TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wicnfuai Archive

View 12 posts and 181 comments by wicnfuai on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
392

Intactivismwicnfuai/r/MensRights02/01/21 09:17 PM
198

Discriminationwicnfuai/r/MensRights12/04/26 08:40 PM
134

Social Issueswicnfuai/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:56 PM
61

Social Issueswicnfuai/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:19 AM
34

Intactivismwicnfuai/r/MensRights07/03/21 07:10 PM
10

Intactivismwicnfuai/r/MensRights13/11/20 03:22 PM
8

Social Issueswicnfuai/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:56 PM
8

Social Issueswicnfuai/r/MensRights21/11/20 04:32 AM
2

Social Issueswicnfuai/r/MensRights20/12/20 01:34 AM
1

Intactivismwicnfuai/r/MensRights02/01/21 07:33 PM
1

Activism/Supportwicnfuai/r/MensRights02/01/21 07:03 PM
0

Anti-MRMwicnfuai/r/MensRights31/01/21 10:19 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

The link to the post is attached. You don't need an account to view it. Using the translate feature, the text translated to English says "When the couple wants to know the baby's gender, but the boy is showing off 🤣🤣🤣"
/r/MensRights12/04/26 09:49 PM
14

People type like that everywhere not just Twitter. I saw the same thing on Instagram where the post intentionally zoomed in on a male infants genitals sexualizing it and the comments were doing the same. And while on Reddit there might be more people calling it out, I have no doubt the majority of people would be making similar sexual comments
/r/MensRights12/04/26 09:47 PM
2

Agreed. Yes there are dividers in some urinals but in my experience, there's still a lot of public bathrooms with no dividers between the urinals. Or the dividers are extremely small. I'm personally for improving the dividers, making them longer/wider. Giving men more privacy is not a bad thing.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 06:19 PM
6

The frenulum will never be fully preserved in a circumcision because it connects the head of the penis to the inner tip of the foreskin, part of the ridged band. The ridged band is completely removed during the procedure, thus removing the part of the frenulum that was connected to it. At best, the victim will have a partial frenulum Edit: NSFW image of an intact man's frenulum. You can see how the fully preserved frenulum is a webbed-like connection to the underside head of the penis and the in…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:10 PM
7

Those people think female circumcision=clitorectomy so they say it's worse than male circumcision. Semantically that doesn't even make sense. Circumcision derives from 2 Latin words: circum=around and caedere=to cut. A clitorectomy is quite literally not a circumcision. A labiaplasty would be much more accurate because you're cutting the skin around the vagina. Or even a clitoral hood removal because you're mostly cutting around the clitoris. Needless to say, any cutting of the genitals on any b…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:07 AM
2

There needs to be a massive cultural change. I watched Eric Clopper's Intact Global live stream last week and it was mentioned "the law doesn't change the culture, the culture changes the law" Hopefully Japanese influence can help. Many of my friends idolize Japan and think they have a role model society. Maybe them learning Japan doesn't practice genital cutting might make them against it
/r/MensRights08/09/24 02:27 PM
6

First time I'm hearing if this term but I assume it's addressing the common thought that if a a female rapes a male and the male orgasms, that means he enjoyed it and he wasn't actually raped.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 02:06 PM
2

I obviously don't believe that, however, I'm going to use this line with other people because it's short but gets the point across effectively.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 02:03 PM
9

Yeah it's the "real man" comments that raised my eyebrows. If you were the guy in this video and you didn't give up your seat, that's not "real man" behavior
/r/MensRights11/03/23 02:07 AM
9

I don't think he moved because he thought it was right because otherwise he would have given up his seat earlier without the guy having to tap his shoulder. But the impression I'm getting is that if he refused to get up or if we waved his crutches to show he's injured, he is less of a "real man", at least according to those YouTube commenters
/r/MensRights11/03/23 02:06 AM
9

If I was that woman, I would be mortified that a an injured person felt the need to offer me their seat. This is not doing something nice for women
/r/MensRights11/03/23 01:21 AM
12

Sorry that happened to you. I would offer my seat not just to an injured person but even a healthy person, regardless of gender or age. I just don't understand how people in that video's comment section are saying he's a "real man". Those same people would probably criticize you for being for being in crutches and expecting someone to offer you their seat
/r/MensRights11/03/23 01:16 AM
1

I didn't type my point from the context of a vacuum, I typed my point based on the world we are living in right now.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:17 AM
1

But again, even if single mothers/lesbian parents are skinning their sons alive, that doesn't contradict my point. I am making the point that the father plays a very important role in this decision. This is a personal anecdote, my father is not cut and I am also not cut. But I have no doubt that if he was cut, I most likely would be cut as well. My mother is a nurse and probably has fed the BS that MGM is a health benefit. It might have been my father's Circumcision status that saved me from get…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:58 AM
1

90% of circumcised fathers choose to have their sons circumcised. The study was done in Denver by the WHO in 2007. On page 10 (ignoring the page numbers at the bottom), the first paragraph under "Social desirability". http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43749/9789241596169_eng.pdf;jsessionid=25C9EA8F141599F378D99AE92F30477E?sequence=1 And which part of my comment was wrong? I did never denied women also advocate for MGM.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:08 PM
0

Unfortunately on the topic of MGM, many times it is the father that desires to have his son skinned alive. The father's logic is "I want want my son to look like me"
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:23 PM
15

Yes. Boobs does not equal penis. Vulva area and clitoris would be equivalent to penis/scrotum. If someone sent me an unsolicited boob pic, I would be annoyed and angry but it would be a completely different level of anger and disgust if they sent me a vulva pic Although a fun social experiment I saw a couple years ago, photoshop male nipples on woman boobs and photoshop female nipples on a man's bare chest and see what would happen.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 04:31 PM
2

Well I didn't disagree with the sexual connotation, I said the title "does have" it. But I also said that you could give it another name that has nothing to do with sex and the result would still be the same. Now the word 'outrage' might be an exaggeration, I don't think there were protests. But apparently the UK blocked Wikipedia pages containing the album cover. And mainstream outlets do not show the image in its original state unlike with Nirvana. And I keep on going back to this, what Nirvan…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 02:39 AM
3

I saw it, and that wasn't showing nearly as much as the Nirvana cover. Plus, nowadays blind faith cover has been censored in most places (maybe not inside stores though). But that shows how the public must have reacted to the image. If it wasn't a big deal, people wouldn't have gone through the work of censoring it almost everywhere
/r/MensRights25/08/21 10:11 PM
5

The name "Virgin Killer" does have sexual connotations, but you could name it anything, even the most bland name and it still would garner massive outrage. Blind Faith has a more tame name and that album cover is also deemed unacceptable. With both albums not showing the groin area but Nirvana does.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:56 PM
3

Virgin Killer album is the main one. Another one is from Blind Faith. The catch is that they are not babies, so comparing album covers like this can only go so far. The groin area is not shown in either of those album covers but most people consider them much more controversial than Nirvana. But just because one is a baby and not an older child does not mean it is better to completely show is groin area.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:24 PM
9

My opinion is that if the baby was female, more people would think it was porn. Again, it is speculation because it didn't happen but I see the outrage of female children being shown in other bands album covers, even though they're not showing the groin area, and that led me to this thought. Obviously a baby naked is not porn. But it appears there are people who think that only applies for males but not females.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 06:17 PM
14

The groin area wasn't shown and it was still much more controversial than nirvana's album cover, even though you could see everything. Virgin Killer's picture has been removed in many places or at least censored. It's probably dangerous to even look it up, but Nirvana is not dangerous to look up because all the major outlets are showing it.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:27 PM
1

I thought about that in the past. What if males were given more "private parts" than females. And generally speaking males were more covered than females. Would females be more attracted to males?
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:23 PM
1

Sorry about that, idk if this would help but you could delete your comments on this post and see if that might change their decision?
/r/MensRights25/08/21 04:40 PM
7

Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned the lawsuit because it's not really important, I just brought it up because it is on the news recently. My point is that male child nudity appears to be seen as "more normal" than if it was a female child. This example might not be the most accurate but statue makers make male children statues that are peeing. I have never seen that for female children. Stuff like this makes me think male nudity has been seen as more acceptable than female nudity. If this dealt w…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 04:39 PM
6

Oh man, was it this post specifically or this sub? Because people who participate in this sub get banned in other places. But if it was because of this post, it very loosely proves my point about the double standard
/r/MensRights25/08/21 04:26 PM
7

Yeah, maybe the lawsuit is questionable. But the underlying point is the same. Sometimes I feel like I'm yelling at a brick wall because so many people are of the opinion of "what's the big deal", but at the same time they maintain a gender-based double standard
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:26 PM
1

Well if the art involves adults, I don't see a problem with it. But this is of a child. Other bands have included female children on their album cover and people got much more outraged at those than at this Nirvana one. Even though from the angle the baby is swimming, a female does not show as much as a male. Also speaking of statues, I also find it creepy that people make fountain statues of little boys peeing. Why on earth would someone do that? I have never seen a statue of a little girl peei…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:23 PM
9

I agree, I honestly do not see the "art" in it. I feel like people don't respect bodily privacy when it involves male children but they respect the privacy for female children. There are instances where album covers showed female children, and that resulted in massive outrage. I read about an example, Virgin Killer. People got so angry at that, but with Nirvana, the number of angry people appeared to much smaller even though it exposes a lot more.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:15 PM
5

IIRC, I don't think that album cover actually showed the groin area. Facebook banned that album cover as well. Maybe I'm thinking too much into it, but I think it was because it depicted both sexes that Facebook banned it, it is was only males they wouldn't. That is speculation though, I can't prove it
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:12 PM
9

But most people don't have a problem with the baby being male. There are a handful of people who might have a problem, but it seems they are a small minority. Edit: The point being that there would be a lot more outrage if the baby was female, even though much less would be shown than what a male baby shows
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:08 PM
18

Because society believes boys enjoy it or boys enjoy being sexually harassed/assaulted, or worse. And men are big proponents of this. I can't even count how many times men have said "where was she when I was in school" when teachers have been caught sleeping with middle schoolers.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 02:02 PM
9

Those same men will say "where was she when I was a kid".
/r/MensRights13/03/21 06:58 PM
6

For some reason, no other topic gets me as riled up as this one. Fortunately, I've been seeing a lot of moms on Facebook angrily come out against mutilating infant boys genitals. Like on this post: Edit: I don't know if you can see the comments. I'll try to fix the link https://www.facebook.com/172212266252130/posts/2162298310576839/?d=n Edit2: but here are some comments: It makes me want to throw up that I put my first son through this. I am so angry that this is what is perceived as “normal” “…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 02:29 AM
3

This also works against men. People falsely believe a woman cannot rape a man. What's one reason why? Well if we constantly are highlighting how horny men are, people use that to say "well women aren't as horny, so they can't rape a man". Furthermore, if the man is usually horny, people will say "well he enjoyed it" if he was raped. They even say that for boys too in which women committed statutory rape with them. I don't know exactly the endgame is with these type of posts. Men are hornier than…
/r/MensRights09/03/21 04:34 AM
1

Via the embedded link, please check out Prince Maloba's work in Kenya and Uganda on fighting against child circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 07:01 PM
8

Maybe, I think it's called a sushi chop. But idk if it's a Tiktok challenge, I saw this several years ago. But regardless, we actually cannot blame the women/girls for this because the boys/men are the ones who think it's funny and they are eager to participate in crap like this.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 03:33 AM
0

And the people who will be on this woman's side are men. Most women I know would hate this woman if they found out about her.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 01:25 AM
1

From what I've seen, Amy was condemned by both men and women for this joke
/r/MensRights13/02/21 07:19 PM
3

I know what the Covenant is. But that does not change the point I was making.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 10:26 PM
3

I only know the Torah, and it doesn't say Adam was circumcised, because the circumcision covenant started with Abraham. Maybe if Jews look at outside sources they might get reach that conclusion? And if they believe Yahweh is circumcised, well, then they are saying Yahweh has a penis? Do they really believe that?
/r/MensRights05/02/21 08:41 PM
5

Also, circumcision does not make sense for atheism nor for (monotheistic) religious people. The religious person faces a dilemma that their perfect, flawless God made his creation flawed. But nowhere in their scriptures does it say that their perfect God's creation is physically flawed. Mentally they're flawed sure, because they fall into sin. But physically they are made in the image of their perfect God. For the atheist, they face a dilemma of how humans evolved for thousands of years with a p…
/r/MensRights05/02/21 05:16 PM
11

Tell us how it goes
/r/MensRights04/02/21 02:35 AM
1

I know there are plenty of normal men in the show, but what do you think is the answer to the 2nd paragraph in the post? The answer usually reveals an underlying stereotype against male persona as it is shown in family friendly shows
/r/MensRights01/02/21 10:12 PM
2

Should have mentioned this earlier but are they family friendly shows? Mr Bean is considered in that category
/r/MensRights01/02/21 10:10 PM
1

I haven't heard of Carry On show, but from what I looked up, it appears you're right. But I forgot to mention in the post, Mr Bean is a show. Was Carry On made for kids too? And with Mr Bean, I feel like the global audience was much larger too
/r/MensRights01/02/21 12:51 AM
1

Sorry, I guess my previous question won't be my last one after all. I wasn't talking about the cartoons, I was talking about the live action Mr. Bean show and Diary of a Whimpy Kid 2012 version, also live action. The vast majority of the time, nudity is seen as amusing in kids shows if the nude/semi nude character is male. If you and I don't believe female nudity is not amusing, the rest of society does, and they are the ones making the kids shows. To the stair example, it isn't that a male fall…
/r/MensRights01/02/21 12:34 AM
1

Ah, so I think I now realize this whole thing might be a "me issue". In my eyes, I view the nudity thing as humiliation. So it is acceptable to show males being humiliated naked but not acceptable to show humiliated females. And again, this is for a kids show. If it was a rated r movie, I wouldn't really care. But we're teaching kids that male nudity is funny and more acceptable than female nudity. And growing up into the US, I saw kids do indeed believe that.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 12:05 AM
1

Ok I see your point. One last question though (hopefully). I know you said 30 years ago people would laugh if someone fell down a staircase regardless of who it was. So taking mr bean in that pool episode where we was trying to escape the pool naked and eventually got caught by a group of women, or Greg when we was only wearing underwear and eventually got trapped inside an old women's changing room (which i don't believe they even showed anything there). If Bean and Greg were both female, and t…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 11:49 PM
3

True those shows characters usually are not made for the intent to send a message. But even in Harry Potter, if Hermione was a clumsy and goofy character, I think that may not sit well with many families. Obviously I can't prove this, but this is just what I think would happen. And something I should have mentioned earlier, I'm mainly talking about children's movies. Even is a children's film is not trying to send a message out, many times the child viewer will still get some kind of message out…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 11:21 PM
3

I don't think it's just mega-SJWs that would be upset if Mr. Bean was a woman. I think it's contemporary society collectively who would be upset. I know Mr. Bean himself is not a directly aimed at attacking the male persona, but when you start to ask some 'why' and "what if" questions, you'll start to see that the answers to those questions stem from ideas that are potentially damaging the campaign to improve how we view men/males in our society. I guess Diary of a whimpy kid would be another ex…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 10:59 PM
1

Not sure why you went with a personal attack, but in any case, I disagree because I believe in stereotyping people equally. Let men play the idiotic character. But if you answer the question at the end of the post, and the answer is 'no', then that is not stereotyping equally. Which, IMO, can only happen if you agree with the stereotype that males are inherently foolish and females are not.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 10:48 PM
10

Yes, religion and tradition will make you rationalize a LOT of stuff which otherwise would be irrational.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 05:00 AM
113

And you'll see men saying "where was she when I was in middle school". The thing is that women are seen as "hot", so they are not seen as creepy as men are. Or they are seen as "cute", so they are seen as harmless. Furthermore, rape is usually seen as penetrating someone, and since females (usually) can't penetrate males, the rape is not seen as damaging to the male victim. I'm angry at the news, but I've seen too many double standards regarding this that I'm not surprised anymore a
/r/MensRights26/01/21 06:17 PM
9

And somehow even in a 1st world country like the U.S., that thought is way too hard for people to comprehend
/r/MensRights03/01/21 06:57 PM
1

I personally don't know, the information comes the Facebook page "Circumcised men who complain".
/r/MensRights03/01/21 05:45 PM
6

I also don't like facebook, but there are a lot very good intactivists over there, that's why I still have an account
/r/MensRights03/01/21 05:28 PM
4

Good side. MOGiS eV is a German organization that supports genital autonomy world wide.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 12:26 PM
17

Circumcised men who complain Facebook group. You may need an account to access the group. If you don't have an account, I'll paste the posts, as the info about these pictures comes from this source. For the first picture: Another historical event has been written to defend defenceless children against circumcision in lies of ending HIV in Africa in Western Kenya. Today's anti-child protests is enough evidence that people don't want circumcision and child circumcision should be ban.HIV can only b…
/r/MensRights02/01/21 09:22 PM
2

Same with me. I want to like Arab culture, because their food and music are amazing. But most of them they are excessive mutilators
/r/MensRights02/01/21 05:40 PM
2

Yeah, and that's kind of an issue I have regarding boobs. You increase the number of "private parts" in females than in males. The male only has 1 private area but the female has 2. So a male can be shown completely naked and a female will show her boobs, but her groin area is still covered, thus not making her completely naked and partially clothed. And even then, you mentioned they only showed the boobs in the manga. Not only do they think a penis is less private than a vagina or clitoris, the…
/r/MensRights02/01/21 04:24 PM
4

I have noticed this for many years, and not just anime. But as it relates to anime, sure they'll show mini skirts and bikinis and probably some butt. But not actual nudity. No vagina or clitoris. But penis/scrotum is fine apparently. Didn't Dragon Ball Z have a naked goku which showed his penis? And the female equivalent would be less drawing, it would literally just be a line to show a vulva, which doesn't even show the vagina or clitoris. But even that would be too in appropriate and outrage w…
/r/MensRights01/01/21 01:31 PM
1

Well after addressing all your claims, I really don't know what else to tell you
/r/MensRights31/12/20 09:18 PM
1

I know it's part of the same definition. But if we take it as a clarification, that gives even more credence to my response to it. It's not another definition, in fact it is giving more information on the definition in case there was any confusion. And to that, I responded, as well as the I clarified definition. But again, I have already showed you how I am not excusing abusive women, even in a semantic sense.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 08:48 PM
1

stating an external cause for the behavior is that I already said multiple times that the cues from men are not the origins of abuse. "External cause" does not apply because that is not my argument. And it appears you only focused on one part of the definition, but I addressed both parts, especially in the part where I said I do not excuse a straight person acting hostile towards a gay person because that is the cues he/she received from another gay person. You can't just ignore my response to t…
/r/MensRights31/12/20 08:32 PM
1

please read what I said, i am saying in one scenario that is comparable to your argument No, it is not comparable, because I repeatedly said my argument does not say the origin of abuse by women comes from men. You said if you are saying that the reason why he was abusive because he was taking his cues from my mother, yes you would be. Because you said the reason why, that does not make it comparable to my argument. you are saying in general as well and you literally are responding to my stateme…
/r/MensRights31/12/20 08:10 PM
1

if you are saying that the reason why he was abusive because he was taking his cues from my mother, yes you would be If that is the case, you cannot say that I am giving women excuses because I am giving everyone an excuse apparently. If everyone has something, then no particular group can claim it, that particular group being the abusive women receiving excuses. your comparing two different domains the converse would be if men take their cues from women with regards to abuse as you are saying t…
/r/MensRights31/12/20 06:52 PM
1

just because you said it may have come from my mother doesn't mean you arent ALSO giving her an excuse. I am not giving her an excuse because I already expressed my belief that she should be held accountable. By that same token, am I giving your father an excuse because I said your mother was influencing him? Saying that most women take their cues from men creates an argument were the default scenario is that woman have an excuse (due to the fact that women are so susceptible to male influence) …
/r/MensRights31/12/20 03:52 PM
1

"My point wasn't that women can't make up their mind, the point was for the most part, women takes cues from men." , that's giving her an excuse No that is not. Please stop making that false assumption. I've said earlier that I will blame both men and women and expressed that women should be held accountable. And I even gave the reason in the proceeding sentence: " I have seen way too many examples where if the mother is abusing her son, the father either does nothing, or is joking about it or e…
/r/MensRights31/12/20 04:20 AM
1

Late response, but still I disagree. I am not focusing only on your personal life. I am focusing on society in general. Infant circumcision is the biggest example I brought up. Look at the biggest proponents of that, they are men. Humiliating forms of male nudity in film. Also, supported by men. The example that a male child should take the role of an adult simply because that's his duty as a male. These are burdens imposed by men on other males. And going back to your personal life (which again…
/r/MensRights31/12/20 02:09 AM
7

And the thing is, it's the male directors and writers who come up with these roles. The the male actors gladly go along with it. Sigh
/r/MensRights30/12/20 01:14 AM
2

Gina Haspel
/r/MensRights23/12/20 06:11 PM
-5

I disagree about infant circumcision. If we assume Abraham in the Biblical narrative was a patriarch, then infant circumcision was started by a patriarch. If we go outside the Bible, we can theorize that infant circumcision was not a result of a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 05:43 PM
1

But, hypothetically speaking, it's still the men who make decisions. Even if 100% of the policies they make are against men, they're still the decision makers.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 05:37 PM
6

I already realized the obstacle men pose to men's rights movement. In fact; I think there are ways to prove they are the biggest obstacle.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 02:19 AM
4

True, because the same argument can and will be used against men. But I don't think this warranted a murder via a hammer. The human psyche is complex, she might have had enough and snapped. But I cannot agree that justified the act.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 04:47 AM
1

I believe you misrepresented my point. I never said women should not be held liable for actions they do against men, because they should be held liable. And I am not saying that "all the shitty women in your life was because of men". That's a complete misrepresentation of what I am saying. I am saying to recognize that there are men actively fighting against MRM. Those same men encourage and support people like your ex and prod her to keep doing whatever it is she's doing. Women also will do the…
/r/MensRights21/12/20 04:37 AM
1

Women can make up their mind based on a variety of factors, which includes what men think of MRM. I asked before, if you had a father figure, did he do anything to fight against abuses by your mother? If you didn't have a father figure, then that is an example of a woman being against MRM without any male input, which I said can happen. But if you had a father, I would like to know what he did. The examples I had in my post are outside my personal life. This is the stuff I see constantly in soci…
/r/MensRights21/12/20 02:12 AM
0

Good catch, the silence from men is definitely impactful
/r/MensRights20/12/20 11:50 PM
1

My point wasn't that women can't make up their mind, the point was for the most part, women takes cues from men. Assuming you had a father/father figure in your life, did he fight back against your mother's abuse? Or did he join in or remain silent (silence is something I forgot to include in my post). If your father tried to protect you against your mother's abuse, then good on him, but I believe he is in the minority. I have seen way too many examples where if the mother is abusing her son, th…
/r/MensRights20/12/20 11:49 PM
20

To me, the comment about the rockwall is an example of toxins masculinity. I bet some parents would have a son no older than 10 years and he is expected to save his older sister twice and his mother. Doesn't matter if they're twice as strong, that's his duty as a male . That is toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 11:20 PM
1

And look at the author of that article. Written by a man. And the actor who allegedly was in the "penis scene" is joking around on Twitter about it. And again, these are kids, not adults. The way the article constantly says the word "dick" while talking about a child is mind bogglingly disturbing. It's so dumb that it's the men themselves who allow this kind of stuff to be joked about.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 03:52 AM
3

Thank you, it's a dishonest argument when people automatically assume clitorectomy when they hear female circumcision. But regardless, It obviously should be banned amongst children.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 02:18 AM
1

It should have been in response to the other comment that replied " Like what the actual fuck was the glorification of the policeman killing those rapists? Are people really glorifying murder????" I know the police in India are very corrupt. When I was young I went there are saw the bribery myself. Technically the police account could be fake. But it could be real. Regardless of police corruption, if you are only going to question the police narrative about the killing, you can also do the same …
/r/MensRights17/12/20 06:50 PM
3

If we question the police account, which is a legitimate thing to do, then there will be no definite explanation as to what happened when the killings occurred. Also, the accused are already dead, I think you meant "believe the accuser" or "believe the accused is guilty" or something similar. The 4 men reportedly confessed to the police to the murder and rape. And the instigation was in process, there was not "not an attempt" at one. However if you question the police account, you will either no…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 06:21 PM
11

I'm going to get downvoted to hell, but I think this needs to be said. In the case last year when the rape suspects were killed, they allegedly killed the victim after the rape and dumped her body on the road side. Then when police caught them and took them to the crime scene, they tried to steal the officer's gun. These men did not display any sign of remorse for what they did. I am not going to condemn people being happy that they are dead. But back to the article, obviously it's dumb. Males c…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:15 PM
14

Very sorry to here that. Hope you are doing better now
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:34 PM
1

I'm very sorry that happened to you. But it seems like you understand exactly what I was getting at in my post. Whenever I try to tell people about this, they literally think I'm making a problem out of nothing. You are right about if you were a girl, this wouldn't have happened, or if it did, there would be severe consequences and maybe legal action. They wouldn't even dare touch your top. The sick reality is that even a female's chest (adult or child) is more private than a penis. And that's n…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 06:06 PM
1

Pretty baby and was and I think still is a pretty controversial movie. However, when it comes to American films, I think Pretty Baby is the only one that shows that kind of nudity, and from what I've read, her groin area wasnt seen, or extremely briefly seen. If I remember correctly, but correct me if I'm wrong. The movie "The Possession of Joel Delaney" showed a 13 year old boy forced to dance naked by his possessed uncle. That could be viewed as sexualization because of the dancing aspect, how…
/r/MensRights14/12/20 01:43 PM
4

Yeah, how they are joking about it is obviously hypocritical. It is true female and male children have indeed been shown naked in films before, mostly before 1990s and mainly in Europe and former USSR. However, I don't think a girl his age (12ish) would be in that role. I saw this movie way back in 2013 or 2014 but I had no idea this interview existed. The way they're joking about it is weird if you ask me. Edit: btw I asked a questionyesterday, "Is male nudity being normalized/seen as comedic i…
/r/MensRights14/12/20 03:23 AM
6

The answer to that, is yes. Society views women as essentially children. Thats why they can get away with a lot of things men cannot, you wouldn't punish a child the same way as an adult right?
/r/MensRights14/12/20 12:06 AM
5

Wait are you saying that the girls getting to go home is not an example of feminism?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:38 PM
2

That's right. Although I would disagree with the male patients and female providers. I have heard waaaay to many guys saying they want a female doctor because it would be "gay" if they had a male doctor. Maybe not those exact words but the idea is the same. But me personally, I felt uncomfortable when I was 14 and the female pediatrician did a physical on me. At the time, I didn't know I could ask for a male doctor. But even then, my friends would have called me gay. The other stuff you said I a…
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:09 PM
3

Now I know this is going to be extremely petty and trivial but bear with me. In the Simpsons, they would have never thought about doing that to Lisa right? She's skateboarding naked with with cleverly positioned objects covering her crotch? And for the "big reveal", the animators would even have to draw less than for Bart. Inside of a semi-oval, it would literally just be a line. I know skateboarding is not Lisa's thing, Bart does it in the opening credits. But replace skateboarding with somethi…
/r/MensRights13/12/20 02:46 AM
3

Lmao, well what else can you except from Reddit? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights13/12/20 02:21 AM
1

Thanks, I try to look at history in a honest way. Everybody has bias, but I try my best to put aside my biases and see stuff in a neutral light. I have interests in other countries too, but when it comes to Russia/CIS/USSR, there is way too much misleading information, so I did a little more research in this area. I really don't think women in STEM caused any issue in USSR. The Soviet system was flawed in many ways, but when it came to women's role in society, I don't think that was a real flaw.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 01:29 AM
2

Yes, the increase in military expenditures did play a major in their economic turmoil. They did spend more on military expenditures compared to GNP but that led to an increase in the budget deficit throughout the 80s, up to 7% from Western estimates. It's because of the deficit that they were able to actually increase spending for non-military and non-government expenditures, from what I read quoted by finance minister Gustev in LA Times. When I read "all their money", I take that to include dis…
/r/MensRights13/12/20 12:30 AM
6

Here's a really blunt answer from society: Society generally believes females that are kidnapped will be raped (vaginally penetrated by a penis). When people imagine that, they get horrified and have great sympathy for the female victim. Because males don't have vaginas, society (for the most part) does not believe males get raped when they get kidnapped (obviously many do get raped though). And even if society finds out the males were raped, they won't view it as horrific as rape of a vagina. S…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 10:52 PM
2

Oh ok, most of what I wrote was because you said "which is the exact reason USSR states failed" and I couldn't ignore it. But even then, I don't believe that is one of the reasons the USSR failed. And btw, when you say USSR states, are you saying post Soviet or while it was intact? My previous comment was assuming you meant before it collapsed. Anyway, every Russian woman and man I've spoken to who either lived during the Union, or their parents did, never said a word about this being a reason f…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 10:32 PM
7

I said women should not be discriminated against in any subject but they should not be given spots for the sake of diversity because that drives productivity down, which is the exact reason USSR states failed, and now she is calling me sexist. No, that is obviously not the reason the USSR failed. I have looked at what many Russians living in Russia currently have to say about why the USSR collapsed and literally zero of the answers said it was becomes "productivity became low because women were …
/r/MensRights12/12/20 10:07 PM
-4

In the hypothetical scenario I mentioned, it would be OP listening to the opinions of everyone in the class and only agreeing with the male students and disagreeing with all the female students, even if their opinion was right.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 06:54 PM
-7

Ok, just the 2 of you then no not sexist
/r/MensRights12/12/20 06:52 PM
-13

Obviously it wasn't sexist. I could possibly see it if you agreed with all the other males in the class and disagreed with all the females. But apart from that, a definite no.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:36 PM
6

Yeah, unfortunately I think DuckDuckGo's results have also been curated like Google's results, maybe to a lesser extend but still manipulated.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 12:32 AM
1

I'm not sure if the top one is first feminism. I thought first wave was during the late 19th and early 20th century when women were fighting for the right to vote and own property. Much of the top image quotes are from Andrea Dworkin but didn't she come along during the 1970s? IMO I think both are 2nd wave.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 12:11 AM
10

I think you're right. If a non men's rights activist comes along and sees the complaints about this, then it's the perfect fuel for them campaign against MRA, saying "look how sad and pathetic these people are, they hate women survivors of abuse". But there is a point to be made about Google only focusing on female survivors of abuse. It's true that in a technical sense this is not at the expense of men. But I would say in a practical sense it is at the expense of men because of the resulting la…
/r/MensRights08/12/20 11:56 PM
5

Very sorry to hear that. Hope you get all the strength and help you need
/r/MensRights08/12/20 05:40 AM
22

From what I've read on this, a male birth control pill is harder to develop than a female birth control pill because it's basically "easier to trick the body into thinking it's pregnant" than it is to kill the hundreds of millions of sperm in 1 ejaculation. Furthermore, it's risky in the sense that there might not be a simple "turn off, turn on" valve for sperm production. If you temporarily stop sperm production, it could be permanent or cause lasting effects. Someone more qualified than me can…
/r/MensRights07/12/20 08:44 PM
3

Most likely not. You would still ejaculate but it would either kill the sperm in the semen or possibly prevent it from mixing with semen temporarily. I'm not a scientist in this area so I probably got it wrong, but I'm pretty sure it will not prevent ejaculating.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 08:32 PM
39

There will also be conservative bias as well. They might say "well it's his own fault for being weaker than his wife. A man should always be the head of the household, a stronger person, etc"
/r/MensRights07/12/20 05:31 PM
9

From the thumbnail it looked like they were jumping him
/r/MensRights07/12/20 01:13 AM
5

I personally don't believe in a god, it's just a feel good expression to me
/r/MensRights06/12/20 12:26 AM
14

The infant mutilation happens mainly in America and Jewish families. In Islam, most of them are not cut as babies, they wait for a "sunnet", like when they are 3 years old or even as late as 10. That alone debunks the "health" benefit because they are waiting a couple years to do it.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 07:39 PM
3

Oh I missed the word 'half'. My bad
/r/MensRights05/12/20 06:22 PM
14

Yes, the "becoming a man" thing is commonly told to the boys and men. Such a dumb argument
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:57 PM
5

I think a generation is roughly 20 years. People don't have kids at 10 years old (at least they normally don't)
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:56 PM
59

It's even worse in some Islamic families. Some of them pose with the boy during the operation and smile like they're at Disney world. Unfortunately one case like this happened in Austria (I think) and the doctor accidentally cut his penis off because the boy was trying to position himself for the photo.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:56 PM
32

It's bad enough that they are getting circumcised but in my opinion, it's also a humiliating experience to be shown completely exposed like that in front of girls their own age. Like I can't even describe how messed up that is. I wish I could put it into words how WRONG this is. This is borderline perversion. Edit: Scratch that, it's flat out perversion, not borderline.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:27 PM
90

Yeah I've seen some videos of public circumcision videos on YouTube. Like 20 boys in a room with a female "healthcare worker" cutting them. Obviously this child circumcising wrong but. But this scenario is wrong too. At least give them some privacy, why the hell are you exposing the boys to the public? Sometimes even some girls are present there watching this. That's so messed up. Imagine 20 girls getting inner labia and clitoral hood cut in a room with their clitoris and vagina clearly shown to…
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:19 PM
433

God bless those young men in Kenya
/r/MensRights05/12/20 04:30 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights04/12/20 04:19 AM
4

But I think that is the conservative culture that teaches that. A more "socialistic" attitude would be that boys don't bow down to girls, they both are equal and have a chance to be an industrial worker.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 03:56 PM
1

It was a fail. I repeatedly asked direct yes or no questions to try to get a consistent argument from him but he always dodged the question and kept on trying to sing the praises of infant circumcision. I ended up not replying because it was a waste of time, however if someone comes across that post, they will know who was more consistent and who's logic is more sound.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 02:29 PM
1

Joined initially to ask a question on how to argue effectively against someone who was promoting male child circumcision.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 03:51 AM
3

I know you didn't say that, but I want others to see it if they were thinking that.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 06:44 PM
8

And a man being saved by a woman does not mean that he is any less of a man.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 06:37 PM
5

Was it this one posted a week ago? It was about a woman who failed a firefighter physical test but still passed.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 05:23 AM
10

Exactly, and in countries with those laws, because they are discriminatory against men, it makes female actions look less bad.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 04:43 AM
34

Article says this happened in Singapore. What is the status of women there? I’ve noticed in cultures where men are expected to be the caretakers of their wife and family, the actions of women are seen as less severe even if a man does the same action. Because she is basically slightly above a child status and you wouldn’t punish a child the same way as an adult?
/r/MensRights23/11/20 03:01 AM
1

Sorry, I didn’t mean to perpetuate rape culture. If I did, I genuinely apologize. But going back to that swim meet I mentioned earlier, I would rather be in the girl’s position than the boys because more of my body would be covered. And I’ve been in the hospital many times, had a catheter stuck in my urethra as well, however I was under anesthesia when they did it. But that’s in a hospital setting which is not as public as a pool, I view that as categorically different. And at least it was a fem…
/r/MensRights22/11/20 09:14 PM
1

It was a swimming class and that was the rule for boys. If it’s just a normal community pool than sure I’ll wear what I want. But another example is my dad taking me to get an EKG. I didn’t know anything about what to expect and the female nurse told me to take off my shirt to hook up the electrodes. If I didn’t want to cause a scene, I had no other choice to comply and I did not like it. And I agree it’s awful about how even nipples on little girls have been sexualized. But it seems primarily a…
/r/MensRights22/11/20 08:09 PM
1

But I also don’t view a simple showing of the female nipple as sexual. And that’s what the majority thinks
/r/MensRights21/11/20 07:29 PM
2

Yeah I had an ekg a couple years ago and I had no idea what to expect because my dad was the one who arrangement the appointment and the female nurse told me to take my shirt off so they could hook up the electrodes. I didn’t want to cause a scene so I complied but I did not like it!
/r/MensRights21/11/20 06:42 PM
-4

I agree with you. I personally didn’t care that Google didn’t have a drawing for IMD because it didn’t have an affect on my beliefs. When Google makes a women’s day doodle, I don’t care too. It might just be me having a nonchalant attitude about this though
/r/MensRights21/11/20 05:17 PM
-1

That might be a hard thing to do because you’re asking them in hindsight. Depending on their ideology, they might formulate their answer to align with the idea that a female cannot rape a male (so physical is worse than mental). Or if they say mental was worse, they could say it was specifically because of penetration. Like a tetanus shot vs a colonoscopy without sedation. Both hurt but the latter (without sedation) will hurt more and also is likely to give mental anguish (if any at all). But th…
/r/MensRights21/11/20 05:06 PM
1

But I did grow up having been taught that breastfeeding is sexual. I defied the odds.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 04:47 PM
1

I grew up in America believing that anything involving a female nipple is sexual. That includes breastfeeding. But I didn’t feel aroused.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 04:21 PM
2

I think they are defining rape as the victim being penetrated and the perpetrator being the penetrator. Because I think in most societies, penetration is viewed as more painful, therefore unwanted penetration is rape and females can’t rape males. I don’t know if this should be the definition of rape but society basically says “a vagina cannot physically hurt a penis but a penis can physically hurt a vagina”. I’m trying to figure out this topic myself so I just gave my observation and not a concl…
/r/MensRights21/11/20 02:26 PM
2

Thanks that comment, and that is definite true about the sports changing rooms, at least in America. So to me this is an issue about bodily privacy, even though 99.999% of guys don’t view this as an issue. Growing up I always felt uncomfortable being around girls because I was “more naked” than them while they had more bodily privacy.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 12:56 PM
2

I’ve only seen parts of it, but not full episodes. They were completely naked?
/r/MensRights21/11/20 12:53 PM
1

Well this was a swimming class and the rule was to not where any upper garment. If I’m in a regular pool then sure I’ll wear whatever I want. But let me exaggerate this to an absurd level. What if the rule was for a certain group to swim completely naked, and the other group to swim wearing a bathing suit. In my opinion, the group that has to swim naked is obviously the more oppressed because that is just so wrong. The group that has to swim with a bathing suit on isn’t oppressed but rather priv…
/r/MensRights21/11/20 12:46 PM
1

Village was in an outskirts of Calcutta while I was there donating certain items to an orphanage during a mission trip. But as a male that grew up in America, I theoretically should been aroused, because in America breastfeeding is seen as sexual by (I would argue) most heterosexual men. But I, instinctually, was not aroused.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 12:40 PM
1

Idk if I completely agree because I went to a rural village3 years ago to help out with an orphanage and I saw a woman breastfeeding and I didn’t get aroused/horny in the slightest. To me, when nipples are “scantly” covered, that artificially increases the “sexiness” of the nipple. If they’re not covered, I couldn’t care less about them.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 10:20 AM
5

And the sad fact is, it’s not only women, but MEN THEMSELVES who agree to and embellish this role! 🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights20/11/20 03:51 AM
2

Ok that clarifies things a bit more. I was thinking cops just randomly came up to you and hit you. But they themselves were probably white knights themselves. In any case, if you’re story is true then I hope you can overcome this
/r/MensRights19/11/20 04:28 PM
3

Yeah and the police showing up and hitting him first to seemed weird
/r/MensRights19/11/20 12:32 PM
7

I’ve mentioned this in another comment but it’s because women are viewed as having a “child-like” appearance. Generally speaking, men are not thought of having that “child-like” look. Therefore if a man is harassing a woman, it’s almost (not completely though) like they’re preying on children. If a woman is harassing a man, that’s viewed as comical because what damage can a child to do an adult? Society may not say this out loud but deep down this is the foundation for their logic.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 03:55 AM
2

Yes yes and again yes!
/r/MensRights18/11/20 01:03 AM
7

Thanks for that info
/r/MensRights17/11/20 08:23 PM
84

Huh, I was always taught that a woman getting breast cancer was more likely to die than a man getting prostate cancer. Guess they taught me wrong. Oh and also, men do have breasts and can get breast cancer, uncommon though. But I also don’t want this turn turn into victimhood competition
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:15 PM
1

I wrote in my comment that intact males have the ability to know what it’s like to be circumcised. All I have to do is retract my skin all the way and I have most of the experience of circumcision, without the actual cut of course. I got numb, irritation, masturbation did not feel pleasurable, etc. It’s impossible for someone who was cut as a baby to know what the alternative feels. Lasting longer in bed can be taught, you don’t have to get cut to do that. But at least you’re admitting there is …
/r/MensRights17/11/20 03:15 AM
5

You're going to say I'm wrong for calling you a liar but are you going to actually prove it?
/r/MensRights16/11/20 04:27 AM
5

Declawing cats has nothing to do with this. Once again you ignored the reason why I said that. I said it because you said "It would have been banned decades ago" if it had a bad effect. This is showing that logic does not work in real life. Things with bad effects are still taking place legally. One example is NOT definitive of a majority or the definitive factor. Other than some names there's no other info to back up that article. 2nd link: Again, ONE example. Slightly better in validity but st…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 04:25 AM
6

I disagree with what another comment said, it’s not simply a useless piece of skin. I am intact and I will attest that my frenulum attached to my foreskin, as well as the inner mucosa of the skin have made maturation so much more pleasurable. For intact males, they have the ability to experience circumcision by leaving the skin retracted and boy is it an awful, painful experience. But seriously, the males who were cut at birth don’t know what they don’t have, so I don’t have compassion on them w…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 02:36 AM
1

Well about the father being protective of his daughter, it’s likely because he feels that every male the same age as his daughter only desires one thing and that is sex. However we’re just talking about a kiss here, that’s a completely different category. The point is, a girl can easily enjoy a kiss from an older boy. Did you look up Jimin from BTS? Girls are lusting the hell out of him. Even Justin Bieber back in the day when he was a young adult. Just saying boys and girls are different doesn’…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 02:01 AM
1

Muscular men do indeed have sex appeal however it’s still on a lower level than the sex appeal of the ideal female image. If you take an attractive man and attractive woman, it’s going to almost only women who find the man sexy but for the woman, there will be almost all men and many women who view her as sexy. The general consensus on both genders is that the female sex appeal is greater than the male one.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 01:33 AM
1

What’s wrong about that? The answer is in the title of the post itself, it’s what if the genders were reversed. Lol. Do you have any idea how many preteen and teen girls lust after Kpop boy bands? Would it be okay if Jimin from BTS (a kpop boy band) kissed a 13 year old girl? Because I’ll tell you right now, there will be no shortage of girls who would dream of that happening to them. When I was 13, I was kind of confused. I thought I was bi at one point but the girls I did have a crush on were …
/r/MensRights16/11/20 01:30 AM
1

Wait is it only if she’s hot that makes it okay?
/r/MensRights16/11/20 12:41 AM
5

This shouldn’t be allowed. I, a man, know my strength has limitations and I would not seek a career that requires a level of physical requirements I cannot obtain. The same should be applied for women.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 11:58 PM
3

Mind you this is a wildly unpopular opinion. You know there’s a billion dollar industry down in Orlando that has a theme park that glorifies this whole princess crap. Millions of mothers AND fathers are not gonna like it. Those fathers say “a girl needs to find a man she that can take care of her! That’s what I’m going to teach my son, to take care of his his future wife and any other women in his life!”. Both the mother and father are complicit in this pathetic attitude that many girls have. I …
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:41 PM
2

It’s because the society generally deems that picture of that female is more “sexy” than that male picture. The lack of muscles, body hair, and having smooth skin makes somebody more sexy across both male and female. The man in that photo has muscles and does not have smooth hairless skin. The reason why I say this applies to both genders is because a man can easily look like a woman. If I go and shave my thighs, put on a wig, I can fool a lot of people into thinking I’m a woman. Especially if I…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:32 PM
6

I have answered your 'questions' you simply don't like the answer. Humanity is most often not as simple as yes or no. My question was not about humanity, my question was very specific and only requires a 'yes' or 'no', which you have failed to provide. Abortion is quite different than circumcision. Life vs a small bit of skin Once again, you are not deliberately ignoring the reason I brought up abortion. You said If it had any effect it would have been banned decades ago. I know abortion is diff…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:45 PM
6

My condemning anything isn't going to stop it nor is yours. If it had any effect it would have been banned decades ago. That will force those who support it to resort to less than 'ideal methods'. Please look at the reason why I am saying the things I am saying. The reason I said If you are not condemning the use of nonmedical infant circumcision is because you said No. Don't make assumptions. But I just proved that 'No' answer is false. And that is factually incorrect saying it would have been …
/r/MensRights15/11/20 06:22 AM
5

"You are saying they do not have a right to a foreskin. " - No. Don't make assumptions. It is better to get it done as a baby than as an adult. I posted the cons of doing it as an adult yet you and other seem fixated on 'right of the individual'. My inference is correct because it's either a yes or a no. If you are not condemning the use of nonmedical infant circumcision, how is that not a *no*? I am indeed focusing on the right of the individual because for my earlier question of "why can't you…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:56 AM
2

I see your point but I’ll have to disagree with the feminine and masculine attributes. I know you said expressing emotions and listening aren’t only female characteristics but I think it’s destructive to say that’s primarily a female trait. Whatever the studies say, that is sort of giving an excuse for men to act like jerks. If a man is not a good listener, he can just say “oh, women are better at it than men so what can I do?” I can attest in my life that at times my father was one of the kinde…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:31 AM
3

Interesting, had no idea about the MRI results
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:00 AM
27

She says that she wants her boys to stand up for women I know this will be unpopular but here it goes. I don’t think this is the right approach. This is just telling the boys “look, girls are so weak they need you to protect them”. But a smart boy might think “if they need us to save them, that means they can’t fight back against us”. All it takes it some rational thinking to come to this conclusion. The real way to protect women is to raise them up like the boys are. None of this princess crap.…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:59 AM
6

In points 1-3, you’re talking about risks associated with being circumcised as an adult rather than in infancy. And points 1-2 apply to infant circumcision as well (not every male will end up regretting it but many do and doctors can cut the skin too short). But in my previous comment, the next sentence after “right of the individual”, I said “they don’t know what the alternative feels like”. That is the whole point behind the question of “right of the individual to make a decision for themself”…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:44 AM
6

It looks like we'll just have to end up agreeing to disagree but I'll still write my reply. I know CollegeHumor isn't a valid scientific source but I prefaced that in the other comment. I just said that because you mentioned the women you know don't like uncircumcised penises. So I take it that you also have no right to force your belief that a female infant should not have any part of her vulva cut? Whether is be clitoris skin, labia, or (god forbid) the actual clitoris itself? Male babies heal…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 12:41 AM
7

But what if another culture decided that their beliefs should be pushed onto you and your kids? What if they saw the pinky toe as the the reason for demons in their religion to get into your body and wanted our country to change laws forcing you and your kids get it chopped off? Weird example but it stands. I’ll have to disagree and say that is an inaccurate comparison. I am advocating for preventing an action being taken. That’s not what is happening in the situation you described where some cu…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 09:57 PM
0

It depends on the mutilation. You might be angry to hear this but I don’t believe that cutting parts of the foreskin is worse than cutting the clitoris. That being said, I do not agree cutting off the clitoris is the same as cutting off the penis, or even the penis head. Because even though embryologically they had similar origins, at the end of the day, the penis is directly involved in 2 organ systems (excretory and reproductive) whereas the clitoris is not because there is no urethra passing …
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:03 PM
5

Just want to preface by saying my post is from the position of someone against infant circumcision. I got the impression from your comment that I was contemplating having it done to myself. That’s a definite no lol. In my view, the pros are over-exaggerated. The main pro being for health reasons. Technically that is true there is gross negligence of basic hygiene. But seriously, it is not that hard to clean your penis! It takes minimal effort. Why can’t a parent simply teach their son this basic…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 03:59 PM
1

What crime was he charged with? Was it sodomy? Whatever it was, is the punishment the same as if it were treated as a rape case?
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:33 AM
4

Ideally yes, I would love to just argue on a moral basis. However in reality, most people diminish that aspect. My brother is a nurse practitioner and during his clinicals, he participated in an infant circumcision. The mother was told by the males in her life that they did not suffer one bit from being circumcised, so that influenced her decision to proceed with it. Plus she also thought it "looked better", making it a cosmetic operation. [As a side note, when my brother told me that, my blood …
/r/MensRights14/11/20 04:59 AM
5

In the case of Sinaga, I think most people, men and women, agree this is extremely horrific. The problem is in most cases, male rape is viewed as quite comedic in contemporary culture. In school, there were plenty of jokes that if someone got arrested, they would facetiously say "don't drop the soap!". That kind of sentiment reflects a great lack of seriousness when it comes to this topic. But at least people take it seriously when it's a little boy, that's a good thing. However, Sinaga is a mal…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 04:34 AM
6

I would say yes to all 3 of those questions. But I guess my question was mainly geared toward specifically countering the males who profess that infant/child circumcision has had no negative effect on them whatsoever. If there's someone in the room who is neutral and the circumcision advocate is trying to convince the neutral person, what's a good way to counteract their point? The mutilation proponent would answer no to your 1st question, probably no to your 2nd, and a tossup to the 3rd questio…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 04:03 AM
1

I agree, life of a male in impoverished countries is much worse than in the USA. That’s why my unrealistic scenario was about placing an attractive woman in a random situation in America and do the same for an attractive man. I believe the reason I gave above is true about the aggressiveness each would face. I brought up the rate of male genital mutilation is higher than female mutilation in those countries and recognized the males get raped. I wasn’t saying those men are living lives of luxury,…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 03:48 AM
3

If someone is not circumcised, they have the ability to emulate what it is like to be circumcised. No, it will not be 100% exactly the same but in a practical sense, the experience is similar in the short run. All you have to do is retract the foreskin all the way. I did so, tried masturbating for several minutes, barely got any pleasure from that and could not finish it. The skin couldn’t just glide as it does when it’s fully retracted (ie like not having a foreskin). I’m sure if I kept at it f…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 03:39 AM
0

Like other comments have already mentioned, it will definitely depend on the country/area of the world. For example, life as a woman in sub Saharan Africa or Afghanistan is going to be much worse than a woman in the Netherlands or USA for many reasons. But let’s just take the USA for example. It’s true it depends on the situation but I would say if you take an attractive woman and put her in a random place, the woman may have a have a harder time simply because there are a higher number of aggre…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:28 PM
2

It’s because it all boils down to the prevailing thought that a female cannot physically penetrate a male therefore it’s completely harmless whatever she does to a male, REGARDLESS of his age. I know that’s not what most people think on the surface when they watch this video but if you question them far enough, it’ll eventually reach that point. Taking this example, someone will say “Oh com’on, what’s the worst that can happen to that boy? He had a blast!”. Now reverse the genders. “What’s’ the …
/r/MensRights13/11/20 03:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter