TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

whoopswizard Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by whoopswizard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Forgetting about dating is the last thing they should do. Taking a step back wouldn't hurt, but none of that self improvement is going to happen when there is no goal being moved towards
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:57 PM
1

I hadn't actually, but I will now lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 10:26 PM
1

Keeping score as to the outcome of a reddit argument is pretty sad
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 10:24 PM
0

It's a better source than the two of us making guesses as to what the actual facts are
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 10:22 PM
0

not nitpicking 3 paragraphs analyzing the wording of my comment Okay were done here lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 10:08 PM
1

As for you not making that original comment, that's my bad. I didn't realize I had been talking to a second person
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 09:45 PM
1

Using an extreme hypothetical to demonstrate a concept is not even slightly similar to making two directly contradictory claims about a real life experience, it doesn't make any sense to equivocate those two things. I am aware that different people have different preferences, that is literally the topic this entire discussion has been about. I don't know how you can be saying in your other comment that you aren't isolating my argument when you are now still harping on that same point about the h…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 09:44 PM
1

If their personality was a reason they were having success, than they are very obviously not fitting within the criteria we are describing. You disliking someone doesn't mean every dislikes that person. How can you make the claim that they are abrasive to women and the claim that their personality got them women in the same breath?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 09:26 PM
2

The believability of the premise is completely irrelevant. Obviously the most attractive person on the planet is not actually a virgin. The point is that physical attractiveness is only one of multiple factors that women weigh, and in most cases, it's one of the least important ones. That is what you aren't engaging with. You seem to agree that this is the case, but instead of applying that conclusion to your original idea that any 30 year old female virgin is somehow more desirable than the mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 09:23 PM
1

I also didn't specify it being the most attractive man, only most attractive person. If you want to narrow it down to specifically the most attractive man, then the hypothetical largely falls apart. Assuming we mean the most attractive man in the eyes of heterosexual women, then having a shitty personality would disqualify them from holding that title, because as we established previously, women have a more holistic view of a partner's desirability and an ugly personality would be largely equiva…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 09:14 PM
2

Okay? Care to engage with any of the actual content of the argument instead latching on to a single example provided as an afterthought?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 09:09 PM
0

Making claims about scientific evidence that it affects brain chemistry is not speaking for yourself only. Wikipedia appears to indicate that the evidence of that is inconclusive and disputed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 08:57 PM
0

Outside of the things you list that are specific to sex, all of these benefits you've listed are general benefits that anyone would gain from quitting an addiction regardless of what they were addicted to. The removal of a persistent craving frees up mental capacity for improved concentration and general happiness/confidence due to the confidence boost of breaking a difficult addiction. And the ones that are specific to sex would hold equally true in terms of recovery from a normal sex addiction…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 08:40 PM
7

No, they wouldn't. They are both unwilling virgins, which means that they are not desirable. Being maybe potentially closer to not being a virgin doesn't count for anything. Either they are desirable enough to have success when they enter the dating market, or they are not. It is as simple as that. If a woman got to that point, then there is a reason for it, and that holds equally true for a man. You are failing to separate physical attractiveness from desirability. They are not the same thing. …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 08:16 PM
30

And the 30 year old virgin man is desirable by comparison? I assume your line of logic here relates to the general trend that women don't value physical attractiveness as highly as men do, but that doesn't change the fact that in either case, regardless of the factors that determine their desirability to the opposite sex, an unwilling 30 year old virgin wouldn't be in that position if there wasn't a reason that they're looked over when compared to other options
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 08:02 PM
9

I don't see any evidence of them making that claim, only you assuming their position on the topic. The actual content of what they said was that it is a sad position to be in for a man to be chosen as a backup option to a more attractive, less financially stable man. They didn't condemn the hypothetical woman in the situation for changing their mind, they only sympathized with the plight of the hypothetical man. So if assumption is an issue, then again that was you lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 08:14 PM
14

They said their piece quite clearly in the first comment. You are the one whose position seems unclear in this exchange
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 08:06 PM
2

???
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:23 PM
3

Not sure how me paraphrasing the conversation I just read is me telling you what your overall opinion on women should be, but okay lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:19 PM
3

I don't see how IM the one generalizing here
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:10 PM
2

I don't even know what that means lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:08 PM
6

"Women don't find this annoying" "I'm a woman and I find this annoying" "Women don't find this annoying"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:05 PM
1

To steer it back onto course so to speak would imply that it was steered off course by someone previously, and I, at least, don't see any evidence of that being the case. To me it makes sense that with women having gained a new level of autonomy and financial potential compared to a lot of history, there would be an outsized reaction towards more and more of them being independent, until the point that it becomes apparent that the opposite extreme is not better. It seems likely that the second t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:45 PM
1

"Not feeling great" seems like a pretty far distance from "irreversible" to me
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:35 PM
1

Not taking a position here, but what do you mean by "you can't turn back hypergamy?" Someone could choose to settle for good at any point couldn't they?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:32 PM
1

I didn't provide a counterexample, I simply asked you to extend your logic to an area you had clearly not considered. Again, nobody but you ever said anything about the necessity for survival/ reproduction of said urges.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 08:15 PM
1

I'm not trying to argue any certain viewpoint lol I just pointed out a hole in your point and you now seem to be jumping through lots of hoops to pretend it wasn't there
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 08:02 PM
1

You just did it again lol. I didn't say biology was off topic, I said the necessity of survival was. And even then, assuming a premise without bothering to acknowledge the boundaries of it is just bad rhetorical praxis
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 07:56 PM
3

You're ascribing context to your original comment that was never provided. This is the first time necessity for survival has come up in the thread
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 07:19 PM
6

What about drug addicts lol? Just keep boofing fentanyl?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 07:07 PM
5

Those were cliche examples I think, but most people do have some sort of luxury they'd happily spend much more money on if they could afford it in my experience. For me, I agree I could care less about anything beyond a decent level of quality and functionality for things like cars and clothes and whatnot, but I'd spend thousands on VST plug-ins in if I could
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 03:30 PM
10

This would be a very foolish distinction to draw right now considering the pandemic which has prevented a huge amount of in person meetings over the past two years, and in my opinion a bizarre one even in normal circumstances
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 09:55 PM
2

After a relationship sure, it's reasonable to expect closure. But in the context of someone that's just been chatting or on a dating app then you can't expect a stranger to be responsible for your self esteem or future dating success. Even if that weren't an unfair expectation, it's just not in your best interest to make yourself that vulnerable to essentially random people. It takes multiple interactions and an extended period of time to have a real sense of someone's personality once they've r…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 11:36 PM
1

You people are so tribal here it's insane
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 12:40 PM
4

If I need to sign a contract to get someone to believe I mean it when I commit to a relationship, then there is not enough trust between us for me to want to commit my whole lifetime to that person anyways. I don't have any interest in having children, so outside of a tax write off or some practical reason, there is just no benefit to me signing a contract that at best gives me nothing and at worst completely fucks me over financially
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 11:14 PM
1

I was just pointing out the hole in your argument I also think marriage is a really dumb deal that involves the government for no reason
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 11:06 PM
1

That's the most common and effective way to espouse an idea, presenting arguments collected mostly from other people who share that idea. you're doing much the same thing from the opposite viewpoint. A group of people having a consensus on a topic is not the same as them conspiring to further an agenda
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 10:59 PM
1

Stop me if I'm mischaracterizing your argument here, but are you implying that these women are employing some type of collective strategy to oppress men? If so, that's fucking hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 10:49 PM
0

That doesn't sound like a strategy it just sounds like people having kneejerk reactions to something, which is kind of the exact opposite of a strategy
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 10:45 PM
0

Who are "they" and what agenda are they furthering with this "strategy"? I just see a reddit argument between individuals
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 10:40 PM
1

They don't abide misused evidence, I guess they prefer to just invent their own
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 10:33 PM
1

Bro what. I literally stated a fact and offered no opinions outside of calling the previous commenter an incel. What did I flip and where?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 08:19 PM
0

You are literally debating a point right now by saying you aren't debating, and again, for the third time, the weird part was you responding to something I did not say, essentially putting words in my mouth. What part of that is difficult to understand? I have been very clear in my wording.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 04:36 PM
0

It was weird because I was never talking about it and you jumped onto my comment to debate a point that I never made
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 04:30 PM
-2

Can you not read? I never said you didn't address it, I said I didn't address it, and that it was weird for you to bring it up
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 04:27 PM
-1

I'm not reversing cause and effect, I never referred to any cause of anything, only stated the fact that women are less used to rejection, you're putting words in my mouth. The decision to bring up cause and effect and go off on this incel tangent was yours alone friend
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 04:14 PM
10

Okay? That doesn't change the fact that, on average, women have experienced fewer rejections and are therefore less used to dealing with it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 04:04 PM
2

It is a fictional movie about the president being a pro wrestler and watering the crops with Gatorade. Didn't you say you were done twice now only to come jump onto my reply to a different person? If you want to argue just argue dude lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 05:20 AM
2

You said you were done earlier then came back lol so I guess not
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 05:18 AM
1

Who cares if you didn't make the original comment when you defended it for the following 5 lol? You were clearly in agreement
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 03:49 AM
-1

Did you really just cite the opening to an early 2000s b list comedy film starring the less popular Wilson brother as evidence for the life decisions that real people should make?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 03:46 AM
2

I was describing the idea as psychotic, not you, which is by definition not what ad hominem means. And yes, the notion that someone should have a child for the sake of improving their work ethic is ABSOLUTELY psychotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 03:41 AM
0

That is what's necessary when someone is giving a psychotic opinion and overlooking something that is obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 03:39 AM
4

Dude this is not a discussion about chasing your dreams and Carpe diem shit, it is about the very real fact that many people are in no way prepared for the responsibility of raising a child to adulthood without causing the child harm along the way. Who gives a shit about whether or not someone is "missing their chance?" Once someone is an adult with free will they can use it do drive their car off a cliff for all I care, the issue at hand is the fact that a child can not fend for themselves when…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 03:37 AM
2

You're right. They shouldn't be jobless and living at home. And they sure as fuck shouldn't also have a kid while jobless and living at home. If you are more concerned with the effect that a baby would have on their work ethic, and not the actual well being of said baby, then it is a very good thing you don't have any actual say in the decisions made by people in these circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 03:13 AM
1

Sure, there is no perfect time, but to pretend that there aren't periods of many peoples lives during which they are too poor or distracted to be up to the challenge of creating a new person would be absurd. Obviously a twenty year old teenager without a job living with their parents should wait until a better time to have children. It is absolutely valid to wait for better life circumstances before putting your self in charge of a tiny helpless person
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 02:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter