| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | My son's mother now wants my son to be circumcised. I don't. We have joint custody. Anyone have experience with this matter?That would only be before the foreskin is retractable. In infants, before the glans and foreskin separate, rolling down the foreskin can cause damage. Over time it eventually becomes retractable. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/11 10:25 PM |
| 8 | My son's mother now wants my son to be circumcised. I don't. We have joint custody. Anyone have experience with this matter?I've been thinking about this recently. It is often claimed that parents have "the right" to circumcise their child. As their child is their legal responsibility, surely they have this 'right' up until their child reaches adulthood or similar? It would make sense that parents would be legally allowed to do this to their child a week before they're 18 just as much as they could a week after they are born. However, having spoken briefly to a medical doctor, apparently: More tricky later on as you … | /r/MensRights | 28/12/11 10:21 PM |
| 1 | sometimes it turns out that the circumcision of the baby is actually all about and only about the feelings of the mommy, nobody cares about the baby's feelings'Experts'? Oh yes, of course they all agree with your point of view. By the by, did you know that we can find 'experts' who don't think female circumcision is all that bad? Fancy that! Who'd have thought it! Again I'll simply reference the majority of the rest of the world who say "Wtf?" at you and yours. Feel free to justify it to yourself all you want. The fact remains that you're advocating cutting off healthy portions of tissue from infants' genitalia for no good reason what so ever. And I h… | /r/MensRights | 25/12/11 01:13 AM |
| 1 | sometimes it turns out that the circumcision of the baby is actually all about and only about the feelings of the mommy, nobody cares about the baby's feelingsStrange how you figure that, seeing as it seems the majority of US males have had part of their penis removed. However, it does give an indication as to your motivation behind being in favour of circumcision. Mind you, it's not that difficult work out why most men, who have gone through the procedure, are often quite stalwart in their position. If you haven't already, you really need to understand that this issue isn't about you and your genitals. It's about all the baby boys that will be subjec… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/11 06:22 AM |
| 2 | sometimes it turns out that the circumcision of the baby is actually all about and only about the feelings of the mommy, nobody cares about the baby's feelingsWith no external input whatsoever. Which would mean they don't circumcise their son because they'll have never heard of it in the first place! Or - a caring family member could ensure they consider the potential pain and harm they might do to their newborn by giving them a perspective they might not have considered before. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/11 04:07 AM |
| 3 | sometimes it turns out that the circumcision of the baby is actually all about and only about the feelings of the mommy, nobody cares about the baby's feelingsHow to spot an American in one easy step: Militant opposition to circumcision is a position that's in the minority. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/11 04:04 AM |
| 2 | Site encourages women to take pictures of men on London underground without their knowledge, then upload them so their appearance and clothes can be rated and bitched on - but men taking photos of women is not allowed as 'it feels different'.If you/they are referring to the show I think you are, then yes. Though I particularly enjoy being shown how shallow some people are. "Anthea, you turned out your 'Yes' light as soon as you saw Dave. Why?" "I don't like the colour of his trousers." It's entertainment, I suppose. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 12:23 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision.. Female Equivalence..Why is it so difficult for some ladies to put themselves in our shoes?Second, female circumcision is a removal of a significant part of a woman's sexual pleasure center. removal of the clit is a very dramatic change in sensation for a woman. Not all female circumcision is removal of clitoris, sewing up of vagina etc. There are a number of different types, the same as there are a number of different types of male circumcision. Also - your explanation of sexual pleasure is pretty much wrong, I'm afraid, though you're arguing from the point of clitoris removal, I thi… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/11 06:17 PM |
| 2 | Circumcision.. Female Equivalence..Why is it so difficult for some ladies to put themselves in our shoes?Also it completely fails to consider the fact that babies do not have sex. Young and older men have sex - why not wait until a man is old enough to decide? | /r/MensRights | 06/07/11 06:01 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter