most women act and think the way the TRP describes then it makes sense to treat all of them as if they act that way. To tell if one is different would require mind reading and unfortunately I'm not a psychic. I worded the title a little awkwardly. I mean that I think most RPers are unsuccessful and this is why I think that. All the research I have seen indicates that women are more sexually attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 12:13 AM
6

What is a "need" anyways? Something you will die immediately without? Then by that logic only food, water, and lifesaving medical care are always "needs". Shelter and clothing aren't "needs" in mild climates because you won't die from exposure to the elements.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:34 AM
5

The Reason I Think Most RPers are Unsuccesful in Dating Are they? How would you know? But you're trying to tell me that the men who've made an obsession of oversimplifying something as complex as dating are now swimming in women. Even if something is not applicable to 100% of women, if it is broadly true then we should use that knowledge to inform how we should interact with them. appeals to biology Humans are animals and the study of animal behavior falls under the scope of biology........ And …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:24 AM
1

men on the autism spectrum who want a relationship but can't get past the dating phase I don't think it's reasonable to blame women for not wanting to date someone who is severely socially impaired. It's unfortunate for autistic men but it is what it is. No different than people born with physical deformities. conventionally unattractive woman who can't get any guy to commit and give quality time Unattractive women absolutely can get a guy to commit. They're just bitter because they can't get ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 03:27 AM
1

See if you can relocate to NYC where the gender ratio favors men exponentially Any "man" that would relocate to Rat York for pussy is no man at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 02:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter