TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wiley321 Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by wiley321 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Lol, check my comment and post history. I call it like I see it.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 11:00 PM
0

I know, and don't agree with that.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 10:15 PM
2

I never said it wasnt. What part of my explanation was biologically false?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 09:20 PM
2

Ok, are you saying you should have the right to compel a woman to get an abortion or bear a child to term against their wishes? Are you saying a child, once born, no longer had a father if the father "chooses"?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 09:16 PM
1

Yes, it can. Before it is a child, it is a fetus incapable of growing without its mother. During that time period, a woman gets sole decision making over HER body.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 09:01 PM
2

In what way would you apply that to a woman without being pro-life?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:57 PM
3

I hear you, but disagree. Yes, there is an unequal decision tree. A man gets only 1 choice, to have sex or not, and a woman gets several months to reverse the decision. That isn't fair. Both parties should recognize the risk of pregnancy before sex. A woman gets a second and third chance to back out. That is the natural imbalance, as you pointed out.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:56 PM
-1

I wouldn't agree with that law.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:52 PM
-2

Termination of a fetus that is completely reliant on the mother is a permissible option. Terminating a 33 week child is not (unless there is dire threat to the mother).
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:45 PM
-2

Men can engage in sex for whatever they want, but it is not without consequences. I see the position of equality. It isnt fair that woman have ALL of the power in deciding the fate of a fetus. My issue is that there is no moral path that would allow a man to compel a woman to determine the fate of their body. Itnis remarkably unfair, but their is no alternative that is more right.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:43 PM
3

Because it has 2 biological parents who share responsibility?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:30 PM
-5

Why should a woman who engages in consensual sex with a man bear the entire financial burden? If he decided he doesn't want the child, should he always be absolved of responsibility?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:29 PM
5

Sure. That would solve the problem. However, in the real world, a pregnant woman should have the choice to keep or abort a parasitic fetus. I do not believe a man should have the right to compel a woman to do either, and once the child is born, it will have 2 biological parents who share responsibility.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:28 PM
1

Financial abortion is not a real philosophical debate though. Sex is not consequence free for a man. He may not compel a woman to abort or keep a child. Once born, the child is the shared responsibility of both parents.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:26 PM
-4

For the same reason why a person who drinks and drives is responsible for the resulting deaths. Drinking doesn't absolve a person of responsibility. Thank you for your civility. I am not a troll here. I really appreciate this community, I just didnt agree with the direction of the OP.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:25 PM
0

The fetus' life will be determined by the woman. Having consensual sex with a woman comes with tacit understanding that bearing the child to birth will be their decision. As a man, you must be prepared to support a child or else dont have sex. It is not a "fair" arrangement.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:18 PM
-8

Yes to 1 and no to 2 and 3. If a woman rapes a man or gets pregnant due to lies/ false pretenses, I do not believe he should be liable for the consequences of a crime against him.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:11 PM
0

The woman will have greater agency in the birth of a child. Is that a controversial statement? There is no 50/50 in this debate.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:05 PM
-28

Is this the consensus of this sub? Really a dumb take by and large. The best interest, the fairness, needs to be directed at the well being of the child. Of course a man cannot tell a woman to abort or keep a child. If they dont want a child with a woman, there are clear ways to prevent it. I support equality, but this is a really toxic take. Edit: There have been many interesting disagreements with me, thank you for the discussion. I have probably addressed most of your questions in this commen…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 07:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter