TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

whitey_sorkin Archive

View 2 posts and 356 comments by whitey_sorkin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, I did.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/22 11:59 PM
3

Well congratulations then, mission accomplished. No more need for feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/22 09:34 PM
1

NWA was done when they got together
/r/PussyPass09/07/20 08:05 AM
1

Always has been? Hilarious
/r/PussyPass09/07/20 08:03 AM
1

24 years ago he didn't have much money, so yeah, he earned pretty much all that while married.
/r/PussyPass09/07/20 08:02 AM
1

"Accused.me.uk was set up in 2014 by people who had been close to the victim of a malicious allegation of rape in 2012. With the help of friends, his wife, his family and legal team, he was not charged." Not a great source, completely biased, and as such will convince no one.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:15 AM
2

accused.me.uk doesn't seem like an unbiased source, it's a site for people accused.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:07 AM
1

Perjury is virtually never punished.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 11:30 PM
1

Nice source lol
/r/MensRights07/11/18 08:06 AM
14

Washington Times is a joke, complete shit.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 07:31 AM
1

Completely bogus post. This was the plan all along. Indeed, Cub Scout dens MUST be single sex, not coed. This isn't some feminist plot, it's the rules that were set up over a year ago. One might reasonably ask "then are girls really allowed in the BSA?" And the answer would be, "technically".
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:50 PM
1

This post is making false accusations.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 01:23 AM
1

Trans means female anatomy, male brain. What's a "male brain"? That's a different question, but men and women are quite different mentally.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 12:57 AM
16

She identifies as trans, but was born a female.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 08:49 AM
1

"The so-called ‘psychotically depressed’ person who tries to kill herself doesn’t do so out of quote ‘hopelessness’ or any abstract conviction that life’s assets and debits do not square. And surely not because death seems suddenly appealing. The person in whom Its invisible agony reaches a certain unendurable level will kill herself the same way a trapped person will eventually jump from the window of a burning high-rise. Make no mistake about people who leap from burning windows. Their terror …
/r/MensRights09/06/18 12:46 AM
45

Sad thing is many people probably think he got owned; in the same way many believe Affleck owned Sam Harris.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 08:53 AM
2

Males, upon turning 18, must register for the draft. That's the only law I know of that discriminates by gender. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_the_United_States Edit: added link
/r/MensRights04/08/17 07:44 AM
9

If she convinced him to kill someone other than himself, she'd definitely be an accomplice to murder. How's this different? Suicide is illegal, she's an accomplice. She'll get probation though because she's female.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:02 AM
0

As to your first question, I'd say there's just as much misandry going on in the world as misogyny. As to your second paragraph, I don't hold those opinions nor do they have anything to do with hating feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/17 07:23 PM
-7

Nothing you described qualifies as rape. Also, if you only "realize" years later, that's not rape.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 04:29 AM
4

Because there's a shit load of single mom's; virtually zero single dad's. (Actually, about 82% single mom's, 18% single dad's.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:38 PM
1

Yep, Lawrence Summers, Harvard. But still, a significant iq gap between men and women is not as well known or discussed as the racial iq gap. You're pretending it is, and getting pissed off at anyone requesting a cItalian.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:27 AM
1

It's not common knowledge. Even the gaps between races is controversial and not widely accepted.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 04:00 AM
7

Gonna really win over a lot of converts with that attitude, Darling.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 02:11 AM
5

You've got to back up ANY claim with proof. That's like a feminist saying, in response to a challenge to her theory of "patriarchy", come on! it's common knowledge!". That's not an argument and proves nothing.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 12:12 AM
3

Evasion
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:45 PM
3

Yes, I have a job; no, I'm over 18. Now, explain what the hell you meant in your incoherent comment.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 12:03 AM
2

What the fuck are you trying to even say?
/r/MensRights26/06/17 10:48 PM
1

Agreed. Most people are religious.
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/17 04:33 AM
1

Exactly, and most of the media still repeat the myth. It's not a mainstream understanding that it's pure myth; the general consensus is the wage gap is real.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/17 11:08 PM
1

Most people believe the wage gap.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/17 08:36 PM
1

Great point.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 07:49 PM
6

Sokal Hoax redux. Also, kinda similar to the "average person swallows 3 spiders per year while sleeping." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/spiders.asp
/r/MensRights20/04/17 11:02 PM
3

Then how come every post lately is just racist shit? Nothing to do with female privilege?
/r/PussyPass11/04/17 07:20 AM
1

What happened to this sub? Is it the r/coontown?
/r/PussyPass11/04/17 03:11 AM
1

There's an evolutionary advantageous reason to rape as well. Natural selection doesn't produce saints.
/r/PussyPass24/03/17 06:17 AM
1

You'd probably deny that violence is natural.
/r/PussyPass24/03/17 06:15 AM
6

You're actually claiming rape is rare in nature? Theft is theft, and again, rampant in nature; lions often come along and take meat from weaker species. This isn't even debatable. Deception is a constant throughout nature, see Trivers' work, yet it can't be defended due to it being natural. But your comment on rape takes the cake. You're a fool.
/r/PussyPass24/03/17 06:03 AM
5

There is an evolutionary advantageous reason for rape as well, who cares? Evolution does not produce moral beings, and part of being civilised is rising above human nature. You're simply dead wrong. Item 1 simply stated that racism is natural, this ok. I agree it's natural, and really just one manifestation of tribalism, but it's being natural is irrelevant. As to your first sentence, that's pure horse shit.
/r/PussyPass23/03/17 08:40 AM
25

1 is just the naturalist fallacy, i.e. natural = good. Rape, theft, adultery, murder...all completely natural. So that's a horrible argument.
/r/PussyPass22/03/17 06:38 AM
1

Cognitive dissonance tell: "I won't even dignify that with a response"
/r/PussyPass11/03/17 01:19 AM
3

Lower intelligence?
/r/PussyPass11/03/17 01:17 AM
8

Wrong sub. But the claim is certainly true, though the author avoids naming the cause. Why are there zero successful black nations?
/r/PussyPass09/03/17 09:07 AM
17

Neo Nazi?
/r/PussyPass04/03/17 07:58 AM
1

Total non sequitur
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:15 PM
7

Torrent link needed
/r/MensRights02/11/16 06:25 AM
0

My wife/daughter are both huge Hawks fans but I'm constantly having to explain shit to them.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:20 AM
-6

Don't seem like thieves, just confused
/r/PussyPass26/09/16 06:25 AM
4

These types are actually a tiny minority, just very vocal and bold. Remember a few months back, there was a story about some students petitioning to have an MLK statue taken down? Turns out it was like 2 students, but it makes headlines. Most of the campus madness we see is done by a very tiny minority.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 10:03 PM
8

Clumsy wording, typo, resolution is shit, cropped badly on the left side...
/r/MensRights18/06/16 03:54 AM
-11

Great idea, poor execution.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 03:01 AM
1

Fuck Brock Turner. MRA's need to stay as far away as possible from this guy, unless you want a PR disaster.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 05:49 AM
1

First, what is to gain, or lose, by speaking up? If it will entail consequences such as a bad grade, or harassment, why bother? As far as race goes, assuming you're white or asian, don't fucking touch it with a ten foot pole.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 03:37 AM
0

White women got the right to vote about 60 years before blacks.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 08:57 PM
-11

A single study, from another country, is pretty flimsy.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 11:39 PM
3

malelivesmatter
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:58 PM
-7

Just like the other "1 in 5" stat that feminists parrot, this one seems totally bogus.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:41 PM
1

Bullshit
/r/MensRights07/05/16 05:18 AM
1

Thanks, but non sequitur, that number comes from the work of Robin Dunbar.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:58 PM
1

Or "human". People have always worshiped celebrities (or the equivalent) and 90% of human conversation is gossip. Nothing new
/r/MensRights05/05/16 04:36 AM
1

As already noted, FMLA applies equally to men and women. But, given that the demands of child birth are not at all equal, why shouldn't there be a double standard?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:44 AM
1

No President, ever, will reinstate the draft.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 03:47 AM
1

Then you're good to go. Or are you planning on going back to this university?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:29 AM
1

If you don't even go there, how can they expel you? Are you facing any criminal charges?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:10 AM
-1

logic
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:15 PM
-1

My position has consistently been that private companies censoring is different than state censorship, no moving of goal posts. "That's censorship at its core, wow" Really? Not North Korea or China, but reddit mods, represent "censorship at its core"?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:59 AM
-5

I agreed with you, stop being a dick. There is a qualitative difference between state censorship and private censorship: one is legal, one is not.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:27 AM
-12

You are correct, but this type of censorship is entirely legal, was my point. OP cannot sue because he was denied his rights.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:38 AM
-21

The New York Times engages in censorship every day, by refusing to publish every article submitted.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:24 AM
-28

Nothing done on reddit is censorship; you're confused on the first amendment.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:13 AM
-4

*an
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:47 AM
-6

Do you see a slash fucking s? Stop being a pussy.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:33 AM
-7

What kind of fucking phone are you using? I'm on a phone and no problem at all, and I have shitty vision.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 12:11 AM
-22

Man up
/r/MensRights29/02/16 09:46 PM
16

This is ancient
/r/MensRights26/02/16 06:34 AM
1

When asked if he ever have her a roofie, she said no.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 09:50 PM
2

A fucking 1.8kg hammer.
/r/PussyPass23/02/16 03:15 AM
10

He didn't, he said that she referred to herself as that, which she does.
/r/PussyPass22/02/16 04:29 AM
11

In what way was he an asshole?
/r/PussyPass22/02/16 03:02 AM
0

I like your last point re outcomes, but completely disagree with the first point you make.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 08:27 PM
1

Uh, no. Feminism has a good purpose, if the society is ass backwards, like in the 3rd world. Just like 40 years ago feminism made sense here, it makes sense in 3rd world countries.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 06:57 AM
1

But most of what these people did was perfectly legal, what specific crimes should they be arrested for?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:26 AM
6

IMO, we live in an ANTI rape culture. Rapists are considered scum of the earth, e.g. Bill Cosby. Even in prison, rapists are the lowest of the low. Patents think pedophiles are around every corner, there are TV shows like to catch a predator. To look at our culture and come to the conclusion that rape is encouraged or tolerated is absolutely delusional as hell. Or consider campus culture: it could not be any more anti rape. Now ISIS, that's a rape culture, proudly.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:32 AM
-10

http://imgur.com/sIOlDvM
/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:04 AM
-10

Actually, I'm great at parties. This post doesn't scream made up to you? Again, I'll ready my words if any proof is ever posted. (Being pedantic/argumentative/abrasive online has almost zero correlation to how one acts in person, i.e. at parties.)
/r/MensRights03/02/16 04:46 AM
-8

Anyone making a claim, if they expect to be believed, bears a burden of proof. Not a shred of proof has been offered, and it reeks of sometime wanting to making a point re alcohol/consent. A point I completely agree with by the way. Obviously, he's preaching to the choir, and as such, evidence isn't needed, he confirms what y'all already believe.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 04:28 AM
-17

Burden of proof is on OP. Sounds like complete bs so he could rant.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 03:13 AM
-54

It didn't.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 11:47 PM
1

Nursing and teaching don't even require a college degree, what are you talking about?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 06:52 AM
13

"Those who own the country ought to govern it." -John Jay
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:07 PM
1

I've never seem a case of police brutality where the victim behaved politely towards the officer. Not one. And I'm old school, from the Rodney King era.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:01 PM
1

police won't fuck with you if they know they risk forfeiting their life doing so How's that working out for you?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 11:57 PM
3

I believe you'll find this interesting: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/10/18/upshot/police-killings-of-blacks-what-the-data-says.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0&referer=http://t.co/HDoLJ3hT3p
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:40 AM
-1

He'd already given consent. Is she obliged to stop if he falls asleep? It suddenly turns in to rape?
/r/MensRights20/01/16 07:22 PM
5

I see your point, use their shitty logic against them.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 07:24 AM
-20

First, you've misspelled Schumer's name repeatedly. Second, are you actually buying in to the whole drunk sex isn't consensual bullshit?
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:34 AM
1

He did not "overpay" $3,000, her simply paid off the $3,000 he legitimately owed. Nice bs headline.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 10:22 PM
2

Wtf is with the top hats and accents? Weird fucking video. Accurate, but weird.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:07 AM
1

Please point to an error from snopes
/r/MensRights19/01/16 05:35 AM
1

"Want to close wage gap? Step one: Change your major from feminist dance therapy to electrical engineering." CHSommers
/r/MensRights22/12/15 06:11 AM
0

Yeah my guess is he shoved the door, very hard, hurting her in the process. I would've been extremely pissed off too.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 01:20 AM
1

I'm skeptical of this guy's account. Reeks of bullshit. He probably learned her new man was in the house, with his kid, and fucking blew up. It's interesting how people in this sub just completely buy his whole story without question.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 11:58 PM
1

Yeah sure
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:18 AM
0

Who the fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:35 AM
0

Yeah bad argument, that didn't happen.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 09:41 PM
-1

Winning and "understanding the material" are not mutually exclusive. Genius.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 06:02 AM
0

Read a book. How ignorant can you be? I don't have the time or desire to educate your ass. You seem to buy into the whole social construct/cultural explanations common in feminist/sjw circles, where genes don't exist or exert any influence.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 05:00 AM
0

Not ad hominem.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 12:04 AM
-1

It's obviously an inherent trait as men are more aggressive and violent in every culture ever studied. Not one exception has been found. When a characteristic is universal it can be assumed to be innate.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 11:04 PM
-1

Yes. Next question.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 02:53 AM
-1

"Is violence a male value?" Actually, to a large degree, yes. The data is clear, males are far more violent than women, for sound, logical, evolutionary reasons. Do you doubt this? I don't think men's rights should be based on a belief that men and women are identical, or that all differences are just cultural. In fact, you seem to be in agreement with the feminist theory that male violence is a purely social construct.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 02:33 AM
-3

She's a condescending piece of shit.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 02:22 AM
-21

Oh, you're "so proud of her"? As if she were your kid, or dog. I bet she really appreciates your approval, you condescending shit. Typical MRA.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 11:43 PM
0

Nope. I agree that AVfM is pure shit. soulless_ging is absolutely right, associating or embracing that site will not help the MRM.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:55 PM
2

It's not private. "St George's Academy is a state-run comprehensive secondary school and Sixth Form serving pupils aged between 11 and 18." From Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_George%27s_Academy
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:48 PM
2

What!?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:45 PM
2

I see the parallel, and I don't disagree. Re equality of outcome vs equality of opportunity, that's a value judgement that individuals hold varying positions on. I'm in the equality of opportunity camp, but that's just me.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:09 AM
2

I see it, obviously, in the Marxist Feminism link, but the other one, not really. Consider radical anti racists. They're making the exact same points as radical feminists, replacing "man" with "whites". But neither are calling for the removal of capitalism. The BLM movement has not attacked Adam Smith, and nor do most feminists.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:30 AM
2

I disagree that feminism derived, at all, from Marxism. I see your point, the obsession with so called equality, but as you say, communism is an economic system. Feminism is not an economic system period.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:36 AM
2

I don't see the connection. I think fascism is just as good a comparison, or totalitarian.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:23 AM
1

Judging by the up/down votes you've received, you were wrong to even make this post.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:08 AM
1

Lol you're just stupid bro, made a bunch of dumb ass statements (like the one I just quoted) then try to insult me based on nothing. Nice try
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:55 PM
1

"an accuser without evidence should be seen as the suspect" I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess you're not a lawyer. Or in law school. Or even have the slightest grasp of how our legal system works.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:09 PM
3

I didn't advocate using the term victim. I agree, it's loaded. Accuser/accused is just fine.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:56 AM
3

Calm down. And for God's sake, stop referring to everybody you disagree with as a troll. All I'm saying is, imo, you're over thinking this. Accuser and accused are just fine, now move on. I'm just arguing for simplicity.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:44 AM
3

Accuser and accused are neutral, factual, accurate. You're getting way too worked up about semantics, like a feminist.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:31 AM
5

Accuser and accused would be just fine.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 01:54 AM
2

So you're ranting about nothing.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:58 AM
4

Yeah absolutely leave the bitch, no question. If you stick with her you're partly responsible for the mess she'll make of your life.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 04:30 AM
16

Prosecutor will likely not take this to trial, based on what you've said. Don't plea to a lesser charge.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 09:17 PM
3

Generalizing and facts are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 08:01 PM
11

You're being over-sensitive. I see your point, and it is slightly annoying, but getting offended easily is for the sjw's and feminists. Too many people in our society are just looking for something to be offended by, claiming "micro aggressions" etc, and this is similar.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:54 PM
-1

Yep, 1 in 5 frat members is a serial rapist. It's true, I read it in a pamphlet. What happens in India/Pakistan/et al is different because that's just their culture and it's not our place to judge.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 11:34 PM
5

I agree that if those intentions were proven, nail her.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:08 PM
-9

So any acquittal in a rape charge equals the accuser to be charged? Not good. If it can be proven that she lied or fabricated evidence, then fucking lock her away. This is India, where they actually do have a "rape culture" as opposed to the US.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:24 PM
-1

No it is not. "Nine states (Alabama, Colorado, Kansas, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Iowa, Montana, Utah, and Texas) and the District of Columbia." allow it. -from Wikipedia (link in my previous comment which you obviously ignited.)
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:38 PM
4

It's basically a southern thang. Both parties have to agree to the marriage, you cannot be tricked in to a marriage simply by being roommates for a long time. Here's more: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage_in_the_United_States
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:10 AM
2

Sausage fest is a term used exclusively by men. This is a shit post just looking to whine about something. There's a lot of real issues, let's not invent outrages.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 09:36 PM
6

Why? It's brilliant. Points out a glaring inequality that no one can deny.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:44 PM
2

She's gonna serve 2 years just on weekends?
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:37 PM
6

If there were no difference, trans gender would be meaningless.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 08:54 PM
0

It's one step removed from the anti vaccine crowd. Yes, hysteria. Calling it "mutilation" is an obvious overstatement and reveals you as a zealot.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:51 PM
0

I totally agree with you. The main area I can't get onboard with regarding men's rights is the anti circumcision hysteria. Everything said on here about it is hyperbole. Even comparing it to female circumcision is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 09:40 PM
5

That bs at the end ruins it.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:58 PM
-8

To be fair, he's laughing throughout too.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:03 PM
1

Why have that conversation? Virtually nothing good can come out of it.
/r/PussyPass30/07/15 07:53 PM
12

Of course it's for others' attention, there's simply no other reason. You remind me of people who say "yeah I got a boob job, but just for me, not others attention." That literally makes no sense.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 03:13 AM
1

And it's ancient.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 12:18 AM
-2

This is not defamation, not even close. No law was broken. OP got screwed, lightly, but no recourse at all. Wasn't a real job, accusations weren't done publicly, everything is hearsay...
/r/MensRights18/07/15 02:30 AM
2

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 If indeed you meant gender, i.e. the way a person "feels" in their mind, it is legal in many states to discriminate on that basis; that's not what's being discussed however.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:14 PM
-4

First of all, you mean sex not gender. Second, no it's not legal.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:01 PM
2

"they're our cultural problems" Your sense of irony is incredible.
/r/PussyPass15/07/15 03:37 AM
1

The men and women don't typically play at the same events, mainly just the Grand Slams.
/r/PussyPass01/07/15 05:23 AM
2

Google definition of partisan
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:34 AM
9

Literal?
/r/PussyPass04/06/15 06:25 PM
1

How is she considered a feminist?
/r/PussyPass28/05/15 09:22 PM
3

You just generalized the entire left. And sexuality is the only thing leftists see as innate, everything else is environmentally caused.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 02:33 AM
-2

In "my world", yes, all consensual acts are legal. But here in the real world, you think crack mom's enjoyed privileged status because they weren't prosecuted? For what? Possession? Showing signs of past use?
/r/PussyPass24/05/15 01:15 AM
-1

Are you actually implying they should be prosecuted for a crime? What crime would that be?
/r/PussyPass24/05/15 12:22 AM
-4

Was on r/mensrights several times.
/r/PussyPass09/05/15 05:52 PM
-100

Rerererererererepost This has been all over reddit for days!
/r/PussyPass08/05/15 09:23 PM
7

She actually DOESN'T ADMIT TO ANY DECEPTION WHATSOEVER. Why does OP's headline, and the always objective National Review, claim she did? Nowhere in het statement does she admit to any lying at all, in fact she restated her anecdote, saying she still recalls that anecdote "exactly how I said it". How is this an admission of deceit?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:54 PM
32

It's real.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 04:36 AM
25

Not sure what your point is. For what it's worth female tennis players draw smaller crowds, and further women only play best of 3 sets, while men (in grand slam tourneys) play best of 5; how fair is that? Females also have special rules regarding injuries, coaching, and heat.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 04:36 AM
16

Female tennis players aren't paid less, though they should be, for the reasons you stated.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 03:10 AM
113

Not really: http://i.imgur.com/AqLrf04.jpg
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 03:09 AM
0

Wrong Irrelevant Blacks might be more rapey, statistics seem to indicate this, but you're the one claiming it, not me
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:18 PM
1

My point is that at least some outlets, AVP in this case, are putting it out there with no trace of sarcasm or satire; they (AVP) are serious.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:07 AM
1

It's actually not satire, it's from the anti violence project: http://www.antiviolenceproject.org/prevention/11-guaranteed-sexual-assault-prevention-tips/
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:20 PM
7

More dumb bells and more Nobel's
/r/MensRights30/03/15 10:56 PM
-7

Well, it's also the fact that most of the perpetrators are male, so it actually goes along with the notion that men are rapists. The prevalence of male on male rape in prison just shows how perverted and rapey men are.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 10:45 PM
13

Wrong sub
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/15 03:36 AM
2

"They have literally jumped the shark..." Really?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:20 AM
6

Is that you Gary Ridgeway?
/r/MensRights16/02/15 01:34 PM
3

No he wouldn't
/r/PussyPass13/02/15 09:20 AM
5

Not only that, but given how consent can be revoked at any point, even during sex, you need video of the entire act.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:46 AM
-1

That's not even what the shirt says.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:15 AM
-5

Now men have their own "1 in 5" stat to endlessly repeat. Great.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 01:59 PM
0

Sure, why not?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:57 PM
2

Exactly. Usage of words like "harpies" makes it dismissable as right wing, chauvinistic bs.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:40 PM
2

Your headline implies that society finds this acceptable, which is not true at all.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 02:30 PM
-1

Still not seeing any sources there big guy.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:42 PM
-8

The phenomenon of women assaulting men is uniquely a western one; women in Africa, the Middle East, even South America, would never assault their man, they don't have the law to back them up.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 07:12 PM
16

American male privilege. Women in the middle east don't pull that shit.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 06:12 PM
-1

I hope you don't consider those citations
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:50 AM
-4

The prison rape problem is virtually all male perpetrators, just like in outside society.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:58 AM
5

A total stranger who has been following you for a half mile, late at night, turn for turn? No police department in the world would charge her.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/14 04:15 AM
7

This sub and mensrights often go out of their way to be offended, exactly as feminists and sjw's do all the time.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 10:29 AM
-23

Because her actions weren't all that unreasonable.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 10:14 AM
10

I feel like the English language was just raped.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 02:01 PM
0

None.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:08 AM
0

Regardless of genre? What exactly do you think should be done? It's blatantly obvious from the reactions this video has sparked, that men do not see anything wrong with this, and this men aren't going to change. At all. Obviously you can't criminalize anything done in the video. So what's the point? If the point was to clue men in on the horrible harm they're causing with the "catcalling", that mission failed, badly.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 01:02 PM
0

What about her behavior? Someone says hi or good morning and she ignores them? Struts right on by? What a complete asshole move by her.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:15 AM
2

We are in agreement. 90% was not meant to be empirically proven.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 09:35 AM
-1

I understand your point, mine is simply that 90+% of women never view porn. Of that small percentage that do, your data has meaning.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 08:04 AM
-6

No, porn viewing is over 90% men, so this whole post is virtually meaningless.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 03:11 AM
1

I don't know. But if you're working 70+ hours a week you're not being a great parent. Men are far more willing to put career ahead of family and women, to their credit, aren't. Hence the wage gap.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 04:22 AM
2

Men are better at ignoring their families in favor of career. Being a CEO means being a shitty parent, no way around that.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:05 PM
1

Ok, you had me until that last line.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 01:44 AM
-1

Then write a better headline dumb fuck. "Women with premarital sexual partners...are not relationship material" is pretty unambiguous. And absurd.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 05:57 AM
-8

Bullshit. I, for one, don't ever want to fuck a virgin.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 12:20 AM
5

California just proudly enacted a new consent law, the so called "yes means yes law", which requires a verbal yes.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 03:51 PM
4

If you're not really trying.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 06:36 AM
0

The couple from hell
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:00 AM
3

You described the very problem in your headline. Start acting like that other guy. It's been empirically proven that his style works, yours doesn't. Pretty simple really.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 07:21 AM
1

Actually hit me with the exclamation point/period combo; I'm tapping out.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 08:04 PM
0

Always love when people use all caps, really drives the point home better.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 03:00 PM
-5

Having once been a fourteen year old male with lots of friends, I gotta say she's got a point. There is a reason for double standards: men and women are radically different, Gloria Steinem's claims notwithstanding.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 09:02 AM
-2

Then cite that
/r/MensRights04/09/14 01:43 PM
-2

Me cite some evidence? Ha! That's rich. Look through the comments and show me any citations at all for the bullshit that women(!) are responsible for 90%, a claim which is repeated throughout.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 01:01 PM
-8

You guys don't seem to realize that you're actually parroting feminism, with its insistence that men and women are the same. They're not. Crack a book on evolution, science, nature, something, because this sub is ridiculous at times.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:29 AM
1

Could be. It varies wildly by state and country. He never at any point claimed to be a victim of rape, still doesn't. But hey, you know better than him I guess. Still shouldn't have to pay a dime though.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 07:25 AM
-9

Why? It's true
/r/MensRights04/09/14 03:41 AM
1

"While in high school, Olivas had sex with a 20-year-old woman. As he sees it now, she took advantage of a lonely kid..." As he sees it now...Now that it's going to cost him, he thinks he might've been raped? Never went to the cops before. How in the world is this rape? And don't give me that "well, if the genders were reversed" bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 02:16 AM
1

Oh bullshit. Whites never oppressed blacks either huh? Dumb shit.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 01:52 AM
1

Take a look at the middle east and the treatment of women. That's our history.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 01:41 AM
-1

You're right, boys/girls = identical. Gloria Steinem was right after all I guess.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 01:46 PM
-6

No, we're letting him as a grown up decide. He still doesn't consider it rape.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 12:20 PM
1

Not quite accurate though. Traditionally, not saying currently, but through the ages, men have oppressed women. I hope that's not in question. Also, whites (Aryans) have oppressed non whites. So an analogy to "Aryanism" would be masculinism.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 09:42 AM
-5

He never saw it as rape, still doesn't. That's why.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 09:18 AM
-11

Ok, that absolutely not what happened. Read the article.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 09:15 AM
1

Revenge exactly, sweet.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:16 AM
4

Nope. Once you've been attacked, retaliation is justified. Sure, you could extricate yourself and not retaliate, but as victim, that's entirely your option. If you want to strike back, feel free, you're entitled to it; if you don't want to, like if it's a huge guy, that's fine too. Being attacked has now given you the choice. I'd do what Tim did.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:37 PM
7

Seems legit
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:09 PM
-6

The fish/bicycle one is hilarious, and frankly, the only good one. The others are too long winded and seem like they were written by a MRA for his girlfriend to hold while he snaps a pic. (And I'm going to hell for this: most of the girls look about the same as the feminists.)
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:48 AM
-7

What on earth are you trying to communicate? Feminism = bad?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:09 PM
4

Wrong sub?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 11:35 AM
2

Shitty analogy.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 10:24 AM
1

Work on your English
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:25 AM
-7

Satire?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:57 AM
2

Belongs on r/hipsterrights
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:38 PM
1

It's a weak post bro
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:23 PM
0

How many women are convicted without forensic evidence? More than men. Oh, you want a citation?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:43 PM
2

Lots of people are convicted all the time without forensic evidence, what's your point? How is this a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:31 PM
0

Calm down, it's a humorous article and not anti male.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 08:17 AM
0

I linked to this post in r/feminism in a post about female imagery in the media. Was banned. Shocking.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:05 AM
0

Mr. Melodrama
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:34 AM
1

Actually we live in an anti rape culture. We are constantly bombarded with stats like the 1 in 4 nonsense, or tv shows like To Catch a Predator, or seeing people like Castro and their evil deeds. In our prisons it's not uncommon for sexual predators to be assaulted, by other bad guys! Everywhere you turn in our culture, from universities to the Vatican, anti rape is the theme of the day. This is all to the good (mostly) and I'm not complaining, but when some people can look at our society and co…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:27 PM
0

Wrong sub
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:24 AM
1

Physically, you can "kinda" understand? I was referring strictly to physical strength, don't confuse the issue by referring to mental strength.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 02:47 PM
4

Physically. No controversy there, though should've been stated more explicitly.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:40 AM
2

But who is doing the raping? The article doesn't even touch on it. I suspect, but have no data, that males are the primary perpetrators.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 02:46 PM
1

But compare the women's rights movement and the civil rights movement, both admirable in their intentions. Whites have traditionally oppressed non whites; men have traditionally oppressed women. So, to some, who haven't read about it, or properly understand it, the mrm seems tantamount to a white's rights movement, in that what we're talking about could be called reverse sexism, just like reverse racism.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:09 AM
2

But consider, openly gay women have participated in professional sports for decades, with very little backlash. This is not the case for men, there is a double standard. Thus it belongs here.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 10:35 AM
1

Could this be any fakier?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:52 AM
0

Calm down.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:51 PM
3

Fortgang really is a douche though.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:20 PM
6

You just proved his point.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:35 AM
-2

I clearly said that there are obviously exceptions. Sure it's a generalization, but we're discussing entire genders so exceptions are unavoidable. I stand by my main point though: the vast majority of sexual crimes, both inside prison and society at large, are perpetrated by men. The victims cross gender, but the perps are usually men. Simply dismissing anyone you disagree with as a troll is just an evasion.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:33 PM
-3

No, not at all. I just don't agree with most on this sub on this particular issue. I think the men's rights movement has so many valid points, so many great arguments, yet on this one I think it's way off. It's like trying to argue men aren't taller than women; it's obviously untrue. Just my two cents, but I'm not a "troll".
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:04 PM
-6

Why does it matter who's doing it? Because that's what we happen to be discussing at the moment. Men and women are not the same, not even close, and pretending otherwise is folly.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:29 PM
-8

My point is obvious: men rape, women don't. (Of course there are plenty of exceptions, but the trend is real, not feminist propaganda.)
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:57 PM
-4

In prison the raping is done by men. What's your point?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:37 PM
-10

It's absolutely not acceptable, but that's not the point. Who's doing the raping in these prisons? Other males. So men may be equally represented as the victims of rape (if we include prison) but the perpetrators are almost exclusively male, that's the point. Or do you think female guards are sodomizing inmates?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:26 PM
-11

Remember the Castro case, 3 girls kept in a basement for a decade? Or the Green River Killer? Or Bundy? Serial rapists are a male phenomena. Girls get snatched off the streets. This does not happen to males.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:11 PM
-26

Sexual predators. Don't give me that "men get raped as much as women" crap. No they don't, not outside of prison anyway.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:15 PM
1

No shit, pretty obvious, same with "women and minorities". Plus your wording is only confusing things.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:23 AM
1

*Implying, not inferring.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 04:52 AM
-7

Right wing egalitarian? That's a new one.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 03:16 AM
-2

Bullshit headline. He was "found guilty" of absolutely nothing, not even charged.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:36 PM
1

I grew up in a "crip" neighborhood and so never wore red. To this day, 30 years later, I still never wear red, and I live nowhere near there anymore, it's just ingrained in my mind.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:05 AM
12

5' 10" is not short. In any country.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 04:44 AM
-18

"Nine year old Grayson Bruce says he was not surprised that other boys picked on him..." So he went off to school intentionally starting a controversy.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 02:13 PM
7

The boy actually says that he knew he was gonna get picked on.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:52 PM
9

Can someone transcribe? Can't read a thing.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 06:34 PM
16

How is this even comparable? Did we carry out a botched invasion of the Ukraine? What the hell are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 02:11 PM
12

You can't actually believe this.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 11:03 AM
-4

First world whining.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 12:19 PM
1

As long as he is on paid leave, he hasn't been damaged, in the legal sense. Forget libel or slander, those aren't even close to applying to this. Nothing legal to pursue here; people are falsely accused of things all the time, 99% of the time legal recourse is not available.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:19 AM
-5

That totally happened.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:20 AM
2

A few more links on the issue: The “pay gap” is probably the most widely-cited example of supposed disadvantages faced by women today. It is also totally misleading, as it is only a snapshot of average yearly full-time incomes that does not account for overtime (about 90% male), type of work, or other non-discriminatory, voluntary factors. The Department of Labor recently funded a study that proved this and found the pay gap is caused by choices, not discrimination. http://www.consad.com/content…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 03:21 AM
0

"The sickening CCTV footage showed Craig being kicked by David Rooke, who was wearing steel toe-capped boots, while his wife stood and watched from the doorway of their home in her pink dressing gown." And there's your reason for disparate sentencing, she wasn't the one doing the actual abuse, just aiding and abetting, or an accessory to, the abuse.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 02:21 PM
1

Boy, can't understand why people think mra's are just woman haters.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:46 AM
9

Or take a look at the senate/judges/CEO's...
/r/MensRights06/01/14 05:03 PM
2

If you think white males have it bad in America, that is simply a testament to how much nearly everyone yearns to be a victim. Absolute delusion.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 04:51 PM
2

Wrong again. I was pointing out that fighting for men's rights is tantamount to fighting for white rights; don't be surprised when people get offended and there's a backlash. Why is this so hard for you to comprehend? And where you get that nonsense about women's studies is beyond me. I never wrote, nor implied, that this sub or the mrm is at all engaged in racial issues, I was pointing out that fighting for the rights of men (historically the oppressors) is the equivalent of fighting for the ri…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:42 PM
2

Hey Einstein, I'm equating white/men rights, i.e. dominant group playing victim, not accusing this sub of racism. Try to keep up dipshit.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 02:16 PM
0

Crying "troll" is simply an ad hominem insult.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 12:50 PM
16

The Department of Labor recently funded a study that proved this and found the pay gap is caused by choices, not discrimination. http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf Women work (44/56)x100=78% as much time as men. Kind of explains the gap by itself doesn't it? The Gender Pay Gap is a Complete Myth http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505125_162-28246928/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/ Gender pay gap is not what activists claim http://wwww.examiner.com/x-22…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 12:05 PM
1

I'm not sure if you're being deliberately obtuse or not so I'll explain the analogy. White people have traditionally oppressed and exploited non-white people; the civil rights movement made some significant gains, and presently there are some white people who feel it's gone too far and that they (white people) are the ones now being victimized. Men, like white people, have historically oppressed and exploited women; now they're playing the victim. Also, look up definition of libel.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 08:16 AM
1

In fairness, you can't blame facebook for how our society behaves/thinks; don't shoot the messenger.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 05:58 PM
1

Not libellous [sic].
/r/MensRights03/01/14 05:48 PM
1

That's why I asked how knowledge of OP's literary tastes became known. OP says he's being ostracized for his tastes, I'm wondering how people know. Does he tell them? Do people see him reading on breaks at work? Does he hang around childrens libraries? Etc. To me, that's relevant. Even though you, and perhaps many, don't see anything strange about a grown man hanging out in the childrens section of a library, no one should find it surprising that a lot of people will find it weird. Our society i…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:03 PM
0

From Webster: "a person characterized by irrepressible optimism and a tendency to find good in everything"
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:25 PM
0

What's the term for a male pollyanna?
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:15 PM
0

I think you're actually performing some mental gymnastics presently. I have a daughter and we often used to go to the library. If I saw a middle aged man sitting in the childrens area, reading Dr Suess, with no kid he is attending to, I would find that odd. Certainly not call-the-police odd, but let's-keep-an-eye-on-this-guy odd. I mean let's cut the bullshit here, it is absolutely not normal adult male behavior to go sit amongst small children reading childrens books. Pedophiles are known to vo…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:35 PM
1

Where exactly is this happening? At the library? In a park? How is it that so many are aware of your rare reading tastes? Do you broadcast it?
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:03 PM
0

So, a 50 year old man sitting in the childrens section of the library shouldn't arouse the slightest bit of attention?
/r/MensRights30/12/13 08:48 PM
-2

I agree with everything you said, there are real issues, but many complaints on here are bogus, especially the whole women-are-just-as-violent-and-pervy-as-men bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 05:50 PM
-8

How witty
/r/MensRights30/12/13 05:23 PM
-2

This entire sub is nothing more than a strained attempt at attaining victim status, a common activity in America. When you're a victim you can blame others for your problems. Women do it, minorities do it, and now even men, Christians, and white people do it. Pathetic really.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:55 PM
-8

Also, if you're going to go on and on about white rights, expect some backlash.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:45 PM
-21

How do you know you were raped? Do you actually recall her riding you or something? All while you're erect? I call bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 12:51 PM
-1

I'm going to assume English is not your first language, given that there are dozens and dozens of typos in your comment. If you think that men and women are fundamentally the same psychologically then we will never see eye to eye my friend; I believe men and women are vastly different mentally and that treating them exactly the same is misguided. Ironically, you go way back in history, to a time when we didn't pretend men and women are identical, and praise the olden days. So why do you, and mos…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 06:57 PM
-1

A single standard makes sense only if men and women were identical psychologically. They're not.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 05:35 PM
-4

All bs
/r/MensRights27/12/13 02:29 PM
-7

Homicide perpetrators = mostly men. Rape perpetrators = mostly men.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 09:08 AM
-9

Jeez, you're a complete bitch aren't you?
/r/MensRights26/12/13 09:41 AM
0

If you have to even question whether men are more naturally violent than women, you must be either really young or just a complete fucktard. Open your eyes.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 06:07 AM
1

Radical I know.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:35 AM
1

Men in every culture on the planet are the more aggressive, more violent gender. No real mystery. "In 2011, the United States Department of Justice compiled homicide statistics in the United States between 1980 and 2008. [1] That study showed the following: Males committed the vast majority of homicides in the United States at that time, representing 90% of the total number of offenders."
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:21 PM
1

Because they more frequently commit crimes, especially violent crimes.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:10 PM
-1

All the chart shows is that men perform more crimes than women.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 02:08 PM
-5

Yes.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 08:23 AM
1

I can see circumstances that definitely warrant arming oneself, even a firearm. OP seemed to be suggesting men begin regularly carrying pepper spray to fight off all those predatory female rapists and pedophiles, which is, obviously, insane.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:25 PM
-5

A very rare scenario, certainly not common enough to warrant carrying pepper spray out of fear...of women. Women, on the other hand, have very good reason to fear men, and arm themselves accordingly. Don't give me stats about male rape victims, most of those are in prison, at the hands of a fellow man.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:37 PM
-5

The absurdity of your headline shows why women aren't the sexual predators that men are, despite the constant claims made on this sub.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:53 PM
4

That means absolutely nothing outside of a court of law.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:50 PM
6

Ok, the student charged with rape insists on a lawyer, the university simply expels the student. End of story. Substitute employer for university, and employee for student,and this expands to include all workplaces. Further, the word "universal" is used, implying that North Korean prisoners enjoy a right to an attorney. In America, anyone arrested or charged with a crime has a right to an attorney, that's about it.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:57 PM
11

"A right to an attorney is universal." No, it certainly is not, not in any meaningful or legal sense.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 02:28 PM
16

A right to an attorney at a college hearing does not exist. Same goes for an investigation in the workplace. The fact that it could lead to criminal charges is irrelevant. However, the record of the hearing is inadmissible in court.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:44 AM
2

So you really want 4, but want to go through an extra step? You're saying that 3 is the best way to get to 4?
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:44 AM
-4

Bullshit. Point me to a mainstream feminist that says these things. What the hell is a "mainstream feminist" anyway? I agree completely that the term mysoginist is completely over used, and is often applied to all men, but that doesn't negate my original point. Archie Bunker was a mysoginist yet he doesn't meet the criteria set forth by OP.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:50 PM
-5

You pulled a reverse straw-man: define something so as nobody meets the definition.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:07 PM
-30

So he was a snitch? My sympathy just evaporated.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 02:34 PM
-26

Speaking of that, shouldn't Daniel's mom have, at some point, asked "why are you spending so much time in the shed with that old guy?"
/r/MensRights07/12/13 02:09 PM
0

They're more obsessed with money than looks. If that's more shallow than we're in agreement.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 09:40 PM
1

Convenient that women don't really care about looks.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 09:28 AM
-42

I see there's a womens football session as well as just a football session. Are you gonna get all pissy about that too?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 02:05 PM
1

Interesting choice of phrasing. I'm sure it could be viewed as "stop excluding a group that was excluded before", i.e. women. This is nothing more than affirmative action. Are you in the states? If so, the EEOC could be your best ally.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:04 PM
-3

Well, how does one respond to such an absurd claim?
/r/MensRights18/11/13 07:27 AM
-8

Ah, the old "troll" evasion. Well, carry on your important work of fighting for men's rights, in India. Hilarious.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:23 PM
-9

A men's rights group in India is like a white's rights group in South Africa during apartheid, or in the southern US during Jim Crow.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:10 PM
-8

Bullshit. India is the rape capital of the world. A mrm in India is almost offensive.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 03:17 PM
2

Hahaha, stop with the melodrama.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:26 PM
1

No. This sub is constantly talking about the practice of routinely, in the united fucking states of America, circumcision performed on new borns. That comparison is absurd. As I stated above, I too agree that what your pic shows is the same as fgm, and I find it appalling. We're in agreement on that. But do you consider what your pic shows to be at all comparable to circumcision performed on infants, as is common in America?
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:15 AM
2

Does that pic accurately depict the average male circumcision? If it did I would completely agree with you. But it doesn't and you know it.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 08:28 AM
-1

In comparison, yeah it is. And as a circumcised male, thank God my parents had me mutilated.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 06:46 AM
2

http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeswomanfiles/2012/06/20/top-100-websites-for-women-2012/4/
/r/MensRights30/10/13 01:55 PM
0

If it were common to take boys against their will, at the age of 13, and hold them down and forcibly cut off part of their cock, then you could equate the two. That's not the case anywhere on the planet so drop it. No one with an iq in the triple digits is going to listen to such an obvious false equivalency.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 01:10 PM
-1

Because it's apples and oranges. Your typical male circumcision does not leave one traumatized for life with mental scars that will haunt one until their dying day. Indeed, the vast majority are completely unaware it ever even happened. How you guys continue to equate these entirely different things is beyond me. It's like you guys really want to be just as much a victim, always trying to construct clever arguments and cherry pick statistics to convince people that men have it really bad. And in…
/r/MensRights30/10/13 12:52 PM
1

Ok stalker.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 07:35 PM
5

Wtf is a rookie character? What country is this in?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 01:38 PM
-1

It seems like a lot of posts on this sub are like this, trying to find an instance of anti male discrimination where one doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 01:21 PM
1

Check screen names, I'm not your troll. Nevertheless, you are declaring someone a troll, that lamest of internet insults, meaning nothing more than you disagree. Besides, you and the "troll" are on the same side of the argument, why are you picking a fight?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 12:03 AM
1

In the US that is perfectly legal. The only things that can't be considered when hiring are gender, race, religion, age, disability, and in some states sexual orientation. That's it, anything else is fair game. The employer could have a policy of not hiring blondes, perfectly legal. Get your facts straight.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:33 PM
1

Bad link
/r/MensRights26/10/13 11:57 AM
-8

What's with this "troll" bullshit? Anyone you disagree with is a troll?
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:09 AM
2

You know, you don't have to label yourself. You seem obsessed with pigeon holing yourself.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 01:48 PM
0

Interesting. That has changed. I know as of 1995 several states had 14, and one even had 13! At the bottom of this link are the ages by state back in 95: http://www.ageofconsent.com/comments/numberone.htm
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:38 AM
-1

Off the top of my head, Hawaii, Mississippi, Idaho, South Carolina, Massachusetts (I think). And lots of other countries.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:13 AM
-1

My problem with statutory rape is the actual term "rape". It should simply be called sex with a minor. The word rape means against one's will. It's a poor choice of words. It may also be worth noting that in a few states he is beyond the age of consent.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 10:51 AM
-2

No, I'm not saying that. But the "victim" never alleges non consensual sex. Yes, I see statutory rape (which is a bogus term), but as far as I can see, all the sex was consensual. No?
/r/MensRights22/10/13 10:39 AM
-6

Where exactly is the rape? Yes, imprisonment, but rape? She forced him to become erect and then fuck her? Nothing in this story suggests the sex was anything but consensual. Find a better case.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 10:10 AM
-5

Where is the 4% number of men raising another mans child figure come from? Seems way low. I've read it's estimated at 1 in 4 men.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 07:19 AM
1

Nice headline
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:33 AM
2

No
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:11 AM
4

Seems fake, authored by anti circumcision advocate.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:15 PM
2

Oh fuck off.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 11:46 AM
1

I think that's the problem. I have TMobile and not a damn thing is blocked,.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 08:53 AM
1

Wow. Your first point I don't disagree with at all, but it's irrelevant to what is being discussed. If anything, it helps my argument. Gender is a biological reality far more hard wired than race. Second, you're comparing birth defects to bring transgendered? Are you actually saying these people are literally defective? Yes, you are. Third, I don't care if homosexuality is a choice or not. Couldn't care less. People have the right to do anything they want so long as it's consensual. For me, it's…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:25 AM
1

OP never claimed what you're objecting to, don't be such a prick.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:16 PM
-8

One's brain doesn't get to determine what gender one is. Same for race, height, etc. If I say that I always thought of myself as a black man, despite my obvious lack of pigment, is anyone obliged to take this seriously? Individuals do not get to define reality.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:30 AM
0

Where's the sexism?
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:16 AM
-3

Girls won't laugh at you.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:20 AM
2

Absolutely. Discrimination only applies to 5, sometimes 6, groups: race, religion, gender, age, disability, and sometimes sexual orientation. Everything else is fair game.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter