TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wild-tangent Archive

View 1 posts and 55 comments by wild-tangent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

She’s read “I don’t like raising someone else’s kids-“ and puts forward ‘well maybe if I give him one too...’ Fuck, smart move is to put it up for adoption. Still isn’t perfect as a solution/as good as not having had someone else’s kids in the first place but it’s a damn sight better off than where she is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/11/18 02:27 AM
1

As a former Democrat, they'll slander you on your way to and from the polls. They might take your vote, but expect no gratitude.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/18 02:59 PM
2

If it goes like the others, she’ll come home in the middle of the night, crawl into bed beside me, and tell me all about how she and Paulo had sex. I won’t explode with anger or seethe with resentment. I’ll tell her it’s a hot story and I’m glad she had fun. It’s hot because she’s excited, and I’m glad because I’m a feminist. And this is why I'm not a feminist.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/09/18 05:22 AM
2

I don't, have you seen her?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/09/18 05:19 AM
1

Politics is downstream of culture- but culture is downstream of economics. I think that a good economy will be the beginning of a fix for a cultural rot.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/09/18 05:19 AM
4

Rigged?
/r/MensRights24/11/17 05:50 AM
2

Weird. I'm often frustrated with the establishment GOP, but mostly because they seem to think 'sort it out yourself' is an acceptable form of governance. Then, when someone does get upset at the pollution in their river and takes a gun and shoots some suit, they get bent out of shape abouti t.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 02:35 AM
4

I absolutely agree that it should be easier for men to walk away from a child they didn't want, Like I said, there's a lot of common ground for people, where we each agree that it's reasonable, but the ideologies tend to end up being at a loggerheads. You'll never get NOW or FMLA to back that opinion. I think those are all very reasonable and sensible caveats that can prevent it from being exploited or unfair to the mother. Feminist organizations in my state have been fighting to change those la…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:05 AM
1

No worries
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:32 PM
1

Ping
/r/MensRights17/10/17 09:35 PM
5

It's alright. My time zone is pretty different than yours- I just moved to Australia of all places, so I'm actually headed to bed, then I have a pretty big day tomorrow "morning" but I do promise to try and keep on top of it. While I am not really much of a member of this community (popped in for the first time in a long, long time), I am glad to hear everyone's playing nice. I do think that the philosophies are diametrically opposed, but the people who believe them are certain to find much comm…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:22 PM
12

Hey, I wanted to say thank you for doing this. It's way easier to rest in an ivory tower and pretend everything's fine, after all. I have worked in politics and related fields for years and have learned that there is truth and value in pretty much any perspective. Same here. I would like to know what my side of the spectrum can do to help your side feel less ostracized by mine. Stop making any social issue about the women that are affected while also ignoring the living shit out of the boys. Rem…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:00 PM
-1

PAO, right in the kisser!
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 04:36 PM
1

Do not, absolutely, do fucking not friend and then interact with the girl you're fucking/want to fuck. Let them friend you, then ignore them. This is a showcase of your life, a highlight reel. The moment you give them attention/validation, you've given them what you want, and they have no further use for you. Text. Call. State what you want, and don't use weasel words or start sentences as such. Be definitive, clear, assertive. Don't ask questions or leave decisions in her hands, she doesn't lik…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/16 05:56 AM
1

The smart is to sell everything and book it to a foreign country.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:50 PM
5

It happens. Okcupid is another thing. How many girl profiles are there that say ""don't just say hi," or "how are you doing" or "what's up,"" But most unsolicited messages I get in my inbox (about 2-3 a week in a pretty low populated area) are exactly that. It's hypocrisy, but it's not like society's giving out the pass on this one; I don't think it's much of a "pussypass."
/r/PussyPass31/10/14 03:49 PM
10

An interesting viewpoint, but I wouldn't call it "pussy pass."
/r/PussyPass31/10/14 03:20 PM
1

Alum here of UDel here, late to the party. This was 6 years ago, and was harshly criticized. I was part of the class of students who went through it, but I myself was a transfer student midway through the year it was done, so I "missed it." It was dropped immediately, and many of the staff were fired over the "mishandling." (Read: righteous parental outrage). Just clearing that up- this was a long time ago, and we're not all some bunch of nutbags, and it was openly (and righteously) mocked and d…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 08:19 PM
1

I think it's both good and bad. They say they stand for good/shutting down privilege. But on the other hand, I feel that their goal is to shout down opinions that run contrary to their own, to bury them so nobody can see those opinions. Similar to Online Persona Management that was a major scandal with HBGary a couple years ago, SRS aims to shut down opinions that are not in line with their own, hiding them from easy view (most people don't scroll past four or five responses to a thread) that th…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:06 PM
1

I've actually pitched the same question over at a feminist subreddit. I'm going to then switch around the question a bit, and ask them when THEY think their job will be done. Sadly, it's been answered (ad nauseum) to the point that they've got multiple sidebar'd threads. Then I'm going to compose a big x-post.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:51 AM
1

Hey, everyone, look, Godwin's law! Thus far, in this thread, we've called people who believe in feminism: Marxist, Mongol, and now Nazi. This reminds me a bit of the Tea Party talking about Obama. Seriously, let's cut down on the comparisons to past regimes.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:08 PM
0

As recognizably "men?" As their male gender role? As a "person"? Or as a government decides that women are less likely to commit violent crimes, that men should be kept for breeding only, and otherwise men should be put to death? (A la "SCUM Manifesto")?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:04 PM
0

So... like Christianity and Christians? Islam and Islamists? Atheism and (angry) Secular Humanists?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:00 PM
1

So...in fifty years, then? Your estimate.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 04:56 PM
1

I WILL get downvoted for this; seddit/PUAs are the most circle-jerky communities I know of, and this runs completely the opposite, but here's why some people don't like PUA's: In my experience, and from the PUA's I've had the misfortune to have met, I've got to say that by and large, they're jerks. The ultimate goal of many PUA's is to get pussy; the woman is completely secondary. You can argue that you're making her feel good. You can argue that that's "alpha," but I like to think it's self-cen…
/r/seduction05/10/12 04:03 PM
1

Go out and run in it anyways. Have someone take pictures a la the Bostonian woman marathon runner.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:24 PM
2

Er, you can be your own person but also be someone else's. Just as I'm someone's boyfriend. Just as that someone is my girlfriend. A bond can be defined as that. Eh, to each their own. I can certainly agree to disagree, but I think that if it brings down medical and insurance costs (and it very well may) then we'd be on the wrong side of the issue. We may be better off pushing other issues and initiatives from a strategy standpoint, but again, as someone who supports it, my view is not unbiased,…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:15 AM
3

True, but we must also remember that these aren't just "women." They're our women. Our mothers, our daughters, our sisters, our aunts, wives, and girlfriends. Face it, what we pay in taxes goes to them, too. Remember: taxes don't go to the people who pay them, or there wouldn't have to be a program for it. That's the first rule of taxation. They go to things nobody can or will pay for. Things like lighthouses, roads, railways, healthcare, registration, war, etc., to protect our interests when we…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:20 AM
2

than there should be appropriations to research better screening methods, not refraining from using the ones we have. In this, I completely agree. However, I'm simply saying that just because something benefits mostly women doesn't mean that it's misandrist in intent. We can't get carried away and state that anything that's just for one gender is anti-the other gender. And just as we can and should demand that men get appropriations in the bill, we can't demand that that it be lessened for women…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:36 AM
2

I hate to say it, but the man may be right. There's been some doubt cast as to the efficacy of a prostate exam. I'm not saying don't get tested. But if there's any doubt at all as to the efficacy of a procedure, most insurance companies will flat-out refuse to cover it. I hope they are effective and there's something wrong with the study. Prostate cancer is no joke, and any (voluntary) effective screening method to save lives, no matter how invasive, is a good thing in my book. I realize full we…
/r/MensRights28/06/12 10:23 PM
9

I'd like to say that these are often covered under private insurance anyways, and that birth control and mammograms are much cheaper to have on insurance than, say, the cost of an abortion, the cost of treating cancer late, etc., So I mean, look at these as preventative. For every dollar you sink into preventative care programs, you get back a bunch more. By making it co-pay free, you ensure that screenings are done more often, rather than skipping one to try and make ends meet, further helping …
/r/MensRights28/06/12 06:36 PM
12

That's a fair point in that that's another way he could sabotage her BC. It's a violation of an understood contract in order to achieve her own personal wants, however.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 06:29 PM
1

That's one of the few things that really offended me when I went to a very feminist college. I'm not really a mensrights guy, but I got linked to this and... yeah, I remember seeing that freshman year. It's really not cool.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 05:31 AM
4

Because a raging homeless person doesn't hold lectures charging $70 a pop, and can't attract an audience past "oh my god, what the fuck am I watching?"
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:04 PM
1

I think you did. The best thing you could have written back was either nothing at all, or to have said "of course, sweetie, what's wrong?"
/r/MensRights02/11/11 12:28 AM
2

Fuck that, I want to play video games in my nursing home. OLD PEOPLE LAN PARTY!!!!
/r/MensRights06/07/11 06:07 PM
1

It isn't necessarily dressing up, you're right. That would be ineffective to show up in a loose fit turtleneck/burqa equivalent as far as provocative nature of clothing. But what would be effective would be to not go off to a party where you know no one and get shitfaced because you're handed drinks from people you don't know. That's not where all cases of rape come from, but in a college town such as where I live, that's where the very vast majority of rapes occur (insofar as far as I know.)
/r/MensRights10/06/11 04:41 PM
3

to be fair, a pic of just vaginal lips isn't that erotic, either.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 05:56 PM
3

I dunno, I've had better luck with really girls towards the hotter end of the spectrum than ones who were totally inexperienced.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 01:35 AM
3

it's because they are terrified. They think that without feminism they would be back in the kitchen with no way out, no job, no life, no say in childbearing (at all) and a lot of other things. Denying one aspect of it makes them absolutely freak out that it's the start of a slippery slope backwards. To be fair, they're wrong. Most couples are happy to have two incomes in a house, and are okay with access to birth control and abortion. But this having been said, there are certain laws that do nee…
/r/MensRights13/05/11 03:26 AM
1

Lolwut?
/r/MensRights09/05/11 06:58 AM
1

No, was an alcoholic, before quitting. As someone with an alcoholic father, quitting alcoholism successfully is very impressive to me. He also pays his child support. He is involved with raising his children, letting them attend the wedding and getting custody. Sounds to me that he is very responsible.
/r/seduction15/04/11 07:52 PM
1

Uh, he never married her. Plus, he never sought treatment for it until it was a medical condition, whereupon he stopped. That's like most alcoholics, only he had the wherewithal to actually stop drinking.
/r/seduction15/04/11 07:00 PM
2

I Disagree, but am upvoting for diversity of opinion. I still disagree, though, for these reasons: she says she was unable to make him happy. She says the new girl is not a gold digger, who seems to actually like the guy. He is in a healthy, new relationship, where he has stayed faithful, married, and pays child support to the point that she (The ex) doesn't even have to even work. Honestly, it sounds like she just doesn't like how easy it was for these two to fall in love with one another.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 06:56 PM
1

Best term I heard for hovering parents was "helicopter parents" ready to swoop in at a moment's notice, yet always whining as they did so.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 11:12 PM
1

"Dudes" tune out because it's easier than correcting an entire room. You can say something, but it's your funeral. You realize that it's her taking your kids, and you just shrug, because you don't plan to have kids, and figure "well I won't marry anyone here." Guys are all too used to being told they aren't responsible enough for one thing or another. It's easier to just humor these people, short term. It is going to be a rude awakening when these women get into their thirties to find that men h…
/r/MensRights28/03/11 11:03 PM
1

I think that it came from the idea of men originally showing how the justice system can be incredibly biased towards women, but it came to be misunderstood and misapplied to just cases that involved women in general.
/r/MensRights26/02/11 12:25 AM
1

Most people aren't like this. But when you break up, sometimes things get ugly.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:27 PM
0

Simple- I get along with most of them fairly well, and sometimes have good conversations, and I enjoy making them moan by giving them massages, but I have flatly turned down offers of dates, going out to the bars, and refuse to have sex, because god knows what sort of trouble they can get me in (legally).
/r/MensRights15/02/11 04:17 PM
9

I second this idea. Seriously, I really hate to say it, but you cannot get ahead in this case. You have to leave the country, stop making the payments. You may love your daughter, but it's clear that almost none of it is reaching her.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 04:15 PM
1

Well, I think that they should have to serve the same sentence as far as prison, and I believe it more than fitting that false rape claims should be treated as a sex crime, putting them on the sex offender registry. This way men know not to go anywhere near her, as i they ever get alone with her, who knows what she'll make up about what happened in that time span?
/r/MensRights31/01/11 05:38 PM
2

I hate to say it, but UD does have a point here for one reason: the class makeup is at least 60% women, therefore it wouldn't make much sense to lock in the percentage at 50%, instead it is designed to more represent the class gender makeup, I.E. being closer to the 46% listed. I see what they're trying to do, but I do disagree with the idea of locked in percentages and prefer a lassiez faire approach, but that's just me.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 01:55 AM
2

That doesn't make our/her point any less correct, and she has worded it in a way that doesn't really offend anyone's beliefs. Her references to "the system" are interesting, but well made. "The System" is comprised of both men and women, and both men and women are capable of holding and supporting beliefs that can hurt others, unintentionally, whether it is misandry or misogyny. Just because on is in vogue makes it "the system" and one can comment on it without commenting on the very people perp…
/r/MensRights29/01/11 01:43 AM
3

Right here. I've been stalked, had someone try repeatedly to get themselves to be my girlfriend- basically walk around and say "oh, he's my boyfriend." I'd talk to them several times about it, but they'd keep at it, making things really uncomfortable. I've had women pick fights with me because "you're a man, you can't hit back" so they kept hitting me. I eventually got tired of it, especially when she picked up a glass to shatter over my head from the bar, and I just pushed her with one arm, sen…
/r/MensRights30/12/10 10:10 PM
1

Agree with the first half of male sexuality and liberation, but then I feel he misses the point completely. No, I just think that we need to make it so that we aren't afraid to let women say that a man is attractive- the sexualization of men is long overdue. Let a woman be allowed to say that she picked a man for something OTHER than how much money he makes- and the problem should go away.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 12:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter