TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wifesabitch Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by wifesabitch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Wow. Seriously, why can't you answer the question? Lol If you asked me why I think it's ok. No bullshit from me. I'll give a simple, direct answer. It's not hard. Guess I'll assume you don't have an argument. Not going to bother asking for a 4th time.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 02:17 PM
-1

Why are you avoiding the question? It should be very easy to answer, few sentences, tops. For a 3rd time...Why do you think it's wrong to remove it?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 02:55 AM
1

No, don't cop out now. Why do you think it's wrong to remove it?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 02:16 AM
1

There is a difference. The difference is that the foreskin is a sexually sensitive part of the body. How do I know that's true? I have one. So, you are making making the argument that it's ok to take that away from a man for highly dubious benefits, none of which hold up to statistics, unlike vaccines. You aren't following the conversation. Why do you think it's wrong to remove it?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 01:32 AM
0

Vaccines don't involve surgery or removal of a body part. Oh my God. I'm going to have to assume you're trolling at this point. I just can't believe this is going over your head this much. It isn't natural. You're the one appealing to what's natural. Stick to it or you're contradicting yourself. It's that simple. You can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:58 AM
0

None of your examples involve healthy, normal body parts. They all involve birth defects or abnormalities. You're comparing apples to oranges. It's not apples to oranges, you just don't like your logic being exposed as flawed. You want to appeal to what's "natural" but also want to conveniently forget that and approve of injecting them with vaccines which is unnatural. It's "their body" only when you want it to be. You can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 11:51 PM
-1

This is the only time your decision determines how much of their body they get to keep. No. I've given you several examples, but just choose to ignore it because it doesn't suit your argument. You're repeating you opinion like a broken record. I get it, that's what you think, that's cool. You do what you want with your kid.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 08:42 PM
-1

The health benefits are minuscule at best and can all be attained in much less invasive ways. The cosmetic "benefits" are completely subjective. Some prefer cut, some prefer intact. The problem is that you don't seem to care what your son wants, you want to reconstruct his penis in a way that is pleasing to you, which is rather disturbing. It's called parenting, you make thousands decisions for them. You really don't get it. This is actually very minor compared to the majority of decisions you m…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 07:08 PM
1

Well, a baby can't tell you that he's in pain. They don't use words, but I'm pretty sure they cry when they are in pain and they aren't holding it in. I could show you examples of people who regretted cutting their sons after seeing how it affected them. Cool. I'm sure you could. I could show you examples of parents who are happy with the procedure.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:20 PM
-1

At least I'm not amputating the most sensitive parts of my children's genitalia. That's your right as a parent, hopefully your child grows up happy and healthy. I prefer my kid takes advantage of the health and cosmetic benefits the simple procedure offers. To each his own! Here's the link They don't recommend against it. Did you even read your source? Lol
/r/MensRights27/03/18 11:57 AM
-1

I'm not okay with removing an extra toe on someone's body, but I think it's a lot less problematic than amputating a normal body part. Vaccines don't remove body parts. Geez, you're just not following at all. Most younger Canadians are intact, and Canada's national medical association recommends against infant circumcision. Recommend against? Have a link for that? I can't seem to find it.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:46 AM
-1

Once again, there's a huge difference between vaccines and amputating part of the genitals. You're not following. You're okay with removing an extra toe on someone else's body, because it's not natural. However, natural parts have to stay. You're okay with injecting a vaccine into someone else's body which isn't natural. You're contradicting your own views. Where are you from? Ontario, Canada
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:52 AM
0

dried out, desensitized penis with diminished feeling and function and an ugly scar is somehow superior to a normal penis. If that was the result of a circumcision that would be awful. Good thing that is completely inaccurate. The ethical anti-circumcision argument is already fairly solid, you don't need to make up bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:32 AM
0

Because that's what circumcision is. The removal of healthy, normal, erogenous tissue from someone who can't consent. Once again, a birthmark is a deformity, and not equivalent to a natural foreskin. Now its okay to make irreversible changes to a child's body as long as it's not "natural". "It's not your body" doesn't apply in that scenario somehow. Gotcha. If what's natural is what's important, you should be anti-vaccine. That's certainly not natural. Most women aren't repulsed by the foreskin.…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:01 AM
-1

...except of course it's not an "option" for them is it, because the infant girls would have no say in their genital mutilation? You mean it's an "option" for their parents LOL. Exactly. Not really sure why you needed to point out the obvious. Still, nice to see that you agree that sexually abusing & mutilating infant girls is cool. Sexually absuing? What? You know you are bad at debating when you have to resort to making up complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 02:41 AM
0

It's disturbing that one of your main reasons for cutting skin off the genitals of an infant just so they might have a better sex life with women. You get disturbed easily. I want to make my child happy, this will help with that. What about situations in which the infant grows up with no sexual interest in women? What about them? That reason goes completely out the window and you're left with the very very marginal medical benefits (if any) and that's supposed to justify taking a knife to an inf…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 02:30 AM
-1

No, it isn't. Removing a healthy, normal part of a child's body without their consent is wrong. Why is "removing" the key to you? If they had a birthmark on thier face, a simple procedure with little risk could remove it, I take it you'd be against it. It's their body, they can decide when they are an adult. You're the parent, you can make that decision. Fine by me. Is female circumcision acceptable to you? I am uninformed when it comes to female circumcision but if it is the same thing as a mal…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 02:18 AM
1

Cutting part of your son's genitals off, potentially causing long term harm to his sex life because you think some women prefer it that way is a failed justification. Sure, good thing that's not my justification. You think your son will be so desperate that he can only get ignorant and shallow women? How can any sane man rationalize that? Ignorant and shallow woman? Lol Do you know what the word ignorant means? And they like what they like. Physical attraction is a pretty big thing in relationsh…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:55 AM
-6

A sixth toe is an abnormality. A foreskin is not. Completely irrelevant. You just don't like those hypotheticals because it shows my line of thinking is completely acceptable. Why should the cosmetic preferences of some women dictate how much of his penis he gets to keep? It doesn't. Because not all women prefer cut, even in America, and the vast majority of European, Canadian, and Aussie women prefer intact. LOL, sure they do. Keep telling yourself that.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:22 AM
-2

What other decisions involve removing part of his body? If he was born with a sixth toe, he could lead a perfectly normal life if I just leave it alone. I have the option with a simple procedure to remove that toe, I would do so. There, that would be a decision involving removing a part of his body. Why do you think removing a lot of sensitive, erogenous tissue would improve his sex life? I said this several times already. Women don't like it. There are women that won't fuck/blow a guy that isn'…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:03 AM
-5

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion on this, which is why carving your opinion into your son is problematic. Problematic to you. I understand parenting involving making thousands of decisions for my child. I'm going to "carve" out many more of them into him as he grows up. Exactly. It should be an option given to them when their adults capable of deciding what they want for their bodies. The same applies to circumcision. Alright, cool, I know, that's your opinion. I don't have the same one…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:41 AM
1

I'll go with the small sample size of my nephew and my son. They didn't display signs of pain afterwards. They were going about their life of pissing, shitting, sleeping and eating as usual. As for older people, as I said with a personal example of the 5 year old that couldn't even wear pants for a month because it hurt so much, but let's say that's rare. Adults at the very at least have mild to moderate pain and usually take a week off work afterwards. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/232765…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 10:16 PM
-12

My opinion is that it's unacceptable to chop of a healthy, normal, part of someone else. Cutting out men's nipples would reduce their breast cancer risk, yet we don't do it to baby boys. Ask yourself why. The medical benefits of circumcision are negligible at best, ergo you can't justify doing it to babies and children. Cool, that's your opinion. I'm not saying is an obvious choice. I could go either way on it. Circumcised doesn't look better, it's no safer, a foreskin takes 5 seconds to clean i…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 09:20 PM
1

No, of course not. They aren't in pain during recovery like they would be when they are older.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 08:34 PM
1

The babies aren't in pain, that's the point. Lol It's hilarious everyone piping up here about this procedure that they don't seem to have any clue about.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 08:22 PM
0

Dosing with painkillers for a month sounds horrible. So you see recovery is much worse. Thanks for making my point. Lol
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:33 PM
-5

The difference is that a vaccine doesn't remove any body parts, and has very real medical benefits. Whereas circumcision removes healthy, erogenous tissue, for health benefits that are incredibly minuscule at best. Vaccines are more important and have more benefits, sure. The two things aren't exactly the same but they don't have to be. People here are still contradicting themselves with "it thier body they should decide" comments. If there were medical benefits, a near 100% they'd approve and t…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:23 PM
1

Ok. Are you implying recovery for a grown man is as easy as it is for a 1 month old?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 04:46 PM
0

If this is the case, then why do people on your side of the discussion make the ridiculous argument that it's "better" to do it to babies, because "it will hurt more later" - as though a grown man can withstand less pain than a baby It's only a ridiculous argument to you because you don't understand it. They aren't saying because of the pain involved with the actual procedure. Recovery is way worse. My brother-in-law, had to have it done at five years old, he couldn't wear pants for a month afte…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:14 PM
-3

It's not your penis, why not let the person whose penis it is decide when he's old enough? You can use that exact argument to not give a vaccine. "it's not your body" As a parent you make decisions in the best interests of your child. Some decisions are clear cut and easy, some are harder. This is definitely a tricky one. And you don't see amputation of part of the genitalia as a downside? Obviously I don't. I had that "amputation" performed on me, and I'm glad my parents did it. Asked several o…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 11:46 AM
1

Lol You're the one who said "bloody murder from the damage that's being done" Newborns screen bloody murder sometimes when they have a wet diaper or are hungry. A baby crying doesn't mean they are in pain. Research didn't say that?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 01:40 AM
1

What are you talking about? The area is numb, they don't feel a thing. My boy had zero clue what was going on and didn't make a peep. I watched it. No need to comment on something you have no clue about
/r/MensRights25/03/18 10:10 PM
-1

Ok, it's piece of skin, people here are acting like it's removing an arm. It's meaningless. Pain? The argument is shit too, guess what? They freeze it. Do you people not even know what the procedure is? The needle is the only painful part, same amount of pain as when they get their shots. We could pass studies back and forth all day. I'm not claiming huge medical benefits. There are several minor ones, enough to make it worth it. Comparing circumcision to a vaccine is just plain incorrect. There…
/r/MensRights25/03/18 08:37 PM
-2

I see the opposite, very minimal downside and a few decent benefits.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:12 PM
-8

I didn't, just had the forskin removed.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:26 PM
1

Needle to numb his penis. They don't just cut it off without freezing the area first
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:59 PM
-1

Haha, I did a few weeks ago actually. He didn't like when the needle went in, after that, it was nothing. I've seen him in more pain when he has gas. Nice try
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:13 PM
-4

You are also aware that, in spite of their position being that there are notable health benefits, they believe that the benefits are not strong enough to recommend circumcision as a general practice, yes? Of course. I'm fully aware it's not going to give you huge health benefits, it's fairly minimal. People here like to conveniently ignore that there are benefits. Up to the parents to do some parenting to weigh the pro and cons of the procedure. Please get back to me when you can show that getti…
/r/MensRights25/03/18 02:51 PM
-1

Lol, no, no it doesn't.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 02:14 PM
0

Geez, this sub is great but gets pretty stupid on this topic for some reason. You really think that's a good source? C'mon now
/r/MensRights25/03/18 02:02 PM
-2

It's a pretty good comparison, they're both painful cosmetic surgeries that serve no real medical function. Circumcision isn't any more painful than a vaccine, are you against vaccines? And there are medical benefits: https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/pages/newborn-male-circumcision.aspx There are other issues with that comparison but it's doesn't really matter as it's already proved to be a shitty one.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 01:39 PM
-6

Ok, and? What is the point in that comment? That's not supposed to be a good comparison is it?
/r/MensRights25/03/18 01:22 PM
-24

You're not really making a point there.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 12:57 PM
-7

Source?
/r/MensRights25/03/18 12:47 PM
-22

Vaccines have clear, verifiable medical benefit and no real provable downsides, at least for the vaccines that are administered to infants. Circumcision has no statistically significant medical benefits, is painful and traumatising, and is effectively only done for religious or cultural reasons. Nice try, but circumcision does have benefits: https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/pages/newborn-male-circumcision.aspx And it's a needle for a vaccines is painful and traumatizing as …
/r/MensRights25/03/18 12:36 PM
-84

That's fine, as long as you recognize that a lot of people this is done to vehemently dislike it Do you have a source for that? It's their penis, let them make their own choice. It's called parenting. Thousands of decisions are made for your child. Are you against vaccines too? It's their body, let them make thier own choice.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter