TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wickedogg Archive

View 4 posts and 351 comments by wickedogg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Why do you have to be a couple in order to have sex, is it just social pressures or do you think there is something about human nature that prevents people from having sex just for the enjoyment of the sex itself?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 05:40 PM
1

Do people really think this guy was having a lot of sex when he was younger?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/19 06:58 PM
1

The only thing a woman is ever seeking out of sex is social status. Any guy who believes that a "gorgeous, perfect, virginal, young woman" will have sex with him knowing there will never be a relationship, believes that she will do it because having sex with him gives her higher social status. Have you ever heard of the idea that after marriage women stop having sex with their husbands? The idea is that since the woman has nothing left to gain, she is no longer interested in sex. This has nothin…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 10:28 PM
1

I browse /r/conservative and I try to recognize when groups that I'm part of get into circlejerks so that I can disrupt the thoughtless following. Men are discriminated against in the US in some ways, but we aren't victims of everything that happens.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:32 PM
1

Wish more people understood this about gendered bathrooms
/r/MensRights19/07/19 10:04 PM
1

If a man had the intention of going to a parking garage to abuse a woman, another man could stop him.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 07:02 PM
1

I never compliment women for their appearance because they did nothing to deserve praise. It's equivalent to complimenting someone for the weather.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/19 07:35 PM
1

Feminist criticism of him reads much more like jealousy to me. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3453884/JAN-MOIR-Lothario-DiCaprio-end-miserable-alone.html Arguing that being married is better than being single to someone who could marry anyone they want somehow doesn't seem very valid. It's like arguing the benefits of drinking saltwater to someone stranded in the middle of the ocean.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/19 08:39 PM
1

Those guys will be judged differently by men and by women
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 09:10 PM
1

Are you arguing that the same basic strategies can accomplish both the short term goal of tricking women into harming themselves by having too much sex and the long term goal of getting a man to harm himself by expending energy to support a woman who won't give him sex? Are you just thinking that manipulating anyone is a process of making that person believe that they owe you something?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/19 08:05 PM
1

Assume for argument's sake that you're idea is correct. All of the actions you think are redpill have the goal of sex. The purpose of the actions is so that the man can have sex with a woman. The sex itself could be just as enjoyable for the man and for the woman. There's no reason why the outcome is better for the man or bad for the woman. The goal for the things you mentioned is to have sex. What's the goal of the woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/19 07:27 PM
1

Shhhhh, the way this campaign works relies on women being stupid and thinking that the company is favoring them and on men being stupid and thinking that they are gaining something they aren't entitled to get. Don't tell anyone!
/r/MensRights09/04/19 08:20 PM
1

What happens when men use the code: SISTERHOOD?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 08:15 PM
3

Statute of limitations could be 5 years, maybe he should go to the DA.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:15 PM
1

Here's what I don't get. The rich guy can buy all kinds of things that the poor guy can't buy. The fat ugly woman in the dark is the same warm wet hole as the hot fit woman. Why can't guys just fuck ugly fat women while thinking about hot fit women? I'll save you the suspense. Ugly fat women are just as difficult to fuck as hot fit women, so there is no incentive for a guy to settle.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 08:05 PM
1

I was being unclear because I don't explain this very often. Discriminating based on gender is illegal. Being a woman is a gender. Since only women can give birth, then any discrimination having to do with birthing a child would be considered gender discrimination against the female gender. Suppose you have a bathroom where you have a tampon dispenser, and only women are allowed to use that bathroom. Are you discriminating against men by not offering them tampons?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 06:12 PM
1

Paid vacation to be with your new baby? Just because they're doctors doesn't mean they're stupid. What it means is that if male doctors have the same opportunity for time off as female doctors, then there is no reason to prefer male doctors.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 05:06 PM
1

Women are the protected class. Since only women can give birth, giving birth cannot be a reason for discrimination.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 05:03 PM
1

They aren't a protected class
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:52 AM
1

You are a hospital hiring doctors. You know 40% of the female doctors will leave within a year to have a baby, how would you not consider that? I'll tell you how, give all male doctors the same amount of paternity leave as females get for maternity leave.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 01:10 AM
1

This isn't a case where there is any proof that her accusations were false.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 08:15 PM
1

Private stalls exactly like bathroom stalls. Don't see anyone campaigning against private bathroom stalls to have toilets in open rooms.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 07:13 PM
1

100+ What the fuck? I've never heard of that. But anyway, you don't need an hour in the stall, have 20 stalls, you get 2 minutes to change each. Plus any kids who want to be naked in front of everyone can still change outside the stalls. This isn't about stopping nudity, it's about allowing privacy.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 06:46 PM
2

It's an unstated premise, right? So instead of accepting that it is a valid premise, you can argue the specific facts or call out the person making that unstated premise. If you just claim that was the reason, then you let everyone else just deny that was the real reason.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 06:43 PM
0

The problem is boys get in trouble for under age girls sending them naked photos That's a different problem and the girl should get into trouble for sending it, not the boy for receiving it. But then how can the school force the boys to see a girl naked in person? How is seeing someone naked in person better than seeing them naked in a picture? Nobody should have to be naked in front of other people.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 06:41 PM
2

he's a man, so anything he does is wrong off the bat Don't engage with that premise, otherwise you validate it.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:56 PM
7

if they had some major bullying issues and were trying to prevent that Private stalls like in a bathroom. Being naked in front of other people makes you feel vulnerable and it's fucking weird when you are a kid. No one should be forced to get naked in front of other people.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:24 PM

First, how would seeing a naked girl make him a pedophile, but seeing naked boys wouldn't? Second, how are schools allowed to discriminate by having separate locker rooms for boys and girls? Third, how come the kids are all allowed to see each other naked if seeing each other naked is illegal? All children should be allowed to change in private without other children or adults watching them, this would solve all the problems with this situation.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:32 PM
24

Just explain how discriminating based on sex at all for sports teams is not discrimination.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:55 AM
1

Swetnick - I found zero news stories or anything else indicating that Swetnick has made that claim or that she retracted anything. Do you have a source? Deborah Ramirez - I found zero news stories or anything else indicating that she retracted anything. Do you have a source? Judy Munro-Leighton - She says that she lied about writing the anonymous letter. She never said that the letter was false, just that she wasn't the one who actually wrote it. She's a liar and we don't know the truth. So basi…
/r/MensRights07/11/18 11:58 PM
1

lol, seriously which women? The article is just about some woman that lied about being the one to send a letter and about the fact that Avenatti's client hasn't produced a copy of Kavanaugh's calendar.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 11:42 PM
1

Which women made false statements in the Kavanaugh hearing?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 11:05 PM
1

Which women made false statements in the Kavanaugh hearing?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 11:04 PM
1

"Your woman" like that you bought at the woman store?
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:28 PM
1

Right, but your are protecting male heirs from male rivals to the crown. You are intentionally discriminating against men to prevent them from getting your crown. You let women marry into the family but not men.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 04:57 PM
-6

It is racist. Whenever you say something about a group of people based on their perceived race, that's racist. You could say that there is a culture that people with black skin tend to gravitate towards because people in general tend to identify more with people who look like them, but it in no way applies to all black people. Black skin isn't the defining characteristic, it's identifying with black American culture and a person with white skin can belong to that culture just as easily.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:24 PM
0

There's a Black Twitter?
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:20 PM
1

Who has the statistics on false rape accusations?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 03:32 PM
1

Which we agree had nothing to do with fines.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:24 PM
1

So we agree that wasn't what she complained about.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 03:53 PM
1

you are going to take this away from me It's right in the quote that you posted. She had a game taken away from her as a penalty. She wasn't alleging that men or women get more fines or more penalties. She was only making one allegation; that men don't get games taken away from them for doing the same thing she did. Maybe she's wrong maybe she's right, but why all the bullshit about her actual claim?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 03:52 PM
1

Nope, because the complaint was specifically about being penalized a game, note about being fined. Why would she give a fuck about a few thousand in fines when she makes millions.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:06 AM
1

What's a fine?
/r/MensRights18/09/18 09:08 PM
-16

What's a fine?
/r/MensRights18/09/18 09:06 PM
1

Serena Williams: It was an unfair double standard to take a game from me as a penalty during the match. Morons: Her claim that she was fined more than men is totally bullshit! There is no way she was complaining about the fine during the match because she wasn't fucking fined during the match, she was complaining about the penalty of losing a game for fuck's sake why can't we argue about whether her actual claim was valid rather than making up a bullshit argument that she never made.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 08:28 PM
1

"feminist academia" Yeah bro! Isn't that amazing!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/18 07:51 PM
1

It's not a stereotype at all that there are clear detriments for women's health in having children. You're equating obvious health detriments with unhappiness. Is this a stereotype: http://sciencenordic.com/mothers-all-boys-have-shorter-life-expectancy-and-more-illness How about this: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/09/bearing-sons-can-alter-your-mind
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/18 07:33 PM
1

My comment was that she was upset by the game penalty not the fine, now it seems like you are agreeing with me.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 02:37 PM
1

What does that have to with the fine $ amount?
/r/MensRights12/09/18 02:06 PM
1

You've never watched McEnroe play have you
/r/MensRights12/09/18 01:56 PM
1

Game not point, which never happened to a man. Whether she deserved it is a collateral point. She complained that she received different treatment not that she didn't do it.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 01:29 PM
1

Yes, I didn't mean to deny that it happens, just that it isn't necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/18 11:01 PM
1

Not sure anyone cares about the $ fine. I'm sure Serena can pay. She complained about being penalized a game, which didn't happen to a man.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 10:59 PM
1

using harsh language to remind themselves and other readers about how terrible women can be is important There's a difference between passing judgment about behaviors compared to describing them. Talking about how women behave or why they behave that way is different from claiming that they are evil or bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/18 10:45 PM
1

It's true that there are people motivated by hatred of women who also subscribe to red pill, but there is no theory that badmouthing them is beneficial or necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/18 10:17 PM
0

rampant badmouthing of women in an attempt to appear edgy and extreme That isn't part of any red pill dating strategy I'm aware of.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/18 09:52 PM
-6

Damn, everyone must be really sad about Manafort and Cohen getting convicted. How come Trump didn't prosecute Hillary? Oh that's right, because he's a liar who doesn't give a fuck about anyone but himself.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 11:43 AM
1

There's two different things going on in her blog. One is her beliefs about women, men, and relationships, but the other is her advertising/job. Women can accept in the abstract that there are different people who desire different things, that's part of how they can believe that their experiences or desires are different from other people and that they are special in particular. All I meant was that if she thought it was going to be read by a broader audience she would have written "most women" …
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 04:31 PM
12

It all boils down to: men I want to fuck /= men I want to marry
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 08:57 PM
6

To be fair, she could know that there are different people and she just isn't writing her blog to those people. There's a difference between assuming everyone is like you and assuming everyone who follows you is like you. I don't know anything about whether this particular girl is stupid or not.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 08:53 PM
-14

https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment_new.cfm I'd say you're more likely to die from being alone in a room with a gun, than you are to be falsely accused of sexual harassment from being alone in a room with a woman.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 07:07 PM
1

Hey, if it's good enough for the extremely religious right wing vice president of the US, then it's good enough for everyone.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 03:16 PM
1

Hold on there friend. "Institutionally" can mean two different things that sentence. It can mean that they are shut out by an institution or as an institution, jeez. My argument was pretty clear from my original comment that blaming one gamer not playing with women is silly when there are thousands of athletes who don't play with women.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 03:04 PM
1

Some careers and assets are harder to lose. A doctor could move from brain surgery to a charity clinic, but hes not going to work at mcdonalds. Getting rid of millions in stocks is way different from just not paying a mortgage on a house.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:43 PM
-2

And?
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:39 PM
-10

If you say so
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:14 PM
5

Why is everyone here so convinced that things will change? It seems much more likely that the Japanese men have adapted to the environment and the women have no reason to make any changes because any reproductive urge they feel can be dealt with in other ways: pets, adoption, toys, etc.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/18 04:39 PM
-4

For me step one is: stop calling everything "the media". If we want to have a productive discussion about this, we need to call out specific companies and/or people. "The media" is such a stupid term for anything that it makes me physically angry when I hear people use it in a serious way. I understood what you meant and I'm not trying to jump down your throat, it's just such an infuriating thing.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:18 PM
-12

How is that better? Women are institutionally shut out of professional sports and no one says a word, but one guy says he wants to avoid the appearance of impropriety in a sport where women actually are allowed to play and everyone wants to shit on him? Where were all these morons when Pence was getting elected vice president? The President of the United States said that he grabbed women by the pussy. He has been sued for sexual harassment, he has been sued for raping a 13 year old, he has paid …
/r/MensRights15/08/18 03:20 PM

A partial list of other players who do not play with females: All NFL players All NHL players All MLB players All NBA players Why are they making a big deal out of one guy?
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:36 PM
1

Depends on your age and career and assets
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:28 PM
1

I don't know how to be clearer, the children are the issue. The court has to determine custody and support based on the best interests of the children. An alcoholic drug addict mother getting custody is not the best interests of the children. Supporting the mother living expenses is not a consideration.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:08 AM
6

The court determines custody based on what the court decides is best for the children and the judge will usually say something like "Don't you think children need their mother?" Child support is not based on percentage custody because there is no percentage. One parent is the custodial parent even in joint custody. The other parent pays child support based on the amount of money they earn. You never have a "fair" outcome, you have an outcome that is supposed to be best for the children. Fault is…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 10:16 PM
2

How to end gender discrimination in the STEM fields: Women's studies is now a STEM subject.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 09:37 PM
1

I had a client who went through a divorce like that, lost custody, lost his house, lost his relationship with his kids, even went to jail. In his second divorce case (I was representing him on a small contract case) he didn't give a fuck, he didn't even hire a lawyer, he stopped working and put in a claim for social security disability, he stopped paying all the bills so his property went into foreclosure, he fought every single issue in court and file a motion every week, he didn't pay for the …
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:16 PM
4

I thought that's what the "maybe" was for. There's no rule in the NFL about size or weight or strength, but if there was someone could argue that there are no women who can meet that rule, therefore they have no equality of opportunity. One of the ways to look at equality of opportunity is if the requirements for the job exclude a particular group of people. People who are disabled and therefore cannot walk, are completely excluded from being NFL players, but it's ok because the exclusion is the…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 09:09 PM
6

One of the republican counties in CA, interesting. White neighborhood or were Mexicans giving you shit? Just kidding, I think I can imagine down to the haircut, what type of person was fucking with you. I hope you told her that her husband would be hearing about what she did.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:13 PM
2

What?
/r/MensRights10/08/18 05:05 PM
7

I've seen lot's of feminist protests, but I've never seen any question a dad at the playground just because he's a man. Also, lots of people come to the playground just to sit on the benches or eat their lunch, it's not like there's a separate area for all the adults without kids to hang out.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 05:04 PM
13

Nah, I think it's more about where you live. In NYC everyone thinks they are progressive so they have to be cool with other people who are different, we don't even yell at the guy masturbating in the playground anymore (jk someone chased that guy out two weeks ago). The other thing is that if you talk shit to a stranger they might just punch you in the face. In the first few years I lived here I had some weird run ins with people pretty often, but in the past like 5 years it stopped happening.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 04:54 PM
13

That's fucking weird. I've volunteered at my son's school and never had any problem. If someone said something like that to me, it would not be over. What country do you live in?
/r/MensRights10/08/18 04:40 PM
5

If a job requires certain physical characteristics and men are more likely to have those characteristics than women, then there might not be equality of opportunity, for example: employment as an NFL player.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 04:38 PM
4

Because of actual physical differences? Professional sports?
/r/MensRights10/08/18 04:05 PM
1

In my son's school the only male teachers are: gym, shop, and foreign language. All the primary teachers are women. I'm not sure how this will ever change, but we need to change the entire elementary school education system anyway. The whole system is antiquated and has no basis in science. It drives me crazy that people are attached to a system that was created by religion just to benefit the religion and they never even think about it, even though it is probably the most important system in th…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 04:02 PM
16

Where do you live? I take my kids to the playground every Saturday and no one has ever said anything to me even if I'm playing hide and seek with my kids.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:59 PM
2

The upside is we get this cool song.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:56 PM
2

Why would Uma Thurman need alimony?
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:18 PM
10

then they recognize you as being higher than they are So we all agree that being cocky is unnecessary and being humble is fine.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/18 09:59 PM
16

I think you're missing the context. He's not going out to pick up girls by being humble, he's passing shit tests from his friends by being humble. If you think you need to brag and act cocky to your own friends, then you are really insecure. You are trying gain position in your social circle by climbing your friends.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/18 09:53 PM
1

It's not just about confidence, it's also about being respectful and nice to other people. If someone is trying to insult you, they are obviously feeling threatened so trying to hit back or defending yourself turns the situation into a fight with a winner and a loser. If you instead brush it off, then they feel less threatened and better about themselves. You gain their respect because you weren't mean to them and you didn't try to downplay the fact that they felt threatened by you. When you bru…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/18 09:47 PM
2

Clickbait gonna bait for clicks
/r/MensRights31/07/18 07:12 PM
2

Gender segregation for all classes taught by female teachers?
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:24 PM
13

Can't mothers teach their daughters to treat boys equally?
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:00 PM
1

but i am disgusted by anyone who can even enjoy sex with someone who isn't actually into them Disgusted like the same way as you might be disgusted by someone who likes to incorporate feces into sex, or disgusted like the way you are disgusted by someone who is into rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/18 10:17 PM
2

Your proposing a false dichotomy. Your initial claim is that men prefer bad girls over good girls, but as they get older they prefer personality over looks for getting married. Are you implying that: hot girls = bad girls and ugly girls = sensible girls
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/18 08:30 PM
1

What's the downside to fat girls? Just less energy in bed and less agility? Fat is soft and feels good. I'm not especially attracted to fat girls, I just don't think it's such a big deal as far as sex goes.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/18 09:21 PM
1

I intentionally used women's moisturizer and now I can't stop complaining.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 07:06 PM
1

This makes a lot more sense than just him being generally depressed.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 07:05 PM
22

Seems like the reporting from some sources was totally accurate: https://www.npr.org/sections/pictureshow/2018/06/17/620775153/a-photojournalist-at-the-border
/r/MensRights22/06/18 07:10 PM
357

Crickets from the media? Is the media like that 4chan hacker guy? Why lie and bullshit when there is a real story here? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/06/22/the-crying-honduran-girl-on-the-cover-of-time-was-not-separated-from-her-mother-father-says/?utm_term=.bef36ab79e3a
/r/MensRights22/06/18 07:02 PM
3

Expectation: pull out a gun and shoot every one of them. Reality: pulls out pepper spray, gets beaten and sent to the ER.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:42 PM
1

I don't remember ever being attracted to 13 year olds because I was never a hebephile. When I was 13 I was attracted to women who had already gone through puberty. I'm not attracted to women because they are my "peers". I'm attracted to women based on physical features like smooth skin, high cheekbones, symmetrical features, silky hair, firm breasts, well toned legs. When I was 13 I was most attracted to women about 18-19 and at 40 I'm most attracted to women about 18-19. I don't understand why …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 02:27 PM
1

As long as the person is not attracted to underage children, then it's nobody else's business who he's attracted to. If he was into men instead of women, that would be way more misogynistic, but you never hear women calling gay men misogynists. The bigger problem is that there is some expectation that men have to change their attraction to satisfy other people: You have to be attracted to fat women. You have to be attracted to older women. You have to be attracted to ugly women. Why would my att…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 10:13 PM
1

Has that ever been found?
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:33 PM
3

Why don't parents teach their daughters not to lie?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 12:47 PM
6

What the fuck is the actual name of the charity? Men should know not to call "Lifeline" in case they are feeling suicidal. They might be told to kill themselves. This is serious shit that could lead to men dying.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:48 PM
4

Patriarchy: Girls need to be protected and coddled because they are weak and incapable. Feminists: Girls need to be protected and coddled because the patriarchy treats girls unfairly!
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:52 PM
1

There are studies that make this claim: https://sapac.umich.edu/article/196 Here are some other statistics: https://www.rainn.org/statistics/perpetrators-sexual-violence
/r/MensRights25/04/18 02:30 PM
2

As much as I hate Ann Coulter, she sometimes has the courage of her convictions.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 01:24 PM
9

More evidence that cops should all have cams. Also, sounds like that woman should be in a mental hospital.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 02:47 PM
2

California still had racially segregation in jails until a couple of years ago https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/oct/23/california-prisons-end-racial-segregation-policy California women's prison: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_California_Women%27s_Facility http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/the-state-worker/article167785097.html http://www.cjcj.org/uploads/cjcj/documents/women_in_california_prisons-hidden_victims_of_the_war_on_drugs.pdf
/r/MensRights20/04/18 02:22 PM
2

Not even in San Fran: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-transgender-san-francisco-jails-20150910-story.html
/r/MensRights20/04/18 01:56 PM
8

You go to the pound and they put you to sleep. But I guess that's better than being locked up with a bunch of women
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:08 PM
5

If you tell them youre a woman they have to put you in the womens prison
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:32 PM
0

Yes. If you get raped, and you don't report it, you were still raped. You already admitted that your entire comment was wrong, so there's no point in discussing this any further.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:34 PM
0

Yes. If you get raped, and you don't report it, you were still raped. You already admitted that your entire comment was wrong, so there's no point in discussing this any further.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:13 PM
1

Yes. If you get raped, and you don't report it, you were still raped. You already admitted that your entire comment was wrong, so there's no point in discussing this any further.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:36 PM
1

That's certainly one of the problems with the judicial system.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:13 PM
0

Yes. If you get raped, and you don't report it, you were still raped. You already admitted that your entire comment was wrong, so there's no point in discussing this any further.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:01 PM
0

Yes. If you get raped, and you don't report it, you were still raped. You already admitted that your entire comment was wrong, so there's no point in discussing this any further.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:47 PM
-14

My bad, didn't realize you were stupid. The chart for determining whether or not someone is guilty of a crime under our legal system looks like this: Were they convicted of rape? - No - > Not Rape Sorry for your confusion.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 02:09 PM
2

Question number six can be tricky to deal with if there is no evidence.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 02:00 PM
6

The chart doesn't have any gender, they would both be committing a crime.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:55 PM
1

Can you prove it was rape? - No -> Not Rape Seems like a weak ass argument to me. Wouldn't you have to have the same question on the other side then?
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:55 PM
-7

Women are only valuable for their appearance and willingness to have sex (except for the other female characters on the show).
/r/MensRights13/04/18 11:08 PM
1

Yeah, I need to make a better graph out of the information.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:07 PM
1

I'd show them this Why is ok for women to earn more than men for the same job?
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:55 PM
1

Why would you draw the opposite conclusion from what I said? Read my comment again?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:29 PM

There's no need to be misleading here, because this is clearly discrimination. What if the barber had said that he only knows how to cut kinky hair, or only knows how to cut straight hair? What if the woman had come in asking for a shave, and the barber had said that he only shaves facial hair? Sometimes discrimination has a reason, but that doesn't mean that it isn't discrimination. Urinals discriminate against women because they don't have penis. All professional sports teams discriminate agai…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:06 PM
-7

FoxNews was unclear about how people should react to the story. They failed to explain whether this story proves that women are shitty for complaining just like the guy, or whether the guy is a hero for showing that women are shitty for complaining like he did. Don't worry, they'll straighten it out and get the comments lined up soon.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 03:25 PM
1

No one should be allowed to control what other people wear, except under certain situations where the clothing is somehow problematic. Chefs have to wear hair nets. Factory workers can't wear loose clothes that might get caught in machinery. If there is a legitimate reason why naked photographs are not allowed in a classroom, then allowing naked people in the classroom would also be objectionable There are lots of people who believe that nudity is the end of the world, but personally I think tha…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:12 PM
1

mirror?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/18 06:24 PM
3

A rally to support a liar who filed a false police report? What the fuck? What did this juror say? Rape is subjective?
/r/MensRights30/03/18 06:06 PM
1

I'm one of the lawyers. Her application in family court was pro se. I assure you, when the judge understands that he already decided this issue and denied her order of protection, he is going to be really pissed off at the mother. This judge hears hundreds of cases every day and he just didn't realize that this was a case he had heard before because he's an idiot.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 04:24 PM
3

I think you're right, more people need to check this out before spouting off.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:30 PM
3

A decision I got from a judge yesterday in Family Court where there is a divorce case pending in County Court, granted an order of protection to the mother based on the exact same claims, word for word, from an earlier application that was denied, but this time the application was ex-parte. The judge is a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:22 PM
8

The line between teasing and insulting is somewhat subjective and sometimes people fuck up on one side or the other. Being able to read the reactions of the people around you is really important in figuring out whether a statement is an insult or just teasing and it's something that people struggle with in high school while maturing. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-wide-wide-world-psychology/201311/when-does-teasing-go-too-far https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-wide-wide-wor…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/18 04:28 PM
1

You're the expert https://www.sprc.org/comprehensive-approach/reduce-means https://actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org/sites/actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org/files/Reducing%20a%20Suicidal%20Persons%20Access%20to%20Lethal.pdf http://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap/evidence/suicide/q7/en/ https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/means-matter/means-matter/saves-lives/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47632945_Decrease_in_Suicide_Rates_After_a_Change_of_Policy_Reducing_Access_to_Firearms_in_Ado…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 02:03 AM
1

You're the expert
/r/MensRights21/03/18 01:37 AM
1

So? https://www.sprc.org/comprehensive-approach/reduce-means https://actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org/sites/actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org/files/Reducing%20a%20Suicidal%20Persons%20Access%20to%20Lethal.pdf http://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap/evidence/suicide/q7/en/ https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/means-matter/means-matter/saves-lives/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47632945_Decrease_in_Suicide_Rates_After_a_Change_of_Policy_Reducing_Access_to_Firearms_in_Adolescents_A_Nat…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 01:20 AM
1

I'm not surprised, because you're a moron.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:52 AM
0

Does being stupid hurt? https://www.sprc.org/comprehensive-approach/reduce-means https://actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org/sites/actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org/files/Reducing%20a%20Suicidal%20Persons%20Access%20to%20Lethal.pdf http://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap/evidence/suicide/q7/en/ https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/means-matter/means-matter/saves-lives/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47632945_Decrease_in_Suicide_Rates_After_a_Change_of_Policy_Reducing_Access_to_Firearms_…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:51 AM
1

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt, that you are just confused about this, but it's also possible that you are some foreign shill who doesn't understand English or you're just an asshole. The fact isn't the statistic itself but just something a statistic uses to interpret data, analyze data, create trends etc.... It's NOT stating that a statistic is a fact. Yeah it is. "Statistics" is a synonym for "data" or "numerical facts". The two definitions The difference between the two defini…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 10:39 PM
1

Yeah, it is the best reason. Passing doesn't change facts. If there were even a one day delay between applying for a gun and getting the gun, it would reduce the number of men who kill themselves with guns. That's the best argument. Just because you think owning a gun is more important than stopping suicides, doesn't make a different argument better. Do you understand the difference between "best argument" and "winning argument"? The best argument in favor of a waiting period, doesn't have to pr…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 09:34 PM
1

No, I'm not aware of that because it isn't true. The word "statistics" has two definitions. a fact or piece of data from a study of a large quantity of numerical data. A branch of mathematics pertaining to the collection, analysis, interpretation, and analysis of data. Clearly I wasn't using the second definition because I was talking about the stats that you presented, not any analysis, so there should be no question that I was using the word "statistics" as a synonym for "data" meaning the num…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 09:30 PM
0

Just find a woman who has more money than you or who earns more than you, so you can go into it with the assumption that even if you lose in the divorce, you don't get financially fucked.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/18 08:24 PM
-26

There's something wrong with you.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:50 PM
1

These stats are really misleading. Everyone is going to die. Causes of death for people should always be grouped by age. Heart disease doesn't become #1 until you are over 65. Suicide is in the top 5 for 10-55 years. Unintentional injury is #1 for 1-44 years. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_death_age_group_2015_1050w740h.gif
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:05 PM
-7

This is the best reason to regulate gun sales, including a waiting period for any gun, but because it's men killing themselves, you rarely hear it used.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:01 PM
2

Suppression of discussion is the real problem and it is fucking disgusting that the people who grew up during the '60s are allowing the silencing of the opposition. Trying to protect people from opposing ideas and upsetting statements is amazingly stupid. The idea of provoking a discussion by making outrageous claims isn't wrong, but if you start to believe your outrageous claims, then you failed.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:19 PM
1

Children are only different from adults because of the power structure? Or the difference between children and adults created the power structure? I'm so confused by this analogy. Reminds me of the time I worked on a case where we won over $300k against a law firm that fired a white attorney in order to hire a black attorney.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:51 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 05:40 PM
2

I just meant that you have to define superior otherwise there is no way to have the debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 05:06 PM
2

This is a really stupid discussion unless you want to define "superior." Females are superior to males just based on the fact that without males, the species could survive through in vitro cloning. Are men superior because the majority of world records for physical ability are held by men? Are men superior because they are more aggressive and better fighters? It's kind of like talking about how dogs are superior to cats.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 04:22 PM
3

We need more words to be womanized by womanizers so that womanizing can become more acceptable.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:07 PM
5

Can "mansplaining" be mansplained by a mansplainer, or does it have to be womanized by a womanizer to prevent it from being sexist?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:06 PM
-10

This book could have been written by a guy? It's written by an asshole, but it has nothing to do with anyone's rights.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:43 PM
0

I'm in support of any policy the goal of which is blow jobs, but why the fuck do only the worst high school losers get blow jobs? Legalize prostitution, let prostitutes accept medicaid, now I fully support your idea. I agree that people focus on preventing school shootings from happening rather than helping the people who become school shooters before they become school shooters and that it is a huge mental error.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/18 09:24 PM
1

This guy gets it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/18 04:03 PM
1

I don't have to believe in it because I know the definition of consent I'm glad you can "know" something that is the subject of the dispute, great argument. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/funding/guidance-for-applicants/research-ethics/frequently-raised-questions/what-is-freely-given-informed-consent/ ensuring that there is no explicit or implicit coercion, so prospective participants can make an informed and free decision on their possible involvement. sexual coercion Male victims of sexual coercion vic…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 10:02 PM
1

You can continue to believe that women can consent to sex, if you want to be an anti-feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 09:50 PM
4

Maybe Hardstyle just thinks that domestic violence is a joke.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:43 PM
1

No, it follows that rape shouldn't be criminalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 06:20 PM
1

Give it a try Yes, she did convince me. As a result my opinion of rape is that the value of the word is wildly overblown by most people and society. The people who use rape to describe being offended or not getting what they want are right, it's a bullshit word that shouldn't mean so much to us. Sexual assault and violence are crimes that we should prevent and discourage, but convincing a girl to have sex when she doesn't want to is only harmful because of the way society shames women who have s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 02:51 PM
1

That wasn't a quote, she wrote it better than I did, check out the book yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 12:57 AM
1

Ever since I read Intercourse by Andrea Dworkin I've believed that feminists think all sex is rape. If consent is only completely freely granted when there is zero disparity in social power or influence and we admit that there is a widespread cultural belief that sex counts as a victory for men and a loss for women, that men have more power, that men are more dominant, that men are more determined, then it's hard to argue that any woman is ever able to freely give consent. If you accept a defini…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 09:43 PM
13

Not every guy at Harvard is a pussy, this policy won't last.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:08 PM
253

Gender discrimination has to end, so we have to discriminate by gender!
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:07 PM
1

/#metoo
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:41 PM
1

Considering he outed himself as a sexual harasser, he probably isn't the best spokesperson to promote the fact that false accusations are more common than people think.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:41 PM
3

The cops had the texts but continued to hold him in jail?
/r/MensRights01/02/18 10:56 PM
1

Look at richer more successful societies where the birth rate starts declining. Men in those societies don't have to fight for anything anymore, so they stop trying, look at Japan.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/18 03:27 AM
5

I've intervened a few times in fights on the street, but if I knew alcohol was involved like at a bar I would just call the cops and walk away. You can never tell what someone is going to do when they're drunk. Last year I saw a guy harassing a woman on the street, they obviously knew each other, and he was trying to physically drag her inside. I told him that if he didn't knock it off someone was going to call the cops and he would end up in jail. He kind of realized that he was causing a big s…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:50 PM
3

If you beat up the guys hassling her, then she has to sleep with you because of the implication
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:32 PM
1

Maybe her argument was that participants don't count as victims so she was just being pedantic, or maybe she meant they are the ones who have to live with the consequences. Maybe she was just exaggerating because she was speaking at a conference about violence against women. We need a Senate investigation on this.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 06:27 PM
1

"Hillaries" Good one
/r/MensRights13/12/17 06:26 PM
1

She was the victim of her son's suicide not him. What a nasty piece of garbage.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 06:17 PM
24

They could also both just be pretending. If you look at Al Franken's hands, he isn't even touching her, he is just posing for the camera. Tweeden also looks like she is posing for the audience, but I can't tell if she is actually touching the guy. Perpetuating the idea that groping is acceptable is a way different problem from actually groping someone.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:26 PM
5

You obviously didn't read the article you fucking asshole. 'I just want my daughter, but I can't even see her, but yet I'm still paying child support. And the biological father has been found and he gets to spend time with her. I don't get nothing.' Lonnquist insisted Atkins abandoned any relationship with her daughter when he learned she wasn't biologically his. Atkins denied that and said Lonnquist refused to facilitate visits. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3714674/Colorad…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:49 PM
1

if the child has no attachment to you, you will never win custody Wrong. The law is actually the opposite of this. If the mother prevented you from having a relationship with the child, then that is a reason that the court would give you custody. https://www.divorceny.com/custody/jeannemarie-o-v-richard-p/ I lost a custody case based on that exact claim. I mean yea it's a bitch to get payment but any time in her life she comes into money it goes to pay back the damages. You think that magically …
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:09 PM
11

If any woman ever claims you are the father of a child, the best thing you can do is immediately sue for custody of the child.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:02 PM
1

You think you could ever collect money from a woman who would do this? Suing for fraud would be throwing money away. The best thing to do in these circumstances is sue for custody immediately. The child will get away from a shitty mother and you don't have to pay child support.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:00 PM
2

I'm hopeful that gay divorce will set a lot of precedent leading to the downfall of the current sexist system. Once judges start deciding cases involving two women or two men, they won't be able to hide the fact that women were getting special treatment.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:01 PM
11

Here's a popular opinion: I'm actually in favor of someone losing their job for being a sexist asshole.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 04:35 PM
21

The group of people who support racism and sexism and are against free speech need to stop pretending to be liberals
/r/MensRights22/11/17 05:52 PM
-2

I'm afraid it's more specific than that.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 03:29 AM
-3

"sexual assault" v "regular assault" What's the difference?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:47 PM
5

Maybe she meant incontinence?
/r/MensRights20/11/17 05:45 PM
3

Is that real? She should really have stopped to think about whether a man would have ever written a whiny article like that.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:35 PM
2

I'm not sure about that. It could be that the mens rea only pertains to whether he intentionally was trying to engage in sexual conversations, not whether he knew she was under age. That's why you can defend the case if the other person is actually an adult even if you thought they were a child.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:53 PM
1

Those are the cases where the lawyer's skill is in getting a good plea bargain. Maybe because the kid's dad was a defense attorney the DA thought it was a great chance to fuck him, but otherwise for just sending texts that's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 05:05 PM
13

Must have had a shit lawyer to come out that badly
/r/MensRights09/11/17 11:47 PM
5

I've always thought that the main problem for incels is that they believe there is something special about sex that makes it different from any other type of transaction and subject to some kind of magic rather than just the same considerations that go into any other sale or contract. Sure, when you are selling different products the psychology is different, but you are still just making a sale and you need to follow the same steps. No particular woman owes any man sex any more than they owe it …
/r/TheRedPill08/11/17 07:26 PM
-1

Don't be confused about the data and what it means my friend. All the news organizations gave way more coverage of republicans and Trump's words and very little time to democrats. If you want to use "Balanced" to mean always including a lie whenever reporting on a fact, then the word doesn't mean anything. "Balanced" should mean that coverage time of opposing parties is equal. News organizations shouldn't be commenting on whether a policy is a good idea or a bad idea, just whether or not the rea…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/17 06:46 PM
1

I keep forgetting how shitty CNN is because of how much worse Fox is.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/17 06:01 PM
3

Did it work?
/r/MensRights30/10/17 06:43 PM
1

Average?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/17 08:58 PM
1

I just can't remember the guy's name and it's driving me crazy Found it! Ugly George! It wasn't exactly like I remembered from 30 years ago, http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/10/nyregion/thecity/the-hunt-for-beauties-ugly-george-roams-again.html http://nypost.com/2005/06/17/ugly-george-cult-porno-king-of-1970s-is-baack/ I'll have to see if I can find an actual video from his show.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/17 07:31 PM
1

There was some guy, I can't remember his name, who made videos where he would just ask every single woman on the street to have sex and his ratio was about 1 out of every 100. He didn't use any game, he would just walk up to each woman and say something like: "Will you have sex with me."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/17 04:59 PM
1

People should be consistent in their attitude towards rape whether men are getting raped or women are getting raped.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 08:12 PM
2

Do I think actual sexual violence should be a joke or do I think that jokes about sexual violence be illegal/frowned upon? I think people should be able to joke about men and women equally. If jokes about men being raped are allowed, then jokes about women being raped should be allowed. I'm just trying to clarify your position on jokes.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:10 PM
1

I don't get this. Are you upset that it's allowed to be a joke and that jokes about men sexually harassing women should be allowed as well?
/r/MensRights24/10/17 05:10 PM
2

Next time ask them if they just presumed your gender, then ask them why they discriminate against people based on gender preference, then cry, then go immediately to HR, get a disability leave, file a lawsuit against the school, retire on your piles of cash. You could also say "I'm sorry this is the non-discriminating elevator, if you want to discriminate then you have to use a different one." Seriously though I would go file a complaint otherwise they will start excluding you from other things.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:35 PM
0

They could sue, but their case would get dismissed.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 09:06 PM
4

"California conveniently enough has a statute of limitations that prevents that from happening. Because if I were to go and mention anybody's name I would be the one that would be in legal problems and I'm the one that would be sued." Just because they can't be prosecuted for what they did to him, meaning he doesn't give a shit if they keep doing it to more boys. They would sue him. The problem with this argument is that at this point all he would have to do is tweet a list of names. We would al…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 04:28 PM
2

I agree. His explanation for why he won't do it makes no sense.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 03:36 PM
1

Didn't even know brains could be geared, is this an update from Clash of Clans?
/r/MensRights10/10/17 08:18 PM
1

His shock at the waitress was hilarious, it was like she couldn't figure out that there was no way that girl would leave her a tip.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 07:11 PM
1

All I know for sure is that people suffer from it, and these treatments relieve their suffering. If you've seen that medical studies, then link to them. I couldn't find any.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:54 PM
1

I'll put my kids up against yours in any challenge friend. Although I'd be highly surprised if anyone ever trusted you around a four year old. http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2014/08/06/336361277/scientists-say-childs-play-helps-build-a-better-brain https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2011/10/all-work-and-no-play-why-your-kids-are-more-anxious-depressed/246422/ https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/10/the-joyful-illiterate-kindergartners-of-finland/408325/
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:24 PM
1

Show me the medical studies and science confirming that this is a medical condition that should be treated with these types of drugs. Should boys who want to be more masculine be allowed to take steroids and testosterone? Should girls who want to look more feminine be allowed to get breast implants? This isn't just a case of allowing the children to choose want gender they want to be identified as, but of modifying their bodies. How can we know at this point whether it is better to just accept t…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:19 PM
1

Four year olds go to pre-school, church is for morons, kids play together at family gatherings, who the hell takes a four year old to a funeral?
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:23 PM
1

I meant that giving children drugs to try to change their gender based on the opinion of the child, not for other medical reasons. There could be some medical reason that those drugs are beneficial to the child, but just because the child thinks that they want to change genders is not enough of a reason.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 02:15 PM
2

Because a child's brain is not developed sufficiently for them to understand the decision. Children under the age of 14 aren't even able to properly calculate whether or not they can cross a street when a car is coming because they can't estimate the time it will take for the car to arrive and for them to cross the street. https://now.uiowa.edu/2017/04/why-children-struggle-cross-busy-streets-safely That's just one example of a decision that children cannot make. Allowing a child to change their…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 02:12 PM
1

Playtime ends? You mean, while she's sleeping?
/r/MensRights04/10/17 01:57 PM
2

good point
/r/MensRights03/10/17 10:18 PM

The problem with that is that it can be harmful to the children!
/r/MensRights03/10/17 06:01 PM

The problem is that those types of drugs should not be given to children.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 05:56 PM

I understand, but the problem is that children should not be given drugs or medical procedures because they aren't mentally equipped to make decisions that will cause such radical physical and mental changes.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 05:47 PM
5

We can't stop mass shootings by declaring that men are more likely to shoot people than women. Is she advocating that only men should have better access to mental health care and women shouldn't?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 03:56 PM
8

Sounds like it was beneficial for you even if this mom is doing it for the wrong reasons. My son liked ballet and dancing, but once other boys laughed or said anything, he immediately turned against it and refused to keep going.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 03:46 PM

My 4 year old confessed to me this morning that even though she is Elsa, she doesn't really have freezing power. I don't think there is anything from with kids playing and dressing up as long as they aren't given drugs or medical procedures.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 03:43 PM
3

Because women who are raped are different from all other types of crime victims?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 01:34 PM
2

defense will always try to discredit the accuser. That's true, but judges might be more willing to prevent reputation evidence from coming in to the case if they are more confident that false accusations are being prosecuted.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 01:33 PM
8

People are prosecuted for bringing other false claims, so I'm not sure how much it would deter actual victims,but if liars are deterred, then real victims would be more easily believed. The reason that promiscuity is used as part of the defense now is to claim that someone who has lots of sex was probably more willing to have sex and since the whole case is he said she said, it dirties up the reputation of the victim. If there was more likelihood of prosecution of false accusers, judges might be…
/r/MensRights03/10/17 01:46 AM
2

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights02/10/17 10:39 PM
1

Traditionally the defense at trial in a rape case is to attack the "victim" by showing that the victim was promiscuous, that the victim consented, didn't fight back etc., ie that it wasn't really a rape. If false rape accusations are prosecuted, then people who might make a false rape accusation should be more hesitant to make those accusations. More resources could then be devoted to valid cases and society would take the cases more seriously knowing that it is less likely that someone would br…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 09:18 PM
3

Maybe he was lying to avoid any responsibility?
/r/MensRights02/10/17 08:58 PM
1

It will be easier to prosecute actual rapists if false rape accusers are punished more severely.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 08:57 PM
9

Sexist men: Women should not dress provocatively because how women look has an effect on men! Sexist woman: Women should have their own area because how men look has an effect on women! Women don't get to control the way men look at them and men don't get to control the way women look to them.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 06:54 PM
3

:)
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:33 PM
8

"Innocent until proven guilty" refers to the criminal case. Employment decisions, college suspensions, and other actions by organizations that are not the criminal justice system are not bound by criminal procedure rules. Just like the 1st amendment protects you from government restrictions on free speech, Reddit can still ban or shadow ban you for saying things like "/u/brokedown is a moron who sucks dick for cash."
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:07 PM
1

Don't worry, this whole situation will get fixed when more lesbians start accusing each other of rape.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:25 PM
16

Lines denies raping his friend, claiming that he also fell asleep and awoke to find her on top of him. Hayhoe added that Lines ‘has no idea whether they were having sex or not’. ‘He says when he woke up he felt sick and went outside and fell asleep outside,’ he said. ‘In his case he cannot say whether they had sexual intercourse or not.’ Read more: http://metro.co.uk/2017/09/19/student-woke-up-in-uni-halls-to-find-close-friend-raping-her-6939618/#ixzz4tFKmthh1 If two people wake up having sex, w…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:48 PM
1

The whole reason that there is a criminal justice system with procedural rules is because false accusations destroy everyone and everything.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 05:02 PM
1

Not helping other people correct mistakes is easier, but letting them spread false information is more harmful.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 04:00 PM
1

Is there a law in your state that prevents men from using women's bathrooms? In NYC you can use any bathroom you want.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 06:44 PM
1

Thinking that women are socially inferior to men and need to have a protected time is really patronizing, I hope some feminists do something about this.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 06:34 PM
12

The woman sexually assaulted the man, this has nothing to do with being soft on sexual assaults, it only has to do with siding with women over men.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:08 PM
1

Great photo to show how slow hair grows.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:49 PM
1

Discrimination is wrong, but assuming that everything is discrimination just because there are not an equal number of men and women is fallacious reasoning.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:35 PM
-1

And take you people seriously when you already look like complete assholes and my comments are getting upvoted? Sure, that makes sense you upvoted yourself with an alt-account didn't you. What does "And take you people seriously" mean? You should learn to type, you might get more upvotes.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 10:49 PM
1

It's frustrating to me that ideas I like: equality between men and women, social programs to protect people, balancing a budget, promoting science, etc., somehow get co-opted by a group that I otherwise dislike. Universities are awesome and make the world great, why the fuck would they let SJWs create safe spaces where free thought is prevented? Planned Parenthood and sex education does a great job of limiting teen pregnancy, why the fuck do conservative Christians take it away and then complain…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 10:42 PM
-1

Maybe you were unclear, why don't you in your own words explain your claim about "minorities" and crime.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 09:32 PM
1

Guess, I'll have to edit the original comment.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:40 PM
1

Yeah, I was wrong.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:40 PM
-2

First, you claim that the difference in crime rate between "minorities" and "whites" is genetic. I respond with information about the differences in the access those communities had for opportunities to improve their lives. Then you claim that I am blaming something that happened for rape and murder. I ask you when we started arguing about the cause of crime rather than the difference in percentages of crimes committed by people with different skin colors you accuse me of strawmanning your argum…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:27 PM
0

I asked that because of your comment.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:22 PM
1

Yeah, I was wrong about that, it just wasn't that popular before Trump and his people.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:21 PM
-3

Sorry, I thought you wanted to pretend that "minority" didn't mean "nigger". When does blaming what happened two generations ago for rape and murder become acceptable in your mind? My bad, when did we start blaming things for causing crimes? I thought we were talking about the differences in percentages for people with different skin colors. What was your explanation for why white people commit rape and murder?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:17 PM
1

Why would you deny that she is alt-right? http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/02/14/kellyanne-conway-doesnt-know-who-retweeted-a-white-nationalist-from-her-twitter-account/
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:06 PM
-2

Wait, what are you denying now? You admit that Kellyann Conway is alt-right and that she made up the phrase "alternative facts" to describe lies told by other members of the alt-right administration, but you think "alt-right" was already part of the vernacular before that?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:55 PM
1

Yeah, Kellyanne Conway is totally not part of the alt-right, sure.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:50 PM
-4

Right, so the minority group called "Asians" in the study you are citing was responsible for 6% of crime in NYC but makes up 11% of the population. I guess the facts prove that minorities don't commit more crime. http://www1.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/enforcement_report_year_end_2014.pdf Where you go wrong with your inability to understand facts is that you have no basis to ascribe the cause to genetics, when there are obvious reasons. The middle class in America lar…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:45 PM
1

Are you joking? "Alternative facts" was literally coined by the alt-right. It's the whole reason they are called the "ALT-right". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_facts Look, I'm not a multi-culti, I don't give a fuck about "host cultures". If there are behaviors or traditions that are beneficial to humanity, then those should be spread to all people and detrimental ones should be ended by all people. Minorities disproportionately commit crime in America? That's a really dumb thing to c…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:11 PM
2

We've come full circle, the alt-right has their own facts and now the SJWs have their own facts.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 06:23 PM
1

Is this a reply to my comment?
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 02:56 PM
2

The big issue is that moderates don't pay enough attention to either SJWs or the alt-right because they are too busy not caring. Most people are dumb and they don't think about big important issues because they know that their opinion is uninformed and unhelpful. When some extreme group gets control of the narrative, most people just assume that the extreme group must be correct since that group knows so much more about the topic. This is how extreme groups rise to power. Moderates need to under…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 02:56 PM
4

That's only possible because it is so easy for businesses to convince people that things are worth more than they really are
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 02:49 PM
1

That isn't totally true. If you make sure to couch your statements in regard to union membership, then you are protected. If Dr. Damore had said "Google employees should form a labor union in order to properly negotiate a contract that takes into account differences between the genders, because..." and then wrote the rest of the memo, he would have been protected.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 02:48 PM
10

Dr. Damore: We should make decisions based on facts and evidence instead of condemning opinions based on our own preconceived ideas, especially in regard to refusing to listen to alternate views on gender bias. Google: You're fired.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 02:41 PM
1

He was too drunk to give consent to what? You seem to think that people should be walking around with breathalyzers testing anyone they have a conversation with.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:38 PM
-3

Two things wrong with your stupidity. 1) She doesn't do anything to the guy in her story. He tries to have sex with her and fails at it, then she leaves. 2) She didn't get him drunk or know how drunk he was when she first got into bed with him. If your idea of fun is sodomizing people with a horse, there is something wrong with you.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:17 PM
1

Isn't this the opposite of what we want? Don't we want to use her example to show that this kind of thing isn't rape no matter whether or not one of the participants is male?
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:04 PM
2

The problem with affirmative action is that it is discrimination. If you give extra benefits to certain groups, then that is the same as taking away those benefits to the other groups. In order to create equality you have to find out where a minority group is being treated differently and then stop that from happening, not give them a different special benefit to make up for it.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 03:45 PM
12

This is one reason why marriage is a scam that no one should get involved in.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 04:45 PM
1

Are there any examples of what the actual boys say about having sex with their female teachers? I see a lot of speculation by people saying that the boys like it, but what do they actually say?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:22 PM
1

Number 2 isn't going to be a problem
/r/TheRedPill20/06/17 04:16 PM

Nothing pleases a woman more than using hyperbole.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 09:12 PM
5

Women aren't as good at violence as men? I thought women were supposed to be equal? I guess there are real differences between the genders and that treating men and women differently is rational and necessary.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:31 PM
3

Thank god we are addressing the problem of only men having penises. Once that problem is solved, all these other differences between men and women will disappear. Feminist: All these terrorists are always men! Everyone else: Just because they have penises, they have to be men? Did you just assume their gender?
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:43 PM
7

If the police ever lie about what happened at the scene like this, you have to call and ask for a higher ranking officer. It's probably too late now, but if you had explained what happened and that you have video footage on your phone that will be seen when it is fixed, they would have changed their story.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 04:58 PM
1

Neither I wanted to see how people felt about a man getting a lenient sentence since everyone disagreed with me for arguing that instead of women getting harsher sentences, men should get more lenient sentences.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:36 PM
1

I don't have a good answer for this one. On the one hand jail is a shitty idea that is bad for everyone and this guy needs treatment, but also it was a fucked up thing to do.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 01:54 AM
11

This is a great example of how equality shouldn't be about making the other team worse off. We should all be able to agree the online anonymity is something that we can all enjoy.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:41 PM
1

That seems like the only reasonable solution to the culture of false accusations we live in.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:39 PM
17

This is my new favorite response to feminists http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-39705424
/r/MensRights17/05/17 04:03 PM
1

Totally right, I should be arguing both sides because the retards in this sub aren't up to it.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 08:33 PM
1

You are too stupid to argue with. You keep writing over and over that you don't know what a "complaining witness" is. And you keep writing over and over that you don't know what a "complaint" is or what "permitting the charges to go forward" means. I'm done explaining things to you. Here you go you fucking piece of shit: You may have some sense that the complaining witness in a domestic violence case is required to sign “the complaint” in order to permit the charges to go forward against you. Wh…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 06:42 PM
1

You are just not capable of understanding. Here you go you fucking piece of shit: You may have some sense that the complaining witness in a domestic violence case is required to sign “the complaint” in order to permit the charges to go forward against you. While this may frequently be true, as in most things related to the law, it is a little more complicated than that. http://www.nycdomesticviolence.com/not-signing-complaint-in-domes/ Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 06:22 PM
1

Nope, you are completely wrong again Here you go you fucking piece of shit: You may have some sense that the complaining witness in a domestic violence case is required to sign “the complaint” in order to permit the charges to go forward against you. While this may frequently be true, as in most things related to the law, it is a little more complicated than that. http://www.nycdomesticviolence.com/not-signing-complaint-in-domes/ Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:57 PM
1

You will never understand the way the law works or why the Supreme Court takes cases, but your claims are fucking laughable. The cases we are discussing are exceptions and you can read more about it, but don't bother because you won't understand. https://books.google.com/books?id=aUw2YE6z_u4C&pg=PA95&lpg=PA95&dq=inadi+and+white++exceptions+confrontation&source=bl&ots=alDYa5buDr&sig=4YdfF-kT_z9GgV6yi-APGI0myBQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjw1oDr8OXTAhWk5oMKHUzrB7cQ6AEINzAD#v=onepage&q=inadi and white ex…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:50 PM
1

Here you go you fucking piece of shit: You may have some sense that the complaining witness in a domestic violence case is required to sign “the complaint” in order to permit the charges to go forward against you. While this may frequently be true, as in most things related to the law, it is a little more complicated than that. http://www.nycdomesticviolence.com/not-signing-complaint-in-domes/ Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:34 PM
1

No, you moron our discussion is limited to assault cases. I keep trying to call your attention to the details but you are too stupid to understand. Now, it is your belief that the Inadi case and the White case went all the way to the Supreme Court because the victims are never needed to testify and because they were never needed to testify and those cases were just to reaffirm that longstanding rule. You are fucking hilarious. You are just incapable of using logic.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:15 PM
1

Bullshit, that was the other discussion my comment was only about why the mother might not want to cooperate with the prosecution of the girls.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:02 PM
1

Ah, the sick mindset of wanting to protect her son, yeah how terrible.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 04:37 PM
1

lol, the world I've made up, god you are so stupid. I didn't say that you are interested in child pornography you dumb fuck, I was referring to the fact that a prosecutor could bring charges in regard to the video without needing witness testimony. Holy fuck, follow the fucking conversation dumb ass. You are just completely unable to follow a process without drawing an unwarranted conclusion. The whole fucking point to the discussion regarding the Inadi case is that they made an EXCEPTION to the…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 04:24 PM
1

None and justice is relative so victims don't necessarily see jail time as justice anyway.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:13 PM
1

Shit you are so stupid I can't believe I'm having this conversation. You can't even read the links, so really I'm surprised you can even type. I already pointed out to you that your own link discusses the 6th Amendment and the reason why a prosecutor can't bring an assault case without the victim's testimony. I don't know why I bother since you are too stupid to understand it, but here it is You are so retarded it is mind boggling. I specifically mentioned that we are talking about assault case,…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:09 PM
1

Like I said, you have no idea what you are talking about. You know nothing about the process of a criminal prosecution. Once a statement is taken from the victim in most cases there is no other contact between the prosecution and the victim until the trial. The prosecutors only interest is in making sure that the victim shows up in court, they don't give a fuck about helping the victim because it isn't their job.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:27 PM
1

Your stupidity just keeps on going doesn't it. Can you really not figure out how the process works? In order for someone to be charged with a crime, papers have to be filed in court. What do you think goes in those papers? Why don't you find out what an "Information" is and what needs to be included in it. Here is a simple explanation of how a prosecutor brings charges, but I doubt you can understand it Here is some really good information which you will also not understand, and involves slightl…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:24 PM
1

Nope. Criminal prosecution doesn't do any of those things for him, you have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:40 PM
1

God damn you are dumb. Like I said three or four comments previously, there is a difference between initiating a prosecution and dropping a case after it has started. Every link you provided has to do with criminal cases that have already been filed. Does being as stupid as you are actually hurt? The first link you cited even has a quote from the defense attorney that they will appeal the decision on the 6th Amendment. The second link you provided proves my point: The prosecutor may choose not t…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:32 PM
1

Yes, but your feels=reals is bullshit. See if you can find any actual evidence that prosecution helps the victim.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:20 PM
0

I ask how it helps the victim and your answer is that it helps the victim. Brilliant.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:19 PM
1

So you agree with me.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:28 PM
1

You are so fucking stupid I can't even begin to explain to you the difference between a criminal prosecution and child protective services.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:26 PM
2

Sure, no problem. Punishment is useless to the victim, so there is no reason for the mother to care if they are prosecuted. Punishment is a deterrent for other potential future criminals, so it serves some purpose. Helping victims is more beneficial to society over all because it calls more attention to the people who need help and to the detrimental effects of crimes, so we should focus on it more.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:49 AM
1

Yeah, totally reprehensible to understand that the mother is not sickening and unbelievable.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:40 AM
1

You need to read my comment more carefully because I don't think you understood anything about this situation. My comment was about the mother.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:38 AM
2

That's a much better reason.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:19 AM
0

How is that relevant to my comment? Did you mean to reply to someone else?
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:14 AM
1

Oh you have never heard of the 6th amendment? Oh you think dropping charges after a complaint has been filed is the same thing as never filing the complaint? You are a moron.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:55 AM
1

So your point isn't that you can't understand? I will explain it to you. Maybe the mother spoke to the parents of the girls and they said that they would pay for the boy's injuries and that the amount they would pay would be more if the girls are not charged with a crime because the boy wouldn't sign an affidavit or testify.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:51 AM
0

Why wouldn't he worry about what everyone in his town will think about him and how all the kids will treat him? An adult telling him not to worry about it doesn't make it go away. Are you really that naive? I'm not sure you know how to read. Have you ever seen the word "more" before? See I'm contrasting the way to treat children with the way we treat adults. The word "more" does connote an absolute amount, it refers to a relative amount you fucking retard.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:49 AM
2

Seems like you are agreeing with me, why would you do that?
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:46 AM
1

That is a very reasonable position that I don't disagree with.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:44 AM
1

I specifically wrote that these girls should be punished so that I could make a broader point. The people "assuming" things are just angry motherfuckers who can't control themselves.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:43 AM
0

I did not label this as kids fucking up.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:41 AM
2

I didn't find it, but maybe you are right and if you are right, those people are wrong.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:38 AM
-7

Holy shit, you guys are fucking incapable of having a discussion.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:29 PM
-2

Bullshit you fucking liar.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:28 PM
-11

So, you admit you are lying? I never said these girls shouldn't be punished you fucking liar.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:22 PM
7

I haven't found that claim anywhere, but I did find this http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/why-i-met-my-rapist-one-woman-explains-how-a-face-to-face-meeting-brought-closure-a6669261.html and other claims that seeing the perpetrator punished does not give closure http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/death-penalty-bring-closure-victims-family/ http://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-closure-possible/ Victim advocates who say that are wrong.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:19 PM
-15

Wrong. Quote me or admit you are lying.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:35 PM
-11

That the mother doesn't care about sending messages. Maybe the boy is worried that if he goes forward and testifies against the girls that other people in his community will be angry at him or think that he is a pussy, so his mom is taking the blame. Maybe the mom knows the girls and knows that it was a stupid mistake and that she wouldn't want her son's life to be ruined if he did the same thing. Maybe the mom is negotiating a settlement payment from the girls parents and agreed not to seek any…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:25 PM
-1

In order to prosecute the girls, the boy has to sign a statement and agree to testify in court. Since the boy is under age his mother has to consent to his agreement. Maybe the boy doesn't want to prosecute for various reasons and his mother is taking the blame for him.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:08 PM
-2

How does prosecuting a criminal help the victim? Can't she care about her son and try to help him recover without giving a fuck if the girls are punished? I'm not arguing the girls should be punished, just talking about whether the mother is a bad mother for not wanting punishment.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:06 PM
-7

It isn't unbelievable or sickening that the mom is concerned about the lives of the girls. The girls should 100% be properly prosecuted for what they did, but don't blame the mother for being a caring person, it's not like prosecuting the girls will help her son get better.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:02 PM
1

So the process is that an accusation of sexual assault is an assault no matter whether the facts of the accusation actually equal sexual assault? How can that make sense to anyone?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:06 PM
14

I feel raped whenever someone claims that they were raped without being raped.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 06:59 PM
2

If the toilet has a lid, then I close it every time I use it. Why do toilet's have lids at all? My thinking is that if the lid is closed, then you know the person before you probably flushed and didn't leave a huge mess, because someone who makes a huge mess and doesn't flush, also doesn't close the lid.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 03:29 PM
-3

Hopefully there will be a test soon: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/scientists-test-use-virtual-reality-diagnose-pedophilia/ The problem really is that obviously someone who is a pedophile will try to get a job where they have the opportunity to molest children, therefore people are naturally suspicious of those who want to work with children. People's fears are hugely exaggerated because such a small percentage of men are actually pedophiles, but we live in a culture where exaggerating fea…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:28 PM
3

But that's the point. The separations and distinctions are not universal or determined fairly, it's just a mix of different policies that result in all kinds of unfair outcomes. Why isn't there a basketball league for people under 6'? Why isn't there an ice hockey league for people who can't skate? Why isn't there a ski race for people who are clumsy? We come up with all kinds of arbitrary distinctions all the time and none of it matters anyway. Feminists are each focused on some issue that they…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:22 PM
8

False accusations perpetuate rape culture. There is no way that we can stop rape until these false accusations stop.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 03:27 PM
2

The idea that we can't celebrate the fastest and celebrate effort is a problem. Instead of choosing between a winner's trophy and trophies for participation we can have both.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 03:20 PM
1

That's easy, just keep the smart kids from learning anything. Or maybe the idea that there is a race and a finish line in life outside of actual races is the problem. Maybe we are all on the same team trying to accomplish something together and the best of us should be helping those who need it.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 03:17 PM
18

Just like they separate wrestling by weight, running by distance, and salaries by race.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 03:11 PM
7

Mankind is the fucking guy's name, how the hell are you supposed to refer to him? Fucking cactus jack?
/r/MensRights31/03/17 12:40 PM
1

Depends on what the women are like.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 09:39 PM
2

Alright, suppose you had a choice. You can have sex with the frumpy 6 while wearing a VR headset where you are fucking the 9, or have real sex with the 9 while having VR sex with the 6? Since the issue is all about what is happening in your brain, then even just imagining you are having sex with a 9 while actually having sex with a 6 is better than actually having sex with a 9 while thinking about a 6.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 11:57 PM
3

But what does that have to do with sex? Isn't this question just about whether you would have sex with women based on other qualifications, not whether you would talk to them or hang out with them. The weird thing is that being more beautiful doesn't make the physical sex any better or worse. I would never choose which woman to have a conversation with based on their looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 11:39 PM
11

I volunteer to be part of this experiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 11:35 PM
3

Do people think that gay men are a different species?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:00 AM
6

I was there when my son was born, never saw this happen.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:29 AM
1

I've talked to pretty girls who said they get less attention than their friends because guys were more intimidated. The reason you need a proper survey is because our opinions don't prove anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 06:00 PM
1

The pictures you used are shitty. Vicky Narni looks like she has something wrong with her eyes, and you included huge breasts in the picture. Heidi Wheeler looks like she got caught making Beyonce face in the picture you used. Nothing about what you did predicts the likelihood of any of those women getting hit on anywhere by anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 05:36 PM
6

Yes, that's why I'm asking. If births to unwed mothers is up and crime is down, then what's up with the percentages now? 1980: 10 rapes total 8 from single mother households 2016: 4 rapes total ? from single mother households How much could the percentage have gone up from 80% in 1978 to account for the huge increase in single mother households?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 10:29 PM
4

Is there any evidence that there is no male role model living in those homes? The statistics are "unwed" mothers. We can't tell if the father or mom's boyfriend is living with them from these statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 10:20 PM
6

Have the percentages changed from the 1980s because crime is down, so if such a large percentage of crime is coming from single mother homes, is that percentage much larger now? Also, with so many single mother homes, are there way more single men living in their own homes, or do these stats not account for unwed parents still living together?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 10:18 PM
-6

Good thing that didn't happen to Trump in Russia! Happy!
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:34 PM
2

Does anyone have any idea what a potential rapist is or how you would identify one? Is a potential rapist like a potential sandwich?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 07:52 PM
2

So you even though it was never discussed, you would have pursued your career instead of having kids if you hadn't thought that a court would require your ex to support you, no matter that you were the one who cheated and filed for divorce? Sounds totally reasonable I guess you are right.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:00 AM
4

And that makes them incapable of protecting their own interests. "Hey, since I'm staying home with the kids instead of working on my career can we agree on something to protect me, if we get divorced? No? Ok, never mind."
/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:46 AM
10

It only "needs to exist" if you accept that one party in a marriage has the right to be taken care of like a child.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:32 PM
0

Not everyone is like those British Beefeater guys who aren't allowed to move.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/17 08:53 PM
-2

I think I would rather never know, also I think she is making the story up, those two girls look a lot like him.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 03:53 PM
2

Number 13 is really important to remember at all times. You could sell coaching classes and books teaching just 13 for people to use in all social situations.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 05:40 PM
3

Punishing a child for lying doesn't make up for attempting to prosecute a 12 year old.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 02:55 AM
5

What is this? Actual evidence? Get the fuck out of here, Trump supporters don't need evidence!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 10:03 PM
2

She was a butter face.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter