TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wing_dingus_ Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by wing_dingus_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

it IS a bit difficult to comprehend when you edit nearly the entirety of your comment.. maybe it would be a different conversation in arenas unlike dating. the general consensus around here seems to be that dating preferences, in particular, are subject to the free law of the land. if that’s the case, i think you’re just ascribing different morality to colorist and heightist preferences based on guesswork
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 02:36 AM
0

HA. that may be the silliest thing i’ve read all day. short people are just ~entitled~ or ~inflating their SMV~??? i could just as easily say the same thing about dark-skinned individuals who feel ostracized in dating spaces. you grasp at every straw to try to make skin tone preferences “racist” but do absolutely nothing to suggest height preferences may stem from heightism. they’re no morally different - preferring or not preferring to date someone specifically on the basis of immutable charact…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 02:05 AM
1

convenient? it’s exactly that, i enjoy sharing pants with my girlfriend. seems far more sensible than actively preferring someone who ISN’T your height. and yes, if my peers were as particular as women about dating someone who wasn’t their height… i’d call them hypocrites. though that’s almost never the case in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 01:51 AM
1

i’m over 6’ and my preference is for women my height. most of my (male) peers are far less picky than i am when it comes to their partner’s height
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 01:37 AM
1

typically it’s hypocrisy that bothers people. preferring a light-skinned partner isn’t hypocritical if you have light skin. preferring someone over 6’ or whatever is if you’re not that height.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 01:05 AM
1

paternity fraud isn’t adultery. it isn’t lying. it’s deceit that happens after those facts over the course of months or years.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 08:31 PM
14

yes, men should be charged with fraud if they successfully pass off an affair child as their partner’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 08:23 PM
-2

in almost no scenario am i cool with domestic abusers being around kids. providing a negative paternity test doesn’t suddenly unburden someone from paternity fraud. oftentimes, the state doesn’t suddenly take its thumb off of victims because of a test. almost never do they provide restitution. what’s the point of a test then?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 08:15 PM
1

‘just infidelity.’ i can’t take you seriously. paternity fraud goes far beyond just adultery.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 08:11 PM
-2

yes, family courts are all sorts of fucked up. are you cool with abusers parenting children in all (or any) cases?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 08:05 PM
-3

paternity fraud is, definitionally, domestic abuse. are there any other types of domestic abusers you’d allow to parent their children?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 07:58 PM
2

i guess i need some context, what’s going on in the pictograph here?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 11:24 PM
1

Any leftist with half a brain (hopefully Feminists™️ fall into this category) realizes that the United States has fed itself with the military-industrial complex for the past 100 years. feminists know selective service isn’t going anywhere- in totality. This ‘abolish’ shit is just a thin facade to feign egalitarianism. It’s the closest they can get to the status quo and still save face. Same with ‘bodily autonomy.’ It seems fine to curtail this right in plenty of other contexts, but never electi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 02:38 AM
0

LMAO ok, your consideration for the potential life goes as far as “fuck ‘em” In fairness, most every advocate for prenatal paternal surrender makes a similar concession. They believe that the welfare of potential life doesn’t trump a man’s right to freely labor without duress.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 08:19 PM
1

It’s not even a gotcha, it’s the exact same logic. If you think being pregnant is the vehicle through which people (regardless of sex) obtain post-coital reproductive rights, then it should stand to reason that registering for selective service is the means through which individuals (regardless of sex) obtain voting rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:43 PM
-2

Any discussion about medical abortion that doesn’t consider the needs of the fetus is fucking pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:21 PM
-2

Selective service is not gender neutral So surely you’re in favor of voting laws in the US reflecting this nonneutrality?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:14 PM
-1

As always, women who register for selective service have the same voting rights as men. Men who do not register for selective service have the same voting rights as women. According to you, repealing the 19th IS the gender-neutral solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:01 PM
–

false equivalency. but i bet you already knew that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:13 AM
–

incoherent? i think you may be on the spectrum if you struggle comprehending a handful of cogent sentences.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 02:13 AM
–

i bet you're right! i really appreciate the non sequitur
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 01:04 AM
–

children DON'T have a right to bodily autonomy in the United States. it's not a debatable perspective, it's literally just a fact... i'm sorry this particular fact makes you so uncomfy
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 01:00 AM
–

decision-making power?? what decision are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:56 AM
–

you're welcome to engage in the actual debate anytime now
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:52 AM
–

my bodily autonomy wasn't 'disrespected,' it never even existed. They are people, not products. Again, you gleefully admitting you think children are subhuman and basically property this is nothing but projection. what you really believe is parents are subhuman and basically property to their children. YOU believe children are owed servitude from their parents (even the one who didn't create the child) for no other reason than existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:45 AM
–

i never had a right to an autonomous body. not once. take it up with my fat, circumcised dick. frankly, until ALL children have the right to bodily autonomy, i don't think they're entitled to shit. esepcially not the products of someone else's labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:16 AM
–

you think children have a right to bodily autonomy? that's adorable
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:08 AM
–

what rights do you think children deserve? financial support? access to education? how about bodily autonomy?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:04 AM
–

oh, well then congrats on your inability to articulate your sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:29 PM
–

If they could, I'd support abortion for them too. this is your most retarded point within the whole thread. 'if men were women, i'd support them in having reproductive rights' really isn't the slam dunk you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:22 PM
1

the wage gap is slightly unfair to women. boohoo booboo. now thems some breaks
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 01:40 AM
-2

why should the government pay for shit? end SNAP, Medicaid and housing assistance programs
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 11:40 PM
1

your whole argument is completely undercut by the very last word.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 03:57 AM
2

a man DOESN'T have a part in creating a baby. a man only has a part in creating a clump of cells.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 08:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter